Open Access

Low oxygen levels contribute to improve photohydrogen production in mixotrophic non-stressed Chlamydomonas cultures

  • Jose Luis Jurado-Oller1,
  • Alexandra Dubini2,
  • Aurora Galván1,
  • Emilio Fernández1 and
  • David González-Ballester1Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels20158:149

Received: 30 April 2015

Accepted: 10 September 2015

Published: 17 September 2015



Currently, hydrogen fuel is derived mainly from fossil fuels, but there is an increasing interest in clean and sustainable technologies for hydrogen production. In this context, the ability of some photosynthetic microorganisms, particularly cyanobacteria and microalgae, to produce hydrogen is a promising alternative for renewable, clean-energy production. Among a diverse array of photosynthetic microorganisms able to produce hydrogen, the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is the model organism widely used to study hydrogen production. Despite the well-known fact that acetate-containing medium enhances hydrogen production in this algae, little is known about the precise role of acetate during this process.


We have examined several physiological aspects related to acetate assimilation in the context of hydrogen production metabolism. Measurements of oxygen and CO2 levels, acetate uptake, and cell growth were performed under different light conditions, and oxygenic regimes. We show that oxygen and light intensity levels control acetate assimilation and modulate hydrogen production. We also demonstrate that the determination of the contribution of the PSII-dependent hydrogen production pathway in mixotrophic cultures, using the photosynthetic inhibitor DCMU, can lead to dissimilar results when used under various oxygenic regimes. The level of inhibition of DCMU in hydrogen production under low light seems to be linked to the acetate uptake rates. Moreover, we highlight the importance of releasing the hydrogen partial pressure to avoid an inherent inhibitory factor on the hydrogen production.


Low levels of oxygen allow for low acetate uptake rates, and paradoxically, lead to efficient and sustained production of hydrogen. Our data suggest that acetate plays an important role in the hydrogen production process, during non-stressed conditions, other than establishing anaerobiosis, and independent of starch accumulation. Potential metabolic pathways involved in hydrogen production in mixotrophic cultures are discussed. Mixotrophic nutrient-replete cultures under low light are shown to be an alternative for the simultaneous production of hydrogen and biomass.


Acetate Algae Biofuels Biomass Chlamydomonas DCMU Hydrogen Low light Oxygen


Chlamydomonas hydrogenase HYDA1 is able to catalyze hydrogen (H2) production under anaerobic conditions using protons (H+) and electrons as substrates; oxygen (O2) is a strong inhibitor of both activity and expression [1, 2]. HYDA1 is localized in the chloroplast and its physiological electron donor is the plastidic ferredoxin, PETF or FDX1 (FDX1 throughout) [35]. Three pathways for H2 production can be described in Chlamydomonas depending on the electron source and the electron transport pathway to HYDA1. With two of these pathways, the electrons come from photosynthetic electron transport, and they are termed photosystem II (PSII)-dependent and PSII-independent pathways. In the first case, the electrons come from water photolysis at the level of PSII, and O2 is generated as a by-product [68]. In the PSII-independent pathway, the electrons come from NADPH [9, 10], and reach the plastoquinone (PQ) pool via the NAD(P)H:plastoquinone oxidoreductase, NDA2 [1114]. Degradation of starch is proposed as the main source for NADPH [15, 16]. Both electrons routes connect to FDX1 prior to final electron donation to HYDA1. The third pathway mobilizes electrons from the fermentative degradation of endogenous compounds, such as pyruvate derived from starch [1619]. Fermentative H2 production is linked to the activity of the pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFR), which can donate electrons to HYDA1 via FDX1 [20].

Chlamydomonas is capable of growing photoautotrophically using light and CO2 as the sole carbon source, or mixotrophically (acetate and light), using acetate as a carbon source. The observation that in some algal species adapted to light and anaerobiosis, H2 photoproduction is enhanced by the presence of acetate in the media was discovered several decades ago [17, 2124]. These former studies established that under illumination algae can consume the acetate available in the medium and subsequently release H2 and CO2. In the dark, however, acetate has no effect on H2 production, and acetate uptake is not detected. Despite these initial studies, little has been done recently regarding the role of acetate in the production of H2 by algae in nutrient-replete media [25, 26].

In this work, we have examined the physiology of photohydrogen production in acetate-containing cultures, and we discuss the importance of controlling acetate assimilation through a fine tune of the O2 and light intensity levels for efficient and sustainable production of H2.


Acetate-containing media and low light are non-stressful conditions that elicits H2 production

Hermetically sealed vessels containing 100 ml of low cell density (10 µg chl./ml; ~3 million cells/ml) Chlamydomonas cells cultured in Tris–Acetate–Phosphate (TAP) were placed under four different light conditions (12, 22, 50 and 100 µmol photons m−2 s−1; hereafter, 12 PAR, 22 PAR, 50 PAR, and 100 PAR) and dark. In this work, we will term 12 and 22 PAR as Low Light (LL), 50 PAR as Moderate Light (ML), and 100 PAR as High Light (HL). The headspaces of the culture vessels (40 ml) were not purged, and therefore atmospheric air was present in all vessels at the beginning of the experiments. H2, CO2 and O2 accumulation in the headspace, chlorophyll content, and acetate consumption were measured daily during 10-day experiments (Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1).
Fig. 1

Determination of H2, O2, acetic acid, and CO2 levels in non-aerated cultures incubated at different light intensities. H2 (a, e), O2 (b, f) and CO2 (d, h) levels were determined for the headspaces. Acetic acid (c, g) was determined in the media. Panels a to d correspond to measurements done in TAP media, whereas panels e to h correspond to measurements done in TAP media supplemented with DCMU. Represented data are average from at least three independent experiments

Cultures incubated under LL and ML produced H2 after 24 h, at rates of 6.9, 6.0, and 3.7 ml L−1 day−1 for 12, 22, and 50 PAR, respectively (Fig. 1a). After 48 h, little or no H2 production was observed under these light intensities. Interestingly, the H2 accumulation observed under light did not reach a steady-state level, but rather a small decrease was observed after the maximal H2 accumulation was reached. The H2 decrease was most evident under the 12 PAR condition. This observation is likely due to H2 uptake activity. Cultures under 100 PAR resulted in no H2 production. Finally, dark cultures had lower initial H2-production rates relative to 12–50 PAR conditions (average less than 1 ml L−1 day−1), although production was sustained for more than 7 days. Final H2 accumulation in dark cultures, after 8 days, was similar to that obtained under LL after 24–48 h. The atmospheric levels of O2 initially present in the headspaces were totally consumed after 24 h for all conditions except 100 PAR (Fig. 1b). O2 levels in the headspace remained close to zero for 12, 22 PAR and the dark conditions over the 10 days of the experiment. However, under the 50 PAR conditions, O2 accumulation was observed in the headspace after 3 days. At 100 PAR, O2 evolved above the atmospheric level, indicating that PSII activity overtook respiration rates. Acetate uptake also showed light dependence under our experimental conditions (Fig. 1c). Under 22–100 PAR, all the acetic acid contained in the media was essentially consumed after 2–4 days. However, we observed slower acetate uptake kinetics under 12 PAR and dark conditions. After 10 days, there was still acetic acid in the media (5.3 mM and 9.5 mM for 12 PAR and dark, respectively). CO2 quickly accumulated after 24 h in all tested conditions except 100 PAR (Fig. 1d). The media pH remained stable over the 10 days (7.5–7.8). Finally, the chlorophyll concentration increased significantly under 22–100 PAR, whereas there was very little or no increase at 12 PAR and in the dark, respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A).

