Skip to main content

Table 8 Parameters calibrated to experimental data

From: A non-linear model of hydrogen production by Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus for diauxic-like consumption of lignocellulosic sugar mixtures

Parameter

Benchmark value derived from [15]

Case 1

Case 2

Case 3

Case 4

Glucose simulation

Xylose simulation

Sugar mixture simulation

Wheat straw hydrolysate simulation

km, maximal uptake rate (h−1)

0.35

1.58 (± 0.042)

0.54 (± 0.012)

0.44 (± 0.023)

km,2, maximal uptake rate when xylose = 0 (h−1)

0.35

2.4 (± 0.15)

0.54 (± 0.018)

1.26 (± 0.11)

Ks,glu, affinity constant, glucose (cmol/L)

0.00029

0.01a

0.01a

0.18 (± 0.043)b

Ks,glu,2, affinity constant 2, glucose (cmol/L)

0.01a

0.01a

Ks,xyl, affinity constant, xylose (cmol/L)

0.0002a

0.0002a

0.0002a

Ks,ara, affinity constant, arabinose (cmol/L)

0.026 (± 0.004)

0.034 (± 0.0077)

Ks,E2, affinity constant enzyme, E2 (cmol/L)

0.001a

0.001a

α, enzyme synthesis rate (h−1)

0.6a

0.64 (± 0.085)

n, Hill coefficient

2a

2a

rcd, cell death rate (h−1)

0.014

0.0027a

0.0027a

0.027a

0.027 (± 0.0039)

\( k_{\text{L}} a_{{{\text{H}}_{2} }} , \) volumetric mass transfer coefficient for hydrogen (h−1)

0.26

0.44a

0.44a

0.44 (± 0.085)

0.44a

\( Y_{{{\text{H}}_{2} }} , yield, hydrogen formation from sugar \)

 

n.c.

n.c.

0.58

n.c.

  1. Confidence interval 95% (CI, 95%) is given for those parameters which have been fitted numerically
  2. n.c. not calibrated, but the values calculated from the experimental data were used (Table 6)
  3. a Graphically calibrated
  4. b This value possibly also includes an inhibition factor I