Skip to main content
Download PDF

Integrative omics analyses of the ligninolytic Rhodosporidium fluviale LM-2 disclose catabolic pathways for biobased chemical production

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts volume 16, Article number: 5 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Lignin is an attractive alternative for producing biobased chemicals. It is the second major component of the plant cell wall and is an abundant natural source of aromatic compounds. Lignin degradation using microbial oxidative enzymes that depolymerize lignin and catabolize aromatic compounds into central metabolic intermediates is a promising strategy for lignin valorization. However, the intrinsic heterogeneity and recalcitrance of lignin severely hinder its biocatalytic conversion. In this context, examining microbial degradation systems can provide a fundamental understanding of the pathways and enzymes that are useful for lignin conversion into biotechnologically relevant compounds.

Results

Lignin-degrading catabolism of a novel Rhodosporidium fluviale strain LM-2 was characterized using multi-omic strategies. This strain was previously isolated from a ligninolytic microbial consortium and presents a set of enzymes related to lignin depolymerization and aromatic compound catabolism. Furthermore, two catabolic routes for producing 4-vinyl guaiacol and vanillin were identified in R. fluviale LM-2.

Conclusions

The multi-omic analysis of R. fluviale LM-2, the first for this species, elucidated a repertoire of genes, transcripts, and secreted proteins involved in lignin degradation. This study expands the understanding of ligninolytic metabolism in a non-conventional yeast, which has the potential for future genetic manipulation. Moreover, this work unveiled critical pathways and enzymes that can be exported to other systems, including model organisms, for lignin valorization.

Background

Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant and low-cost source of fermentable sugars and building blocks for the production of biofuels and value-added chemicals, which makes it an attractive alternative to fossil fuels [1]. It is primarily composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. While cellulose and/or hemicellulose can be utilized to produce biofuels and chemicals, the use of lignin has been limited to energy supply.

Lignin is the second major component of plant cell walls, imparting structural stability to plant tissues and fibers, and forming a barrier against microbial infections [2]. It consists of phenylpropanoid monomeric guaiacyl (G), p-hydroxyphenyl (H), and syringyl (S) units randomly interconnected mainly by β-O-4 aryl ether bonds [3]. Considering that 70 million tons of lignin is extracted annually during pulping operations [4], lignin is an abundant natural source of aromatic compounds. However, lignin valorization requires efficient methods for the degradation and conversion of complex mixtures of lignin-derived aromatic compounds into bioproducts. Some microorganisms have been described as being capable of bioconverting lignin into value-added compounds, such as vanillin [5], polyester precursors [6, 7], and even nylon [8], indicating their usefulness for lignin valorization.

In nature, lignin bioprocessing occurs through symbiotic activity, involving white-rot fungi and certain bacterial species, and consists of two steps [9, 10]: (i) lignin depolymerization and (ii) aromatic ring fission. In the first step, lignin macropolymer degraders, such as Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Schizophyllum commune, and Pseudomonas putida, secrete an enzymatic cocktail consisting of oxidative enzymes (e.g., laccases and peroxidases) and accessory enzymes to cleave the linkages between S, G, and H units. Laccases and class II heme-dependent lignin-modifying peroxidases (e.g., lignin peroxidase (LiP) and manganese peroxidase (MnP)) act directly on lignin and lignin fragments [1, 11]. Auxiliary enzymes such as glyoxal oxidases (GLOX) support lignin degradation by producing H2O2 [12], the main substrate for peroxidase reactions (13). In addition to secreting extracellular enzymes, certain microorganisms produce β-etherase and cytochrome P450 (CYP), which cleave β-O-4 bonds and demethylate intracellular lignin fragments, respectively [14, 15].

In the second step, bacteria, fungi, and yeasts assimilate aromatic compounds through funneling pathways, converting the molecules into key central metabolic intermediates or target compounds [10, 16]. Despite the diverse array of oxidized fragments originating from lignin degradation, catabolism proceeds mainly via two major compounds, protocatechuate and catechol (both of which are cleaved to form central intermediates) [9, 16]. For instance, during the degradation of G-unit rich lignin, ferulic acid is converted into vanillin by feruloyl-CoA synthetase (FCS) and feruloyl-CoA hydratase-lyase (FCHL). Vanillin is then cleaved into protocatechuate (vanillin pathway), and the latter is converted into central intermediates (pyruvate, acetyl-CoA, and succinate) through three different pathways, namely the protocatechuate 4,5-cleavage, protocatechuate 2,3-cleavage, and β-ketoadipate pathways [10].

An alternative catabolic route has been described for ferulic acid bioconversion in Rhodotorula rubra [17], Candida guilliermondii [18], and Cupriavidus sp. B-8 [19]. In these microorganisms, ferulic acid is converted into 4-vinylguaiacol (4-VG) using the cofactor-free enzyme phenolic acid decarboxylase (PDC) [20]. Furthermore, 4-VG can be converted to vanillin and subsequently to protocatechuate [21]. Both ferulic acid catabolism pathways have potential biotechnological applications since vanillin and 4-VG are considered value-added bioproducts, and are widely used in the food and cosmetics industries [5, 22].

Although lignin degradation is mainly attributed to white-rot fungi and bacteria, oleaginous yeasts have been reported to be capable of degrading lignin and further assimilating the lignin-derived aromatic compounds. Rhodosporidium sp. can modify wheat straw and Sarkanda grass [23] and consume p-coumaric, p-hydroxybenzoic, and ferulic acids [24, 25]. Additionally, species of this genus have high tolerance toward inhibitors generated during the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass [26]. Even though some model microorganisms such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli, have been engineered for lignin valorization [27, 28], non-model microbes have also been continually characterized to unveil novel ligninolytic pathways with biotechnological relevance. For instance, Rhodosporidium toruloides is genetically and physiologically well characterized, providing vital knowledge for further strain engineering [29].

In this context, a combination of omics approaches was used to determine the genetic potential and physiology of a novel Rhodosporidium fluviale strain LM-2 isolated from a lignin-degrading microbial consortium [30] (Fig. 1). Genomic analysis revealed several genes involved in lignin degradation and aromatic catabolism, and transcriptomic and secretomic analyses elucidated the metabolism of yeast grown in lignin-containing medium. To exploit the biotechnological potential of R. fluviale for the production of compounds of interest, this novel strain was cultivated in media containing ferulic acid. Afterwards, the resulting metabolites were identified by UHPLC–MS/MS to determine possible pathways for ferulic acid catabolism in this yeast. Combining these results and omics approaches, biocatalytic pathways that may be useful for lignin valorization strategies were identified in this novel yeast.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the methods used in the study. A R. fluviale LM-2 isolated from the lignin-degrading consortium LigMet [30]. B) Omic approaches were used to characterize the genome, gene expressions, and secreted proteins related to lignin degradation. C) R. fluviale LM-2 cells were cultivated in a ferulic acid-containing medium to identify the active catabolic pathways for this compound

