Skip to main content
Download PDF

Structural and functional analysis of the active cow rumen’s microbial community provides a catalogue of genes and microbes participating in the deconstruction of cardoon biomass

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts volume 17, Article number: 53 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ruminal microbial communities enriched on lignocellulosic biomass have shown considerable promise for the discovery of microorganisms and enzymes involved in digesting cell wall compounds, a key bottleneck in the development of second-generation biofuels and bioproducts, enabling a circular bioeconomy. Cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) is a promising inedible energy crop for current and future cellulosic biorefineries and the emerging bioenergy and bioproducts industries. The rumen microbiome can be considered an anaerobic “bioreactor”, where the resident microbiota carry out the depolymerization and hydrolysis of plant cell wall polysaccharides (PCWPs) through the catalytic action of fibrolytic enzymes. In this context, the rumen microbiota represents a potential source of microbes and fibrolytic enzymes suitable for biofuel production from feedstocks. In this study, metatranscriptomic and 16S rRNA sequencing were used to profile the microbiome and to investigate the genetic features within the microbial community adherent to the fiber fractions of the rumen content and to the residue of cardoon biomass incubated in the rumen of cannulated cows.

Results

The metatranscriptome of the cardoon and rumen fibre-adherent microbial communities were dissected in their functional and taxonomic components. From a functional point of view, transcripts involved in the methanogenesis from CO2 and H2, and from methanol were over-represented in the cardoon-adherent microbial community and were affiliated with the Methanobrevibacter and Methanosphaera of the Euryarchaeota phylum. Transcripts encoding glycoside hydrolases (GHs), carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs), carbohydrate esterases (CEs), polysaccharide lyases (PLs), and glycoside transferases (GTs) accounted for 1.5% (6,957) of the total RNA coding transcripts and were taxonomically affiliated to major rumen fibrolytic microbes, such as Oscillospiraceae, Fibrobacteraceae, Neocallimastigaceae, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Treponemataceae. The comparison of the expression profile between cardoon and rumen fiber-adherent microbial communities highlighted that specific fibrolytic enzymes were potentially responsible for the breakdown of cardoon PCWPs, which was driven by specific taxa, mainly Ruminococcus, Treponema, and Neocallimastigaceae.

Conclusions

Analysis of 16S rRNA and metatranscriptomic sequencing data revealed that the cow rumen microbiome harbors a repertoire of new enzymes capable of degrading PCWPs. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using metatranscriptomics of enriched microbial RNA as a potential approach for accelerating the discovery of novel cellulolytic enzymes that could be harnessed for biotechnology. This research contributes a relevant perspective towards degrading cellulosic biomass and providing an economical route to the production of advanced biofuels and high-value bioproducts.

Background

The development of economical and sustainable biomass conversion technologies for the production of lignocellulosic biofuels is needed to meet the one billion gallons renewable fuel requirement set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the 2013 Clean Air Act. Lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks, derived from farming dedicated energy crops and agro-based industries as waste by-products, have attracted increasing attention in the production of bio-based materials, chemical products, and biofuels [1].

Lignocellulosic biomass is outside the human food chain and its energetic content exceeds by many times the world’s basic energy requirements [2]. Lignocellulosic biomass is primarily composed of both complex matrices of polysaccharides (cellulose and hemicellulose) and lignin, which are the main constituents of plant cell walls. Because of this, they are together also called plant cell wall polysaccharides (PCWPs). Each of these components has a significant industrial use [3] for instance, lignin is used in the production of sulfur-free solid fuels, sub-bituminous coal, phenolic compounds, and natural binders with potential applications in agricultural practices. The chemical degradation of hemicellulose produces the solvent furfural, which is used at an industrial scale for the production of nylon-6, nylon-6,6, bio-plastics, and resins, while xylose, a sub-product of hemicellulose hydrolysis, can be used for the synthesis of bioethanol, xylitol, and organic acids [3]. In addition, valuable chemicals such as ethanol, lactic acids, acetone, and butanol are obtained as final products of cellulose fermentation [3]. However, due to its physicochemical composition and structural features, lignocellulose is recalcitrant to biological conversion, resulting in a high cost for pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis [4,5,6,7]. Therefore, several studies have focused on the discovery of efficient and economically viable enzymes and microorganisms that can be exploited at an industrial scale to significantly lower the cost of lignocellulosic biomass conversions [7,8,9].

Cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) is a perennial thistle tribe (Cynareae) of the sunflower family (Asteraceae) well-adapted to the Mediterranean climate with low water and fertilizers [10]. In addition, C. cardunculus can persist for over 10 years, re-sprouting annually from its large perennial taproot [11]. Therefore, cardoon is a suitable bioenergy crop for cultivation on marginal lands. In terms of productivity, cardoon can provide up to 30.0 t/ha year−1 (dry matter) of lignocellulosic biomass, which can be used either as a source of bioenergy and/or as raw material for paper pulp production [12,13,14,15]. Seeds obtained from the capitula are potentially used for oil and biodiesel production [10], while stalks can be used for paper production [16] or biogas [14]. Cardoon also has high nutritive and energy values, and has been recently proposed as alternative feedstuff ruminants [17, 18]. In addition, cardoon polysaccharides can be degraded to monosaccharides for bioethanol production [19, 20]. Such valuable end-products derive from the deconstruction of PCWPs, and efforts are put into the identification of enzymes and microorganisms that efficiently convert biomass into biofuels and bio-based materials [8, 9, 21]. Understanding the activity of the diverse enzymatic classes that act on the different components of the plant’s cell walls (cellulose, xylans, mannans, pectic substances, and phenylpropanoid polymers) is needed to achieve complete degradation of PCWPs [9]. In addition, as the chemical–physical characteristics of biomass feedstock vary widely, the optimization of the PCWPs degradation may require the combined action of enzymes that synergistically deconstruct each lignocellulosic fraction [22, 23]. Therefore, the development of optimized enzymatic cocktails delivering the best performances in the conversion of lignocellulose into valuable end-products still represents a major challenge in the applicability of such processes at an industrial scale [8]. In the last decades, with the rapid evolution of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, several studies were focused on the taxonomic and functional analysis of microbial communities colonizing biological niches, where the deconstruction of plant cell wall fibers is the central metabolism, e.g., termite gut, soil litter, and animal rumen [8, 24,25,26,27,28]. In this respect, the cow rumen represents a biological system in which microbes are specialized in the degradation of PCWPs. The rumen acts as a highly specialized bioreactor, where PCWPs are efficiently deconstructed via the combined action of enzymes produced by resident microorganisms [25]. Therefore, the study of the rumen microbiota would allow us to define that combination of enzymes and microorganisms that synergistically and optimally deconstructs PCWPs of such promising bio-energy crop, C. cardunculus.

The aim of this work was to compare the taxonomic and functional profiles of two microbial communities selected in the rumen environment. The first microbial community was selected by cardoon substrate incubated in the cow rumen within nylon bags, and considered enriched with microbes able to colonize and proliferate on the cardoon biomass up to 48 and 96 h incubation. The second microbial community was obtained from microbes proliferating in association with the solid fraction of the rumen. This microbial community was not selected towards a specific biomass because the forage is composed of different substrates (Additional file 1: Table S1) and subjected to daily turnover through feeding. By comparing these two microbial community, metatranscriptomic analyses of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and total RNA were performed to get insights into the microbes and enzymes mostly active on cardoon substrate and therefore applicable to PCWPs digestion processes. In particular, the taxonomic affiliation of the genes encoding for glycoside hydrolases (GHs), carbohydrate-binding motif (CBM), polysaccharide lyases (PLs), and carbohydrate esterases (CEs) has been assessed and the predominant genera involved in PCWPs degradation were identified. The expression profile of Carbohydrate-Active enZymes (CAZy) enzymes families was compared between cardoon- and rumen fibre-adherent microbial communities and the deconstruction of cardoon PCWPs was attributed to specific fibrolytic enzymes suitable for saccharification processes, whose expression was ascribed to specific taxonomic groups.

