- Open Access
Xylan extraction from pretreated sugarcane bagasse using alkaline and enzymatic approaches
© The Author(s) 2017
- Received: 7 September 2017
- Accepted: 26 November 2017
- Published: 7 December 2017
New biorefinery concepts are necessary to drive industrial use of lignocellulose biomass components. Xylan recovery before enzymatic hydrolysis of the glucan component is a way to add value to the hemicellulose fraction, which can be used in papermaking, pharmaceutical, and food industries. Hemicellulose removal can also facilitate subsequent cellulolytic glucan hydrolysis.
Sugarcane bagasse was pretreated with an alkaline-sulfite chemithermomechanical process to facilitate subsequent extraction of xylan by enzymatic or alkaline procedures. Alkaline extraction methods yielded 53% (w/w) xylan recovery. The enzymatic approach provided a limited yield of 22% (w/w) but produced the xylan with the lowest contamination with lignin and glucan components. All extracted xylans presented arabinosyl side groups and absence of acetylation. 2D-NMR data suggested the presence of O-methyl-glucuronic acid and p-coumarates only in enzymatically extracted xylan. Xylans isolated using the enzymatic approach resulted in products with molecular weights (Mw) lower than 6 kDa. Higher Mw values were detected in the alkali-isolated xylans. Alkaline extraction of xylan provided a glucan-enriched solid readily hydrolysable with low cellulase loads, generating hydrolysates with a high glucose/xylose ratio.
Hemicellulose removal before enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulosic fraction proved to be an efficient manner to add value to sugarcane bagasse biorefining. Xylans with varied yield, purity, and structure can be obtained according to the extraction method. Enzymatic extraction procedures produce high-purity xylans at low yield, whereas alkaline extraction methods provided higher xylan yields with more lignin and glucan contamination. When xylan extraction is performed with alkaline methods, the residual glucan-enriched solid seems suitable for glucose production employing low cellulase loadings.
- Cellulose hydrolysis
- Alkaline-sulfite pretreatment
Sugarcane bagasse is a valuable lignocellulosic material to produce fuels and chemicals because it is site-available at the current sugar and ethanol mills . However, advanced chemical and material applications of sugarcane bagasse components require suitable pretreatment technologies that facilitate efficient valorization of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin fractions. Several pretreatment methods have been developed to open the compact lignocellulose ultrastructure and make separations or conversions easier [2, 3].
The alkaline-sulfite chemithermomechanical treatment is considered suitable for this purpose because it is a delignification process that retains most of the cellulose and a significant fraction of hemicellulose in the pretreated solids. In addition, lignocellulose pretreatment with sulfite ions makes residual lignin sulfonated and hydrophilic, increasing the swelling and porosity of the cell walls [4, 5]. By properly controlling reaction time, temperature, and pH, it is possible to decrease the lignocellulose recalcitrance through a mild sulfite pretreatment process [4, 6–10].
In previous studies, efficient sugar production from alkaline-sulfite-pretreated sugarcane bagasse was obtained by simultaneous enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses [5, 9, 11]. However, yeasts currently used in industrial fermentation processes do not efficiently ferment the blend of hexoses and pentoses, resulting in carbohydrate losses in the final product [12, 13].
Considering the characteristics of the alkaline-sulfite pretreatment, we envisage that the residual hemicellulose is susceptible to be isolated in its polymeric form with commercial applicability. Current examples of hemicellulose uses include packaging films, coating food products, biomedical products, and additives for cellulose fibers [14–19].
Hemicelluloses are the second most abundant renewable material produced by plants, and xylan is the major hemicellulose present in sugarcane bagasse secondary cell walls. Xylan is composed of an anhydrous xylose backbone with a high degree of substitution, which has a direct effect on its properties [20–23]. The impact of hemicelluloses properties, such as molecular weight and degree of substitution for different applications, is widely discussed in the literature. Research has shown that hemicelluloses with a high degree of uronic acid or other side chains are not easily adsorbed onto pulp fibers [24–26]. However, which molecular weight range of the hemicelluloses is more effective for adsorption on pulp fibers remains in question. For example, Magaton et al.  reported that higher molecular weight hemicelluloses are more effective than those with lower molecular weight, while Muguet et al.  found that smaller molecules tend to form large aggregates and thus deposit more efficiently onto fibers. A more specific backbone length of at least 15 unsubstituted xylosyl residues was determined for xylan adsorption on bacterial cellulose .
Methods for xylan extraction are chosen based on compromises among extraction yield, selectivity, and polymerization degree of xylans . Polymeric xylans suitable for biopolymer applications are generally pre-extracted from raw lignocellulosic materials in alkaline solutions; however, lignin fractions are also solubilized . Recently, Chimphango et al.  and Carvalho et al.  tested specific extraction procedures from untreated sugarcane bagasse. Traditional hemicellulose extraction methods include lignocellulose pre-delignification with sodium chlorite followed by alkaline extraction, which provides high yields of polymeric xylan . A second traditional method is based on direct alkaline extraction followed by ethanol precipitation of xylan, which is a simpler procedure but usually provides a lower yield . Both methods use 40% (w/w) NaOH for xylan extraction at different reaction times and temperatures. The use of these methods for direct extraction of xylan from sugarcane bagasse indicated a higher yield when bagasse was pre-delignified . Even so, the purities of the isolated xylans were low, since 16–28% of residual lignin was detected in the extracted xylans . Other studies combine enzymatic treatments with alkaline extraction to remove xylan and xylo-oligosaccharides from lignocellulosic materials [33–35]. In these studies, high enzyme loads resulted in the extraction of xylans with low molecular weight. Aguedo et al.  used xylanases for enzymatic extraction of arabinoxylans from wheat bran, reaching low yields (8%) of a high-molecular-weight product (5–12.5 kDa). Remond et al.  studied the effect of wheat straw pretreatment with ammonia and subsequent endo-xylanase (purified from Thermobacillus xylanilyticus) removal of xylan. The authors found that the maximum xylan solubilization was 57% when the process used 350 IU xylanase per gram of pulp.
The current work used alkaline-sulfite-pretreated sugarcane bagasse as a feedstock for xylan extraction instead of directly recovering the polymer from untreated lignocellulose. Here, we compare two traditional alkaline extraction procedures with an enzymatic extraction method performed at mild alkaline conditions. The goal is to use the enzymatic approach to prepare the purest xylans under mild alkaline extraction conditions. All process steps were designed in a biorefinery concept where xylan is recovered before enzymatic hydrolysis of the glucan component, which can add value to the hemicellulose fraction, and provides a pentose-free hydrolysate suitable for conventional industrially developed fermentation processes.
Beechwood xylan was obtained from Megazyme (lot 141101a) and sugarcane bagasse was supplied by a sugar and ethanol mill located in São Paulo state, Brazil. The analytical grade sugars glucose, cellobiose, arabinose, xylose, and glucuronic acid were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich at purity levels above 99% and were used as standards in sugar analysis. Commercial xylanase (Luminase-PB 200, BASF) was used for enzymatic extraction of xylan. Commercial cellulases were used in hydrolysis experiments (cellulases from Trichoderma reesei ATCC 26921 and Novozym 188 β-glucosidase, both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich). Sugarcane bagasse was provided by a sugar and ethanol mill located at the São Paulo state, Brazil, which uses a mix of commercial hybrids of sugarcane cultivars. The sample was obtained just after crushing for juice extraction. Resulting bagasse was air-dried and stored with approximately 12% humidity.
Alkaline-sulfite chemithermomechanical pretreatment of sugar cane bagasse
Sugarcane bagasse was submitted to alkaline-sulfite pretreatment as described by Mendes et al. , avoiding the step of extensive washing of the pretreated material, which was named unwashed solids. The alkaline-sulfite load used in the pretreatment was set to 5% NaOH and 10% Na2SO3, both expressed as gram of reagent per 100 g of oven-dry sugarcane bagasse.
The hemicellulose fractions were extracted from alkaline-sulfite-pretreated sugarcane bagasse using two previously described methods [31, 32]. Both methods were based on alkaline hemicellulose extraction, being previously evaluated for direct xylan extraction from untreated sugarcane bagasse . In summary, the Lopez method was based on GAX extraction with 40% NaOH (w/w) at 60 °C for 2 h , while the Hoije method uses the same alkaline charge but a lower temperature (25 °C) and a longer extraction period (16 h). The Hoije method also differs from the Lopez method by using a previous acid-chlorite delignification . Enzymatic extraction of hemicellulose was performed by treating the alkaline-sulfite-pretreated sugarcane bagasse with commercial xylanase with a dosage of 8 IU/g of pretreated bagasse at 5% consistency in 50 mM phosphate buffer at pH 8 and 50 °C. During the enzymatic treatment, the samples were mixed at 120 rpm for 24 h. After the treatment, the material was heated to 90 °C for 15 min to inactivate the enzymes, the residual solids were removed by filtration, and xylans were recovered after freeze-drying of the soluble fraction .
Chemical characterization of the samples
Untreated and pretreated sugarcane bagasse were extracted with 95% ethanol for 6 h in a Soxhlet apparatus before characterization. All samples were characterized based on acid hydrolysis procedures previously published . Concentrations of monomeric sugars and acetic acid were determined by HPLC using a BIO-RAD HPX87H column at 45 °C eluted at 0.6 mL/min with 5 mM sulfuric acid detected with a temperature-controlled RI detector. The uronic acid contents of beechwood xylan and sugarcane-extracted xylans were determined using the carbazole–sulfuric acid method, as previously described by Brienzo et al. .
2D-NMR characterization of the samples used approximately 50 mg of xylan. Samples were dissolved in 0.75 mL of DMSO-d 6. NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a Bruker AVANCE III 500 MHz instrument equipped with a cryogenically cooled 5 mm TCI gradient probe with inverse geometry (proton coils closest to the sample). HSQC (heteronuclear single quantum coherence) experiments used Bruker’s ‘hsqcetgpsisp2.2’ pulse program (adiabatic-pulsed version) with spectral widths of 5000 Hz (from 10 to 0 ppm) and 23,843 Hz (from 165 to 0 ppm) for the 1H- and 13C-dimensions. The number of collected complex points was 2048 for the 1H-dimension, with a recycle delay of 1 s. The number of transients was 64, and 256 time increments were always recorded in the 13C-dimension. The 1 J CH used was 145 Hz. Processing used typical matched Gaussian apodization in the 1H dimension and squared cosine-bell apodization in the 13C dimension. Prior to Fourier transformation, the data matrixes were zero-filled up to 1024 points in the 13C-dimension. The central solvent peak was used as an internal reference (δ C 39.5; δ H 2.49). HSQC correlation signals were assigned by comparing with the literature [37, 38].
The molar mass distribution of the xylans was determined by size exclusion chromatography in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8.0 eluted at 0.3 mL/min, 30 °C, using a Biogel P30 column (150 mm × 15 mm I.D.). Samples were dissolved in water, and the concentration was adjusted to give the same absorbance for all samples after the phenol–sulfuric acid reaction (absorbance = 2.0). A total of 400 μL of sample was applied to the column, and eluted fractions were assayed using a phenol–sulfuric acid reagent to determine total sugars . The molar mass markers used in the column system consisted of glucose, cobalamin, dextran T6 (Pharmacosmos), and protein standards (lysozyme, carbonic anhydrase from Sigma).
The solubility of xylans was tested by mixing 5% (w/v) of the solid fractions with water under 120 rpm agitation at 60 °C for 6 h. Prepared suspensions were centrifuged for 20 min at 23,600×g, and the xylan content in the supernatant was determined by converting it into the monomeric sugars by acid hydrolysis  followed by monomer determination by HPLC, as previously described. Total concentrations of xylose were recorded and used to calculate the xylan solubility in water.
Saccharification of residual solids with commercial cellulases
Glucan and xylan hydrolysis of alkaline-sulfite-pretreated bagasse, before and after xylan extraction, was assayed at 5% consistency in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.8 (with sodium azide 0.01%) at 45 °C under agitation at 120 rpm. Commercial cellulases at enzyme loads of 2.5 FPU/g of glucan and 5 IU β-glucosidase/g of glucan were used. Hydrolysates were sampled along hydrolysis over 72 h and were analyzed for glucose and xylose contents by HPLC as previously described. Data were reported as glucan and xylan conversion levels based on the monomers released to the solution and the original amounts of glucan and xylan from each sample.
Alkaline-sulfite pretreatment and xylan extraction
Chemical composition of sugarcane bagasse before and after alkaline-sulfite pretreatment, and glucurono-arabinoxylans (GAX) extracted from the pretreated material
Components (g/100 g of sample on dry basis)
Unwashed pretreated bagasse
Alkaline-extracted GAX (Hoije method)
Alkaline-extracted GAX (Lopez method)
Enzymatically extracted GAX
21.1 ± 0.4
13.6 ± 0.2
8.4 ± 0.1
10.2 ± 0.2
40.4 ± 0.2
45.2 ± 0.3
5.23 ± 0.1
4.4 ± 0.1
2.2 ± 0.1
22.4 ± 0.3
23.2 ± 0.3
61.7 ± 0.8
64.2 ± 0.2
72.5 ± 0.1
2.6 ± 0.1
2.8 ± 0.1
7.7 ± 0.1
6.8 ± 0.1
11.5 ± 0.8
Uronic acid groups
2.5 ± 0.2
2.4 ± 0.4
6.5 ± 0.1
5.7 ± 0.1
13.3 ± 0.8
3.3 ± 0.9
0.2 ± 0.0
4.5 ± 0.5
5.4 ± 0.1
Xylan structures present in sugarcane bagasse are mainly glucurono-arabinoxylans (GAX) [20, 22, 41]. Therefore, GAX contents were calculated as the sum of xylan (Xyl), arabinosyl (Ara), acetyl (Ac), and glucuronic acid (Uro) residues. GAX contents in the pretreated and untreated materials were quite similar, at 29–31%, respectively (Table 1). Xylose was the most abundant sugar of the pretreated solids, representing 23.2%. In addition, arabinosyl (2.8%) and glucuronic acid (2.4%) side groups were important components in pretreated solids. In contrast, acetyl groups were almost completely removed after pretreatment, decreasing from 3.3% in the untreated bagasse to 0.2% in the pretreated material.
The unwashed pretreated bagasse was used for GAX extraction via alkaline and enzymatic methods. The alkaline methods (Lopez and Hoije procedures) provide high hemicellulose recovery yield, preserving the hemicellulose polymeric form . The enzymatic method was attempted to provide a final product with a higher purity .
Glucurono-arabinoxylans (GAX) crude yields, mass balance for GAX components, and recovery percentages from alkaline-sulfite-pretreated sugarcane bagasse
Recovered material or component (g/100 g of original bagasse)
Alkaline-extracted GAX (Hoije method)
Alkaline-extracted GAX (Lopez method)
Enzymatically extracted GAX
Uronic acid groups
GAX recovery (%)
Extraction of GAX assisted by endo-xylanase resulted in low yield (22%), likely due to mild reaction conditions (pH 8) and the low xylanase accessibility to the xylan backbone, even after sugarcane bagasse pretreatment. The lignin in the pretreated bagasse can also decrease the xylanase action owing to non-specific adsorption of the enzyme on the lignin surface and to enzyme inhibition by soluble products generated during the pretreatment, such as sugars and phenolic compounds [44, 45]. Despite low extraction yield, the enzymatic extraction method provided the GAX with the lowest contamination with lignin and glucan (Tables 1, 2). For example, GAX extracted using alkaline methods contained significant residual lignin (8–10%) and glucan (4–5%), whereas enzymatically extracted GAX contained less than 4% lignin and only 2.2% glucan. The color appearances of the prepared GAXs were also substantially different among samples, with enzymatically extracted GAX as a white powder contrasting with dark-brown powders of alkaline-extracted GAXs (Table 1).
Characterization of isolated xylans
The chemical compositions of the extracted GAXs (Table 1) permitted estimations of the molar ratios of side groups in the GAX backbone. The arabinose/xylose ratio in GAX contained in pretreated sugar cane bagasse (0.12) was almost the same in alkaline-extracted GAXs (0.12 and 0.11 in the Hoije and Lopez methods, respectively). The uronic acid/xylose ratios diminished in the alkaline-extracted GAXs (0.09, 0.08, and 0.06 in pretreated bagasse, and GAXs from Hoije and Lopez methods, respectively), suggesting that the high NaOH load (40%, m/m) in the extraction procedure removed appendage groups from GAX (especially uronic acids). In contrast, the enzymatically extracted GAX presented increased arabinose/xylose and uronic acid/xylose ratios (0.16 and 0.13, respectively), likely because the procedure employed a low alkaline charge, and the commercial xylanase lacks accessory enzymes able to remove appendage groups from the xylan backbone .
Signals for residual lignin could also be observed in the HSQC spectra of the three GAX samples but only after the amplification (16×) of the signal (see insets of Fig. 2). The main cross-signals in the aromatic regions of the HSQC spectra corresponded to the different lignin units and to the p-coumaric (PCA) acid. Signals from guaiacyl (G) and syringyl (S) units, together with lower amounts of signals for p-hydroxyphenyl (H) lignin units, were observed in the spectra of the GAX isolated using the Hoije method, with an S:G:H composition of 44:50:6 and an S/G ratio of ~ 0.9 (Fig. 2a). However, mostly signals from H- and S-lignin units could be observed in the GAX isolated using the Lopes method, with only traces of signals for G-lignin, with an S:G:H composition of 54:15:31 and an S/G ratio of 3.6 (Fig. 2b). Interestingly, the GAX isolated by enzymatic treatment presented signals from S- and G-lignin units (S/G ratio of ~ 1.9), together with some signals from residual PCA, suggesting PCA retention owing to the mild extraction procedure. Significant amounts of signals from proteins, most likely arising from the xylanases used in the isolation process, could also be clearly distinguished in the spectrum of the enzymatically extracted GAX (Fig. 2c).
The solubility in water of the isolated GAXs was determined and compared with that of beechwood xylan, a commercial xylan with a high degree of substitution (9.4% of uronic acids and 6.9% of other sugars) (http://www.megazyme.com). Beechwood xylan presented the highest solubility in water (2.18 g/L), followed by the enzymatically extracted GAX (0.77 g/L) and the alkaline-extracted GAXs (0.52 and 0.28 g/L for the Hoije and Lopez methods, respectively). The highest solubility in water of the sugarcane bagasse GAX corresponded to the polymer with the lowest molar mass and the highest substitution degree as well as the lowest lignin content (enzymatically extracted GAX). Upon comparing the two alkaline-extracted GAXs, which presented similar molar mass distributions and branching, the presence of residual lignin and its structural characteristics seems to determine the differences in solubility in aqueous media . In fact, the less-soluble GAX (obtained using the Lopez method) exhibited the highest residual lignin content (Table 1), and a lignin structure including significant amounts of more hydrophobic H units (Fig. 2b).
Enzymatic conversion of residual glucan
Chemical composition of residual solids after sugarcane bagasse pretreatment and GAX extraction by varied methods
Residual solids after GAX extraction
Crude yield (%)
Arabinosyl groups (%)
7.2 ± 0.7
74.2 ± 0.4
14.7 ± 0.2
0.5 ± 0.1
10.5 ± 0.4
78.9 ± 0.4
9.2 ± 0.2
0.3 ± 0.0
15.4 ± 0.2
50.8 ± 0.6
22.1 ± 0.2
2.3 ± 0.0
The glucan component from the residual solids after GAX extraction using the Hoije method was promptly converted to glucose, even with a low cellulase dosage (70% glucan conversion after 72 h), while for the other samples, a maximum of 40% glucan conversion was attained (Fig. 4a). The varied performance of the solid residue from the Hoije method can be associated with the pre-delignification step applied over the pretreated bagasse. This process decreased the lignin content in the residual solids to 7%, effectively increasing the accessibility of the enzymes to the cellulose microfibrils. In contrast, the solid residues obtained after GAX extraction by the Lopez and the enzymatic methods presented higher residual lignin contents (10 and 15%, respectively).
Figure 4b indicates that xylans remaining in the residual solids were still converted to xylose by the cellulase cocktail, which presents high xylanase activities [44, 50, 51]. Xylan conversion to xylose from the solid residues resulting from GAX extraction was low (40 and 25% for alkaline and enzymatically extracted residues, respectively), probably associated with the low enzyme dosage used in the saccharification experiments.
Mass balance for the sugarcane bagasse components
New biorefinery concepts are necessary to drive industrial use of lignocellulose biomass components. Xylan recovery before enzymatic hydrolysis of the glucan component is a way to add value to the hemicellulose fraction [19, 52]. This biorefinery design also avoids changes to the currently established hexose fermentation processes since final hydrolysates produced from sugarcane bagasse will contain mainly glucose instead of a mixture of glucose and xylose . Mass balance for bagasse components permits an overall view of each component fate during processing (Additional file 1: Figures S1–S5).
Over 90% of the xylan was preserved in the sugarcane bagasse after chemithermomechanical pretreatment avoiding excessive washing of the pretreated solids. Residual xylans were extracted by three processes with different yields and purity levels. The xylans isolated using alkaline methods used high alkali charge and produced high-molecular-weight xylans, with high Ara/Xyl ratios and with 8–10% residual lignin. In contrast, the enzymatic extraction process took a light-colored and low-molecular-weight product, almost free of residual lignin, and Ara/Xyl and Uro/Xyl ratios higher than alkaline xylans. While enzymatic extraction had the advantage of producing high-purity xylans, the yield and degree of polymerization were relatively low. This product could be a highly attractive material for deposition onto cellulosic pulps for increasing their xylan content, thereby providing added value to xylan-bagasse. The overall mass balance of the process shows that by removing xylan in high yield (alkaline methods), the glucan-enriched solid residue can be readily hydrolyzed with low cellulase loads, generating hydrolysates with a high glucose/xylose ratio, suggesting the possibility of direct use in conventional hexose fermentation processes.
DS performed experiments, data interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. JR, AG, and JCR designed and performed NMR studies, data interpretation, and discussion. AF and AMFM conceived the study, participated in data interpretation, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors thank José M. Silva and José C. Tavares for technical assistance. This work was supported by FAPESP (Contract Numbers 08/56256-5 and 14/06923-6), CNPq, and CAPES. Daniela Sporck and Felipe Reinose thank CAPES for their student fellowships.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Santos LV, Grassi MCB, Gallardo JCM, Pirolla RAS, Caldero LL, Carvalho-Netto OV, Parreiras LS, Camargo ELO, Drezza AL, Missawa SK, Teixeira GS, Lunardi I, Bressiani J, Pereira GAG. Second-generation ethanol: the need is becoming a reality. Ind Biotechnol. 2016;12:40–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao X, Zhang L, Liu D. Biomass recalcitrance part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin. 2012;6:465–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJA. Critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresour Technol. 2016;200:1008–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Wang GS, Gleisner R. Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:2411–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mendes FM, Siqueira G, Carvalho W, Ferraz A, Milagres AMF. Enzymatic hydrolysis of chemithermomechanically pretreated sugarcane bagasse and samples with reduced initial lignin content. Biotechnol Prog. 2011;27:395–401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koch G, Rose B, Patt R, Kordsachia O. Topochemical investigations on delignification of Picea abies [L.] Karst. during alkaline sulfite (ASA) and bisulfite pulping by scanning UV microspectrophotometry. Holzforschung. 2003;57:611–8.Google Scholar
- Konn J, Pranovich A, Holmbom B. Dissolution of fibre material in alkaline pre-treatment and refining of spruce CTMP process chemistry. Holzforschung. 2006;60:32–9.Google Scholar
- Liu H, Pang B, Wang HS, Li HM, Lu J, Niu MH. Optimization of alkaline sulfite pretreatment and comparative study with sodium hydroxide pretreatment for improving enzymatic digestibility of corn stover. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:3229–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laurito-Friend DF, Mendes FM, Reinoso FM, Ferraz A, Milagres AMF. Sugarcane hybrids with original low lignin contents and high field productivity are useful to reach high glucose yields from bagasse. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015;75:65–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu JY, Chandra MS, Gu F, Gleisner R, Reiner R, Sessions J, Marrs G, Gao J, Anderson D. Using sulfite chemistry for robust bioconversion of Douglas-fir forest residue to bioethanol at high titer and lignosulfonate: a pilot-scale evaluation. Bioresour Technol. 2015;179:390–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mendes FM, Laurito DF, Bazzeggio M, Ferraz A, Milagres AMF. Enzymatic digestion of alkaline-sulfite pretreated sugar cane bagasse and its correlation with the chemical and structural changes occurring during the pretreatment step. Biotechnol Prog. 2013;29:890–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oreb M, Dietz H, Farwick A, Boles E. Novel strategies to improve co-fermentation of pentoses with d-glucose by recombinant yeast strains in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Bioengineered. 2012;3:347–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paulova L, Patakova P, Branska B, Rychtera M, Melzoch K. Lignocellulosic ethanol: technology design and its impact on process efficiency. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:1091–107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dahlman O, Sjoberg J, Jansson UB, Larsson PO. Effects of surface hardwood xylan on the quality of softwood pulps. Nord Pulp Pap Res J. 2003;18:310–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Henriksson A, Gatenholm P. Controlled assembly of glucuronoxylans onto cellulose fibers. Holzforschung. 2001;55:494–502.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muguet MCS, Pedrazzi C, Colodette JL. Xylan deposition onto eucalypt pulp fibers during oxygen delignification. Holzforschung. 2011;65:605–12.Google Scholar
- Ebringerová A. Structural diversity and application potential of hemicelluloses. Macromol Symp. 2006;232:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Yuan Z, Mao C, Hou Q, Li K. Removal of hemicelluloses by NaOH pre-extraction from aspen chips prior to mechanical pulping. BioResources. 2011;6:3469–80.Google Scholar
- Egüés I, Stepan AM, Eceiza A, Toriz G, Gatenholm P, Labidi J. Corncob arabinoxylan for new materials. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;102:12–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun JX, Sun XF, Sun RC, Su YQ. Fractional extraction and structural characterization of sugarcane bagasse hemicelluloses. Carbohydr Polym. 2004;56:195–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu F, Sun JX, Liu CF, Sun RC. Comparative study of alkali- and acidic organic solvent-soluble hemicellulosic polysaccharides from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydr Res. 2006;341:253–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brienzo M, Siqueira AF, Milagres AMF. Search for optimum conditions of sugarcane bagasse hemicellulose extraction. Biochem Eng J. 2009;46:199–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chimphango AFA, Van Zyl WH, Gorgens JF. Isolation, characterization and enzymatic modification of water soluble xylans from Eucalyptus grandis wood and sugarcane bagasse. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2012;87:1419–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ren JL, Peng F, Sun RC, Kennedy JF. Influence of hemicellulosic derivatives on the sulfate kraft pulp. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;75:338–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Silva TCF, Colodette JL, Lucia LA, de Oliveira RC, Oliveira FN, Silva LHM. Adsorption of chemically modified xylans on eucalyptus pulp and its effect on the pulp physical properties. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:1138–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gomes KR, Chimphango FA, Gorgens JF. Modifying solubility of polymeric xylan extracted from Eucalyptus grandis and sugarcane bagasse by suitable side chain removing enzymes. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;131:177–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Magaton AS, Colodette JL, Pilo-Veloso D, Gomide JL. Behavior of eucalyptus wood xylans across kraft cooking. J Wood Chem Technol. 2011;31:58–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kabel MA, van den Borne H, Vicken JP, Voragen AGJ, Schols HA. Structural differences of xylans affect their interaction with cellulose. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;69:94–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hutterer C, Schild G, Kliba G, Potthast A. Lignin profiling in extracted xylans by size-exclusion chromatography. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;20:821–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho DM, Martínez-Abad A, Evtuguin DV, Colodette JL, Lindström ME, Vilaplanaa F, Sevastyanova O. Isolation and characterization of acetylated glucuronoarabinoxylan from sugarcane bagasse and straw. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;156:223–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoije A, Grondahl M, Tømmeraas K, Gatenholm P. Isolation and characterization of physicochemical and material properties of arabinoxylans from barley husks. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;61:266–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Lopez S, Tissot M, Delmas M. Integrated cereal straw valorization by an alkaline pre-extraction of hemicellulose prior to soda-anthraquinone pulping, case study of barley straw. Biomass Bioenergy. 1996;10:201–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rémond C, Aubry N, Crônier D, Noël S, Martel F, Roge B, Rakotoarivonina H, Debeire P, Chabbert B. Combination of ammonia and xylanase pretreatments: impact on enzymatic xylan and cellulose recovery from wheat straw. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:6712–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hakkala TK, Liitia T, Suurnakki A. Enzyme-aided alkaline extraction of oligosaccharides and polymeric xylan from hardwood kraft pulp. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;93:102–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aguedo M, Fougnies C, Dermience M, Richel A. Extraction by three processes of arabinoxylans from wheat bran and characterization of the fractions obtained. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;105:317–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferraz A, Baeza J, Rodriguez J, Freer J. Estimating the chemical composition of biodegraded pine and eucalyptus wood by DRIFT spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:201–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim H, Ralph J. A gel-state 2D-NMR method for plant cell wall profiling and analysis: a model study with the amorphous cellulose and xylan from ball-milled cotton linters. RSC Adv. 2014;4:7549.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- del Río JC, Lino AG, Colodette JL, Lima CF, Gutiérrez A, Martínez AT, Lu F, Ralph J, Rencoret J. Differences in the chemical structures of the lignins from sugarcane bagasse and straw. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015;81:322–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dubois M, Gilles K, Hamilton J, Rebers P, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substances. Anal Chem. 1976;28:350–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D. Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42623. 2008.Google Scholar
- Costa THF, Vega-Sánchez ME, Milagres AMF, Scheller HV, Ferraz A. Tissue-specific distribution of hemicelluloses in six different sugarcane hybrids as related to cell wall recalcitrance. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wei L, Shrestha A, Tu M, Adhikari S. Effects of surfactant on biochemical and hydrothermal conversion of softwood hemicellulose to ethanol and furan derivatives. Process Biochem. 2011;46:1785–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chandra RP, Gourlay K, Kim C, Saddler JN. Enhancing hemicellulosic recovery and the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by adding lignosulfonates during the two-stage steam pretreatment of poplar. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2015;3:986–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kilburn D, Maximenko V, Bura R, Markov A, Skomsrovsky A, Gusakov A, Sinitsyn A, Okunev O, Solovieva I, Saddler JN. Evaluation of cellulase preparations for hydrolysis of hardwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2006;129–132:528–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladish M. Inhibition of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2010;46:170–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biely P, Singh S, Puchart V. Towards enzymatic breakdown of complex plant xylan structures: state of the art. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:1260–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng GF, Ren J-L, Xu F, Bian J, Peng P, Sun R-C. Comparative study of hemicelluloses obtained by graded ethanol precipitation from sugarcane bagasse. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:6305–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buranov AU, Mazza G. Extraction and characterization of hemicelluloses from flax shives by different methods. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;79:17–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Westbuye P, Konke T, Glasser W, Gatenholm P. The influence of lignin on the self-assembly behavior of xylan rich fractions from birch (Betula pendula). Cellulose. 2007;14:603–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qing Q, Wyman CE. Hydrolysis of different chain length xylooliogmers by cellulase and hemicellulase. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:1359–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Valadares F, Gonçalves TA, Gonçalves DSPO, Segato F, Romanel E, Milagres AMF, Squina F, Ferraz A. Exploring glycoside hydrolases and accessory proteins from wood decay fungi to enhance sugarcane bagasse saccharification. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho DM, Sevastyanova O, Penna LS, Silva BP, Lindström ME, Colodette JL. Assessment of chemical transformations in eucalyptus, sugarcane bagasse and straw during hydrothermal, dilute acid, and alkaline pretreatments. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;73:118–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar