Open Access

Improved glycerol utilization by a triacylglycerol-producing Rhodococcus opacus strain for renewable fuels

  • Kazuhiko Kurosawa1,
  • Andreas Radek1, 3,
  • Jens K Plassmeier1 and
  • Anthony J Sinskey1, 2Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels20158:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0209-z

Received: 2 September 2014

Accepted: 21 January 2015

Published: 26 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Glycerol generated during renewable fuel production processes is potentially an attractive substrate for the production of value-added materials by fermentation. An engineered strain MITXM-61 of the oleaginous bacterium Rhodococcus opacus produces large amounts of intracellular triacylglycerols (TAGs) for lipid-based biofuels on high concentrations of glucose and xylose. However, on glycerol medium, MITXM-61 does not produce TAGs and grows poorly. The aim of the present work was to construct a TAG-producing R. opacus strain capable of high-cell-density cultivation at high glycerol concentrations.

Results

An adaptive evolution strategy was applied to improve the conversion of glycerol to TAGs in R. opacus MITXM-61. An evolved strain, MITGM-173, grown on a defined medium with 16 g L−1 glycerol, produced 2.3 g L−1 of TAGs, corresponding to 40.4% of the cell dry weight (CDW) and 0.144 g g−1 of TAG yield per glycerol consumed. MITGM-173 was able to grow on high concentrations (greater than 150 g L−1) of glycerol. Cultivated in a medium containing an initial concentration of 20 g L−1 glycerol, 40 g L−1 glucose, and 40 g L−1 xylose, MITGM-173 was capable of simultaneously consuming the mixed substrates and yielding 13.6 g L−1 of TAGs, representing 51.2% of the CDM. In addition, when 20 g L−1 glycerol was pulse-loaded into the culture with 40 g L−1 glucose and 40 g L−1 xylose at the stationary growth phase, MITGM-173 produced 14.3 g L−1 of TAGs corresponding to 51.1% of the CDW although residual glycerol in the culture was observed. The addition of 20 g L−1 glycerol in the glucose/xylose mix resulted in a TAG yield per glycerol consumed of 0.170 g g−1 on the initial addition and 0.279 g g−1 on the pulse addition of glycerol.

Conclusion

We have generated a TAG-producing R. opacus MITGM-173 strain that shows significantly improved glycerol utilization in comparison to the parental strain. The present study demonstrates that the evolved R. opacus strain shows significant promise for developing a cost-effective bioprocess to generate advanced renewable fuels from mixed sugar feedstocks supplemented with glycerol.

Keywords

Triacylglycerol Renewable fuels Rhodococcus opacus Adaptive evolution Glycerol utilization Co-fermentation

Background

The development of upgrading technologies capable of producing substitutes for petroleum-based fuels and chemicals has gained momentum [1-3]. Glycerol is an inevitable by-product generated during biodiesel and bioethanol production processes [4-7]. In fact, in the biodiesel production process, glycerol is the main by-product—approximately 10% (w/w) by weight of the total product—of the transesterification of triacylglycerols from animal fats and plant oils with an alcohol [6]. Bioethanol produced through the fermentation of sugars by yeasts is also accompanied by the generation of glycerol as a fermentation by-product, comprising up to 2% by volume of the liquid fraction in the whole stillage [8]. The utilization of glycerol as a carbon source for microbial production processes has not been studied extensively, because glycerol was more expensive than other carbon sources used in the conventional fermentation industry. On the contrary, methods for producing glycerol by fermentation had been studied [9]. However, due to the dramatic increase in renewable fuel productions worldwide over the last few years, glycerol production has increased as a waste product, which has led to a decrease in its price, thereby allowing it to become an attractive feedstock for production of value-added materials by fermentation [4,6].

In microorganisms, glycerol metabolism has been better understood in Escherichia coli [10]. Although E. coli was long thought to require the presence of external electron acceptors (respiratory metabolism) for glycerol utilization, it has recently been shown that the bacterium can metabolize glycerol in a fermentative manner (in the absence of electron acceptors) [11]. Glycerol dissimilation in E. coli can proceed through three different routes to produce the glycolytic intermediate dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP): the aerobic GlpK (glycerol kinase encoded by glpK)-GlpD (aerobic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by glpD) and anaerobic GlpK (glycerol kinase encoded by glpK)-GlpABC (anaerobic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by glpABC) respiratory routes, or the GldA (glycerol dehydrogenase encoded by gldA)-DhaKLM (dihydroxyacetone kinase encoded by dhaKLM) fermentative route [12-14]. Of these routes, the GldA-DhaKLM fermentive route has been shown to enable efficient utilization of glycerol under both anaerobic and microaerobic conditions. The glycerol metabolism is regulated in various ways. In particular, in the presence of glycerol with glucose, wild-type E. coli has been known to exhibit diauxic growth, showing that glucose is preferentially consumed before glycerol [15,16]. While many microorganisms have been shown to ferment glycerol, the fermentative metabolism of glycerol has been reported only in species of the genera Anaerobiospirillum [17], Bacillus [18], Citrobacter [18], Clostridium [19], Enterobacter [20], Escherichia [11], Klebsiella [21], Lactobacillus [18], and Propionibacterium [22]. More recently, there have been extensive studies for the development of microbiological processes to convert glycerol into various value-added materials, aimed at the production of arabitol [23], 2,3-butanediol [24], butanol [25], citric acid [26], ethanol [27,28], hydrogen [29,30], lactic acid [31], polyhydroxybutyrate [32], 1,2-propanediol [33], 1,3-propanediol [34], propionic acid [35], succinate [14], and triacylglycerols (TAGs) [36,37].

