Open Access

Carbon catabolite repression in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum

  • Vasiliki Tsakraklides1,
  • A Joe Shaw1,
  • Bethany B Miller1,
  • David A Hogsett1 and
  • Christopher D Herring1Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels20125:85

https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-85

Received: 31 July 2012

Accepted: 25 October 2012

Published: 26 November 2012

Abstract

Background

The thermophilic anaerobe Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum is capable of directly fermenting xylan and the biomass-derived sugars glucose, cellobiose, xylose, mannose, galactose and arabinose. It has been metabolically engineered and developed as a biocatalyst for the production of ethanol.

Results

We report the initial characterization of the carbon catabolite repression system in this organism. We find that sugar metabolism in T. saccharolyticum is regulated by histidine-containing protein HPr. We describe a mutation in HPr, His15Asp, that leads to derepression of less-favored carbon source utilization.

Conclusion

Co-utilization of sugars can be achieved by mutation of HPr in T. saccharolyticum. Further manipulation of CCR in this organism will be instrumental in achieving complete and rapid conversion of all available sugars to ethanol.

Keywords

Catabolite repression Arabinose Glucose HPr Deoxyglucose Lignocellulose Ethanol Thermophile Anaerobe

Background

Metabolic yield is one of the most important factors in determining economic feasibility for biological-based conversion of biomass to fuels and chemicals. Most bacteria have evolved tailored carbon utilization pathways and regulatory schemes for the uptake and catabolism of carbon sources in their environment. The order in which sugars are utilized is frequently determined by a mechanism known as carbon catabolite repression (CCR) [1]. CCR ensures that the cell’s energy expenditure on sugar import and metabolism will be directed to the carbon source that is most easily accessible and allows for fastest growth [2, 3].

The firmicutes are low G+C, gram-positive bacteria and include potential biofuel-producing species from the classes Clostridia and Bacilli. Studies of CCR in firmicutes have revealed the importance of the Histidine-containing Protein HPr [35]. HPr(His15-P) donates a phosphate to glucose imported via the phosphotransferase system (PTS). Histidine-dephosphorylated HPr is then phosphorylated by HPr kinase (HPrK) at Ser46 [68] and this form of the protein mediates repression in concert with the transcriptional regulator Catabolite Control Protein A (CcpA) [9]. In most firmicutes, His15 and Ser46 phosphorylation of HPr are mutually antagonistic [10, 11]. Under conditions of nutrient limitation, HPrK acts as a phosphorylase, removing the serine phosphate of HPr and inhibiting CcpA-mediated gene regulation [8]. A doubly phosphorylated form of HPr has been detected in Bacillus subtilis under certain growth conditions; this form of the protein was absent or significantly reduced when strong CCR was induced [12]. Some firmicutes additionally produce Crh (catabolite repression HPr), a protein homologous to HPr but lacking the His15 residue. Crh is involved in CcpA-dependent CCR but plays no role in PTS function [13]. In Escherichia coli and other gram-negative enteric bacteria reviewed in [3, 14], transcriptional regulation of catabolic genes is mediated by the phosphorylation state of the PTS EIIAGlc subunit and cAMP concentration, not HPr [15, 16].

We studied CCR in the firmicute Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum, which consumes xylan and other biomass-derived sugars to produce ethanol and a mixture of organic acids [17]. Metabolic engineering has redirected carbon flux almost exclusively to ethanol [18]. In order to develop this organism into an even more efficient biocatalyst, we sought to understand and effectively manipulate its carbon source utilization. T. saccharolyticum can grow on a wide spectrum of sugars, and although it can co-utilize glucose and xylose, it exhibits carbon source preferences when cultured in other sugar mixtures. The molecular basis for these preferences is unknown. A study of the glycobiome of the related Thermoanaerobacter sp. X514 revealed that glucose and xylose utilization can occur in parallel and are both regulated by transcriptional antiterminators of the BglG family. Hexose and pentose co-utilization was interpreted as absence of CCR in that organism [19]. In the present study, we demonstrate the presence of CCR in T. saccharolyticum. We identify homologs to all major CCR genes and find that in T. saccharolyticum, CCR is mediated by HPr phosphorylation. We characterize a mutant of HPr that provides relief from CCR and we discuss the possible mechanism by which the mutation leads to the observed growth characteristics.