Full size image

Results

Isolation and identification

In a previous study, Moraes and collaborators (2018) isolated and identified several bacteria and yeasts in the LigMet microbial community, a lignin-degrading consortium developed by growing cultures on low-molecular-weight (LW) lignin [30]. For isolation of microorganisms, the culture broth from LigMet was diluted and plated on agar supplemented with LW lignin and high-molecular-weight (HW) lignin with glucose (HW + G) [30]. For the analysis described herein, the yeast strain LM-2 was selected, which was capable of growing on LW and HW + G plates (data not shown) and was highly tolerant to different kraft lignin concentrations (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

To identify the LM-2, the ITS1 and ITS2 regions were sequenced, and a BLAST search was performed against the GenBank nucleotide (nonredundant) database. The analysis revealed that LM-2 shared 100% and 98% sequence identity with R. fluviale and Rhodosporidium azoricum, respectively (Table 1), and clustered together with R. fluviale DMKU RK253 [31] based on phylogenetic tree construction using ITS regions (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). This indicated that LM-2 was a novel R. fluviale strain and was therefore named R. fluviale LM-2.

Table 1 Closest organism matches on GenBank nr (nonredundant) database
Full size table

Physiological tests based on cell viability at different temperatures have been used to distinguish between R. azoricum and R. fluviale [32, 33]. R. fluviale can grow at both 30 and 37 ℃, whereas R. azoricum grows at 30 ℃ [32]. LM-2 showed the same temperature tolerance at 30 and 37 ℃ (Additional file 3: Fig. S3), corroborating the result of species determination by phylogenetic analyses.

Genomic analysis and functional annotation

Illumina sequencing generated 9,839,814 paired-end, and 5,873,616 mated-pair reads (Additional file 7: Table S1). The assembled R. fluviale LM-2 genome was 50.7 Mb in length, distributed in 337 contigs with 60.15% G + C content, and a contig N50 length of 324 Kbp (Table 2). The assembly assessed by Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologous (BUSCO) revealed 235 (92.2%) completeness, and 130 (51%) complete and duplicated, 9 (3.5%) fragmented, and 11 (4.3%) missing BUSCO genes. Gene prediction identified 17,565 open reading frames (ORFs), with an average of 1589 bp per gene, most of which contained at least one intron.

Table 2 General features of the R. fluviale LM-2 genome
Full size table

Based on functional analysis, 16,906 genes (96.2%) were annotated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms (Additional file 4: Fig. S4), 1990 (11.3%) enzyme codes, 430 (2.5%) CAZyme domains, 10,487 (59.7%) PFAM domains, 1855 (10.5%) hypothetical proteins, and 1257 (7.1%) presented signal peptides (Additional file 8: Table S2). Nonetheless, to explore the role of R. fluviale LM-2 in lignin degradation at the genetic level, this work focused on aromatic degradation and lignin metabolism.

Enzymes correlated with lignocellulose degradation and lignin metabolic pathways identified in the R. fluviale LM-2 genome

Several enzymes involved in the first step of lignin degradation were identified in the R. fluviale LM-2 genome. Based on enzymatic functions [34], 61 genes were classified as peroxidases (EC 1.11.1) (Fig. 2), including four heme peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.14), nine catalases (EC 1.11.1.6), two glutathione peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.12), two Dyp-type peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.19), and CYP enzymes (EC 1.11.1.7). While class II heme peroxidases, Dyp-type peroxidases, and CYP are capable of degrading polymeric lignin [35, 36], catalases and glutathione peroxidases are responsible for controlling the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during lignin oxidation, by regulating the intracellular levels of H2O2, and thus protecting the cells under stress conditions [37].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Enzyme classes and CAZy domains predicted in the R. fluviale LM-2 genome. Enzyme identification using Enzyme Commission number (EC number) and HMM-based dbCAN2 platform for CAZy domains (PL: polysaccharide lyases; GT: glycosyl transferases; GH: glycoside hydrolases; CE: carbohydrate esterases; CBM: carbohydrate-binding modules; AA: auxiliary activities)

Full size image

R. fluviale LM-2 genome contains several CAZymes, including 183 predicted glycoside hydrolases (GHs), 155 glycosyltransferases (GTs), eight polysaccharide lyases (PLs), and 24 carbohydrate esterases (CEs) (Fig. 2). Among the CAZymes involved in lignin degradation, 57 belonged to 10 distinct auxiliary activity (AA) families. For instance, four genes previously identified as those of heme peroxidases (EC 1.11.1.14) belong to the AA2 family, 12 genes coding for aryl alcohol oxidases (AAO) belong to the AA3 family, and 10 genes coding for GLOX belong to the AA5_1 subfamily. Moreover, four AAO and nine GLOX genes were predicted to code for signal peptides, indicating that the encoded proteins may be extracellularly localized and participate in lignin degradation.

In addition to oxidative enzymes, the intracellular pathways for lignin and aromatic catabolism were also investigated, reconstructing metabolic pathways based on Pfam domain prediction. Among the 17,565 proteins predicted, 31 β-etherase encoding sequences (Pfam numbers: PF02798, PF00043, and PF13417) participated in intracellular lignin degradation, and 246 encoded proteins were related to aromatic catabolism (Fig. 3). Among the predicted aromatic catabolic enzymes, two FCSs (PF13607 and PF13380), 14 FCHLs (PF00378), and two PDCs (PF05870) were identified, suggesting that R. fluviale LM-2 is potentially capable of catabolizing ferulic acid by two distinct pathways, named here as ferulic acid pathways I (via vanillin) and II (via 4-vinyl guaiacol) (Additional file 5: Fig. S5). Moreover, the identification of enzymes involved in protocatechuate 4,5 and protocatechuate 2,3-cleavage pathways and the β-ketoadipate pathway indicated that protocatechuate produced from the vanillin pathway can be converted to central intermediates through these three different pathways (protocatechuate 4,5-cleavage, protocatechuate 2,3-cleavage and β-ketoadipate pathways).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Predicted proteins encoding Pfam domains for aromatic compound degradation. The genes were identified in the R. fluviale LM-2 genome

Full size image

Gene expression and production of ligninolytic enzymes

Transcriptome and secretome analyses were combined to investigate the ability of R. fluviale LM-2 to degrade lignin and metabolize lignin-derived aromatic compounds. Transcriptomic data contained an average of 25 million and 17 million reads for replicates with kraft lignin-containing medium and glucose control, respectively. RNA-seq analysis identified 15,986 distinct transcripts, of which 3618 were differentially expressed during cultivation on lignin-containing medium (p ≤ 0.05), including 1657 upregulated (Log2 fold change ≥ 1) and 1961 downregulated (Log2 fold change ≤ 1) transcripts (Additional file 6: Fig. S6). The Log2 fold change ranged from 8.5 to − 9.1, and the top ten upregulated and downregulated genes by fold change are listed in Additional file 9: Table S3. The top ten upregulated genes consisted mainly of hypothetical proteins and dehydrin, which is a stress response protein (DHN family protein). On the other hand, the top ten downregulated genes included sugar transporters and proteins identified from the expansin family which include cell wall modification proteins [38].

