Open Access

Chemical and structural changes associated with Cu-catalyzed alkaline-oxidative delignification of hybrid poplar

Biotechnology for Biofuels20158:123

Received: 14 April 2015

Accepted: 30 July 2015

Published: 20 August 2015



Alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment catalyzed by Cu(II) 2,2′-bipyridine complexes has previously been determined to substantially improve the enzymatic hydrolysis of woody plants including hybrid poplar as a consequence of moderate delignification. In the present work, cell wall morphological and lignin structural changes were characterized for this pretreatment approach to gain insights into pretreatment outcomes and, specifically, to identify the extent and nature of lignin modification.


Through TEM imaging, this catalytic oxidation process was shown to disrupt cell wall layers in hybrid poplar. Cu-containing nanoparticles, primarily in the Cu(I) oxidation state, co-localized with the disrupted regions, providing indirect evidence of catalytic activity whereby soluble Cu(II) complexes are reduced and precipitated during pretreatment. The concentration of alkali-soluble polymeric and oligomeric lignin was substantially higher for the Cu-catalyzed oxidative pretreatment. This alkali-soluble lignin content increased with time during the catalytic oxidation process, although the molecular weight distributions were unaltered. Yields of aromatic monomers (including phenolic acids and aldehydes) were found to be less than 0.2 % (wt/wt) on lignin. Oxidation of the benzylic alcohol in the lignin side-chain was evident in NMR spectra of the solubilized lignin, whereas minimal changes were observed for the pretreatment-insoluble lignin.


These results provide indirect evidence for catalytic activity within the cell wall. The low yields of lignin-derived aromatic monomers, together with the detailed characterization of the pretreatment-soluble and pretreatment-insoluble lignins, indicate that the majority of both lignin pools remained relatively unmodified. As such, the lignins resulting from this process retain features closely resembling native lignins and may, therefore, be amenable to subsequent valorization.


Plant cell walls Pretreatment Catalytic oxidation Lignin Alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) pretreatment NMR spectroscopy Electron microscopy


Non-renewable fossil resources have fueled economic development for the past two centuries and are a significant contributor to high standards of living around the world [1]. To meet future needs for the growing global demand for fuels, chemicals, polymers, and materials, new renewable resources must be accessed and new technologies employed in a sustainable fashion. Plant biomass accumulates and stores both solar energy and organic carbon through photosynthetic carbon fixation. As such, plant biomass results from efficient natural pathways for harnessing solar energy and can be utilized as a renewable source for reduced carbon for the production of biobased fuels and products to augment products that are currently derived from fossil resources [2].

Plant biomass is a highly heterogeneous material composed of multiple cell wall biopolymers that are associated primarily by non-covalent interactions and with composition and properties varying by cell and tissue type [3]. A diverse range of approaches is available for the conversion of plant cell wall-derived renewable fuels and chemicals. Many of these utilize a cell wall deconstruction strategy involving chemical pretreatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the cell wall polysaccharides into sugar intermediates that can be subsequently utilized in chemical or biological conversion processes [47]. Structural and transport tissues comprise the bulk of the mass of hardwoods such as hybrid poplar, and are responsible, unless subjected to a cell wall-modifying pretreatment, for the substantial resistance to hydrolysis by cellulolytic enzymes [8]. Pretreatments improve hydrolysis through a combination of chemical and morphological changes to the cell wall that may include lignin and hemicellulose solubilization and/or relocalization that provides improved accessibility of cell wall polysaccharides to hydrolytic enzymes [9]. The higher order structure of the cell wall strongly impacts its response to deconstruction and conversion, and cell wall heterogeneity within woody plants has been implicated in differing responses to deconstruction [10]. The cell walls of woody plants often exhibit higher recalcitrance to these pretreatment processes than graminaceous plants due to higher lignin contents and denser vascular structures [11]. Acid sulfite pulping [1214], alkaline pulping [15], organosolv pulping [16], dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment [17], liquid hot water pretreatment [18, 19], and steam pretreatment [20] have all been successfully employed as pretreatments for woody biomass, although these processes typically require higher chemical loadings, higher temperatures, and/or longer treatment times to achieve comparable hydrolysis yields to those from grasses. Chemical pulping technologies may require substantially less severe reaction conditions when adapted as pretreatments because high levels of delignification are not required [15].

Alkaline-oxidative treatments are ideally suited for the delignification of feedstocks such as woody biomass. These processes have been utilized commercially for wood pulp delignification and bleaching since the early 1980s [21], and for the commercial production of vanillin derived from the lignin removed during sulfite pulping of softwoods since the 1940s [22]. In addition, homogeneous catalysts and activators of O2 and H2O2 have been extensively investigated for their abilities to enhance delignification, for pulp brightening, and for their selectivities toward the desired lignin-directed oxidation reactions versus cellulose scission reactions [2329]. In one study, Korpi et al. screened 189 different metal–ligand combinations for the oxidation of veratryl alcohol to veratraldehyde and found that copper complexes of 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline were especially active [30, 31]. These complexes were also reported to be effective delignification catalysts when H2O2 [32], O2 [33, 34], or both [35] were used as the oxidant. All approaches exhibited concurrent cellulose depolymerization that, although detrimental in instances where the cellulose is to be utilized in materials applications in which fiber strength is a crucial property, may prove beneficial if the desired product is monomeric sugars.

