Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Pan-genome analyses of 24 Shewanella strains re-emphasize the diversification of their functions yet evolutionary dynamics of metal-reducing pathway

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Biotechnology for Biofuels201811:193

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1201-1

©  The Author(s) 2018

  • Received: 28 April 2018
  • Accepted: 10 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Shewanella strains are important dissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria which are widely distributed in diverse habitats. Despite efforts to genomically characterize Shewanella, knowledge of the molecular components, functional information and evolutionary patterns remain lacking, especially for their compatibility in the metal-reducing pathway. The increasing number of genome sequences of Shewanella strains offers a basis for pan-genome studies.

Results

A comparative pan-genome analysis was conducted to study genomic diversity and evolutionary relationships among 24 Shewanella strains. Results revealed an open pan-genome of 13,406 non-redundant genes and a core-genome of 1878 non-redundant genes. Selective pressure acted on the invariant members of core genome, in which purifying selection drove evolution in the housekeeping mechanisms. Shewanella strains exhibited extensive genome variability, with high levels of gene gain and loss during the evolution, which affected variable gene sets and facilitated the rapid evolution. Additionally, genes related to metal reduction were diversely distributed in Shewanella strains and evolved under purifying selection, which highlighted the basic conserved functionality and specificity of respiratory systems.

Conclusions

The diversity of genes present in the accessory and specific genomes of Shewanella strains indicates that each strain uses different strategies to adapt to diverse environments. Horizontal gene transfer is an important evolutionary force in shaping Shewanella genomes. Purifying selection plays an important role in the stability of the core-genome and also drives evolution in mtr–omc cluster of different Shewanella strains.

Keywords

  • Pan-genome
  • Shewanella
  • Metal-reducing
  • Evolution

Background

Shewanella are well known for their extensively respiratory versatility and widely distributed in a range of aquatic habitats [1, 2]. Currently, the genus Shewanella is composed of more than 50 species [1], over 20 of which have abilities to reduce metal [3–5]. Due to their metal-reducing capability, some members of Shewanella such as Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, Shewanella loihica and Shewanella putrefaciens have been recognized as useful tools for bioremediation [6–8]. They were used to bio-remediate toxic elements and heavy metals contamination [9], and serve as biocatalyst in microbial fuel cells to produce H2 [10]. Despite their close evolutionary relationship, Shewanella strains from diverse habitats have great differences in genetic content [11]. S. oneidensis MR-1, a well-studied model of Shewanella, discovered to have the capability of heavy metal reduction in lakes, is the first species of Shewanella to be sequenced and assembled [12]. Some genes identified in S. oneidensis MR-1, such as mtrBAC and omcA, are essential for metal reduction [13, 14], but the features of their variations are still poorly understood. S. putrefaciens W3-18-1, a kind of psychrophile having the ability to reduce metals, has different molecular mechanisms of iron reduction from S. oneidensis MR-1 [15]. S. piezotolerans WP3 living at elevated hydrostatic pressures [16], also shows diverse electron transport pathways from S. oneidensis MR-1, although they have a close evolutionary relationship [17].

The pan-genome analysis provides a systematic way to assess the genomic diversity and evolution across diverse organisms [18, 19]. The availability of whole genome sequences for a number of Shewanella strains makes it possible to examine both the pan and core genome and provides insights into gene clusters of metal reduction in other members of this genus. A series of genome analyses of Shewanella strains have demonstrated gene diversity of electron acceptors for respiration [11, 20–22]. Investigations into several Shewanella baltica isolates have been conducted to analyze the complete genomic sequences and expressed transcriptomes [23], but only a few of the lineages are considered in genetic exchange analysis. Genome analysis of 10 closely related Shewanella strains suggested that variations in expressed proteomes correlated positively with the extent of environmental adaptation, but adaptive evolution in the core components of other species has still not been well studied [24]. Genome-wide molecular selection analyses, designed to assess selection pressure across the entire core-genome of different strains of Shewanella have not been reported, and also no comprehensive reports have attempted to address the important role of selection functions in the diversification of the core-genome of Shewanella. Most studies focus on identification of electron transport system and genes which are essential to the different metabolism [25]. To date, the whole genome sequence of certain Shewanella strains have been sequenced and some of their genetic features well characterized. However, only a limited number of strains have been extensively studied, the metabolic and genetic diversity of many species remain unknown. Therefore, a comparative pan-genome analysis in Shewanella is very necessary to study evolution and genetic diversity.

In this study, we estimated both the sizes of pan and core genomes, functional features, phylogeny, and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) to characterize population diversity and determine the forces driving adaptive evolution in 24 Shewanella strains. In addition, we attempted to assess selection pressure and selection functions in the diversification across the single copy core genomes within this genus. Furthermore, genetic organization and evolution of mtr–omc clusters were investigated for their evolutionary patterns at the genomic level.

