Skip to main content

Table 2 Chemical composition of the raw materials before steam pretreatment (% dry weight) (Carbohydrates and lignin analysis were completed prior to extraction)

From: How effective are traditional methods of compositional analysis in providing an accurate material balance for a range of softwood derived residues?

 

Arabinan

Galactan

Glucan

Xylan

Mannan

Lignin

Extractives***

Ash****

Sum

Acid insoluble

Acid soluble

BKLPP*

1.6 (0.2)**

2.7 (0.2)

42.4 (0.3)

5.9 (0.6)

11.4 (0.1)

28.2 (0.8)

0.4 (0.0)

3.8 (0.2)

0.1 (0.0)

97.4 (1.1)

IFS

1.9 (0.0)

5.6 (0.1)

36.1 (0.8)

6.6 (0.1)

9.9 (0.2)

33.3 (0.4)

0.6 (0.0)

6.3 (1.1)

0.1 (0.0)

99.1 (1.5)

LR

2.4 (0.3)

3.0 (0.1)

33.6 (1.0)

5.5 (0.2)

7.8 (0.2)

38.6 (0.7)

1.1 (0.1)

9.4 (0.0)

0.4 (0.2)

102.3 (1.4)

HOG I

1.8 (0.1)

1.8 (0.1)

29.6 (0.3)

4.5 (0.0)

6.0 (0.2)

42.8 (0.1)

1.2 (.1)

6.2 (0.2)

6.9 (0.0)

100.7 (0.5)

HOG II

1.2 (0.0)

1.9 (0.0)

37.5 (0.7)

4.6 (0.1)

7.9 (0.2)

39.7 (0.2)

1.0 (0.1)

5.7 (0.3)

2.9 (0.1)

102.1 (0.8)

BARK

6.4 (0.0)

3.5 (0.0)

19.2 (0.0)

3.1 (0.0)

1.5 (0.0)

52.7 (0.5)

1.2 (0.0)

19.0 (1.5)

2.0 (0.2)

109.2 (1.6)

  1. *BKLPP refers to Beetle-killed lodge pole pine white wood; IFS is Interface Fire Slash (or Forest Thinnings); LR refers to Logging Residue.
  2. HOG I & II are two different types of hog fuels collected from Nippon Paper. Hog I is more bark intensive. Bark samples are sourced from lodge pole pine wood.
  3. **Values in the bracket represent the standard deviations of triplicate analysis.
  4. ***Extractive values reported are from a separate analysis and the quantification of other biomass components were carried out on the raw material without any prior extraction.
  5. ****Ash values reported are from biomass samples prior to extraction.