Results

cAMP-independent CCR in T. saccharolyticum

M2476, the parent strain used in this study, was derived from the ethanologen strain M1442 [20] by deletion of the perR gene. Deletion of perR upregulates the oxidative stress response and improves oxygen tolerance [21] but is not expected to influence CCR. The non-metabolizable glucose analog 2-deoxyglucose has been used extensively to induce catabolite repression in bacteria [2227]. When utilization of the sole carbon source in the medium is repressed, growth is inhibited and CCR can be detected by monitoring the culture optical density [23]. We added 2-deoxyglucose to microwell cultures containing a single sugar as the main carbon source. 2-deoxyglucose delayed growth in cellobiose (Figure 1B) but not glucose cultures (Figure 1A), indicating that 2-deoxyglucose led to CCR of cellobiose utilization. Exogenous addition of cAMP provides CCR relief in E. coli[28, 29]. 5 mM cAMP had no effect on the growth delay caused by 2-deoxyglucose (Figure 1C) suggesting that in T. saccharolyticum, 2-deoxyglucose-induced CCR is cAMP-independent.
Figure 1

cAMP-independent CCR by 2-deoxyglucose. (A) and (B): Increasing amounts of 2-deoxyglucose were added to T. saccharolyticum M2476 cultures supplemented with 5 g/L glucose or cellobiose (black = 5 mg/L; green = 50 mg/L; blue = 0.5 g/L; red = 5 g/L 2-deoxyglucose). (C): cAMP and 2-deoxyglucose were added to T. saccharolyticum M2476 cultures supplemented with 5 g/L cellobiose (solid black = no additions; dashed black = 5 mM cAMP; solid red = 5 g/L 2-deoxyglucose; dashed red = 5 mM cAMP and 5 g/L 2-deoxyglucose).

T. saccharolyticum CCR is mediated by HPr

A BLAST search of the T. saccharolyticum genome with B. subtilis CCR genes showed significant matches for HPr (E-value: 3 × 10-17), HPrK (1 × 10-85), Crh (9 × 10-24) and CcpA (16 matches with E-values: 3x10-19-1 × 10-85) suggesting that T. saccharolyticum uses the same elements of CCR as B. subtilis. To study the role of HPr in T. saccharolyticum CCR, we replaced the endogenous HPr gene in strain M2476 with a modified copy encoding the histidine phosphomimetic HPr His15Asp to create strain M2907. We reasoned that if HPr mediates PTS import and CCR, the mutant strain would be compromised for PTS sugar import and exhibit resistance to CCR. We evaluated growth of strains M2476 and M2907 on glucose, xylose, mannose, galactose, arabinose or cellobiose as the primary carbon source. Growth of the mutant strain M2907 in all sugars tested (Figure 2, dashed black lines) indicates that these sugars can be imported independently of HPr as a PTS phosphate donor. M2907 grew more slowly than M2476 on glucose, mannose and cellobiose, likely due to reduced PTS function in the mutant strain. M2907 grew faster than its parent on xylose, galactose, arabinose and cellobiose in the presence of 2-deoxyglucose (Figure 2, red lines) suggesting that CCR of these sugars is relieved by the HPr His15Asp mutation. While other ethanologen strains of T. saccharolyticum grow well on galactose, M2476 does not, which was confirmed in bottle cultures. The HPr His15Asp mutation slightly improved growth in galactose.
Figure 2

T . saccharolyticum CCR is relieved by HPr His15Asp. Cultures of strains M2476 (HPr, solid lines) and M2907 (HPr His15Asp, dashed lines) supplemented with the indicated sugars were grown in the absence (black lines) or presence (red lines) of 5 g/L 2-deoxyglucose.

