Open Access

Improving xylose utilization by recombinant Zymomonas mobilisstrain 8b through adaptation using 2-deoxyglucose

  • Ali Mohagheghi1Email author,
  • Jeff Linger1,
  • Holly Smith1,
  • Shihui Yang1,
  • Nancy Dowe1 and
  • Philip T Pienkos1
Biotechnology for Biofuels20147:19

DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-19

Received: 31 July 2013

Accepted: 14 January 2014

Published: 1 February 2014



Numerous attempts have been made to improve xylose utilization in Z. mobilis including adaptive approaches. However, no one has yet found a way to overcome the reduced xylose utilization observed in fermentations carried out in the presence of glucose as well as the inhibitory compounds found within pretreated and saccharified biomass. Our goal was to generate Z. mobilis strains that are more robust than the wildtype strain with increased productivity in fermenting the glucose and xylose present in PCS. Through adaptation in the presence of 2-deoxyglucose, we have generated Zymomonas mobilis strain #7, which is better suited to utilizing xylose in pretreated corn stover (PCS) fermentations in the presence of both glucose and model inhibitory compounds of acetate and furfural. Strain #7 over performed the parent strain 8b both on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SFF) of PCS and fermentation of saccharified PCS slurry. At 65% neutralized PCS liquor level, strain #7 used 86% of the xylose present in the liquor while strain 8b was not able to ferment the liquor under similar conditions. Similarly, under SSF process conditions with 20% total solids loading of PCS, strain #7 used more than 50% of the xylose present, while strain 8b did not utilize any xylose under this condition. We have further identified genetic alterations in strain #7 in relation to the parental strain 8b that may be responsible for these phenotypic enhancements.


We performed an extended lab-directed evolution of Z. mobilis strain 8b in the presence of acetate and a non-hydrolyzable glucose analogue 2-deoxyglucose. Following the adaptation, we identified and characterized numerous candidate strains and found a dramatic increase in xylose usage not only in shake flask, but also in a controlled PCS fermentation. We re-sequenced the genomes of evolved strains to identify genetic alterations responsible for these improved phenotypes, and identified two mutations that may be key to the improved xylose usage in these strains.


We have generated Z. mobilis strain #7, which can ferment xylose efficiently in the presence of toxins present in pretreated corn stover. Genetic alterations responsible for the improvement have been identified.


Zymomonas Xylose 2-deoxyglucose Pretreated corn stover Adaptation Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation Next generation sequencing (NGS)


The revised Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) set forth by the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 mandates producing increased volumes of renewable fuels to be blended with liquid transportation fuels. Cellulosic ethanol, considered to be an advanced biofuel, is expected to play a significant role in achieving the RSF2. Accordingly, continued pursuit of commercially viable cellulosic ethanol production remains at the forefront of biofuels research despite rising interest in hydrocarbon biofuels.

A particularly attractive ethanologen candidate for producing cellulosic ethanol is the Gram-negative alphaproteobacterium, Zymomonas mobilis (Z. mobilis). Using the Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway [1, 2], Z. mobilis is capable of producing ethanol at a faster rate than many yeasts [35], utilizes very high sugar concentrations [4], and has a naturally high resistance to high ethanol concentrations (up to 13% (v/v)) [6]. In addition, the availability of the Z. mobilis genome sequence [7, 8] facilitates strain improvement efforts. The major drawback of Z. mobilis had been its limited natural range of sugar substrates, consisting only of glucose, fructose, and sucrose [1, 5, 9]. To overcome this limitation, Z. mobilis has been engineered to use xylose [2] and arabinose [10], the second and third most abundant sugars found within pretreated and saccharified corn stover hydrolysate [11].

