Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of cofermentation performance of XUSE with those of previously reported xylose-fermenting strains

From: Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a refactored xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for lignocellulosic biofuel production

Strain Description Initial glucose–xylose concentration (g/L) Cofermentation performance Cofermentation pattern Refs.
Sugar consumption rate (g/g/h) Xylose consumption rate (g/g/h) Ethanol yield (g/g)
XUSE BY4741, xylA*3, TAL1, XKS1, Δgre3, Δpho13, evolved 20–20 0.23 0.11 0.46 A This study
SXA-R2P-E BY4741, xylA*3, tal1, XKS1, Δgre3, Δpho13, evolved 20–20 0.17 0.08 0.43 A [48]
424A (LNH-ST) Industrial strain, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1 65–65 0.26 0.13 0.35 A [49]
MEC1121 Industrial PE-2, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1, TAL1 17–17 0.058 0.029 0.34 A [50]
S104-TAL GPY55-15Bα, xyl1, xyl2, TAL1 53–53 0.36 0.1 0.3 A [51]
RBW218 CEN.PK102-3A, xylA, XKS1, TAL1, RPE1, RKI1, TKL1, ∆gre3, evolved 20–20 0.51 0.25 0.4 B [52]
DS68625 DSM, xylA, XKS1, TAL1, RPE1, RKI1, TKL1, Hxt36 30–30 0.39 0.18 0.39 B [53]
Classic-F3 CTY brewing strain, XR, XDH, XKS1 40–40 0.028 0.014 0.38 B [54]
BP10001 CEN.PK 113-7D, XR, XDH 10–10 0.1 0.034 0.38 B [55]
MA-R4 IR-2, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1 45–45 0.11 0.055 0.38 B [56]
TMB3400 Industrial USM21 50–50 0.37 0.19 0.36 B [57]
F106X YC-DM, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1, RPE1, RKI1, TKL1, TAL1 50–50 0.11 0.05 0.36 B [58]
A4 Industrial strain A, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1 50–50 0.13 0.065 0.27 B [59]
TMB3001 CEN.PK 133-7A, xyl1, xyl2, XKS1 50–50 0.11 0.037 0.23 B [59]
  1. Cofermentation pattern A: simultaneous cofermentation, B: sequential cofermentation