Table 3 summarizes the upregulated genes encoding enzymes related to lignin depolymerization, including heme peroxidases (AA2), β-etherase, and CYP. No upregulated genes related to ferulic acid pathway II or protocatechuate 2,3-cleavage pathway were identified under the conditions analyzed. Therefore, under the analyzed conditions, the transcriptomic analyses indicated that R. fluviale LM-2 catabolizes ferulic acid preferentially through ferulic acid pathway I, followed by the vanillin, protocatechuate 4,5-cleavage, and β-ketoadipate pathways (Fig. 4). A finding that has indirect implications for lignin degradation, is that the stress response enzyme catalase (Table 3) and 45 genes of 229 major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters predicted in the R. fluviale LM-2 genome (Additional file 8: Table S2) were also upregulated during cultivation on lignin-containing medium.

Table 3 Expression profiles of ligninolytic genes in the R. fluviale LM-2 transcriptome
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Differential expression of enzymes related to aromatic degradation identified in the R. fluviale LM-2 transcriptome. Red arrows show the number of upregulated genes identified by RNA sequencing. Upregulated genes: values of Log2 fold change > 1 and p value ≥ 0.05. No upregulated genes related to ferulic acid pathway II or the protocatechuate 2,3-cleavage pathway were identified under the conditions analyzed. Enzymes identified as upregulated: feruloyl-CoA hydratase/lyase, PF00378 (Ferulic acid pathway I); Vanillin dehydrogenase, PF00171 (Vanillin pathway); NAD-depend dehydrogenase, PF00106 (protocatechuate 4,5-cleavage pathway); 3-oxoadipate enol-lactonase, PF00561 and beta-ketoadipyl-CoA thiolase, PF00108/PF02803 (β-ketoadipate pathway)

Full size image

To identify secreted proteins related to lignin degradation, R. fluviale LM-2 cells were cultivated in lignin-containing medium. After 24 h, supernatant was collected for mass spectrometry and data processing. Sixty-one protein matches were identified (Table 4), with 271 unique peptides. Among these protein matches, 21 (34%) were identified as hypothetical proteins, 10 (16%) as CAZymes (coding for GT71 family, GH23 family, GH128 family, AA5_1 subfamily, and carbohydrate-binding molecules-CBM), 3 (5%) as ligninolytic enzymes (GLOX—AA5_1 and CYP) (Fig. 5), and 45 (74%) as signal peptides (Table 4). With regard to ligninolytic enzymes, two protein matches for the auxiliary activity enzyme GLOX – AA5_1 (with a signal peptide) and one protein match for CYP (without a signal peptide) were identified. Although R. fluviale LM-2 contains genes related to lignin-modifying peroxidases (AA2), none of these enzymes were detected in the secretome.

Table 4 R. fluviale LM-2 secreted proteins
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Functional categorization of proteins secreted by R. fluviale LM-2 identified through UHPLC–MS/MS. Cells were grown in minimal medium (YNB) supplemented with 1% kraft lignin for the assay. Two sequences for a GLOX (CAZyme-AA5_1) and one for CYP (aromatic demethylation) were also classified as ligninolytic enzymes

Full size image

Collectively, gene expression and production of ligninolytic enzymes analysis confirmed that R. fluviale LM-2 can carry out the first and second steps of the lignin degradation, producing H2O2, which is the substrate of peroxidases and several enzymes involved in the conversion of phenolic compounds into central metabolic intermediates.

Bioconversion of ferulic acid into 4-VG

Ferulic acid is the major hydroxycinnamic acid recovered from plant biomass and has a broad spectrum of antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities [39]. In addition, this phenolic compound is an important precursor for the production of high value-added chemicals such as vanillin and 4-VG [40], which are aromatic compounds used to impart vanilla flavor and clove aroma to food products, respectively.

To evaluate the ability of R. fluviale LM-2 to convert ferulic acid into 4-VG and vanillin, R. fluviale LM-2 cells were cultivated in minimal medium with and without ferulic acid. Capillary electrophoresis of the extracellular fluid indicated that ferulic acid was not degraded spontaneously during cultivation (negative control: minimal medium with ferulic acid), and R. fluviale LM-2 completely consumed this compound within 24 h (Fig. 6B). Secondly, ferulic acid and its possible conversion products (4-VG and vanillin) were detected intracellularly by mass spectrometry after 12 h of cultivation (Fig. 6C and Additional file 10: Table S4). For the latest analysis, the results of R. fluviale LM-2 cultivated with ferulic acid were compared with the results of R. fluviale LM-2 cultivated without ferulic acid.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Evaluation of ferulic acid assimilation and catabolism by R. fluviale LM-2. A Cell culture in minimal medium (YNB) containing 0.1% glucose with/without 1.25 mM ferulic acid. Control: minimal medium (YNB) + 0.1% glucose + 1.25 mM ferulic acid without cells; B detection of ferulic acid by capillary electrophoresis (UV-214 nm) at different time points (6 h, 12 h and 24 h). Comparison between the culture containing ferulic acid and R. fluviale LM-2 cells and the control (without cells). C Intracellular metabolite identification after 12 h of cultivation. Comparison between the culture of R. fluviale LM-2 cells with/without ferulic acid in the medium. (Ferulic acid: MW 194 g/mol; C10H10O4; retention time 5.6 min), (4-vinyl-guaiacol: MW 150 g/mol; C9H10O2; retention time 4.7 min and 6.5) and (vanillin: MW 152 g/mol; C8H8O3; retention time 4.7 min)

Full size image

Therefore, mass spectrometry analysis validated the presence of the two metabolic pathways for ferulic acid conversion predicted from the genomic analysis (Additional file 5: Fig. S5): one based on the sequential action of FCS and FCHL to produce vanillin (ferulic acid pathway I), and the other based on the decarboxylation of ferulic acid to produce 4-VG (ferulic acid pathway II), catalyzed by PDC.

Discussion

To our knowledge, the genomic analysis of R. fluviale LM-2 in this study is the first one for this species, and as with other species from this genus, R. fluviale is capable of accumulating lipids (up to 50–70% of their dry weight) [41] and of tolerating inhibitory compounds [42]. For example, R. fluviale DMKU-RK253, which was isolated after enrichment of sugarcane leaf samples [41], accumulated high lipid levels after cultivation in glycerol containing medium [31]. Comparative genomic analysis revealed that R. fluviale LM-2 harbors a relatively large genome (50 Mb), with a larger set of predicted protein-coding genes (17,565) than R. toruloides (20.2 Mb, containing 8171 protein-coding genes) [43]. Genome size variation is a typical adaptive response in fungi to adapt to a specific habitat or ecological niche and involves genome duplication and translocation [44]. For instance, the genome of Phanerochaete carnosa shows a tandem duplication of ligninolytic genes compared to P. chrysosporium [45]. Furthermore, duplication of these genes could confer competitive advantage to ligninolytic organisms in nature, compared to other organisms that have less tolerance to the toxicity of aromatic compounds [46]. The large size of R. fluviale LM-2 genome was also observed based on de novo transcriptome assembly using Trinity, which was about 44 Mb with a completeness of 80%.