These data indicate that acetate-containing cultures grown under ≤50 PAR and moderately low cell density can rapidly consume O2 from the headspaces (for a 100:40 medium: headspace v/v ratio), reaching anaerobiosis and producing H2 after 24 h. Maximal H2 production rates were inversely correlated with light intensities. However, dark cultures did not experience a rapid H2-production phase but rather a slow, continued, and sustained level of H2 production. This indicates that light is crucial to induce the rapid H2 production kinetics observed under LL and ML.

Aerations of cultures can double H2 photoproduction

The same experimental conditions described above were also used to monitoring H2 production in aerated vessels. Aeration was performed by opening the caps of the vessels for 5 min, in a sterile atmosphere, every 24 h. H2, CO2 and O2 accumulation in the headspace, acetate consumption, and chlorophyll content were measured daily before aeration during 10-day experiments (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Fig. S1). H2 and CO2 levels are plotted as total production, whereas O2 levels are plotted as daily measurements. Chlorophyll increased steadily with the intensity of light (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), whereas no changes were observed for pH, which was around 7.6–7.8.
Fig. 2

Determination of H2, O2, acetic acid, and CO2 levels in aerated cultures at different light intensities. H2 (a, e), O2 (b, f) and CO2 (d, h) levels were determined for the headspaces. Acetic acid (c, g) was determined in the media. Panels a to d correspond to measurements done in TAP media, whereas panels e to h correspond to measurements done in TAP media supplemented with DCMU. Aeration was performed by simply opening the caps of the vessels for 5 min in an sterile atmosphere every 24 h. H2, O2, and CO2 accumulation in the headspace were measured daily before aeration. For H2 and CO2, the accumulative productions were plotted. O2 levels are plotted as daily measurements. Represented data are average from at least three independent experiments

The H2 production in aerated cultures under LL was 2.4 times higher than in non-aerated cultures under the same light conditions (Figs. 2a vs 1a). For cultures under 50 PAR and dark, the aeration either slightly increased or reduced H2 production, respectively, relative to non-aerated cultures. Under LL, unlike the non-aerated vessels, H2 production was sustained for 3 days. Afterwards, very little H2 production was observed. For LL grown cultures, atmospheric levels of O2 entering in the vessels daily were completely consumed during the first 3 days (Fig. 2b). By the 4th day, increased levels of O2 were detected in the headspace indicating that the O2 consumption rates were progressively decreasing. Similar results were observed for cultures under 50 PAR, although appearance of O2 in the headspaces was detected earlier as the light intensity was increased. For all light intensities, except darkness, headspace O2 accumulation exceeded the initial O2 atmospheric levels, indicating net O2 photoproduction (Fig. 2b). Unlike the non-aerated cultures, all the acetate initially contained in the media was eventually consumed in the aerated cultures under all the conditions tested (Fig. 2c). More specifically, in the light, acetic acid was consumed after 2–3 days. We observed a strong correlation among the H2 production, the level of O2 in the headspace, and the consumption of acetate, indicating that these three processes are closely interconnected. H2 was produced as long as acetate was present in the media. Once acetate was consumed, O2 was accumulated and H2 production ceased. The higher the light intensity, the faster the acetate was consumed, the faster O2 accumulated in the headspace, and the faster H2 production ceased. Notably, increasing the light intensity not only reduced the length of the H2-production phase but also reduced the daily H2-production rates (e.g., 5 ml L−1 day−1 for 12PAR vs 2.6 ml L−1 day−1 for 50 PAR). However, in the dark, H2 production dropped drastically reinforcing the idea that light is crucial for the H2 production rates observed in the light. CO2 production was significantly higher for all the conditions tested when comparing to non-aerated cultures (Figs. 2d vs 1d).

Release of H2 partial pressure highly promotes H2 production in mixotrophic LL cultures

Two possibilities might explain the higher H2 accumulation observed in aerated cultures relative to non-aerated cultures: (1) the increased acetic acid uptake observed in aerated cultures may result in higher H2 production, or (2) release of the H2 partial pressure from the headspace may favor the equilibrium displacement of the reversible reaction catalyzed by hydrogenases toward H2 production and preventing H2 uptake [27]. When the headspaces of 12 PAR grown cultures were N2-purged daily, H2-production rates during the first 3 days were similar to those observed in aerated cultures (Fig. 3a). However, N2-purged cultures kept producing H2 for 10 days, while aerated cultures stopped producing H2 by the 4th day (Fig. 3b). Total H2 production over the 10 days in the purged cultures was 1.4 times higher than in aerated cultures. Interestingly, acetate uptake in purged cultures was severely impaired compared to aerated cultures (Fig. 3b). Purged cultures consumed only around 7 mM of acetic acid but produced more H2 than aerated cultures, which consumed all the acetate initially present in the media (17.4 mM). These data indicate that enhanced H2 production under aeration is mainly due to partial H2 pressure release and not to the increased acetate uptake rates.
Fig. 3

Determination of H2 (a) and acetic acid (b) on daily N2-purged cultures under 12 PAR and in the dark. Cultures incubated under 12 PAR, 12 PAR + DCMU and in the dark were purged daily for 5 min with N2 gas. For comparison purposes, aerated and non-aerated 12 PAR culture conditions are also included in the graphic. Other details are as in Fig. 2. Represented data are average from at least three independent experiments

To further test which of the two initial hypotheses were true, we added to non-aerated cultures pure O2 daily to the headspaces at atmospheric levels using a syringe (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). Cultures remained hermetically sealed for 9 days without releasing the H2 partial pressure. The results showed high acetate uptake rates, but this did not improve H2 production, which was similar to that obtained for non-aerated cultures. O2 from the headspaces was consumed for 4 days; after 5 days, O2 started to accumulate. This indicates that despite the fact that cultures reached anoxia for 4 days and that acetate was totally consumed, the H2 partial pressure in the headspaces blocked further H2 production.

