Transcriptome analysis of Aspergillus niger grown on sugarcane bagasse
- Wagner R de Souza1Email author,
- Paula F de Gouvea1Email author,
- Marcela Savoldi1,
- Iran Malavazi2,
- Luciano A de Souza Bernardes3,
- Maria Helena S Goldman4,
- Ronald P de Vries5,
- Juliana V de Castro Oliveira6 and
- Gustavo H Goldman1, 6Email author
© de Souza et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 8 August 2011
Accepted: 18 October 2011
Published: 18 October 2011
Considering that the costs of cellulases and hemicellulases contribute substantially to the price of bioethanol, new studies aimed at understanding and improving cellulase efficiency and productivity are of paramount importance. Aspergillus niger has been shown to produce a wide spectrum of polysaccharide hydrolytic enzymes. To understand how to improve enzymatic cocktails that can hydrolyze pretreated sugarcane bagasse, we used a genomics approach to investigate which genes and pathways are transcriptionally modulated during growth of A. niger on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse (SEB).
Herein we report the main cellulase- and hemicellulase-encoding genes with increased expression during growth on SEB. We also sought to determine whether the mRNA accumulation of several SEB-induced genes encoding putative transporters is induced by xylose and dependent on glucose. We identified 18 (58% of A. niger predicted cellulases) and 21 (58% of A. niger predicted hemicellulases) cellulase- and hemicellulase-encoding genes, respectively, that were highly expressed during growth on SEB.
Degradation of sugarcane bagasse requires production of many different enzymes which are regulated by the type and complexity of the available substrate. Our presently reported work opens new possibilities for understanding sugarcane biomass saccharification by A. niger hydrolases and for the construction of more efficient enzymatic cocktails for second-generation bioethanol.
open reading frame
reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
Brazil is currently responsible for about 33% of the bioethanol produced worldwide and may play an important role in satisfying future bioethanol demand . Nowadays there are more than 400 plants in operation crushing 625 million tons of sugarcane per year, with approximately one-half used for sugar and the other half used for bioethanol production . In 2010, approximately 27.7 billion liters of bioethanol were produced on 8.0 million hectares of land . The efficiency of sugarcane-to-ethanol production can still be increased through improvements in the agricultural and industrial phases of the production process [1, 3, 4]. Sugarcane bagasse (SB) contains one-third of the energy in sugarcane and is the source of all the energy needed in bioethanol mills. The other two-thirds are split between sucrose and the tops and leaves . Presently the production of bioethanol in Brazil relies exclusively on first-generation technologies that are based on the utilization of the sucrose content of sugarcane. If sugarcane trash were collected and used for bioethanol production, it would generate an additional 3,700 to 4,000 L/ha bioethanol (9,700 to 10,000 L/ha total), thus reducing the land use requirement by 33% to 38%. The development of new and efficient technologies for hydrolysis of SB could improve this energetic balance considerably and create the basis for second-generation bioethanol. It is estimated that capital costs associated with lignocellulosic bioethanol are US$4.00/gallon and that these costs need to be reduced by more than half to be economically sustainable [5, 6]. Complete substrate utilization is one of the prerequisites to rendering lignocellulosic ethanol processes economically competitive. This means that all types of sugars in lignocellulose must be converted to ethanol and that microorganisms must be obtained that efficiently perform this conversion under industrial conditions. Lignocellulose is composed of cellulose (40% to 50%), hemicellulose (25% to 35%) and lignin (15% to 20%) [7, 8]. Glucose constitutes about 60% of the total sugars available in cellulosic biomaterial. Fermentation of the available sugars in cellulosic biomass presents a unique challenge because of the presence of other sugars, such as xylose and arabinose (C5 sugars). The degree of branching and the identity of the minor sugars in hemicelluloses tend to vary, depending upon the type of plant. The conversion of biomass to usable energy is not economical unless hemicellulose is used in addition to cellulose.
Considering that the costs of cellulases and hemicellulases contribute substantially to the price of bioethanol, new studies aimed at understanding and improving cellulase efficiency and productivity are of paramount importance. Filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus niger and Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) have been shown to produce a wide spectrum of polysaccharide hydrolytic enzymes. They are impressive producers of hydrolytic enzymes already applied in a variety of industrial processes, such as the food, feed, pulp, paper and textile industries. Recently, the genome sequences of A. niger and T. reesei have become available [9, 10]. The A. niger and T. reesei genomes contain 14,600 and 9,129 genes, among which about 200 and 170, respectively, are involved in polysaccharide degradation. In A. niger, the expression of all major cellulases and hemicellulases is coregulated by the same inducer molecule (that is, D-xylose), but the induction mechanisms in T. reesei are more diverse. At least four different inductor molecules (that is, D-xylose, xylobiose, sophorose and lactose) have been described, but none of them has the potential to trigger the expression of all main cellulases and hemicellulases . The xylanolytic/cellulolytic system in A. niger is regulated through the transcriptional activator XlnR. The A. niger xlnR transcription factor is a master regulator that activates enzymes of the xylanolytic system, a number of endocellulases and at least two cellobiohydrolases, but not that of β-glucosidase . The major repressor protein regulating the carbon catabolite repression of genes involved in carbon metabolism in Aspergillus and Trichoderma is CreA [12, 13]. Surprisingly, CreA is the only regulatory protein for which mediation of carbon repression has been demonstrated in fungi.
Although the source of cellulases is also other fungal species, enzymatic cocktails based on T. reesei dominate the market. However, a comparison of the genome sequences of T. reseei  and A. niger  shows that A. niger is more versatile in the range of cellulases, hemicellulases and esterases encoded, and the latter two groups of enzymes are likely to become more important if pretreatment steps become less extensively used. A. niger has become a very useful model fungus for basic studies in recent years because it has available annotated genome sequences, gene transfer systems and a variety of regulatory mutants. It is unlikely that commercial cellulases from A. niger will supplant those from T. reesei. The opportunity afforded by using the A. niger system is to provide new knowledge regarding the regulation of hydrolases (especially cellulases, hemicellulases and esterases) and accessory proteins that assist in the saccharification of complex substrates. To understand how enzymatic cocktails that can hydrolyze pretreated SBs can be improved, we used a genomics-based approach to investigate which genes and pathways are transcriptionally modulated during growth of A. niger on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse (SEB). Herein we report the main cellulase- and hemicellulase-encoding genes that show increased expression during growth on SEB. We also sought to determine whether the mRNA accumulation of several SEB-induced genes encoding putative transporters is induced by xylose and repressed by glucose.
Transcriptome analysis of Aspergillus niger grown on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse
Predicted Aspergillus niger cellulase-encoding genes that have increased mRNA accumulation during growth on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse compared to growth on fructose reference control
log2 Cy5/Cy3 ratio**
β-glucosidase precursor (bgluc)
β-glucosidase 2 (bgl2)
Endo-β-1.4-glucanase A (eglA)
Cellulose 1.4-β-cellobiosidase II (cbh2)
1.4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase A precursor (cbhA)
1.4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase B precursor (cbhB)
Endoglucanase A (eglA)
Similarity to endoglucanase IV (egl4)
Predicted Aspergillus niger hemicellulase-encoding genes that have increased mRNA accumulation during growth on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse compared to growth on fructose reference control
log2 Cy5/Cy3 ratio**
Bifunctional xylosidase-arabinosidase (xarB)
Endo-1.4-β-xylanase A precursor (xynA)
Xylanase A (xynA)
Endo-1.4-β-xylanase B (xynB)
Arabinofuranosidase B (abfB)
1.4-β-D-arabinoxylan arabinofuranohydrolase (axhA)
Acetyl xylan esterase (axeA)
Validation of the microarray hybridization analysis
Gene expression measured by real-time RT-PCR of genes encoding Aspergillus niger cellulases, hemicellulases, xylose reductase and xlnR during growth on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse
Gene and locus
SEB 6 hours
SEB 12 hours
SEB 24 hours
0.0086 ± 0.0008
0.3178 ± 0.0104
0.0477 ± 0.0013
0.0284 ± 0.0066
0.0023 ± 0.0000
4.2126 ± 0.1298
1.2376 ± 0.0629
1.6419 ± 0.3598
0.0008 ± 0.0000
1.4762 ± 0.2621
0.7261 ± 0.0368
0.3397 ± 0.0740
0.0062 ± 0.0004
3.7060 ± 0.0112
0.6213 ± 0.0248
0.1227 ± 0.0263
0.0039 ± 0.0001
153.0746 ± 2.8399
9.8474 ± 0.6560
6.4386 ± 1.5611
0.0110 ± 0.0003
15.4472 ± 0.1495
0.7838 ± 0.0036
0.0617 ± 0.0149
0.76 ± 0.00
5.93 ± 0.62
1.71 ± 0.06
2.35 ± 0.24
0.33 ± 0.02
268.58 ± 6.22
45.84 ± 1.98
36.40 ± 1.11
Genes encoding putative transporters
Predicted Aspergillus niger transporter-encoding genes that have increased mRNA accumulation during growth on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse compared to growth on fructose reference control
log2 Cy5/Cy3 ratio**
Similarity to xylose permease (xylT)
Strong similarity to hexose transporter (hxt5)
Strong similarity to α-glucoside-hydrogen symporter (mal11)
Strong similarity to hexose transporter (hxt1)
Strong similarity to lactose permease (lac12)
Strong similarity to quinate transport protein (qutD)
Strong similarity to high-affinity glucose transporter (hgt1)
Gene expression measured by real-time RT-PCR of genes encoding Aspergillus niger putative transporters during growth on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse
SEB 6 hours
SEB 12 hours
SEB 24 hours
0.064 ± 0.007
1.41 ± 0.01
1.38 ± 0.29
0.10 ± 0.02
0.21 ± 0.03
0.89 ± 0.09
1.70 ± 0.30
0.22 ± 0.02
2.25 ± 0.25
8.96 ± 0.93
8.87 ± 1.15
1.49 ± 0.19
0.396 ± 0.017
2.49 ± 0.08
3.02 ± 0.32
0.094 ± 0.019
0.96 ± 0.08
23.40 ± 3.50
4.28 ± 0.64
3.17 ± 0.61
0.036 ± 0.004
0.037 ± 0.006
0.13 ± 0.02
0.110 ± 0.009
0.021 ± 0.004
0.071 ± 0.002
0.041 ± 0.007
0.003 ± 0.001
Gene expression measured by real-time RT-PCR of genes encoding Aspergillus niger putative transporters in presence of xylose or xylose and glucose
Xylose 1 hour
Xylose 4 hours
Xylose + glucose 1 hour
Xylose + glucose 4 hours
0.08 ± 0.03
0.42 ± 0.07
0.38 ± 0.05
0.003 ± 0.00
0.03 ± 0.01
0.05 ± 0.00
0.04 ± 0.00
0.20 ± 0.00
0.04 ± 0.00
0.02 ± 0.00
0.34 ± 0.04
0.24 ± 0.03
0.56 ± 0.12
0.09 ± 0.05
0.19 ± 0.05
0.06 ± 0.00
0.04 ± 0.01
0.17 ± 0.01
0.009 ± 0.001
0.05 ± 0.01
0.29 ± 0.04
0.20 ± 0.02
0.56 ± 0.03
0.010 ± 0.001
0.20 ± 0.05
0.25 ± 0.01
0.16 ± 0.03
0.60 ± 0.02
0.13 ± 0.01
0.45 ± 0.17
0.70 ± 0.03
2.40 ± 0.22
2.30 ± 0.64
0.25 ± 0.01
0.36 ± 0.07
In silico identification of XlnR-binding motifs
The functional A. niger XlnR-binding sites identified contain either 5'-TTAGCC-3' or 5'-GGCTAG-3' [15–17]. A search of the promoter regions (500 bp upstream of the putative translational start codon) of the 1,516 genes with increased mRNA accumulation (Additional file 3, Table S3) revealed 461 genes with promoter regions containing at least one of these two binding sites and 63 genes that contain multiple binding sites (Additional file 4, Table S4). At least 15 putative transporter encoding genes, including An01g00850, An06g00260, An12g09770 and An15g05440, were tested for xylose induction (Additional file 4, Table S4, and Tables 4 through 6). The genes An06g00260, An12g09270, An01g00850 and An15g05440 were induced by xylose and repressed by glucose, suggesting that their putative XlnR-binding sites could be functional (see Table 6 and "Genes encoding putative transporters" section). Putative XlnR-binding sites were also found in the promoter regions of three genes encoding transcription factors (An05g00480 (stuA), encoding a transcription factor involved in differentiation; An01g08050 (uaY) a positive regulator of purine utilization; and An07g08880 (cys-3), a positive sulfur regulator). We observed XlnR-binding sites in the promoter regions of two genes encoding proteins that participate in the pentose catabolic and phosphate pathways (An01g03740 (D-xylose reductase) and An07g03160 (transaldolase), respectively). A search of the promoter regions of the genes encoding cellulases and hemicellulases (Tables 1 and 2) revealed that 8 (of a total of 18 cellulase-encoding genes) and 11 (of a total of 21 hemicellulase-encoding genes) promoters, respectively, contained at least one binding site, and that among those, 5 promoters had multiple binding sites.
