Skip to main content

Table 4 Overall mass and energy balance of the studied biorefinery scenarios

From: Multi-product biorefineries from lignocelluloses: a pathway to revitalisation of the sugar industry?

 

Unit

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

Scenario 3

Scenario 4

Scenario 5

Scenario 6

EtOH

EtOH-LA

EtOH-Fur.

Butanol

Methanol

FT syncrude

Feedstock

 Bypass to boiler

t/h

22.75

26.00

32.50

26.00

22.75

19.50

%

35.00

40.00

50.00

40.00

35.00

30.00

 To biorefinery

t/h

42.25

39.00

32.25

39.00

42.25

45.50

Products

 Ethanol

t/h

11.00

7.48

5.66

0.35

 Lactic acid

t/h

4.65

 Furfural

t/h

2.07

 Butanol

t/h

4.61

 Methanol

t/h

12.76

 Syncrude

t/h

5.80e

 Acetone

t/h

1.50

 Acetic acid

t/h

1.25

 Surplus elc.

MW

7.10

5.60

7.50

4.30

0.50

1.80

Total productiona

t/h

11.00

12.13

9.22c

6.46

12.76

5.80

t/td

0.26

0.31

0.29

0.16

0.30

0.13

Energy demandb

 Cooling

MW

50.70

45.50

52.00

73.10

26.20

33.90

 Heating

MW

69.10

66.60

66.30

61.70

2.60

2.40

 Power

MW

2.00

2.00

2.30

13.70

14.20

13.70

  1. aTotal production of chemicals
  2. bHeat and power demand of sugar mill is excluded
  3. cProduced formic acid is included
  4. dProduction yield: tonne of product(s) per tonne of biomass fed to biorefinery “exclusive of feedstock bypassed to CHP”
  5. eDensity of syncrude = 634.8 kg/m3