Skip to main content

Table 1 Real and coded levels of variables used in CCD experiments and the responses glucose concentrations obtained with 6- and 48-h enzymatic hydrolysis ± SD

From: Silencing of a BAHD acyltransferase in sugarcane increases biomass digestibility

Trials

X1

Ethanol concentration (% v/v)

X2

Residence time (min)

NT

Ev. 1

Ev. 2.2

Ev. 2.4

Ev. 3.1

Ev. 4

Glucose 6 h (g L−1)

 1

− 1.0 (40.2)

− 1.0 (34.9)

13.48 ± 0.16b

13.30 ± 0.66b

14.06 ± 0.82ab

15.11 ± 0.11a

14.75 ± 0.26a

11.95 ± 0.32c

 2

− 1.4 (30.0)

+ 1.0 (205.1)

21.75 ± 1.08a

21.04 ± 0.76ab

20.12 ± 0.05ab

20.27 ± 0.25ab

19.37 ± 0.70ab

18.79 ± 0.86b

 3

+ 1.0 (89.8)

− 1.0 (34.9)

7.91 ± 0.15ab

7.37 ± 0.28b

8.30 ± 0.35ab

8.24 ± 0.32a

8.03 ± 0.50ab

7.43 ± 0.22b

 4

+ 1.0 (89.8)

+ 1.0 (205.1)

10.15 ± 0.37a

9.94 ± 0.28a

10.15 ± 0.31a

10.53 ± 0.44a

10.18 ± 0.43a

9.77 ± 0.18a

 5

− 1.4 (30.0)

0 (120.0)

21.08 ± 0.46ab

21.84 ± 0.87a

21.35 ± 0.62ab

20.05 ± 0.71b

21.05 ± 0.92ab

19.86 ± 0.41b

 6

+ 1.4 (100.0)

0 (120.0)

6.26 ± 0.13c

6.19 ± 0.18c

7.20 ± 0.30a

6.95 ± 0.36ab

6.49 ± 0.10bc

6.95 ± 0.06ab

 7

0 (65.0)

− 1.4 (0.0)

7.44 ± 0.30bc

7.42 ± 0.15bc

8.28 ± 0.49a

8.00 ± 0.33ab

7.61 ± 0.19abc

7.12 ± 0.29c

 8

0 (65.0)

+ 1.4 (240.0)

16.89 ± 0.57ab

16.96 ± 1.04ab

15.44 ± 0.56b

17.93 ± 1.06a

17.94 ± 0.58a

16.47 ± 0.34ab

 9

0 (65.0)

0 (120.0)

16.22 ± 0.67a

15.56 ± 0.35a

15.11 ± 0.73a

16.18 ± 0.90a

15.36 ± 0.87a

16.12 ± 0.79a

 10

0 (65.0)

0 (120.0)

13.02 ± 0.37bc

13.15 ± 0.23bc

13.58 ± 0.23ab

14.62 ± 0.65a

12.28 ± 0.09 cd

12.05 ± 0.58d

 11

0 (65.0)

0 (120.0)

10.95 ± 0.51b

12.65 ± 0.12a

10.56 ± 0.47b

13.56 ± 0.68a

12.62 ± 0.29a

10.76 ± 0.58b

Glucose 48 h (g L−1)

 1

− 1.0 (40.2)

− 1.0 (34.9)

23.07 ± 0.46b

20.42 ± 0.77bc

22.07 ± 0.38bc

26.85 ± 1.56a

26.62 ± 2.80a

19.68 ± 1.24c

 2

− 1.4 (30.0)

+ 1.0 (205.1)

31.33 ± 0.86c

35.68 ± 2.58a

32.31 ± 0.55b

34.74 ± 0.75a

31.75 ± 0.04c

28.46 ± 1.45d

 3

+ 1.0 (89.8)

− 1.0 (34.9)

8.92 ± 0.66b

9.09 ± 0.66b

10.65 ± 0.40a

9.53 ± 1.01ab

10.03 ± 0.75ab

9.29 ± 0.28ab

 4

+ 1.0 (89.8)

+ 1.0 (205.1)

13.69 ± 1.38a

13.07 ± 0.39a

14.72 ± 1.19a

13.95 ± 0.56a

14.66 ± 1.00a

13.37 ± 0.88a

 5

− 1.4 (30.0)

0 (120.0)

31.77 ± 0.65bc

38.00 ± 0.96a

33.93 ± 1.53b

33.49 ± 1.59b

29.62 ± 0.76c

31.74 ± 0.88bc

 6

+ 1.4 (100.0)

0 (120.0)

8.49 ± 0.28a

8.51 ± 0.17a

8.93 ± 0.24a

9.31 ± 0.44a

8.63 ± 0.49a

8.44 ± 1.13a

 7

0 (65.0)

− 1.4 (0.0)

8.74 ± 0.29c

8.74 ± 0.06c

10.28 ± 0.85a

9.94 ± 0.31ab

9.17 ± 0.10bc

8.76 ± 0.71c

 8

0 (65.0)

+ 1.4 (240.0)

26.27 ± 0.23ab

29.33 ± 3.55a

22.39 ± 0.44b

29.01 ± 2.81a

28.71 ± 3.22a

24.97 ± 1.00ab

 9

0 (65.0)

0 (120.0)

25.75 ± 2.74a

22.29 ± 2.23a

22.01 ± 2.71a

22.67 ± 1.63a

22.45 ± 3.09a

22.65 ± 4.00a

 10

0 (65.0)

0 (120.0)

25.17 ± 0.28a

23.02 ± 1.78ab

24.23 ± 0.76a

24.89 ± 2.11a

22.66 ± 1.30ab

20.14 ± 0.44b

 11

0 (65.0)

0 (120.0)

16.89 ± 1.53c

25.51 ± 0.63a

16.02 ± 0.87c

22.97 ± 0.88b

23.26 ± 1.39ab

15.57 ± 1.13c

  1. Means followed by the same lower case letters in a line do not differ significantly by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). In this case, letters should be compared only between the rows, but not between different trials. For each experimental condition, presented in a table row, a Tukey test was performed. These results are from four independent replicates. Ev. refers to different transgenic events. NT: nontransformed plants