Results

In vitro and in vivo digestibility of cardoon biomass

In situ digestibility of cardoon biomass using the nylon bag technique

Six weeks before the in situ rumen incubation of cardoon nylon bags, three rumen-fistulated heifers were fed with a mixed diet containing 6 kg day−1 of grass hay, 2 kg day−1 of cardoon, and 1 kg day−1 of concentrate composed of decorticated sunflowers, soy beans, and wheat bran (Additional file 1: Table S1). In terms of chemical composition, cardoon and grass hay, the latter representing the main fibrous fraction of the animal diet, were similar except in the crude protein fraction which was almost double in grass hay (84.80 g kg−1 of dry matter) compared to cardoon (44.72 g kg−1 of dry matter). The introduction of small amount of cardoon into the animal diet was performed in order to stimulate the rumen microbiota this biomass, and ensuring that the nylon bags system will enrich for microbes actually able to colonize the cardoon and deconstruct its PCWPs fraction. After 6 weeks, the nylon bags containing only air-dried cardoon were incubated into the rumen of the three rumen-fistulated heifers to enrich for lignocellulolytic microorganisms involved in cardoon digestion. The incubation of the nylon bags in the rumen was carried out for a period of time of 48 and 96 h, and the metatranscriptomic profile of the cardoon-enriched microbial community at 48 (CRD48) and 96 h (CRD96) was compared against the metatranscriptome of the microbial community adherent to the solid fraction of the rumen (RMN), the latter collected from the same animal (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic of the sample preparation, collection, and NGS strategies employed in this study

Full size image

The digestibility and chemical composition of cardoon residue after 48 and 96 h incubation were measured to confirm that the metatranscriptomes of the microbial community enriched in the nylon bags is actively digesting the cardoon biomass. As a measure of the cardoon in situ digestibility, 54.8% and 70.5% of the cardoon dry matter and the 47.4% and 64.5% of initial fibrous fraction (NDF) were digested in the nylon bags after 48 and 96 h of incubation, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1 In situ digestibility (g kg−1 of initial weight), and chemical composition (g kg−1, dry matters basis) of the residue and ruminal solids
Full size table

With respect to the chemical composition of the cardoon residue in the nylon bags, high concentrations of ADF, ADL, and NDF were measured after 48 h incubation, with 24% increase in the lignification of the NDF fraction of the residue (Table 1). Conversely, no substantial increments in ADL, ADF and NDF were observed between 48 and 96 h incubation (Table 1). The lack of differences in the chemical composition between 48 and 96 h indicates that the microbial community enriched in the nylon bags is associated with the most recalcitrant fraction of the residue, since the less coriaceous fibrous fraction has been already degraded within the 48 h incubation period, but that this population is still active at 96 h of incubation in the rumen, as the digestibility of the cardoon DM increased between 48 and 96 h.

Taxonomy profiling of the active rumen and cardoon-adherent microbial communities

Microbial taxonomy profiling based on 16S rRNA (cDNA) amplicon sequencing data

From the viable microbial community, a total of 6,078 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) were assembled. Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Fibrobacteria, Spirocaethia, Negativicutes, and Coriobacteria were identified as the major colonizers of the RMN and CRD fibre-adherent microbial communities because represented by a large fraction of ASV with sample prevalence above 0.75 (Fig. 2) (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relative abundance of the top 25 Classes with the highest prevalence across all samples. Only Classes represented by at least one ASV (colored dot) with a prevalence (sample fraction) > 0.75 are shown. The horizontal dashed line indicates a prevalence of 0.1

Full size image

The alpha diversity indices Shannon and Chao1 indicate that the CRD-adherent microbial communities have higher diversity and richness compared to the RMN-adherent microbial communities (Additional file 1: Table S4). Differential abundance analysis identified 175 ASVs showing significant changes between CRD and RMN samples (Additional file 1: Table S5) and organized in three clusters, i.e., C1, C2, and C3 showing distinct abundance profiles across the RMN and CRD-adherent microbial community (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Heatmap clustering and taxonomic profiling of ASV differentially abundant between CRD48, CRD96, and RMN samples. The heatmap scale displays the row Z-score of the log10-transformed abundance data. K-means clustering was performed by setting ‘km = 3’ and the dashed line indicates the separation between the parent dendrogram and the child dendrograms. The sankey diagrams are used show the taxonomic composition of the differentially abundant ASVs. Only taxon with a relative abundance > 1% within each cluster (C1, C2, C3) are shown in the sankey diagram. Peptostreptococcales–Tissierellales are indicated as Pepto/Tissie

Full size image

Particularly, Butyrivibrio, Pseudobutyrivibrio, and Ruminococcus ASVs were more abundant in the RMN-adherent microbial communities, while a different population of Ruminococcus, along with Fibrobacter, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Treponema ASVs, were more abundant in the RMN-adherent microbial communities and CRD48 samples (Fig. 3). Finally, ASVs affiliated to the N4KA214 group (Oscillospiraceae), Desulfovibrio, Lachnospiraceae, Christensenellaceae, Anaerovoraceae, and Coriobacteriales were significantly more abundant in the CRD-adherent microbial communities samples (CRD48 and CRD96) (Fig. 3).

Microbial taxonomy profiling based on RNA-Seq data

RNA-seq reads from CRD and RMN samples were assembled into a reference metatranscriptome of 465,272 transcripts with an average length of 995.6 bp and an N50 1029 bp. A total of 363,975 transcripts were assigned to Bacteria (78.2%), while 21,895 and 27,679 transcripts were taxonomically affiliated to Archaea (4.70%) and Eukaryota (5.94%), respectively (Fig. 4; Additional file 1: Table S6).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Sankey diagram representing the taxonomic classification of transcripts of the CRD- and RMN-adherent microbial communities. Within each taxonomical rank, only the top 7 most abundant taxa are shown. On each node, the number of transcripts classified within a given taxon is displayed

Full size image

In agreement with 16S rRNA data, a large proportion of Bacteria transcripts were affiliated with Firmicutes (42.7%), followed by Bacteroidetes (16.7%), Spirochaetes (5.71%), and Fibrobacteres (4.66%) (Fig. 4; Additional file 1: Table S6). In addition, the RNA-seq analysis showed that Archaea and Eukaryota transcripts were affiliated with Methanobacteriaceae (4.36%) and Neocallimasticaceae, respectively (3.47%) (Fig. 4; Additional file 1: Table S6). Samplewise relative abundance analysis of the metatranscriptome coding fraction (mRNA) identifies Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Methanobacteria, Neocallimasticomycetes, Spirochaetia, and Fibrobacteria as the most abundant and active taxa in the CRD- and RMN fibre-adherent microbial communities (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Class level relative abundance and PCA analysis of the CRD and RMN-adherent microbial communities. A Relative abundance data are shown only for the top 8 most abundant Classes. B principal component analysis based on relative abundance data; arrows represent the top 6 Classes that mostly contribute to the separation between samples

Full size image

However, PERMANOVA analysis on Bray − Curtis dissimilarities highlights significant changes in terms of composition between the CRD- and RMN-adherent microbial communities (R2 = 0.659; P = 0.014) with Methanobacteria, Clostridia, and Neocallimasticomycetes mostly contributing to the differentiation between the two communities in the ordination plot (Fig. 5B).

Functional profiling of the cardoon- and rumen fiber-adherent microbial communities

The functional profiling of the transcripts representing the cardoon- and rumen fibre-adherent microbial community was performed to gain further insights into the most active taxa contributing to the degradation of cardoon PCWPs, and the methanogens boosting the cellulolytic activity of the fibre-degrading microbial community [29, 30].

A total of 236,836 transcripts were assigned to 97,946 phylogenetically refined orthologous groups (SdO, seed orthologs) (Additional file 1: Table S7). Functional annotation of SdO-associated transcripts identified 5,693 unique KEGG Orthologs (KOs) terms, some of them being associated with metabolic modules involved in pectin assimilation, and fermentation of sugars (hexoses and pentoses) into the volatile fatty acids (VFA) butyrate, propionate, and acetate (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Fig. 6 Transcriptionally active taxon in the expression of transcripts involved in pectin assimilation and VFAs biosynthesis. Bar plots show the relative abundance calculated from the total count of reads mapping to the metatranscriptome-assembled transcripts involved in pectin degradation (1), propionate biosynthesis (2), butyrate biosynthesis (3), and acetate biosynthesis (4). Relative abundance data are shown only for the top 8 most abundant taxon down to the family level

Full size image

Despite a large fraction of transcripts remaining classified at high taxonomic levels (i.e., Domain, Phylum, Class, and Order), major fibre-degrading taxa, such as Oscillospiraceae, Lachnospiraceae, Treponemataceae, and Prevotellaceae, resulted transcriptionally active in consideration of genes involved in the biosynthetic pathway of VFAs, and pectin assimilation (Fig. 6).

