Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of hydrogen production using various types of low-cost materials as substrate

From: Optimization of key factors affecting hydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse by a thermophilic anaerobic pure culture

Microorganism

Cultivation method

Temperature

Substrate

H2yield (mol H2/mol hexose)

HPR (L/L·h)

Ref.

Clostridium paraputrificum M-21

Batch

45

Corn fiber

1.1

-

[29]

C. bifermentans

Batch

35

Wastewater sludge

2.1a

-

[30]

Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus

Batch

70

Hydrolyzed potato steam peels

3.4

0.26d

[28]

C. saccharolyticus

Batch

70

Paper sludge hydrolysate

3.84

0.12

[31]

Thermotoga neapolitana

Batch

80

Hydrolyzed potato steam peels

3.3

0.20d

[28]

Klebsiella oxytoca HP1

Continuous

38

Bagasse

1.60b

0.35

[32]

Clostridium butyricum (immobilized)

Batch

37

Sugarcane juice

1.52

0.14d

[33]

NA

Batch

60

Cow manure

10.25c

0.02

[34]

Seed sludge

Batch

35

Pineapple waste

1.83

0.08e

[35]

Seed sludge

Batch

30-32

Sweet sorghum syrup

2.22

0.05

[4]

C. butyricum

Batch

37

SCB hydrolysate

1.73

0.07

[11]

Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum W16

Batch

60

Corn stover

-

0.25d

[36]

T. aotearoense SCUT27/Δldh

Batch

55

SCB hydrolysate

1.86

0.52

This study

  1. ammol H2/g COD.
  2. bmmol H2/g solid.
  3. cmL H2/g volatile solid.
  4. dObtained by calculation from reported data.
  5. eL H2/g volatile solid/h.