Results and discussion

Core and pan-genome of Shewanella

A large proportion (94%) of genes from 24 Shewanella strains were grouped into 7830 homologous clusters (Additional file 1: Table S1). The pan-genome possessed 13,406 gene families, members of gene families in these strains were divided into three categories (core, accessory, specific) based on their appearance in different genomes. Among these gene families, 1878 families existed in all 24 genomes and hence represented the core gene complements (core genome). And 1788 families from core genome harbored only one gene from each strain (single-copy core families). Although these strains shared a core gene set, there were individual differences among the subsets of genes. The 5801 families existed in only one genome comprising the unique genes or singletons (strain-specific genome) and the remaining 5727 families (accessory genome) were present in more than one, but not all 24 genomes. The number of non-redundant strain-specific genes across different genomes varied from 58 to 782, and S. piezotolerans WP3 had the largest number of unique gene families (782) while S. sp. MR-4 possessed the smallest number of unique gene families (58) (Fig. 1a). This was consistent with the previous study that S. piezotolerans WP3 had the largest genome size among the sequenced Shewanella genomes [26]. The large proportion of specific genes suggested that the Shewanella strains harbored a high level of genomic diversity and uniqueness of each strain, showing their ability to survive in different environments. The size of pan-genome got large unboundedly with the increase of new genomes even including 13,406 non-redundant genes (Fig. 1b), which indicated that the Shewanella pan-genome was still “open”. This open pan-genome showed great potential for discovering novel genes with more Shewanella strains sequenced. In contrast to the pan-genome, the size of core genome appeared to reach a steady-state approximation after including 1878 non-redundant genes. In addition, only 14% of the pan-genome was found to be kept constant, while the remaining 86% was variable across the strains, which indicated that the pan-genome exhibited a high level of genome variability.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Genomic diversity of strains in Shewanella. a Core and specific families of 24 Shewanella genomes. Each oval represents a strain and is colored according to its isolation site (blue: water, red: sediment and yellow: other). The number of orthologous coding sequences (core genome) shared by all strains is in the center. The number of specific families is in non-overlapping portions of each oval. b Increase and decrease in gene families in the pan-genome (red) and core genome (blue), respectively. c Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 1788 single-copy gene families using 100 bootstrap replications. d Pan-genome tree based on presence/absence of gene family. The strain names are colored according to their isolation sites

Phylogeny of Shewanella

To gain insights into similarity and distance of the strains, two phylogenetic trees were constructed, one was based on the concatenated alignment of 1788 single-copy core genes (Fig. 1c), and another was based on absence or presence of each gene families (Fig. 1d). In the two trees, strains were grouped into two clades. The first clade was made up of most sediment strains, and the second one consisted mostly of water strains. S. loihica PV-4, isolated from iron-rich microbial mats [27], was phylogenetically distant from the rest strains, suggesting it had a low degree of similarity within core genes to the other strains. The separation tendency of different subgroups bore a high resemblance in the two trees in spite of the strains having different relative positions. S. frigidimarina NCIMB 400 showed much evolutionary relatedness to the S. denitrificans OS217 on the single-copy core gene tree, but they were no longer the sisters on the pan-genome tree, which indicated that non-core genes were likely to make them diverged. In addition, the S. loihica PV-4 was the sister with the S. amazonensis SB2B on the pan-genome tree, but had substantial distance on the single-copy core gene tree, suggesting that the variable genes made up a dominant proportion of the phylogenetic signal and played a role in the evolution of these two strains. It was also noted that those divergent strains, including S. frigidimarina NCIMB 400, S. denitrificans OS217, S. amazonensis SB2B, S. violacea DSS12, S. woodyi ATCC 51908, S. sediminis HAW-EB3, S. halifaxensis HAW-EB4, S. pealeana ATCC 700345, S. piezotolerans WP3 and S. loihica PV-4, contained more specific genes. Hence, it was likely that the larger differences of genes lead to evolutionary divergence, which suggested that different gene gain and loss might play important roles in the evolution of some Shewanella strains and make them apart from their relatives.

