Skip to main content

Table 1 Results for chemical analysis of spent sulfite liquor samples (HPLC – high performance liquid chromatography; MgO – magnesium oxide; CaO – calcium oxide; SSL – spent sulphite liquor; HMF – hydroxyl-methyl-furfural; TPC – total polymeric compounds)

From: Techno-economics of integrating bioethanol production from spent sulfite liquor for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from sulfite pulping mills

 

Unit

MgO-SSL

CaO-SSL

HPLC Measured

 

Amount

Error

Amount

Error

Furfural

g/l

0.29

0.01

0.23

0.01

HMF

mg/l

4.50

0.50

6.00

2.00

Formic Acid

g/l

0.81

0.08

2.21

0.04

Acetic Acid

g/l

4.26

0.35

9.02

0.15

Glucose

g/l

1.38

0.06

2.78

0.06

Xylose

g/l

18.25

1.16

27.68

0.45

Arabinose

g/l

0.86

0.07

1.18

0.01

Phenolics

mg/l

48.55

2.86

23.85

1.40

Solids

%

10.95

0.05

14.39%

0.10%

Ash

% of Solids

10.34

1.25

8.76%

0.00%

Elemental Composition

     

Carbon

%

5.78

0.25

8.41%

0.29

Hydrogen

%

10.32

0.36

9.46%

0.34

Nitrogen

%

0.59

0.16

0.23%

Maximuma

Sulphur

%

1.45

0.13

2.64%

Maximuma

Oxygen

%

81.86

Difference

81.18%

Difference

Calculated TPC

%

8.99%

 

13.70%

 
  1. aThe elemental analyser measures organic sulphur and nitrogen by the SO2 and nitric oxides respectively, which are generated during combustion of the sample. The CaO ash generated during the combustion of Ca SSL absorbs acidic gasses [19], which then causes variability in the sulphur and nitrogen in this particular sample. Thus, the maximum value is reported as a conservative measure. Since the Ca SSL is only considered for biodigestion of the non-recalcitrant sugars, with no further processing, this result does not affect the outcomes of the simulations in any way.