Open Access

Isolation of a genetically accessible thermophilic xylan degrading bacterium from compost

  • Martinus J. A. Daas1,
  • Antonius H. P. van de Weijer1,
  • Willem M. de Vos1,
  • John van der Oost1 and
  • Richard van Kranenburg1, 2Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels20169:210

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0618-7

Received: 9 May 2016

Accepted: 20 September 2016

Published: 6 October 2016

Abstract

Background

Due to the finite nature of global oil resources we are now faced with the challenge of finding renewable resources to produce fuels and chemicals in the future. Lactic acid has great potential as a precursor for the production of bioplastics alternatives to conventional plastics. Efficient lactic acid fermentation from non-food lignocellulosic substrates requires pretreatment and saccharification to generate fermentable sugars. A fermentation process that requires little to no enzyme additions, i.e. consolidated bioprocessing would be preferred and requires lactic acid-producing organisms that have cellulolytic and/or hemicellulolytic activity.

Results

To obtain candidate production strains we have enriched and isolated facultative anaerobic (hemi) cellulolytic bacterial strains from compost samples. By selecting for growth on both cellulose and xylan, 94 Geobacillus strains were isolated. Subsequent screening for lactic acid production was carried out from C6 and C5 sugar fermentations and a selection of the best lactic acid producers was made. The denitrifying Geobacillus thermodenitrificans T12 was selected for further research and was rendered genetically accessible. In fermentations on a mixture of glucose and xylose, a total of 20.3 g of lactic acid was produced with a yield of 0.94 g product/g sugar consumed. In addition, strain T12 is capable of direct conversion of beech wood xylan to mainly lactic acid in minimal media.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that G. thermodenitrificans T12 is genetically accessible and produces lactic acid as its main fermentation product on glucose, xylose and a mixture thereof. Strain T12 was additionally used for the direct conversion of xylan to lactic acid. The genetic accessibility of the T12 strain provides a solid basis for the development of this strain into a host for consolidated bioprocessing of biomass to lactic acid.

Keywords

Geobacillus Thermophile Compost Xylan CMC Lactic acid Electroporation Fermentation

Background

The increasing consciousness regarding the sustainability of our current life standards has led to the accelerating development of alternative production strategies for fuels, energy and chemicals [1]. Lactic acid is an organic acid that can be used as building block for poly lactic acid (PLA) [2]. Petrochemically produced lactic acid always yields a racemic mixture of both d- and l-lactic acid which results in a lower thermostability of the PLA polymer in comparison to its optically pure counterpart derived from microbial production. Microbial production of lactic acid currently dominates the chemical synthesis alternative; however, the efficiency largely depends on the substrate, microbe and mode of production. In recent years the use of lignocellulosic or non-edible biomass as a resource has gained much interest as it does not compete with the food and feed industry. However, use of this type of substrate requires costly saccharolytic enzymes for successful conversion to fermentable sugars [3]. Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) is a method designed to exclude such enzymes and thus optimise lignocellulosic conversion in the most economically feasible way. It is believed that this mode of integration can result in a process four times more cost-efficient even when compared to simultaneous saccharification and fermentation [4].

In the last decades substantial efforts have been made to isolate and engineer organisms for the conversion of lignocellulosic substrates. The search for suitable saccharolytic organisms even from the most extreme and remote spots on earth has led to the discovery of many novel isolates [5, 6]. Among these are isolates from the genus Geobacillus, a versatile group of thermophilic facultative anaerobic bacteria [7]. Geobacillus are Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacteria with the ability to sporulate. In recent years, this genus has gained much interest not only because of their thermostable enzymes, but also because of their ability to ferment C6 and C5 sugars simultaneously. Furthermore, several Geobacillus strains are capable of degrading xylan or cellulose [8, 9]. Xylanolytic activity is common in this genus and the responsible hemicellulose utilisation (HUS) locus, containing the majority of genes involved in the hemicellulose metabolism, has been described in detail elsewhere [10]. Cellulolytic activity has been demonstrated only in a few studies [1113]. In addition, Geobacillus strains have been proven to be useful for heterologous expression of a variety of proteins [14, 15]. Nevertheless, only limited information on this genus is available, with only 18 complete genome sequences in the NCBI database and only a few strains that have been proven to be readily transformable [1618]. Moreover, genetic accessibility of (geo) bacilli seems to be strain-specific [16, 17]. Because the lack of knowledge of the Geobacillus species is considered to be one of the main drawbacks to fully exploit members of this genus as platform organisms, more genome sequences, physiological data and improved genetic tools are required.

In this paper, we describe the isolation of novel Geobacillus strains of various species with the ability to degrade cellulose and/or xylan. The optimisation of transformation and the heterologous expression of a reporter gene are shown for one selected strain. In addition, the production of lactic acid by this strain was demonstrated on glucose, xylose and on beech wood xylan.

Methods

Media and cultivation methods

Cellulolytic thermophile vitamin medium (CTVM; based on [14, 17, 19, 20]) contained per L: 8.37 g MOPS and salts mix consisting of 1 g NH4Cl; 3 g NaCl; 1.50 g Na2SO4; 0.08 g NaHCO3; 1 g KCl; 1.8 g MgCl2 × 6H2O; 0.30 g CaCl2 × 2H2O. pH was set to 6.6 at room temperature and the medium was autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C, after which 1 mL of K2HPO4 (250 g/L; pH 6.6), 10 mL of filter sterile 100× metal mix and 1 mL of filter sterile 1000× vitamin solution were added. 100× metal mix contained per liter: 1.60 g MnCl2 × 6H2O; 0.1 g ZnSO4; 0.2 g H3BO3; 0.01 g CuSO4 × 5H2O; 0.01 g Na2MoO4 × 2H2O; 0.1 g CoCl2 × 6H2O; 0.7 g FeSO4 × 7H2O; 5 g CaCl2 × 2H2O; 20 g MgCl2 × 6H2O. 1000× vitamin mix contained per L: 0.1 g thiamine; 0.1 g riboflavin; 0.5 g nicotinic acid; 0.1 g panthothenic acid; 0.5 g pyridoxamine, HCl; 0.5 g pyridoxal, HCl; 0.1 g d-biotin; 0.1 g folic acid; 0.1 g p-aminobenzoic acid; 0.1 g cobalamin.

LB2 contains per liter: 10 g tryptone (Oxoid), 5 g yeast extract (Roth), 10 g sodium chloride and salts mix consisting of 1 g NH4Cl; 3 g NaCl; 1.50 g Na2SO4; 0.08 g NaHCO3; 1 g KCl; 1.8 g MgCl2 × 6H2O; 0.30 g CaCl2 × 2H2O. pH was set to 6.6 at room temperature and the medium was autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C, after which 10 mL of K2HPO4 (250 g/L) was added.

Minimal Media (MM) contained per liter: 0.52 g K2HPO4; 0.23 g KH2PO4; 0.5 g NH4NO3 (MMy) or 0.3 g NH4Cl (MMy+). After autoclaving, 1 mL of the following 1000× concentrated sterile stocks were added: Nitrilotriacetic acid (200 g/L); MgSO4 × 7H2O (145.44 g/L); CaCl2 × 2H2O (133.78 g/L); FeSO4 × 7H2O (11.12 g/L).

For CTVMy/MMy medium, 0.5 g/L yeast extract (Roth) was added to the medium and CTVMy+/MMy+ contains 5 g/L yeast extract (Roth).

Glycerol stocks of cultures were made by adding 500 µL of sterilised 60 % glycerol to 1.5 mL culture, in a 2 mL cryogenic vial (Corning). Stocks were stored at −80 °C.

In all plate and tube cultures, carbon substrates were used in a concentration of 10 g/L unless stated otherwise. Carbon sources were autoclaved separately with xylose being filter sterilised.

For plate cultures, 5 g/L gelrite (Roth) was added. Anaerobic cultivation of plates was done in an anaerobic jar (HP0011, Oxoid) containing an AnaeroGen sachet (AN0035, Oxoid).

All wild-type strains were isolated and cultured at 65 °C. Strains harbouring the pNW33n plasmid are always cultured at 55 °C to maintain the plasmids replication. Cultures in liquid media are shaken at 150 RPM unless stated otherwise.

Sampling

Samples were collected from both a mature and an active compost heap at ReCom Ede (NL). The temperature of the mature compost was around 35 °C at the sampling site on top of the compost heap and around 65 °C for the active compost heap which was sampled at a depth of 30 cm. Both heaps were semi-anaerobic due to mixing once every week. The sampling site of the 1st isolation was aerobic since the sampling was done on top of the compost. Samples were taken by scraping compost into a plastic jar and were used to inoculate immediately after transport to the lab at room temperature. The sample of the 2nd isolation was kept under anaerobic conditions during transport using an Oxoid AnaeroGen sachet in a sealed anaerobic box.

Isolation procedure

For the first isolation, 25 g mature compost was added to 250 mL of CTVM-CMC in a 500 mL flask and shaken for 3 h at 150 rpm at 65 °C. After 3 h, compost was sieved with a 3 mm pore size filter and dilution series were plated on CTVMy-CMC and CTVM-CMC and grown aerobically for 72 h. Subsequently, single colonies were picked and transferred to fresh plates containing either CTVMy-CMC or CTVM-CMC (according to their isolation plate). Identical plates lacking CMC were used as negative control. Grown isolates were transferred twice to assay consistent growth and eliminate false-positives. These false-positives present colonies that possibly grow on the degradation products produced by surrounding colonies. By transferring colonies to fresh plates we were able to eliminate those from the selection. Remaining isolates were then grown anaerobically for 96 h to assay their potential of anaerobic growth. The remaining isolates were used to obtain pure cultures and afterwards stored in 15 % glycerol at −80 °C.

In the second isolation, 10 g active compost was inoculated into 100 mL of CTVM in a 500 mL beaker and stirred for 5 min at room temperature. Due to the active state of the compost, oxygen levels are believed to be limited at the sampling site. Therefore, the isolation of microorganisms from this sample was initiated under anaerobic conditions to mimic the site of sampling. Dilution series were plated on CTVMy-CMC and CTVM-CMC and grown anaerobically for 72 h. Subsequently, single colonies were picked and each colony was streaked to plates containing CTVMy or CTVM (according to their isolation plate) with or without CMC and grown anaerobically at 65 °C for 168 h (7 days). Isolates lacking growth on the negative controls were transferred twice more to CTVM(y)-CMC plates to assay consistent growth and eliminate false-positives. Pure cultures were obtained on CTVMy-glc plates and subsequently stored in 15 % glycerol stocks at −80 °C.

16S rRNA-encoding gene identification and phylogenetic analysis

Single colonies were picked from plates and inoculated to pre-warmed CTVMy medium with 1 % w/v glucose. When cultures reached the exponential phase (OD600 between 0.5 and 1) 2 µL was transferred to a PCR tube. PCR mix was added containing 1.25 units of DreamTaq DNA polymerase (Fermentas), 10× DreamTaq buffer (Fermentas), 100 µM of dNTPs (Fermentas), 0.2 µM of both primers GM3 (AGAGTTTGATCATGGC) and GM4 (TACCTTGTTACGACTT) and milliQ water in a total volume of 50 µL [21]. PCR products were checked on 1 % agarose gels and products were purified using a GeneJet PCR purification kit (Fermentas). CloneManager software was used to assemble and manually curate the GM3 and GM4 sequences into one contig after which BLASTn was used for identification against the non-redundant nucleotide collection of the NCBI database. Contigs were aligned using Mega6 [22] software and MUSCLE v3.8.31 [23] with 5 iterations and, subsequently, were trimmed to equal length using Jalview version 2.0 [24]. The 94 sequences have been submitted to NCBI under GenBank accession numbers KX113522–KX113615. A phylogenetic tree was created using the neighbor-joining method [25] and a bootstrap analysis [26] was done using 1000 replicates. Type strains used in the phylogenetic tree were derived from the following GenBank accession numbers: NR_043021.1 (G. thermodenitrificans DSM 465), NR_043022.1 (G. thermoglucosidasius DSM 2542), NR_028708.1 (G. caldoxylosilyticus DSM 12041), NR_115285.1 (G. kaustophilus DSM 7263), FN428684.1 (G. thermoleovorans DSM 5366), NZ_CP010052.1 (B. subtilis DSM 402).

Selection

All pure strains were inoculated from glycerol stocks to plates containing CTVMy-CMC and CTVMy-xylan and subsequently incubated anaerobically for 48 h. Plates were then washed using milliQ water to remove all cells and subsequently stained for 5 min using a 0.1 % (w/w) Congo red dye. After staining, plates were de-stained for 15 min using 1 M NaCl under constant swirling. Clearing zones were identified visually and graded using a 4 step scale ranging from 0 to 4 with zero being no visible clearing zone and four representing the biggest clearing zone.

Screening on fermentation products was carried out in duplicate in 15 mL Greiner tubes with a total volume of 10 mL containing CTVMy medium at an initial pH of 6.5 with cellobiose or xylose as carbon substrate. Tubes were inoculated from plate colonies and incubated at 65 °C for 48 h with agitation at 50 rpm. After 48 h samples were taken for HPLC analysis on fermentation product profiles and quantities. Strains were then ranked based on highest total amount of products and highest total lactic acid formed. The average score of both cellobiose and xylose duplicates were combined and best scoring strains were then compared to the selected isolates from the Congo red plate assay (data not shown). Isolates with high enzymatic activity for either CMC and/or xylan combined with an above average ranking in the fermentation assay were selected to examine their genetic accessibility.

Genetic accessibility and heterologous expression of the pheB reporter gene

Three isolates closely related to G. thermodenitrificans (99 %), G. caldoxylosilyticus (100 %) and G. thermoleovorans (99 %) were selected to evaluate genetic accessibility by electroporation. Strains were subjected to transformation in triplicate according to the protocols for Geobacillus described previously [14, 27] using the pNW33n plasmid isolated from E. coli dH5α. After 2 h recovery at 60 °C, electroporated cells were spread on LB2 plates containing 7 µg/mL of chloramphenicol and incubated for 24 h at 60 °C. Colonies that appeared within 48 h were subjected to PCR as described above to verify the presence of plasmid pNW33n inside the cells.

Optimisation of the transformation protocol was performed on strain T12. Three concentrations (0, 0.25 and 2.5 g/L) of K2HPO4 in the growth medium were used and washing of the cells was done 2 times with 50 mL of milliQ water followed by 2 washing steps, of 25 and 10 mL, respectively, using 10 % (v/v) glycerol [28].

As a demonstration of genetic accessibility, we cloned the reporter gene pheB, derived from G. stearothermophilus DSM 6285 (GenBank accession no. DQ146476.2) into strain T12. The pheB gene was synthesised by GeneArt (Thermo Scientific) as an expression construct using the constitutive promoter PuppT12. Promoter PuppT12 is derived from the upstream region (100nt) of the uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene from T12 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The promoter together with the pheB reporter gene were cloned to pNW33n between the Acc65I and PstI restriction sites. Activity of the reporter gene was tested by spraying colonies with 100 mM catechol followed by incubation at 55 °C for 5 min.

Fermentations

Fermentations were performed in an Eppendorf DASGIP parallel bioreactor system or an Applikon fermentor system. In the Eppendorf DASGIP parallel bioreactor system glass reactors of 1.4 L and a working volume of 0.5 L was used with Dasgip control 4.0 to control the process. Glass reactors of 2 L and a working volume of 1 L were used in the Applikon fermentor system with BioXpert V2 for control. The conditions were as follows: Temperature was controlled at 65 °C, pH at 7.0 by addition of 3 M KOH and the stirring speed was 150 rpm. Antifoam 204 (Sigma-Aldrich) was added as required.

Pre-cultures were grown overnight from glycerol stock in 10 mL medium in a 50 mL tube at 65 °C and 150 rpm. The next morning 3 mL was transferred to 50 mL of medium in a 250 mL baffled Erlenmeyer and grown for 2 h before 2 % (v/v) was inoculated to the reactor. Samples of 2 mL were taken for off-line OD-measurements by determining the turbidity at 600 nm. Concentrations of sugar and fermentation products were determined by HPLC.

HPLC

Sugars and fermentation products were measured using an ICS5000 HPLC system from Thermo Scientific equipped with a Dionex DP pump, Dionex AS-AP autosampler, Dionex VWD UV detector operated at 210 nm and Shodex RI detector at 35 °C. An Aminex HPX-87H cation-exchange column was used with a mobile phase of 8 mM H2SO4 and was operated at 0.8 mL/min and 60 °C. All samples were diluted with 10 mM dimethyl sulfoxide in 4 mM H2SO4 in a ratio of 5:1 sample/internal standard.

Results

To isolate facultative anaerobic thermophiles capable of degrading cellulose and/or xylan, mature and active compost of plant materials were sampled with temperatures of 35 and 65 °C, respectively, at time of isolation.

Isolation

The mature compost was suspended in CTVM medium at 65 °C and dilution series were plated on CTVM-CMC with or without 0.5 g/L yeast extract at 65 °C to select for thermophiles. Addition of yeast extract resulted in approximately 1.5 times more colonies. From both media, 130 isolates were picked and grown aerobically for almost 4 days. Clear differences in growth speed/lag time and recovery rate were observed in favour of plates containing yeast extract (Additional file 2: Table S1). The control plates without carbon source (CTVM and CTVMy) showed no or very little growth of the isolates, indicating that CMC was required to obtain the growth monitored. Growth of some isolates became visible later than that of others, which may indicate either slower growth rates or an elongated lag phase, due to growth on degradation products of other isolates. When isolates were streaked again to fresh medium, lag time was shortened and the amount of recovered isolates decreased, possibly due to the elimination of false-positives (Additional file 2: Table S1).

The active compost sample used in the second isolation was resuspended in CTVM medium, plated on CTVMy-CMC medium and incubated anaerobically at 65 °C for 72 h. After incubation, 130 colonies from the CTVMy-CMC plates and 130 colonies from CTVM-CMC plates were isolated and subsequently transferred to fresh plates. None of the isolates from the CTVM-CMC plates were recovered and only 17 could be recovered from the CTVMy-CMC plates. Further transfers demonstrated that maintaining the isolates on CMC medium was often unsuccessful and revival from glycerol stocks was even more challenging (Table 1).
Table 1

Isolate numbers recovered after multiple transfers on both CTVM-CMC and CTVMy-CMC media

Isolation round

Media

Isolates

Recovery 1st transfer

Recovery 2nd transfer

Recovery 3th transfer

Recovery −80 stock

1st (aerobic)

CTVM-CMC

130

63

31

31

9

CTVMy-CMC

130

99

79

79

79

2nd (anaerobic)

CTVM-CMC

130

0

0

0

0

CTVMy-CMC

130

17

16

13

6

Total

 

520

179

126

123

94

From the initial 520 isolates 94 have been recovered

Selection

Pure cultures obtained from both isolation rounds were subjected to 16S rRNA-encoding gene sequencing for identification. All 94 isolates belonged to the Geobacillus genus (Fig. 1). The majority, 73 of 94 isolates, were G. thermodenitrificans. The remainder was classified as G. thermoglucosidans (11), G. caldoxylosilyticus (8) and G. kaustophilus (2).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences of Geobacillus isolates and their type strains (underlined). Phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Neighbor-joining method and tested with the bootstrap method using 1000 replicates. Selected isolate G. thermodenitrificans T12 is indicated by a black box

Further selection was based on fermentation product profiles. Isolates were pre-grown on CTVMy-glc and subsequently transferred to fresh CTVMy media containing either glucose or xylose as the carbon source. After 48 h fermentation products were measured by HPLC (Additional files 3, 4: Tables S2, S3). All strains produced lactic acid as their main fermentation product. Besides lactic acid, acetic acid was present in all cultures. In some cases, independent of the amount of lactic acid, ethanol and formate were also produced. Succinate production was seen in some cultures, with G. thermodenitrificans T78 showing the highest average concentration of 4.3 mM succinic acid accounting for 19.3 % (mol/mol) of the total products (data not shown). All strains belonging to G. thermoglucosidans showed similar production profiles implying low variability within this genus in comparison to for instance G. caldoxylosilyticus. G. thermoglucosidans is highly represented in the 25 strains with the highest organic acid production titers. This is demonstrated by the presence of 10 out of 11 strains in the cellobiose fermentations ranking and 8 of 11 strains in the xylose fermentations ranking (Additional files 3, 4; Tables S2, S3). Contrary to this observation, G. thermoglucosidans is underrepresented in the ranking of the 25 best lactic acid producers with only 3 (C6) and 4 (C5) strains listed. Under such conditions G. thermodenitrificans has a more homolactic phenotype while G. thermoglucosidans has a more mixed acid fermentation phenotype (data not shown). The mixed acid fermentation profiles of G. thermoglucosidans are in line with a previous study that demonstrated a mixed acid fermentation profile under micro-aerobic conditions [29].

The list of strains producing the highest amounts of lactic acid from cellobiose fermentation was overlaid with the list of isolates producing most lactic acid on xylose. No isolates belonging to G. caldoxylosilyticus or G. kaustophilus appeared in both lists. In addition to the fermentation assays described above, all 94 isolates were subjected to Congo red stain after growth on CMC and beech wood xylan. About 24 strains degraded CMC, as indicated by halo formation after staining with the Congo red dye. However, after repeated assays using Congo red it became evident that the formation of halos was highly irreproducible, although growth was similar in most cases. When grown on xylan, halos were more pronounced and a clear degradation was observed for about half of the isolates. Strain T12 showed strong and reproducible breakdown of xylan. Based on the concentrations of the products in the cellobiose and xylose fermentations, and the reproducibility of the plate assays, strains T12, T62, and T85 (all originating from the 1st isolation round) were considered the best isolates for further study.

Electroporation and optimisation of transformation

The genetic accessibility of these three selected isolates were then evaluated by electroporation performed based on protocols described previously [14, 30], with some modifications. Cells were transformed by electroporation using the E. coliBacillus shuttle vector pNW33n, a vector that has been widely used in thermophilic bacilli [17, 31, 32]. Colonies found to be chloramphenicol-resistant were streaked to fresh LB2 plates supplemented with chloramphenicol to eliminate false-positives and successful transformation was confirmed by colony PCR. Following this, plasmids were isolated from the positive clones and subjected to restriction analysis to confirm integrity, before transfer back to E. coli. While T62 and T85 did not yield any colonies, transformation of strain T12 reproducibly did. In all cases the colonies obtained for T12 were positive for plasmid uptake. Although the efficiency was low, the high reproducibility provided the opportunity for optimisation. Different culture media and wash protocols were evaluated (Table 2), and a combination of reduced concentrations of K2HPO4 with a wash protocol derived from [28], proved to be the best protocol with an optimum CFU/µg DNA of 1.7 × 104. The LB2 medium initially used resulted in a short pulse time constant of 3.7 ms. However, changing this growth medium to a variant with a lower salt concentration resulted in an increased pulse time constant and a CFU/µg DNA of 1240, which was in line with the results seen in previous research [17]. Consequently, decreasing the salt concentrations in the growth medium LB2 resulted in the cell pellets becoming less dense, leading to loss of many cells during washing. To prevent the loss of cells, 0.25 g/L K2HPO4 was added and wash buffers were changed to milliQ water and 10 % glycerol, to increase the osmotic shock that results in weakening of the bacterial cell wall. Several variables need to be balanced to obtain a successful electroporation protocol. For example with a more severe wash protocol, the cells will be weaker during electroporation, which will probably require a lower voltage to reduce further damage to the cells. Although no statistical underpinning was performed, our protocol is demonstrated to be reproducible.
Table 2

Overview of transformation optimisations for G. thermodenitrificans T12

Parameter changed

Medium

Growtha (h)

Final ODb

Voltage

Ω

µF

Cuvette width (mm)

Ptdc (ms)

DNAd (µg)

CFU/

µg DNA

N.A.

LB2

(2.50 g/L K2HPO4)

2

1.01

2000

200

25

2

3.7

3.031

4

Medium

LB2

(0.25 g/L K2HPO4)

1.67

0.96

2000

200

25

2

5.1

1.613

1240

Medium

LB2

(0.00 g/L K2HPO4)

1.66

0.96

2000

200

25

2

5

1.613

22

Wash buffere

LB2

(2.50 g/L K2HPO4)

1.67

0.96

2000

200

25

2

5.2

1.613

19

Medium/wash buffere

LB2

(0.00 g/L K2HPO4)

1.66

0.96

2000

200

25

2

5.4

1.613

2988

Medium/wash buffere

LB2

(0.25 g/L K2HPO4)

1.83

0.96

2000

200

25

2

5.5

1.564

17,071

a Time of growth after dilution of the overnight pre-culture

b Final OD600 of the culture after growth prior to the washing step

c Pulse time duration in milliseconds

d Amount of plasmid (pNW33n) DNA added for transformation

e Wash protocol was changed to 2 times washing with milliQ water (50 mL) followed by washing with 25 and 10 mL milliQ water +10 % glycerol

To verify the potential of the T12 genetic accessibility, we introduced pheB as a reporter gene. The reporter gene pheB, derived from G. stearothermophilus DSM 6285 (GenBank accession no. DQ146476.2), encodes a heterologous catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (C23O). The pheB gene is demonstrated to function as a reporter gene in G. thermoglucosidans, where it has been used for the quantification of promoter strength [33]. The protein C23O oxidises catechol to form 2-hydroxymuconic semialdehyde (2-HMSA) which has a bright yellow colour. Colonies harbouring the pheB expression construct can, therefore, be visualised by spraying them with 100 mM catechol and incubating them for 5 min at 55 °C. A bright yellow colour was observed on all colonies harbouring the pheB expression construct, while no colour change was observed in colonies harbouring empty pNW33n plasmids (Additional file 5: Figure S2).

Growth and fermentation of T12

Fermentation characteristics of G. thermodenitrificans T12 were evaluated under micro-aerobic conditions. To determine an optimal pH, multiple pH-controlled fermentations were carried out in MMy media containing 30 g/L glucose, with a pH range of 5.5–8.5. Both growth and product formation were monitored during the fermentation (data not shown) to determine the optimal conditions. Growth was observed between pH 5.5 and 7.5, with an optimum between pH 6.5 and 7.5. This optimal growth pH of 7.5 coincided with the highest amount of lactic acid production followed closely by the culture at pH 6.5.

To assay the potential of strain T12 in converting biomass derived sugars, its fermentation products and productivity thereof, were quantified in fermentations with glucose, xylose and mixtures of these sugars as carbon source. For all carbon substrates, both MMy media (containing 0.5 g/L yeast extract and NH4NO3) as well as MMy+ media (containing 5 g/L yeast extract and NH4Cl) were evaluated (Fig. 2; Table 3). Ammonium nitrate was added to MMy medium to stimulate biomass formation [34].
Fig. 2

Fermentations of G. thermodenitrificans T12 on a 2:1 glucose/xylose mixture. Fermentations were carried out at pH 7.0 at 150 rpm. Fermentations started with a 0.5 L air headspace without additional sparging and media consisted of 500 mL MMy (a) or MMy+ (b). glucose; xylose; lactic acid; × OD600

Table 3

Overview of fermentations of G. thermodenitrificans T12 on glucose, xylose and glucose/xylose mixtures

Media

Substrate

Time (h)

Cons. (g)

Cons. rate (g/L/h)

Lactic acid production (g)

Lactic acid productivity

Lactic acid yield

Lactic acid yield

(g/L/h)

(g product/g substrate consumed)

(% of theoretical yield)

MMy

30 g/L glucose

25.2

9.43

0.37

3.10

0.12

0.33

10.3

MMy

30 g/L xylose

25

6.93

0.28

3.83

0.15

0.55

12.8

MMy

20 g/L glucose + 10 g/L xylose

54.95

19.87 glucose 6.55 xylose

0.33 glucose 0.11 xylose

17.93

0.30

0.69

59.8

MMy+

30 g/L glucose

27

11.35

0.41

8.48

0.30

0.74

28.3

MMy+

30 g/L xylose

27

15.23

0.54

8.73

0.31

0.57

29.1

MMy+

20 g/L glucose + 10 g/L xylose

25

14.51 glucose 7.05 xylose

0.50 glucose 0.24 xylose

20.27

0.71

0.94

67.6

Fermentations were carried out at pH 7.0 at 150 rpm. Fermentations started with a 0.5 L air headspace without additional sparging. MMy media contained 0.5 g/L of yeast extract, whereas MMy+ media contained 5 g/L of yeast extract

The average lactic acid productivity on 30 g/L glucose or 30 g/L xylose, either on minimal or rich medium, did not differ significantly. However, productivities differ when comparing a single carbon source on minimal and rich medium (Table 3). Co-fermentation of both glucose and xylose was performed in both media (Fig. 2; Table 3). When MMy medium with a 2:1 ratio of glucose:xylose was used, a total of 17.9 g lactic acid was produced in 55 h with an overall yield of 0.7 g lactic acid/ g sugar consumed. From the start of the fermentation, both glucose and xylose were consumed simultaneously though the consumption rates for xylose were lower in comparison to glucose (Table 3). Fermentations in MMy+ medium showed improved consumption rates, productivity and yield of lactic acid produced per amount of consumed substrate.

In all mixed sugar fermentations the xylose consumption rate was 2–3 times slower when compared to the consumption rate of glucose. To exclude the possibility that the sugar concentration is instrumental in this observation, a glucose/xylose co-fermentation was completed with equal concentrations of the two sugars (10 g/L) in MMy medium. Observed consumption rates of 0.2 g/L/h for glucose and 0.1 g/L/h for xylose confirm that glucose is in fact favoured over xylose in co-fermentation.

The Congo Red assay showed that strain T12 was capable of degrading beech wood xylan on solid medium. To quantify its fermentation products liquid cultures with 10 g/L beech wood xylan as carbon source were used. Fermentations were carried out in 50 mL Greiner tubes with different volumes of head space and 250 mL shake flasks to demonstrate the impact of oxygen (Fig. 3). Under micro-aerobic conditions in low nutrient (MMy) medium (Fig. 3a, b), lactic acid (11 mM) was the main fermentation product followed by acetic acid. In 250 mL baffled Erlenmeyer shake flasks using 50 mL culture (1:5 with more aeration), lactic acid concentration was reduced to 0.55 (±0.04) mM and acetic acid increased to 19 (±0.04) mM (data not shown). Use of the rich (MMy+) medium under any condition resulted in minimal amounts of lactic acid production (Fig. 3c) and increased acetate production, due to the conversion of the yeast extract (Fig. 3d). In addition to the increased lactic acid production we noticed an increase in cell densities in minimal media with xylan in comparison to cultures on minimal media without xylan (Fig. 3a). In rich media no significant difference in cell densities were observed between cultures with and without xylan, likely due to high growth rates on yeast extract (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3

Xylan fermentations by G. thermodenitrificans T12. Lactic acid production (a, c) and acetic acid production (b, d) of strain T12 on MMy (a, b) and MMy+ (c, d) media with xylan (light-grey bars) and without xylan (dark-grey bars). The cultures were grown in 50 mL Greiner tubes at pH 6.5 and 150 rpm. Ratios on the X-axis represent the ratio of medium and headspace during fermentation. Growth () is expressed as increase of cells on xylan compared to cultures without xylan

Discussion

This study was aimed at the discovery of novel industrially relevant strains that harbour saccharolytic enzymes to degrade cellulose and xylan have lactic acid as their main fermentation product and are genetically accessible. We describe the isolation of 94 facultative anaerobic Geobacillus strains that were capable of fermentation of both C6 and C5 sugars under micro-aerobic and anaerobic conditions. For isolate G. thermodenitrificans T12 direct conversion of beech wood xylan to lactic acid was demonstrated. The selection methods yielded several isolates that were capable of degrading xylan and cellulose. All strains described in this study were isolated from compost at both moderate and high temperature by repetitive growth on both CMC and xylan. It has been previously shown that Geobacillus was the dominant genus in “mature” compost [3537]. However, it cannot be concluded if the ratio of Geobacillus species found in this study represents the composition of the Geobacillus community in the compost heap sampled, or results from selection by the sampling and isolation methods. In prior studies [17], compost heaps on the same site were sampled and screened for thermophilic organisms. The TMM media used in the study of Bosma et al. [17] contained 0.9 g NaNO3 which led, at 65 °C, to the isolation of mainly G. thermodenitrificans strains. When both vitamins and metals were added, a larger diversity in Geobacillus species was found. In isolations done at 60 °C without nitrate in the medium approximately half the isolates belonged to Geobacillus but no G. thermodenitrificans isolates were found (E F Bosma, unpublished data). With the selection criteria used in this study, it was anticipated that geobacilli would be isolated. The overrepresentation of G. thermodenitrificans (79 % of isolates) in this isolation procedure, however, was surprising since nitrate was excluded from the isolation media to prevent this species benefiting over other species.

All strains were isolated after repeated growth on CMC and beech wood xylan. Degradation of xylan was always detectable and most strains showed clearing zones when assayed on Congo red plates. In contrast, the results on CMC in Congo red assays appeared difficult to reproduce. Although never described for Geobacillus or closely related species, the irreproducibility is most likely caused by regulation of the expression of saccharolytic enzymes, as has been described for xylanolytic enzymes [38]. The latter study describes that the hemicellulose utilisation (HUS) locus is most likely induced by small amounts of free xylose. It is known that the coverage of the HUS locus varies substantially among Geobacillus species and even differs per strain [10]. From our study it has become clear that within geobacilli there is major variation in the regulation of the xylanolytic cassette. In apparently identical situations, the breakdown of xylan differs greatly between Geobacillus species and even between strains of the same species. Regulation of cellulase gene expression has not yet been described for Geobacilli and details of its control remain elusive. Growth is no direct evidence for the presence of extracellular cellulases although free glucose is limited in this substrate which implies at least some cellulolytic activity to be present.

When grown under micro-aerobic conditions, all isolates generated lactic acid as their main fermentation product from glucose and xylose. Acetate and succinate were always present as minor by-products, and occasionally, formate and ethanol were produced. Isolates belonging to the G. thermoglucosidans clade showed low differentiation in terms of fermentation products and amounts, whereas G. caldoxylosilyticus and G. thermodenitrificans produce quite a diverse spectrum.

Genetic accessibility was tested for three selected isolates. Strain T12 was found to be reproducibly transformable, albeit with low efficiencies of 3–5 transformants per µg of plasmid DNA. In previous research [17], only 2 of 25 strains of G. thermodenitrificans could be transformed. The transformation efficiencies of G. thermodenitrificans isolates in the latter study are in line with the efficiency of transformation described here. Efficient transformation of a G. thermodenitrificans strain by electroporation has been described before [16] yielding approximately 2.8 × 106 colonies/µg DNA. However, this protocol resulted in only 3–5 T12 transformants/µg of plasmid DNA. The efficiency reported by Kananavičiute and Čitavičius [16] was obtained using plasmid DNA isolated from the same strain, circumventing possible degradation by a native restriction modification system. Conversely, there is no literature available describing a systematic approach in optimising electroporation protocols for Geobacillus species. We have optimised the transformation for G. thermodenitrificans T12 by adjusting the concentration of K2HPO4 in its growth media used in preparation of making the cells competent. The change of wash buffers further increased the transformation efficiency to CFU/µg DNA of 1.7 × 104. With this transformation efficiency we were able to introduce the heterologous reporter gene pheB to T12. The expression of the pheB gene, controlled by a constitutive promoter (PuppT12), shows the potential of strain T12 for further genetic engineering. Strain T12 was selected based on its ability to grow on CMC plates, its reproducible xylan degradation, an above average product titre on C6 and C5 fermentations, and its genetic accessibility, which provides opportunities to develop this strain into a host for CBP processes. To reach this potential, the organism should be engineered to produce cellulolytic enzymes.

Strain T12 was found to have an optimum pH between 6.5 and 7.5, and temperature of 65 °C, identical to that of isolation. When T12 is grown on pure glucose or xylose the sugar consumption rate was almost equal, whereas during co-fermentation the glucose consumption rate was approximately two to three times as high compared to the xylose consumption rate. This indicates that the presence of glucose partially inhibits xylose uptake and/or metabolism. Reduced xylose consumption by Geobacillus in a glucose/xylose mixture has been reported before [29]. On average, hemicellulose makes up 25–35 % of lignocellulosic biomass, which makes simultaneous sugar uptake advantageous for the CBP economy [39]. There are many microbes capable of xylose consumption, however, most of these organisms suppress the uptake of xylose when glucose is present. This negative feedback results in sequential consumption of available sugars, leading to elongated fermentation times or accumulation of xylose in the reactor during fed-batch.

We have demonstrated the direct conversion of beech wood xylan into lactic acid by G. thermodenitrificans T12. The ratio of medium to headspace was important for this process, where increased oxygen transfer seems to positively affect xylan degradation, but negatively influences the ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid produced. Higher acetic acid production was seen with higher oxygen concentrations, while lactic acid was mostly produced in micro-aerobic conditions. The reduced degradation of xylan under high nutrient conditions (MMy+) was most likely caused by the repression of xynA by the global regulator CodY. It is known from B. subtilis that the CodY regulator is responsive to branched-chain amino acids (nutrient-rich conditions) [40]. A CodY orthologue has been found in the genome sequence of G. thermodenitrificans T12 (to be published), and two potential binding regions for CodY, based on the binding region consensus sequences from [38, 40], were identified in the promoter region of the T12 xynA gene (Fig. 4). For G. stearothermophilus T6, which has a xylanolytic operon similar to that of T12, CodY binding to the xynA promoter was demonstrated and its function as repressor of xynA expression was postulated [38]. Our results are in line with this hypothesis (Fig. 4c, d).
Fig. 4

Intergenic region of the divergently oriented xynX and xynA genes. The predicted start codons of xynA and xynX genes are shown boldface and underlined. Predicted CodY-binding regions and predicted xylose regulator XylR-binding sites are shaded grey. Nucleotides matching the B. subtilis consensus sequences have been underlined. The CcpA-binding sites reported for G. stearothermophilus T6 [38] were not found

Conclusions

In conclusion, a collection of 94 Geobacillus isolates were obtained from an initial selection of 520 thermophilic organisms, by screening for lactic acid production on both C6 and C5 sugars, together with the ability to degrade xylan and/or cellulose. Genetic accesibility was confirmed and optimised for one isolate, which was designated G. thermodenitrificans T12. This strain is able to grow on CMC plates, although Congo red assays are inconsistent. Strain T12 is capable of fermenting both xylose and glucose simultaneously with lactic acid as its main fermentation product. In addition, beechwood xylan was directly converted to lactic acid. The capacity of strain T12 to ferment xylan together with its genetic accessibility makes G. thermodenitrificans T12 a potential candidate for consolidated bioprocessing.

Abbreviations

PLA: 

poly lactic acid

CBP: 

consolidated bioprocessing

HUS locus: 

hemicellulose utilisation locus

NCBI: 

National Centre For Biotechnology Information

CTVM: 

cellulolytic thermophile vitamin medium

MM: 

minimal medium

LB: 

luria bertani

CMC: 

carboxymethyl cellulose

Glc: 

glucose

OD: 

optical density

HPLC: 

high pressure liquid chromatography

O/N: 

overnight

RI: 

refractive index

CFU/µg DNA: 

colony forming units per microgram of plasmid DNA

Ptd: 

pulse time duration

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MD designed and performed the study, analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. AW performed fermentations, prepared corresponding data and assisted in drafting the manuscript. WV and JO assisted in the interpretation of data, coordinated the study and revised the manuscript. RvK assisted in the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, coordinated the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved on the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Willem van Harten from Recom Ede for allowing us to sample their compost and Sofia Thomaidou and Ioanna Papakosta for their excellent technical assistance.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. RvK is employed by Corbion (Gorinchem, The Netherlands).

Funding

This work was financially supported by BE-Basic (www.be-basic.org) and Corbion.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University
(2)
Corbion

References

  1. Beauprez JJ, De Mey M, Soetaert WK. Microbial succinic acid production: natural versus metabolic engineered producers. Process Biochem. 2010;45(7):1103–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdel-Rahman MA, Tashiro Y, Sonomoto K. Lactic acid production from lignocellulose-derived sugars using lactic acid bacteria: overview and limits. J Biotechnol. 2011;156(4):286–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis R, Tao L, Tan ECD, Biddy MJ, Beckham GT, Scarlata C, Jacobson J, Cafferty K, Ross J, Lukas J, et al. Process design and economics for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrocarbons: dilute-acid and enzymatic deconstruction of biomass to sugars and biological conversion of sugars to hydrocarbons. In.: NREL; 2013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lynd LR, Zyl WHV, McBride JE, Laser M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005;16(5):577–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumer-Schuette SE, Brown SD, Sander KB, Bayer EA, Kataeva I, Zurawski JV, Conway JM, Adams MWW, Kelly RM. Thermophilic lignocellulose deconstruction. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38(3):393–448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Schuster BG, Chinn MS. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic feedstocks for ethanol fuel production. Bioenerg Res. 2013;6(2):416–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nazina TN, Tourova TP, Poltaraus AB, Novikova EV, Grigoryan AA, Ivanova AE, Lysenko AM, Petrunyaka VV, Osipov GA, Belyaev SS, et al. Taxonomic study of aerobic thermophilic bacilli: descriptions of Geobacillus subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from petroleum reservoirs and transfer of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bacillus thermoleovorans, Bacillus kaustophilus, Bacillus thermoglucosidasius and Bacillus thermodenitrificans to Geobacillus as the new combinations G. stearothermophilus, G. thermocatenulatus, G. thermoleovorans, G. kaustophilus, G. thermoglucosidasius and G. thermodenitrificans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51(2):433–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Rastogi G, Bhalla A, Adhikari A, Bischoff KM, Hughes SR, Christopher LP, Sani RK. Characterization of thermostable cellulases produced by Bacillus and Geobacillus strains. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(22):8798–806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhalla A, Bischoff KM, Uppugundla N, Balan V, Sani RK. Novel thermostable end-oxylanase cloned and expressed from bacterium Geobacillus sp. WSUCF1. Biores Technol. 2014;165(C):314–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. De Maayer P, Brumm PJ, Mead DA, Cowan DA. Comparative analysis of the Geobacillus hemicellulose utilization locus reveals a highly variable target for improved hemicellulolysis. BMC Genom. 2014;15(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tai SK, Lin HPP, Kuo J, Liu JK. Isolation and characterization of a cellulolytic Geobacillus thermoleovorans T4 strain from sugar refinery waste water. Extremophiles. 2004;8(5):345–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Rastogi G, Muppidi G, Gurram R, Adhikari A, Bischoff K, Hughes S, Apel W, Bang S, Dixon D, Sani R. Isolation and characterization of cellulose-degrading bacteria from the deep subsurface of the Homestake gold mine, Lead, South Dakota, USA. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;36(4):585–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ng IS, Li CW, Yeh YF, Chen PT, Chir JL, Ma CH, Yu SM, Ho THD, Tong CG. A novel endo-glucanase from the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus sp. 70PC53 with high activity and stability over a broad range of temperatures. Extremophiles. 2009;13(3):425–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cripps RE, Eley K, Leak DJ, Rudd B, Taylor M, Todd M, Boakes S, Martin S, Atkinson T. Metabolic engineering of Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius for high yield ethanol production. Metab Eng. 2009;11(6):398–408.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Bartosiak-Jentys J, Hussein AH, Lewis CJ, Leak DJ. Modular system for assessment of glycosyl hydrolase secretion in Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Microbiology (United Kingdom). 2013;159(PART7):1267–75.Google Scholar
  16. Kananavičiute R, Čitavičius D. Genetic engineering of Geobacillus spp. J Microbiol Methods. 2015;111:31–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bosma EF, van de Weijer AHP, Daas MJA, van der Oost J, de Vos WM, van Kranenburg R. Isolation and screening of thermophilic bacilli from compost for electro transformation and fermentation: characterization of bacillus smithii ET 138 as a new biocatalyst. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(5):1874–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Studholme DJ. Some (bacilli) like it hot: genomics of Geobacillus species. Microb Biotechnol. 2015;8(1):40–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fong J, Svenson C, Nakasugi K, Leong C, Bowman J, Chen B, Glenn D, Neilan B, Rogers P. Isolation and characterization of two novel ethanol-tolerant facultative-anaerobic thermophilic bacteria strains from waste compost. Extremophiles. 2006;10(5):363–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sizova MV, Izquierdo JA, Panikov NS, Lynd LR. Cellulose- and xylan-degrading thermophilic anaerobic bacteria from biocompost. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(7):2282–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Muyzer G, Teske A, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW. Phylogenetic relationships of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments. Arch Microbiol. 1995;164(3):165–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview version 2-A multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis work bench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(9):1189–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25.Google Scholar
  26. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor MP, Eley KL, Martin S, Tuffin MI, Burton SG, Cowan DA. Thermophilic ethanologenesis: future prospects for second-generation bioethanol production. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27(7):398–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Narumi I, Sawakami K, Nakamoto S, Nakayama N, Yanagisawa T, Takahashi N, Kihara H. A newly isolated Bacillus stearotheromophilus K1041 and its transformation by electroporation. Biotechnol Tech. 1992;6(1):83–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang YJ, Sapra R, Joyner D, Hazen TC, Myers S, Reichmuth D, Blanch H, Keasling JD. Analysis of metabolic pathways and fluxes in a newly discovered thermophilic and ethanol-tolerant geobacillus strain. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102(5):1377–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor MP, Esteban CD, Leak DJ. Development of a versatile shuttle vector for gene expression in Geobacillus spp. Plasmid. 2008;60(1):45–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Blanchard K, Robic S, Matsumura I. Transformable facultative thermophile Geobacillus stearothermophilus NUB3621 as a host strain for metabolic engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(15):6715–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin PP, Rabe KS, Takasumi JL, Kadisch M, Arnold FH, Liao JC. Isobutanol production at elevated temperatures in thermophilic Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius. Metab Eng. 2014;24:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bartosiak-Jentys J, Eley K, Leak DJ. Application of pheB as a reporter gene for Geobacillus spp, enabling qualitative colony screening and quantitative analysis of promoter strength. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(16):5945–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Mishima M, Iwata K, Nara K, Matsui T, Shigeno T, Omori T. Cultivation characteristics of denitrification by thermophilic Geobacillus sp. strain TDN01. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2009;55(2):81–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Takaku H, Kodaira S, Kimoto A, Nashimoto M, Takagi M. Microbial communities in the garbage composting with rice hull as an amendment revealed by culture-dependent and -independent approaches. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006;101(1):42–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Tian W, Sun Q, Xu D, Zhang Z, Chen D, Li C, Shen Q, Shen B. Succession of bacterial communities during composting process as detected by 16S rRNA clone libraries analysis. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2013;78:58–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryckeboer J, Mergaert J, Coosemans J, Deprins K, Swings J. Microbiological aspects of biowaste during composting in a monitored compost bin. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(1):127–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Shulami S, Shenker O, Langut Y, Lavid N, Gat O, Zaide G, Zehavi A, Sonenshein AL, Shoham Y. Multiple regulatory mechanisms control the expression of the Geobacillus stearothermophilus gene for extracellular xylanase. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(37):25957–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Murciano Martínez P, Bakker R, Harmsen P, Gruppen H, Kabel M. Importance of acid or alkali concentration on the removal of xylan and lignin for enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;64:88–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sonenshein AL. CodY, a global regulator of stationary phase and virulence in Gram-positive bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(2):203–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016