CAZyme identification and profiling

Carbohydrate metabolism was one of the most important metabolic activities [28]. Members of Shewanella can anaerobically transfer electrons from cell metabolism to versatile electron acceptors [6]. The process of obtaining electrons from carbohydrates by Shewanella was the hydrolysis of complex carbohydrates present in biomass [29]. This was achieved through the presence of a repertoire of secreted or complexed carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes). To further understand the mechanism of polysaccharide hydrolysis in Shewanella, we identified the CAZymes in pan-genome. These strains contained an abundance of glycosyltransferases (GT), glycoside hydrolases (GH), carbohydrate esterases (CE), carbohydrate binding molecules (CBM), and a small number of auxiliary activities (AA) and polysaccharide lyases (PL) (Fig. 2a). In addition, these CAZymes were more abundant in accessory and specific genome than in core genome. This diversification of the Shewanella CAZyme-encoding genes allowed for different electron-transporting roles in cellular metabolism. In addition, strains varied in their number of unique CAZyme-encoding genes, suggesting the metabolic abilities of carbohydrates were specialized among Shewanella strains. There were 18 strains possessing specific genes for CAZymes, and GTs and GHs were most abundant (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

CAZyme distribution. a Distribution of CAZymes in pan-genome. The counts of orthologous genes assigned by CAZymes in the core genome (blue bars), the accessory genome (green bars) and the specific genome (red bars) are shown. b Distribution of specific genes assigned by CAZymes in each Shewanella strain. Strains are colored according to their isolation sites (blue: water, red: sediment and yellow: other). GT glycosyltransferases, GH glycoside hydrolases, CE carbohydrate esterases, CBM carbohydrate-binding molecules, AA auxiliary activities, PL polysaccharide lyases

Additionally, we found that strains isolated from the water seemed to contain less specific CAZyme-encoding genes than other strains from more diverse environments. The diversity of such specific CAZyme-encoding genes was important to the strategies of carbohydrate metabolism that would result in metabolism specialization and environment adaptation. The S. woodyi ATCC 51908 had the most strain-specific CAZymes (28), followed by S. violacea DSS12 (17) and S. sediminis HAW-EB3 (13). The three strains had more strain-specific CAZyme-encoding genes and they were isolated from detritus or sediment. Such high number of strain-specific CAZyme-encoding genes might contribute to their metabolic diversity in more diverse environments. Furthermore, GTs were the most common in the unique genes, such patterns suggested that GTs might be important in the environmental adaptation of these strains. However, GEs, CBMs and GHs were the most abundant among the S. woodyi ATCC 51908 unique genes, suggesting that GEs, CBMs and GHs might be important in the detritus adaptation of S. woodyi ATCC 51908.

Functional profiling of pan-genome

To gain insights into functional diversity in these strains, the pan-genome from the 24 genomes was also compared using functional gene ontology categories. All of the GO terms fell into three categories: biological processes (BP), molecular function (MF) and cellular component (CC) (Fig. 3a). Genes with biosynthetic process, transport and signal transduction were more abundant in the BP category. Genes related to ion binding, DNA binding and oxidoreductase activity were enriched in MF category. For the CC category, genes involved in cytoplasm, intracellular and protein complex were dominant. Pan-genome processed a great number of genes involved in various metabolic pathways and enzymes. The presence of so many carbon and energy utilization pathways, material transport and synthesis systems was a reflection of the high-pressure and deep-sea extreme environment. In addition, the existence of so many genes involved in transport, transmembrane transport and ion binding provided supports for iron reduction. The vast majority of genes in the core genome were involved in housekeeping functions, such as biosynthetic process, metabolic functions, cytoplasm, intracellular and ribosome (Fig. 3a). These categories were also present, but hardly appeared in the accessory and specific genome, whereas the accessory and specific genes were enriched in transport, signal transduction, binding and enzymatic activity (Fig. 3a). The non-core genes could be important for adaptation to specific habitats. Such functional enrichment patterns of accessory and specific genes reflected their notable respiratory diversity.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

GO annotation of gene families. a GO annotation of pan-genome in biological processes, molecular function and cellular component. Core clusters (blue), accessory clusters (green) and specific genes (red). b Distribution of selection pressures by categories of biological processes, molecular function and cellular component. Values of dN/dS assigned by GO categories in the single-copy core genome are showed

In addition, cluster of orthologous group (COG) functions of the pan-genome were compared. Genes with predicted functions and unknown functions were more abundant in the pan-genome (Additional file 2: Figure S1). The majority of genes in the core genome were involved in ‘Energy production and conversion’ (C), ‘Amino acid transport and metabolism’ (E) and ‘Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis’ (J) (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Whereas the accessory and specific genome had a slight increase in genes involved in ‘Amino acid transport and metabolism’ (E), ‘Transcription’ (K) and ‘Signal transduction mechanisms’ (T) (Additional file 2: Figure S1).

