Skip to main content

Table 6 Strain comparison

From: Xylose reductase from Pichia stipitis with altered coenzyme preference improves ethanolic xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Strain Relevant genotype Dilution rate Xylose consumption rate Ethanol yield Xylitol yield Reference
TMB3001 XYL1, XYL2, XKS1 0.06 0.12 0.37 0.52 [13]
TMB3260 (2 × XYL1), XYL2, XKS1 0.06 0.19 0.36 0.58 [13]
TMB3270 XYL1(K270M), XYL2, XKS1 0.06 0.05 0.40 0.31 [13]
TMB3271 (2 × XYL1(K270M)), XYL2, XKS1 0.06 0.16 0.40 0.44 [13]
TMB3400 XYL1, XYL2, XKS1, Mutated TMB3399 0.06 0.22 0.35 0.19 [1]
C1 XYL1, XYL2, XKS1, Evolved TMB3001 0.05 0.31 0.27a 0.35a [38]
Y-PsNative XYL1, XYL2, XKS1, ΔGRE3, overexpressed non-oxidative PPP 0.06 0.19 0.37 0.30 This work
Y-PsK270R XYL1(K270R), XYL2, XKS1, ΔGRE3, overexpressed non-oxidative PPP 0.06 0.22 0.39 0.12 This work
  1. Xylose consumption rate (g (g biomass)-1 h-1), ethanol yield (g (g consumed sugars)-1) and xylitol yield (g (g consumed xylose)-1) in anaerobic continuous fermentation with recombinant S. cerevisiae strains, 10 g l-1 glucose and 10 g l-1 xylose.
  2. a Recalculated