Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Comparison of selected microbial 1,2-PDO producers

From: Valorization of pyrolysis water: a biorefinery side stream, for 1,2-propanediol production with engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum

Organism Strain, genotype, plasmid Substrates Oxygenation Titer (mM) Y P/S (mol mol−1) Process time (h) Q P (mmol L−1 h−1) References
C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 PDO2 (Δpqo ΔaceE ΔldhA Δmdh + pJULgldA) PW (acetol), YE Aerobic/microaerobic 18 0.96 13 1.40 This studya
C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 hdpAldh + pEKEx3-mgsA-yqhD-gldA  Glucose Aerobic 63 0.34 51 1.24 [21]
Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum ATCC 31960   Glucose, YE Anaerobic 119 0.47 28b 4.25 [27]
E. coli MG1655 ackA-ptaldhAdhaK +pTHKLcfgldA mgsAyqhD Glycerol, tryptone, YE Anaerobic 74 0.26 72 1.02 [28]
E. coli MG1655 NLD294 (∆ldhA) + pNEA36 [mgs, gldA, fucO] Glucose, YE Anaerobic 59  0.45 60 0.99 [29]
Lactobacillus buchneri (LMG 6892T)   Lactate Anaerobic 8 0.45c  55 0.14 [30]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae YPH499 pESC-URA-mgs & gldA + pESC-LEU-gdh & GUP1 Glycerol, YE, amino acids Aerobic 29 0.26 96 0.30 [31]
  1. aParameters calculated based on the acetol found in PW
  2. bAssigned from published graphic
  3. cUsed the given 16.5 mM of consumed lactate as basis for calculation