Numerous attempts have been made to improve xylose utilization in Z. mobilis, including adaptive approaches [2, 12, 13]. However, one problem that has not yet been sufficiently addressed is the reduced xylose usage under real-world conditions (that is, in the presence of glucose as well as the inhibitory compounds found within pretreated and saccharified biomass). For example, our in-house xylose-fermenting strains, including Z. mobilis 8b [2], differ dramatically in their ability to utilize xylose in a pure sugar medium compared to pretreated corn stover (PCS) slurry-containing medium, so attempts to improve xylose usage in pure sugars does not necessarily translate to better fermentative performance when using commercially relevant feedstocks. Two compounds that are commonly present in PCS are acetate and furfural, both of which are very toxic to Z. mobilis[14]. To generate Z. mobilis strains that could utilize xylose efficiently in the presence of glucose and acetate, we performed an extended laboratory-directed evolution of Z. mobilis strain 8b in the presence of acetate and a non-hydrolyzable glucose analog, 2-deoxyglucose, following a similar strategy employed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae[15]. After a prolonged adaptation process, we identified and characterized numerous candidate strains and found a dramatic increase in xylose usage not only in the shake flask, but also in a controlled PCS fermentation. We have recently employed a re-sequencing approach to the genetic loci contributing to acetate tolerance for a Z. mobilis mutant generated through random chemical mutagenesis and turbidostat enrichment [16]. We used the same approach to identify genetic alterations responsible for these improved phenotypes, and identified two mutations that may be key factors for improved xylose usage in these strains.

Results and discussion

We sought to improve xylose utilization of our recombinant Z. mobilis strain 8b in the presence of acetate through serial transfer in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable glucose analog, 2-deoxyglucose, based on the hypothesis that xylose is not able to compete effectively with glucose for transport into the cell. Briefly, 8b was grown continuously and serially transferred when optical density (OD) was above 1 with 10% (v/v) in rich medium (RM) supplemented with xylose, RMX (5%), supplemented with 5.0 g/L acetate and 0.5 to 2.0 g/L 2-deoxyglucose. Acetate was included in our enrichment strategy because it is produced during pretreatment of biomass and it has been shown that xylose-grown cells are more sensitive to this compound than are glucose-grown cells [17]. Thus we chose a strategy that would enrich for spontaneous mutants with alterations in one or both independent phenotypes. After 3 months of daily serial transfer, 20 colonies were isolated and revived as monocultures in RMX. Subsequently, the 20 isolates were screened for improved xylose utilization by growing in RMX (10%) in a shake flask with an initial pH of 5.8 and a temperature of 33°C for 48 hours. There was a variation of xylose usage among the strains ranging from approximately 60% to 80% compared to 8b, which used 40% of the xylose (Figure 1). In subsequent screening trials, three isolates, sub-strains #7, #18, and #21, had a higher xylose utilization rate than 8b when grown in RMX (10%) (data not shown). In some cases, this improved xylose usage was near two-fold over the parental strain (8b) suggesting that our strategy was very effective at improving xylose utilization.
Figure 1

Xylose utilization of different strains in rich medium supplemented with xylose (RMX) (10%), pH 5.8 and temperature 33°C, in 125-mL shake flasks. Three strains with higher xylose utilization were selected for Bioscreen C testing: #7, #18, and #21.

We were also interested in understanding the ability of these new strains to utilize xylose in the presence of acetate, which was part of our selection strategy as well as the well-established inhibitory compound, furfural. Acetate and furfural represent two prominent inhibitors that are produced during pretreatment of biomass. Accordingly, evaluating the effect of these inhibitors was critical. We compared their performance using Bioscreen C with RMX (2%) supplemented with inhibitors. In the presence of inhibitors, it is clear that the adapted strains were much more effective at utilizing xylose, particularly in the presence of acetate (Figure 2). Interestingly, in the absence of inhibitors, as Figure 2 shows, there is very little difference in xylose usage among the strains at the end of fermentation but the rate may be faster for adapted strains, suggesting 8b only has difficulties in the rate of xylose utilization. Figure 3 shows the calculated maximum specific growth rate (μm) of all strains in rich medium supplemented with glucose, RMG (2%), and RMX (2%) in the presence or absence of the inhibitory compounds, acetate and furfural. Interestingly, with glucose as the sole carbon source, 8b has an equivalent or greater growth rate than all three adapted strains, either in the absence or presence of inhibitory compounds. Conversely, the growth rate of the adapted strains surpasses the parental 8b strain in all media containing xylose. Based on these results and additional analyses (data not shown) of the adapted mutants, we concluded that #7 was the best performer of all candidate strains and the remainder of our research focuses on this strain.
Figure 2