Multi-omic analysis of R. fluviale LM-2 elucidated a repertoire of genes, transcripts, and secreted proteins involved in lignin degradation, as well as the ability to convert lignin-derived aromatics into vanillin and 4-VG. R. fluviale LM-2 expresses heme peroxidases (AA2), β-etherases, and CYPs for lignin depolymerization, as well as several enzymes with a Pfam domain related to aromatic degradation. In contrast to the Rhodotorula sp. R2 [23], which secretes enzymes that act directly on lignin macromolecules, the AA2 enzyme from R. fluviale LM-2 was not secreted under the conditions analyzed. However, R. fluviale LM-2 appears to perform the first step of lignin degradation by secreting GLOX—AA5_1. Although aromatic compound metabolism by yeast is an uncommon phenotype, for example, S. cerevisiae INVSc1 Invitrogen™ uptakes low levels of mono-aryl compounds for further metabolism [47], oleaginous yeasts such as R. fluviale LM-2 have been extensively studied in this context since the products of aromatic metabolism (acetyl-CoA and pyruvate) are fatty acid biosynthesis precursors. For instance, Yaguchi and collaborators (2020) screened 36 yeast strains cultivated with several aromatic compounds, in which each species presented a unique metabolism and tolerance profile to these compounds [48]. Additionally, it is important to mention that the work described here focused on the secreted enzymes for lignin depolymerization. However, the whole proteomic analysis would also be helpful to improve the coverage of lignin-inducible genes in this yeast.

Collectively, the data indicated that during lignin catabolism, genes involved in stress response were upregulated in R. fluviale LM-2, probably in response to the toxicity of aromatic compounds. For example, enzymes responsible for controlling intracellular ROS production, such as catalases, were overexpressed in the presence of lignin. In addition, DNH was also overexpressed under the conditions analyzed. DHN has been characterized as a stress enzyme in plants, and is involved in membrane protection, cryoprotection of enzymes, and protection from reactive oxygen species [49, 50]. Beyond its demethylation role, CYP is also an essential component of the stress response system [51] and could therefore play a role in the adaptation of R. fluviale LM-2 to support ligninolytic pathways.

Among the transporters, MSF was upregulated in response to growth in lignin-containing medium, indicating its importance in lignin catabolism in R. fluviale LM-2. Members of this superfamily transport various small compounds, including aromatic compounds, across biological membranes [52]. Moreover, the overexpression of this transporter has been described as crucial for increasing protocatechuate conversion in Sphingobium sp. strain SYK-6 [53].

The biocatalytic conversion of ferulic acid can be useful for the production of desired chemicals [46, 54, 55]. Ferulic acid is usually converted to vanillin by FCS and FCHL with ATP consumption in two steps [56, 57]: (i) CoA-thioesterification of ferulic acid by FCS, and (ii) hydration of feruloyl-CoA by FCHL. The alternative catabolic route of ferulic acid through the 4-VG pathway is a detoxification process involving non-oxidative decarboxylation driven by the cofactor-free enzyme PDC [20]. Sequences coding a FCS, a FCHL, and a PDC were identified in the R. fluviale LM-2 genome based on Pfam domain analyses. This finding and the detection of vanillin and 4-VG after cultivation with ferulic acid indicated that these two ferulic acid catabolic pathways are functional in R. fluviale LM-2. Furthermore, similar to R. toruloides IFO0880 [24], R. fluviale LM-2 consumed all the ferulic acid added to the culture media before 24 h of growth.

Conclusion

The present study shows that R. fluviale LM-2 possesses a wide spectrum of enzymes involved in lignin and phenylpropanoid degradation, which can be useful for lignin valorization strategies. Therefore, these results suggest that R. fluviale LM-2 could not only be classified as a ligninolytic yeast, but also as a degrader of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic aromatic pollutants. In summary, the omics-based characterization of R. fluviale LM-2 opens new opportunities for biotechnological applications of this yeast. The availability of genomic data can support the genetic manipulation of this yeast and the development of lignin valorization strategies. In addition, this work uncovered functional ligninolytic pathways and novel genes, including FCS, FCHL, and PDC enzymes, that can be exported to other systems, such as model organisms, in biotechnology for the production of biofuels and bioproducts.

Methods

Isolation and identification

The yeast strain was identified in a lignin-degrading microbial consortium established on acidified black liquor generated from delignification of steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse (LW lignin) [30]. The yeast strain was isolated on separated agar plates containing: 1:1 (v/v) LW lignin; 0.25% (w/v) HW lignin and 0.1% (w/v) glucose (HW + G) [30]. The strain’s tolerance to different concentrations of kraft lignin was analyzed using a spot plating assay, in which several dilutions (10−1–10−7) of the cells were plated on agar supplemented with kraft lignin at four concentrations of 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, and 0.125%.

For species identification, total DNA was extracted using the Fast DNA® Spin Kit for Soil (MP-Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality and concentration of the extracted DNA were evaluated using 1.0% (m/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm using a NanoDrop® 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The sequences of the hypervariable internal transcribed spacer ITS1 and ITS2 regions were amplified by PCR using the following primers: ITS3 forward (GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC) and ITS4 reverse (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC). The resulting sequences were compared with those in the GenBank nonredundant nucleotide sequence database using the BLASTn algorithm [58].

Genome sequencing and assembly

For genome sequencing, paired-end and mated-pair libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT DNA Sample Prep Kit and Nextera® Mate Pair Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), respectively. Libraries were quantified and quality checked using the KAPA library quantification kit (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and Bioanalyzer high-sensitivity DNA chips (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq Platform using 2 × 300 bp, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Illumina reads of different sizes were first filtered to remove adapters and low-quality reads using NextClip [59] and Trimmomatic 0.32 [60] using default settings. The genome was de novo assembled using Velvet 1.2.10 [61] and SSPACE [62] was used for scaffolding using the mated-pair reads. Pilon [63] was used to further improve genome assembly. Gene calling was performed using the Maker pipeline [64] using Augustus [65] and SNAP [66]. Genome completeness was assessed through BUSCO v2 [67].

Functional annotation was performed using Blast2GO [68], InterProScan [69], Swiss-Prot [70] and Pfam [71] to predict motifs, domains, and other signatures. Signal peptides were predicted using SignalP, version 4 [72]. Comprehensive analysis of CAZymes was performed using the HMM-based dbCAN2 platform using HMMER and dbCAN (E-value < 1e− 15 and coverage > 0.35) [73].