Because less diverse than its bacterial counterpart, the transcripts involved in methane metabolism were only affiliated with the methanogens Methanobrevibacter and Methanosphaera. In particular, transcripts associated with methane production from CO2 and H2 were affiliated with Methanobrevibacter, while the utilization of the methanogenic substrate methanol could be attributed to members of the Methanosphaera genus (Additional file 2).

The taxonomic affiliation of Carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZy)-coding transcripts was also investigated to identify the taxa and the enzymatic classes directly involved in the deconstruction of cardoon PCWPs. In total, 7,393 transcripts were found to encode for CAZy (Additional file 1: Table S8) of which 790, 234, 4,971, and 962 were annotated with at least one CBM, GH, CE, and PL functional domain, respectively. The highest number of transcripts in CRD and RMN samples with a CBM, GH, and PL domain belonged to Oscillospiraceae and Neocallimasticaceae, while Paludibacteraceae and Fibrobacteraceae accounted for the majority of CE transcripts (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Taxon contribution to the relative expression of the CAZy categories GH, CBM, CE, and PL. A–D Relative abundance calculated from the total count of reads mapping to the metatranscriptome-assembled transcripts annotated as glycoside hydrolases (GH, A), carbohydrate binding modules (CBM, B), carbohydrate esterases (CE, C) and polysaccharide lyases (PL, D). Only the top 8 most abundant taxon contributing to the expression of each CAZy category are shown

Full size image

The GH families predominantly present in RMN and CRD samples were GH43 and GH13, accounting, respectively, for 34% and 23% of the total GH transcripts (Additional file 1: Table S9). The domains CBM18, CBM37, and CBM1 were identified in 42%, 15%, and 10% of the transcripts with a CBM domain, while approximately 87% of the CE transcripts were annotated as CE6 (59%), CE11 (14%), and CE12 (13%) (Additional file 1: Table S9). Finally, the most abundant PL families identified in CRD and RMN samples were PL11 (37%), PL1 (34%), and PL9 (14%) (Additional file 1: Table S9). The above fibrolytic enzymes, therefore, represent the enzymatic repertory exploited by the fibre-degrading microbial community associated with both rumen and cardoon biomass.

Substrate-specific expression profile of the biomass-adherent microbial community

A total of 9,647 SdO representative of 44,622 transcripts were differentially expressed (DE) between CRD and RMN (FDR < 0.01) (Additional file 1: Table S10). Overall, the DE SdO clustered in two groups consisting of 7,038 SdO more expressed in RMN samples, and 2,609 SdO more expressed in the CRD fibre-adherent microbial community (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Taxonomic profiling of the differentially expressed seed orthologs between the CRD and RMN-adherent microbial communities. The heatmap scale displays the row Z-score of the CPM log2 transformed counts. K-means clustering on rows was performed by setting ‘km = 2’ and the dashed line indicates the separation between the parent dendrogram and the child dendrogram. Relative abundances were calculated from the total count of reads mapping to the metatranscriptome-assembled transcripts belonging to the differentially expressed seed orthologs in C1 and C2 clusters

Full size image

DE SdO were mostly represented by transcripts affiliated to major fibre-degrading families, i.e., Oscillospiraceae, Lachnospiraceae, Neocallimastigaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Treponemataceae, while transcripts affiliated to Methanobacteriaceae were only detected in the SdO significantly more expressed in the CRD samples (Fig. 8). Functional over-representation analysis indicates that the KEGG modules of the chemotaxis (M00506, CheA–CheYBV two-component regulatory system), multiple sugar transport systems (M00216), eukaryotic ribosome (M00177), F-type ATPase complex (M00157), and prokaryotic succinate dehydrogenase (M00149) were over-represented in the SdO significantly more expressed in the RMN fibre-adherent microbial community (Additional file 1: Table S11). Conversely, the methanogenesis modules (M00356, M00563, M00567, M00357) were over-represented in the SdO more expressed in the CRD fibre-adherent microbial community (Additional file 1: Table S11).

Within-taxon differential expression analysis in PCWPs degrading microbes

To account for biases introduced by organism-independent (global) scaling of metatranscriptomic counts data [31, 32], a within-taxon differential expression analysis was performed to better capture the contribution of PCWPs degrading microbes to the deconstruction of cardoon PCWPs. This analysis was conducted to better characterize the repertory of the CAZy-coding transcripts differentially expressed within the major PCWPs degrading families identified in our study, i.e., Oscillospiraceae, Fibrobacteraceae, Neocallimastigaceae, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Treponemataceae, and Paludibacteraceae (Fig. 4).

Oscillospiraceae and the anaerobic fungi Neocallimastigaceae were the families showing the highest percentage of transcripts and CAZy-coding transcripts differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05) between RMN and CRD samples, followed by Treponemataceae, Prevotellaceae, and Lachnospiraceae (Table 2).

Table 2 Differential expression (DE) analysis of transcripts affiliated with major fibre-degrading families in rumen and cardoon samples
Full size table

Specific families of carbohydrate-active enzymes were found to be over-represented (adjusted p value < 0.1) among the CAZy-coding transcripts significantly more expressed in the CRD-enriched microbial community (Fig. 9). Notably, within this community, Ruminococcus (Oscillospiraceae) exhibited a preference for overexpressing a set of carbohydrate-active enzymes represented by the GH26, GH105, CBM37, CBM77, and PL1 families, while Treponema (Treponemataceae) and Lachnospiraceae preferentially overexpressed the PL9 and GH26 CAZy-coding transcripts, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S14). These findings suggest that within the CRD-enriched microbial community, Ruminococcus, Treponema, and Lachnospiraceae selectively overexpress a distinct set of carbohydrate-active enzymes involved in the deconstruction of cardoon PCWPs.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Within-taxon differentially expressed transcripts coding for GH, CE, PL, and CBM fibrolytic enzymes. Only transcripts up-regulated in CRD48 and CRD96 samples with respect to the RMN samples are shown. The heatmap scale displays the row Z-score of the CPM log2 transformed counts

Full size image

Outside the ORA, all major fibre-degrading families, excluding the Ruminococcus, overexpressed one or more copies of GH43-coding transcripts in association with the cardoon-adherent microbial community (Fig. 9). In Ruminococcus, on the other hand, a large fraction of the GH-coding transcripts over-expressed in the cardoon-adherent microbial community were annotated as GH26, a family that includes members catalytically active towards mannans and xylans (Fig. 9).

Some degree of conservation regarding the over-expression of CAZy-coding transcript within the cardoon-adherent microbial community was also observed for the PL and CBM families which resulted also affiliated to Ruminococcus. For instance, Oscillospiraceae/Ruminococcus CBM- and PL-coding transcripts more expressed in the cardoon-adherent microbial samples were exclusively annotated as CBM77 and CBM37, and PL1 and PL9, respectively (Fig. 9). Similarly, Treponema PL-coding transcripts with a significantly higher expression in both CRD48 and CRD96 samples were also exclusively annotated as PL1 and PL9. Less diversified was also the pool of Neocallimastigaceae CBM- and PL-coding transcripts overexpressed in CRD fibre-adherent microbial community. Most of these transcripts were not classified down to genus/species level and belonged almost exclusively to the CBM18 family, which comprises only members with a chitin-binding activity, and the pectate lyases of the PL3 family. Finally, unlike for Ruminococcus, the repertory of Neocallimastigaceae GH-coding transcripts was much more diversified, including enzymes with different substrate specificity towards xylans (GH10, GH43), polygalactosamine (GH114), 4-O-methyl D-glucuronic acid (GH115), and glucans (GH124, GH45, GH6) (Fig. 9).

What is really interesting from the taxon-specific expression profiles shown in Fig. 9 is that the expression profile of Ruminococcus and, to less extent, Neocallimastigaceae CAZy-coding transcripts drop after 48 h, while for some taxa, i.e., Lachnospiraceae and Treponema, the expression of the CAZy-coding transcripts persist at higher level up to 96 h incubation in association with the most recalcitrant fraction of the cardoon residue.

Discussion

Cardoon is a promising bioenergy crop with multiple end-use applications in bioenergy and bioproduct industries, and as an alternative feedstuff for ruminants [18, 33].