To reveal the uniqueness of the strains, we detected several specific genes that might be related to the survival environment. Among the strain-specific genes in pan-genome, S. loihica PV-4 had a gene encoding menaquinone biosynthesis protein MenD that facilitated electron transfer. Previous study suggested that menaquinone was the electron transporter in the respiratory chain and was essential for the survival of S. loihica PV-4 [27]. This menD gene did not exist in other strains, which might be important for the survival of S. loihica PV-4 in the iron-rich environment. In addition, S. woodyi ATCC 51908, S. pealeana ATCC 700345, S. sediminis HAW-EB3 and S. halifaxensis HAW-EB4 possessed one or two strain-specific genes encoding nitrite reductase that were involved in nitrogen oxide reduction. The S. amazonensis SB2B, also had a specific gene encoding glutamine synthetase that was a key enzyme of nitrogen metabolism. It was reported that Shewanella was capable of nitrate reduction using nitrate as the electron acceptor under certain conditions [30]. These five strains had such strain-specific genes related to nitrogen utilization, which indicated that they had characteristics that were more complex in response to nitrogen. In addition, S. amazonensis SB2B and S. sediminis HAW-EB3 possessed genes encoding inorganic diphosphatase. The specificity of this enzyme has been reported to vary with the source and the activating metal ion [31]. S. violacea DSS12 had a specific gene-encoding related cytochrome oxidase that was responsible for oxidative phosphorylation. This gene was adjacent to other electron transfer genes in S. violacea DSS12 genome, suggesting that it might interact with those adjacent genes and function in the related pathways.

Selective pressure analysis

To investigate conservation and evolution of housekeeping genes, functional diversification and evolutionary pressure of single-copy core genes were detected. In addition, the non-synonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) substitution rates (dN/dS) were estimated for each single-copy core family. The analysis showed that all of the single-copy core genes encountered a strong purifying selection (Fig. 3b). Such an important pattern of strong purifying selection indicated that the single-copy core genes were highly conservative and purifying selection contributing to their long-term stability.

The combination of selective pressure and the functional categories could reveal the functions involved in rapid evolution. We estimated the strength of purifying selection for single-copy genes in different functions. Genes tended to exhibit different degrees of conservative evolutionary directions, and some of them experienced weaker purifying selection especially those involved in translation, protein folding and structural constituent of ribosome (Fig. 3b). However, genes involved in biological processes of cellular component assembly evolved under strongest purifying selection. For different categories of molecular function, genes undergoing the strongest purifying selection were those involved in DNA binding transcription factor activity, while genes involved in structural constituent of ribosome underwent more relaxed purifying pressure. Furthermore, genes involved in ribosome exhibited higher evolutionary rates, while genes involved in plasma membrane exhibited lower evolutionary rates. These results suggested that genes undergoing higher purifying selection, played dominant roles in the evolutionary rates among the Shewanella strains, making them retain the original functional process of cellular component assembly, plasma membrane, etc. This observation of purifying selection in single-copy core genes suggested that purifying selection might drive evolution in the essential life functions across all 24 Shewanella strains.

Gene gain and loss

Gene gain and loss during evolution can increase the fitness of bacteria within habitats [32, 33]. To obtain deeper insight into the evolution of gene families over a phylogeny, we performed an analysis of gene expansion and contraction at each branch of speciation. Diversification at branches was associated with a large number of changes in gene family size across the Shewanella tree. The 3594 gene families were more likely to have been inherited from the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Shewanella, and 1805 of which (50.22%) families experienced size changes (Fig. 4a). In the tree, each strain branch of the phylogeny has changed in evolution (Fig. 4a). In addition, S. loihica PV-4, the most distantly related strain based on single-copy phylogeny, had only six changed genes. Furthermore, contractions outnumbered expansions on all branches except the branch of S. loihica PV-4, S. putrefaciens CN-32, and S. baltica OS195. An average of 15 gene families was under expansion, whereas 123 gene families contracted in each strain branch, indicating that loss function played an important role in dynamic evolution. The gene families expanded in those branches of strains were mainly enriched in categories of oxidation–reduction process, catalytic activity and membrane. (Additional file 3: Figure S2A). Gene enrichment analysis showed that these strains have lost the majority of genes involved in oxidation–reduction process, DNA binding and membrane (Additional file 3: Figure S2B). The enrichment of changed genes in reduction process and membrane seemed to be ecologically important and contribute to the successful adaptation of the strains.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Dynamic evolution of orthologous gene family. a Gene family expansion and contraction in each evolutionary branch. Phylogenetic tree is constructed by 1788 single-copy gene families. The number of expanded (green) or contracted (red) gene families in each strain is on the corresponding branch. MRCA: most recent common ancestor. b Distribution of recent horizontal genes in each strain. c The presence of HGT genes in donor bacteria