Secretome analysis of Aspergillus niger grown on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse
Protein identification by mass spectrometry from Aspergillus niger supernatants grown for 24 hours on steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse
NCBI GEO accession number
molecular mass (kDa)
Sequence coverage (%)
2.56 ± 0.03
2.10 ± 0.05
Glucan 1,4-α-glucosidase (GlaA)
1,4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase B (CbhB)
6.59 ± 0.15
7.94 ± 0.10
1,4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase A
3.89 ± 0.20
Candidate cellulose 1,4-β-cellobiosidase II (Cbh2)
4.37 ± 0.05
5.83 ± 0.09
Endo-1,4-β-xylanase A precursor
3.64 ± 0.06
1,4-β-D-arabinoxylan arabinofuranohydrolase (AxhA)
4.03 ± 0.01
3.64 ± 0.06
5.83 ± 0.09
Chain A, crystal structure of ferulic acid esterase
6.17 ± 0.99
4.36 ± 0.30
8.29 ± 0.04
Sugarcane biomass residues are produced in great amounts in several countries. In Brazil, sugarcane production is remarkable because100% of bioethanol production as a biofuel is derived from sugarcane through sucrose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This process uses the sucrose accumulated in the sugarcane xylem and has conventionally been called "first-generation bioethanol." This ethanol corresponds to only one-third of the energy that can be extracted from sugarcane. The other two-thirds, derived from sugarcane tops, leaves and bagasse, are resistant to direct S. cerevisiae fermentation because this organism is not able to produce hydrolytic enzymes to degrade celluloses and hemicelluloses. In contrast, filamentous fungi have the ability to produce great amounts of hydrolytic enzymes. In this sense, enzymatic cocktails based on those enzymes have been proposed as an alternative method to break the resistance of those residues to fermentation. No detailed analysis has been published to date about the composition and structure of SB. However, it is quite likely that the composition and structure of celluloses (for example, the crystalline structure, number and extent of fibers) and hemicelluloses (for example, branching and different pentose concentrations) in SB are different from those of other biomass sources, such as wheat straw. Thus there is still a need to understand SB composition and structure and the enzymes necessary to completely hydrolyze it.
In our present study, we investigated the transcriptional response of A. niger strain N402 grown on pretreated SB. The genome annotation of this strain was used for the microarray slides. However, this strain is more closely related to the A. niger genomic DNA strain 3528.7 (ATCC 1015; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) [GenBank:X52521], whose genome was recently published . Unfortunately, the genome sequence of ATCC 1015 was not available when we started this project, thus we were not able to use it for the annotated genes for the microarray design. Our microarray analysis revealed about 3,700 genes differentially expressed in A. niger grown on SEB. The FunCat database functional annotation approach was used to determine whether distinct functional groups of genes were overrepresented within our data set. This analysis revealed "C compound and carbohydrate metabolism" as the most significantly enriched class (Additional file 2, Table S2). More than 50% of genes predicted in the genome of A. niger related to cellulases and xylanases were upregulated on SEB, and several of them were independently confirmed by real-time RT-PCR and mass spectrometry. There is considerable interest in the investigation of genes regulated at the transcriptional level during cellulosic biomass degradation by A. niger or T. reesei [19–22]. However, in all these previously published reports, the inducers were single-carbon sources and not complex substrates such as SB. An exception is an article reporting transcriptional profiling when Neurospora crassa was cultured on ground Miscanthus gigantaeus stems as the sole carbon source . In comparing the data produced in our present work with the available expression data derived from N. crassa grown on M. gigantaeus, we observed that cellulases and hemicellulases present similar expression patterns, whereas the hydrolases specific to branching groups of the xylan backbone display less overlap in the compared systems. This difference could be attributed to the number of hydrolases, which vary widely among filamentous fungi. The N. crassa genome is predicted to be more limited in plant biomass degradation, with about 100 genes encoding hydrolases, whereas more than 170 could be identified in A. niger [9, 10], suggesting that the latter fungus may utilize a wider variety of polysaccharide structures as its carbon source. Furthermore, a wide variety of glycosyl hydrolase (GH) families and member numbers are present in each GH family among fungi with genome sequences available [24, 25]. Among the GH3 family, five members in the N. crassa genome and at least seventeen in the A. niger genome have been identified to date . Only one member of the GH3 family has been detected in the N. crassa transcriptome (NCU00810), but our analysis revealed that eight members of the GH3 family are upregulated in A. niger grown on SEB (An15g04800, An07g07630, An17g00520, An18g03570, An11g00200 and An11g06090 (β-glucosidases), and An01g09960 and An017g00300 (xylosidases)). Moreover, the differential expression of hydrolases specific to xylan branching chains found in A. niger could be due to differences in the cell wall structures of sugarcane and Miscanthus. However, when we compared 149 N. crassa genes showing enrichment on M. gigantaeus (FunCat analysis of genes showing enrichment mainly for C compound and carbohydrate metabolism; see Support Information Dataset 1 published by Tian et al. ) with the whole A. niger SEB data set (Additional file 3, Table S3), we observed that 59% of N. crassa genes have corresponding A. niger homologues with mRNA accumulation also modulated on SEB (Additional file 5, Table S5). For example, genes encoding putative transporters that could be involved in carbohydrate transport, such as An1503940, An14g01600 and An12g07450 (N. crassa NCU04963, NCU05853 and NCU10021, respectively), have increased mRNA accumulation in the presence of both SEB and Miscanthus (Additional file 5, Table S5). Genes involved in the metabolism of pentoses, such as An01g10920 and An12g00030 (L-arabinitol 4-dehydrogenase (N. crassa NCU00643) and xylitol dehydrogenase (N. crassa NCU00891), respectively), also have increased mRNA accumulation in both substrates (Additional file 5, Table S5). These data strongly suggest that although diverse biomasses could have a specific impact on gene expression, some general features of these different residues affect mRNA accumulation in different filamentous fungi. We have also identified many genes whose expression level increased during growth on SEB and which encode proteins of unknown function that are conserved in other cellulolytic fungi (data not shown). Further deletion analysis of these genes may provide more information about their function.