HPr His15Asp leads to altered order of sugar utilization

We next examined the effect of the HPr His15Asp mutation on sugar utilization in a mixture of sugars. Experiments were carried out in anaerobic bottles (data not shown) and fermentors (Figure 3) with similar results. When arabinose was the primary carbon source, M2476 and M2907 consumed arabinose at a similar rate and depleted it from the medium by 20 hours (Figure 3A). In a mixture of glucose and arabinose, M2476 preferentially consumed glucose within the first 20 hours and had only consumed 50% of the arabinose by 60 hours (Figure 3B, filled symbols). The M2907 mutant showed complete reversal of sugar preference: arabinose was utilized at the same rate as when it was supplied alone and glucose was only partially utilized by 60 hours (Figure 3B, open symbols). A strain carrying mutations in HPr at positions 45 and 46 was unable to grow on arabinose (Additional file 1).
Figure 3

HPr His15Asp mutation enables arabinose utilization in the presence of glucose. The level of glucose (triangles) and arabinose (squares) remaining in the culture medium was determined for cultures of T. saccharolyticum strains M2476 (HPr, filled symbols) and M2907 (HPr His15Asp, open symbols) supplemented with (A) arabinose or (B) arabinose and glucose.

When the same strains were grown in a mixture of glucose, arabinose, galactose, mannose and xylose, M2907 again demonstrated an altered sugar utilization profile (Figure 4). Galactose and arabinose consumption was clearly derepressed and was complete by 60 hours. Glucose utilization was significantly slower in the mutant (Figure 4A) in agreement with the previous experiment (Figure 3B). Mannose and xylose utilization presented a more complex phenotype. Both these sugars were consumed in the presence of glucose by the wild-type strain (Figure 4B). Consumption of mannose was largely inhibited in strain M2907. In contrast, xylose was consumed to completion at a rate similar to that for arabinose and galactose.
Figure 4

HPr His15Asp mutation alters the order of sugar utilization. The level of sugar remaining in the culture medium was determined for cultures of T. saccharolyticum strains (A) M2476 and (B) M2907 supplemented with glucose, arabinose, xylose, galactose and mannose, as indicated.

Discussion

The ability of T. saccharolyticum to ferment biomass-derived sugars at elevated temperature renders it an attractive biocatalyst for the production of fuels and renewable chemicals. We investigated carbon catabolite repression in this organism to better understand sugar utilization and how to manipulate it. Sequence homology and our experimental data indicate that T. saccharolyticum CCR is regulated by HPr in a mechanism similar to that of the model organism B. subtilis. We have identified orthologues to all the major elements in the B. subtilis pathway: HPr, HPrK, Crh and CcpA. HPr-mediated CCR is emerging as a shared feature of the firmicute phylum with evidence of its presence in all firmicutes studied to date [3].

In our experiments, the HPr His15Asp mutation led to relief of 2-deoxyglucose-induced repression for multiple sugars and allowed for arabinose and galactose utilization in the presence of glucose. We speculate that HPr His15Asp leads to CCR relief through lowering glucose/2-deoxyglucose import and preventing CcpA activation. Lack of a donor phosphate to transfer from HPr(His-P) to the PTS EIIAGlc subunit is expected to lead to reduced PTS function and therefore limit any downstream repressive effects of glucose import. In Listeria monocytogenes, a His15Ala or His15Asp HPr mutation leads to reduction of HPr PTS activity by more than 96% [30]. Consistent with this result, M2907 grew more slowly on glucose (Figure 2) and consumed glucose at a slower rate (Figures 3 and 4). Reduced glucose import may therefore be responsible for CCR relief in the histidine-substituted HPr mutant strain. HPr His15Asp may also provide relief from CCR by directly preventing CcpA activity. The antagonistic relationship of Ser46 and His15 phosphorylation opens the possibility that the histidine phosphomimetic mutant blocks serine phosphorylation of HPr [11] and therefore prevents activation of CcpA by HPr(Ser-P). In vitro evidence has shown that Streptococcus salivarius and L. monocytogenes HPr(His15-P) or its phosphomimetic variant HPr(His15Asp) can be phosphorylated at the serine position [30, 31] and a doubly phosphorylated form of HPr has been detected in B. subtilis[12]. However, the level of doubly phosphorylated HPr is reduced under CCR [12] and doubly phosphorylated HPr does not bind CcpA [32, 33]. This is likely because unphosphorylated His15 contributes to HPr-CcpA binding directly and phosphorylation at His15 blocks CcpA activation by disrupting this interaction [32]. The phosphomimetic mutant HPr His15Asp reported here is therefore expected to disrupt HPr-CcpA interaction and block downstream CcpA-mediated repression. Whether by controlling intracellular concentration of the catabolite repressor or the activity of CcpA, HPr is clearly a major regulator of CCR in T. saccharolyticum.