Due to recent acquisition and deletion, the gene that is not in the MRCA is more variable than the core gene [34]. HGT is the main driver of bacterial evolution and adaptation [35]. To infer the recent evolutionary dynamics of Shewanella on a larger scope of strains, we examined all horizontally acquired genes and obtained 1800 genes that were of horizontal origin and the number of HGT-origin genes detected each strain was different (Fig. 4b). Gene transfer occurred in many genes, which indicated that horizontal transfer genes played an important role in the gene flow and acquisition and contributed to the open pan-genome of the Shewanella. Among these strains, S. baltica OS185 appeared to gain the largest number of genes, whereas S. loihica PV-4 did not detect the horizontal gene. S. loihica PV-4 showed closest evolutionary relatedness in core gene similarity to the nearest common ancestor, and the numbers of gene expansion, contraction and HGT genes were minimum, probably because the strain’s living environment is similar to the ancestor. To infer the contribution of donors to horizontal gene transfer, we identified donors for these horizontal transfer genes (Fig. 4c, Additional file 4: Table S2). These transferred genes appeared to originate from members of Vibrionales and Enterobacteriales family, particularly the genera Vibrio, which suggested that HGT events were more effective to occur in closely related organisms rather than in distantly related organisms. In addition, these HGT-origin genes were enriched in DNA metabolic process, transposition and DNA binding (Additional file 3: Figure S2C). The acquisition of genes in DNA metabolic process, transposition and DNA binding could aid in their survival in different environments. For example, the S. woodyi ATCC 51908, S. sediminis HAW-EB3, S. sp. MR-4 and S. sp. MR-7 acquired two or three genes encoding the nitrate reductase. The S. woodyi ATCC 51908, S. sediminis HAW-EB3, S. baltica OS185, S. baltica OS223 and S. piezotolerans WP3 strains acquired a gene encoding glutamine synthetase. These genes were involved in the nitrogen cycle, which was apparently important for the successful adaptation. These results suggested that HGT was an important driver of the evolution of these genomes. Therefore, the available gene pool for HGT could explain the difference in non-MRCA genomes and the increased pan-genome size of these strains. These findings suggested that gain and loss of genes that were apparently accessory for the majority of the strains of a genus might be a successful strategy for biological diversification, rapid evolution and environmental adaptation.

Evolution of the mtr clusters in Shewanella

Previous studies on S. oneidensis MR-1 indicated that genes within a cluster (mtrBAC–omcA–mtrFED) were involved in the metal-reducing pathway, while the S. denitrificans OS217 did not possess this cluster [17, 36]. In particular, this cluster comprised seven genes that were clustered in sequential order of mtrD–mtrE–mtrF–omcA–mtrC–mtrA–mtrB [37]. The feoA–feoB operon involved in ferrous iron transport was common to all strains and adjacent to the mtr–omc cluster. To explore new features of metal reduction pathways, we compared this kind of mtr–omc gene cluster in these 24 strains. Although genes within this cluster shared a high degree of similarity with the homologues described in S. oneidensis MR-1, the number and composition carried out by different Shewanella strains were still changed (Fig. 5a). The complete mtrBAC–omcA–mtrFED cluster was conserved in 15 out of the 24 strains. In addition, the mtrABC operon was conserved in all the genomes except for S. denitrificans OS217 and S. violacea DSS12. The mtrDEF operon, homologues of mtrABC, was virtually absent from S. sp. W3-18-1, S. putrefaciens CN-32, S. putrefaciens 200, S. frigidimarina NCIMB 400, S. denitrificans OS217, S. violacea DSS12 and S. woodyi ATCC 51908. The mtr–omc clusters of 17 strains were considerably different from that of S. oneidensis MR-1 since there were gene duplication, gene loss, or new gene gains within it. Such change of this cluster reflected the evolutionary history and possibly metal respiratory specialization, which agreed well with the previous study that the absence of genes in this mtr–omc cluster would result in slower iron reduction [38]. For example, S. denitrificans OS217 and S. violacea DSS12, which both lacked the entire cluster, showed limited anaerobic growth capacity that may be due to gene loss in the process of ecological specialization [4]. In addition, expansion of omcA gene occurred in S. amazonensis SB2B, S. sediminis HAW-EB3, S. pealeana ATCC 700345 and S. loihica PV-4, which reflected gene acquisition and dynamic evolution in metal respiration. The tree of genes within the cluster and the cymA gene showed that each gene formed a group with its orthologs from different strains (Additional file 5: Figure S3). Branches of each gene clustered into two distinct groups, which imply two distinct evolutionary paths for different strains. In addition, the evolutionary relationship of omcA between these strains was determined according to their genetic characteristics. These S. baltica strains showed much evolutionary relatedness in each gene, and the omcA genes from multi-locus in S. loihica PV-4, S. sediminis HAW-EB3 and S. pealeana ATCC 700345 formed the relatively independent branch, showing the duplication events (Additional file 6: Figure S4).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Global comparison of the mtr–omc clusters in Shewanella and orthologous gene clusters in other strains. a Genetic comparative organization of the gene locus associated with the metal-reducing pathway of 24 Shewanella strains. Arrows indicate genes and their orientations. The length of the colored box indicates gene homology with those in MR-1. The double slash indicates the existence of extra genes. b The genetic occurrence of the mtr homologous clusters in diverse bacteria. The tree on the left is a taxonomic common tree, and the bars on the right represent the classifications of bacteria. S. oneidensis MR-1 is colored in red