Growth conditions and transcriptome analysis

After overnight cultivation in YPD liquid medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose), yeast cells were harvested and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4). The cells were inoculated to a final OD600 of 0.2 and cultivated in triplicate for 16 h in Bushnell Haas Broth (Sigma–Aldrich, San Luis, MO, USA), pH 7.0, supplemented with 0.1% kraft lignin (Sigma–Aldrich, 471,003) and 0.1% glucose, or 0.1% glucose as the sole carbon source. 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) was used to estimate reducing sugars (data not shown).

Although R. fluviale LM-2 has a high tolerance to different concentrations of kraft lignin and can metabolize phenolic compounds, as described in the manuscript, the yeast could not grow well in liquid media with lignin as the only carbon source (data not shown). Thus, to proceed with the transcriptome analysis, it was added to the culture media 0,1% glucose consumed in less the 4 h by the yeast (data not shown).

Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min, and total RNA was preserved using TRIzol® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by extraction and purification using the RNeasy Plant MiniKit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The quantity and quality of the extracted RNA were determined using a NanoDrop® 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and a 2100 Bioanalyzer platform (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with a minimum RIN (RNA integrity number) of 7.0 [74].

Libraries were prepared using a TruSeq® Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Quality and quantity were determined using capillary electrophoresis on a 2100 Bioanalyzer platform (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the KAPA Library Quantification Kit for Illumina (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), respectively. The libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Reads were preprocessed as described previously for the genome libraries, and evaluation and filtration of the rRNA were performed using SortmeRNA. The filtered data were mapped against the R. fluviale LM-2 reference genome sequenced in this study using the Tophat2 algorithm [75]. Differential gene expression analysis was based on counting data and was performed with R using the Bioconductor DESeq2 package [76] through paired comparisons against the control (medium lacking lignin). Transcripts showing differential expression (log2-fold change ≥ 1 and ≤ -1) relative to the control were determined using p ≤ 0.05 as the threshold. A volcano plot was generated using R scripts with the log2-fold change value as the input.

Growth conditions for secretome analysis

After overnight preculture in YPD broth (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose), the cells were harvested by centrifugation (4,000 rpm, 10 min), washed with 30 ml of PBS, and inoculated into a flask containing 100 ml yeast nitrogen base (YNB) with amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich—Y1250) supplemented with 0.1% kraft lignin and 0.1% glucose to an initial OD600 of 0.1. After 24 h, the cultures were centrifuged (4000 rpm, 10 min), and the supernatants were filtered through 0.45 μm and 0.2 μm MF-Millipore® membrane filters (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to remove residual cells. Protein content was concentrated using Vivaspin 20 ultrafiltration spin columns (Sartorius Stedim, Gottingen, Germany) with a molecular mass cutoff of 3 kDa, and quantified using the Bradford assay (BioRad®, Hercules, CA, USA) [77]. The proteins were separated by 10% SDS–PAGE and the protein bands were excised and analyzed by mass spectrometry.

Secretome mass spectrometry analysis and data processing

For secretome analysis, aliquots of 25 µg of the concentrated supernatant were subjected to SDS–PAGE in triplicates, and the protein bands were excised and analyzed using Micro LC–MS/MS QTof XEVO G2 XS equipment (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at the Life Sciences Core Facility (LaCTAD, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil). The columns were equilibrated with 93% mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and 7% mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) at 40 ℃. Peptides were separated from the C18 Trap column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) by gradient elution (7% to 40% acetonitrile) on an ACQUITY UPLC M-Class HSS T3 analytical column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA).

Data-independent acquisition (MSE) was carried out by operating the instrument in positive ion V mode, applying the MS and MS/MS functions over 0.5 s intervals with 6 V low energy and 15–45 V high energy collision, to obtain the peptide mass to charge ratio (m/z) and product ion information, for deducing the amino acid sequence. The capillary voltage and source temperature were set to 3.0 kV and 80 ℃, respectively. To correct the mass drift, the internal mass calibrant leucine enkephalin (556.2771 Da) was infused every 30 s through a lock spray ion source at a flow rate of 3 µL/min. Peptide signal data were collected between 100 and 2000 m/z values.

Proteins present in the samples were identified through comparison with the protein sequences previously predicted in the genome analysis, and by setting the minimum number of fragment ion matches per peptide and protein to three and five, respectively. The false positive discovery rate (FDR) was set at 4%. The FDR for peptide and protein identification was determined based on the search of a reversed database, which was generated automatically using ProteinLynx Global SERVER™ (PLGS) software (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), by reversing the sequence of each entry. All protein hits were identified at a confidence level of  > 95%. Raw data processing and protein identification were performed using the ProteinLynx Global SERVER 3.0.3 (Waters, Milford, MA, USA).

Yeast cultivation and secondary metabolite extraction

After overnight preculture in YPD broth, yeast was cultivated in minimal medium YNB with amino acids supplemented with 0.1% glucose with and without 1.25 mM ferulic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, 128,708) to an initial OD600 of 0.1. The medium without cells was used as a control for compound degradation. Cultures were sampled after 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h for further capillary electrophoresis (for extracellular fluid) and mass spectrometry (for intracellular fluid).

For analysis of extracellular fluid by mass spectrometry, the cultures were centrifuged (8000 rpm, 10 min), and the supernatant was used for secondary metabolite extraction using ethyl acetate (1:1). The organic phase was collected and dried using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (Speed Vac Vacuum Concentrators, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For intracellular secondary metabolite evaluation, intracellular compounds were extracted with 1 mL of MeOH and formic acid solution (0.1% v/v) for 40 min in an ultrasonic bath. The extracts were centrifuged (10,000 rpm for 10 min), and the supernatants were collected and dried using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (SpeedVac Vacuum Concentrators; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Before mass spectrometry, both extracts were resuspended in 1 ml MeOH and filtered using a 0.22-μm pore-size filter with a hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane. All extractions were performed in triplicates.

UHPLC–MS/MS analysis

Liquid chromatography analysis was performed using an UltiMate 3000 UHPLC coupled to a high-resolution Orbitrap Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with an electrospray ionization source (RESI-II) set to 3515 V. Chromatography was performed on an Accucore C18 column (2.6 μm pore size, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For gradient elution, 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% acetonitrile in water (solvent B) were used, and the eluent profile (A:B) was as follows:0 -10 min 5% solvent B, 10–15 min 5% to 98% solvent B, 15–16.2 min 98% to 5% solvent B and 16.2–25 min 5% solvent B. The flow rate was set at 0.2 ml min−1, and the injection volume was 3 μL. The voltage and temperature of the capillary were set to + 3.5 kV and at 250 ℃, respectively. The analyses were performed using collision energies of 20, 30, and 40 eV. The parameters of the MS analysis were set in positive ion mode ionization [M + H]+, with an m/z range of 115 to 1500, and the six most intense ions were selected for automatic fragmentation (Auto MS/MS). All operations and spectral analyses were performed using Xcalibur software, version 3.0.63 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Sequence accession numbers

The draft genome sequence and transcriptome of R. fluviale LM-2 were deposited in the EMBL-EBI (European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute) database under the accession number PRJNA817419 (Genome: SRX14500032-35; Transcriptome: SRX14526891-SRX14526902).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. In addition, the draft genome sequence and transcriptome were deposited in the EMBL-EBI database under the accession number PRJNA817419 (Genome: SRX14500032-35; Transcriptome: SRX14526891-SRX14526902).