TAGs are esters in which three molecules of fatty acids are linked to glycerol and exploited as the precursor to produce lipid-based biofuels such as biodiesel and hydrocarbon fuels [38,39]. TAGs are found extensively as the carbon storage molecule in animals, plants, algae, and microorganisms [40,41]. Many sources of TAGs, with the exception of those with very short chain fatty acids, are converted to hydrocarbon-based biofuels that are identical in virtually every respect to commercially available petroleum-derived fuels [42,43]. Practically, renewable jet fuel, termed hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA), made from vegetable-based TAG-containing feedstocks, has been successfully tested in military and commercial aircrafts [44,45]. However, technologies for cost-effectively converting renewable natural resources to biofuel molecules, in order to minimize the conflict between food and fuel use, have not yet been developed [46]. Oleaginous microorganisms that utilize a great variety of substrates offer benefits for TAG production from biological resources such as waste glycerol and lignocellulosic biomass [47,48].

Rhodococcus opacus PD630 produces TAGs consisting primarily of C16 and C18 series of long chain fatty acids, which are quite similar to those of vegetable-derived TAGs [49]. Steinbüchel and coworkers [50] demonstrated that R. opacus PD630 grown on gluconate is capable of accumulating up to 76% of the cell dry weight (CDW) as TAGs. We have reported that R. opacus PD630 has a rare ability to produce large amounts of TAGs when grown in the presence of high concentrations of glucose [51,52]. In addition, we recently engineered xylose fermenting strains that are capable of completely and simultaneously utilizing both xylose and glucose to produce large amounts of TAGs in the presence of high sugar concentrations [53,54]. Strain MITXM-61 grown in corn stover hydrolysate containing 118 g L−1 of initial sugars was capable of completely utilizing both xylose and glucose in the genuine lignocellulosic feedstock and yielded 15.9 g L−1 of TAGs with a productivity of 0.133 g L−1 h−1, corresponding to 54% of the CDW [54]. However, the strain does not produce TAGs on glycerol, and the growth is poor. Here, we aimed to improve glycerol utilization in R. opacus to ensure the effective use of glycerol and constructed a TAG-producing R. opacus strain capable of high-cell-density cultivation at high concentrations of glycerol or mixtures of glucose/xylose/glycerol.

Results

Construction of a robust glycerol-fermenting R. opacus strain

The cell growth of R. opacus PD630 was extremely poor in glycerol fermentations. In order to generate a TAG-producing strain with improved growth on glycerol, we sought to apply an adaptive evolution approach. Competent cells of the engineered xylose-fermenting R. opacus MITXM-61 strain, a PD630 derivative strain, were treated by electroporation and spread on a defined agar medium containing 16 g L−1 glycerol as the sole carbon source. Several colonies appeared on the plates, and the clones were isolated after 10 days of cultivation (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The growth of five isolates, termed MITGM-71, −72, −73, −74, and −81, was tested in a defined medium with 16 g L−1 glycerol in flasks. The cell growth of those strains started after a long lag phase that lasted from 3 to 4 days, as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S2. Strain MITGM-73 exhibited robust cell growth, reaching an optical density (OD660) of approximately 10 after 6 days of cultivation, but exhibited very slow growth on glycerol compared to other carbon sources. To further improve its glycerol utilization, MITGM-73 was subjected to an adaptive evolution procedure to select fast-growing glycerol-fermenting variants. Sequential transfers of MITGM-73 cells in batch flask cultivations with defined medium, supplemented 100 g L−1 glycerol, were carried out. Following inoculation, the culture was allowed to grow until the early stationary phase and then inoculated into the fresh medium. This transfer procedure was repeated for four iterations. The cell growth during the adaptive evolution is presented in Additional file 1: Figure S3. The initial culture grew slowly with a lag phase of 3 days, but after one transfer, it eventually grew faster with a short lag phase of 1 day. After five batch cultures, the culture was streaked on the plates with glycerol for isolated colonies. One of the fastest growing isolates was selected and designated strain MITGM-173 after comparing 20 isolates for their growth in the glycerol medium.

Growth of R. opacus MITGM-173 with high glycerol concentrations

Our previous studies [51,54] showed that R. opacus PD630 derivatives were capable of growing on glucose and xylose at high initial concentrations of greater than 200 g L−1 as the sole carbon source. We examined the growth of strain MITGM-173 on defined media with initial glycerol concentrations of 16, 40, 80, 120, 160, or 200 g L−1 in flask cultures (Figure 1). Growth of the strain began after 2 days of cultivation in media containing up to 160 g L−1 of glycerol, and the culture reached stationary phase after 5 days of cultivation on concentrations of 16, 40, 80, and 120 g L−1 glycerol.
Figure 1

Growth of R. opacus MITGM-173 on varying concentrations of glycerol. Glycerol concentrations of defined media were 16, 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 g L−1 in shake flasks. Values and error bars represent the mean and s.d. of triplicate experiments.

TAG production of R. opacus MITGM-173 on glycerol and/or glucose

To elucidate the glycerol-assimilation profile by strain MITGM-173, we carried out flask cultivations in defined media containing either 16 g L−1 glycerol, a mixture of 8 g L−1 glycerol and 8 g L−1 glucose, or 16 g L−1 glucose. In these cultures, the kinetics of TAG production as fatty acids, CDW, fatty acid content as percent of CDW, and residual sugars and (NH4)2SO4 present in culture supernatants were determined (Figure 2a–c). When MITGM-173 was cultivated on glycerol alone (Figure 2a), the growth began after 1 day of cultivation and TAG accumulation increased after (NH4)2SO4 was depleted. In these cultures, maximum TAG production of 2.3 (±0.3) g L−1, representing 40.4 (±3.1) % of CDW occurred after 6 days of cultivation, at which point the residual glycerol was completely consumed. Growing on a glycerol/glucose mix (Figure 2b) and glucose alone (Figure 2c), resulted in TAG production of 2.7 (±0.3) g L−1 and 2.9 (±0.2) g L−1, respectively, corresponding to yields of 44.4 (±3.9) % and 47.8 (±3.6) % of CDW, respectively, during the stationary phase, which was 5 and 3 days post-inoculation, respectively. MITGM-173 grown on a glycerol/glucose mix had a short lag phase and a fast generation time in comparison with that on glycerol alone. The concentrations of glycerol and glucose in the medium simultaneously decreased over time although utilization of glycerol was delayed in the first day, and the complete consumption of glycerol and glucose occurred after 4 and 2 days of cultivation, respectively. During 6 days of cultivation, the maximum yield of TAG per gram of carbon source consumed was 0.144 (±0.015) g g−1 on glycerol alone, 0.169 (±0.018) g g−1 on a glycerol/glucose mix, and 0.181 (±0.002) g g−1 on glucose alone, respectively. When a mixture of glycerol and glucose was used as the carbon substrates in the medium, both the maximum TAG production and TAG yield per carbon source consumed were lower than those attained with glucose alone but higher than those with glycerol alone. The identity of the lipids and the fatty acid composition profiles of MITGM-173 cells grown under these conditions were quite similar to one another. A thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis of the crude organic extract from the cells showed that the TAG fraction amounted to approximately 90% (w/w) of the extractable lipids (Figure 2d). The fatty acid composition of the lipids was composed mainly of palmitic acid (22% to 28%), cis-10-heptadecenoic acid (16% to 20%), and oleic acid (17% to 24%), as revealed by gas chromatography (GC) analysis (Figure 2e).
Figure 2