The presence of mtr–omc cluster in Shewanella was supposed to correlate with its deep-sea habitat, this cluster presumably shared with other deep-sea microorganisms [39]. To examine extensive genetic exchange between dissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria, the genetic occurrence of the mtr homologues was predicted (Fig. 5b). The apparent widespread distribution of metal-reducing pathways in other bacteria indicated the importance of electron-transfer pathway in microbial oxidation–reduction of iron [37]. The cluster facilitating the iron respiration was conserved among closely related species such as Ferrimonas balearica and Vibrio vulnificus, and showed the same sequential order of mtrC–mtrA–mtrB, indicating that the order of the homologues genes was highly conserved. This was in accordance with the previous study that homologues of the metal-reducing pathway were found in a series of other dissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria and might have co-evolved in these bacteria [40]. The protein products of these mtr genes worked together to facilitate electron transfer across the cell envelop [37], which had been recognized as an early form of respiration, although it was widespread among the bacteria [41], there were still fewer strains containing complete orthologous genes of metal reduction system. The genes mtrA and mtrD were present in most strains, but few mtrBCEF and omcA genes were present. The lack of apparent mtr genes in the most metal-reducing strains was consistent with previous studies that the electron-transfer pathways used by metal-reducing strains for extracellular reduction of Fe(III)-containing minerals had evolved independently [17].

The metal-reducing pathway was generally considered as one of the most ancient microbial metabolisms on earth a long time ago [39]. Previous study had described that Shewanella contained regions, which were likely to be horizontally acquired from members of the Enterobacteriaceae family bacteria [4]. To infer the evolutionary relationships of mtr–omc cluster on a larger scope of strains, individual phylogenetic trees of mtr genes from different organisms were constructed (Additional file 7: Figure S5). Phylogenetic trees of mtrE, mtrF, mtrA and mtrD showed that Shewanella strains exhibited very similar evolutionary relatedness among each other and were relatively independent from other bacteria. However, several Shewanella strains were scattered to different branches in phylogenetic trees of mtrB, mtrC, omcA (Additional file 7: Figure S5). These mtr genes of Shewanella strains showed evolutionary relatedness to Ferrimonas species, probably because of the extensive horizontal gene transfer events (Fig. 6a). In addition, the differences of the metal-reducing pathway of Shewanella strains might be due to the result of multiple gene gains and loss events during the evolution. As these isolates originated from diverse geographic locations and habitats, such as marine water, sediments and subsurface, they carried out a diverse range of metabolic processes (Fig. 6b). And the mtr genes had changed during the evolution since they were under strong purifying selection (Fig. 6c). The strong purifying selection played a key role in selecting for such iron respiration changes in their evolution. The mtrC had lower similarity with the homologues compared with other genes, underwent more diversifying selection. Besides, due to the constraint of purifying selection, some of the mtr experienced gene loss and gene duplication, as well as new gene gains (Fig. 6d). In the metal-reducing pathway, electrons from the inner membrane passed through the periplasm and across the outer membrane to the extracellular minerals via the protein components encoding by mtr–omc cluster [42] (Fig. 6e). With the gain and loss of genes, genes of mtr–omc cluster were no longer core genes, and the ability for Shewanella to adapt to environmental conditions by metal-reducing pathway was presumably no longer essential for survival. Another possible explanation could be that other pathways had been developed to utilize different types of electron acceptors during their evolution to facultative anaerobic environments [43] (Fig. 6f). In particular, mtr genes experienced additional contraction events with some of them lost during evolution, which indicated that respiration had become less competitive as the environment changed.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

