From: An environmentally friendly and productive process for bioethanol production from potato waste
Raw materials | Substrate concentration (w/v) | Pretreatment method | Glucose concentration (g/L) | Ethanol concentration (g/L) | Glucan conversion (%) | Glucose to ethanol conversion (%) | Ethanol yield (g/g, dry weight) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sweet potato residues | 36 % | Enzymatic hydrolysisa | 168.13 ± 2.62 | 79.00 ± 0.87 | 68.34 ± 1.07 | 67.16 ± 0.74 | 0.23 ± 0.00 | This study |
Sweet potato residues | 36 % | Enzymatic hydrolysisb | 153.46 ± 2.01 | 73.37 ± 1.87 | 62.37 ± 0.82 | 62.37 ± 1.59 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | This study |
Potato pulp | 30 % | Hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic pretreatmentc | 114 | Less than 60 | 68 | Less than 68 | Less than 0.2 | [48] |
Potato peel waste | 2 % | Enzymatic hydrolysisd | 18.48 ± 0.65 | 7.50 ± 0.28 | – | – | – | [23] |
Waste potato mash | – | Physical methode | Less than 80 | 35 | – | – | – | [24] |
Potato peel + substandard mash | 1:1 | Enzymatic hydrolysisf | – | 48.6 ± 1.3 | – | 42.5 | 0.19 | [57] |
Potato tuber mash | 1:1 | Acid-catalysed hydrolysisg | 100 | 32.9 | – | – | – | [20] |
Potato peel waste | 4 % | Acid-catalysed hydrolysish | 18.15 | 6.97 | – | – | – | [23] |
Potato starch residue stream | – | Acid-catalysed hydrolysisi | 18.9 | 5.62 ± 0.21 | – | – | – | [21] |