D-xylose, the main component of xylan backbone, and other pentoses derived from xylan branching chains, such as arabinose, are assimilated by the pentose phosphate pathway. As proposed by Witteveen et al. , pentose catabolism in A. niger includes a reduction and oxidation step leading to D-xylulose, which is converted to D-xylulose-5-phosphate and enters the pentose phosphate pathway. We found a significant increase in mRNA accumulation of the genes encoding these enzymes (xylose reductase (An01g03740), xylitol dehydrogenase (An08g09380) and D-xylulokinase (An07g03140)) during growth of A. niger on SEB. These data are supported by promoter analysis of the genes with putative binding sites for XlnR (reported herein and by Foreman et al. ) and by the induction of their expression when A. niger grows on xylose . Furthermore, the FunCat database classification "Pentose-phosphate pathway" (PPP) was represented in our analysis, suggesting that this complete catabolic pathway is upregulated when A. niger grows on SEB. Hasper et al.  showed that XlnR also regulates D-xylose reductase (xyrA), a gene from the pentose catabolic pathway, and it remains to be determined whether regulation at the mRNA level of other genes of the PPP is also XlnR-mediated.
Genes related to carbohydrate transport were also identified in the category "C compound and carbohydrate metabolism." The degradation of a complex biomass results in products such as glucose, cellobiose, xylobiose and xylose. Those products need to be transported into the fungal cytoplasm to be metabolized. Hence the upregulation of these genes should be required for better utilization of different sugars released from SB degradation. Our laboratory is interested in identifying transporter-encoding genes that could be involved in xylose transport. Toward this end we selected seven transporter-encoding genes and validated their expression levels by real-time RT-PCR. To check the specificity of these transporters, we tested genes with expression induced by xylose and repressed by glucose. We found that all of them were induced by SEB and showed increased mRNA accumulation when xylose was used as a single-carbon source. S. cerevisiae is a very poor xylose utilizer [28, 29], and construction of strains able to transport xylose and/or other pentoses more efficiently by heterologous expression of these A. niger transporters may improve industrial fermentation of biomass hydrolytic products. None of these transporters or their homologues in other filamentous fungi have been characterized.
Nutrient sensing and signaling via pathways involving hexokinases, glucose transporter-like proteins, G protein-coupled receptors and protein kinases have been well-characterized in yeast [30–33]. Studies of multicellular filamentous fungi are at only a nascent stage. However, it is clear that the situation is considerably more complex in filamentous fungi than in yeast. This could be due to the preference of yeast for glucose fermentation instead of aerobic metabolism through the Krebs cycle as is the case in filamentous fungi. Although hydrolases, sugar transport and assimilation are essential for biomass degradation, we also observed other cellular responses induced when A. niger was exposed to SEB. We noticed decreased mRNA accumulation in several genes involved in cell growth and morphogenesis. Because A. niger grows an intermingled fashion with the set of SEB macroscopic fibers, it is not possible to accurately evaluate the dry weight of A. niger mycelia. We also tried to measure total protein concentration by Bradford and Biuret protein assays, but we were unable to obtain coherent results, most likely because of sugar interference (data not shown). However, it is possible that there is a slow biomass increase during the 24-hour exposure of A. niger mycelia to SEB. This slow growth is reflected in the reduced mRNA accumulation of several genes crucial to cell-cycle progression and signaling. It remains to be determined how significant these signal transduction pathways are for lignocellulosic sensing. Genes involved in fermentation have also shown increased mRNA accumulation during A. niger growth on SEB. There is evidence in the literature indicating that some fermentation occurs in addition to respiration through the Krebs cycle in filamentous fungi [34–36], and it is possible that, during growth on SEB, A. niger metabolizes sugars via fermentation pathways in addition to the pentose phosphate pathway and the Krebs cycle.
A. niger xlnR is a transcription factor that functions as a master regulator which activates genes that encode enzymes of the xylanolytic-cellulolytic enzyme system . Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), DNase I footprinting, functional assays and comparisons of various xylanolytic promoters have helped to define the XlnR-binding consensus as 5'-GGCTAA-3' or 5'-GGCTAG-3' [14–16]. We were able to identify either one or both of these two motifs in several putative XlnR-binding sites in the promoters of the genes that were induced by SEB. Surprisingly, we were not able to identify them in a number of cellulase-, hemicellulase- and xylose-induced transporter genes, which suggests that there are other functional XlnR-binding motifs. Further characterization of the mRNA accumulation of these genes in the ΔxlnR mutant as well as DNA promoter binding assays (such as EMSA) will help to clarify whether these putative motifs are functional. Actually, the A. oryzae XlnR homologue binds to 5'-GGCTAA-3' and 5'-GGCTGA-3' [37, 38] while T. reesei Xyr1 homologue binds to several 5'-GGC(A/T)3-3' motifs . Therefore, it is possible that there are other XlnR-binding functional motifs different from those currently described. Further investigation is needed to clarify this issue.
We have defined which genes are transcriptionally modulated in the early steps of growth on SEB. This study represents the first time that global transcriptional analysis has been performed for an industrial fungus grown on SB. Our analysis has revealed genes that are specifically induced when pretreated SB is used as a carbon source. Degradation of SB requires the production of many different enzymes which are regulated by the type and complexity of the available substrate. It is essential to understand which genes encoding hydrolytic enzymes are induced in the presence of SB if the intent is to produce enzymatic cocktails to hydrolyze this pretreated biomass. In addition to predicted cellulase genes, we identified genes encoding hemicellulases, carbohydrate esterases, β-glucosidases, β-xylosidases and other proteins predicted to have activity on carbohydrates in the A. niger transcriptome from SEB. In addition to these findings, we discovered that many genes with increased expression during growth on SEB encode proteins of unknown function and are conserved in other cellulolytic fungi. Some of these genes may encode putative proteins important for SEB saccharification, such as nonhydrolytic accessory proteins that increase or favor enzymatic efficiency. Our work opens new possibilities for the understanding of sugarcane biomass saccharification by A. niger hydrolases. The most important aspect of our study with regard to achieving these biotechnological goals is the comprehension of how gene expression is regulated during SEB saccharification. The heterologous expression of the genes that encode hydrolytic enzymes and their addition to enzymatic cocktails could improve enzymatic hydrolytic efficiency and consequently SEB saccharification. In addition, the construction of A. niger strains overexpressing some of the genes encoding these proteins can improve SEB saccharification. We observed a great number of transporter-encoding genes that may be functionally redundant or capable of transporting oligosaccharides produced by the action of secreted hydrolytic enzymes. Thus, by improving the efficiency of industrial fermentation of biomass hydrolytic products, it is possible to construct strains capable of transporting oligosaccharides by heterologous expression of A. niger transporters. This was recently achieved by expressing the N. crassa cellodextrin transport system in S. cerevisiae and promoting the efficient growth of this yeast strain on cellodextrins . Further work involving several of the genes and pathways described herein will help to pave the way to more efficient enzymatic cocktails and second-generation bioethanol.
Strains and culture conditions
A. niger used was the N402 strain. The stock cultures were kept on silica beads with 7% milk (wt/vol) at 4°C. BCM (pH 5.5) was composed of 0.05% yeast extract (wt/vol), 50 ml/L salt solution (6 g/L NaNO3, 1.5 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L KCl and 0.5 g/L MgSO4), 200 μl/L trace elements (10 g/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 4.4 g/L ZnSO4·H2O, 1.0 g/L MnCl2·4H2O, 0.32 g/L CoCl2·6H2O, 0.315 g/L CuSO4·5H2O, 0.22 g/L (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, 1.47 g/L CaCl2·2H2O and 1 g/L FeSO4·H2O) and a predetermined concentration of carbon source according to our experimental conditions. For cultivation in medium with SEB as the carbon source, the mycelia grown in the BCM were exhaustively washed with sterile distilled water and then transferred into BCM without 0.05% yeast extract but with 0.5% wt/vol of SEB as the carbon source. The BCM, BCM without yeast extract and BCM with SEB media contained (means ± SD): 3.1380 ± 0.1018 mg/ml, 0.0036 ± 0.004 mg/ml and 0.0073 ± 0.0012 mg/ml reducing sugars, respectively (data represent means of three experiments run in triplicate, with each medium type run three times using dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS)) . SEB was kindly donated by Nardini Agroindustrial Ltda, Vista Alegre do Alto, São Paulo, Brazil, and was prepared as follows. In natura SB was treated with 14 kg/cm2 water steam for eight minutes. The SEB was exhaustively washed with deionized water until reducing sugars were not detected by DNS . After being washed, the SEB was kept completely dry at 40°C for several days and stored at room temperature. SEB fragments were stained with 0.05% toluidine blue for ten minutes and washed twice with water for five minutes.
Xylan and steam-exploded sugarcane induction
A. niger spores were cultivated in complete medium (CM) at 30°C for three to five days and harvested by adding 20 ml of distilled water. The spore suspensions were inoculated to a final concentration of 1 × 106 spores per 30 ml of BCM culture. The spores were grown in BCM with 1% fructose (wt/vol) as the carbon source at 30°C for 24 hours and then transferred to either 1% xylose or 1% xylan (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) or 0.5% SEB (wt/vol) as the carbon source for 6, 12 or 24 hours. Mycelia were harvested by filtration through Whatman grade 1 filters (GE Healthcare, Grandview Blvd. Waukesha, WI, USA)), washed thoroughly with sterile water and quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen for further RNA extraction. The supernatant was kept at -20°C for enzymatic analysis.
Determination of enzymatic activities
Xylanase (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) and cellulase (endo-1,4-β-glucanase) assays were performed using Azo-Xylan (Birchwood) and Azo-CM-Cellulose (both from Megazyme International, Bray, Ireland) as substrates, respectively, according to the manufacturer's protocols. Briefly, supernatant containing enzymes from SEB- or xylan-induced A. niger was mixed with 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) in an appropriate volume. Reaction mixtures consisted of 0.5 ml of buffered enzyme preparation and 0.5 ml of substrate solution (1% wt/vol Azo-Xylan (Birchwood) for xylanase assay or 1% wt/vol Azo-CM-Cellulose for cellulase assay)). The samples were incubated at 40°C for ten minutes, and the reactions were interrupted by adding 2.5 ml of ethanol (95% vol/vol) with vigorous stirring. Nondegraded substrate precipitated by ethanol was removed by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for ten minutes, and the absorbance of the supernatant at 590 nm was measured. Enzymatic activity was determined using Mega-Calc™ software (Megazyme International). One unit of enzymatic activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 mM D-xylose-reducing sugar equivalent per minute from arabinoxylan (pH 4.5) at 40°C.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR reactions
After being harvested, mycelia were disrupted by grinding and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA (10 μg) from each treatment was fractionated in 2.2 M formaldehyde and 1.2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized with UV light to check RNA integrity. The samples were then treated with RNAse-free DNAse as previously described , purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA)) and then quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA)).
All the PCR reactions were performed using the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies). The reactions and calculations were performed according to the method described by Semighini et al. . The primers, including the LUX™ fluorogenic primer (Invitrogen/Life Technologies), and probes used in this work are described in Additional file 6, Table S6, and the coefficients of the linear regression lines (standard curves) were added as described in Additional file 7, Table S7. The results of the microarray hybridizations were validated by real-time RT-PCR using an independent biological repetition different from those used for microarray hybridizations.
Microarray slides construction and gene expression methods
To construct the microarray slides, we used the Agilent Technologies eArray software tool (https://earray.chem.agilent.com/earray/; Agilent Technologies, Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Briefly, we uploaded 14,086 gene sequences representing the A. niger CBS513.88 strain gene sequences. This ORF number was carefully validated by comparing the sequences deposited in three databanks (CADRE (The Central Aspergillus Resource), JGI (Joint Genome Structure) and the BROAD Institute) with the aim of identifying and validating the sequences for probe design. Although some discrepancies in sequence length and number were detected, we were able to identify 14,086 ORFs, which were uploaded to eArray. On the basis of some quality parameter implemented in eArray (such as sequences with high scores for cross-hybridization potential throughout the genome and sequences for which no appropriate regions could be found as targets), 14,052 probes were designed from the uploaded sequence of CBS513.88. These probes were represented three times in the microarray slides, and the annotation based on the work of Pel et al.  was used to generate the annotation file used in the analysis. Therefore, the microarray slides comprised 45,220 features representing 1,417 eArray internal controls and 600 internal controls representing 60 randomly chosen ORFs (10 replicates).