A hypothetical model for the evolution of the Mtr pathway in Shewanella. a Shewanella may acquire the mtr genes from the ancestor by HGT and exchange with other bacteria. b The geographic origin of 24 Shewanella genomes used in this study. c Selection pressure of mtr genes, with each box showing the ratio of nonsynonymous (dN) over synonymous substitution (dS) rate. Red boxes represent genes that with high ratios, blue boxes represent genes that with low ratios. d Dynamic changed of mtr clusters. Gene gains and losses derived from HGT events and genes duplication. e The metal-reducing pathway of S. oneidensis MR-1 (OM outer membrane, IM inner membrane, MQH2 reduced form of menaquinone, MQ oxidized form of menaquinone). f The depiction of multiple electron transfer pathways of respiration reported in Shewanella

Conclusions

In this study, a comparative pan-genome analysis has been conducted to study the genomic diversity and evolutionary relationships among these 24 Shewanella strains. The pan-genome exhibited a high level of genome variability, about 86% of which was variable. And this pan-genome was found to be open and had a high percentage of strain-specific genes within it. Moreover, the existence of several strain-specific genes and abundant CAZymes in the accessory and specific genomes reflected the functional diversity and metabolic diversity of the pan-genome. And also the essential function of single-copy core genes would evolve under purifying selection, which illustrated the importance of the housekeeping function to each strain for survival. We also found that HGT played a key role in the shaping of the Shewanella accessory and specific genome and accelerated the evolution of strains. Furthermore, purifying selection played an important role in the stability of the core-genome and facilitated the evolution of mtr–omc clusters in different Shewanella strains to different habitats. We re-emphasized that the number of Shewanella strains was expanded to 24, which had not been reported by others in the previous studies.

The work presented here would help carry out further research on the genetic basis of Shewanella, and better enhance understanding of metal-reducing pathway and the impact of HGT on the evolution. It could also contribute to research on applications of metal-reducing bacteria in bioremediation and metabolic engineering.

Methods

Datasets

The genomic features, geographical origin and isolation site characteristics of the genomic sequences used in this study are provided in Additional file 8: Table S3. Genomes and protein sequences were downloaded from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), representing 24 different strains.

Gene family

To understand the evolutionary relationship of Shewanella, we conducted systematic comparative genomic studies. Full protein-coding genes of 24 Shewanella strains were used to construct gene families using OrthoMCL (v2) [44] with a BLAST E-value cut-off of 1e−5 and an inflation parameter of 1.5. Here, the clustering results yielded 7830 homologous clusters, 1788 of which were single-copy gene families, and then they were parsed and concatenated.

Phylogeny construction

Protein sequences for these single-copy gene families were concatenated and aligned by MUSCLE(v3.8) [45] with default parameters. The alignments were curated by GBlock (v0.91b) [46] to filter out poorly aligned positions. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood algorithm with 100 bootstraps as implemented in Phylip (v3.696).

The pan-genome tree based on the absence or presence of each gene family in all genomes used the Manhattan distance to measure the evolutionary relationship of strains. Each gene in the genome was scored on basis of the presence (1 value) or absence (0 value), a 0/1 matrix was built and Manhattan distance was calculated, then a phylogenetic tree of the pan-genome was generated using MEGA (v5).

To determine the evolutionary origin of mtr–omc clusters, the co-occurrence of mtr–omc clusters in bacteria was obtained from the STRING [47] database. In addition, homologous mtr genes identification from other genus were based on the best match of the alignment to the NCBI non-random protein database using the BLASTp program with an E-value cut-off of 1e−5. Then the Phylip program was used to infer the phylogenetic relationships among these mtr genes.

Gene distribution expansion

To gain a great insight into the evolutionary dynamics of the genes, the expansion and contraction of the gene families among these 24 Shewanella strains were determined. CAFE (v2.1) [48] was used to infer the change in gene family size in each branch. Gene gain and loss were along with each branch of the single-copy gene family tree, and significant levels of expansion and contraction were determined at 0.05.

Detection of horizontal gene transfer

To infer mobile elements of Shewanella genome, all non-recent common ancestral genes were aligned to plasmid sequences, insertion sequences, phage sequences available in the NCBI RefSeq database, ISfinder and ACLAME database, respectively. A gene was used as input for HGTector (v0.2.1) [49] searches in terms of its best BLASTp hit with a sequence identity of above 50% and a cutoff E value of 10−5. The identification of HGT-origin genes used HGTector with BLAST parameter thresholds 90% identity, an E-value of 10−5 and 500 top-scoring matches. The Shewanella and Shewanellaceae were set as self-group and close group, respectively.

Functional annotations

Hmmscan was used to determine carbohydrate activity enzymes (CAZymes) by comparing all gene families to dbCAN [50] database. Gene ontology (GO) terms were identified using InterProScan (v.5) [51]. GO term assignments for each of the genes were retrieved from InterproScan results. Since GO slims were particularly useful for giving a summary of the genome-wide GO annotation, all of the GO terms were mapped to GO slim (http://www.geneontology.org/GO.slims.shtml). Additionally, gene annotation was based on COG databases, using BLAST with a cutoff E-value of 1e−5.

