Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of fermentation assays optimal conditions with similar studies

From: Bioprospecting of wild type ethanologenic yeast for ethanol fuel production from wastewater-grown microalgae

Microorganism Initial sugar concentration (g L−1) Sugar consumption (g L−1) Net sugar consumption (%) Ethanol (g L−1) Ethanol yield (%) Ethanol productivity (g L−1 h−1) Acetic acid (g L−1) Reference
Candida sp. 5.0 ± 0.3 3.6 ± 0.2 75.2 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.1 85.8 ± 0.01 0.150 ± 0.01 1.38 ± 0.05 This study
Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C 5.0 ± 0.3 4.2 ± 0.4 87.2 ± 0.4 2.1 ± 0.1 81.7 ± 0.02 0.129 ± 0.06 1.45 ± 0.10
Clostridium acetobutylicum (MTCC India) 31.45 ND ND 1.0 6.2 0.0083 ND Kallarakkal et al. [48]
S. cerevisiae KL17 13.5 8.5 63 3.5 50.7 0.318 ND Seon et al. [37]
S. cerevisiae (Cameo S.p.A™) 13.0 12.1 ± 0.6 92.6 ± 4.4 4.9 ± 0.1 75.0 0.383 ± 0.10 0.69 ± 0.06 de Farias Silva et al. [11]
Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1–4 16.6 ND ND 0.5 ± 0.1 6.2 ± 0.02 0.030 ± 0.06 ND Castro et al. [38]
  1. ND not determined