Comparison of percent xylose utilization by strains 8b, #7, #18, and #21 in BioScreen C, initial pH 5.8, temperature 33°C, after 48 hours fermentation. With Acetate (3.33 g/L); W/Furfural (1.67 g/L).

Figure 3

Growth rate comparison of strains 8b, #7, #18, and #21 in rich medium supplemented with glucose (RMG) (2%) or with xylose (RMX) (2%) using BioScreen C, initial pH 5.8, temperature 33°C, after 48 hours fermentation. With Acetate (3.3 g/L); W/Furfural (1.67 g/L).

Given that xylose usage in pure sugar medium is not necessarily an indicator of commercially relevant fermentative ability, we further assessed the fermentative performance of strain #7 in process-relevant conditions. Figures 4 and 5 summarize the fermentation of the saccharified slurry prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis of ammonia neutralized corn stover hydrolysate in both 55% and 65% (v/v) conditions. These concentrations correspond to total solids loading of 18% and 21%. Clearly, strain #7 outperformed 8b in the case of 55% liquor by drastically improving xylose usage and ethanol production. At the 65% loading, the difference between 8b and #7 was even more dramatic. Although the performance of #7 was partially inhibited by this higher concentration relative to the 55% (v/v) condition, it was still able to grow and utilize both glucose and xylose. Strikingly however, Strain 8b was entirely unable to grow in the 65% neutralized liquor (Figure 5). It is important to note that in fermentation, solids loading is a critical element in the overall cost of production because this parameter is a determinant of fermentation capacity and thus contributes to capital costs.
Figure 4

Fermentation profile for strain 8b and #7 grown on 55% ammonia neutralized pretreated corn stover (PCS) liquor, pH 5.8, temperature 33°C. Gluc, glucose; Xyl, xylose; EtOH, ethanol.

Figure 5

Fermentation profile for strain #7 grown on 65% ammonia neutralized pretreated corn stover (PCS) liquor, pH 5.8, temperature 33°C. Strain 8b was unable to grow in this medium, and as such, the data are not plotted. Gluc, glucose; Xyl, xylose; EtOH, ethanol.

We further assessed the fermentative performance of strain #7 in a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) configuration (Figure 6). Again, it was clear that strain #7 outperforms the parental strain 8b in glucose usage, xylose usage, and ethanol production under these process conditions. During the SSF process, 8b loses viability, which causes glucose accumulation. We have hypothesized that the failure of 8b to perform in SSF configuration is due to the impact of inhibitors, especially acetate, during the early stages of fermentation where xylose (released by hydrolysis of hemicellulose during the pretreatment process) is the major carbon source available to the cells. Figure 7 summarizes the xylose usage between the strains in the different conditions. In 55% (v/v) neutralized liquor, strain #7 utilized 92% of xylose compared with 32% for 8b. On 65% (v/v) neutralized liquor, strain #7 utilized around 86% of xylose whereas strain 8b was unable to grow. Similarly, in the SSF experiment (Figure 6) strain #7 had 52% xylose utilization whereas strain 8b had less than 5%.
Figure 6

Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) profile for strain 8b and #7 on 17.5% total solids (TS) (W/V) whole slurry pretreated corn stover, pH 5.8, temperature 33°C. Gluc: glucose; Xyl: xylose; EtOH: ethanol.

Figure 7

Xylose utilization and cell number for strain 8b and #7 grown on 55% and 65% ammonia neutralized liquor and 17.5% total solids (TS) simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). CFU, colony-forming units.