Acetic acid and O2 supplementation leads to sustained H2 production under LL conditions

Cultures were subjected to identical experimental conditions described for aerated cultures for 4 days. After 4 days, cultures consumed most of the initial acetate (17.4 mM) contained in the media and did not significantly produce H2 afterwards (Fig. 2a). The addition of extra acetic acid (8.7 mM final concentration) on the 4th day promoted a second boost of H2 production under all light conditions except on cultures kept in the dark (Fig. 4a). After acetic acid supplementation, H2 production was sustained for another one (50 PAR) or two (12 and 22 PAR) days before ceasing again. Addition of a second dose of acetic acid on the 7th day (once H2 production stopped and acetate was consumed again) promoted a 3rd H2-production boost. Supplementation with acetic acid did not significantly change the pH of the media over the 10 days of the experiment, which remains about 7.5–7.8. In agreement with our previous data, LL grown cultures produced more H2 than 50PAR cultures. At 12 PAR, the maximal H2 production rate was 21.2 ml per day, and net total accumulation was 14.9 and 4.0 times higher compared to non-aerated and aerated without supplementation cultures, respectively. Similar to aerated cultures, we observed a good correlation between H2 production, acetate uptake, and O2 consumption in the headspace (Fig. 4a–c). Addition of extra acetic acid to the medium increased CO2 production under all conditions tested, compared to non-supplemented cultures (Figs. 4d vs 2d). Supplementation with acetic acid without performing aeration resulted in cell death (data not shown). This is likely due to the low acetic acid uptake observed in the absence of O2 (see below section), which in turn results in acidification of the media (pHs of the dead cultures were of 5.6). Overall, the data showed that H2 production can be sustained in fed-batch type bioreactors under LL with both aeration and acetic acid supplementation.
Fig. 4

Determination of H2, O2, CO2, and acetic acid in aerated cultures supplemented with acetic acid at different light intensities. H2 (a, e), O2 (b, f) and CO2 (d) levels were determined for the headspaces. Acetic acid (c, g) was determined in the media. Panels a to d correspond to measurements done in TAP media supplemented with acetic acid (8.5 mM), whereas panels e to f correspond to measurements done in TAP media supplemented simultaneously with acetic acid (8.5 mM) and DCMU. Acetic acid and DCMU supplementations were done on days 4 and 7 (indicated with a gray dashed line). Other details are as in Fig. 2. Represented data are average from at least three independent experiments

Acetate uptake depends on O2 availability. The inhibitory effect of DCMU on H2 production under LL is linked to O2 availability and impairment of acetate uptake

To determine the role of PSII activity in the observed H2 production under our experimental conditions, DCMU was added to the cultures.

The addition of DCMU to the non-aerated cultures incubated under 12–50 PAR produced a substantial reduction of H2 accumulation compared to the cultures containing no DCMU (78.8–69.5 % reduction at 24 h) (Fig. 1e vs a). We also observed an impairment in acetate uptake in non-aerated cultures treated with DCMU under all light intensities; the acetate concentration initially dropped but no significant acetate uptake was observed after 24–48 h (Fig. 1g). Interestingly, in aerated cultures, this reduction in H2 production when using DCMU (Fig. 2e) was significantly smaller than the one obtained for non-aerated cultures (e.g., 19.2 and 40.1 % at 12 and 22 PAR, respectively). Moreover, addition of DCMU to aerated cultures caused a much lower inhibition of the acetate uptake than in non-aerated cultures with DCMU (Figs. 2g vs 1g). Indeed, acetate was totally consumed in aerated cultures with DCMU after 4–5 days, while in non-aerated cultures, about 10 mM of acetate remained in the media after 10 days. When daily purged cultures under 12 PAR were supplemented with DCMU, both acetate uptake and H2 production dropped severely (Fig. 3). DCMU caused a 64 % inhibition of H2 production, and acetic acid uptake was practically inexistent. The effects of DCMU on H2 production and acetate uptake in purged cultures resemble the observed in non-aerated cultures. Finally, simultaneous addition of both acetic acid and DCMU on the 4th and 7th days in aerated cultures resulted in partial inhibition of H2 production (e.g., 21.5 % reduction for 12 PAR) relative to cultures supplemented with acetic acid but without DCMU (Fig. 4e vs a). However, acetate uptake was not significantly affected in these cultures (Fig. 4g vs c). These data are very similar to those obtained with aerated cultures without extra acetic acid supplementation.

Two main conclusions can be obtained from these data. First, we show that acetate uptake depends on the availability of O2. In the presence of DCMU, daily aeration of the cultures can supply the O2 needed to consume all the acetate from the media (Fig. 2g), whereas in non-aerated or purged vessels with DCMU, the lack of O2 inhibits acetate uptake (Fig. 1g). The initial drop in the acetate levels observed in non-aerated cultures containing DCMU after 24–48 h is likely due to the initial presence of O2 in the non-purged headspace; as O2 level decreased, no more acetate was consumed (Fig. 1g). Moreover, acetate uptake does not depend on the PSII activity per se. However, indirectly, the PSII activity contributes providing O2. This can be observed in non-aerated and aerated cultures without DCMU (Figs. 1c, 2c): daily aeration of the cultures can supply the O2 needed to consume all the acetate from the media, whereas in non-aerated vessels the PSII activity is the only source of O2 that enables acetate uptake. The light dependence of acetate uptake observed in both non-aerated and aerated cultures without DCMU can be explained by the relative activity of the PSII and the availability of the photo-evolved O2. Previous observations describing acetate consumption in the light and termed as photoassimilation of acetate (or acetate photometabolism) [21, 28] must be linked, at least partially, to the photogeneration of O2 but not to the ATP availability.

Second, we demonstrate that DCMU can affect differently H2 production in LL cultures. The addition of DCMU to non-aerated and purged cultures grown under 12 PAR caused very similar effects on inhibition of H2 production (72.4 vs 64 %, respectively) (Figs. 1e, 3a) and on acetate uptake (essentially blocked) (Figs. 1g, 3b). The effect of DCMU, however, is clearly different in aerated cultures cultivated under 12 PAR (with or without supplementation with acetic and DCMU) where H2 production was only partially inhibited (nearly 20 %) (Figs. 2e, 4e) and acetate uptake was not severely impaired (Figs. 2g, 4g). Note that the degree of inhibition of the H2 production caused by DCMU correlates with the O2 availability and the rates of acetate uptake. The higher H2 inhibition was obtained when O2 availability and acetate uptake were very low.

Finally, addition of DCMU to non-aerated cultures grown under HL elicited a small H2 production (Fig. 1e). H2 production was only possible under HL when DCMU was present in the medium. The presence of this inhibitor was crucial to reach anaerobiosis under HL (Fig. 1f), unlike in the 12–50 PAR grown cultures. Similar results have been found in autotrophic sulfur-depleted cultures [29].

Mobilization of starch reserves are not linked to H2 production in acetate-containing media under LL

Starch mobilization has been proposed to contribute to H2 production in mixotrophic nutrient-replete cultures via the PSII-independent pathway [16, 17, 21]. It has been suggested that under aerobic conditions acetate would first stimulate starch accumulation, which would be later degraded under anoxic conditions and provide the PQ pool with reductive equivalents. Hence, either the starch reserves present prior the beginning of the experiments or those accumulated during the experiments might potentially contribute to H2 production under LL.