Previously we demonstrated that alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP) pretreatment in the presence of complexes of copper(II) 2,2′-bipyridine (Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment) is an effective method for improving the enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass, silver birch, and hybrid poplar [36, 37]. This improvement is accompanied by a decreased content of Klason lignin in pretreated biomass [36] that is associated with better enzyme accessibility to polysaccharides [38]. Similar associations have been reported for NaOH-only pretreatment [8], uncatalyzed AHP pretreatment [39], alkaline-oxidative delignification [40], and catalytic oxidative pretreatment with molecular oxygen using CuSO4 and 1,10-phenanthroline [34]. Despite the demonstrated efficacy of Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment in increasing lignin removal and enzymatic hydrolysis yields, the details of the structural and chemical modifications to the cell wall presumably responsible for these improvements remain unclear. To obtain a better understanding of the effects of Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment on both the cell walls and the pretreatment-solubilized compounds, a series of characterization techniques were employed. These included transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to investigate the structural changes in the plant cell wall and, as it turned out, to reveal the appearance of nanoscale particles within cell walls. This imaging was coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) to identify the elemental composition of these particles and verify the presence of Cu. NMR was used to structurally characterize the lignin fractions solubilized by the pretreatment as well as the residual insoluble lignin. LC–MS was employed to identify and quantify solubilized lignin-derived aromatics generated during pretreatment. Together, these data were integrated to provide insights into the Cu-catalyzed AHP process as well as the structural and chemical changes in the plant cell wall polymers that enhance enzymatic digestibility.

Results and discussion

Modifications to cell wall ultrastructure

Although uncatalyzed AHP has been shown to be quite effective at delignification, and substantially improves enzymatic hydrolysis yields of monomeric sugars for corn stover, it has minimal effect on hardwoods [41]. For example, uncatalyzed AHP pretreatment of hybrid poplar, using H2O2 loadings in the range of 125–500 mg/g biomass, results in only 10–36 % lignin removal and 18–30 % hydrolysis yields [36, 39]. The addition of copper(II) 2,2′-bipyridine [Cu(bpy)] complexes during AHP pretreatment, however, significantly increases both lignin removal (by up to 40 %) and glucose hydrolysis yields (by more than 60 %), even with short pretreatment times and low H2O2 loadings [37]. This removal of lignin has obvious structural implications for the accessibility of hydrolytic enzymes to cell wall polysaccharides.

Recently, a number of approaches have been applied to relate cell wall supramolecular organization to its recalcitrance and to determine how cell wall structure is altered by pretreatment, as reviewed [42]. Notably, TEM imaging has been used to characterize corn stover cell wall structural changes associated with pretreatments by dilute acid [43], and anhydrous ammonia [44], as well as acid chlorite delignification [45]. TEM micrographs of untreated hybrid poplar (Fig. 1a) and AHP-only pretreated hybrid poplar (Fig. 1b, c) showed identifiable features of the cell walls comprising wall layers that include secondary cell wall layers (S1 and S2) and the compound middle lamella (CML) as well as cell corners (CC) and individual lumens. The dark black stripes observed in the micrographs are artifacts introduced during ultramicrotome sectioning and KMnO4 staining [46]. Following uncatalyzed AHP pretreatment (Fig. 1b, c), the cell walls retained much of their structural integrity, as seen by their similarities to those of untreated cell walls. The only notable changes were that dislocations formed between the middle lamellae and the primary cell walls, possibly due to removal of some lignin and pectic polysaccharides during pretreatment [36, 39].
Fig. 1

TEM micrographs of cross sections of a untreated and b, c AHP-only pretreated hybrid poplar cell wall. The micrographs in b and c exhibit some dislocations between and within cell walls as a consequence of AHP pretreatment.

Addition of Cu(bpy) complexes during AHP pretreatment of hybrid poplar improved delignification and enzymatic hydrolysis yields [36]. TEM imaging showed that significant cell wall structural changes had occurred (Fig. 2). One obvious change was the major dislocations in the cell wall, examples of which are shown in Fig. 2a, and the formation of fractures in which the secondary cell wall layers were perturbed. Fractures and disruptions were also observed in other lignin-rich regions including cell corners and compound middle lamellae, suggesting that the structural changes may be caused by lignin modification and/or removal. Plant cell wall imaging following dilute acid [43] and anhydrous ammonia [44] pretreatments of delignified wood pulps [47], and following acid chlorite for delignified corn stover [45], has shown both dislocations and delaminations within the secondary cell wall.
Fig. 2

TEM characterization of hybrid poplar cell wall after Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment demonstrating a delamination and b dislocations of cell wall layers along with accumulation of nanoparticles in disrupted regions (c, d).

Lignin removal from the cell wall can be achieved through relocalization by a combination of solvent and temperature [44, 48], or through low- [45] or high-temperature delignification [49]. An important consideration for Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment is that it was performed at 25–30 °C, temperatures well below the lignin glass transition (100–170 °C) [50]. As a consequence, the lignin removal we observed is primarily due to chemical modification and/or solvent effects rather than thermal effects. We also observed that electron-opaque particles with diameters in the range of 20–100 nm were often co-localized with the modified regions of cell walls (Fig. 2c, d). These particles were not found in untreated hybrid poplar or AHP-pretreated poplar (Fig. 1). As such, they can be hypothesized to originate from the catalyst rather than as artifacts introduced during the TEM sample preparation. This suggests that copper is involved in the observed cell wall modification (e.g., via lignin oxidation).