To further understand the problems underlying the fermentation differences between 8b and strain #7, we sought to determine if 8b had reduced growth in response to these conditions. To assay for cell density in the presence of the dark-colored slurry, we performed cell counts at the end of fermentation by plating the culture using serial dilution protocol (Figure 7). The results are quite clear in that strain #7 had increased in cell density substantially more than 8b in all conditions. This is particularly true in the case of the 65% (v/v) liquor fermentation (Figure 6), where we were unable to detect any viable cells of strain 8b, and in the SSF trial (Figure 7), where we were able to detect very few. This suggests that the reduced fermentative capability of 8b in relation to strain #7 is a result of growth inhibition in the harsh conditions of these fermentations.

Given the vastly improved fermentative performance of strain #7 over 8b in regards to xylose utilization and the tolerance of inhibitors, we wanted to identify the underlying genetic basis for this improved phenotype. We used Next Generation Sequencing technologies (NGS) to re-sequence the genome of both 8b and strains #7 and #18. The results of this re-sequencing revealed that despite months of selective pressure adaption, strains #7 and #18 were genetically identical (and therefore likely to be re-isolates of a variant to come to dominate the adapted culture) and had acquired only two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in relation to 8b. The first resides in the intergenic region between the divergently expressed ZMO0959 and ZMO0061. According to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ZMO0959 encodes a monofunctional biosynthetic peptidoglycan transglycosylase, (NCBI) and ZMO0961 encodes a cytochrome c class 1 enzyme. It is not yet apparent whether these SNP changes within the intergenic regions would affect gene transcription of either of these enzymes, and it is conceptually difficult to attribute the observed phenotypes to either or both of these genes. On the contrary, the second identified SNP occurs within the coding sequence of ZMO0774, which encodes a LysR transcriptional regulator. Although the exact functions of this gene product are unclear, it is likely that it exerts transcriptional regulation on genes important for surviving these conditions.


Through adaptive approaches, we have successfully generated a Z. mobilis strain that is better suited to utilizing xylose in PCS fermentations in the presence of both glucose and model inhibitory compounds of acetate and furfural. We have further identified genetic alterations in strain #7 in relation to the parental strain 8b that may be responsible for these phenotypic enhancements. Future research will be designed to definitively correlate one or both of these genetic mutations to the enhanced xylose usage phenotype seen in the newly generated strains. It will be interesting to return to our frozen stocks taken throughout the enrichment period to determine when the two mutations occurred and to see if one or both is needed for the phenotypes observed. However our current hypothesis is that the mutation in the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (ZMO0774) might be the underlying mutation responsible. The mutation is found within the promoter region of ZMO0774, indicating that altered expression levels of this transcription factor may play a very central role in improved xylose utilization in the context of fermentations. LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) represent the most abundant type of transcriptional regulator in the prokaryotic kingdom [18, 19], thus making it nearly impossible to predict the function of this particular LTTR. It will be interesting to ascertain the global transcriptional differences in strains harboring this mutation to identify the end gene expression changes resulting in enhanced xylose usage in our strains. Further clues as to the general role of LTTRs in stress response have recently been identified by Xiao-hong Su’s laboratory. Specifically, they found ZMO0774 to be transcriptionally upregulated in the presence of furfural [20] and high concentrations of ethanol [18].

Materials and methods

Strain and growth media

Z. mobilis 8b was used in this study [2]. Where indicated, Z. mobilis strains were grown in RM 1% (w/v) yeast extract, and 0.2% KH2PO4, and carbon source in any given medium is indicated either by G (glucose) or X (xylose), followed by the percentage. For example, RMG (5%) indicates RM supplemented with 5% glucose.

Pretreated PCS for whole slurry fermentation

Corn stover was pretreated in a 200-kg/d horizontal pretreatment reactor at a solids loading of 30% (w/w), temperature of 158°C, 0.0224 g H2SO4/g dry stover (15.9 mg/g pretreatment process + 6.5 mg/g for oligomer conversion), and an approximate residence time of 5 minutes. Oligomer conversion was performed in a separate reaction vessel for 20 minutes at 130°C. This lot of PCS was designated BPI091217, Drum 4. The pH was adjusted from 2.0 to 5.0 with 30% ammonium hydroxide and then transferred into a 2-L Schott bottle and diluted with water to a final concentration of 20% total solids, after accounting for enzyme addition [11].

