Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of long-term enzymatic hydrolysis models

From: Development of modified HCH-1 kinetic model for long-term enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis and comparison with literature models

Model

N (Obs)

Parameter

SSE

AICc

Methodology

Modified HCH-1 (16)

112

11

236.7

110.9

Ads

Holtzapple et al. [3] (original HCH-1)

112

4

1630.7

310.5

Ads

Drissen et al. [26]

112

11

600.8

215.2

Ads, M–M

Fan and Lee [27]

112

11

679.7

229.0

Ads

Liao et al. [28]

112

5

1313.7

288.5

Ads

Peri et al. [21]

112

12

2657.6

384.3

Ads, M–M

Fenila and Shastri [5]

112

22

2080.9

385.5

Ads, M–M

Kadam et al. [4]

112

18

2338.6

386.4

Ads, M–M

Gusakov et al. [29]

112

16

2879.2

404.0

M–M

Philippidis et al. [30]

112

7

9139.8

510.4

Ads, M–M

Modified HCH-1 (8)a

56

11

115.2

71.3

Ads

Shen and Agblevor [31]a

56

4

493.8

133.1

Ads

Zhang et al. [32]a

56

3

692.6

149.6

Ads

Rosales-Calderon et al. [33]a

56

3

692.6

149.6

Ads

Nidetzky and Steiner [18]a

56

5

743.9

158.5

Ads

  1. M–M Michaelis–Menten kinetics, Ads adsorption-based approach
  2. aOnly eight reaction conditions were fit [0 g/L initial glucose, four substrate concentrations (40, 60, 80, and 100 g/L) × two enzyme loadings (2 and 5 mg/g)]