TAG production from glycerol and/or glucose by R. opacus MITGM-173. (a-c) Time course kinetics of TAG production as fatty acids. The strain was grown in defined media containing 16 g L−1 glycerol (a), a mixture of 8 g L−1 glycerol and 8 g L−1 glucose (b), and 16 g L−1 glucose (c) in shake flasks. Values and error bars represent the mean and s.d. of triplicate experiments. (d) Thin-layer chromatography analysis of the crude organic extracts obtained from the cells grown on glycerol (a), glycerol/glucose (b), and glucose (c) for 6 days. Lipids were extracted and separated on a silica gel plate as described in the “Methods” section. Lipid standards of TAG (1,2-dioleoyl-3-stearoyl-rac-glycerol), DAG (1,2-dipalmitoyl-rac-glycerol), and MAG (DL-α-palmitin) were used to identify the Rf value for TAG under the conditions used. Lanes: 1, crude lipid extract (10 μg) on glycerol; 2, crude lipid extract (10 μg) on glycerol/glucose; 3, crude lipid extract (10 μg) on glucose; S, TAG (3 μg)/DAG (3 μg)/MAG (3 μg) mixtures. (e) Fatty acid composition as percentage of total fatty acids (g g−1) of lipids from the cells growing in the defined medium containing glycerol (a), glycerol/glucose (b), or glucose (c) for 6 days. Data are results of triplicate experiments, ±s.d.

Meanwhile, cultivating in defined media containing either 16 g L−1glycerol, a mixture of 8 g L−1 glycerol and 8 g L−1 glucose, or 16 g L−1 glucose, the parental strain MITXM-61 was hardly able to grow on glycerol alone (Additional file 1: Figure S4a). In the case of culturing on glucose alone (Additional file 1: Figure S4c) and mixed glycerol/glucose substrates (Additional file 1: Figure S4b), the TAG production in the stationary phase 3 days post-inoculation, at which point the residual glucose was completely consumed, was 2.9 (±0.2) g L−1 and 1.0 (±0.2) g L−1, respectively, corresponding to 48.9 (±1.9) % CDW and 30.4 (±2.9) % CDW, respectively. MITXM-61 was also unable to utilize glycerol in the mixed substrates when glycerol was included in the medium together with glucose. The results demonstrated that the evolved strain MITGM-173 harbored significantly improved glycerol-utilizing capacity, compared to the parental strain MITXM-61.

Optimization of TAG production from glycerol by R. opacus MITGM-173

High-cell-density cultivation is essential to maximize volumetric productivity and to reduce production costs, and the media used should be composed of highly concentrated carbon sources [55,56]. We have demonstrated that TAG production in R. opacus is greatly affected by the ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C/N) in the medium [51-54]. The operational C/N ratio of glycerol and (NH4)2SO4 in a defined medium for maximum production of TAGs by strain MITGM-173 was optimized using a response surface methodology. The experimental design model assigned nine combinations of glycerol and (NH4)2SO4 concentrations including three repetitions at a central point (100 g L−1 glycerol and 6.23 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4) for a total of 11 bioreactors in batch fermentations. The design matrix of the variables in coded units and actual concentrations along with the experimental response is presented in Table 1. Strain MITGM-173 grown in the medium containing 100 g L−1 glycerol and 6.23 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 yielded maximum TAGs of 13.8 (±0.6) g L−1, representing 45.2 (±0.7) % of the CDW, at which point the residual glycerol was almost completely consumed. Strain MITGM-173 had a critical feature capable of performing high-cell-density cultivation at high glycerol concentrations and producing large amounts of TAGs. We performed analysis on the experimental data using the software StatGraphics. The coefficient of determination (R 2) was 0.9314, suggesting a relatively high correlation between predicted and experimental values. The estimated parameters from simulation with the model equation are as follows:
$$ Y = -8.66238 + 0.246034{X}_1 + 3.26793{X}_2\ \hbox{--}\ 0.0013664{X_1}^2 + 0.00250372{X}_1{X}_2\ \hbox{--}\ 0.267951{X_2}^2 $$
Table 1

Central composite experimental design matrix defining glycerol and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 concentrations

Run

Real values

Coded values

Fatty acid production

X 1

X 2

X 1

X 2

% CDW

g L −1 of culture

1

100

6.23

0

0

45.9

13.9

2

30

1.83

−1

−1

44.3

5.1

3

100

6.23

0

0

45.2

14.3

4

200

6.23

1.41

0

6.0

0.2

5

30

10.63

−1

1

18.2

2.1

6

100

6.23

0

0

44.5

13.2

7

170

10.63

1

1

10.8

0.5

8

170

1.83

1

−1

14.6

0.4

9

0

6.23

−1.41

0

0.0

0.0

10

100

12.45

0

1.41

23.0

6.5

11

100

0

0

−1.41

0.0

0.0

R. opacus MITGM-173 was inoculated in the modified defined media in bioreactors. The data for TAG production as fatty acids represent the maximum values during 10 days of cultivation.

X 1 glycerol concentration (g L−1), X 2 (NH4)2SO4 concentration (g L−1).

where Y is the predicted response (TAG production, g L−1 as fatty acids) and X 1 and X 2 are coded values of glycerol concentration (g L−1) and (NH4)2SO4 concentration (g L−1), respectively. The surface plots illustrated by the equation are presented (Figure 3). The experimental design predicted that growing MITGM-173 cells in a defined medium with a C/N ratio of 14.7 containing 96.0 g L−1 glycerol and 6.55 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 would result in a maximal TAG production of 13.8 g L−1 as fatty acids. The C/N ratio for maximum TAG production of MITGM-173 on glycerol was slightly lower than that (C/N of 17.8) of PD630 on glucose [51] and that (C/N of 16.5) of MITXM-61 on xylose [54]. The predicted yield was validated by batch-culture fermentations with the optimized conditions. As predicted, the maximum TAG production of 13.4 (±1.5) g L−1 as fatty acids corresponding to 44.0 (±2.6) % of the CDW occurred after 10 days of cultivation, which was close to the predicted yield (Figure 4). Under these cultural conditions, the yield of total fatty acids per gram of glycerol consumed was 0.147 (±0.007) g g−1.
Figure 3

Response surface plot of the effect of glycerol and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 concentrations on TAG production. As fatty acids by R. opacus MITGM-173. Curves and points represent predicted values and experimental data, respectively.

Figure 4

Time course of TAG production as fatty acids from glycerol by R. opacus MITGM-173. Performed under the optimized conditions. The strain was grown in a modified defined medium containing 96 g L−1 glucose and 6.55 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 in bioreactors. Values and error bars represent the mean and s.d. of triplicate experiments.

Batch fermentation of R. opacus MITGM-173 on mixtures of glucose and xylose with glycerol

We next explored the impact of TAG production by R. opacus MITGM-173 on mixtures of xylose and glucose, supplemented with glycerol, in the bioreactor system. Lignocellulosic hydrolysates are mixtures of hexoses and pentoses, mostly glucose and xylose with a typical mass ration around 2:1 [57]. Glycerol is produced as a by-product at levels of approximately 10% (w/w) of the total biodiesel generated [4-7]. Consequently, we investigated TAG production of strain MITGM-173 on mixed carbon sources in a 2:2:1 ratio of glucose/xylose/glycerol with an initial total substrate concentration of 100 g L−1. When cells of MITGM-173 were inoculated into a modified defined medium containing initial concentrations of 40 g L−1 xylose and 40 g L−1 glucose (Figure 5a), the cell growth increased rapidly after 12 h of cultivation, and nitrogen depletion occurred between 2 and 3 days. Glucose was completely depleted after 2 days and xylose after 3 days as a result of the concomitant consumption of xylose and glucose in the medium. The TAG production as fatty acids after 3 and 7 days of cultivation was 9.5 (±1.1) g L−1 and 10.2 (±1.5) g L−1, respectively, corresponding to 42.3 (±0.8) % and 44.0 (±3.9) %, respectively, of the CDW. The maximum yield of TAGs as fatty acids per gram of carbon source consumed was 0.128 (±0.009) g g−1 during 7 days of cultivation. In contrast, when MITGM-173 was cultivated in media containing initial concentrations of 40 g L−1 xylose, 40 g L−1 glucose, and 20 g L−1 glycerol (Figure 5b), and initial concentrations of 40 g L−1 xylose and 40 g L−1 glucose with pulse loading of 20 g L−1 glycerol after 2 days of cultivation (Figure 5c) and the TAG production after 3 and 7 days of cultivation were 10.0 (±0.1) g L−1 and 13.6 (±1.4) g L−1, respectively, corresponding to 44.4 (±1.4) % CDW and 51.2 (±2.1) % CDW, respectively, on the xylose/glucose/glycerol mix, and 11.1 (±1.4) g L−1 and 14.3 (±1.2) g L−1, respectively, corresponding to 39.8 (±0.6) % CDW and 51.1 (±3.1) % CDW, respectively, on the xylose/glucose mix with the pulse loading glycerol. The concentrations of all three carbon sources in the media simultaneously decreased over time, although the consumption of glycerol was delayed in the first day after the addition of glycerol as compared to that of glucose or xylose. The consumption of xylose, glucose and glycerol in the xylose/glucose/glycerol mix was complete after 4, 2 and 7 days, respectively, of cultivation (Figure 5b). When the glycerol pulse was applied to the mixed sugars, xylose and glucose were consumed after 3 and 2 days, respectively, of cultivation and a residual glycerol amount of 5.3 g L−1 was observed after 7 days of cultivation (Figure 5c). The maximum yield of TAGs per gram of carbon source consumed during 7 days of cultivation was 0.136 (±0.006) g g−1 on the xylose/glucose/glycerol mix, and 0.151 (±0.004) g g−1 on the xylose/glucose mix with pulse loading glycerol. When glycerol in the xylose/glucose mix medium was added, the maximum TAG yield per carbon source consumed was higher than that with the xylose/glucose mix alone. The identity of the lipids and the fatty acid composition of MITGX-173 grown under those conditions were similar to one another. The major component of the intracellular lipids was TAGs, and the fatty acids consisted primarily of palmitic acid (26 to 29%), cis-10-heptadecenoic acid (18 to 21%) and oleic acid (13 to 15%) (Figure 5d, e).
Figure 5

TAG production from mixed substrates of glucose, xylose, and glycerol by R. opacus MITGM-173. (a-c) Time course kinetics of TAG production as fatty acids. The strain was grown in modified defined media supplemented with 5.56 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4 containing a mixture of 40 g L−1 xylose and 40 g L−1 glucose (a), a mixture of 40 g L−1 xylose, 40 g L−1 glucose and 20 g L−1 glycerol (b), and a mixture of 40 g L−1 xylose and 40 g L−1 glucose with pulse loading of 20 g L−1 glycerol after 2 days of cultivation (c) in bioreactors. Values and error bars represent the mean and s.d. of triplicate experiments. (d) Thin-layer chromatography analysis of the crude organic extracts from the cells growing on xylose/glucose (a), xylose/glucose/glycerol (b), and xylose/glucose with pulse loading of glycerol (c) for 7 days. Lanes: 1, crude lipid extract (10 μg) on xylose/glucose; 2, crude lipid extract (10 μg) on xylose/glucose/glycerol; 3, crude lipid extract (10 μg) on xylose/glucose with pulse loading of glycerol; S, TAG (6 μg)/DAG (3 μg)/MAG (3 μg) mixtures. (e) Fatty acid composition as percentage of total fatty acids (g g−1) of lipids from the cells growing in the defined medium containing xylose/glucose (a), xylose/glucose/glycerol (b), or xylose/glucose with pulse loading of glycerol (c) for 7 days. Data are results of triplicate experiments, ±s.d.