Enzymatic hydrolysis of pH-adjusted PCS

The pH-adjusted PCS slurry was enzymatically hydrolyzed with Cellic CTec 2 cellulase enzyme (Novozymes, Davis, CA, USA). The enzyme was added at 40 mg protein/g cellulose and incubated at 48°C and 200 rpm for 4 days. When hydrolysis was complete, the saccharified PCS slurry was transferred into the bioreactors for fermentation [21].

Sub-strain #7 development

Sub-strain #7 was developed for faster xylose utilization by exposing the strain 8b to a non-metabolized analog, 2-deoxyglucose (0.5 to 2 g/L), in RMX (5%) media. The adaptation was done in 15 mL Falcon tubes with 10 mL media, initial pH of 5.8, and incubated with no shaking at 33°C. After adaptation on RMX supplemented with 2-deoxyglucose, the sub-strain was further adapted on RMX (5%) supplemented with 5 g/L acetate in the presence of 2 g/L 2-deoxyglucose. The final culture was streaked on RMX and 20 colonies were isolated and frozen at -70°C for further evaluation. After further evaluation, the number of sub-strains was narrowed down to three: #7, #18, and #21.

Sub-strain screenings using Bioscreen C

We used a Bioscreen C analyzer (Growth Curves, Piscataway, NJ, USA) to measure growth rates of sub-strains in the presence of acetic acid and furfural [14]. The Bioscreen C instrument includes an incubator that provides constant temperature and mixing by linear shaking. Turbidity was measured using a wide-band (420 to 580 nm) filter, which is less sensitive to changes in the medium color. The analyzer can read two 100-well sterile honeycomb plates with covers for multiple measurements of microbial growth curves. Turbidometric measurements were made every 10 minutes during the course of the run using RM medium with 2% (w/v) glucose and 2% (w/v) xylose and containing the inhibitors furfural and acetate. Log-phase cultures of selected strains were obtained by inoculating overnight cultures in RMGX (8%:2%) at 33°C and allowing the cells to grow to an OD600nm of approximately 4.0, which corresponds to 3% to 4% glucose remaining in the medium. Cells were then distributed to Bioscreen C microplates containing media as described to a starting cell density of OD600nm = 0.05. Operation of the Bioscreen C and collection of turbidity measurements (OD420–580nm) were computer automated with EZ Experiment (Norden Logic Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Data were collected and exported to Microsoft Excel spreadsheets and then the growth rate was calculated.

Seed cultures

Z. mobilis 8b and sub-strains #7, #18, and #21 were taken from cell stocks stored at -70°C. The pre-seed medium used was RMGX (8%:2%). The strains were revived by transferring 1 mL of the frozen stock into 9 mL of pre-seed medium in a 15-mL tube. The cultures were incubated at 33°C with no agitation and then sampled at 8 hours for an optical density reading at 600 nm using Spectronic 601 spectrophotometer (Milton Roy, Ivyland, PA, USA). The pre-seed culture was used to inoculate the seed flask with media composition of RMGX (8%:2%, w/v) or the batch seed fermentor, if needed, with media composition of RM (1×), 150 g/L glucose, 20 g/L xylose, and 1 g/L sorbitol. Temperature was controlled at 33°C and pH at 5.8 by 4 M KOH.

