Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of cofermentation performance of XUSE with those of previously reported xylose-fermenting strains

From: Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a refactored xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for lignocellulosic biofuel production

Strain

Description

Initial glucose–xylose concentration (g/L)

Cofermentation performance

Cofermentation pattern

Refs.

Sugar consumption rate (g/g/h)

Xylose consumption rate (g/g/h)

Ethanol yield (g/g)

XUSE

BY4741, xylA*3, TAL1, XKS1, Δgre3, Δpho13, evolved

20–20

0.23

0.11

0.46

A

This study

SXA-R2P-E

BY4741, xylA*3, tal1, XKS1, Δgre3, Δpho13, evolved

20–20

0.17

0.08

0.43

A

[48]

424A (LNH-ST)

Industrial strain, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1

65–65

0.26

0.13

0.35

A

[49]

MEC1121

Industrial PE-2, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1, TAL1

17–17

0.058

0.029

0.34

A

[50]

S104-TAL

GPY55-15Bα, xyl1, xyl2, TAL1

53–53

0.36

0.1

0.3

A

[51]

RBW218

CEN.PK102-3A, xylA, XKS1, TAL1, RPE1, RKI1, TKL1, ∆gre3, evolved

20–20

0.51

0.25

0.4

B

[52]

DS68625

DSM, xylA, XKS1, TAL1, RPE1, RKI1, TKL1, Hxt36

30–30

0.39

0.18

0.39

B

[53]

Classic-F3

CTY brewing strain, XR, XDH, XKS1

40–40

0.028

0.014

0.38

B

[54]

BP10001

CEN.PK 113-7D, XR, XDH

10–10

0.1

0.034

0.38

B

[55]

MA-R4

IR-2, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1

45–45

0.11

0.055

0.38

B

[56]

TMB3400

Industrial USM21

50–50

0.37

0.19

0.36

B

[57]

F106X

YC-DM, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1, RPE1, RKI1, TKL1, TAL1

50–50

0.11

0.05

0.36

B

[58]

A4

Industrial strain A, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1

50–50

0.13

0.065

0.27

B

[59]

TMB3001

CEN.PK 133-7A, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1

50–50

0.11

0.037

0.23

B

[59]

  1. Cofermentation pattern A: simultaneous cofermentation, B: sequential cofermentation