Improvement of n-butanol tolerance in Escherichia coliby membrane-targeted tilapia metallothionein
© Chin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 May 2013
Accepted: 4 September 2013
Published: 11 September 2013
Though n-butanol has been proposed as a potential transportation biofuel, its toxicity often causes oxidative stress in the host microorganism and is considered one of the bottlenecks preventing its efficient mass production.
To relieve the oxidative stress in the host cell, metallothioneins (MTs), which are known as scavengers for reactive oxygen species (ROS), were engineered in E. coli hosts for both cytosolic and outer-membrane-targeted (osmoregulatory membrane protein OmpC fused) expression. Metallothioneins from human (HMT), mouse (MMT), and tilapia fish (TMT) were tested. The host strain expressing membrane-targeted TMT showed the greatest ability to reduce oxidative stresses induced by n-butanol, ethanol, furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural, and nickel. The same strain also allowed for an increased growth rate of recombinant E. coli under n-butanol stress. Further experiments indicated that the TMT-fused OmpC protein could not only function in ROS scavenging but also regulate either glycine betaine (GB) or glucose uptake via osmosis, and the dual functional fusion protein could contribute in an enhancement of the host microorganism’s growth rate.
The abilities of scavenging intracellular or extracellular ROS by these engineering E. coli were examined, and TMT show the best ability among three MTs. Additionally, the membrane-targeted fusion protein, OmpC-TMT, improved host tolerance up to 1.5% n-butanol above that of TMT which is only 1%. These results presented indicate potential novel approaches for engineering stress tolerant microorganism strains.
KeywordsMetallothionein n-butanol OmpC Tilapia E. coli Oxidative stress
n-Butanol has many advantages over ethanol, including a higher energy density due to two extra carbons, and can be used in gasoline engines without modification. n-Butanol is less hygroscopic and evaporative than ethanol and has been recently regarded as a more viable transportation biofuel than ethanol . Additionally, n-butanol is also a permitted artificial flavoring and is used in a wide range of industries, including the food and plastic industries . n-Butanol often occurs as a metabolic product of the microbial fermentation using sugars and other carbohydrates as carbon sources. However, during the production of n-butanol, its accumulation is known to be highly toxic to both natural producers and engineered hosts [3, 4]. This toxicity makes it difficult to produce large titers of n-butanol at levels needed for economic efficiency.
The cellular membrane is a vital factor that allows for cells to acclimate to external stresses and is also one of the components highly affected by organic solvents [5, 6]. Most toxicity researchers have proposed that the plasma membrane is the most affected target of organic solvents and plays a significant role in adapting to stress. Additionally, the length of the carbon backbone of organic solvents could alter the toxicity mechanism; increasing the hydrophobicity of the solvent could also raise the level of toxicity . The long- and short-chain alcohols are known to cause stress during biofuel production by changing membrane fluidity. Ethanol and n-butanol are known to respectively decrease and increase the membrane fluidity [6, 8, 9]. Understanding the membrane stress response to solvents and alcohols could facilitate engineer-ing microorganisms for improved toxin tolerance. As such, stress responses of organisms such as E. coli, to ethanol exposure has been widely studied , and information from these studies have been successfully adapted to engineering improved ethanologenic hosts . To understand the effect of n-butanol toxicity on the host, cell-wide studies have been conducted to obtain a global view of the n-butanol stress-response in transcript, protein, and metabolite levels. In Clostridium acetobutylicum, transcript analysis indicated that the primary response was an accumulation of transcripts encoding chaperones, proteases, and other heat shock-related proteins . In E. coli, several transcriptional analyses have been performed to understand the stress caused by alcohols including ethanol, n-butanol, and isobutanol [13–16]. Additionally, observations from fluorescent dye-staining indicated a large increase in reactive oxygen species during n-butanol stress . This increasing oxidative stress is a response of the cell to extracellular xenobiotics, which may mediate macromolecular damage. These free radicals could directly attack the membrane by lipid peroxidation .