Discussion

The capability to utilize glycerol efficiently is advantageous for microbial conversion process to develop cost-effective, streamlined bioprocesses in renewable fuel production. In addition, development of microbial technology for efficiently converting lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels has been considered as a potential solution for reducing current petroleum consumption and carbon emissions. Previously, we have developed a TAG-producing R. opacus MITXM-61 strain, which can efficiently coferment with glucose and xylose present predominantly in hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass [54]. Strain MITXM-61 was able to grow faintly on glycerol. The use of evolutionary engineering has proven to be instrumental in obtaining phenotypes of microorganisms with improved properties [58-60]. In present work, therefore, we applied an evolutionary approach to improve glycerol utilization in the R. opacus.

As a result, we constructed a TAG-producing R. opacus MITGM-173 strain capable of growing on glycerol concentrations greater than 150 g L−1 (Figure 1), as well as xylose. The strain grown on a mixture of 40 g L−1 glucose, 40 g L−1 xylose and 20 g L−1 glycerol utilized the substrates at maximum consumption rates of 0.833 g L−1 h−1, 0.721 g L−1 h−1 and 0.119 g L−1 h−1, respectively, and yielded 13.6 g L−1 of TAGs after 7 days of cultivation (Figure 5b). Strain MITGM-173 was capable of completely utilizing carbon sources in a 2:2:1 ratio of glucose/xylose/glycerol with an initial total substrate concentration of 100 g L−1. The maximum TAG production of MITGM-173 grown on a mixture of 40 g L−1 glucose and 40 g L−1 xylose was 10.2 g L−1 with maximum consumption rates of 0.923 g L−1 h−1 by glucose, and 0.843 g L−1 h−1 by xylose (Figure 5a). The TAG yield per substrate consumed (0.136 g g−1) on a 2:2:1 ratio of glucose/xylose/glycerol was slightly higher than that (0.128 g g−1) observed on the 2:2 glucose/xylose without glycerol. The consumption curve of three substrates on the 2:2:1 glucose/xylose/glycerol culture sequentially exhibited a simultaneous pattern in contrast to a diauxie. Most microorganisms preferentially consume glucose in mixed substrates due to carbon catabolite repression or allosteric competition of the sugar in sugar transport [61,62]. The diauxic metabolism has been a major bottleneck to complete conversion and efficient utilization of multiple substrates [63]. Strain MITGM-173 was capable of utilizing multiple substrates independent of each other, although the consumption rate on glycerol was remarkably slower than that on glucose or xylose.

In addition, cultivating in a mixture of 40 g L−1 xylose and 40 g L−1 glucose with pulse loading of 20 g L−1 glycerol after 2 days of cultivation, MITGM-173 consumed the pulsed glycerol at the maximum consumption rate of 0.123 g L−1 h−1 and produced 14.3 g L−1 of TAGs corresponding to 0.151 g g−1 yield per carbon sources consumed after 7 days of cultivation, at which point the observed residual glycerol concentration was 5.3 g L−1 (Figure 5c). Interestingly, the maximum TAG production and the TAG yield per carbon sources consumed in the mixture with the pulse loading of glycerol were higher than those with the initial addition of glycerol. Based on the results obtained in mixtures containing 40 g L−1 glucose and 40 g L−1 xylose (Figure 5a), excessive addition of 20 g L−1 glycerol in the glucose/xylose resulted in an increase of 3.4 g L−1 TAGs (no residual glycerol) on the initial addition, and 4.1 g L−1 (residual glycerol of 5.3 g/L) on the pulse loading, corresponding to 0.170 g g−1 and 0.279 g g−1, respectively, of the TAG yield per glycerol consumed (Figure 5b, c). The results showed that the pulse loading is a better approach compared to initial addition in regard to improvement of TAG productivity on glycerol in the R. opacus. The pulsed glycerol might serve as the direct intracellular precursor for synthesis of TAGs. More importantly, elucidation of this unique glycerol-assimilation mechanism should be of great importance in developing a superior strain, which results in a high yield of TAGs. The maximum theoretical conversion of glucose to TAGs in microorganisms is approximately 0.316 g g−1 (TAG yield per sugar consumed) [64]. One of the major challenges for developing the cost-effective streamlined bioprocess is to achieve yields that are close to theoretical limits [65].

Thus, the fermentation performance of strain MITGM-173 on glycerol may provide important clues to the construction of an industrial strain with high TAG yield. While the simultaneous and complete utilization of multiple substrates of strain MITGM-173 is ideal for production from renewable resources, the very slow consumption of glycerol would seem to be a barrier to its industrial application. The relatively shorter consumption by R. opacus on multiple substrates simultaneously could make this organism a practical bioconverter for TAG production. Glycerol metabolism by Rhodococcus species has not been studied thoroughly. Further studies need to be carried out to elucidate the genetic changes involved in the improvement of glycerol utilization and the underlying glycerol assimilation mechanism as well as the mechanism and regulation of simultaneous metabolism of multiple carbon substrates by R. opacus. The present study demonstrated that an evolved strain, MITGM-173, has potential towards production of advanced biofuels from low-cost feedstocks of glycerol and lignocellulosic biomass.