Growth of the mutant strain in all sugars tested suggests that phosphate transfer from HPr(His-P) is not essential in the metabolism of glucose, xylose, mannose, galactose, arabinose and cellobiose. The T. saccharolyticum genome annotation predicts that arabinose and xylose are likely transported by ABC-type transporters rather than the PTS. We have identified putative orthologues of GlcU and GlkA, a glucose importer and glucokinase [3437], as candidates for non-PTS glucose transport.

Although growth on mannose and xylose was repressible by 2-deoxyglucose (Figure 2), both these sugars were consumed by the wild-type T. saccharolyticum strain inoculated in medium containing glucose (Figure 4B), suggesting that glucose affects the utilization of these sugars to a lesser extent. Whereas the non-metabolizable 2-deoxyglucose effectively shuts down their metabolism, glucose is a consumable repressor and its intracellular concentration may be lower. Alternatively, cells actively growing on glucose may contain metabolic intermediates that lessen CCR of xylose and mannose. Supporting this, consumption of xylose and mannose quickly followed after an initial reduction of glucose in the medium, followed by significant overlap in utilization of all three sugars. In the HPr His15Asp strain, xylose was completely consumed at a slower rate than in the wild-type strain but at a similar rate to arabinose and cellobiose. Mannose utilization was very poor in the HPr His15Asp strain, suggesting that it is likely transported by the same or similar PTS components as for glucose. The data show three groups of sugars with similar CCR and utilization profiles: 1) glucose and mannose - both dependent on phosphoryl transfer at His15 of HPr; 2) xylose – affected to some degree by CCR but partly independent; and 3) arabinose and galactose – both apparently utilized best when HPr / PTS function is blocked.

HPr has also been implicated in pathway-specific activation or repression. Lactobacillus brevis HPr(Ser-P) inactivates lactose and galactose permease [38, 39]. Reduced serine phosphorylation due to a phosphomimetic histidine mutation is therefore expected to relieve repression of these sugars. In Streptococcus thermophilus, HPr(His-P) is required for activation of lactose transport through activating phosphorylation of the lactose permease [40]. When glucose is present and imported by the PTS, phosphate is diverted to glucose preventing activation of lactose import. As the HPr His15Asp mutant is unable to donate a phosphate, any such sugar import pathways requiring phosphate transfer from HPr(His-P) will remain inactive. Study of HPr interactions with sugar permeases is required to establish whether it plays such sugar-specific roles in T. saccharolyticum.

Although derepressed for arabinose and galactose utilization in the presence of glucose, the HPr His15Asp strain was not able to co-utilize all five sugars present in biomass efficiently because of a detrimental effect of the HPr mutation on glucose and mannose utilization. It should be possible to overcome this limitation by selection for spontaneous glucose and mannose utilizing isolates [41]. Alternatively, expression of heterologous high-capacity transporters or manipulation of native transporters may serve to decouple preferred-sugar transport and CCR.

Conclusions

Preferential utilization of carbon sources offers a selective advantage in nature where bacteria compete for resources [2, 3] but hinders industrial applications where metabolic yield and productivity determine economic feasibility. Understanding the components and effectors of CCR is critical to the development of biocatalysts with expanded carbon source utilization profiles [42]. In the present study, we have begun to characterize the molecular basis of CCR in T. saccharolyticum. We found that T. saccharolyticum CCR is mediated by HPr and used our findings to construct a CCR derepressed strain. Further study and manipulation of T. saccharolyticum CCR should enable the engineering of strains that co-utilize mixed sugars to achieve increased metabolic yield and wider feedstock utilization.

Methods

Strains and media

M2476, the parent strain used in this study, was derived from the ethanologen strain M1442 [20] by deletion of the perR gene (Tsac_2491 in T. saccharolyticum genome [GenBank: CP003184]) using previously described methods [4345]. We replaced the endogenous HPr gene in strain M2476 with a modified copy encoding the HPr His15Asp mutant using a previously described method for genomic integration [44] to create strain M2907. All growth experiments were conducted in TSC7 medium (per liter: 8.5 g yeast extract, 1 g trisodium citrate*2H2O, 1 g KH2PO4, 2 g MgSO4*7H2O, 1.85 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.2 g CaCl2*2H2O, 0.2 g FeSO4*7H2O, 0.12 g Methionine, 0.5 g L-Cysteine HCl, pH 5.8) supplemented with the sugars indicated in the text at 55°C under anaerobic conditions. Although T. saccharolyticum can utilize yeast extract as a carbon source, the amount contained in TSC7 is not sufficient to attain the optical densities observed in these assays without the addition of a sugar carbon source.

2-deoxyglucose-induced repression assays

For 2-deoxyglucose titration, a range of 0.005 – 5.0 g/L 2-deoxyglucose and 5 mM cAMP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were added as indicated to T. saccharolyticum microwell cultures supplemented with 5 g/L glucose or cellobiose, inoculated with 10% v/v of an exponentially growing culture in the same medium (one of three replicate experiments is presented in Figure 1). To determine the effect of HPr His15Asp mutation on 2-deoxyglucose-induced CCR, microwell cultures supplemented with 10 g/L glucose, xylose, mannose, galactose, arabinose or cellobiose were inoculated with 10% v/v exponentially growing culture of M2476 or M2907 (one of two replicates is shown in Figure 2). Growth curves were obtained by measuring absorbance at 600 nm in a BioTek PowerWaveXS plate reader with intermittent agitation, inside a COY laboratories anaerobic chamber with a nominal atmosphere of 85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% H2.

Sugar co-utilization tests

Experiments were carried out in anaerobic bottles (data not shown) and fermentors (Figure 3) with similar results. Sartorius Biostat Aplus fermentors at 1 liter working volume were sparged with 95% N2, 5% CO2 gas prior to inoculation with 5% v/v overnight culture grown in the same medium. Agitation was at 150 rpm and the pH was maintained at 5.8 with NH4OH. Sugars in the culture medium were analyzed by HPLC using a BioRad Aminex HPX-87P column and a refractive index detector. For the two-sugar fermentations, glucose, arabinose or both sugars were added to a final concentration of 20 g/L each in TSC7 medium. For the five-sugar fermentations, glucose, arabinose, galactose, mannose and xylose were added to a final concentration of 10 g/L each in TSC7 medium.

Abbreviations

Asp: 

Aspartate

BLAST: 

Basic local alignment search tool

cAMP: 

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate

CcpA: 

Catabolite control protein A

CCR: 

Carbon catabolite repression

Crh: 

Catabolite repression HPr

His: 

Histidine

HPr: 

Histidine-containing protein

HPrK: 

HPr kinase

PTS: 

Phosphotransferase system

Ser: 

Serine.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Hans van Dijken for useful comments. This work was supported by Mascoma Corporation and the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FC36-07G017057. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Mascoma Corporation

References

  1. Magasanik B: Catabolite repression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1961, 26: 249-256. 10.1101/SQB.1961.026.01.031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brückner R, Titgemeyer F: Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: choice of the carbon source and autoregulatory limitation of sugar utilization. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002, 209: 141-148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gorke B, Stulke J: Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008, 6: 613-624. 10.1038/nrmicro1932View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Fujita Y: Carbon catabolite control of the metabolic network in Bacillus subtilis . Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2009, 73: 245-259. 10.1271/bbb.80479View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Warner JB, Lolkema JS: CcpA-dependent carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003, 67: 475-490. 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.475-490.2003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Galinier A, Kravanja M, Engelmann R, Hengstenberg W, Kilhoffer MC, Deutscher J, Haiech J: New protein kinase and protein phosphatase families mediate signal transduction in bacterial catabolite repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95: 1823-1828. 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1823View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Reizer J, Hoischen C, Titgemeyer F, Rivolta C, Rabus R, Stulke J, Karamata D, Saier MH Jr, Hillen W: A novel protein kinase that controls carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Mol Microbiol 1998, 27: 1157-1169. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00747.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mijakovic I, Poncet S, Galinier A, Monedero V, Fieulaine S, Janin J, Nessler S, Marquez JA, Scheffzek K, Hasenbein S, et al.: Pyrophosphate-producing protein dephosphorylation by HPr kinase/phosphorylase: a relic of early life? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99: 13442-13447. 10.1073/pnas.212410399View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Henkin TM: The role of CcpA transcriptional regulator in carbon metabolism in Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996, 135: 9-15. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb07959.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Deutscher J, Kessler U, Alpert CA, Hengstenberg W: Bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system: P-Ser-HPr and its possible regulatory function? Biochemistry 1984, 23: 4455-4460. 10.1021/bi00314a033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Reizer J, Novotny MJ, Hengstenberg W, Saier MH Jr: Properties of ATP-dependent protein kinase from Streptococcus pyogenes that phosphorylates a seryl residue in HPr, a phosphocarrier protein of the phosphotransferase system. J Bacteriol 1984, 160: 333-340.Google Scholar
  12. Singh KD, Schmalisch MH, Stulke J, Gorke B: Carbon catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis: quantitative analysis of repression exerted by different carbon sources. J Bacteriol 2008, 190: 7275-7284. 10.1128/JB.00848-08View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Galinier A, Haiech J, Kilhoffer MC, Jaquinod M, Stulke J, Deutscher J, Martin-Verstraete I: The Bacillus subtilis crh gene encodes a HPr-like protein involved in carbon catabolite repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94: 8439-8444. 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8439View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma PW: How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006, 70: 939-1031. 10.1128/MMBR.00024-06View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolb A, Busby S, Buc H, Garges S, Adhya S: Transcriptional regulation by cAMP and its receptor protein. Annu Rev Biochem 1993, 62: 749-795. 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.003533View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Malan TP, Kolb A, Buc H, McClure WR: Mechanism of CRP-cAMP activation of lac operon transcription initiation activation of the P1 promoter. J Mol Biol 1984, 180: 881-909. 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90262-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shaw AJ, Jenney FE Jr, Adams MWW, Lynd LR: End-product pathways in the xylose fermenting bacterium, thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum . Enzyme Microb Technol 2008, 42: 453-458. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.01.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Shaw AJ, Podkaminer KK, Desai SG, Bardsley JS, Rogers SR, Thorne PG, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR: Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105: 13769-13774. 10.1073/pnas.0801266105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin L, Song H, Tu Q, Qin Y, Zhou A, Liu W, He Z, Zhou J, Xu J: The thermoanaerobacter glycobiome reveals mechanisms of pentose and hexose co-utilization in bacteria. PLoS Genet 2011, 7: e1002318. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002318View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee JM, Venditti RA, Jameel H, Kenealy WR: Detoxification of woody hydrolyzates with activated carbon for bioconversion to ethanol by the thermophilic anaerobic bacterium Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum . Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35: 626-636. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.10.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hillmann F, Doring C, Riebe O, Ehrenreich A, Fischer RJ, Bahl H: The role of PerR in O2-affected gene expression of Clostridium acetobutylicum . J Bacteriol 2009, 191: 6082-6093. 10.1128/JB.00351-09View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hyun HH, Zeikus JG: Regulation and genetic enhancement of glucoamylase and pullulanase production in Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum . J Bacteriol 1985, 164: 1146-1152.Google Scholar
  23. Hyun HH, Zeikus JG: Regulation and genetic enhancement of beta-amylase production in Clostridium thermosulfurogenes . J Bacteriol 1985, 164: 1162-1170.Google Scholar
  24. Annous BA, Blaschek HP: Isolation and characterization of Clostridium acetobutylicum mutants with enhanced amylolytic activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991, 57: 2544-2548.Google Scholar
  25. Kornberg H, Lambourne LT: The role of phosphoenolpyruvate in the simultaneous uptake of fructose and 2-deoxyglucose by Escherichia coli . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994, 91: 11080-11083. 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11080View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Scholte BJ, Postma PW: Competition between two pathways for sugar uptake by the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system in Salmonella typhimurium . Eur J Biochem 1981, 114: 51-58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ye JJ, Saier MH Jr: Regulation of sugar uptake via the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems in Bacillus subtilis and Lactococcus lactis is mediated by ATP-dependent phosphorylation of seryl residue 46 in HPr. J Bacteriol 1996, 178: 3557-3563.Google Scholar
  28. Ullmann A, Monod J: Cyclic AMP as an antagonist of catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett 1968, 2: 57-60. 10.1016/0014-5793(68)80100-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Isaacs H Jr, Chao D, Yanofsky C, Saier MH Jr: Mechanism of catabolite repression of tryptophanase synthesis in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 1994,140(Pt 8):2125-2134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Christensen DP, Benson AK, Hutkins RW: Mutational analysis of the role of HPr in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999, 65: 2112-2115.Google Scholar
  31. Casabon I, Couture M, Vaillancourt K, Vadeboncoeur C: Kinetic studies of HPr, HPr(H15D), HPr(H15E), and HPr(His approximately P) phosphorylation by the Streptococcus salivarius HPr(Ser) kinase/phosphorylase. Biochemistry 2009, 48: 10765-10774. 10.1021/bi901512bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Deutscher J, Kuster E, Bergstedt U, Charrier V, Hillen W: Protein kinase-dependent HPr/CcpA interaction links glycolytic activity to carbon catabolite repression in gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 1995, 15: 1049-1053. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02280.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Reizer J, Bergstedt U, Galinier A, Kuster E, Saier MH Jr, Hillen W, Steinmetz M, Deutscher J: Catabolite repression resistance of gnt operon expression in Bacillus subtilis conferred by mutation of His-15, the site of phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphorylation of the phosphocarrier protein HPr. J Bacteriol 1996, 178: 5480-5486.Google Scholar
  34. Jankovic I, Bruckner R: Carbon catabolite repression by the catabolite control protein CcpA in Staphylococcus xylosus . J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2002, 4: 309-314.Google Scholar
  35. Jankovic I, Egeter O, Bruckner R: Analysis of catabolite control protein A-dependent repression in Staphylococcus xylosus by a genomic reporter gene system. J Bacteriol 2001, 183: 580-586. 10.1128/JB.183.2.580-586.2001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Fiegler H, Bassias J, Jankovic I, Bruckner R: Identification of a gene in Staphylococcus xylosus encoding a novel glucose uptake protein. J Bacteriol 1999, 181: 4929-4936.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner E, Marcandier S, Egeter O, Deutscher J, Gotz F, Bruckner R: Glucose kinase-dependent catabolite repression in Staphylococcus xylosus . J Bacteriol 1995, 177: 6144-6152.Google Scholar
  38. Ye JJ, Reizer J, Cui X, Saier MH Jr: ATP-dependent phosphorylation of serine-46 in the phosphocarrier protein HPr regulates lactose/H+ symport in Lactobacillus brevis . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994, 91: 3102-3106. 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Djordjevic GM, Tchieu JH, Saier MH Jr: Genes involved in control of galactose uptake in Lactobacillus brevis and reconstitution of the regulatory system in Bacillus subtilis . J Bacteriol 2001, 183: 3224-3236. 10.1128/JB.183.10.3224-3236.2001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Poolman B, Knol J, Mollet B, Nieuwenhuis B, Sulter G: Regulation of bacterial sugar-H+ symport by phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent enzyme I/HPr-mediated phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92: 778-782. 10.1073/pnas.92.3.778View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Flores N, Xiao J, Berry A, Bolivar F, Valle F: Pathway engineering for the production of aromatic compounds in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 1996, 14: 620-623. 10.1038/nbt0596-620View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Xiao H, Gu Y, Ning Y, Yang Y, Mitchell WJ, Jiang W, Yang S: Confirmation and elimination of xylose metabolism bottlenecks in glucose phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system-deficient clostridium acetobutylicum for simultaneous utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77: 7886-7895. 10.1128/AEM.00644-11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mai V, Lorenz WW, Wiegel J: Transformation of Thermoanaerobacterium sp. strain JW/SL-YS485 with plasmid pIKM1 conferring kanamycin resistance. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1997, 148: 163-167. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10283.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaw AJ, Covalla SF, Hogsett DA, Herring CD: Marker removal system for Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum and development of a markerless ethanologen. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77: 2534-2536. 10.1128/AEM.01731-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Shaw AJ, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR: Natural competence in Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium species. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76: 4713-4719. 10.1128/AEM.00402-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tsakraklides et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement