Preservation of microbial communities enriched on lignocellulose under thermophilic and high-solid conditions

Table 4 OTUs that contribute >4 % to Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between T1 and T6 communities

Reactor	Abundance in T1 sample (%)	Abundance in T6 sample (%)	% Contribution to dissimilarity	OTU classification^a
R20	23.59	17.96	9.91	g__Sphingobacteriales
R20	2.62	7.80	9.11	c__Anaerolineae
R20	2.92	7.69	8.40	g__Micromonosporaceae
R20	6.39	2.88	6.17	g__Streptosporangiaceae
R20	2.62	5.55	5.16	g__Roseiflexales (OTU 10)
R20	2.39	0	4.21	g__Balneimonas
R21	22.49	15.08	11.54	g__Sphingobacteriales
R21	0.01	5.94	9.23	g__Roseiflexales (OTU 18)
R21	4.23	9.06	7.52	c__Anaerolineae
R21	2.60	6.93	6.74	g__Micromonosporaceae
R21	6.29	3.27	4.70	g__Sinobacteraceae
R23	24.58	12.68	15.88	g__Sphingobacteriales
R23	5.17	11.02	7.80	c__Anaerolineae
R23	0.67	6.27	7.47	g__Micromonosporaceae
R23	4.17	0.40	5.02	g__Chthoniobacter
R23	6.31	2.64	4.89	g__Streptosporangiaceae
R23	1.21	4.41	4.27	g__Candidatus Solibacter

^aLetter codes indicate the highest resolved taxonomy from phylogenetic binning: k kingdom, p phylum, c class, o order, f family, g genus

ISSN: 2731-3654