Fermentation for evaluation of adapted strains

Fermentations to evaluate the strains on neutralized saccharified whole slurry and SSF were performed in BioStat-Q Plus fermentors at a 300-mL working volume using Z. mobilis strain 8b and evolved strain #7. RM was added to enzymatically hydrolyzed whole slurry (20% total solids) or to mixture of solids and enzyme in the case of SSF. The fermentors were inoculated at an OD600nm of approximately 1.0 using a direct transfer procedure (10% v/v). The fermentation was conducted at 33°C, pH 5.8 controlled with 4 M KOH, and an agitation speed of 300 rpm. The fermentation was typically finished in 72 hours. Ethanol yield calculations were based on initial glucose, xylose, and fructose concentrations and differences between initial and final ethanol concentration.

Cell viability

Cell viability was measured using serial dilution protocol in which the fermentation broth was diluted in RM up to 10-7, then plated on RMG (2%) plates. The plates were incubated at 30°C in an incubator oven and after colony formation the colony numbers were counted.

Sampling/data collection/analysis

Samples from the fermentations were taken at various time points. The samples were centrifuged and filtered through a 0.2-μm syringe filter before placing in high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) vials. Analysis of fermentation samples has been described previously [22]. Briefly, the samples were analyzed for carbohydrates and organic acids by HPLC using the Shodex SP0810 carbohydrate column and the Biorad Aminex HPX-87H organic acids column. Sugar utilization, ethanol yield, and ethanol titers were calculated based on these HPLC data. We also determined the insoluble solids in the slurry and the density of the liquor for the initial and final time points [23].

Genomic resequencing of the adapted strain through next-generation sequencing (NGS)

Genomic DNA was extracted using Qiagen DNAEasy Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and sent to the University of Utah for next-generation sequencing using Illumina Hiseq2000 (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA) after passing the quality requirements. The quality of FASTQ genome resequencing data delivered from the University of Utah was checked using the FastQC program; data passing the quality control were imported into CLC Genomics Workbench 5.1 for data analysis to identity the potential small genetic changes such as SNP and Indels.



colony-forming units




high pressure liquid chromatography


LysR-type transcriptional regulator


National Center for Biotechnology Information


next generation sequencing


optical density


pretreated corn stover


revised renewable fuel standard


rich medium


rich medium supplemented with glucose


rich medium supplemented with xylose


single nucleotide polymorphism


simultaneous saccharification and fermentation.



We would like to acknowledge funding support from the BioEnergy Technologies Office (BETO), a subdivision within the Department of Energy’s office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). We would also like to thank Mary Ann Franden for her help on Bioscreen evaluation.

