Sociodemographic ordinal variables | Opinion ordinal variables | Spearman’s rank order coefficient | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Age | Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to established biofuels | ||
Less environmental impact | − 0.17 | 0.025 | |
Reduced GHG emissions and climate change | − 0.19 | 0.023 | |
No competition with food | − 0.02 | 0.915 | |
Superior engine performance | − 0.09 | 0.268 | |
New rural jobs | − 0.13 | 0.389 | |
Reduced fuel import dependency | 0.03 | 0.637 | |
Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to fossil fuels | |||
Less environmental impact | − 0.05 | 0.345 | |
Reduced GHG emissions and climate change | − 0.05 | 0.391 | |
Less occupational risk | − 0.25 | 0.326 | |
New rural jobs | − 0.06 | 0.807 | |
Reduced fuel import dependency | − 0.02 | 0.949 | |
Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to natural strains | |||
Improve productivity | − 0.23 | 0.148 | |
Require less energy | − 0.23 | 0.109 | |
Need less nutrients uptake | − 0.18 | 0.326 | |
Need less use of fresh water | − 0.08 | 0.902 | |
Improve the controllability of the process | − 0.2 | 0.355 | |
Improve economic feasibility | − 0.19 | 0.554 | |
GMOs should partially replace fossil fuels | − 0.02 | 0.255 | |
Perceptions of social acceptance of GE algae biofuel | |||
Opinion about general social acceptance | − 0.15 | 0.167 | |
Variation of public acceptance in case of using gene-editing techniques | − 0.04 | 0.662 | |
Opinion about regulating gene-edited organisms as GMOs | 0.09 | 0.665 | |
General risk perception of fuels/power sources | |||
Fossil fuels | 0.06 | 0.528 | |
Established biofuels | 0.01 | 0.858 | |
GE algae biofuel | 0.06 | 0.972 | |
Solar photovoltaic power | 0.06 | 0.851 | |
Wind power | 0.07 | 0.907 | |
Hydropower | − 0.02 | 0.897 | |
Educational level | Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to established biofuels | ||
Less environmental impact | 0.02 | 0.044 | |
Reduced GHG emissions and climate change | − 0.03 | 0.001 | |
No competition with food | 0.12 | 0.058 | |
Superior engine performance | − 0.04 | 0.314 | |
New rural jobs | 0.06 | 0.040 | |
Reduced fuel import dependency | − 0.02 | 0.126 | |
Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to fossil fuels | |||
Less environmental impact | 0.04 | 0.158 | |
Reduced GHG emissions and climate change | − 0.06 | 0.085 | |
Less occupational risk | − 0.08 | 0.619 | |
New rural jobs | 0.02 | 0.068 | |
Reduced fuel import dependency | − 0.13 | 0.071 | |
Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to natural strains | |||
Improve productivity | 0.01 | 0.598 | |
Require less energy | − 0.03 | 0.021 | |
Need less nutrients uptake | 0.06 | 0.696 | |
Need less use of fresh water | 0.03 | 0.860 | |
Improve the controllability of the process | − 0.06 | 0.321 | |
Improve economic feasibility | − 0.05 | 0.313 | |
GMOs should partially replace fossil fuels | − 0.02 | 0.420 | |
Perceptions of social acceptance of GE algae biofuel | |||
Opinion about general social acceptance | − 0.09 | 0.927 | |
Variation of public acceptance in case of using gene-editing techniques | 0.04 | 0.776 | |
Opinion about regulating gene-edited organisms as GMOs | 0.06 | 0.216 | |
General risk perception of fuels/power sources | |||
Fossil fuels | − 0.08 | 0.933 | |
Established biofuels | 0.05 | 0.740 | |
GE algae biofuel | − 0.07 | 0.335 | |
Solar photovoltaic power | 0.04 | 0.637 | |
Wind power | − 0.15 | 0.780 | |
Hydropower | − 0.16 | 0.086 | |
Experience in algae industry | Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to established biofuels | ||
Less environmental impact | 0 | 0.927 | |
Reduced GHG emissions and climate change | − 0.11 | 0.659 | |
No competition with food | 0.01 | 0.397 | |
Superior engine performance | − 0.01 | 0.624 | |
New rural jobs | − 0.06 | 0.828 | |
Reduced fuel import dependency | 0.03 | 0.727 | |
Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to fossil fuels | |||
Less environmental impact | − 0.11 | 0.560 | |
Reduced GHG emissions and climate change | − 0.11 | 0.822 | |
Less occupational risk | 0.04 | 0.928 | |
New rural jobs | − 0.01 | 0.989 | |
Reduced fuel import dependency | − 0.02 | 0.977 | |
Expected benefits of GE algae biofuel compared to natural strains | |||
Improve productivity | − 0.06 | 0.416 | |
Require less energy | 0.03 | 0.488 | |
Need less nutrients uptake | − 0.04 | 0.256 | |
Need less use of fresh water | 0.08 | 0.107 | |
Improve the controllability of the process | − 0.06 | 0.953 | |
Improve economic feasibility | − 0.15 | 0.174 | |
GMOs should partially replace fossil fuels | 0.04 | 0.366 | |
Perceptions of social acceptance of GE algae biofuel | |||
Opinion about general social acceptance | 0 | 0.657 | |
Variation of public acceptance in case of using gene-editing techniques | 0.02 | 0.666 | |
Opinion about regulating gene-edited organisms as GMOs | − 0.02 | 0.410 | |
General risk perception of fuels/power sources | |||
Fossil fuels | − 0.09 | 0.450 | |
Established biofuels | − 0.02 | 0.951 | |
GE algae biofuel | − 0.02 | 0.784 | |
Solar photovoltaic power | − 0.02 | 0.714 | |
Wind power | − 0.03 | 0.808 | |
Hydropower | − 0.06 | 0.835 |