ROS include molecules that are either oxidants (such as hydrogen peroxide, H2O2) or reductants (such as the superoxide anion, O2˙−). All are typical side products of cellular aerobic metabolism. To decrease ROS-generated oxidative damage, microorganisms synthesize many antioxidant enzymes, including catalases, superoxide dismutases and glutathione peroxidase [18, 19]. Recently, metallothioneins (MTs), a beneficial antioxidant enzyme that widely occurs in mammals, plants and fungi, has been identified . MTs are heat-stable, low-molecular-weight and cysteine-rich intracellular proteins that are responsible for maintaining the homeostasis of essential metals, such as Cu2+, Zn2+ and for the detoxification of toxic metal ions, such as Cd2+ and Hg2+[20–22]. In addition, MTs also play a role as a defense system against oxidative stress through their ROS-targeted scavenging abilities . For example, the tilapia fish (Oreochromis mossambicus), which serves as a biomarker for the contamination level of aqueous environments, has the ability to survive in a highly polluted environment because of its MTs function [24, 25]. Furthermore, purified tilapia MT (TMT) has been shown to have a higher ability than glutathione (GSH) to scavenge both 2-diphenyil-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH●) and 2,2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline- 6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS●+) . These observations have prompted us to postulate that TMT may serve as a good candidate for the purposes of metal absorption and free radicals scavenging in microorganisms during bio-fuel production.
It is known that the levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species increase in E. coli after exposure to n-butanol . In this study, we demonstrate that engineered E. coli strains expressing OmpC fused MTs could elevate n-butanol tolerance by scavenging intra- and extra-cellular free radicals and the fusion protein could still contribute in osmosis via either GB or glucose uptaking.
Results and discussion
Alcohols tolerance assay
Overview of ethanol and n-butanol tolerance in microorganisms
4 - 5%
0.5 – 1%
4 - 5%
1.5 – 2%
2.5 - 5%
1 – 2.25%
4 - 5%
1.2 - 1.5%
2.5 - 5%
2.5 - 3%
9.5 - 11%
1 - 2%
1 - 2%
1 - 2%
Strains used in this study
Genotype and description
Reference or source
E. coli BL21
E. coli B F- dcm ompT hsdS(rB- mB-) gal [malB+]K-12(λS)
E. coli BL21/ PET30a , T7 promoter, f1 origin, Kmr
E. coli BL21/PET30a;hmt (human metallothionein)
E. coli BL21/PET30a;mmt (mouse metallothionein)
E. coli BL21/PET30a;tmt (tilapia metallothionein)
E. coli BL21/PET30a;ompC (E. coli outer membrane protein C)
E. coli BL21/PET30a;ompC-hmt
E. coli BL21/PET30a;ompC-mmt
E. coli BL21/PET30a;ompC-tmt
In previous studies, MTs were known to increase cellular tolerance to toxins by scavenging free radicals that were produced during stress [33, 34]. In this study, it was hypothesized that the increased alcohol tolerance in engineered E. coli strains was due to the ability of MTs, particularly the TMT strains, to possess higher scavenging efficiencies as previously reported . Overall, both membrane-targeted MMT and TMT strains were found contributing to 3 times n-butanol (0.5% to 1.5%) and 1.25 times ethanol (4% to 5%) greater tolerances, respectively, than the control E. coli strains (pET30a). Interestingly, the OmpC over-expressed E. coli strains without MTs also enhanced its alcohol tolerance to 1% n-butanol and 4% ethanol; this phenomenon was also observed in another study in which an E. coli strain EbN1 was observed to tolerate phenol by expressing OmpC . We hypothesize that OmpC might not only act as a membrane-targeted protein but also utilizes its osmoregulative ability, leading to the accumulation of compatible solutes that prevent solvent stress.
Free radical scavenging ability
The roles of outer membrane (OM) proteins
In PYG medium, it was found that the growth rate of the OmpC overexpressed strains were nearly four times faster than other strains without overexpressed OmpC protein (Figure 3). Meanwhile, the OmpC overexpressed strains cultured in M9 minimal medium showed that growth rates were nearly 5 to 6.5 times lower than the same strains cultured in PYG medium. It was also observed that the growth rate of the TMT strain in M9 medium was 1.65 times lower when compared to the rate observed in PYG medium cultured TMT strain. Previous reports have observed that the porins OmpF and OmpC are differentially regulated by glucose concentrations because the two porins constitute the main glucose entry channels into the periplasm when the carbon source is present at a higher concentration of 0.2 mM (0.036 g/l) . Cellular growth rate has been correlated to the uptake of glucose via OmpF and OmpC. Based on these evidences, it suggested that overexpressed OmpC could not only increase growth through osmoregulation of compatible solutes such as GB but also regulating glucose-uptake-capacity in M9 minimal (2 g/l glucose) and PYG (10 g/l glucose) medium, It is also found that the cytosolic TMT strain showed higher growth rates than that of the OmpC and OmpC-TMT strains in M9 minimal medium. As non-rich medium could generate radicals in cytoplasmic matrix, this phenomenon might be mostly related to the free radicals scavenging ability of cytosolic TMT.