Authors’ Affiliations

National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory


  1. Dawes EA, Ribbons DW, Large PJ: The route of ethanol formation in Zymomonas mobilis. Biochem J. 1966, 98: 795-803.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang M, Eddy C, Deanda K, Finkelstein M, Picataggio S: Metabolic engineering of a pentose metabolism pathway in ethanologenic Zymomonas mobilis. Science. 1995, 267: 240-243. 10.1126/science.267.5195.240.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee KJ, Rogers PL: The fermentation kinetics of ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis. Chem Eng J. 1983, 27: B31-B38. 10.1016/0300-9467(83)80067-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rogers PL, Lee KJ, Tribe DE: Kinetics of alcohol production by Zymomonas mobilis at high sugar concentrations. Biotechnol Lett. 1979, 1: 165-170. 10.1007/BF01388142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sprenger GA: Carbohydrate metabolism in Zymomonas mobilis: a catabolic highway with some scenic routes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996, 145: 301-307. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08593.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Loos H, Kramer R, Sahm H, Sprenger GA: Sorbitol promotes growth of Zymomonas mobilis in environments with high concentrations of sugar: evidence for a physiological function of glucose-fructose oxidoreductase in osmoprotection. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 7688-7693.Google Scholar
  7. Seo J-S, Chong H, Park HS, Yoon K-O, Jung C, Kim JJ, Hong JH, Kim H, Kim J-H, Kil J-I, Park CJ OHHM, Lee J-S, Jin S-J, Um H-W, Lee H-J OHS-J, Kim JY, Kang HL, Lee SY, Lee KJ, Kang HS: The genome sequence of the ethanologenic bacterium Zymomonas mobilis ZM4. Nat Biotechnol. 2005, 23: 63-68. 10.1038/nbt1045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Yang S, Pappas KM, Hauser LJ, Land ML, Chen G-L, Hurs GB, Pan C, Kouvelis VN, Typas MA, Pelletier DA, Klingeman DM, Chang Y-J, Samatova NF, Brown SD: Improved genome annotation for Zymomonas mobilis. Nat Biotechnol. 2009, 27: 893-894. 10.1038/nbt1009-893.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawes EA, Ribbons DW, Rees DA: Sucrose utilization by Zymomonas mobilis: formation of a levan. Biochem J. 1966, 98: 804-812.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Deanda K, Zhang M, Eddy C, Picataggio S: Development of an arabinose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis strain by metabolic pathway engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 4465-4470.Google Scholar
  11. Schell DJ, Farmer J, Newman M, McMillan JD: Dilute-sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover in pilot-scale reactor: investigation of yields, kinetics, and enzymatic digestibilities of solids. App Biochem Biotechnol. 2003, 105–108: 69-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Agrawal M, Mao ZC, Chen RR: Adaptation yields a highly efficient xylose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis strain. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011, 108: 777-785. 10.1002/bit.23021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. De Graaf AA, Striegel K, Wittig RM, Laufer B, Schmitz G, Wiechert W, Sprenger GA, Sahm H: Metabolic state of Zymomonas mobilis in glucose-, fructose-, and xylose-fed continuous cultures as analysed by C-13- and P-31-NMR spectroscopy. Arch Microbiol. 1999, 171: 371-385. 10.1007/s002030050724.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Franden MA, Pienkos PT, Zhang M: Development of a high-throughput method to evaluate the impact of inhibitory compounds from lignocellulosic hydrolysates on the growth of Zymomonas mobilis. J Biotechnol. 2009, 144: 259-267. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.08.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Parihardi K, Kazuo T, Shuzo T: Enhancement of xylose uptake in 2-deoxyglucose tolerant mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosciences and Bioengineering. 2011, 111: 557-563. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.12.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang S, Land ML, Klingeman DM, Pelletier DA, T-YS LU, Martin SL, Guo H-B, Smith JC, Brown SD: Paradigm for industrial strain improvement identifies sodium acetate tolerance loci in Zymomonas mobilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 10395-10400. 10.1073/pnas.0914506107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Franden MA, Heidi MP, Mohagheghi A, Pienkos PT, Zhang M: Inhibition of growth of Zymomonas mobilis model compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013, 6: 99-10.1186/1754-6834-6-99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. He M-X, Wu B, Shui Z-X, Q-C HU, Wang W-G, Tan F-R, Tang X-Y, Zhu Q-L, Pan K, Li Q, Su X-H: Transcriptome profiling of Zymomonas mobilis under furfural stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012, 95: 189-199. 10.1007/s00253-012-4155-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Maddocks SE, Oyston PCF: Structure and function of the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) family proteins. Microbiology. 2008, 154: 3609-3623. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/022772-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. He M-X, Wu B, Shui Z-X, Q-C HU, Wang W-G, Tan F-R, Tang X-Y, Zhu Q-L, Pan K, Li Q, Su X-H: Transcriptome profiling of Zymomonas mobilis under ethanol stress. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012, 5: 75-10.1186/1754-6834-5-75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen X, Tao L, Shekiro J, Mohagheghi A, Decker S, Wang W, Smith H, Park S, Himmel M, Tucker M: Improved ethanol yield and reduced minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) by modifying low severity dilute acid pretreatment with deacetylation and mechanical refining: 1) Experimental. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012, 5: 60-10.1186/1754-6834-5-60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D: Determination ofsugars, by-products and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples. 2006, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-510-42623Google Scholar
  23. Sluiter JB, Ruiz RO, Scarlata CJ, Sluiter AD, Templeton DW: Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 1. Review and description of methods. J Agric Food Chem. 2010, 58: 9043-9053. 10.1021/jf1008023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Mohagheghi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.