We analyzed the starch accumulation patterns in the LL cultures (Fig. 5). In non-aerated cultures, starch accumulated progressively doubling its initial concentration at the end of the 8-day experiment (Fig. 5a). Similarly, in daily purged cultures under LL, starch initially decreased after 24 h but then accumulated during 6 days reaching a steady level afterwards (Fig. 5a). In aerated cultures, an initial starch accumulation phase was observed followed by a degradation phase. We observed a good synchronization between the disappearance of acetate from the media (Fig. 2c) and the starch degradation phase in aerated cultures under LL (Fig. 5a). The addition of DCMU to non-aerated cultures clearly impaired starch accumulation (Fig. 5b), likely reflecting the poor acetate uptake measured in these cultures (Fig. 1g). The addition of DCMU to aerated cultures had only a minor effect on the starch accumulation pattern (Fig. 5b), which is in agreement with the poor inhibition of acetate uptake observed in these cultures (Fig. 2g), and demonstrate that starch accumulation does not require PSII activity but acetate uptake.
Fig. 5

Starch evolution in aerated and non-aerated cultures under 12 PAR. Starch measurements were performed daily in cultures without DCMU (a) and with DCMU (b). Represented data are average from at least three independent experiments

Overall, we observed no correlation between starch accumulation/degradation patterns and H2 production because the starch accumulation phases correlated with the maximal H2-production rates in all cases, and there was no further H2 production when starch was degraded (e.g., aerated cultures, see Figs. 5 vs 2 and 2e).

Comparing H2 production in LL mixotrophic nutrient-replete and S-depleted cultures

H2 production under LL mixotrophic S-depleted conditions was tested using the previously described experimental conditions.

Non-aerated, S-depleted cultures at 12PAR (without purged head space) showed an initial H2-production phase resembling that obtained with S-replete cultures. After 7 days, a second H2-production boost was observed (Supplemental Fig. 3a). While the first H2-production boost might share similar physiological processes with nutrient-replete cultures, the second H2 boost could be more specific to S-deprivation physiology. Interestingly, non-aerated S-depleted cultures presented higher tolerance to the inhibitory effect of the H2 partial pressure than nutrient-replete cultures. Maximal H2 accumulation in non-aerated S-depleted cultures (13.7 ml L−1) was 2 times higher than in non-aerated S-replete cultures (6.9 ml L−1), but similar to the production obtained in aerated S-replete cultures (16.4 ml L−1) (Supplemental Fig. 3b). S-depleted aerated cultures produce no H2 (Additional file 3: Fig. S3B) because cells were unable to consume the O2 that daily entered in the headspaces and anaerobiosis never occurred (data not shown) revealing that O2 consumption rates in S-depleted cultures are lower than in S-replete cultures. S-depleted daily purged cultures showed H2 production rates quite similar to those of S-replete purged cultures (Additional file 3: Fig. S3C).

Overall, the results showed that although S starvation can improve H2 production in non-aerated cultures, similar levels of H2 can be obtained in S-replete, aerated cultures in a shorter period of time. Moreover, S-depleted, purged cultures did not show any significant advantage over S-replete purged cultures. Hence, under our experimental conditions, removal of S from the cultures does not contribute a significant advantage over nutrient-replete media under LL.


H2 partial pressure critically inhibits H2 production

Hydrogenases have a reversible nature and are capable of both biosynthesizing H2 and dissociating it into H+ and electrons. This latter activity is commonly known as H2 uptake. As any chemical reaction, the equilibrium between the biosynthesis and uptake of H2 depends on the concentrations of substrates and products. This would imply that H2 accumulation within bioreactors increases H2 partial pressure in the headspace, while reducing H2 biosynthetic rates to eventually cease any net hydrogenase bioproduction activity.

Inhibition of the Chlamydomonas H2 production by injection of different amounts of pure H2 in the headspaces has previously been observed by others [21, 27]. Moreover, Mignolet et al. [14] demonstrated how H2 elimination from hermetic cultures by flushing with N2 can enhance H2 production. Finally, Kosourov et al. [27] also studied the effect of different volumes of purged headspaces on H2 production in Chlamydomonas cultures under S- and phosphorous-deprivation. Here, we certainly confirm that the release of the H2 accumulated in the headspace greatly enhances H2 production, even when this release is accompanied by O2 supplementation to the cultures (Fig. 2a). Daily release of the H2 accumulated in the headspaces of the bioreactors vessels, through either aeration, or purging with N2, resulted in H2 production 2.4 and 3.4 times higher than in non-aerated cultures, respectively (Fig. 3a). In our experimental designs, release of the H2 partial pressure was executed every 24 h. Since non-aerated cultures did not evolve substantial H2 after 24 h (Fig. 1a), we conclude that under our nutrient-replete LL conditions, the equilibrium between H2 production and H2 uptake was reached before the 24-h aeration events. In fact, H2 uptake can be observed after 24 h in LL, non-aerated cultures (Fig. 1a). For dark non-aerated cultures, the equilibrium is reached after 7–8 days (Fig. 1a). However, for both non-aerated LL and dark cultures, the maximal accumulation of H2 in the headspaces reached about 1.9 % (0.76 ml H2 out of 40 ml headspace). Hence, we assume that 1.9 % is near the maximal percentage of H2 that can be accumulated under our specific experimental nutrient-replete conditions.

Interestingly, in S-depleted, non-aerated cultures (Additional file 3: Fig. S3A), the maximal H2 accumulation was higher than in non-aerated S-replete cultures and reached 3.2 % of the headspace. This could indicate that different physiological conditions can probably alter the substrates availability of the hydrogenases (H+ and electrons) exerting different equilibrium pressures towards H2 formation.

Overcoming the inhibition of H2 accumulation within bioreactors must be dealt with to optimize H2 production. Utilization of a larger gas to liquid phase ratios or ventilation systems that liberate H2 partial pressure are straightforward ways to overcome the hydrogenase reversibility. However, this may lead the production of highly diluted H2, which may in turn reduce the potential for commercial applications. Utilization of bioreactors covered with materials, such as metallacarboranes, with high reversible capacity for binding H2 at low temperatures [30] might be a way to avoid H2 uptake.

Production of both biomass and H2 is possible in non-stressed Chlamydomonas cultures

Hydrogenase sensitivity to O2 is probably the main drawback for sustained H2 photoproduction in photosynthetic organisms. Reduction of net O2 levels can be accomplished by reducing PSII activity and maintaining high rates of mitochondrial respiration. At physiological level, nutrient stresses (in the presence of acetate) are widely employed strategies to establish this condition in Chlamydomonas. Sulfur limitation is the most widely employed [6], although phosphorous [31], nitrogen [32] and magnesium [33] deficiencies have been used successfully to attain H2 production in Chlamydomonas. These approaches imply a two-stage process: first biomass is grown under aerobic conditions in nutrient-replete media, and then a H2 production phase can be induced by removing nutrients and O2 from the media. This procedure normally requires a solid–liquid separation step of biomass and culture medium after the growth phase, followed by several washing steps and O2 purging processes [6, 34, 35]. Continuous or semi-continuous regimes of cultivation [3638] or re-addition of nutrients to the medium [39] are alternatives to the solid–liquid separation steps, which extend the sustainability of H2 production. However, all these protocols normally require high-energy inputs, do not support algae biomass and H2 production simultaneously, are time-consuming and reduce culture viability.

In this work, we show an alternative straightforward methodology for H2 production in nutrient-replete media under LL. This methodology neither requires initial high cell density cultures nor the removal of nutrients from the media. Moreover, under LL and in the presence of acetate, the atmospheric O2 is totally depleted after 24 h, which makes the purging process, required in other strategies, unnecessary. Finally, H2 production can start within 24 h avoiding the typical lag phase (2–8 days) observed under nutrient-depleted cultures [15, 29, 3133]. Overall, this strategy opens up new possibilities for production of both H2 and biomass, the latter being important for further downstream biotechnological applications.

Here, we demonstrated that Chlamydomonas, nutrient-replete, mixotrophic, cultures grown under LL (<50 PAR) can reach anoxia after 24 h and produce H2, highlighting the inverse relationship between H2 production rates and light intensities. Similar results have been previously reported by Degrenne et al. [26] who studied the induction of anoxia and H2 production in mixotrophic Chlamydomonas cultures using batch and continuous mode bioreactors under different light regimes. Here, we have extended these previous studies using cultures under different light intensities and oxygenic regimes. We have described in detail how light intensity, O2 availability, acetate uptake, and H2 production are processes closely linked to each other. Here, we have shown that O2 allows acetate uptake and cell growth. Providing O2 to batch mode cultures under LL allowed us to achieve simultaneously H2 production and biomass (Fig. 2a; Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Moreover, in aerated fed-batch mode bioreactors, non-continuous supplementation with acetic acid and O2 greatly enhanced H2 production (Fig. 4a). Likely continuous mode bioreactors, with continuous supply of acetic acid and low levels of O2 (plus other basic nutrients), would allow for sustained H2 and biomass production.

In our study, maximal H2 production was obtained when cultures under 12PAR were not aerated but N2-purged daily. The purging procedure allowed prolonged H2 production (10 days in purged cultures vs 3 days in aerated cultures) (Fig. 3) with a substantial reduction of the acetate consumption, which is of interest for potential large-scale productions. However, N2-purged cultures did not grow and biomass did not increase, likely because O2 levels were too low. Optimization of these procedures must be achieved to obtain both maximal H2 and biomass production. For example, purging gases that include low concentration of O2 can be finely tuned to allow for high H2 production rates and cell growth.

Roles of acetate and oxygen in the production of H2 under LL in nutrient-replete cultures

Most of the studies related to H2 production in Chlamydomonas have been performed with S-depleted acetate-containing media [6, 10, 34, 40]. The goal of these studies, however, did not focus on identifying the role of acetate during H2 production. When autotrophic Chlamydomonas cultures are used to produce H2 in either nutrient-replete [41] or S-depleted media [29, 35, 42], H2 production is low compared with media containing acetate, which highlight the importance of acetate in the context of H2 production under these conditions. From studies using nutrient-replete and S-depleted media, it is widely assumed that acetate facilitates H2 production by helping to establish anoxia in the cultures through its oxidation via the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle (TCA) and oxidative phosphorylation [6, 17, 21, 26, 34, 43]. The addition of acetate to Chlamydomonas cultures decreases photosynthesis efficiency, net O2 evolution, and CO2 fixation, as well as promotes the transition from state I to state II and mitochondrial respiration [4447]. All these factors help to establish anoxia in sealed cultures. Repression of CO2 fixation may also contribute to H2 production by reducing the competition for electrons, for HYDA1, at the level of FDX1 [10]. In any case, the role of acetate in stimulation of H2 production in the light has not yet been carefully examined.

We have shown that acetate uptake rates are not directly proportional to H2 production rates (e.g., purged cultures vs aerated cultures, Fig. 3a, b). Indeed, the faster the acetate is consumed, the faster O2 accumulates (once acetate is depleted from the media) and the faster H2-production phase is inhibited (e.g., Fig. 2a–c). On the other hand, we have shown that acetate uptake is highly dependent on O2 availability (e.g., comparing aerated and non-aerated cultures with DCMU, Figs. 1g, 2g). Under severe anoxic conditions, such as in non-aerated cultures with DCMU or daily purged cultures with DCMU, there is no acetate uptake and H2 production is very limited (Figs. 1g, e, 3a, b). This suggests that a minimal threshold of acetate uptake is needed to support H2 production and that the role of acetate must rely on something else than just the establishment of anoxic condition. Moreover, paradoxically, O2 is a key substrate that under limiting concentrations allows acetate uptake and thereby H2 production. Acetate uptake does not directly depend on the PSII activity per se (Fig. 2g); however, PSII activity is crucial to provide O2 to hermetically sealed cultures and allow acetate uptake (e.g., Fig. 1c). Overall, our results suggest that an important aspect to be considered when producing H2 in mixotrophic Chlamydomonas cultures is that optimal H2 production does not rely on reaching very high respiration rates or establishing severe anoxic conditions but rather on sustaining relatively low acetate uptake rates under hypoxic conditions. LL is an optimal physiological condition where O2 production is high enough to allow low acetate uptake rates but low enough to prevent hydrogenase inhibition.

The H2 production observed in acetate-containing media is clearly enhanced in the light, although, under our experimental conditions, dark fermentation may contribute to about 10–20 % of the total H2 production detected at 12PAR. The stimulatory effect of light on H2 production necessarily requires an active photosynthetic electron flow that can feed electrons to HYDA1 via either the PSII-dependent or PSII-independent pathway. The inhibitory effect of DCMU on algal H2 photoproduction has frequently been used to differentiate between PSII-dependent and -independent pathways [7, 10, 48]. Previously, it was observed that the effect of DCMU on cells grown in nutrient-replete media was unclear. Some studies reveal no impact of DCMU on H2 photoproduction [49]. However, others observed substantial inhibition of both H2 production (90 %) and acetate uptake (66 %) [21, 24]. Here, we demonstrate that the addition of DCMU to nutrient-replete, acetate-containing cultures can have very different effects on both H2 production (e.g., at 12 PAR, inhibition of 72.4 % in non-aerated cultures vs 19.2 % in aerated cultures) and acetate uptake (e.g., at any light intensity, severe inhibition in non-aerated cultures vs slight inhibition in aerated cultures). The level of inhibition of H2 production by DCMU is subjected to the specific culture conditions, more specifically to O2 availability and acetate uptake. This may be problematic for determining the contribution of the PSII-dependent pathway on cells grown in media containing acetate. Experimental conditions (e.g. O2 availability, pre-culture conditions, purging processes, etc.) may affect the effect of DCMU addition on H2 production and in turn overestimate the contribution of the PSII-dependent pathway. This may partly explain some discrepancies found in the literature concerning the relative importance of this pathway. Nonetheless, we conclude that H2 production in LL mixotrophic cultures is mainly via PSII-independent pathway, since up to 80 % of the maximal H2 production can be obtained when PSII is inhibited (Figs. 2e, 4e). It has been proposed that acetate may enhance the PSII-independent H2 production pathway under nutrient-replete media by favoring the accumulation of starch during oxygenic conditions, which is degraded later during anaerobiosis [17, 24, 49, 50]. However, our data do not seem to support this possibility since we observe no correlation between starch accumulation/degradation patterns and H2 production under our experimental conditions (Figs. 3a, 5). Our data are in agreement with previous observations of starch-deficient mutants that can produce H2 under both S-replete and S-depleted conditions [10]. Alternatively, starch degradation may not be the source of reductive equivalents but rather acetate assimilation may provide the chloroplast with reductive equivalents for PSII-independent H2 photoproduction. The localization of two enzymes involved in acetate assimilation, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH), in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas, may provide this organelle with the reductive equivalents (FADH2 and NADPH, respectively) needed to feed the PQ pool [51, 52] (Fig. 6). Additionally, the oxaloacetate produced in the chloroplast from MDH can also potentially contribute to H2 production. Recently, it was shown that the pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFR) enzyme of Chlamydomonas possesses an important affinity for oxaloacetate [53], which opens up the possibility that acetate, via the glyoxylate pathway, might also be coupled to fermentative H2 production (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Tentative model for H2 production pathways in acetate-containing cultures under LL. Black dashed arrows multiple enzymatic steps. Red dashed arrow electrons flow. DCT dicarboxylate transport system, Cytb6f cytochrome b6f, HYDA1 hydrogenase 1, FDX1 ferredoxin 1, MDH malate dehydrogenase, NDA2 NAD(P)H:plastoquinone oxidoreductase 2, PFR pyruvate:ferredoxin oxido reductase, PSI photosystem I, PQ plastoquinone, SDH succinate dehydrogenase, TCA tricarboxylic acid cycle

In any case, under our experimental conditions, the potential contribution of these pathways (either PSII-independent via SDH/MDH or fermentative via PFR) needs to be necessarily linked to light-dependent reactions since dark H2 production is clearly lower than in the light. For the SDH/MDH pathway, it is easy to explain the light dependence since electron flow from the PQ pool to HYDA1 would require an active PSI. At the same time, an active PSI would promote PQ re-oxidation and would allow the turnover of FAD+ and NADP+ needed to maintain SDH and MDH activities, respectively, which in turn would provide oxaloacetate to the chloroplast, leading to high PFR rates under anoxia. Still, the relative importance, if any, of these potential pathways for H2 production in nutrient-replete acetate-containing cultures, remains to be determined appropriately.

Enzyme localization and proteomics studies have helped in identifying the acetate assimilation and dissimilation pathways, which require the participation of enzymes localized in the cytosol, the mitochondria, and the chloroplast [51, 52, 5456]. Based on these studies and on the physiological data we have provided in this study, we propose a tentative model that aims at explaining the physiology and metabolic pathways involved in H2 production in nutrient-replete, acetate-containing medium (Fig. 6). Acetate can be simultaneously routed to different pathways. Acetate can be dissimilated in the TCA cycle or assimilated by the glyoxylate cycle. The acetate entering the TCA cycle would provide energy to the cell and would contribute in maintaining low O2 levels. The glyoxylate cycle would provide succinate to the chloroplast for carbon skeletons. Chloroplastic SDH and MDH would participate in the conversion of chloroplast succinate into oxaloacetate and would provide reductive equivalents to the PQ pool. Chloroplastic oxaloacetate would either be redirected towards different biosynthetic pathways (e.g., lipids or starch biosynthesis) or used by chloroplast PFR if anoxic/hypoxic conditions are established. All these pathways occur simultaneously and their relative activities can be affected by O2 availability. Light intensity greatly affects O2 availability through PSII activity, and this O2 could be used by the TCA cycle to dissimilate acetate. If the light intensity is not too high, then the TCA cycle would be able to maintain the cells under hypoxic conditions. However, even though hypoxic conditions are established, O2 photoproduction rates would regulate the TCA cycle activity, acetate uptake rate, and cell growth. The higher these parameters, the lower would be the H2 production. Under LL, however, O2 availability is very low and so would be the TCA activity, acetate uptake rates, and ATP generation. Under this scenario, the relative importance of the glyoxylate cycle is enhanced, as well as chloroplastic SDH and MDH activities, which could provide reductive equivalents to the PQ pool. Also, due to low ATP levels, the use of oxaloacetate for biosynthetic pathways and cell growth is impaired and PFR activity is favored. All these processes would favor the H2 production under LL in acetate-containing medium. Under severe anoxic conditions, no acetate would be taken up, and H2 production would be low. Finally, in the dark, and independent of O2 availability, PSII-independent H2 production is not active, and the turnover of FADH2 and NADPH would limit oxaloacetate availability and its use by PFR.


H2 production by Chlamydomonas cultures is still far for large-scale implementations due to the low yields obtained so far. Among other limitations, the H2 partial pressure is an important limiting factor, as shown in this work. Moreover, most of the studies about H2 production on Chlamydomonas rely in the use of nutrient starved cultures, which reduces the viability of large-scale productions. The approach presented here, although also has very low H2 production yields, opens up a new possibility to the straightforward attainment of both H2 and biomass in non-stressed cultures. This could have a great biotechnological interest if current H2 production yields are sufficiently improved. Another factor limiting H2 production in algae is the O2 sensitivity of the hydrogenases. However, an intriguing conclusion of this work is that low levels of O2 can actually benefit H2 production by the means of facilitating acetate uptake in mixotrophic cultures. However, the role of acetate during the H2 photoproduction in Chlamydomonas cultures remains uncertain. We have shown that H2 production in mixotrophic cultures is mostly associated with the PSII-independent pathway (80 %), indicating that a source of reductants is needed to feed the PQ pool. However, although acetate assimilation can favor starch accumulation, we clearly demonstrate that mobilization of the starch reserves does not provide with reductants for H2 production under our experimental conditions. We discuss potential metabolic pathways that may be involved in H2 production and linked to the dissimilation/assimilation of acetate, but certainly, more studies are needed to unravel the precise mechanisms that trigger H2 production in the presence of acetate in Chlamydomonas cultures. Understanding such mechanisms could help us improving H2 production efficiency through new physiological manipulations and genetic engineering.


Alga strain and growth conditions

Chlamydomonas (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) strain 704 (cw15 arg7+ Nia1:Ars mt+) [57] was used in all the experiments. Cells were grown photomixotrophically under continuous light at 23 °C in liquid TAP medium. The initial acetic acid concentration was of 17.4 mM [58]. Algal cultures were grown to mid-log phase (10–12 × 106 cells mL−1), harvested by centrifugation (3000g for 2 min) and resuspended in fresh TAP to a final concentration of 10 μg Chl mL−1 (~3 × 106 cells mL−1). For experiments employing either TAP without S (TAP-S) or acetate free media (Minimal Media, MM) [58], cells were washed two times in the corresponding media before setting up the inductions. Cells (100 ml) were placed in a hermetically sealed vessel (140 ml) using screw caps equipped with silicon septa (GL45 PP 2 ports, GL14, Duran Group). The final headspace volume was 40 mL. The sealed vessels were placed in a growth chamber equipped with LED panels (AlgaeTron AG 230, Photon System Instruments) at 23 °C with continuous agitation (210 rpm). The following light intensities were assessed: 12, 22, 50, and 100 µE m−2 s−1. For dark inductions, the vessels were covered with aluminum foil. Where indicated, the following reagents were added to the cultures: the PSII inhibitor, DCMU (25 µM of 3-(3,4-dicholorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea in ethanol) (Sigma-Aldrich); 8.5 mM glacial acetic acid (Panreac); and 8.5 mM potassium acetate. Daily samples (1 ml) of the cultures were collected using a syringe; and they were used for starch, chlorophyll, acetate, and pH determinations.

Analysis of the gases in the head spaces of the cultures

Samples (250 µL) from the headspaces of the cultures were collected using a 1 mL Hamilton’s SampleLockTM syringe (# 81356) and manually injected into a Gas Chromatographer (GC) (Agilent 7820A, Agilent Technologies). H2, O2 and CO2 were detected using a Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD), and argon was used as the carrier gas. H2, O2, and CO2 were separated at 40 °C using a two-capillary-column system (HP-molesieve 30 m x 0.53 mm and HP-PLOT/Q 30 m × 0.53 mm, Ref. 19095P-MS6/19095P-QO4, Agilent Technologies) coupled with a pneumatic valve. Alternatively, O2 and H2 were separated using a packed column (60/80 Molecular Sieve 5A, Ref. 13133-U, Supelco) at 70 °C.

Chlorophyll, acetate, and starch measurements

Culture samples (1 mL) were taken directly from culture vessels at the indicated times, centrifuged for 2 min at 13,000 rpm, and the pellets were resuspended in methanol for chlorophyll (a + b) extraction [58]. Supernatants were stored at −20 °C separately for acetate determinations. The concentrations of chlorophylls a and b, extracted from cells in methanol, were estimated spectrophotometrically (DU 800, Beckman Coulter).

Acetic acid analysis was performed by HPLC (Agilent series 1200, Agilent Technologies) using an ion-exchange column (Agilent Hi-Plex H, 300 × 7.7 mm, 6 μm I.D.) and isocratic elution with 5 mM H2SO4 at 55 °C. Samples were thawed, centrifuged, and filtered prior to HPLC analysis. Twenty µl of cell culture supernatant was injected onto the HPLC system at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. Retention peaks were observed using a UV (205 nm) detector and recorded using Agilent ChemStation software. Quantifications were performed by comparisons with known amounts of standard

Starch extraction was performed using a version of the method of Klein and Betz [17]. One milliliter of culture was sampled, centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min, resuspended in 1 mL of methanol for chlorophyll extraction, and centrifuged again. The pellets were rinsed with 400 µL of distilled water and heated for 15 min at 120 °C for starch solubilization. Two hundred microliter of a mixture of α-amylase (A-9857, SIGMA) and amyloglucosidase (10115, SIGMA) containing 2.25 U/mL each, prepared in Na-acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 4.5), were added to the samples. The mixture reaction was incubated for 2 h at 55 °C. Finally, free glucose was measured using a BioSystems kit for glucose determination (11538, BioSystems)



high light (100 PAR)


hydrogenase 1


ferredoxin 1


low light (12-22 PAR)


Malate Dehydrogenase


moderate light (50 PAR)


NAD(P)H:plastoquinone oxidoreductase 2


photosynthetically active radiation (in µmol photons m−2s−1)


pyruvate:ferredoxin oxido Reductase




succinate dehydrogenase


tris–acetate–Phosphate medium


tricarboxylic Acid cycle


Authors’ contributions

JLJ-O and DG-B performed and designed all the experiments. JLJ-O helped in the writing of the manuscript and made the final versions of the figures. AD collected some samples, helped in designing of the experiments, in the analysis and interpretation of the data, and in the writing of the manuscript. EF and AG coordinated the study and helped in the writing of the manuscript. DG-B performed the experiments, analyzed the results, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Authors thanks Maria Ghirardi and Michael Seibert (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, CO, USA) for their critical reading of the manuscript; and Maribel Macias and Rocio Onieva (Universidad de Cordoba) for their technical support. This work was funded by the MINECO (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain, Grant no. BFU2011-29338 [granted to EF and G]), supported by the European “Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)” program, the Plan E program (CONV 188/09 [granted to EF]), the Ramon y Cajal program (RYC-2011-07671 [granted to DG-B]), the Junta de Andalucía grants (P08-CVI-04157 and BIO-502 [granted to AG and EF]), the Plan Propio de la Universidad de Cordoba (granted to EF and AG), and the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) (granted to AD).

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba
Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)


  1. Happe T, Kaminski A. Differential regulation of the Fe-hydrogenase during anaerobic adaptation in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:1022–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ghirardi ML, Togasaki RK, Seibert M. Oxygen sensitivity of algal H2-production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1997;63–65:141–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Peden EA, Boehm M, Mulder DW, Davis R, Old WM, King PW, et al. Identification of global ferredoxin interaction networks in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:35192–209.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Terauchi AM, Lu SF, Zaffagnini M, Tappa S, Hirasawa M, Tripathy JN, et al. Pattern of expression and substrate specificity of chloroplast ferredoxins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:25867–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Tagawa K, Tsujimoto HY, Arnon DI. Role of chloroplast ferredoxin in the energy conversion process of photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1963;49:567–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Melis A, Zhang L, Forestier M, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M. Sustained photobiological hydrogen gas production upon reversible inactivation of oxygen evolution in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2000;122:127–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kosourov S, Seibert M, Ghirardi ML. Effects of extracellular pH on the metabolic pathways in sulfur-deprived, H2-producing Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:146–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenbaum E, Lee JW, Tevault CV, Blankenship SL, Mets LJ. CO2 fixation and photoevolution of H2 and O2 in a mutant of Chlamydomonas lacking photosystem I. Nature. 1995;376:438–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mus F, Cournac L, Cardettini V, Caruana A, Peltier G. Inhibitor studies on non-photochemical plastoquinone reduction and H(2) photoproduction in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1708:322–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hemschemeier A, Fouchard S, Cournac L, Peltier G, Happe T. Hydrogen production by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: an elaborate interplay of electron sources and sinks. Planta. 2008;227:397–407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Baltz A, Kieu-Van D, Beyly A, Auroy P, Richaud P, Cournac L, et al. Plastidial expression of type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenase increases the reducing state of plastoquinones and hydrogen photoproduction rate by the indirect pathway in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2014;165:1344–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Desplats C, Mus F, Cuine S, Billon E, Cournac L, Peltier G. Characterization of Nda2, a plastoquinone-reducing type II NAD(P)H dehydrogenase in Chlamydomonas chloroplasts. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:4148–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jans F, Mignolet E, Houyoux P-A, Cardol P, Ghysels B, Cuine S, et al. A type II NAD(P) H dehydrogenase mediates light-independent plastoquinone reduction in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:20546–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mignolet E, Lecler R, Ghysels B, Remacle C, Franck F. Function of the chloroplastic NAD(P)H dehydrogenase Nda2 for H2 photoproduction in sulphur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biotech. 2012;162:81–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chochois V, Dauvillée D, Beyly A, Tolleter D, Cuiné S, Timpano H, et al. Hydrogen production in Chlamydomonas: photosystem II-dependent and -independent pathways differ in their requirement for starch metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:631–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gfeller RP, Gibbs M. Fermentative Metabolism of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: II. Role of Plastoquinone. Plant Physiol. 1985;77:509–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Klein U, Betz A. Fermentative Metabolism of Hydrogen-evolving Chlamydomonas moewusii. Plant Physiol. 1978;61:953–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hemschemeier A, Happe T. The exceptional photofermentative hydrogen metabolism of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:39–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mus F, Dubini A, Seibert M, Posewitz MC, Grossman AR. Anaerobic acclimation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: anoxic gene expression, hydrogenase induction, and metabolic pathways. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:25475–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. van Lis R, Baffert C, Couté Y, Nitschke W, Atteia A. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts contain a homodimeric pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase that functions with FDX1. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:57–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibbs M, Gfeller RP, Chen C. Fermentative metabolism of Chlamydomonas reinhardii: III. Photoassimilation of acetate. Plant Physiol. 1986;82:160–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Healey FP. Mechanism of hydrogen evolution by Chlamydomonas moewusii. Plant Physiol. 1970;45:153–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones LWMJ. A common link between photosynthesis and respiration in a blue green alga Nature. 1963;199:670–2.Google Scholar
  24. Bamberger ES, King D, Erbes DL, Gibbs M. H(2) and CO(2) Evolution by anaerobically adapted Chlamydomonas reinhardtii F-60. Plant Physiol. 1982;69:1268–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang H, Fan X, Zhang Y, Yang D, Guo R. Sustained photo-hydrogen production by Chlorella pyrenoidosa without sulfur depletion. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33:1345–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Degrenne B, Pruvost J, Christophe G, Cornet JF, Cogne G, Legrand J. Investigation of the combined effects of acetate and photobioreactor illuminated fraction in the induction of anoxia for hydrogen production by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35:10741–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kosourov SN, Batyrova KA, Petushkova EP, Tsygankov AA, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M. Maximizing the hydrogen photoproduction yields in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures: the effect of the H2 partial pressure. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37:8850–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pringsheim E, Wiessner W. Photo-assimilation of acetate by green organisms. Nature. 1960;188:919–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Fouchard S, Hemschemeier A, Caruana A, Pruvost J, Legrand J, Happe T, et al. Autotrophic and mixotrophic hydrogen photoproduction in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas cells. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:6199–205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Bora PL, Singh AK. New insights into designing metallacarborane based room temperature hydrogen storage media. J Chem Phys. 2013;139:164319.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Batyrova KA, Tsygankov AA, Kosourov SN. Sustained hydrogen photoproduction by phosphorus-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37:8834–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Philipps G, Happe T, Hemschemeier A. Nitrogen deprivation results in photosynthetic hydrogen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Planta. 2012;235:729–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Volgusheva A, Kukarskikh G, Krendeleva T, Rubina A, Mamedov F. Hydrogen photoproduction in green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under magnesium deprivation. RSC Advances. 2014;5:5633–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Antal TK, Krendeleva TE, Laurinavichene TV, Makarova VV, Ghirardi ML, Rubin AB, et al. The dependence of algal H2 production on Photosystem II and O2 consumption activities in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1607:153–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kosourov S, Patrusheva E, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M, Tsygankov A. A comparison of hydrogen photoproduction by sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under different growth conditions. J Biotechnol. 2007;128:776–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Laurinavichene TV, Tolstygina IV, Galiulina RR, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M, Tsygankov AA. Dilution methods to deprive Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures of sulfur for subsequent hydrogen photoproduction. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27:1245–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Fedorov AS, Kosourov S, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M. Continuous hydrogen photoproduction by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: using a novel two-stage, sulfate-limited chemostat system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005;121–124:403–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Oncel S, Vardar-Sukan F. Photo-bioproduction of hydrogen by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using a semi-continuous process regime. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:7592–602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kosourov S, Makarova V, Fedorov AS, Tsygankov A, Seibert M, Ghirardi ML. The effect of sulfur re-addition on H(2) photoproduction by sulfur-deprived green algae. Photosynth Res. 2005;85:295–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kosourov S, Tsygankov A, Seibert M, Ghirardi ML. Sustained hydrogen photoproduction by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: effects of culture parameters. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;78:731–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Degrenne B, Pruvost J, Legrand J. Effect of prolonged hypoxia in autotrophic conditions in the hydrogen production by the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in photobioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:1035–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsygankov AA, Kosourov SN, Tolstygina IV, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M. Hydrogen production by sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under photoautotrophic conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2006;31:1574–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsygankov A, Kosourova S, Seibert M, Ghirardi ML. Hydrogen photoproduction under continuous illumination by sulfur-deprived, synchronous Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27:1239–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Asada Y, Miyake J. Photobiological hydrogen production. J Biosci Bioeng. 1999;88:1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Heifetz PB, Forster B, Osmond CB, Giles LJ, Boynton JE. Effects of acetate on facultative autotrophy in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii assessed by photosynthetic measurements and stable isotope analyses. Plant Physiol. 2000;122:1439–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Endo T, Asada K. Dark induction of the non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence by acetate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell Physiol. 1996;37:551–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Gérin S, Mathy G, Franck F. Modeling the dependence of respiration and photosynthesis upon light, acetate, carbon dioxide, nitrate and ammonium in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using design of experiments and multiple regression. BMC Syst Biol 2014; 8:96.
  48. Antal TK, Matorin DN, Ilyash LV, Volgusheva AA, Osipov V, Konyuhov IV, et al. Probing of photosynthetic reactions in four phytoplanktonic algae with a PEA fluorometer. Photosynth Res. 2009;102:67–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Healey FP. Hydrogen evolution by several algae. Planta. 1970;91:220–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Maione TE, Gibbs M. Hydrogenase-mediated activities in isolated chloroplasts of Chlamydomonas reinhardii. Plant Physiol. 1986;80:360–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Willeford KO, Gibbs M. Localization of the enzymes involved in the photoevolution of H(2) from acetate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 1989;90:788–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Willeford KO, Gombos Z, Gibbs M. Evidence for chloroplastic succinate dehydrogenase participating in the chloroplastic respiratory and photosynthetic electron transport chains of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 1989;90:1084–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Noth J, Krawietz D, Hemschemeier A, Happe T. Pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase is coupled to light-independent hydrogen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:4368–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Atteia A, Adrait A, Brugiere S, Tardif M, van Lis R, Deusch O, et al. A Proteomic Survey of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mitochondria sheds new light on the metabolic plasticity of the organelle and on the nature of the alpha-proteobacterial mitochondrial ancestor. Mol Bio Evol. 2009;26:1533–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Rolland N, Atteia A, Decottignies P, Garin J, Hippler M, Kreimer G, et al. Chlamydomonas proteomics. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12:285–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Johnson X, Alric J. Central carbon metabolism and electron transport in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: metabolic constraints for carbon partitioning between oil and starch. Eukaryot Cell. 2013;12:776–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Loppes R, Radoux M, Ohresser MC, Matagne RF. Transcriptional regulation of the Nia1 gene encoding nitrate reductase in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: effects of various environmental factors on the expression of a reporter gene under the control of the Nia1 promoter. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;41:701–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Harris EH. The Chlamydomonas sourcebook. A comprehensive guide to biology and laboratory use. San Diego: Academic Press; 1989.Google Scholar


© Jurado-Oller et al. 2015