In the present work, 16S rRNA cDNA amplicon sequencing and RNA-Seq metatranscriptomic were performed to detect, within the rumen microbiome, the most active microbial community and enzymes enriched in the nylon bags and involved in the deconstruction of cardoon PCWPs. The in situ experiments were conducted on three cannulated heifers fed on a daily (d) basis with a diet containing grass hay (6 kg d−1), cardoon (2 kg d−1), and concentrate (1 kg d−1). Because dietary factors, such as the chemical composition of the forage, can affect the ruminal microbiota composition, these can also potentially influence the rate of digestion of the biomass tested in the nylon bags [34]. Therefore, to stimulate the rumen microbiota to degrade the biomass tested in the nylon bags, a small fraction of cardoon was introduced into the animals diet. This can be considered a standard good practice for the in situ technique [35]. Indeed, without feeding the animal with a small amount of cardoon, the rumen microbiota would only partially respond to the tested biomass with the consequence of “enriching” the nylon bags with microbes that poorly degrade the cardoon. In addition, we were also interested in the enrichment of a microbiota that, with its enzymatic repertory, could act on a cardoon biomass incubated long enough in the rumen that could represent a matrix of difficult degradation. For this purpose, if the nylon bags are incubated into the rumen up to 96 h, this would allow the enrichment of a microbiota best suited to grow on a substrate which can be considered “exhausted” by the common microorganisms that preferentially proliferates associated to solid fraction of the rumen which instead is subjected to daily turnover through feeding. By measuring the chemical composition of the residue in the nylon bags we confirmed that the biomass incubated in the rumen was already exhausted, since no substantial increment in the NDF, ADF, and ADL fractions was observed between 48 and 96 h (Table 1).

The metabolic potential of the cardoon enriched microbial community

First, taxonomic analysis using both 16S rRNA cDNA amplicon sequencing and RNA-Seq-based metatranscriptomic identified Clostridia, Fibrobacteria, Spirocaethia, and Bacteroidia as major the fibre-degrading Classes [36,37,38,39], and Methanobacteria as the most active methanogenic Archaea (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5A). Further insights on the eukaryotic community colonizing CRD and RMN samples were obtained from RNA-Seq-based metatranscriptomic analysis, identifying, and expected, Neocallimastigomycetes as the eukaryotes colonizing both substrates (Fig. 4). Overall, the most striking differences observed between RMN and CRD samples were the overexpression of transcripts involved in methylotrophic (KEGG modules M00356 and M00563) and hydrogenotrophic (KEGG modules M00567) methanogenesis pathways in the CRD-adherent microbial community (Fig. 8; Additional file 1: Table S10–11). Such increase in the transcriptional activity of methanogens indicates an active production of methanogenic substrates such as CO2 and H2, methanol, and VFAs carried out by fibre-degrading taxa growing in association with the cardoon residue in the nylon bags. The main methanogens identified in our study were affiliated to Methanobrevibacter and Methanosphaera, which can perform methanogenesis from the substrates CO2 and H2, and methanol, respectively (Additional file 2) [40, 41]. In the rumen, one of the primary sources of methanol is pectin fermentation, as a result of a demethoxylation reaction catalyzed by pectin methyl esterases (PME, K01051) [42]. In agreement with a previous study [42], we found that in CRD and RMN samples, the major pectin degraders were represented by Bacteroidales (Bacteroides), Prevotellaceae, Oscillospiraceae (Ruminococcus), and Fibrobacteraceae (Fig. 6). Similar to methanol, bacterial fermentation of polysaccharides into the VFAs butyrate and acetate also promotes the Methanobrevibater methanogenesis [43], via acetate assimilation through an incomplete reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle [41]. In this respect, Lachnospiraceae were the only taxonomic group showing a higher relative abundance of the transcripts involved in acetate production in cardoon biomass (Fig. 6), which is in agreement with previous studies recognizing Lachnospiraceae as one of the major acetogens in the bovine rumen [44, 45].

GH families catalyzing the cellulose and hemicellulose breakdown in cardoon biomass

The fibrolytic enzymes coding transcripts detected in our samples were mostly restricted to a limited number of taxonomic groups represented by known PCWPs degrading-families, i.e., Oscillospiraceae, Fibrobacteraceae, Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Paludibacteraceae, Treponemataceae and Neocallimastigaceae (Fig. 7). While the data reported in this work highlighted that the majority of the GH families transcripts were annotated as GH43 and GH13 (Additional file 1: Table S9), Ruminococcus, and to less extent Treponema, preferentially overexpressed GH26-coding transcripts only within the CRD-enriched microbial community (Fig. 9). The GH43 family currently includes α-l-arabinofuranosidase, β-d-xylosidase, α-l-arabinanase, and β-d-galactosidase enzymes which catalyze the debranching and degradation of hemicellulose and pectin [46]. Members of the GH43 family also possess multifunctional exo-β-xylosidase, endo-xylanase, and α-arabinofuranosidase catalytic activities [47, 48]. In our study, Prevotella and Neocallimastigaceae were the only PCWPs degrading families showing GH43 transcripts significantly over-expressed in CRD samples (Fig. 9). In particular, the Neocallimastigaceae GH43 were classified as members of the GH43 subfamilies 1 (GH43_1) and 2 (GH43_2), which are catalytically active towards birchwood xylan, beta-xylan, linear arabinan, and pNP-α-L-arabinofuranoside [46, 49]. Compared to the subfamilies GH43_1 and GH43_2, the GH43_10 subfamily over-expressed by Prevotella (Fig. 9) possesses instead a much broader substrate specificity, being catalytically active against wheat and alpha–alpha arabinoxylans, sugar beet arabinan, and methylumbelliferyl-xylose [46]. The GH13 was the second most abundant GH family detected in our metatranscriptome (Additional file 1: Table S9), and it is considered one of the largest families of glycoside hydrolases [50]. The GH13 overexpressed in CRD samples resulted taxonomically affiliated to Lachnospiraceae and Prevotella, and significantly aligned against subfamilies (GH13_8, GH13_31, GH13_29, and GH13_40) of glucan branching enzymes, amylases, and glucan 1,6-α-glucosidases [50]. Finally, the majority of glycoside hydrolases overexpressed CRD samples by Ruminococcus belonged to the GH26 family. Members of this family are classified as hemicellulases represented by endo-β-1,4-mannanases and are typically produced by members of the genera Ruminococcus, Prevotella, and Fibrobacter [25]. However, a substantial drop in the GH26 expression was observed from 48 to 96 h incubation (Fig. 9), suggesting that Ruminococcus was transcriptionally less active in association with the most recalcitrant fraction of the cardoon residue.

Pectin breakdown in cardoon biomass

Pectin is a component of the middle lamella and primary cell wall of higher plants and is mainly composed of galacturonate units. Pectin degradation is carried out by the combined action of two enzymatic classes: methylesterases, which remove the methoxyl groups from pectin with the consequent depolymerization of the demethylated poly-galacturonate, and pectin lyases, which depolymerize pectin. Members of Bacteroidetes and Spirochetes (Treponema) were previously identified as the major pectinolytic organisms in host microbiomes [51,52,53,54]. In our study, transcripts annotated as PLs were affiliated with Neocallimastigaceae, Oscillospiraceae, Fibrobacteraceae, and Treponemataceae (Fig. 7). The majority of the PL transcripts overexpressed in CRD samples belonged to the polygalacturonate lyase families PL1, PL3, and PL9 [55, 56]. The PL3 family transcripts were affiliated with Neocallimastigaceae, whereas PL1 and PL9 belonged to Ruminococcus/Oscillospiraceae and Treponema (Treponemataceae). To date, while no functional studies have been carried out for PL1 and PL9 in Treponemataceae, members of this taxon were found to be particularly responsive to a pectin-rich diet and supposedly play an important role in pectin breakdown in the rumen [57, 58]. On the other hand, the Oscillospiraceae PL1 and PL9 were functionally characterized in Ruminococcus for their capacity to degrade pectin in a wide range of substrates. In particular, Ruminococcus PL1 and PL9 found in association with a CBM77 domain (CBM77PL1/9) are catalytically active towards homopolygalacturonan with low degrees of methyl esterification (DEs) and towards pectin associated to intact plant cell wall [59].