Conclusions

The adaptive evolution approach has proved useful for optimization of the inefficient glycerol-utilizing R. opacus strain. The evolved strain, MITGM-173, shows significantly improved glycerol metabolizing capacity in comparison to the parental strain, MITXM-61. Strain MITGM-173 was capable of utilizing high concentrations of glycerol or mixed glycerol/glucose/xylose simultaneously and producing large amounts of TAGs. The pulse addition of glycerol into the glucose/xylose mixture resulted in conspicuously increased TAG yield per glycerol consumed. Elucidation of the underlying glycerol-assimilation mechanism will provide great potential in constructing an industrial strain with high TAG yield. This study revealed that the evolved R. opacus strain has critical features of the biocatalyst for developing a cost-effective manufacturing paradigm to generate advanced renewable fuels. To our knowledge, this is the first report of any Rhodococcus strains capable of cofermenting glycerol, glucose and xylose.

Methods

Bacterial strains and media

A list of strains used in this study is given in Additional file 2: Table S1. R. opacus MITXM-61 was constructed in our previous study [54]. Glycerol-fermenting MITXM-61-derivatives were constructed in this study. The culture media used were LB broth (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD) and a defined medium containing the following composition per liter: 16 g glycerol, 1.0 g (NH4)2SO4, and mineral components consisted of 1.0 g MgSO4•7H2O, 0.015 g CaCl2•2H2O, 1.0 ml of a trace element solution, 1.0 ml stock A solution, and 35.2 ml 1.0 M phosphate buffer as described [66]. Modifications of the defined medium are stated in table and figure legends. Solid media were supplemented with 2% (w/v) agar. The strains were routinely maintained on LB agar medium and preserved in 20% (v/v) glycerol at −80 °C. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted.

Strain construction

Competent cells of R. opacus MITXM-61 were prepared, as previously described [54], and treated with electroporation (Bio-Rad gene pulser, Hercules, CA) at 2.5 kV, 25 μF, and 200 Ω in a 2-mm electroporation cuvette (VWR, Radnor, PA). The pulsed cells were diluted with LB broth, regenerated for 3 h with gentle agitation, plated onto a defined agar medium containing 16 g L−1 glycerol, and incubated to harbor glycerol utilizing strains. After 10 days of cultivation, spontaneous mutants that exhibited robust growth on glycerol were isolated.

Strain MITGM-73, one of the glycerol-utilizing isolates, was used for serial transfers of cells using repetitive cultures in flasks. The cells grown on LB agar medium for 3 days were inoculated into a 250-mL baffled flask with 50 mL of the defined medium containing 100 g L−1 glycerol to an initial OD of 1.0. When the cells were grown to early stationary phase, 5 mL of culture broth from the preceding flask was transferred to a new flask culture with the same medium composition. This procedure was repeated for four iterations. From the culture broth after a total of 4 generations (22 days), 20 colonies were randomly isolated by plating for single clones on a defined agar medium with 16 g L−1 glycerol and tested again for growth in flasks with a defined medium containing 100 g L−1 glycerol. One of the fastest growing strains was named MITGM-173 and used for further experiments.

Fermentation conditions

All cultures were grown at 30°C. Cell growth was monitored by determining the optical density (OD) at 660 nm (Thermo Scientific GENESYS 20, Waltham, MA). R. opacus seed cultures were prepared in a modified defined medium supplemented with 16 g L−1 glucose. Cells from colonies grown on LB agar medium for 3 days were inoculated into the modified medium in a flask. The culture was cultivated for 2 days until the late exponential phase. Unless otherwise stated, cultures for flask and bioreactor experiments were inoculated with the seed culture to an initial OD of 1.0 (2.5 × 108 cfu mL−1). Shake flask experiments were carried out using 250-mL baffled flasks with a working volume of 50 mL and incubated on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm (Multitron, Infors, Bottmingen, Switzerland). Bioreactor experiments were conducted in a 2-L fermentor (Bioengineering bioreactor, R’ALF, Wald, Switzerland) with a working volume of 1 L. The pH of the medium was kept constant at 6.9 ± 0.1 by the automatic addition of 2 M NaOH. The dissolved oxygen level was monitored using an Ingold polarographic probe (Mettler-Toledo Ingold Inc., Bedford, MA). The dissolved oxygen tension was maintained above 60% by using an adjusted stirrer profile for increasing the agitation speed from 300 rpm up to 1,000 rpm and automatically sparging with a mixture of air and pure oxygen at a constant gas flow rate of 1.0 vvm. When necessary, polypropylene glycol P 2,000 was manually added to each vessel to prevent foam formation.

Response surface methodology for optimization of TAG production

The ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C/N) in the medium is the most important for increased TAG production in R. opacus [51,52]. The statistical experimental approach using Box-Wilson central composite design [67] with five settings for each of two factors was applied in the optimization of TAG production from glycerol. Glycerol concentration (g L−1) and (NH4)2SO4 concentration (g L−1) were chosen as independent variables, and TAG production (g L−1) was used as a dependent output variable. A set of 11 runs was conducted with nine combinations of glycerol and (NH4)2SO4 concentrations including three repetitions at the central point in submerged batch fermentations (Table 1). The software StatGraphics (StatPoint Inc., USA) was used for regression and graphical analysis of the data. The optimum values of the selected variables were obtained by solving the regression equation. Three-dimensional surface plots were drawn by SigmaPlot 11 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA) to display the interaction among various variables.

