Table 3 Final comparison of methods
From: Innovations in anaerobic digestion: a model-based study
Biogas [Nm\(^\mathbf{3 }\)/d] | Methane [%] | Biogas [Nm\(^\mathbf{3 }\)/d] | Methane [%] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case 1 (51.61% MS, 48.39% W) | Case 2 (52.38% MS, 47.62% W) | |||||
Initial | 11,916.36 | 55.36 | 12,052.70 | 55.34 | ||
Change | AHPD TPAD | -6.58 [%] 9.08 [%] | 7.35 [%]-8.28 [%] | AHPDTPAD | -6.14 [%]9.06 [%] | 7.30 [%]-8.27 [%] |
Case 3 (50.82% MS, 49.18% PM) | Case 4 (51.61% MS, 48.39% PM) | |||||
Initial | 11,786.09 | 56.42 | 11,908.66 | 56.36 | ||
Change | AHPD TPAD | -7.97 [%]9.59 [%] | 8.50 [%]-8.66 [%] | AHPDTPAD | -7.59 [%]9.55 [%] | 8.42 [%]-8.63 [%] |