Table 6 Analyses of possible chromosome structures for different crossing experiments
From: Proximity ligation scaffolding and comparison of two Trichoderma reesei strains genomes
Crossing experiment | Nb ≠ chr | Total possible structures | Non-viable | Viable | Possible viable structures different from parental ones |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBS999.97 (1-1, re) × CBS999.97 (1-2, wt) or × QM6a | 2 | 22 = 4 | 1 | 3 (75%) | 1 structure with chr II fragment (D-segment) diploidy |
CBS999.97 (1-1, re) × QM9414 | 4 | 24 = 16 | 12 | 4 (25%) | 1 structure with chr II fragment diploidy |
1 structure with chr II fragment diploidy and chr VI fragment diploidy | |||||
CBS999.97 (1-1, re) × Rut-C30 | 5 | 25 = 32 | 23 | 9 (28%) | 1 haploid with QM6a structure, |
1 crossed-haploid, | |||||
4 structures with 1 chr fragment diploidy, | |||||
1 structure with 2 chr fragment diploidy | |||||
QM6a (MAT1-1, ff) × QM6a | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 (100%) | None |
QM6a (MAT1-1, ff) × QM9414 | 3 | 23 = 8 | 6 | 2 (25%) | None |
QM6a (MAT1-1, ff) × Rut-C30 | 3 | 23 = 8 | 5 | 3 (38%) | 1 structure with chr I fragment diploidy |