Elemental profiling of pretreated cell walls

When combined with electron microscopy, in situ elemental profiling using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) can provide chemical characterization at a spatial resolution on the order of 100 nm [51]. To characterize the elemental composition of the nano-scale particles observed in the TEM images, EDS spectra were acquired at different locations in a TEM sample (Fig. 3a), including at a cell corner (identified as area i in Fig. 3a), within a secondary cell wall (area ii), and over the previously described particles (areas iii, iv). TEM images at high magnification show that these particles are aggregates with dendritic structures and diameters on the order of 50 nm (Fig. 3b). A comparison of the EDS spectra reveals both similarities and differences in elemental composition of the cell wall regions (Fig. 3c–f). Mn peaks are apparent in all four spectra and are a consequence of the permanganate staining, whereas the Au peaks correspond to the X-ray emissions from the grid that supports the TEM sample. The EDS spectrum from the cell corner (area i) has a strong Ca L-edge peak indicating the presence of Ca ions that are known to complex with pectin [52]. Ca K-edge peaks (3.7 keV) are also present at a lower relative abundance in the spectra of the other cell areas. For areas ii and iii where electron-opaque particles were analyzed, the EDS spectra feature characteristic peaks for Cu. The Cu L-edge and K-edge peaks are not seen in the EDS spectra of either the cell corner (area i) or the secondary cell wall (area ii). EELS was used to identify the oxidation state of the Cu-containing particles (Additional file 1: Figure S1), which shows the spectrum of a Cu-containing particle with the pre-edge background subtracted. The white-line intensity (i.e., the sharp threshold peaks) of the Cu L2,3 edge indicates that the majority of the Cu is in the Cu(I) oxidation state, while the relatively low white-line intensity of L3 implies that Cu(0) is also present.
Fig. 3

TEM micrographs of hybrid poplar cell wall (a) and high-resolution image of an electron-opaque aggregate (b) together with acquired X-ray EDS spectra of select regions within this sample (cf).

The identification of Cu-containing particles suggests that the Cu catalyst is localized in the cell wall matrix at sites corresponding to those with significant structural modification. One compelling interpretation of this result is that the soluble Cu catalysts diffuse into the porous cell wall matrix during pretreatment and subsequently catalyze the formation of localized reactive oxygen species that may be involved in the oxidative delignification and structural modification of the cell wall in their vicinity. Although the active catalytic complexes have not yet been identified, one possibility is that the oxidation reactions are accelerated by Cu complexes that catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 [53] and/or activate H2O2 via the formation of Cu-peroxide complexes [54].

Whether the formation of the Cu-containing particles occurs during pretreatment or sample preparation is still unknown. A number of scenarios can explain the results. The solubility and speciation of the Cu(bpy) complexes are a function of pH, concentration, and ligand to metal ratio [55], with Cu(bpy) complexes being substantially more soluble at the alkaline pH where pretreatment occurs. As a consequence, Cu-containing particles may precipitate at the neutral pH where sample fixation is performed. Another possibility is that the observed Cu-containing particles provide indirect evidence of catalytic activity as the soluble Cu(bpy) complexes are reduced from Cu(II) to the observed Cu(I) and Cu(0) oxidation states during the pretreatment process and are subsequently deposited as insoluble aggregate particles. Whether these particles are catalytically active or inactive remains to be determined. Furthermore, the reduction of Cu(II) by the incident electrons during TEM imaging cannot be ruled out.

Characterization of solubilized cell wall biopolymers and phenolic monomers

Our previous work demonstrated that a significant fraction of the lignin can be removed from the cell wall during Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment [36]. This delignification could result from depolymerization (which would increase the phenolic hydroxyl content and the solubility of the lignin in alkali) [56], oxidation of the lignin (which in many cases increases the hydrophilicity of the lignin), or a combination of the two processes. Cell wall biopolymer structural changes associated with this pretreatment were assessed using multiple analytical approaches. In the first approach, the relative abundance and molecular weight distributions of the lignin solubilized during pretreatment were determined by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) as a function of pretreatment time (Fig. 4). A single large peak representing phenolic monomers and oligomers eluted below an apparent molecular weight of 1,000 Da. The clear trend from these elution profiles is that Cu-catalyzed AHP releases significantly more soluble lignin fragments than uncatalyzed AHP pretreatment, supporting our previous findings that lignin solubilization during the pretreatment results in increased enzymatic hydrolysis yields [37]. It should be noted, however, that carbonyl functional groups on oxidized lignins may also strongly absorb at 280 nm and result in differing response factors for lignins with differing levels of oxidation. Another key observation is that the molecular weight distributions of the solubilized lignins are not noticeably altered for either of the pretreatments over time (Fig. 4), indicating that soluble lignins are neither undergoing substantial depolymerization, nor repolymerization through condensation reactions.
Fig. 4

SEC elution profiles for plant cell wall polymers solubilized during pretreatments referenced to elution times for polystyrene standards. For reference, the phenolic monomers vanillin, vanillic acid, syringaldehyde, syringic acid, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid elute at elution volumes between 9.1 and 9.35 mL.

The distribution and abundance of the phenolic monomers solubilized following pretreatment were quantitated by LC–MS and HPLC. These monomers arise primarily through the cleavage of ether bonds or by saponification of phenolic acids that acylate the lignin polymer. The distribution of phenolic monomers was found to be substantially different when the Cu catalyst was present, with aldehyde products favored over acids (Fig. 5a). This quantitative difference between the release of phenolic acids and aldehydes suggests that the Cu-catalyzed reaction may utilize a different reaction mechanism that results in less oxidation of the lignin polymer, yet yields more intra-lignin bond cleavage and lignin solubilization than uncatalyzed AHP. Another important result is that phenolic monomer yields reach only 2 mg/g lignin (i.e., mass of monomer to mass of cell wall lignin) for both AHP-only and Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment, and only 0.5 mg/g lignin by alkali-only pretreatment (Fig. 5a). In contrast, the complete scission of β–O–4-bonds is expected to generate maximum phenolic monomer yields ranging up to 50 % or more depending on properties such as the syringyl/guaiacyl (S/G) ratio and whether the lignins have undergone extensive condensation during processing or extraction [41, 5760]. Thus, our results suggest that the cleavage of β–O–4-bonds is far from complete.
Fig. 5

Yields of a phenolic acids and aldehydes (excluding p-hydroxybenzoate) and b p-hydroxybenzoate following alkali-only, AHP, and Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment.

