Skip to main content

Table 5 Opinion ordinal variables (4 Likert scale)

From: Acceptability of genetically engineered algae biofuels in Europe: opinions of experts and stakeholders

Variable name

Answers

Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to established biofuels

Less environmental impact

Totally not agree

Rather not agree

Rather agree

Totally agree

Do not know

Reduced greenhouse gas emissions and climate change

No competition with food

Superior engine performance

New rural jobs

Reduced fuel import dependency

Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to fossil fuels

Less environmental impact

Totally not agree

Rather not agree

Rather agree

Totally agree

Do not know

Reduced greenhouse gas emissions and climate change

Less occupational risk

New rural jobs

Reduced fuel import dependency

Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to natural strains

Improve productivity

Totally not agree

Rather not agree

Rather agree

Totally agree

Do not know

Require less energy

Need less nutrients uptake

Need less use of fresh water

Improve the controllability of the process

Improve economic feasibility

GMOs should partially replace fossil fuels

Totally not agree

Rather not agree

Rather agree

Totally agree

Do not know

General risk perception of fuels/power sources

Fossil fuels

Entirely harmless

Rather harmless

Rather alarming

Entirely alarming

Prefer not to answer

Established biofuels

GE algae biofuel

Solar photovoltaic power

Wind power

Hydropower

Perceptions of social acceptance of GE algae biofuel

Opinion about general social acceptance

No acceptance

Low

Medium

High acceptance

Prefer not to answer

Variation of public acceptance in case of using gene-editing techniques

Lower

No difference

Slightly higher

Noticeably higher

Do not know

Opinion about regulating gene-edited organisms as GMOs

Totally not agree

Rather not agree

Rather agree

Totally agree

Prefer not to answer