Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Different annual utility consumption summary for different scenarios

From: How does technology pathway choice influence economic viability and environmental impacts of lignocellulosic biorefineries?

  BE BEEA BEA BET BD BEL
Banagrass
 Power consumption (kW-h) (6,491,000) (7,473,000) (7,079,000) (9,433,000) (9,483,000) (4,472,000)
 Power production (kW-h) 12,604,000 13,576,000 13,308,000 12,878,000 12,979,000 22,563,000
 Steam (MT) (147,000) (183,000) (385,000) (140,000) (141,000)  
 Cooling water (MT) 9,396,000 9,535,000 13,871,000 8,255,000 8,346,000  
 Chilled water (MT) 12,000 1,358,000 4,515,000 1,007,000 1,007,000  
 CT water (MT) 6,637,000 11,647,000 6,206,000 6,469,000 6,469,000  
 Steam high P (MT) (26,000) (26,000) (26,000) (25,000) (25,000)  
 Cryogenic cool (MT)     91,000 91,000  
 Hot water (MT)      9000  
  1. The values within the parenthesis indicates that the utility was produced onsite, and hence a negative value was mentioned
  EE EEEA EEA EET ED EEL
Energycane
 Power consumption (kW-h) (5,684,000) (5,831,000) (6,756,000) (10,918,000) (10,496,000) (4,090,000)
 Power production (KW-h) 17,979,000 19,029,000 19,011,000 18,275,000 18,395,000 32,919,000
 Steam (MT) (153,000) (188,000) (384,000) (133,000) (135,000)  
 Cooling water (MT) 9,231,000 9,739,000 13,892,000 7,777,000 8,312,000  
 Chilled water (MT) 11,000 1,418,000 4,527,000 933,000 934,000  
 CT water (MT) 6,721,000 11,804,000 6,399,000 6,504,000 6,500,000  
 Steam high P (MT) (27,000) (27,000) (25,000) (23,000) (23,000)  
 Cryogenic cool (MT)     81,000 82,000  
 Hot water (MT)      8000  
  1. The values within the parenthesis indicates that the utility was produced onsite, and hence a negative value was mentioned