Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the performance of dual chamber MFC reported in the literature with the present study

From: Coproduction and enhancement of electricity and biobutanol using adsorption carrier solid-state fermentation

Inoculum source Substrate Volume (L) Time (d) Anode Power density (mW/m2) References
Microalga Effluent water from chocolate factory 1 18 Graphite 105.84 [33]
Shewanella haliotis and Aeromonas hydrophilia Luria–Bertani culture 0.2 0.5 Graphite 68.51 [34]
S. oneidensis MR-1 and Rhodococcus sp o-xylene 0.06 8 Carbon brush 92.5 [35]
Bacterial community within ceramic-based MFC fed with human urine Human urine 0.06 20 Carbon veil 36.66 [36]
Anaerobic sludge Synthetic wastewater 0.03 1.6 Graphite felt 264.5 [37]
C. Acetobutylicum Synthetic medium 0.02 2 Graphite 0.33 [9]
C. Acetobutylicum Artificial wastewater 0.5 9 Carbon paper 3.36 [10]
C. acetobutylicum Synthetic medium 0.2 2 Carbon felt 231 This study