Skip to main content

Table 3 Targeted comparison of cell wall compositional profiles for five commercial maize cultivars and their corresponding cell wall mutant counterparts

From: Maize feedstocks with improved digestibility reduce the costs and environmental impacts of biomass pretreatment and saccharification

 

CW

Lig

Cel/CW

Hem/CW

Lig/CW

pCa I

pCa II

FA I

FA II

Di-FA I

Di-FA II

DHS

H

S

G

HYB-010

630

63

583

318

99

26.9

25.0

7.57

10.0

0.04

0.12

0.12

3.7

16.3

12.2

HYB-010-bm3

625

41*,b

555*

377*

66*

17.4*

15.8*

7.57

10.0

0.09*

0.19

0.14*

2.4*

6.9*

9.6

HYB-011

657

64

572

331

97

24.1

22.6

7.20

9.85

0.06

0.17

0.13

3.3

14.1

11.6

HYB-011-bm3

638

46*

560

368*

72*

17.8*

16.7*

7.44

9.58

0.10

0.18

0.13

2.6

6.5*

10.0

HYB-006

682

68

587

312

100

27.1

25.0

8.31

10.70

0.04

0.11

0.11

3.8

15.1

11.5

HYB-006-bm1

690

61

573

340

88

19.7*

17.9*

7.57*

9.73*

0.04

0.11

0.11

2.8*

11.6*

10.2

HYB-009

672

72

590

304

106

29.5

27.3

8.16

10.70

0.04

0.11

0.11

4.2

16.8

12.7

HYB-009-bm1

684

58

563*

353*

85*

17.9*

16.5*

7.43*

9.59*

0.06

0.15

0.12

2.6*

10.7*

10.1*

HYB-014

704

81

594

292

114

32.1

30.0

7.83

10.71

0.01

0.08

0.10

4.8

18.2

15.1

HYB-014-bm1

678

64*

580

326*

94*

23.0*

21.1*

7.52

9.89

0.03

0.08

0.10

3.4*

13.1*

12.4*

F probabilitya

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

***

  1. aSignificance of differences between entries as determined by ANOVA; p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01(**), and p < 0.001(***), NS indicates non-significant differences
  2. bFor any specified stem fiber/cell wall component, “*” denotes a significant difference between an experimental mutant and its corresponding hybrid counterpart according to a Tukey HSD test (P = 0.05)