Analytical methods

CDW was determined by lyophilizing cell pellet after centrifuging 10 mL of culture broth at 8,000 g for 15 min and washing the cell pellet twice in deionized water. The lyophilized cell pellet was used to analyze the identity of lipids and the fatty acid composition. For the identification of lipids, TLC experiments were carried out using a two-step resolution method as previously described [51]. Lyophilized cell pellets were extracted with methanol and chloroform (1:1, v/v) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with gentle agitation. Ten micrograms of crude lipid extract was spotted onto silica gel 60 plates (EMD Chemicals Inc., Gibbstown, NJ). Samples were resolved using an initial polar solvent system consisting of 60:35:5 chloroform/methanol/water, followed by a second solvent system containing 70:30:1 hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid. Resolved lipids were visualized by charring. Plates were sprayed with a 3% cupric acetate-8% aqueous phosphoric acid solution followed by baking in a 200°C oven for 5 min. To determine the fatty acid content of the cells and the composition of lipids, the whole cells were subjected to methanolysis and the resulting fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were analyzed by GC as described in detail recently [51,53]. GC analysis of FAMEs was performed by using an Agilent 6850 series II network GC system equipped with an Agilent DB-Wax column (30 m by 0.32 mm, 0.5 μm film) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) with hydrogen as the carrier gas. A 2-μL portion of the sample was injected with a 30:1 split ratio. The inlet was maintained at 250°C. The oven was held at 80°C for 5 min, heated to 220°C at 20°C min−1, and then held at 220°C for 5 min. Peak detection was carried out by a flame ionization detector, which was maintained at 300°C. The fatty acids were identified and quantified by comparison to standard FAMEs. Fatty acid content was defined as the percentage of the ratio of fatty acids to cell dry weight (% CDW). Total lipid content was calculated as the sum of total fatty acid contents for nine FAMEs: methyl myristate (C14:0), methyl pentadecanoate (C15:0), methyl palmitate (C16:0), methyl palmitoleate (C16:1), methyl heptadecanoate (C17:0), methyl cis-10-heptadecenoate (C17:1), methyl stearate (C18:0), methyl oleate (C18:1), and methy linoleate (C18:2). The supernatants of the culture broth were used for analyses of residual glycerol, glucose, xylose, and (NH4)2SO4 after filtration through 0.2-μm syringe filters. Glycerol, glucose, and xylose concentrations in the culture were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Agilent 1100 system) fitted with an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad) coupled to a refractive index (RI) detector as previously described [51,53]. Ammonia concentration in the culture was measured using a Sigma Ammonia Assay Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Abbreviations

TAG: 

Triacylglycerol

CDW: 

Cell dry weight

OD: 

Optical density

C/N: 

Carbon to nitrogen ratio

HPLC: 

High-performance liquid chromatography

GC: 

Gas chromatography

FAME: 

Fatty acid methyl ester

TLC: 

Thin-layer chromatography

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Sweetwater Energy, Inc. and the MIT Energy Initiative for financial support. The authors would like to thank Christopher J. Brigham for a critical review of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(2)
Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(3)
Present address: Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-1: Biotechnology, Systems Biotechnology