CBM motif involved in cardoon biomass deconstruction

Cellulases and hemicellulases catalytic domains are physically linked to CBM modules which participate in protein–carbohydrate interactions and facilitate the recognition and breakdown of PCWPs [60]. A significantly higher expression in CRD samples of the fungal CBM18 and Ruminococcus CBM37 families was observed in our study (Fig. 9). While the CBM37 is recognized as an important component of the Ruminococcus CAZy repertory because coordinates the cellulosome-independent fibrolytic activity of secreted carbohydrase [61], the fungal CBM18s are not directly involved in the recognition of PCWPs. Indeed, the CBM18 is a family of chitin-binding modules that can bind and protect the fungal cell wall from the catalytic action of chitinases [62]. Little is known about the physiological role of CBM18 modules in rumen fungi but a recent study suggests that these modules may play a role in fungal–methanogen physical associations, and fungal cell wall development and remodeling [63]. Therefore, in the context of PCWPs deconstruction, the CBM18 is not involved in the recognition and degradation of PCWPs but rather linked to the capacity of rumen fungi to colonize and compete against other microbes in the colonization of the cardoon biomass. The presence of an active growing mycelia in association with the cardoon biomass is further supported by the overexpression of Neocallimastigaceae Chitin-synthase coding transcripts in the CRD-enriched microbial community (Additional file 1: Table S13) [64].

The role of carbohydrate esterases in the reduction of cardoon biomass recalcitrance

Depending on the kind of biomass, xyloglucans, xylans, mannans, glucomannans, and β-glucans are the major components of the hemicellulose, the second most abundant component of the plant cell wall [65,66,67]. We did not characterize the hemicellulose composition of cardoon biomass used in this work. However, a previous study indicates that cardoon hemicellulose is composed of xylans, arabinans, galactans, and, only in a small percentage, mannans [68]. The breakdown of hemicellulose requires the combined action of different fibrolytic enzymes, such as acetyl xylan esterases, feruloyl and ferulic acid esterases, endoxylanases, and arabinofuranosidases, and starts with the removal of acetyl residues of the xylan backbone [66]. Furthermore, the hydrolysis of ferulic acids ester bonds cross-linking hemicellulose to lignin also contributes to the reduction of biomass recalcitrance by exposing the PCWPs to the enzymatic action of fibrolytic enzymes [69, 70]. While CE1 is the only family including the feruloyl esterases [70], the majority of CE coding transcripts identified in our metatranscriptome were acetyl xylan esterases of the family CE6 which catalyzes the release of acetic acid from acetylated xylan (Additional file 1: Table S9) [70]. None of the CE6 transcripts resulted significantly more expressed in CRD samples (Fig. 9).

Conclusions

The metatranscriptomic analysis of the cow rumen microbial communities enriched on cardoon lignocellulosic biomass, reported in this study, has provided a catalog of diversified carbohydrate-active enzymes potentially exploitable for the pretreatment of the lignocellulosic fraction of cardoon. Our data demonstrate that only a limited number of fibrolytic bacteria, namely, Lachnospiraceae and Treponemataceae, were able to persist up to 96 h in association with the most recalcitrant fraction of the cardoon fibres. However, further analysis will be necessary to test saccharification efficiency of such enzymes/microbes on cardoon PCWPs to validate their possible biotechnological applications. A different experimental and sequencing strategy will be also necessary to better explore the real contribution of rumen Eukaryotes to the degradation of cardoon PCWPs. While bacteria represent the most prominent fraction of the rumen microbiota, Eukaryotes, and in particular anaerobic fungi, are considered one of the best degraders plant polysaccharides. Our study did not specifically target the eukaryotic RNA via poly(A) enrichment, and as a consequence, we are likely underestimating the eukaryotic fraction of the rumen microbiota enriched in the cardoon nylon bags.

In conclusion, the cardoon fibre-adherent microbial community characterized in this study via metatranscriptomic analysis has the potential to be used in a range of biotechnological processes including biofuels, added value bioproducts and biomaterials for the biorefinery using cardoon biomass as renewable feedstock.

Materials and methods

Animal experiment

All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Piacenza, Italy) and were strictly in accordance with the University’s guidelines for animal research.

Three ruminally cannulated dairy heifers (body weight = 763 ± 106 kg) were used in this study. Each animal was fed a diet based on 6 kg day−1 of grass hay, 2 kg day−1 of cardoon, and 1 kg day−1 of concentrate (concentrate composition: decorticated sunflower, 15.0%; soybean, 44%; wheat bran, 10.4%; CaCO3, 2.6%; MgO, 1.2%; NaCl, 0.6%; NaHCO3, 2.4; CaHPO4.2(H2O), 1.8%) for 6 weeks before starting the in vivo trial. See Additional file 1: Table S1 for a detailed composition of animal diet. A mix of microminerals and vitamins was supplemented to the diet (Additional file 1: Table S15). Animals were fed twice a day, at 07:00 and 19:00, with the same amount of feed to minimize the fluctuation of feed intake on the rumen microbial community composition. Animals had free access to water.

Rumen and biomass-containing nylon bags sample collection

Cardoon plants growing under natural field conditions older than 3 years were harvested from the bioenergy farm of the Novamont S.p.A (Novara, Italy) in 2016. Cardoon biomass was supplied as part of the REBIOCHEM project consortium. The biomass was air-dried and ground to pass a 2 mm sieve using a Wiley mill. The ground material (10 g) was weighed into individual nylon bags with a mesh size of 50 µm and incubated in the rumen of three cannulated heifers. Digested cardoon biomass in nylon bags was collected through the rumen fistula after 48 and 96 h incubation time. In addition, digested fibers were collected from the rumen of each heifer before the early morning feeding. The samples were quickly washed in a sterile phosphate buffer solution, and the liquid excess was removed. The samples were immediately stored at -80 °C, until RNA extraction.

Fiber degradation analysis: in situ digestibility and chemical composition of cardoon biomass

Air-dried test cardon previously milled through a 1-mm screen using a Wiley knife mill were weighed into 10 × 20 cm polyester bags (R1020 Forage Bag, ANKOM Technology, Macedon NY, US) with a pore size of 50 microns at a rate of 20 mg/cm2 of the nylon bag area as suggested by Diao er al., 2020 [71]. The bags were incubated in sextuple in the rumen for 48 and 96 h. Bags corresponding to each incubation time were recovered, and three of them rinsed four times in physiological solution and three times in phosphate buffered saline solution, gently hand squeezing them after each step. At the end of the in situ experiment, the rumen content was collected from three sites (cranial sac, dorsal sac, and ventral sac), pooled, and placed in the nylon bags. These nylon bags were then treated as for the cardoon residues, i.e., washed with physiological and PBS solution, and gently hand-squeezed after each washing step to remove the excess fluid. After the last washing step, the bags containing the solid fraction of the rumen and the cardoon were immediately frozen on dry ice and then kept at − 80 °C until total RNA extraction. The other six cardoon nylon bags representing 48 and 96 h incubation time (3 × 48 h and 3 × 96 h) were recovered, rinsed in a washing machine for 5 min, hand squeezed, oven dried at 60 °C to constant weight, and finally weighed to calculate the residual dry matter. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) were determined on the residues using the procedures described in [72]. The fiber composition analysis before and after 48 and 96 h incubation time is reported in Table 1.

Total RNA extraction

Solid samples were pulverized in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted from 160 mg of cardoon biomass using the RNeasy PowerMicrobiome kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total nucleic acids were subjected to DNAse treatment following manufacturer instructions. In addition, the complete removal of DNA was verified by PCR with primers targeting the 16S rDNA gene. RNA integrity was assessed on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). RNA preparations used for subsequent next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation had an RNA integrity number (RIN) of ≥ 6.0. Aliquots of total RNA (2 µg each) were individually resuspended in RNAse-free water.

16S amplification and illumina MiSeq sequencing

One µg of total RNA was retrotranscribed using the cDNA high-capacity reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The cDNA was diluted 1:40 in nucleic acid-free water and then used as a sample to produce 16S libraries according to the Illumina 16S metagenomic sequencing library protocol using PCR primers targeting a fragment of the 16S rRNA gene (V3–V4 region). Equimolar amounts of the generated libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform using MiSeq reagent kits following the 2 × 300-bp paired-end sequencing protocol. Approximately 400.000 reads per sample were produced.

Read analysis was conducted using DADA2 in the QIIME2 v2022.2 pipeline [73, 74]. The resulting amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were classified against a pre-trained classifier (link: https://data.qiime2.org/2022.2/common/silva-138-99-nb-weighted-classifier.qza; last accessed on July 2022) based on the bacterial and archaeal SILVA database v138.1 [75]. The R package "phyloseq” [76] v1.38.0 was used in conjunction with microbiomeMarker v1.0.2 [77]. The alpha diversity indices Chao1 and Shannon were calculated using phyloseq, while microbiomeMarker was used to perform an ANOVA-like differential abundance analysis [78,79,80] of ASVs applying a p values correction for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) false discovery rate (FDR) procedure (FDR < 0.01).

Illumina HiSeq RNA sequencing

The amount of total RNA used for sequencing was 1 µg. To maximize mRNA representation in the metatranscriptomic libraries, the Ribo-Zero rRNA removal kit (Bacteria) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to remove rRNAs from the total RNA preparations. Library preparation was performed using the Illumina TruSeq stranded total RNA kit (Illumina). Sequencing was carried out using an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. In total, 178 million of paired-end reads were generated from nine independent libraries: three libraries from rumen solid samples, three libraries from cardoon biomass digested for 48 h, and three libraries from cardoon biomass digested for 96 h.

De novo metatranscriptome assembly and annotation

A de novo co-assembly was used to assemble RNA-Seq reads from CRD and RMN samples into transcripts using Trinity v2.14.0 [81]. Only transcripts having a minimum length of 500 bp were used for downstream analyses. Mmseq2 v13.45111 2bLCA (low common ancestor) protocol [82] was used for the taxonomic classification of transcripts with the option “–orf-filter 0”, to disable the rejection of short-query transcripts when performing searches against the NCBI non-redundant (NR) protein database (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/db/FASTA/; last accessed in August 2022) The module “mmseqs search” was used for the annotation of transcripts against the carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) database v8 [83] (http://bcb.unl.edu/dbCAN2/download/; last accessed in August 2022) with the following option: “-s 7.5 –alignment-mode 3 –min-seq-id 0.35 –cov 0.6”. Finally, eggNOG-mapper v2.1.9 and the eggNOG database v5.0.2 [84] (http://eggnog5.embl.de/download/emapperdb-5.0.2/; last accessed in August 2022) were used to annotate transcripts against phylogenetically refined orthologous groups (seed orthologues), and against the functional KEGG orthologs (KO) with the following options “–itype metagenome –genepred search –sensmode ultra-sensitive –query_cover 60 –pident 40”.

Metatranscriptomic data analysis

All metatranscriptomic data were analyzed using the R statistical software v4.1.3. Transcript quantification was performed with Salmon v1.3.0 [85]. Salmon quant files were imported into R using tximport v1.22.0 [86], rRNA transcripts were removed using SortMeRNA v4.3.6 [87], and transcripts abundance data were adjusted for the effect of transcript length. The “adonis2” function from the package vegan v2.6–2 [88] was used to perform a permutational univariate analysis of variance on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities calculated using the Phyloseq “distance” function [76]. For differential abundance analysis between CRD and RMN samples, the transcripts abundance data adjusted for the effect of transcript length were binned into seed orthologs based on eggNOG annotation. The seed orthologs count table was finally analyzed with edgeR v3.36.0 [89] based on quantile-adjusted conditional maximum likelihood method. Differential abundance of seed orthologs was considered significant for FDR-adjusted p values < 0.01. The same statistical approach was used to perform a within-taxon differential expression analysis for transcripts affiliated to Prevotellaceae, Fibrobacteraceae, Lachnospiraceae, Neocallimastigaceae, Oscillospiraceae, and Treponemataceae. Transcripts were considered differentially expressed between CRD and RMN samples for FDR-adjusted p values < 0.01.

Metabolic potential of CRD and RMN microbial community and functional enrichment

KO and KEGG modules associated with transcripts via eggNOG annotation were used to identify transcripts involved in methanogenesis, degradation of pectin, and synthesis of SCFAs acetate, butyrate, and propionate. Butyrate production was determined by searching for transcripts annotated as phosphate butyryltransferase (K00634; ptb), butyrate kinase (K00929; buk), acetate CoA/acetoacetate CoA-transferase alpha subunit (K01034; atoD), acetate CoA/acetoacetate CoA-transferase beta subunit (K01035; atoA), and acetate CoA-transferase (K19709; ydiF). KOs used for the identification of transcripts involved in the synthesis of propionate were: methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (K01847; MUT), methylmalonyl-CoA mutase, N-terminal domain (K01848; mcmA1), methylmalonyl-CoA mutase, C-terminal domain (K01849; mcmA2), methylmalonyl-CoA decarboxylase (K11264; mmcD), and methylmalonyl-CoA/ethylmalonyl-CoA epimerase (K05606; MCEE). Transcripts annotated as acetate-CoA ligase (ADP-forming) subunit alpha (K01905; acdA), acetate-CoA ligase (ADP-forming) subunit beta (K22224; acdB), and acetate-CoA ligase (ADP-forming) (K24012; acdAB) were used for assessment of acetate production. Finally, the capacity to break down pectin was evaluated by searching for transcripts annotated in the pectin degradation KEGG module M00081. To identify the major methanogenic pathways occurring in our metatranscriptomic data, we searched for transcripts involved in methane synthesis from acetate (K00193; K00194; K00197), methanol (K04480; K14080; K14081), methylamines (K14083; K14082; K14084; K16178; K16179; K16177; K16176), and CO2 (K00200; K00201; K00202; K00203; K11261; K00205; K11260; K00204; K00672; K01499; K00319; K13942; K00320). The R package clusterProfiler v4.2.2 [90] was used to identify over-represented KEGG modules in clusters of differentially abundant seed orthologs. KEGG modules were considered significantly enriched for FDR-adjusted p values < 0.05.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the NCBI Short Read Archive repository under the BioProject accession number PRJNA659627. The metatranscriptome assembled transcripts and the R codes used in our analyses are available in the Figshare repository, doi: 10..6084/m9.figshare.22680448.

Abbreviations

ADF:

Acid detergent fiber

ADL:

Acid detergent lignin

ASV:

Amplicon sequence variants

BLAST:

Basic local alignment search tool

CAZy:

Carbohydrate-active enzymes

CBM:

Carbohydrate binding modules

CE:

Carbohydrate esterase

CPM:

Count per million

CRD:

Cardoon

DR:

Dry matter

FDR:

False discovery rate

GH:

Glycoside hydrolase

GT:

Glycosyl transferase

KEGG:

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

KO:

KEGG orthology

LCA:

Low common ancestor

LFC:

Log2 fold change

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

NCBI:

National center for biotechnology information

NDF:

Neutral detergent fiber

NR:

Non-redundant

OTU:

Operational taxonomic unit

PBS:

Phosphate buffer solution

PC:

Principal component

PCWPs:

Plant cell wall polysaccharides

PL:

Polysaccharide lyases

qCML:

Quantile-adjusted conditional maximum likelihood

RMN:

Rumen

SdO:

Seed orthologs

References

  1. Anwar Z, Gulfraz M, Irshad M. Agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass a key to unlock the future bio-energy: a brief review. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2014;7:163–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandes DLA, Pereira SR, Serafim LS, Evtuguin DV, Xavier AMRB, Fernandes DLA, et al. Second generation bioethanol from lignocellulosics: processing of hardwood sulphite spent liquor. Bioethanol IntechOpen. 2012;35:124–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Y-HP. Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35:367–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96:673–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Himmel ME, Ding S-Y, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, et al. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science. 2007;315:804–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chundawat SPS, Beckham GT, Himmel ME, Dale BE. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2011;2:121–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pattathil S, Hahn MG, Dale BE, Chundawat SPS. Insights into plant cell wall structure, architecture, and integrity using glycome profiling of native and AFEXTM-pre-treated biomass. J Exp Bot. 2015;66:4279–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, Kim T-W, Chokhawala H, Schroth G, et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science. 2011;331:463–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. da Lopes AMC, Lins RMG, Rebelo RA, Łukasik RM. Biorefinery approach for lignocellulosic biomass valorisation with an acidic ionic liquid. Green Chem. 2018;20:4043–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández J, Curt MD, Aguado PL. Industrial applications of Cynara cardunculus L. for energy and other uses. Ind Crops Prod. 2006;24:222–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Archontoulis SV, Struik PC, Vos J, Danalatos NG. Phenological growth stages of Cynara cardunculus: codification and description according to the BBCH scale. Ann Appl Biol. 2010;156:253–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mantineo M, D’Agosta GM, Copani V, Patanè C, Cosentino SL. Biomass yield and energy balance of three perennial crops for energy use in the semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res. 2009;114:204–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gominho J, Lourenço A, Palma P, Lourenço ME, Curt MD, Fernández J, et al. Large scale cultivation of Cynara cardunculus L. for biomass production—a case study. Ind Crops Prod. 2011;33:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliveira I, Gominho J, Diberardino S, Duarte E. Characterization of Cynara cardunculus L. stalks and their suitability for biogas production. Ind Crops Prod. 2012;40:318–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Portis E, Acquadro A, Tirone M, Pesce GR, Mauromicale G, Lanteri S. Mapping the genomic regions encoding biomass-related traits in Cynara cardunculus L. Mol Breed. 2018;38:64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gominho J, Fernandez J, Pereira H. Cynara cardunculus L.—a new fibre crop for pulp and paper production. Ind Crops Prod. 2001;13:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Genovese C, Platania C, Venticinque M, Calderaro P, Argento S, Scandurra S, et al. Evaluation of cardoon seeds presscake for animal feeding. Acta Hortic. 2016. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1147.45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salami SA, Valenti B, Luciano G, Lanza M, Umezurike-Amahah NM, Kerry JP, et al. Dietary cardoon meal modulates rumen biohydrogenation and bacterial community in lambs. Sci Rep. 2021;11:16180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandes MC, Ferro MD, Paulino AFC, Mendes JAS, Gravitis J, Evtuguin DV, et al. Enzymatic saccharification and bioethanol production from Cynara cardunculus pretreated by steam explosion. Bioresour Technol. 2015;186:309–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernandes MC, Ferro MD, Paulino AFC, Chaves HT, Evtuguin DV, Xavier AMRB. Comparative study on hydrolysis and bioethanol production from cardoon and rockrose pretreated by dilute acid hydrolysis. Ind Crops Prod. 2018;111:633–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harrison MD, Zhang Z, Shand K, Chong BF, Nichols J, Oeller P, et al. The combination of plant-expressed cellobiohydrolase and low dosages of cellulases for the hydrolysis of sugar cane bagasse. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Borin GP, Sanchez CC, de Souza AP, de Santana ES, de Souza AT, Paes Leme AF, et al. Comparative secretome analysis of Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger during growth on sugarcane biomass. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0129275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. de Lourdes T.M. Polizeli M, Somera AF, de Lucas RC, Nozawa MSF, Michelin M. Enzymes involved in the biodegradation of sugarcane biomass: challenges and perspectives. Adv Basic Basic Sci Second Generation Bioethanol Sugarcane. 2017; 55–79.

  24. Pankratov TA, Ivanova AO, Dedysh SN, Liesack W. Bacterial populations and environmental factors controlling cellulose degradation in an acidic Sphagnum peat. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:1800–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai X, Tian Y, Li J, Luo Y, Liu D, Zheng H, et al. Metatranscriptomic analyses of plant cell wall polysaccharide degradation by microorganisms in the cow rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:1375–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. López-Mondéjar R, Zühlke D, Becher D, Riedel K, Baldrian P. Cellulose and hemicellulose decomposition by forest soil bacteria proceeds by the action of structurally variable enzymatic systems. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Woon JS-K, King PJH, Mackeen MM, Mahadi NM, Wan Seman WMK, Broughton WJ, et al. Cloning, production and characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 7 enzyme from the gut microbiota of the termite Coptotermes curvignathus. Mol Biotechnol. 2017;59:271–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kolinko S, Wu Y-W, Tachea F, Denzel E, Hiras J, Gabriel R, et al. A bacterial pioneer produces cellulase complexes that persist through community succession. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:99–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Piao H, Lachman M, Malfatti S, Sczyrba A, Knierim B, Auer M, et al. Temporal dynamics of fibrolytic and methanogenic rumen microorganisms during in situ incubation of switchgrass determined by 16S rRNA gene profiling. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu H, Ng S-K, Jia Y, Cai M, Lee PKH. Physiological and molecular characterizations of the interactions in two cellulose-to-methane cocultures. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Klingenberg H, Meinicke P. How to normalize metatranscriptomic count data for differential expression analysis. PeerJ. 2017;5: e3859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Y, Thompson KN, Huttenhower C, Franzosa EA. Statistical approaches for differential expression analysis in metatranscriptomics. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:i34-41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Gominho J, Curt MD, Lourenço A, Fernández J, Pereira H. Cynara cardunculus L. as a biomass and multi-purpose crop: a review of 30 years of research. Biomass Bioenerg. 2018;109:257–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vanzant ES, Cochran RC, Titgemeyer EC. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:2717–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. López S. In vitro and in situ techniques for estimating digestibility. Quant Asp Rumin Dig Metab. 2005;87–121.

  36. Jami E, Mizrahi I. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e33306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Li F, Henderson G, Sun X, Cox F, Janssen PH, Guan LL. Taxonomic assessment of rumen microbiota using total RNA and targeted amplicon sequencing approaches. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:987.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li F, Guan LL. Metatranscriptomic profiling reveals linkages between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency in beef cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e00061-e117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Noel SJ, Attwood GT, Rakonjac J, Moon CD, Waghorn GC, Janssen PH. Seasonal changes in the digesta-adherent rumen bacterial communities of dairy cattle grazing pasture. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0173819.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fricke WF, Seedorf H, Henne A, Krüer M, Liesegang H, Hedderich R, et al. The genome sequence of Methanosphaera stadtmanae reveals why this human intestinal archaeon is restricted to methanol and H2 for methane formation and ATP synthesis. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:642–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Samuel BS, Hansen EE, Manchester JK, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Fulton R, et al. Genomic and metabolic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10643–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Kelly WJ, Leahy SC, Kamke J, Soni P, Koike S, Mackie R, et al. Occurrence and expression of genes encoding methyl-compound production in rumen bacteria. Anim Microbiome. 2019;1:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tanvir RU, Ahmed M, Lim TT, Li Y, Hu Z. Arrested methanogenesis: rinciples, practices, and perspectives. Adv Bioenerg. 2022;7:1–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gagen EJ, Denman SE, Padmanabha J, Zadbuke S, Al Jassim R, Morrison M, et al. Functional gene analysis suggests different acetogen populations in the bovine rumen and tammar wallaby forestomach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:7785–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gagen EJ, Padmanabha J, Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Hydrogenotrophic culture enrichment reveals rumen Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae acetogens and hydrogen-responsive Bacteroidetes from pasture-fed cattle. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mewis K, Lenfant N, Lombard V, Henrissat B. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 43 into subfamilies: a motivation for detailed enzyme characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:1686–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Limsakul P, Phitsuwan P, Waeonukul R, Pason P, Tachaapaikoon C, Poomputsa K, et al. A novel multifunctional arabinofuranosidase/endoxylanase/β-xylosidase GH43 enzyme from Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus B-6 and its synergistic action to produce arabinose and xylose from cereal arabinoxylan. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87: e0173021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rodríguez-Sanz A, Fuciños C, Torrado AM, Rúa ML. Extraction of the wheat straw hemicellulose fraction assisted by commercial endo-xylanases. Role of the accessory enzyme activities. Ind Crops Prod. 2022;179:114655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Helbert W, Poulet L, Drouillard S, Mathieu S, Loiodice M, Couturier M, et al. Discovery of novel carbohydrate-active enzymes through the rational exploration of the protein sequences space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:6063–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Stam MR, Danchin EGJ, Rancurel C, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of α-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2006;19:555–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sirotek K, Marounek M, Rada V, Benda V. Isolation and characterization of rabbit caecal pectinolytic bacteria. Folia Microbiol. 2001;46:79–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dongowski G, Lorenz A, Proll J. The degree of methylation influences the degradation of pectin in the intestinal tract of rats and in vitro. J Nutr. 2002;132:1935–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sirotek K, Slováková L, Kopecný J, Marounek M. Fermentation of pectin and glucose, and activity of pectin-degrading enzymes in the rabbit caecal bacterium Bacteroides caccae. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004;38:327–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gharechahi J, Vahidi MF, Sharifi G, Ariaeenejad S, Ding X-Z, Han J-L, et al. Lignocellulose degradation by rumen bacterial communities: New insights from metagenome analyses. Environ Res. 2023;229: 115925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hage H, Rosso M-N. Evolution of fungal carbohydrate-active enzyme portfolios and adaptation to plant cell-wall polymers. J Fungi. 2021;7:185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Rosso M-N, Berrin J-G, Lomascolo A. Plant wastes and sustainable refineries: What can we learn from fungi? Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2022;34: 100602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu J, Wang J-K, Zhu W, Pu Y-Y, Guan L-L, Liu J-X. Monitoring the rumen pectinolytic bacteria Treponema saccharophilum using real-time PCR. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;87:576–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Svartström O, Alneberg J, Terrapon N, Lombard V, de Bruijn I, Malmsten J, et al. Ninety-nine de novo assembled genomes from the moose (Alces alces) rumen microbiome provide new insights into microbial plant biomass degradation. ISME J. 2017;11:2538–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Venditto I, Luis AS, Rydahl M, Schückel J, Fernandes VO, Vidal-Melgosa S, et al. Complexity of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome reflects an expansion in glycan recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:7136–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Fontes CMGA, Gilbert HJ. Cellulosomes: highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:655–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Christopherson MR, Dawson JA, Stevenson DM, Cunningham AC, Bramhacharya S, Weimer PJ, et al. Unique aspects of fiber degradation by the ruminal ethanologen Ruminococcus albus 7 revealed by physiological and transcriptomic analysis. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:1066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Volk H, Marton K, Flajšman M, Radišek S, Tian H, Hein I, et al. Chitin-binding protein of Verticillium nonalfalfae disguises fungus from plant chitinases and suppresses chitin-triggered host immunity. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact MPMI. 2019;32:1378–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Brown JL, Swift CL, Mondo SJ, Seppala S, Salamov A, Singan V, et al. Co-cultivation of the anaerobic fungus Caecomyces churrovis with Methanobacterium bryantii enhances transcription of carbohydrate binding modules, dockerins, and pyruvate formate lyases on specific substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14:234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Gay L. Chitin content and chitin synthase activity as indicators of the growth of three different anaerobic rumen fungi. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991;64:99–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Scheller HV, Ulvskov P. Hemicelluloses. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:263–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sun J, Tian C, Diamond S, Glass NL. Deciphering transcriptional regulatory mechanisms associated with hemicellulose degradation in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell. 2012;11:482–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Pauly M, Gille S, Liu L, Mansoori N, de Souza A, Schultink A, et al. Hemicellulose biosynthesis. Planta. 2013;238:627–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ballesteros M, José Negro M, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, Sáez F, Oliva JM. Fractionation of Cynara cardunculus (cardoon) biomass by dilute-acid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007;137–140:239–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, et al. Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27:663–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Nakamura AM, Nascimento AS, Polikarpov I. Structural diversity of carbohydrate esterases. Biotechnol Res Innov. 2017;1:35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Diao X, Dang S, Liu S, Jing L, Wang Y, Zhang W. Determination of the appropriate ratio of sample size to nylon bag area for in situ nylon bag technique evaluation of rumen digestibility of feedstuffs in sheep. Livest Sci. 2020;241: 104254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Goering HK (Harold K, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analyses:apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications. 1970;iv, 20 : ill.; 26 cm.-USDA.

  73. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e61217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Cao Y, Dong Q, Wang D, Zhang P, Liu Y, Niu C. microbiomeMarker: an R/Bioconductor package for microbiome marker identification and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2022;38:4027–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Fernandes AD, Macklaim JM, Linn TG, Reid G, Gloor GB. ANOVA-Like Differential Expression (ALDEx) analysis for mixed population RNA-Seq. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e67019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Fernandes AD, Reid JN, Macklaim JM, McMurrough TA, Edgell DR, Gloor GB. Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome. 2014;2:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Gloor GB, Macklaim JM, Fernandes AD. Displaying variation in large datasets: plotting a visual summary of effect sizes. J Comput Graph Stat. 2016;25:971–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Steinegger M, Söding J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:1026–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F, Xu Y. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W445-451.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:5825–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14:417–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. Research. 2015;4:1521.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2012;28:3211–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, et al. vegan community ecology package version 2.6–2 April 2022. 2022.

  89. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innov Camb Mass. 2021;2:100141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Novamont S.p.A (Novara, Italy) for providing cardoon biomass materials, to IGA Technology Services S.r.l (Udine, Italy) for the metatranscriptome sequencing, and to Personal Genomics S.r.l (Verona, Italy) for the 16S rRNA sequencing.

Funding

This research was supported by the Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research (MIUR) as part of the National Technology Cluster of Green Chemistry SPRING—Sustainable Processes and Resources for Innovation and National Growth (grant n. CTN01-00063–49393—REBIOCHEM project) awarded to A.L.H. This research was also supported by the “Network 4 Energy Sustainable Transition—NEST” project (MIUR project code PE000021, Concession Degree No. 1561 of 11 October 2022) in the framework of the NextGenerationEU PNRR plan (CUP C93C22005230007). We also acknowledge the Brain Gain (Rientro dei Cervelli) MIUR professorship to A.L.H.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Andrea Firrincieli and Andrea Minuti share the first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis Snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy

    Andrea Firrincieli, Marco Ferilli, Maurizio Petruccioli & Antoine L. Harfouche

  2. Department of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122, Piacenza, Italy

    Andrea Minuti, Paolo Ajmone-Marsan & Paolo Bani

  3. Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126, Bologna, Italy

    Martina Cappelletti

  4. Molecular Genetics and Functional Genomics, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, 00146, Rome, Italy

    Marco Ferilli

  5. CREI - Romeo and Enrica Invernizzi Research Center On Sustainable Dairy Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense, 84, 29122, Piacenza, Italy

    Paolo Ajmone-Marsan

Authors
  1. Andrea Firrincieli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Minuti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martina Cappelletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Ferilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paolo Ajmone-Marsan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paolo Bani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maurizio Petruccioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Antoine L. Harfouche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.L.H. conceived the study. A.F., P.B., and A.L.H. designed the study. A.M. and P.B. performed the animal and nylon bags experiments as well as the chemical analysis. A.F. performed the RNA sampling, extraction, and bioinformatics data analyses. M.F. participated in the bioinformatics analyses. M.C. contributed to the taxonomy analyses and interpretation of the 16S rRNA sequencing data. A.F., A.M., M.C. and A.L.H. wrote the manuscript, with critical feedback from P.A-M. and M.P. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine L. Harfouche.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Composition of the ingredients and calculated composition of the diets fed to cannulated heifers during the trial; Table S2. Chemical composition of the cardoon residue in the nylon bags, rumen solid fraction, and undigested cardoon biomass; Table S3. Relative abundance and prevalence of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in cardoon (CRD) and rumen (RMN) samples; Table S4. Alpha diversity estimators for cardoon (CRD) and rumen (RMN) samples; Table S5. Differentially abundant amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) predicted via GLM–ANOVA and k-mean clustering results; Table S6. MMseqs2 LCA taxonomy report used to generate the Sankey plot in Pavian; Table S7. eggNOG annotation of transcript in RMN- and CRD-adherent microbial community; Table S8. MMseqs2 transcriptome annotation against the Carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) database; Table S9. CAZy families frequencies; Table S10. Transcripts associated to differentially expressed seed orthologs; Table S11. KEGG module enrichment analysis of transcripts associated to differentially expressed seed orthologs; Table S12. Differentially expressed transcripts within major fiber degrading Taxon; Table S13. Differentially expressed CAZy transcripts within major fiber degrading Taxon; Table S14. Over-representation analysis (ORA) results of the CAZy families over-represented within the CAZy-coding transcripts more expressed in the CRD-enriched microbial community; Table S15. Micromineral and vitamin content supplemented to the fed.

Additional file 2:

Taxonomic composition and relative abundances of transcripts involved in the methylotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic pathways. Relative abundances were calculated from the total count of reads mapping to the metatranscriptome-assembled transcripts involved in methanol (A), H2/CO2 (B), and methylamine (C) methanogenic pathways.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Firrincieli, A., Minuti, A., Cappelletti, M. et al. Structural and functional analysis of the active cow rumen’s microbial community provides a catalogue of genes and microbes participating in the deconstruction of cardoon biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 17, 53 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-024-02495-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-024-02495-4

Keywords

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

ISSN: 2731-3654

Contact us