To verify differential transcriptional activation of genes in A. niger grown on SEB for 6, 12 and 24 hours, we measured gene expression using microarray procedures. The gene expression analysis used in this work was carried out using custom-designed oligonucleotide slides (4 × 44 K microarray slides; Agilent Technologies, Inc), based on publicly available A. niger genome annotation. After RNA isolation and purification as described above, the samples were labeled with cyanine 3 (Cy3) or Cy5 dUTP using two-color microarray-based gene expression analysis (Quick Amp Labeling Kit; Agilent Technologies, Inc) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Initially, 5 μg of total RNA were incubated with Agilent Technologies RNA Spike-In Kit control probes (Spike A or B Mix). Prior to labeling, synthesis of cDNA was carried out by incubating the samples with 1.2 μl of T7 promoter primer and nuclease-free water in an appropriate volume. The template and primer were denatured by incubating the reaction at 65°C in a circulating water bath for ten minutes, and were placed on ice for five minutes after the reactions. We added Agilent Technologies cDNA Master Mix (4 μl of 5× First-Strand Buffer, 2 μl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 μl of 10 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate mix, 1 μl of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV-RT) and 0.5 μl of RNaseOut) to the samples, and the mixture was incubated at 40°C in a circulating water bath for two hours. Afterward the samples were moved to a 65°C circulating water bath and incubated for 15 minutes. cRNA amplification and labeling were performed by adding Agilent Technologies Transcription Master Mix (20 μl of 4× transcription buffer, 6 μl of 0.1 M DTT, 8 μl of nucleoside triphosphate mix, 6.4 μl of 50% PEG, 0.5 μl of RNaseOUT, 0.6 μl of inorganic pyrophosphatase, 0.8 μl of T7 RNA polymerase, 2.4 μl of Cy3-CTP added to control samples or Cy5-CTP added to treated samples, and 15.3 μl of nuclease-free water) to the samples and incubating the mixture in a circulating water bath at 40°C for two hours. The labeled cRNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit and then quantified in the NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer.
For the hybridization, 825 ng of each labeled cRNA were mixed with Agilent Technologies fragmentation buffer (11 μl of 10× blocking agent, 2.2 μl of 25× fragmentation buffer and nuclease-free water to bring the volume to 52.8 μl) and incubated at 60°C for exactly 30 minutes to fragment RNA. The fragmentation was interrupted by adding 55 μl of 2× Hi-RPM GE Hybridization Buffer (Agilent Technologies, Inc). Next, 100 μl of sample were placed onto the microarray slide, which was mounted into the Agilent Microarray Hybridization Chamber. The hybridization was carried out in a microarray hybridization oven (G2545A; Agilent Technologies, Inc) set to 65°C for 17 hours. Afterward microarray slides were washed according to the manufacturer's instructions and scanned using a GenePix 4000B Microarray Scanner (Molecular Devices, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Gene expression analysis
The extraction of data from TIFF image files generated by scanning microarray slides was performed using Feature Extraction version 184.108.40.206 software (Agilent Technologies, Inc) using the linear Lowess algorithm modeling method to obtain background subtracted and normalized intensity values. The dye-normalized values generated in the Feature Extraction software data files were used to upload the ExpressConverter version 2.1 file transformation tool (TM4 Microarray Software Suite; available at http://www.tm4.org/utilities.html), which conveniently converts the Agilent file format to MultiExperiment Viewer (MeV) file format, which is compatible with the TM4 software platform for microarray analysis. The MeV files were then uploaded into Microarray Data Analysis System (MIDAS) software (TM4 platform), where the resulting data were averaged from replicated genes on each array from two biological replicates of each treatment. The generated MeV files were analyzed using TIGR MeV software (TM4 platform, MultiExperiment Viewer (The Institute for Genomic Research, J. Craig Venter Institute, at http://jcvi.org)), where differentially expressed genes were statistically identified using a one-class t-test (P > 0.001). Significantly different genes were those whose mean log2 expression ratios for all included samples were statistically different from 0, which indicates the absence of gene modulation. The full data set was deposited in the National Center of Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database [GEO:GSE24798] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE24798.
To calculate the FDR, we used the method based on mixture distribution described by Allison et al. . This method was implemented using GenStat statistical software package (VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK) with the P values as input, and FDRs (corrected P values) corresponding to each P value were generated. This test generates a large number of significance values, which under H0 (initial hypothesis) have a uniform distribution and under the alternative hypothesis can be modeled as a β- or truncated γ-density. The mixture distribution statistics estimate the parameters of the mixture distribution to derive the FDR. Further information can be obtained in the GenStat for Analysis of Microarray Data guide http://www.vsni.co.uk/downloads/genstat/release14/doc/MicroarrayGuide.pdf.
Protein secretion analysis
The 30-ml supernatant from the sample induced with SEB for 24 hours was lyophilized and resuspended in 50 μl of distilled water. To separate secreted proteins, one-dimensional PAGE was performed using NuPAGE Novex Bis-Tris Mini Gels (Invitrogen/Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 50 μl of sample were mixed with 4× NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer, heated at 70°C for ten minutes and loaded onto the gel. The gel run was prepared 20× NuPAGE MES SDS Running Buffer to 950 ml of deionized water and performed at 125 mA with 1× SDS Running Buffer. To visualize the secreted proteins, the gel was stained with mass spectrometry-compatible Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (USB Corp, Cleveland, OH, USA) and washed in 1% acetic acid before being imaged and processed for mass spectrometry.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry
Peptide mass fingerprinting of selected bands was carried out by in-gel trypsin digestion (Sequencing Grade Modified Trypsin; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as reported previously . Briefly, peptides were extracted from the gels using 60% acetonitrile in 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), concentrated by vacuum drying and desalted using C18 reverse-phase microcolumns (OMIX Pipette Tips; Varian, Inc, Walnut Creek, CA, USA). Peptide elution from tip columns was performed directly into the mass spectrometer sample plate with 3 μl of matrix solution (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 60% aqueous acetonitrile containing 0.2% TFA). Mass spectra were acquired using a 4800 Plus MALDI TOF/TOF Analyzer (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) in reflector mode and externally calibrated using a mixture of peptide standards. Collision-induced dissociation MS-MS experiments of selected peptides were also performed. Proteins were identified by database searching with peptide m/z values using the Mascot sequence query program (Matrix Science, Inc, Boston, MA, USA) with the following search parameters: monoisotopic mass tolerance 0.05 Da, fragment mass tolerance 0.3 Da, methionine oxidation as a variable modification, and one missed tryptic cleavage allowed. Only Mowse algorithm  protein scores greater than 85 were considered statistically significant (P < 0.05)
This research was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brazil. We thank Dr João Atílio Jorge for helping us with the steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse and the three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments.