References

  1. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science. 2006;311:484–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doering OC, Hamburg SP, Melillo JM, Wander MM, et al. Agriculture. Sustainable biofuels redux. Science. 2008;322:49–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature. 2012;488:294–303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. da Silva GP, Mack M, Contiero J. Glycerol: a promising and abundant carbon source for industrial microbiology. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:30–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Li C, Lesnik KL, Liu H. Microbial conversion of waste glycerol from biodiesel production into value-added products. Energies. 2013;6:4739–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang F, Hanna MA, Sun R. Value-added uses for crude glycerol—a byproduct of biodiesel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Clomburg JM, Gonzalez R. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a platform for renewable fuels and chemicals. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:20–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Rausch KD, Belyea RL. The future of coproducts from corn processing. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2006;128:47–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang ZX, Zhuge J, Fang H, Prior BA. Glycerol production by microbial fermentation: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2001;19:201–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Murarka A, Dharmadi Y, Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R. Fermentative utilization of glycerol by Escherichia coli and its implications for the production of fuels and chemicals. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:1124–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dharmadi Y, Murarka A, Gonzalez R. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: a new platform for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;94:821–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalez R, Murarka A, Dharmadi Y, Yazdani SS. A new model for the anaerobic fermentation of glycerol in enteric bacteria: trunk and auxiliary pathways in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2008;10:234–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Durnin G, Clomburg J, Yeates Z, Alvarez PJ, Zygourakis K, Campbell P, et al. Understanding and harnessing the microaerobic metabolism of glycerol in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103:148–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Blankschien MD, Clomburg JM, Gonzalez R. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of succinate from glycerol. Metab Eng. 2010;12:409–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin ECC. Glycerol dissimilation and its regulation in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1976;30:535–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Martinez-Gomez K, Flores N, Castaneda HM, Martinez-Batallar G, Hernandez-Chavez G, Ramirez OT, et al. New insights into Escherichia coli metabolism: carbon scavenging, acetate metabolism and carbon recycling responses during growth on glycerol. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee PC, Lee WG, Lee SY, Chang HN. Succinic acid production with reduced by-product formation in the fermentation of Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens using glycerol as a carbon source. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001;72:41–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18:213–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Biebl H. Fermentation of glycerol by Clostridium pasteurianum—batch and continuous culture studies. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;27:18–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ito T, Nakashimada Y, Senba K, Matsui T, Nishio N. Hydrogen and ethanol production from glycerol-containing wastes discharged after biodiesel manufacturing process. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005;100:260–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarvis GN, Moore ER, Thiele JH. Formate and ethanol are the major products of glycerol fermentation produced by a Klebsiella planticola strain isolated from red deer. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83:166–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bories A, Himmi E, Jauregui JJA, Pelayo-Ortiz C, Gonzales VA. Glycerol fermentation with Propionibacteria and optimisation of the production of propionic acid. Sci Des Aliments. 2004;24:121–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshikawa J, Habe H, Morita T, Fukuoka T, Imura T, Iwabuchi H, et al. Production of D-arabitol from raw glycerol by Candida quercitrusa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:2947–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Petrov K, Petrova P. High production of 2,3-butanediol from glycerol by Klebsiella pneumoniae G31. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84:659–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jensen TO, Kvist T, Mikkelsen MJ, Christensen PV, Westermann P. Fermentation of crude glycerol from biodiesel production by Clostridium pasteurianum. J Industrial Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:709–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rymowicz W, Fatykhova AR, Kamzolova SV, Rywinska A, Morgunov IG. Citric acid production from glycerol-containing waste of biodiesel industry by Yarrowia lipolytica in batch, repeated batch, and cell recycle regimes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87:971–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu XY, Jensen PR, Workman M. Bioconversion of crude glycerol feedstocks into ethanol by Pachysolen tannophilus. Bioresour Technol. 2012;104:579–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yu KO, Kim SW, Han SO. Engineering of glycerol utilization pathway for ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4157–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Pott RWM, Howe CJ, Dennis JS. The purification of crude glycerol derived from biodiesel manufacture and its use as a substrate by Rhodopseudomonas palustris to produce hydrogen. Bioresour Technol. 2014;152:464–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Tran KT, Maeda T, Wood TK. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli to enhance hydrogen production from glycerol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:4757–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mazumdar S, Blankschien MD, Clomburg JM, Gonzalez R. Efficient synthesis of L-lactic acid from glycerol by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ibrahim MH, Steinbüchel A. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) production from glycerol by Zobellella denitrificans MW1 via high-cell-density fed-batch fermentation and simplified solvent extraction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:6222–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Clomburg JM, Gonzalez R. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of 1,2-propanediol from glycerol. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:867–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tang XM, Tan YS, Zhu H, Zhao K, Shen W. Microbial conversion of glycerol to 1,3-propanediol by an engineered strain of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:1628–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang A, Yang ST. Propionic acid production from glycerol by metabolically engineered Propionibacterium acidipropionici. Process Biochem. 2009;44:1346–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu JY, Zhao XB, Wang WC, Du W, Liu DH. Microbial conversion of biodiesel byproduct glycerol to triacylglycerols by oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides and the individual effect of some impurities on lipid production. Biochem Eng J. 2012;65:30–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu KO, Jung J, Ramzi AB, Choe SH, Kim SW, Park C, et al. Development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for increasing the accumulation of triacylglycerol as a microbial oil feedstock for biodiesel production using glycerol as a substrate. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110:343–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Vasudevan PT, Briggs M. Biodiesel production—current state of the art and challenges. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35:421–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Lestari S, Maki-Arvela P, Beltramini J, Lu GQ, Murzin DY. Transforming triglycerides and fatty acids into biofuels. ChemSusChem. 2009;2:1109–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Murphy DJ. The biogenesis and functions of lipid bodies in animals, plants and microorganisms. Prog Lipid Res. 2001;40:325–438.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, Jarvis E, Ghirardi M, Posewitz M, Seibert M, et al. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. Plant J. 2008;54:621–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Santillan-Jimenez E, Crocker M. Catalytic deoxygenation of fatty acids and their derivatives to hydrocarbon fuels via decarboxylation/decarbonylation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2012;87:1041–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Furimsky E. Hydroprocessing challenges in biofuels production. Catal Today. 2013;217:13–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Fairley P. Introduction: next generation biofuels. Nature. 2011;474:S2–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearlson M, Wollersheim C, Hileman J. A techno-economic review of hydroprocessed renewable esters and fatty acids for jet fuel production. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2013;7:89–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Peralta-Yahya PP, Zhang F, del Cardayre SB, Keasling JD. Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature. 2012;488:320–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Kosa M, Ragauskas AJ. Lipids from heterotrophic microbes: advances in metabolism research. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29:53–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Dobson R, Gray V, Rumbold K. Microbial utilization of crude glycerol for the production of value-added products. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:217–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Alvarez HM, Mayer F, Fabritius D, Steinbüchel A. Formation of intracytoplasmic lipid inclusions by Rhodococcus opacus strain PD630. Arch Microbiol. 1996;165:377–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Waltermann M, Luftmann H, Baumeister D, Kalscheuer R, Steinbüchel A. Rhodococcus opacus strain PD630 as a new source of high-value single-cell oil? Isolation and characterization of triacylglycerols and other storage lipids. Microbiology. 2000;146:1143–9.Google Scholar
  51. Kurosawa K, Boccazzi P, de Almeida NM, Sinskey AJ. High-cell-density batch fermentation of Rhodococcus opacus PD630 using a high glucose concentration for triacylglycerol production. J Biotechnol. 2010;147:212–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Brigham CJ, Kurosawa K, Rha C, Sinskey AJ. Bacterial carbon storage to value added products. J Microbial Biochem Technol. 2011;S3:002. doi:10.4172/1948-5948.Google Scholar
  53. Kurosawa K, Wewetzer SJ, Sinskey AJ. Engineering xylose metabolism in triacylglycerol-producing Rhodococcus opacus for lignocellulosic fuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Kurosawa K, Wewetzer SJ, Sinskey AJ. Triacylglycerol production from corn stover using a xylose-fermenting Rhodococcus opacus strain for lignocellulosic biofuels. J Microbial Biochem Technol. 2014;6:254–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Riesenberg D, Guthke R. High-cell-density cultivation of microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;51:422–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Park EY. Recent progress in microbial cultivation techniques. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2004;90:1–33.Google Scholar
  57. Carroll A, Somerville C. Cellulosic biofuels. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:165–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Sauer U. Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2001;73:129–69.Google Scholar
  59. Wisselink HW, Toirkens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris AJ. Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:907–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Cheng KK, Lee BS, Masuda T, Ito T, Ikeda K, Hirayama A, et al. Global metabolic network reorganization by adaptive mutations allows fast growth of Escherichia coli on glycerol. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3233.Google Scholar
  61. Dien BS, Cotta MA, Jeffries TW. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;63:258–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Hahn-Hagerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:937–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Kim JH, Block DE, Mills DA. Simultaneous consumption of pentose and hexose sugars: an optimal microbial phenotype for efficient fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;88:1077–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Ratledge C. The role of malic enzyme as the provider of NADPH in oleaginous microorganisms: a reappraisal and unsolved problems. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36:1557–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Janssen HJ, Steinbüchel A. Fatty acid synthesis in Escherichia coli and its applications towards the production of fatty acid based biofuels. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Chartrain M, Jackey B, Taylor C, Sandford V, Gbewonyo K, Lister L, et al. Bioconversion of indene to cis (1S,2R) indandiol and trans (1R,2R) indandiol by Rhodococcus species. J Ferment Bioeng. 1998;86:550–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Sudarjanto G, Keller-Lehmann B, Keller J. Optimization of integrated chemical-biological degradation of a reactive azo dye using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater. 2006;138:160–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kurosawa et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement