From: Direct interspecies electron transfer mechanisms of a biochar-amended anaerobic digestion: a review
Coculture | Culture medium | Manifestations of DIET | Refs. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
e-donor | e-acceptor | |||
G. metallireducens | G. sulfurreducens | • Ethanol and fumarate • With BC | • Ethanol was metabolized and fumarate was reduced to succinate on day 2 • Cells were attached to BC but did not aggregate | [123] |
• Without BC | • Ethanol metabolism started at day 30 | |||
• Ethanol and fumarate • With carbon cloth | • There was a syntrophic metabolism of ethanol and a reduction of fumarate to succinate on day 2 • Higher metabolism when the carbon cloth was doubled • Acetate did not accumulate • Cells were dispersed | [192] | ||
• With cotton cloth | • No ethanol oxidation and succinate production due to the very low conductivity of the carbon cloth | [192] | ||
G. metallireducens | None | • With BC | • Ethanol metabolized slowly with an increase in acetate • BC served as an electron acceptor | [123] |
• Without BC | • No ethanol metabolism | |||
M. barkeri | None | • Pure culture | • Not ethanol metabolism | |
G. metallireducens | M. barkeri | • Ethanol | • Ethanol was converted to methane • Transient accumulation of acetate • Microorganisms were attached to BC but did not aggregate • BC served as an electrical conductor between the two species and not through cell-to-cell electron transfer | [123] |
• Without BC | • Not ethanol metabolism | |||
• Ethanol as the sole electron donor | • Ethanol metabolized to methane on day 7 • Transient accumulation of acetate • Formation of intertwined aggregates (100–200 μm) that shared electrons via DIET • M. Barkeri was able to participate in DIET | [186] | ||
• Pure culture | • No metabolism of ethanol and no acetate formed | [186] | ||
• No GAC | • Ethanol started to metabolize after 39 days | [186] | ||
G. metallireducens wild-type | G. sulfurreducens is incapable of producing pili | • Carbon cloth | • The succinate produced is comparable to the coculture initiated with wild-type strains • Cells were tightly attached to carbon cloth at day 10 of incubation • This indicates that the removal of pili did not inhibit the attachment of cells | [192] |
G. metallireducens is incapable of producing pili | G. sulfurreducens wild-type | • Carbon cloth | ||
G. metallireducens wild-type | G. sulfurreducens Omcs deficient | • Carbon cloth | • There was succinate production | [192] |
G. sulfurreducens | None | • Ethanol & fumarate • With carbon | • No ethanol metabolism or fumarate reduction even with carbon cloth | [192] |
G. metallireducens | None | Â | ||
Desulfovibrio vulgaris | G. sulfurreducens | • Ethanol • With carbon cloth | • The cloth did not accelerate metabolism | [192] |
G. metallireducens | M. barkeri strain | • Ethanol | • Cocultures without cloth required metabolized ethanol at day 40 • Cocultures with carbon cloth started to metabolize ethanol began at day 10 • Cells were not closely associated with each other | [192] |
pilA-deficient or Gmet 18668 gene deficient strain G. Metallireducnes | M. Barkeri | • No GAC | • Did not metabolize ethanol and no methane was produced | [186] |
• With GAC | • The amendment of GAC in the coculture allowed the pili-deficient strain G. Metallireducens to transfer an electron to M. Barkeri resulting in the production of methane • Proof that GAC can serve as a substitute for pili to shuttle electrons |  | ||
P. carbinolicus | M. barkeri | • Ethanol | • There was growth in the coculture • A steady accumulation of acetate was observed • No multispecies aggregates formed illustrating that DIET requires cell-to-cell for electron transfer • M. Barkeri, using H2, metabolized a little of the acetate produced by P. Carbinolicus • M. Barkeri is the first methanogen known to use both H2 and or electrons from DIET to reduce CO2 | [186] |
P. carbinolicus | G. sulfurreducens | – | • No aggregate formed, suggesting that close physical contact was not necessary for interspecies H2 transfer | [186] |