Plants within the family Salicaceae, including the genus Populus, are known to have lignins with p-hydroxybenzoate groups acylating the γ-OH of syringyl subunits [61, 62]. As expected, the most abundant phenolic monomer in all of the pretreatment liquors was p-hydroxybenzoate (Fig. 5b), as these esters are easily saponified during alkaline pretreatments. The results show that alkali-only treatment results in the highest yields (14.8 mg/g lignin) with AHP-only and Cu(bpy)-AHP releasing roughly one-third or one half of this quantity. The lower yields following the oxidative treatments are presumably due to the lower pHs during these treatments (due to the acidic contribution of H2O2) that may result in incomplete saponification of the p-hydroxybenzoate, although oxidative degradation/modification may also contribute to this difference.

2D HSQC NMR of whole cell walls and solubilized lignins

We used 2D HSQC (heteronuclear single-quantum coherence) NMR spectroscopy to analyze lignin after Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment. NMR characterization was performed on untreated whole cell wall material from hybrid poplar (Fig. 6a), the lignin that was solubilized following 1 h of catalytic pretreatment and recovered via acid precipitation (Fig. 6b), and the residual insoluble cell wall material following pretreatment (Fig. 6c). Several important insights can be gained from these experiments. First, the NMR data provide evidence for lignin oxidation. The aromatic region of the pretreatment-solubilized lignin (Fig. 6b, lower panel) revealed a substantial increase in oxidized S and G units to their benzylic ketone analogues S′ and G′ plus new vanillate units (VA). The aliphatic region (Fig. 6b, upper panel) further supports these chemical changes. Although most of the correlations corresponding to β-ether units in the aliphatic region remained intact, correlations for the corresponding oxidized analogues A′ provide further evidence of benzylic oxidation. Whether this oxidation occurred prior to or following lignin solubilization cannot be established. Currently, we do not know how other lignin structures such as β–5-linked units (phenylcoumaran), and β–β-linked (resinol) units (structures B and C in Fig. 6) react, but such structures obviously remain intact in this fraction. We also noted that cinnamaldehyde end groups (X1) are completely absent from the oxidized lignin samples, whereas benzaldehyde end groups (X2) remain. Monomeric and oligomeric fragments with aryl-aldehyde and aryl-acid structures have been identified in milled wood lignins following catalytic oxidation [60], and also in lignosulfonates [63, 64]. Although the aromatic ring is inactivated toward oxidation due to carbonyl conjugation [65], the aryl α-carbonyl is susceptible to nucleophilic attack by hydroxyl groups followed by cleavage of the side-chain Cα–Cβ bond [60, 66]. Such cleavage will decrease the molecular weight of polymeric lignin and create hydrophilic lignin fragments with benzoate and benzaldehyde end-groups, consistent with the MS data (Fig. 5a). A second important insight is that lignin depolymerization is not extensive for pretreatment by Cu-catalyzed AHP. Using peak integrations as described previously [67], it can be observed that the β–O–4, β–5 and β–β linkages are still present in both the solubilized lignin (Fig. 6b) and in the residual pretreatment-insoluble lignin (Fig. 6a) in approximately the same ratio as in the native lignin. Together with the low yields of aromatic monomers observed in LC–MS (Fig. 5a) and the SEC studies that reveal an increase in solubilized lignins without a noticeable shift in the molecular weight distributions (Fig. 4), these NMR results strongly support a pathway in which Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment solubilizes and removes a fraction of the cell wall-bound lignin with minimal depolymerization and minimal oxidation of the residual lignin.
Fig. 6

Partial 2D HSQC NMR spectra of a whole cell wall untreated poplar, b solubilized lignin, and c residual poplar cell walls following Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment. Contours are colored to match the structures for aromatic components.

The lignins from Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment may be a promising source of lignin for the production of value-added products if integrated into a biorefining process. Specifically, two lignin streams with distinct structural properties are generated comprising pretreatment-solubilized lignins and residual pretreatment-insoluble lignins. The solubilized lignins (Fig. 6b) showed minimal depolymerization, exhibited minor oxidative modification, and would contain soluble xylan oligosaccharides unless these are further hydrolyzed and converted. The residual, pretreatment-insoluble lignin (Fig. 6c) exhibited minimal modification as a consequence of the pretreatment with structures closely resembling native lignins (albeit requiring recovery of bipyridine). Furthermore, by controlling the pretreatment time and the oxidation stoichiometry, it might be possible to control the molecular weight and chemical properties of solubilized lignins, customizing them for the production of functional materials and fine chemicals with targeted properties.


Our previous work demonstrated that Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment of hybrid poplar at moderate chemical loadings and under mild conditions substantially improves hydrolysis yields relative to uncatalyzed AHP pretreatment. One of the primary outcomes of pretreatment is the solubilization of a fraction (less than 30 % under these reaction conditions) [36] of the cell wall-bound lignin that results in improved accessibility of cell wall carbohydrates to hydrolytic enzymes. The current work provided a number of insights into the structural changes that occur to the cell wall and cell wall biopolymers following Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment of hybrid poplar. Specifically, we demonstrated that the catalyzed pretreatment resulted in disrupted cell walls manifested by dislocations between individual cell walls as well as delaminations within cell walls and that copper-containing nanoparticles co-localized with these zones of disruption. We hypothesize that sorption of catalyst into the cell wall during pretreatment results in oxidation, solubilization, and removal of lignin resulting in observable cell wall disruptions and enhanced susceptibility to enzymatic hydrolysis. Consistent with this hypothesis, both LC–MS and NMR characterization of the solubilized lignins and the residual material following Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment revealed the presence of oxidized lignin fragments. Specifically, a fraction of the hydroxyl groups at the α-carbon in β–O–4-units were oxidized to carbonyls, and end-groups characteristic of hydrolytic cleavage of oxidized lignin side-chains were created, suggesting that depolymerization results in lignin solubilization and removal during the pretreatment. Intriguingly, whereas the pretreatment-solubilized lignins exhibited a more than threefold increase in the oxidation of the benzylic alcohol relative to native lignin (with correlation peak integrals increasing from 5 to 18 %), the extent of lignin oxidation was limited in the pretreatment-insoluble lignin, which resembled native lignins. Formation of the Cu-containing nanoparticles with oxidation states of Cu(I) and Cu(0) lower may be attributed to reduction of soluble Cu(bpy) complexes during pretreatment, although we cannot rule out the possibility that these particles are formed during sample preparation. Additionally, relative to the lignins generated during other pretreatments and/or delignification processes that are performed at elevated temperatures and often result in substantial lignin modification, the mildly oxidized lignins generated in this work retain features closely resembling native lignins and, as such, may add more value to an integrated biorefining process.


Biomass, pretreatment, and hydrolysis

Hybrid poplar (Populus nigra var. charkoviensis × caudina cv. NE-19) was grown at the University of Wisconsin Arlington Agricultural Research Station. Prior to pretreatment, a mixture of heartwood and sapwood of the 18-year-old poplar was hammer-milled to pass a 5-mm screen. Procedures for the compositional analysis and the pretreatment of the biomass were previously reported [36]. For AHP pretreatment, hybrid poplar (0.5 g) was pretreated in 5 mL aqueous aliquots of 10.0 g H2O2/L (10 % wt/wt loading) and 10.8 g NaOH/L (final pH of approximately 11.7) at 30 °C for 1 h unless otherwise noted. During the pretreatment, the samples were agitated at 180 rpm in an orbital shaker. For Cu-catalyzed AHP pretreatment, 5 mM CuSO4 and 25 mM 2,2′-bipyridine prepared as described previously [36] were included in the 5 mL aliquot during pretreatment. For alkali-only pretreatment, 0.5 g of hybrid poplar was pretreated in 5 mL aqueous aliquots of 10.8 g NaOH/L.

TEM imaging and elemental profiling of pretreated cell walls

Structural modification of hybrid poplar cell wall by pretreatment was studied using transmission electron microscope (TEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS). The conditions used for pretreatment were identical to those used to prepare SEC samples. Cell wall samples of untreated hybrid poplar and hybrid poplar treated with AHP and Cu-catalyzed AHP for 24 h were air dried and fixed in 0.1 M pH 7.0 phosphate buffer [68] containing 2.5 % (w/w) glutaraldehyde and 2.5 % (w/w) paraformaldehyde. The fixed cell wall samples were embedded in Spurr epoxy resin (Poly/Bed 812, Polysciences) and sectioned to 100 nm thickness using a PowerTome XL ultramicrotome (Boeckeler Instruments, Tucson, AZ, USA). Thin sections were placed on 150 mesh gold grids with Formvar/carbon support film (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA) and stained in 1 % aqueous solution of KMnO4 for 60 s. Samples were then rinsed with deionized water to remove excess stain. Bright field TEM micrographs and EELS spectra were acquired under a JEOL 2200FS 200 kV field emission TEM (Peabody, MA, USA) fitted with a Gatan (Warrendale, PA, USA) digital multi-scan camera. EDS spectra were acquired using an Oxford INCA system (Oxford Instruments, Abington, UK) coupled with the TEM.

Analysis or pretreatment liquors

For analysis by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) or LC–MS, pretreatment liquors at alkaline pH were filtered through a 0.22-µm mixed cellulose ester membrane filter (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). SEC analysis was performed using an Agilent 1100 HPLC equipped with an Ultrahydrogel 250 column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) as described previously [69] only using a mobile phase flowrate of 0.6 mL/min. Aqueous solutions of monodisperse sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) of known molar mass (2,000, 4,300, 6,800, 10,000, 32,000, and 77,000 Da) were used as calibration standards.

Samples for LC–MS analysis were prepared as described above for SEC analysis except that the concentrations of CuSO4 and 2,2′-bipyridine during pretreatment were 2 mM and 4 mM, respectively. For LC–MS analysis, 10 µL of undiluted pretreatment liquor sample was adjusted to pH 2.0 with formic acid and was injected into a XEVO G2SQTOF mass spectrometer in combination with a Waters Acquity UPLC system, and equipped with an ESI interface capable of operating in both positive- and negative-ion modes. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Thermo BetaBasic 100 × 2.1 mm C18 column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) maintained at 40 °C. The binary solvent gradient consisted of 0.1 % formic acid in water (solvent A) and 100 % methanol (solvent B) in the following gradient: 95 % solvent A for the first 3 min, 50 % solvent A over the next 1 min, 30 % solvent A over next 2 min, and 5 % solvent A over the final 2 min. The column was then returned to 95 % solvent A and equilibrated for 2 min prior to the next injection. A solvent delay of 2 min was used to prevent saturation of the detector with the sample solvent. The negative-ion mode mass spectrometry conditions were constant during all experiments with a voltage of −2.25 kV and a desolvation temperature of 350 °C. MassLynx software (Waters) version 4.1 was used for system control and data acquisition. The raw data acquired were processed using the TargetLynx application. Pure standards for vanillin, vanillic acid, acetovanillone, syringaldehyde, syringic acid, acetosyringone, and p-hydroxybenzoate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used to validate peak compound identification and for quantitation.

For quantitation of p-hydroxybenzoate, samples were prepared following the same procedure as that for the LC–MS analysis, but the samples were then analyzed via high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1260 LC equipped with an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm) and a diode array detector (DAD). Integration of the p-hydroxybenzoate peak at 280 nm and comparison to a standard curve was used for quantitation. A binary isocratic solvent system was utilized consisting of 80:20 solvent C to solvent D, where solvent C is acetonitrile with 0.1 % water, and solvent D is acetonitrile with 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid.

