Skip to main content

Table 2 Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test of cell attachment as a function of the materials and their surface textures under rocking conditions

From: Effects of the surface physico-chemical properties and the surface textures on the initial colonization and the attached growth in algal biofilm

Ranking

Material

Surface texture (mesh opening, mm)

Attachment (g m−2)a

Groupsb

1

Nylon

0.50

91.16 ± 10.13

A

2

Polypropylene

1.25

88.25 ± 18.37

A

3

Polyester

0.50

82.59 ± 26.38

AB

4

Polypropylene

0.50

82.34 ± 9.93

AB

5

Polypropylene

0.05

79.24 ± 0.97

AB

6

Polyester

0.05

67.37 ± 16.70

ABC

7

Nylon

0.05

50.28 ± 12.29

BCD

8

Aluminum

0.50

41.13 ± 11.45

CDE

9

Stainless steel

0.50

36.39 ± 9.49

CDEF

10

Polyester

2.50

34.64 ± 11.06

DCEFG

11

Polyester

1.25

33.96 ± 10.67

DEFG

12

Nylon

2.50

33.66 ± 16.45

DEFG

13

Stainless steel

1.25

33.20 ± 2.12

DEFG

14

High-density polyethylene

2.50

25.39 ± 7.12

DEFG

15

Aluminum

1.25

24.73 ± 14.03

DEFG

16

Nylon

1.25

22.43 ± 9.04

DEFG

17

Polypropylene

2.50

21.82 ± 3.98

DEFG

18

High-density polyethylene

0.50

21.24 ± 8.63

DEFG

19

Stainless steel

2.50

15.91 ± 10.45

EFG

20

Aluminum

2.50

15.54 ± 6.19

EFG

21

Aluminum

0.05

14.64 ± 1.91

EFG

22

Polypropylene

6.40

14.23 ± 4.75

EFG

23

Polyester

Smooth

13.19 ± 14.04

EFG

24

High-density polyethylene

6.40

12.77 ± 1.94

EFG

25

Stainless steel

0.05

12.72 ± 4.36

EFG

26

Aluminum

6.40

9.41 ± 2.10

EFG

27

Stainless steel

6.40

6.46 ± 3.67

FG

28

High-density polyethylene

Smooth

6.19 ± 5.19

FG

29

Aluminum

Smooth

4.07 ± 5.10

FG

30

Stainless steel

Smooth

3.27 ± 1.89

G

31

Polypropylene

Smooth

2.40 ± 0.83

G

32

Nylon

Smooth

1.84 ± 1.15

G

  1. aData are mean ± SDs of three replicates
  2. bAttachment with at least one common letter are not significantly (p > 0.05) different