Skip to main content

Table 5 Fermentation profile of selected glucose fermenting yeast isolates with acid- and alkali-pretreated rice straw enzymatic hydrolysates at 40 °C in 24 h

From: Evaluation of divergent yeast genera for fermentation-associated stresses and identification of a robust sugarcane distillery waste isolate Saccharomyces cerevisiae NGY10 for lignocellulosic ethanol production in SHF and SSF

S. no.

Yeast strains

Acid pre-treated rice straw enzymatic hydrolysate (APRSEH-1)b

Alkali pre-treated rice straw enzymatic hydrolysate (APRSEH-2)c

Ethanol concentration (g/l)

Ethanol yield (g/g)

Ethanol Productivity (g/l//h)

Ethanol efficiency (%)

Glycerol concentration (g/l)

Acetic acid concentration (g/l)

Ethanol concentration (g/l)

Ethanol yield (g/g)

Ethanol productivity (g/l/h)

Ethanol efficiency (%)

Glycerol concentration (g/l)

Acetic acid concentration (g/l)

1.

Angel yeast

11.79 ± 0.08a

0.451

0.491

88.258

0.47 ± 0.03

0.52 ± 0.02

7.02 ± 0.02

0.456

0.293

89.24

0.46 ± 0.002

0.73 ± 0.02

2.

S. cerevisiae CEN-PK-122

11.65 ± 0.21

0.441

0.485

86.423

1.38 ± 0.07

0.78 ± 0.03

6.95 ± 0.07

0.41

0.289

80.23

1.56 ± 0.06

0.79 ± 0.03

3.

S. cerevisiae NGY1

11.75 ± 0.13

0.445

0.489

87.165

0.6 ± 0.02

0.54 ± 0.02

7.09 ± 0.09

0.454

0.295

88.85

0.39 ± 0.012

0.24 ± 0.01

4.

S. cerevisiae NGY10

12.25 ± 0.09*

0.474

0.51

92.812

0.54 ± 0.02

0.47 ± 0.011

7.18 ± 0.04*

0.468

0.298

91.58

0.33 ± 0.005

0.18 ± 0.002

5.

K. marxianus NCIM 3465

10.89 ± 0.16

0.412

0.453

80.785

0.85 ± 0.04

0.66 ± 0.02

6.19 ± 0.03

0.361

0.257

70.64

0.64 ± 0.021

0.36 ± 0.002

6.

K. marxianus NGY8

11.55 ± 0.08

0.437

0.481

85.681

0.37 ± 0.01

1.87 ± 0.07

6.98 ± 0.07

0.41

0.29

80.23

0.16 ± 0.003

1.57 ± 0.008

7.

C. glabrata CBS138

10.17 ± 0.07

0.419

0.423

82.003

0.28 ± 0.03

0.74 ± 0.032

5.67 ± 0.13

0.331

0.236

64.77

0.07 ± 0.002

0.45 ± 0.01

8.

C. glabrata NGY7

10.92 ± 0.13

0.436

0.455

85.513

0.34 ± 0.02

0.81 ± 0.03

7.02 ± 0.06

0.43

0.292

84.14

0.13 ± 0.003

0.52 ± 0.002

9.

P. kudriavzevii NGY12

9.45 ± 0.16

0.425

0.393

83.264

0.34 ± 0.01

0.67 ± 0.03

6.95 ± 0.11

0.41

0.289

80.23

0.13 ± 0.001

0.39 ± 0.003

11.

P. kudriavzevii NGY20

10.51 ± 0.17

0.456

0.437

89.346

0.34 ± 0.02

0.67 ± 0.033

5.71 ± 0.12

0.332

0.237

64.97

0.13 ± 0.001

0.38 ± 0.002

12.

C. tropicalis NGY19

10.48 ± 0.11

0.464

0.436

90.988

0.47 ± 0.03

0.46 ± 0.021

4.98 ± 0.08

0.29

0.207

56.75

0.26 ± 0.011

0.04 ± 0.001

  1. aMean ± standard deviation for n = 3; Fermentation pH-5.4; Initial sugar = 26.38 g/l, inoculums 5.0% v/v ≈ 1.0 × 107 cells/ml, fermentation time 24 h
  2. bAPRSEH-1 consisted of sugar 33.76 g/l (glucose: 26.38 g/l and xylose: 7.38 g/l), furfural: 0.618 g/l, HMF: 0.748 g/l and acetic acid: 1.91 g/l
  3. cAPRSEH-2 consisted of sugar 22.78 g/l (glucose: 17.15 g/l and xylose: 5.63 g/l), furfural: 0.142 g/l, HMF:0.148 g/l and acetic acid:0.51 g/l
  4. * Statistical student t-test of isolate NGY10 with reference strains CEN-PK-122 and Angel yeast for glucose fermentation of APRSEH-1 and APRSEH-2 was performed, and show significance, i.e. p < 0.05