NMR analysis of whole cell walls and pretreatment-solubilized lignin

Following the pretreatment, the aqueous phase was separated from the solid phase (i.e., the insoluble portion of pretreated poplar) via filtration and the filtrate was acidified to pH 2.0 with 72 % (w/w) sulfuric acid. The precipitate from the acidified filtrate was recovered via centrifugation and washed with a large volume of aqueous sulfuric acid (pH 2.0) followed by a final washing step of resuspending and decanting the lignin sample in pH-neutral deionized water. The washed lignin precipitate was lyophilized prior to NMR analyses. The 2D HSQC NMR spectra of three types of samples (untreated hybrid poplar, recovered solubilized lignins and the insoluble portion of pretreated poplar) were acquired and analyzed as previously described by Kim et al. [70].

Untreated and pretreated samples were prepared for gel-state NMR as previously described [70]. In brief, the dried sample was pre-ground for 1 min in a Retsch MM400 mixer mill at 30 Hz, using zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) vessels (10 mL) containing ZrO2 ball bearings (2 × 10 mm). The ground material was extracted with distilled water (1 h, 3 times) and 80 % of ethanol (1 h, 3 times) with ultrasonication. The cell walls were dried and finely ball-milled using a PULVERISETTE 7 (Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) mill at 600 rpm with ZrO2 vessels (50 mL) containing with ZrO2 ball bearings (10 × 10 mm). Each sample (200 mg) was milled for 1 h 40 min in 10 min intervals with 5 min interval breaks. The ball-milled samples (50 mg of each) were transferred into 5 mm NMR tubes and gels formed using DMSO-d 6 /pyridine-d 5 (4:1, v/v, 0.5 mL) with sonication (30 min).

NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker BioSpin (Billerica, MA, USA) AVANCE 700 MHz spectrometer equipped with a cryogenically cooled 5 mm triple-resonance 1H/13C/15N TXI gradient probe with inverse geometry (1H coils closest to the sample). The central DMSO solvent peak was used as internal reference (δC 39.5, δH 2.49 ppm). The 1H–13C correlation experiment was an adiabatic HSQC experiment (Bruker standard pulse sequence ‘hsqcetgpsisp.2'; phase-sensitive gradient-edited 2D HSQC using adiabatic pulses for inversion and refocusing) [71]. HSQC experiments were carried out using the following parameters: acquired from 9 to 1 ppm in F2 (1H) with 1,200 data points (acquisition time 200 ms), 160–10 ppm in F1 (13C) with 512 increments (F1 acquisition time 13.6 ms) of 32 scans with a 1-s interscan delay; the d24 delay was set to 0.86 ms (1/8 J, J = 145 Hz). Volume integration of contours in HSQC plots used Bruker’s TopSpin 3.1 (Mac) software. Assignments of peaks from NMR spectra were based on previous publications [70, 72].



alkaline hydrogen peroxide




diode array detector


energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy


electron energy loss spectroscopy


electrospray ionization


high-performance liquid chromatography


heteronuclear single-quantum coherence


liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry


nuclear magnetic resonance


size exclusion chromatography


transmission electron microscopy


ultra performance liquid chromatography


Authors’ contributions

DBH, ELH and ZL conceived the work, ZL, DBH, ELH, AA, JR, AB, and NB wrote the manuscript and were responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the data, ZL and CHC performed the pretreatment, composition analysis and enzymatic hydrolysis, AA performed the NMR analysis, NB and AB performed the LC–MS analysis, ZL performed the TEM imaging, EDS and EELS, and ZL and AB performed the SEC analysis. All authors provided input and corrections to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.


The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Daniel Jones (MSU Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology) and the MSU Mass Spectrometry core facility for providing assistance in the analysis of aromatic monomers. This work was funded by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science DE-FC02-07ER64494). Aditya Bhalla was also supported in part by funding from the Northeast Sun Grant Initiative.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University
DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University
DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, University of Wisconsin
Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin
Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University
Division of Sustainable Process Engineering, Luleå University of Technology
College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University


