Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of selected microbial 1,2-PDO producers

From: Valorization of pyrolysis water: a biorefinery side stream, for 1,2-propanediol production with engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum

Organism

Strain, genotype, plasmid

Substrates

Oxygenation

Titer (mM)

Y P/S (mol mol−1)

Process time (h)

Q P (mmol L−1 h−1)

References

C. glutamicum ATCC 13032

PDO2 (Δpqo ΔaceE ΔldhA Δmdh + pJULgldA)

PW (acetol), YE

Aerobic/microaerobic

18

0.96

13

1.40

This studya

C. glutamicum ATCC 13032

∆hdpA ∆ldh + pEKEx3-mgsA-yqhD-gldA

 Glucose

Aerobic

63

0.34

51

1.24

[21]

Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum ATCC 31960

 

Glucose, YE

Anaerobic

119

0.47

28b

4.25

[27]

E. coli MG1655

∆ackA-pta ∆ldhA ∆dhaK +pTHKLcfgldA mgsAyqhD

Glycerol, tryptone, YE

Anaerobic

74

0.26

72

1.02

[28]

E. coli MG1655

NLD294 (∆ldhA) + pNEA36 [mgs, gldA, fucO]

Glucose, YE

Anaerobic

59

 0.45

60

0.99

[29]

Lactobacillus buchneri (LMG 6892T)

 

Lactate

Anaerobic

8

0.45c

 55

0.14

[30]

Saccharomyces cerevisiae YPH499

pESC-URA-mgs & gldA + pESC-LEU-gdh & GUP1

Glycerol, YE, amino acids

Aerobic

29

0.26

96

0.30

[31]

  1. aParameters calculated based on the acetol found in PW
  2. bAssigned from published graphic
  3. cUsed the given 16.5 mM of consumed lactate as basis for calculation