Abbreviations

4-VG:

4-Vinylguaiacol

AA:

Auxiliary activity

AAO:

Aryl alcohol oxidases

BUSCO:

Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologous

CE:

Carbohydrate esterase

CYP:

Cytochrome P450

DNS:

3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid

EMBL-EBI:

European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute

FCHL:

Feruloyl-CoA hydratase-lyase

FCS:

Feruloyl-CoA synthetase

FDR:

False positive discovery rate

G:

Guaiacyl

GH:

Glycoside hydrolase

GLOX:

Glyoxal oxidases

GO:

Gene Ontology

GT:

Glycosyltransferases

H:

P-Hydroxyphenyl

HW:

High-molecular-weight lignin

HW + G:

High-molecular-weight lignin with glucose

LiP:

Lignin peroxidase

LW:

Low-molecular-weight lignin

MFS:

Major facilitator superfamily transporters

MnP:

Manganese peroxidase

MSE:

Data-independent acquisition

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PDC:

Phenolic acid decarboxylase

PL:

Polysaccharide lyases

PLGS:

ProteinLynx Global SERVERâ„¢

PTFE:

Polytetrafluoroethylene

RIN:

RNA integrity number

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

S:

Syringyl

UHPLC–MS/MS:

Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry

YNB:

Yeast nitrogen base

References

  1. Chio C, Sain M, Qin W. Lignin utilization: a review of lignin depolymerization from various aspects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;107:232–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubin EM. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature. 2008;454:841–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Z, Wan C. Biological valorization strategies for converting lignin into fuels and chemicals. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;73:610–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lora JH. Industrial commercial lignins: sources, properties and applications. Monomers, Polym Compos from Renew Resour. 2008;10:225–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weng C, Peng X, Han Y. Depolymerization and conversion of lignin to value-added bioproducts by microbial and enzymatic catalysis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Spence EM, Calvo-Bado L, Mines P, Bugg TDH. Metabolic engineering of Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 for production of pyridine-dicarboxylic acids from lignin. Microb Cell Fact. 2021;20:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez JM, Kontur WS, Alherech M, Coplien J, Karlen SD, Stahl SS, et al. Funneling aromatic products of chemically depolymerized lignin into 2-pyrone-4-6-dicarboxylic acid with Novosphingobium aromaticivorans. Green Chem. 2019;21:1340–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohlstedt M, Starck S, Barton N, Stolzenberger J, Selzer M, Mehlmann K, et al. From lignin to nylon: cascaded chemical and biochemical conversion using metabolically engineered Pseudomonas putida. Metab Eng. 2018;47:279–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker J, Wittmann C. A field of dreams: lignin valorization into chemicals, materials, fuels, and health-care products. Biotechnol Adv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brink DP, Ravi K, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Mapping the diversity of microbial lignin catabolism: experiences from the eLignin database. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:3979–4002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cajnko MM, Oblak J, Grilc M, Likozar B. Enzymatic bioconversion process of lignin: mechanisms, reactions and kinetics. Bioresour Technol. 2021;340:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kersten PJ, Kirk TK. Involvement of a new enzyme, glyoxal oxidase, in extracellular H2O2 production by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:2195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pollegioni L, Tonin F, Rosini E. Lignin-degrading enzymes. FEBS J. 2015;282:1190–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marinović M, Nousiainen P, Dilokpimol A, Kontro J, Moore R, Sipilä J, et al. Selective Cleavage of Lignin β- O-4 Aryl Ether Bond by β-Etherase of the White-Rot Fungus Dichomitus squalens. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6:2878–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mallinson SJB, Machovina MM, Silveira RL, Garcia-Borràs M, Gallup N, Johnson CW, et al. A promiscuous cytochrome P450 aromatic O-demethylase for lignin bioconversion. Nat Commun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04878-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Azubuike CC, Allemann MN, Michener JK. Microbial assimilation of lignin-derived aromatic compounds and conversion to value-added products. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2022;65:64–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Donaghy JA, Kelly PF, McKay A. Conversion of ferulic acid to 4-vinyl guaiacol by yeasts isolated from unpasteurised apple juice. J Sci Food Agric. 1999;79:453–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang HK, Tokashiki M, Maeno S, Onaga S, Taira T, Ito S. Purification and properties of phenolic acid decarboxylase from Candida guilliermondii. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:55–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chai LY, Zhang H, Yang WC, Zhu YH, Yang ZH, Zheng Y, et al. Biodegradation of ferulic acid by a newly isolated strain of Cupriavidus sp. B-8. J Cent South Univ. 2013;20:1964–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheng X, Lind MES, Himo F. Theoretical study of the reaction mechanism of phenolic acid decarboxylase. FEBS J. 2015;282:4703–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Priefert H, Rabenhorst J, Steinbüchel A. Biotechnological production of vanillin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;56(3):296–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mishra S, Sachan A, Vidyarthi AS, Sachan SG. Transformation of ferulic acid to 4-vinyl guaiacol as a major metabolite: a microbial approach. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2014;13:377–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hainal AR, Capraru AM, Irina V, Popa VI. Lignin as a carbon source for the cultivation of some rhodotorula species. Cellul Chem Technol. 2012;46:87–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yaegashi J, Kirby J, Ito M, Sun J, Dutta T, Mirsiaghi M, et al. Rhodosporidium toruloides: A new platform organism for conversion of lignocellulose into terpene biofuels and bioproducts. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. SànchezNogué V, Black BA, Kruger JS, Singer CA, Ramirez KJ, Reed ML, et al. Integrated diesel production from lignocellulosic sugars via oleaginous yeast. Green Chem. 2018;20:4349–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Li Z, Zhang X, Hu F, Ryu DDY, Bao J. Screening of oleaginous yeast strains tolerant to lignocellulose degradation compounds. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009;159:591–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu W, Liu F, Singh S. Toward engineering E. coli with an autoregulatory system for lignin valorization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:2970–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang RK, Tan YS, Cui YZ, Xin X, Liu ZH, Li BZ, et al. Lignin valorization for protocatechuic acid production in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Green Chem. 2021;23:6515–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wen Z, Zhang S, Odoh CK, Jin M, Zhao ZK. Rhodosporidium toruloides-A potential red yeast chassis for lipids and beyond One sentence summary: a review updates research progresses on the red yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides and highlights future engineering directions. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020;20:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moraes EC, Alvarez TM, Persinoti GF, Tomazetto G, Brenelli LB, Paixão DAA, et al. Lignolytic-consortium omics analyses reveal novel genomes and pathways involved in lignin modification and valorization. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Polburee P, Yongmanitchai W, Lertwattanasakul N, Ohashi T, Fujiyama K, Limtong S. Characterization of oleaginous yeasts accumulating high levels of lipid when cultivated in glycerol and their potential for lipid production from biodiesel-derived crude glycerol. Fungal Biol. 2015;119:1194–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sampaio JP. RhodosporidiumBanno (1967). Yeasts. 2011;3:1523–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hamamoto M, Nagahama T, Tamura M. Systematic study of basidiomycetous yeasts—Evaluation of the ITS regions of rDNA to delimit species of the genus Rhodosporidium. FEMS Yeast Res. 2002;2:409–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bairoch A. The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:304–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yoshida T, Sugano Y. A structural and functional perspective of DyP-type peroxidase family. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015;574:49–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Park HA, Park G, Jeon W, Ahn JO, Yang YH, Choi KY. Whole-cell biocatalysis using cytochrome P450 monooxygenases for biotransformation of sustainable bioresources fatty acids, fatty alkanes, and aromatic amino acids. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;40:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Herrero E, Ros J, Bellí G, Cabiscol E. Redox control and oxidative stress in yeast cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1780:1217–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sampedro J, Cosgrove DJ. The expansin superfamily. Genome Biol. 2005;6:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. de Paiva LB, Goldbeck R, dos Santos WD, Squina FM. Ferulic acid and derivatives: molecules with potential application in the pharmaceutical field. Brazilian J Pharm Sci. 2013;49:395–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mathew S, Abraham TE. Bioconversions of ferulic acid, an hydroxycinnamic acid. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2006;32:115–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Limtong S, Kaewwichian R, Yongmanitchai W, Kawasaki H. Diversity of culturable yeasts in phylloplane of sugarcane in Thailand and their capability to produce indole-3-acetic acid. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;30:1785–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lan T, Feng Y, Liao J, Li X, Ding C, Zhang D, et al. Biosorption behavior and mechanism of cesium-137 on Rhodosporidium fluviale strain UA2 isolated from cesium solution. J Environ Radioact. 2014;134:6–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu Z, Zhang S, Liu H, Shen H, Lin X, Yang F, et al. A multi-omic map of the lipid-producing yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohanta TK, Bae H. The diversity of fungal genome. Biol Proced Online. 2015;17:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Suzuki H, MacDonald J, Syed K, Salamov A, Hori C, Aerts A, et al. Comparative genomics of the white-rot fungi, Phanerochaete carnosa and P. chrysosporium, to elucidate the genetic basis of the distinct wood types they colonize. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Abdelaziz OY, Brink DP, Prothmann J, Ravi K, Sun M, García-Hidalgo J, et al. Biological valorization of low molecular weight lignin. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:1318–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Barnhart-Dailey MC, Ye D, Hayes DC, Maes D, Simoes CT, Appelhans L, et al. Internalization and accumulation of model lignin breakdown products in bacteria and fungi. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yaguchi A, Franaszek N, O’Neill K, Lee S, Sitepu I, Boundy-Mills K, et al. Identification of oleaginous yeasts that metabolize aromatic compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;47:801–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Allagulova CR, Gimalov FR, Shakirova FM, Vakhitov VA. The plant dehydrins: structure and putative functions. Biochem. 2003;68:945–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Graether SP, Boddington KF. Disorder and function: a review of the dehydrin protein family. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Durairaj P, Hur J-S, Yun H. Versatile biocatalysis of fungal cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Quistgaard EM, Löw C, Guettou F, Nordlund P. Understanding transport by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS): structures pave the way. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:123–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Mori K, Kamimura N, Masai E. Identification of the protocatechuate transporter gene in Sphingobium sp. strain SYK-6 and effects of overexpression on production of a value-added metabolite. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:4807–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. dos Santos OAL, Gonçalves TA, Sodré V, Vilela N, Tomazetto G, Squina FM, et al. Recombinant expression, purification and characterization of an active bacterial feruloyl-CoA synthase with potential for application in vanillin production. Protein Expr Purif. 2022;197:106–9.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gonçalves TA, Sodré V, da Silva SN, Vilela N, Tomazetto G, Araujo JN, et al. Applying biochemical and structural characterization of hydroxycinnamate catabolic enzymes from soil metagenome for lignin valorization strategies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106:2503–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sodré V, Araujo JN, Augusto Gonçalves T, Vilela N, Kimus Braz AS, Franco TT, et al. An alkaline active feruloyl-CoA synthetase from soil metagenome as a potential key enzyme for lignin valorization strategies. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Liberato MV, Araújo JN, Sodré V, Gonçalves TA, Vilela N, Moraes EC, et al. The structure of a prokaryotic feruloyl-CoA hydratase-lyase from a lignin-degrading consortium with high oligomerization stability under extreme pHs. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2020;1868:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Leggett RM, Clavijo BJ, Clissold L, Clark MD, Caccamo M. Sequence analysis NextClip: an analysis and read preparation tool for Nextera Long Mate Pair libraries. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:566–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinforma Appl NOTE. 2011;27(4):578–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A. Pilon: An Integrated Tool for Comprehensive Microbial Variant Detection and Genome Assembly Improvement. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Cantarel BL, Korf I, Robb SMC, Parra G, Ross E, Moore B, et al. MAKER An easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6743907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Stanke M, Waack S. Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Korf I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;5:1471–2210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sima FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. Genome analysis BUSCO assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:3420–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. McDowall J, Hunter S. InterPro protein classification. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;694:37–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Boutet E, Lieberherr D, Tognolli M, Schneider M, Bairoch A. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;406:89–112.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;38:D211–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4 0: Discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:95–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Schroeder A, Mueller O, Stocker S, Salowsky R, Leiber M, Gassmann M, et al. BMC Molecular Biology The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements. BMC Mol Biol. 2006;7:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;7(72):248–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Gadanho M, Sampaio JP, Spencer-Martins I. Polyphasic taxonomy of the basidiomycetous yeast genus Rhodosporidium: R. azoricum sp. Nov. Can J Microbiol. 2001;47:213–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Schoch CL, Ciufo S, Domrachev M, Hotton CL, Kannan S, Khovanskaya R, et al. NCBI taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2020;2020:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Shanmugam S, Gomes IA, Denadai M, dos Santos LB, de Souza Araújo AA, Narain N, et al. UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS identification, quantification of polyphenols from Passiflora subpeltata fruit pulp and determination of nutritional, antioxidant, α-amylase and α-glucosidase key enzymes inhibition properties. Food Res Int. 2018;108:611–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. He M, Peng G, Xie F, Hong L, Cao Q. Liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry with ROI strategy for non-targeted analysis of the in vivo/in vitro ingredients coming from Ligusticum chuanxiong hort. Chromatographia. 2019;82:1069–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Liu C, Zhang A, Yan GL, Shi H, Sun H, Han Y, et al. High-throughput ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry method for the rapid analysis and characterization of multiple constituents of Radix Polygalae. J Sep Sci. 2017;40:663–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thankfully acknowledge the staff of the Brazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR) from Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), for the genomic and transcriptomic analysis. In addition, we thank the staff of the Life Sciences Core Facility (LaCTAD) from State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), for the secretomic analysis.