- Leite RCC, Leal MRLV, Cortez LAB, Griffin WM, Scandiffio MIG: Can Brazil replace 5% of the 2025 gasoline world demand with ethanol? Energy 2009, 34:655–661.View Article
- Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (Conab): Acompanhamento da safra Brasileira: cana-de-açúcar, terceiro levantamento, Janeiro 2011. Brasilia, Brazil: Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento; 2011.
- Goldemberg J: Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 2007, 315:808–810.View Article
- Goldemberg J: The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnol Biofuels 2008, 1:6.
- Hahn-Hagerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G, Zacchi G: Bio-ethanol: the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 2006, 24:549–556.View Article
- Gray KA, Zhao L, Emptage M: Bioethanol. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2006, 10:141–146.View Article
- Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davidson BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ Jr, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T: The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 2006, 311:484–489.View Article
- Lin Y, Tanaka S: Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 69:627–642.View Article
- Pel HJ, de Winde JH, Archer DB, Dyer PS, Hofmann G, Schaap PJ, Turner G, de Vries RP, Albang R, Albermann K, Andersen MR, Bendtsen JD, Benen JA, van den Berg M, Breestraat S, Caddick MX, Contreras R, Cornell M, Coutinho PM, Danchin EG, Debets AJ, Dekker P, van Dijck PW, van Dijk A, Dijkhuizen L, Driessen AJ, d'Enfert C, Geysens S, Goosen C, Groot GS, de Groot PW, Guillemette T, Henrissat B, Herweijer M, van den Hombergh JP, van den Hondel CA, van der Heijden RT, van der Kaaij RM, Klis FM, Kools HJ, Kubicek CP, van Kuyk PA, Lauber J, Lu X, van der Maarel MJ, Meulenberg R, Menke H, Mortimer MA, Nielsen J, Oliver SG, Olsthoorn M, Pal K, van Peij NN, Ram AF, Rinas U, Roubos JA, Sagt CM, Schmoll M, Sun J, Ussery D, Varga J, Vervecken W, van de Vondervoort PJ, Wedler H, Wösten HA, Zeng AP, van Ooyen AJ, Visser J, Stam H: Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:221–231.View Article
- Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, Chapman J, Chertkov O, Coutinho PM, Cullen D, Danchin EG, Grigoriev IV, Harris P, Jackson M, Kubicek CP, Han CS, Ho I, Larrondo LF, de Leon AL, Magnuson JK, Merino S, Misra M, Nelson B, Putnam N, Robbertse B, Salamov AA, Schmoll M, Terry A, Thayer N, Westerholm-Parvinen A, Schoch CL, Yao J, Barabote R, Nelson MA, Detter C, Bruce D, Kuske CR, Xie G, Richardson P, Rokhsar DS, Lucas SM, Rubin EM, Dunn-Coleman N, Ward M, Brettin TS: Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina ). Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:553–560.View Article
- Stricker AR, Grosstessner-Hain K, Würleitner E, Mach RL: Xyr1 (xylanase regulator 1) regulates both the hydrolytic enzyme system and D-xylose metabolism in Hypocrea jecorina . Eukaryot Cell 2006, 5:2128–2137.View Article
- Ruijter GJG, Visser J: Carbon repression in Aspergilli . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1997, 151:103–114.View Article
- Nakari-Setälä T, Paloheimo M, Kallio J, Vehmaanperä J, Penttilä M, Saloheimo M: Genetic modification of carbon catabolite repression in Trichoderma reesei for improved protein production. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:4853–4860.View Article
- Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, Mokrejs M, Tetko I, Güldener U, Mannhaupt G, Münsterkötter M, Mewes HW: The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:5539–5545.View Article
- van Peij NNME, Gielkens MMC, de Vries RP, Visser J, de Graaff LH: The transcriptional activator XlnR regulates both xylanolytic and endoglucanase gene expression in Aspergillus niger . Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64:3615–3619.
