Skip to main content

Table 8 OTUs that contribute >4 % to Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between inoculum communities (T6) and control (T7) communities

From: Preservation of microbial communities enriched on lignocellulose under thermophilic and high-solid conditions

Reactor

Abundance in T6 sample (%)

Abundance in T7 sample (%)

% Contribution to dissimilarity

OTU classificationa

R20

17.96

5.45

18.19

g__Sphingobacteriales

R20

5.55

0.84

6.85

g__Roseiflexales (OTU 10)

R20

0.06

4.76

6.83

g__Alkalilimnicola

R20

5.57

1.08

6.54

k__Bacteria

R20

0.21

4.11

5.66

g__Rhizobiales

R20

1.52

5.13

5.25

g__Pseudoxanthomonas

R21

6.93

15.39

22.55

g__Micromonosporaceae

R21

15.08

9.41

15.13

g__Sphingobacteriales

R21

3.93

7.51

9.55

g__Chelatococcus

R21

5.94

3.32

6.97

g__Roseiflexales (OTU 18)

R21

3.21

1.00

5.89

g__Streptosporangiaceae

R23

11.02

13.05

10.98

c__Anaerolineae

R23

6.27

4.49

9.64

g__Micromonosporaceae

R23

4.83

3.21

8.75

g__Chelatococcus

R23

0.42

1.53

5.99

g__Roseiflexales (OTU 18)

R23

1.44

0.38

5.71

g__Rhizobiales

R23

4.72

5.54

4.46

k__Bacteria

R23

0.77

1.59

4.46

g__Schlegelella

  1. aLetter codes indicate the highest resolved taxonomy from phylogenetic binning: k kingdom, p phylum, c class, o order, f family, g genus