Funding

This work was financially supported by grants from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (projects number: 15/50590-4, 20/05784-3) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (project number 306279/2020-7).  NV, TAG, VS, GT and ECM were supported by FAPESP fellowship (respectively: 2017/08166-6, 17/16089-1, 15/23279-6, 17/05901-7 and 14/26152-4). NV was supported by fellowship from Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Programa de Processos Tecnológicos e Ambientais, University of Sorocaba (UNISO), Sorocaba, Brazil

    Nathália Vilela & Fabio Marcio Squina

  2. Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil

    Nathália Vilela, Eduardo Cruz Moraes & André Damasio

  3. Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering (BCE), Aarhus University, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark

    Geizecler Tomazetto

  4. Photobiocatalysis Unit—CPBL, and Biomass Transformation Lab—BTL, École Interfacultaire de Bioingénieurs, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Thiago Augusto Gonçalves

  5. Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Victoria Sodré

  6. Brazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Brazil

    Gabriela Felix Persinoti

  7. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Philosophy Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

    Arthur Henrique Cavalcante de Oliveira

  8. Laboratory of Biology Chemical Microbial (LaBioQuiMi), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil

    Stephanie Nemesio da Silva & Taícia Pacheco Fill

Authors
  1. Nathália Vilela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geizecler Tomazetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thiago Augusto Gonçalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Victoria Sodré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabriela Felix Persinoti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eduardo Cruz Moraes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Arthur Henrique Cavalcante de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Stephanie Nemesio da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Taícia Pacheco Fill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. André Damasio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Fabio Marcio Squina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.V.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing (original draft, review and edited); G.T.: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis (bioinformatic), writing (original draft, review and edited); T.A.G.: conceptualization, investigation; V.S.: conceptualization, investigation, writing (review and edited); G.F.P.: investigation, formal analysis (bioinformatic); E.C.M.: investigation; A.H.C.O.: investigation; S.N.S.: investigation; T.P.F.: investigation, writing (review and edited); A.D.: resources, supervision, writing (review and edited); F.M.S.: conceptualization, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, writing (review and edited). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Marcio Squina.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Analysis of R. fluviale LM-2 tolerance to different concentrations of kraft lignin. R. fluviale LM-2 was pre-cultured in YPD medium for 24 h and several dilutions (10-1 to 10-7) were prepared for a spot plating assay. R. fluviale LM-2 was cultured in agar plates for 72 h with 1X YNB minimal medium containing kraft lignin in four concentrations: 1%, 0.5%, 0.25% and 0.125%. The positive control is an agar plate with 1X minimal medium.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Phylogenetic trees based on the ITS regions of R. fluviale LM-2. Sequences of the closest relatives were obtained from a BLASTn search against the NCBI nonredundant database using the ITS sequences as queries. Alignments were constructed using MAFFT (79), and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using RAxML (80) with the GTR+Gamma model and bootstrap algorithm with an automatic option. The results tree was visualized and manually edited using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de). The full circles on the branches represent the percentages of bootstrap replications.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Physiological test for the differentiation of R. fluviale from closely related species, R. azoricum. The cells were cultivated in liquid (A and B) and solid (C) media (YPD 2%) and incubated at 30 and 37 °C. Gadanho and collaborators (2001) reported that although R. fluviale and R. azoricum exhibit high similarity in the D1/D2 domain sequence (two mismatches), these species showed low reassociation values in DNA–DNA reassociation experiments, confirming that they are distinct species (81). In addition, Sampaio characterized physiological differences between the close species, in which R. fluviale could grow at 30 and 37 °C, while R. azoricum could not grow at 37 ℃ (32).

Additional file 4: Figure S4.

Most abundant Gene ontology (GO) terms assigned to the R. fluviale LM-2 genome. Only the top ten GO terms for each category are represented. GO term categories: biological process (green); cellular component (pink); molecular function (blue). The x-axis indicates the number of genes assigned to the same GO term. One unigene may be matched to multiple GO terms.

Additional file 5: Figure S5.

Outline of ferulic acid catabolism by R. fluviale LM-2. Based on genomic analysis, two catabolic pathways were predicted for ferulic acid bioconversion. A) Ferulic acid pathway I: ferulic acid conversion into vanillin in two steps with ATP consumption: i) CoA-thioesterification of ferulic acid by ferulic acid synthetase (FCS); ii) hydration of feruloyl-CoA by ferulic acid hydratase lyase (FCHL). B) Ferulic acid pathway II: cofactor-independent ferulic acid decarboxylation into 4-vinyl guaiacol (4-VG) by a phenolic acid decarboxylase (PDC).

Additional file 6: Figure S6.

Differential gene expression analysis of R. fluviale LM-2 in response to kraft lignin. A) Volcano plot. X-axis: Log2 fold change (with lignin/without lignin). Y-axis: negative log10-adjusted p value. Red data points indicate upregulated transcripts, green data points indicate downregulated transcripts, and gray data points indicate nonmodulated genes. B) Number of up- and downregulated and nonmodulated genes.

Additional file 7: Table S1.

Genomic reads details.

Additional file 8: Table S2.

Description and gene expression profile of the R. fluviale LM-2 genome (Excel table). S2.1) List of R. fluviale LM-2 genes (IDs) with functional prediction protein, protein length, EC number and GO terms based on Blast2Go (69) analysis. The presence or absence of signal peptides was identified using SignalP (73). The Cazy domain was identified using dbCAN (74). For the Log2Fold change values, p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Log2 fold change ≥ 1 was considered indicative of upregulation and Log2 fold change ≤ 1 was considered indicative of downregulation. S2.2) Number of genes with a GO separated by GO term categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. S2.3) Pfam domain for each gene with the name of the enzyme for aromatic degradation and the aromatic pathway to which it is related. S2.4) Expression profiles of ligninolytic and aromatic compound degradation genes in the R. fluviale LM-2 transcriptome.

Additional file 9: Table S3.

Top 10 up- and downregulated genes of R. fluviale LM-2.

Additional file 10: Table S4.

Phenolic compounds detected by UHPLC–MS/MS analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vilela, N., Tomazetto, G., Gonçalves, T.A. et al. Integrative omics analyses of the ligninolytic Rhodosporidium fluviale LM-2 disclose catabolic pathways for biobased chemical production. Biotechnol Biofuels 16, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02251-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02251-6

Keywords

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

ISSN: 2731-3654

Contact us