  1. Dale BE (2012) Energy consumption, wealth, and biofuels: helping human beings achieve their potential. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin 6:1–3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Solomon BD (2010) Biofuels and sustainability. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185:119–134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Davison BH, Parks J, Davis MF, Donohoe BS (2013) Plant cell walls: basics of structure, chemistry, accessibility and the influence on conversion. In: Wyman CE (ed) Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals. Wiley, New York, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  4. Walton JD (1994) Deconstructing the cell wall. Plant Physiol 104:1113Google Scholar
  5. Cortright RD, Davda RR, Dumesic JA (2002) Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature 418:964–967View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW et al (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315:804–807View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaudhuri SK, Lovley DR (2003) Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat Biotechnol 21:1229–1232View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Stoklosa RJ, Hodge DB (2015) Fractionation and improved enzymatic deconstruction of hardwoods with alkaline delignification. Bioenergy Res. doi: Google Scholar
  9. Ong RG, Chundawat SP, Hodge DB, Keskar S, Dale BE (2014) Linking plant biology and pretreatment: understanding the structure and organization of the plant cell wall and interactions with cellulosic biofuel production. In: McCannMC, Buckeridge MS, Carpita NC (eds) Plants and bioenergy. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–253Google Scholar
  10. Zhang C, Lei X, Scott CT, Zhu J, Li K (2014) Comparison of dilute acid and sulfite pretreatment for enzymatic saccharification of earlywood and latewood of Douglas fir. Bioenergy Res 7:362–370View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sperry JS (2003) Evolution of water transport and xylem structure. Int J Plant Sci 164:S115–S127View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Li X, Luo X, Li K, Zhu JY, Fougere JD, Clarke K (2012) Effects of SPORL and dilute acid pretreatment on substrate morphology, cell physical and chemical wall structures, and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of lodgepole pine. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 168:1556–1567View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao J, Anderson D, Levie B (2013) Saccharification of recalcitrant biomass and integration options for lignocellulosic sugars from Catchlight Energy’s sugar process (CLE Sugar). Biotechnol Biofuels 6:10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rødsrud G, Lersch M, Sjöde A (2012) History and future of world’s most advanced biorefinery in operation. Biomass Bioenergy 46:46–59View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Stoklosa RJ, Hodge DB (2014) Integration of (hemi)-cellulosic biofuels technologies with chemical pulp production. In: Qureshi N, Hodge DB, Vertès A (eds) Biorefineries: integrated biochemical processes for liquid biofuels. Elsevier Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Pan XJ, Gilkes N, Kadla J, Pye K, Saka S, Gregg D et al (2006) Bioconversion of hybrid poplar to ethanol and co-products using an organosolv fractionation process: optimization of process yields. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:851–861View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tucker M, Farmer J, Keller F, Schell D, Nguyen Q (1998) Comparison of yellow poplar pretreatment between NREL digester and sunds hydrolyzer. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 70–72:25–35View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim Y, Mosier NS, Ladisch MR (2009) Enzymatic digestion of liquid hot water pretreated hybrid poplar. Biotechnol Prog 25:340–348View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Garrote G, Domínguez H, Parajó JC (1999) Mild autohydrolysis: an environmentally friendly technology for xylooligosaccharide production from wood. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74:1101–1109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Allen SG, Schulman D, Lichwa J, Antal MJ, Jennings E, Elander R (2001) A comparison of aqueous and dilute-acid single-temperature pretreatment of yellow poplar sawdust. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:2352–2361View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Bajpai P (2005) Environmentally benign approaches for pulp bleaching. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Dignum MJ, Kerler J, Verpoorte R (2001) Vanilla production: technological, chemical, and biosynthetic aspects. Food Rev Int 17:119–120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Fackler K, Srebotnik E, Watanabe T, Lamaipis P, Humar M, Tavzes C et al (2002) Biomimetic pulp bleaching with copper complexes and hydroperoxides. In: Viikari L, Lantto R (eds) Progress in biotechnology, vol 21. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 223–230Google Scholar
  24. Hage R, Iburg JE, Kerschner J, Koek JH, Lempers ELM, Martens RJ et al (1994) Efficient manganese catalysts for low-temperature bleaching. Nature 369:637–639View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hage R, Lienke A (2006) Applications of transition-metal catalysts to textile and wood-pulp bleaching. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:206–222View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Odermatt J, Kordsachia O, Patt R, Kühne L, Chen CL, Gratzl JS (2001) A manganese-based catalyst for alkaline peroxide bleaching. In: Argyropoulos DS (ed) Oxidative delignification chemistry, vol 785, pp 235–254Google Scholar
  27. Perng YS, Oloman CW, Watson PA, James BR (1994) Catalytic oxygen bleaching of wood pulp with metal prophyrin and phthalocyanine complexes. Tappi J 77:119–125Google Scholar
  28. Rahmawati N, Ohashi Y, Honda Y, Kuwahara M, Fackler K, Messner K et al (2005) Pulp bleaching by hydrogen peroxide activated with copper 2,2′-dipyridylamine and 4-aminopyridine complexes. Chem Eng J 112:167–171View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu C, Long X, Du J, Fu S (2013) A critical reinvestigation of the TAED-activated peroxide system for low-temperature bleaching of cotton. Carb Polym 92:249–253View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Korpi H, Lahtinen P, Sippola V, Krause O, Leskelä M, Repo T (2004) An efficient method to investigate metal–ligand combinations for oxygen bleaching. Appl Catal A 268:199–206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Rovio S, Kallioinen A, Tamminen T, Hakola M, Leskela M, Siika-Aho M (2012) Catalyzed alkaline oxidation as a wood fractionation technique. BioRes 7:756–776Google Scholar
  32. Das S, Lachenal D, Marlin N (2013) Production of pure cellulose from Kraft pulp by a totally chlorine-free process using catalyzed hydrogen peroxide. Ind Crop Prod 49:844–850View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gueneau B, Marlin N, Deronzier A, Lachenal D (2014) Pulp delignification with oxygen and copper(II)-polyimine complexes. Holzforschung 68:377–384View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hakola M, Kallioinen A, Kemell M, Lahtinen P, Lankinen E, Leskelä M et al (2010) Liberation of cellulose from the lignin cage: a catalytic pretreatment method for the production of cellulosic ethanol. ChemSusChem 3:1142–1145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Argyropoulos DS, Suchy M, Akim L (2004) Nitrogen-centered activators of peroxide-reinforced oxygen delignification. Ind Chem Eng Res 43:1200–1205View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Li Z, Chen CH, Liu T, Mathrubootham V, Hegg EL, Hodge DB (2013) Catalysis with CuII(bpy) improves alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 110(1078–1086):37Google Scholar
  37. Li Z, Chen C, Hegg E, Hodge DB (2013) Rapid and effective oxidative pretreatment of woody biomass at mild reaction conditions and low oxidant loadings. Biotechnol Biofuel 6:119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Chang V, Holtzapple M (2000) Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:5–37View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Li M, Pattathil S, Hahn MG, Hodge DB (2014) Identification of features associated with plant cell wall recalcitrance to pretreatment by alkaline hydrogen peroxide in diverse bioenergy feedstocks using glycome profiling. RSC Adv 4:17282–17292View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruffell J, Levie B, Helle S, Duff S (2010) Pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of recovered fibre for ethanol production. Biores Technol 101:2267–2272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Li M, Foster C, Kelkar S, Pu YQ, Holmes D, Ragauskas A et al (2012) Structural characterization of alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreated grasses exhibiting diverse lignin phenotypes. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Foston M, Ragauskas A (2012) Biomass characterization: recent progress in understanding biomass recalcitrance. Ind Biotechnol 8:191–208View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Donohoe BS, Vinzant TB, Elander RT, Pallapolu VR, Lee YY, Garlock RJ et al (2011) Surface and ultrastructural characterization of raw and pretreated switchgrass. Biores Technol 102:11097–11104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Chundawat SP, Donohoe BS, da Costa Sousa L, Elder T, Agarwal UP, Lu F et al (2011) Multi-scale visualization and characterization of lignocellulosic plant cell wall deconstruction during thermochemical pretreatment. Energ Environ Sci 4:973–984View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ding S-Y, Liu Y-S, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Baker JO, Bayer EA (2012) How does plant cell wall nanoscale architecture correlate with enzymatic digestibility? Science 338:1055–1060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Fromm J, Rockel B, Lautner S, Windeisen E, Wanner G (2003) Lignin distribution in wood cell walls determined by TEM and backscattered SEM techniques. J Struct Biol 143:77–84View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Fahlén J, Salmén L (2005) Pore and matrix distribution in the fiber wall revealed by atomic force microscopy and image analysis. Biomacromolecules 6:433–438View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Donohoe BS, Decker SR, Tucker MP, Himmel ME, Vinzant TB (2008) Visualizing lignin coalescence and migration through maize cell walls following thermochemical pretreatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:913–925View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Donaldson L (2011) Delamination of Wood at the Microscopic Scale: current knowledge and methods. In: Bucur V (ed) Delamination in wood, wood products and wood-based composites. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 123–144Google Scholar
  50. Irvine GM (1985) The significance of the glass transition of lignin in thermomechanical pulping. Wood Sci Technol 19:139–149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Lin HC, Ohuchi T, Murase Y, Shiah TC, Gu LT, Lee MJ et al (2006) Application of TGA and EDX analysis to evaluate the process of preservative-treated woods. J Fac Agr Kyushu U 51:337–344Google Scholar
  52. Jauneau A, Quentin M, Driouich A (1997) Micro-heterogeneity of pectins and calcium distribution in the epidermal and cortical parenchyma cell walls of flax hypocotyl. Protoplasma 198:9–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Goldstein S, Czapski G (1985) Kinetics of oxidation of cuprous complexes of substituted phenanthroline and 2,2′-bipyridyl by molecular oxygen and by hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution. Inorg Chem 24:1087–1092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Sigel H, Flierl C, Griesser R (1969) Metal ions and hydrogen peroxide. XX. On the kinetics and mechanism of the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, catalyzed by the Cu2+-2,2′-bipyridyl complex. J Am Chem Soc 91:1061–1064View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Barnett SM, Goldberg KI, Mayer JM (2012) A soluble copper–bipyridine water-oxidation electrocatalyst. Nat Chem 4:498–502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Lapierre C, Jouin D, Monties B (1989) On the molecular origin of the alkali solubility of Gramineae lignins. Phytochem 28:1401–1403View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Robinson AR, Mansfield SD (2009) Rapid analysis of poplar lignin monomer composition by a streamlined thioacidolysis procedure and near-infrared reflectance-based prediction modeling. Plant J 58:706–714View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Werhan H, Mir JM, Voitl T, Rudolf von Rohr P (2011) Acidic oxidation of kraft lignin into aromatic monomers catalyzed by transition metal salts. Holzforschung 65:703–709View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Zakzeski J, Jongerius AL, Weckhuysen BM (2010) Transition metal catalyzed oxidation of Alcell lignin, soda lignin, and lignin model compounds in ionic liquids. Green Chem 12:1225–1236View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Azarpira A, Ralph J, Lu F (2014) Catalytic alkaline oxidation of lignin and its model compounds: a pathway to aromatic biochemicals. Bioenergy Res 7:78–86View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Rencoret J, Ralph J, Marques G, Gutiérrez A, Martínez AT, del Río JC (2013) Structural characterization of lignin isolated from coconut (Cocos nucifera) coir fibers. J Agric Food Chem 61:2434–2445View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Lu F, Karlen SD, Regner M, Kim H, Ralph SA, Sun R-C et al (2015) Naturally p-hydroxybenzoylated lignins in palms. Bioenergy Res. doi: Google Scholar
  63. Pacek AW, Ding P, Garrett M, Sheldrake G, Nienow AW (2013) Catalytic conversion of sodium lignosulfonate to vanillin: engineering aspects. Part 1. Effects of processing conditions on vanillin yield and selectivity. Ind Chem Eng Res 52:8361–8372View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Santos SG, Marques AP, Lima DLD, Evtuguin DV, Esteves VI (2011) Kinetics of eucalypt lignosulfonate oxidation to aromatic aldehydes by oxygen in alkaline medium. Ind Chem Eng Res 50:291–298View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Kirk TK, Farrell RL (1987) Enzymatic “combustion”: the microbial degradation of lignin. Annu Rev Microbiol 41:465–501View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Omori S, Dence CW (1981) The reactions of alkaline hydrogen-peroxide with lignin model dimers. 2. Guaiacylglycerol-beta-guaiacyl ether. Wood Sci Technol 15:113–123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Mansfield SD, Kim H, Lu F, Ralph J (2012) Whole plant cell wall characterization using solution-state 2D NMR. Nat Protoc 7:1579–1589View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Marttila S, Santén K (2007) Practical aspects of immunomicroscopy on plant material. In: Méndez-Vilas A, Díaz D (eds) Modern research and educational topics in microscopy. Formatex, Badajoz, pp 1015–1021Google Scholar
  69. Stoklosa RJ, Hodge DB (2012) Extraction, recovery, and characterization of hardwood and grass hemicelluloses for integration into biorefining processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:11045–11053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Kim H, Ralph J, Akiyama T (2008) Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d6. Bioenergy Res 1:56–66View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Kupče E, Freeman R (2007) Compensated adiabatic inversion pulses: broadband INEPT and HSQC. J Magn Reson 187:258–265View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Kim H, Ralph J (2010) Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d6/pyridine-d5. Org Biomol Chem 8:576–591View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Li et al. 2015