Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 OTUs that contribute >4 % to Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between T1 and T6 communities

From: Preservation of microbial communities enriched on lignocellulose under thermophilic and high-solid conditions

Reactor Abundance in T1 sample (%) Abundance in T6 sample (%) % Contribution to dissimilarity OTU classificationa
R20 23.59 17.96 9.91 g__Sphingobacteriales
R20 2.62 7.80 9.11 c__Anaerolineae
R20 2.92 7.69 8.40 g__Micromonosporaceae
R20 6.39 2.88 6.17 g__Streptosporangiaceae
R20 2.62 5.55 5.16 g__Roseiflexales (OTU 10)
R20 2.39 0 4.21 g__Balneimonas
R21 22.49 15.08 11.54 g__Sphingobacteriales
R21 0.01 5.94 9.23 g__Roseiflexales (OTU 18)
R21 4.23 9.06 7.52 c__Anaerolineae
R21 2.60 6.93 6.74 g__Micromonosporaceae
R21 6.29 3.27 4.70 g__Sinobacteraceae
R23 24.58 12.68 15.88 g__Sphingobacteriales
R23 5.17 11.02 7.80 c__Anaerolineae
R23 0.67 6.27 7.47 g__Micromonosporaceae
R23 4.17 0.40 5.02 g__Chthoniobacter
R23 6.31 2.64 4.89 g__Streptosporangiaceae
R23 1.21 4.41 4.27 g__Candidatus Solibacter
  1. aLetter codes indicate the highest resolved taxonomy from phylogenetic binning: k kingdom, p phylum, c class, o order, f family, g genus