Skip to main content

Table 2 Matrix of Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparisons of % biomass reduction for all treatments

From: Fungi isolated from Miscanthus and sugarcane: biomass conversion, fungal enzymes, and hydrolysis of plant cell wall polymers

Fungal isolates

Trichoderma reesei QM9414

Neurospora crassa

Phanerochaete chrysosporium

Postia placenta

Chloridium sp1

6.00

0.99

0.85

7.42

Alternaria aff tennuissima

3.66

4.29

2.73

5.03

Bipolaris sp1

3.52

1.49

3.34

4.94

Epicoccum aff nigrum

3.30

1.71

3.55

4.72

Minimidochium sp1

2.56

2.45

4.30

3.98

Arthrinium aff phaeospermum

2.02

2.98

4.83

3.45

Cephalosporium aff gramineum

1.10

3.91

5.75

2.52

Fusarium aff proliferatum

0.78

4.23

6.07

2.20

Dothideomycete sp

0.71

4.30

6.15

2.13

Hypocrea aff koningii

0.60

4.40

6.25

2.02

Cladosporidium aff cladosporioides

0.18

4.83

6.68

1.60

Nigrospora aff oryzae

0.07

4.94

6.78

1.49

Microdochium aff bolleyi

0.46

5.47

7.32

0.96

Fusarium aff aethiopicum

1.67

6.68

8.53

0.25

Hypocrea aff lixii

1.59

6.07

7.72

0.32

Aspergillus aff fumigatus

1.88

6.89

8.74

0.46

Gibberella aff moniliformis

2.02

7.03

8.88

0.60

Fusarium aff equiseti

2.27

7.28

9.13

0.85

Gibberella aff avanacea

2.42

7.42

9.27

0.99

Phoma aff herbarum

2.45

7.46

9.31

1.03

Phoma aff glomerata

2.45

7.50

9.31

1.03

Trichoderma aff atroviride

2.49

7.71

9.34

1.07

Arthrinium aff sacchari

2.70

8.31

9.56

1.28

Penicillium aff minimoluteum

3.30

9.20

10.16

1.88

Trichoderma aff spirale

4.19

10.44

11.05

2.77

Aureobasidium aff pullulans

5.43

13.96

12.29

4.01

Exophiala aff salmonis

8.95

16.87

15.81

7.53

Cordyceps aff bassiana

11.86

17.48

18.72

10.44

Sporothrix aff lignivora

12.47

17.80

19.32

11.05

Exophiala aff spinifera

12.79

 

19.64

11.37

Phanerochaete chrysosporium

   

8.28

Neurospora crassa

  

1.85

6.43

Trichoderma reesei QM9414

 

5.01

6.86

1.42

  1. Pairwise comparisons for all treatments compared to four positive controls for ANOVA with percent weight loss at week 8 as response variable.
  2. Legend: values in italics show no significant pairwise differences; values in bold, column is significantly lower than row; values in bold italics, column is significantly higher than row.
Back to article page

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

ISSN: 2731-3654

Contact us