Simultaneous lipid production for biodiesel feedstock and decontamination of sago processing wastewater using Candida tropicalis ASY2

Table 2 Comparative evaluations of different industrial wastewaters for the lipid production by oleaginous yeasts

Wastewater type	Oleaginous yeast	Biomass yield (g L^-¹), lipid yield (g L^-¹), lipid content (%)	Lipid productivity (g L⁻¹ day⁻¹), incubation period (days)	Nutrient removal efficiency	References
Monosodium glutamate wastewater	Rhodotorula glutinis	2.44, 0.2, 9.04	0.04, 5	85.51% COD	[28]
Monosodium glutamate wastewater + 15 g L⁻¹ glucose	Rhodotorula glutinis	25, 5, 20	1.67, 3	45% COD	[22]
Fishmeal wastewater	Lipomyces starkeyi HL	5.34, 1.11, 20.80	0.185, 6	81.5% COD	[26]
Fishmeal wastewater + 20 g L⁻¹ glucose	Lipomyces starkeyi HL	17.6, 2.7, 15.3	0.45, 6	43.4% COD	[26]
Palm oil mill effluent	R. glutinis TISTR 5159	4.15, 0.87, 20.97	0.29, 3	40.50% COD	[23]
Palm oil mill effluent (two fold diluted)	Yarrow lipolytica	2.78, 1.69, 61	0.56, 3 + 3 (two phase)	–	[29]
Wastewater after butanol fermentation	Trichosporon dermatis	7.4, 0.99, 13.5	0.2, 5	68% COD	[30]
Pulp and paper industry effluent + 70 g L⁻¹glucose	R. kratochvilovae HIMPA1	13.87, 8.56, 61.71	1.43, 6	77.36% BOD	[31]
Cattle livestock wastewater	Candida pseudolambica	2.19, 0.77, 35.3	–	–	[27]
	Issatchenkia occidentalis	6.54, 1.89, 28.9	–	–	[27]
Sago processing wastewater (SWW)	Candida tropicalis ASY2	2.49, 1.21, 48.59	0.24, 5	83.52% COD; 92.11% BOD; 78.94% cyanide degradation	This study

ISSN: 2731-3654