- van Peij NNME, Visser J, de Graaf JH: Isolation and analysis of xln R, encoding a transcriptional activator co-ordinating xylanolytic expression in Aspergillus niger . Mol Microbiol 1998, 27:131–142.View Article
- de Vries RP, van de Vondervoort PJ, Hendriks L, van de Belt M, Visser J: Regulation of the α-glucuronidase-encoding gene ( aguA ) from Aspergillus niger . Mol Genet Genomics 2002, 268:96–102.View Article
- Andersen MR, Salazar MP, Schaap PJ, van de Vondervoort PJ, Culley D, Thykaer J, Frisvad JC, Nielsen KF, Albang R, Albermann K, Berka RM, Braus GH, Braus-Stromeyer SA, Corrochano LM, Dai Z, van Dijck PW, Hofmann G, Lasure LL, Magnuson JK, Menke H, Meijer M, Meijer SL, Nielsen JB, Nielsen ML, van Ooyen AJ, Pel HJ, Poulsen L, Samson RA, Stam H, Tsang A, van den Brink JM, Atkins A, Aerts A, Shapiro H, Pangilinan J, Salamov A, Lou Y, Lindquist E, Lucas S, Grimwood J, Grigoriev IV, Kubicek CP, Martinez D, van Peij NNME, Roubos JA, Nielsen J, Baker SE: Comparative genomics of citric-acid-producing Aspergillus niger ATCC 1015 versus enzyme-producing CBS 513.88. Genome Res 2011, 21:885–897.View Article
- Foreman PK, Brown D, Dankmeyer L, Dean R, Diener S, Dunn-Coleman NS, Goedegebuur F, Houfek TD, England GJ, Kelley AS, Meerman HJ, Mitchell T, Mitchinson C, Olivares HA, Teunissen PJ, Yao J, Ward M: Transcriptional regulation of biomass-degrading enzymes in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei . J Biol Chem 2003, 278:31988–31997.View Article
- Andersen MR, Vongsangnak W, Panagiotou G, Salazar MP, Lehmann L, Nielsen J: A trispecies Aspergillus microarray: comparative transcriptomics of three Aspergillus species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:4387–4392.View Article
- Yuan XL, van der Kaaij RM, van den Hondel CA, Punt PJ, van der Maarel MJ, Dijkhuizen L, Ram AF: Aspergillus niger genome-wide analysis reveals a large number of novel α-glucan acting enzymes with unexpected expression profiles. Mol Genet Genomics 2008, 279:545–561.View Article
- Portnoy T, Margeot A, Linke R, Atanasova L, Fekete E, Sándor E, Hartl L, Karaffa L, Druzhinina IS, Seiboth B, Le Crom S, Kubicek CP: The CRE1 carbon catabolite repressor of the fungus Trichoderma reesei : a master regulator of carbon assimilation. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:269.View Article
- Tian C, Beeson WT, Iavarone AT, Sun J, Marletta MA, Cate JH, Glass NL: Systems analysis of plant cell wall degradation by the model filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:22157–22162.View Article
- van den Brink J, de Vries RP: Fungal enzyme sets for plant polysaccharide degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 91:1477–1492.View Article
- Coutinho PM, Anderson M, Kolenova K, vanKuyk PA, Benoit I, Gruben BS, Trejo-Aguilar B, Visser H, van Solingen P, Pakula T, Seiboth B, Battaglia E, Aguilar-Osorio G, de Jong JF, Ohm RA, Aguilar M, Henrissat B, Nielsen J, Stålbrand H, de Vries RP: Post-genomic insights into the plant polysaccharide degradation potential of Aspergillus nidulans and comparison to Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae . Fung Genet Biol 2009, 46:S161-S169.View Article
- Witteveen CFB, Busink R, van de Vondervoort P, Dijkema C, Swart K, Visser J: L-Arabinose and D-xylose catabolism in Aspergillus niger . Microbiology 1989, 135:2163–2171.View Article
- Hasper AA, Visser J, de Graaff LH: The Aspergillus niger transcriptional activator Xln R, which is involved in the degradation of the polysaccharides xylan and cellulose, also regulates D-xylose reductase gene expression. Mol Microbiol 2000, 36:193–200.View Article
- Jojima T, Omumasaba CA, Inui M, Yukawa H: Sugar transporters in efficient utilization of mixed sugar substrates: current knowledge and outlook. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85:471–480.View Article
- Madhavan A, Srivastava A, Kondo A, Bisaria VS: Bioconversion of lignocellulose-derived sugars to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Crit Rev Biotechnol, in press.
- Santangelo GM: Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006, 70:253–282.View Article
- Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR: How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet 2008, 42:27–81.View Article
- Gancedo JM: The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008, 32:673–704.View Article
- Turcotte B, Liang XB, Robert F, Soontorngun N: Transcriptional regulation of nonfermentable carbon utilization in budding yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 2010, 10:2–13.View Article
- Chambergo FS, Bonaccorsi ED, Ferreira AJ, Ramos AS, Ferreira Júnior JR, Abrahão-Neto J, Farah JP, El-Dorry H: Elucidation of the metabolic fate of glucose in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei using expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis and cDNA microarrays. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:13983–13988.View Article
- Maeda H, Sano M, Maruyama Y, Tanno T, Akao T, Totsuka Y, Endo M, Sakurada R, Yamagata Y, Machida M, Akita O, Hasegawa F, Abe K, Gomi K, Nakajima T, Iguchi Y: Transcriptional analysis of genes for energy catabolism and hydrolytic enzymes in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae using cDNA microarrays and expressed sequence tags. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004, 65:74–83.View Article
- Xie X, Wilkinson HH, Correa A, Lewis ZA, Bell-Pedersen D, Ebbole DJ: Transcriptional response to glucose starvation and functional analysis of a glucose transporter of Neurospora crassa . Fungal Genet Biol 2004, 41:1104–1119.View Article
- Marui J, Kitamoto N, Kato M, Kobayashi T, Tsukagoshi N: Transcriptional activator, AoXlnR, mediates cellulose-inductive expression of the xylanolytic and cellulolytic genes in Aspergillus oryzae . FEBS Lett 2002, 528:279–282.View Article
- Marui J, Tanaka A, Mimura S, de Graaff LH, Visser J, Kitamoto N, Kato M, Kobayashi T, Tsukagoshi N: A transcriptional activator, AoXlnR, controls the expression of genes encoding xylanolytic enzymes in Aspergillus oryzae . Fungal Genet Biol 2002, 35:157–169.View Article
- Furukawa T, Shida Y, Kitagami N, Ota Y, Adachi M, Nakagawa S, Shimada R, Kato M, Kobayashi T, Okada H, Ogasawara W, Morikawa Y: Identification of the cis -acting elements involved in regulation of xylanase III gene expression in Trichoderma reesei PC-3–7. Fungal Genet Biol 2008, 45:1094–1102.View Article
- Galazka JM, Tian C, Beeson WT, Martinez B, Glass NL, Cate JH: Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 2010, 330:84–86.View Article
- Miller GL: Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 1959, 31:426–428.View Article
- Semighini CP, Marins M, Goldman MHS, Goldman GH: Quantitative analysis of the relative transcript levels of ABC transporter Atr genes in Aspergillus nidulans by real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68:1351–1357.View Article
- Allison DB, Gadbury GL, Heo M, Fernández JR, Lee CK, Prolla TA, Weindruch R: A mixture model approach for the analysis of microarray gene expression data. Comput Stat Data Anal 2002, 39:1–20.View Article
- Parodi-Talice A, Durán R, Arrambide N, Prieto V, Piñeyro MD, Pritsch O, Cayota A, Cerveñansky C, Robello C: Proteome analysis of the causative agent of Chagas disease: Trypanosoma cruzi . Int J Parasitol 2004, 34:881–886.View Article
- Pappin DJC, Hojrup P, Bleasby AJ: Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting. Curr Biol 1993, 3:327–332.View Article
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.