Tolerance assay of lignocellulose pretreatment’s toxins
In the bio-fuel industry, the pretreatment of lignocellulose substrate is a complex process requiring dilute acid and steam pretreatment and involving many toxins, including furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural and heavy metals . In this study, the engineered E. coli strains were also used to test the toxin tolerance of these compounds.
Furthermore, it is expected that the OmpC-MTs fusion strategy would show increased growth rates due to the combination of osmoregulation and MTs extracellular free radical scavenging abilities. Indeed, the OmpC-TMT strain was observed to have twice and 1.3 times of the growth rate compared to the OmpC strain in furfural and HMF, respectively, and better than pET30a strain (Figure 4a and 4b).
Heavy metals, such as nickel, may also be present in the host cell environment and are likely sourced from the substrates or its solubilized byproducts during lignocellulose pretreatment . In addition to the other toxins, nickel tolerance was also tested. All engineered E. coli strains showed a significant nickel tolerance compared to the control strain (pET30a strain) in 1 mM nickel (Figure 4c). When 2 mM nickel-supplemented media was used, only the OmpC-TMT strain showed a distinguished relative growth over the control strain (47.9%). It is predicted that the E. coli strains expressing the OmpC-TMT protein could chelate metals in the external milieu and could also decrease the toxin-induced oxidative stress in the cytosol. This mechanism was also suggested by a previous study, which used Hg to test toxin tolerance in E. coli.
This study uses a novel approach to develop E. coli strains that expresses cytosolic and membrane-targeted MTs to improve cell tolerance capacity of toxins derived from fermentation process. From results, we suggested that our construction strategy of OmpC-MT fusion protein for membrane targeting did not abolish the function of OmpC, as the dual functional OmpC-MT fusion protein could not only regulate compatible solutes and glucose but also reduce radicals to elevate the host’s toxins’ tolerances.
Materials and methods
All of the chemicals and reagents used were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich Co. USA, unless mentioned otherwise. The reagents, when available, were molecular biology grade. All solutions were prepared using these reagents and sterile distilled water.
Bacterial strains, culture media and culturing conditions
MTs expressing engineered constructs, protein expression and their locations in recombinants E. coli hosts were confirmed in our previous study . Batch cultures were grown in 10 ml PYG medium (5 g of peptone, 10 g of yeast extract, 10 g of glucose, 5 g of tryptone, 40 mg of K2HPO4, 19.2 mg of MgSO4.7 (H2O), 8 mg of CaCl2, 40 mg of KH2PO4, 0.4 g of NaHCO3, 80 mg of NaCl and 1.1 mg of FeSO4.7 H2O) or M9 (AMRESCO-J863) media. Each engineered E. coli strain, including PET30a, HMT, MMT, TMT, OmpC, OmpC-HMT, OmpC-MMT and OmpC-TMT (Table 2), were grown in medium supplemented with 30 μg/mL kanamycin at 37°C. When culture density reached O.D. 0.6, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to for a final culture concentration of 0.6 mM. After eight hours of incubation, cells were harvested for tolerance experiments. All solvent concentrations in media are reported as% (v/v).
Tolerance assay of toxins
Reactive oxygen species detected by carboxy-H2DCFDA under n-butanol stress
The engineered E. coli strains were pre-cultured in PYG medium containing 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2% and 2.5% n-butanol. Aliquots of 100 μl of pre-cultured strains were each re-suspended in 5 ml M9 medium; 140 μl of each diluted sample was transferred to a 96-well plate followed by incubation at 37°C for 45 min. The assay method was adapted from a previous study . All samples were treated with 10 μl of 25 mM carboxy-H2DCFDA (Invitrogen, Co., Carlsbad, CA) and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The optical density at 600 nm and the fluorescence excitation/emission at 535/600 nm of each sample were measured by a plate reader. Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) is a known stressor that produces intracellular H2O2; a set of positive controls for the ROS assay were prepared with the strains cultured without n-butanol and treated by same steps as above except with an initial 45 min incubation of 10 μl of 7.78 M TBHP.
Reactive oxygen species
Medium containing peptone, yeast extract and glucose
This work was supported by grants (NSC 98-2627-M-005-001-, NSC 99-2627-M-005-001-, NSC 100-2627-M-005-001-) from the National Science Council and the ATU Plan from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan.
- Ezeji TC, Qureshi N, Blaschek HP: Bioproduction of butanol from biomass: from genes to bioreactors. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007, 18: 220-227. 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.04.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zverlov VV, Berezina O, Velikodvorskaya GA, Schwarz WH: Bacterial acetone and butanol production by industrial fermentation in the Soviet Union: use of hydrolyzed agricultural waste for biorefinery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006, 71: 587-597. 10.1007/s00253-006-0445-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bowles LK, Ellefson WL: Effects of butanol on Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985, 50: 1165-1170.Google Scholar
- Knoshaug EP, Zhang M: Butanol tolerance in a selection of microorganisms. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009, 153: 13-20. 10.1007/s12010-008-8460-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Isaac DD, Pinkner JS, Hultgren SJ, Silhavy TJ: The extracytoplasmic adaptor protein CpxP is degraded with substrate by DegP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 17775-17779. 10.1073/pnas.0508936102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ingram LO: Microbial tolerance to alcohols: role of the cell membrane. Trends Biotechnol. 1986, 4: 40-44. 10.1016/0167-7799(86)90152-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aono R, Nakajima H: [Organic solvent tolerance in Escherichia coli]. Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso. 1997, 42: 2532-2541.Google Scholar
- Ingram LO, Buttke TM: Effects of alcohols on micro-organisms. Adv Microb Physiol. 1985, 25: 253-300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kabelitz N, Santos PM, Heipieper HJ: Effect of aliphatic alcohols on growth and degree of saturation of membrane lipids in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003, 220: 223-227. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00103-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ingram LO: Ethanol tolerance in bacteria. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 1989, 9: 305-319. 10.3109/07388558909036741.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asako H, Nakajima H, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi M, Aono R: Organic solvent tolerance and antibiotic resistance increased by overexpression of marA in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 1428-1433.Google Scholar
- Tomas CA, Beamish J, Papoutsakis ET: Transcriptional Analysis of Butanol Stress and Tolerance in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 2006-2018. 10.1128/JB.186.7.2006-2018.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brynildsen MP, Liao JC: An integrated network approach identifies the isobutanol response network of Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol. 2009, 5: 277-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez R, Tao H, Purvis JE, York SW, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO: Gene array-based identification of changes that contribute to ethanol tolerance in ethanologenic Escherichia coli: comparison of KO11 (parent) to LY01 (resistant mutant). Biotechnol Prog. 2003, 19: 612-623. 10.1021/bp025658q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rutherford BJ, Dahl RH, Price RE, Szmidt HL, Benke PI, Mukhopadhyay A, Keasling JD: Functional genomic study of exogenous n-butanol stress in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76: 1935-1945. 10.1128/AEM.02323-09.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Atsumi S, Wu TY, Machado IM, Huang WC, Chen PY, Pellegrini M, Liao JC: Evolution, genomic analysis, and reconstruction of isobutanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol. 2010, 6: 449-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones DP: Radical-free biology of oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008, 295: C849-C868. 10.1152/ajpcell.00283.2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Imlay JA: Pathways of oxidative damage. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003, 57: 395-418. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090938.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fridovich I: Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995, 64: 97-112. 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000525.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Coyle P, Philcox JC, Carey LC, Rofe AM: Metallothionein: the multipurpose protein. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002, 59: 627-647. 10.1007/s00018-002-8454-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vallee BL: The function of metallothionein. Neurochem Int. 1995, 27: 23-33. 10.1016/0197-0186(94)00165-Q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park JD, Liu Y, Klaassen CD: Protective effect of metallothionein against the toxicity of cadmium and other metals(1). Toxicology. 2001, 163: 93-100. 10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00375-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sato M, Kondoh M: Recent studies on metallothionein: protection against toxicity of heavy metals and oxygen free radicals. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2002, 196: 9-22. 10.1620/tjem.196.9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan KM: Metallothionein: Potential biomarker for monitoring heavy metal pollution in fish around Hong Kong. Mar Pollut Bull. 1995, 31: 411-415. 10.1016/0025-326X(95)00125-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wong CK, Yeung HY, Cheung RY, Yung KK, Wong MH: Ecotoxicological assessment of persistent organic and heavy metal contamination in Hong Kong coastal sediment. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2000, 38: 486-493. 10.1007/s002449910064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin KH, Chien MF, Hsieh JL, Huang CC: Mercury resistance and accumulation in Escherichia coli with cell surface expression of fish metallothionein. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010, 87: 561-569. 10.1007/s00253-010-2466-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruhl J, Schmid A, Blank LM: Selected Pseudomonas putida strains able to grow in the presence of high butanol concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009, 75: 4653-4656. 10.1128/AEM.00225-09.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dien B, Cotta M, Jeffries T: Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003, 63: 258-266. 10.1007/s00253-003-1444-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Casadei MA, Ingram R, Hitchings E, Archer J, Gaze JE: Heat resistance of Bacillus cereus, Salmonella typhimurium and Lactobacillus delbrueckii in relation to pH and ethanol. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001, 63: 125-134. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00465-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kataoka N, Tajima T, Kato J, Rachadech W, Vangnai AS: Development of butanol-tolerant Bacillus subtilis strain GRSW2-B1 as a potential bioproduction host. AMB Express. 2011, 1: 10-10.1186/2191-0855-1-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin YL, Blaschek HP: Butanol Production by a Butanol-Tolerant Strain of Clostridium acetobutylicum in Extruded Corn Broth. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983, 45: 966-973.Google Scholar
- Brown SD, Guss AM, Karpinets TV, Parks JM, Smolin N, Yang S, Land ML, Klingeman DM, Bhandiwad A, Rodriguez M, et al: Mutant alcohol dehydrogenase leads to improved ethanol tolerance in Clostridium thermocellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 13752-13757. 10.1073/pnas.1102444108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perrone GG, Tan SX, Dawes IW: Reactive oxygen species and yeast apoptosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1783: 1354-1368. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.01.023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sigler K, Chaloupka J, Brozmanova J, Stadler N, Hofer M: Oxidative stress in microorganisms--I. Microbial vs. higher cells--damage and defenses in relation to cell aging and death. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999, 44: 587-624. 10.1007/BF02825650.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trautwein K, Kuhner S, Wohlbrand L, Halder T, Kuchta K, Steinbuchel A, Rabus R: Solvent stress response of the denitrifying bacterium “Aromatoleum aromaticum” strain EbN1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 2267-2274. 10.1128/AEM.02381-07.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kempf B, Bremer E: Uptake and synthesis of compatible solutes as microbial stress responses to high-osmolality environments. Arch Microbiol. 1998, 170: 319-330. 10.1007/s002030050649.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landfald B, Strom AR: Choline-glycine betaine pathway confers a high level of osmotic tolerance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1986, 165: 849-855.Google Scholar
- Yang JN, Wang C, Guo C, Peng XX, Li H: Outer membrane proteome and its regulation networks in response to glucose concentration changes in Escherichia coli. Mol Biosyst. 2011, 7: 3087-3093. 10.1039/c1mb05193h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ingram LO, Aldrich HC, Borges AC, Causey TB, Martinez A, Morales F, Saleh A, Underwood SA, Yomano LP, York SW, et al: Enteric bacterial catalysts for fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol Prog. 1999, 15: 855-866. 10.1021/bp9901062.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Almeida JR, Bertilsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Gorsich S, Liden G: Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009, 82: 625-638. 10.1007/s00253-009-1875-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mills TY, Sandoval NR, Gill RT: Cellulosic hydrolysate toxicity and tolerance mechanisms in Escherichia coli. Biotechnology for biofuels. 2009, 2: 26-10.1186/1754-6834-2-26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borden JR, Papoutsakis ET: Dynamics of genomic-library enrichment and identification of solvent tolerance genes for Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 3061-3068. 10.1128/AEM.02296-06.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.