Selective pressure analysis

To estimate the rate of evolution and test the selection pressure on each single-copy orthologous genes, the program PAML (v. 4.4c) [52] was used. For each pair of strains, the Codeml model was used to calculate dN and dS values. The single ω (dN/dS, the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous divergence) across sites was estimated using M0, M7, M8 models that were fixed across the phylogeny for each alignment (referred to as ω of a gene). To avoid convergence problems, each analysis was repeated three times with different initial values of ω and adopted results from the analysis with the highest likelihood.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

The whole study was designed by KN. CFZ collected datasets. CFZ and SJY analyzed the data. CFZ, MZH explained the results. CFZ, SJY, MZH, PSY, HJL and KN wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Zhiwei Song who provided assistance during preparation of this report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript and its additional files.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was partially supported by National Science Foundation of China Grant 31671374, Ministry of Science and Technology’s high-tech (863) Grant 2014AA021502.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Molecular-imaging, Department of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China

References

  1. Janda JM, Abbott SL. The genus Shewanella: from the briny depths below to human pathogen. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2014;40(4):293–312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nealson KH, Scott J. Ecophysiology of the genus Shewanella. In: Dworkin M, editor. The prokaryotes: proteobacteria: Gamma subclass, vol. 6. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 1133–51.Google Scholar
  3. Lovley D. Dissimilatory Fe(III)-and Mn(IV)-reducing prokaryotes. In the prokaryotes. Berlin: Springer; 2006. p. 635–58.Google Scholar
  4. Konstantinidis KT, et al. Comparative systems biology across an evolutionary gradient within the Shewanella genus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(37):15909–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lovley DR. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55(2):259–87.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Tiedje JM. Shewanella—the environmentally versatile genome. London: Nature Publishing Group; 2002.Google Scholar
  7. Kim HJ, et al. A microbial fuel cell type lactate biosensor using a metal-reducing bacterium, Shewanella putrefaciens. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;9(3):365–7.Google Scholar
  8. Gorby YA, et al. Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(30):11358–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bendall ML, et al. Exploring the roles of DNA methylation in the metal-reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Bacteriol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00935-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehaut A, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of H2S-positive and H2S-negative strains of Shewanella baltica isolated from spoiled whiting (Merlangius merlangus). Lett Appl Microbiol. 2014;59(5):542–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shanafield HA. Evolution of the set of signal transduction proteins in 10 species of Shewanella. 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Camila Odio JS. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1: background and applications. 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Coursolle D, Gralnick JA. Modularity of the Mtr respiratory pathway of Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1. Mol Microbiol. 2010;77(4):995–1008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shi L, et al. Isolation of a high-affinity functional protein complex between OmcA and MtrC: two outer membrane decaheme c-type cytochromes of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(13):4705–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Yang Y, et al. Roles of UndA and MtrC of Shewanella putrefaciens W3-18-1 in iron reduction. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:267.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang F, et al. Isolation of extremophiles with the detection and retrieval of Shewanella strains in deep-sea sediments from the west Pacific. Extremophiles. 2004;8(2):165–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fredrickson JK, et al. Towards environmental systems biology of Shewanella. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(8):592.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vernikos G, et al. Ten years of pan-genome analyses. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;23:148–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bentley S. Sequencing the species pan-genome. London: Nature Publishing Group; 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Dikow RB. Genome-level homology and phylogeny of Shewanella (Gammaproteobacteria: lteromonadales: Shewanellaceae). BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):237.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Caro-Quintero A, et al. Unprecedented levels of horizontal gene transfer among spatially co-occurring Shewanella bacteria from the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011;5(1):131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ong WK, et al. Comparisons of Shewanella strains based on genome annotations, modeling, and experiments. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8(1):31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Caroquintero A, et al. Unprecedented levels of horizontal gene transfer among spatially co-occurring Shewanella bacteria from the Baltic Sea. Isme J Emultidiscip J Microbial Ecol. 2011;5(1):131–40.Google Scholar
  24. Konstantinidis KT, et al. Comparative systems biology across an evolutionary gradient within the Shewanella genus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(37):15909–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi L, et al. Molecular underpinnings of Fe(III) oxide reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang F, et al. Environmental adaptation: genomic analysis of the piezotolerant and psychrotolerant deep-sea iron reducing bacterium Shewanella piezotolerans WP3. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(4):e1937.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gao H, et al. Shewanella loihica sp. nov., isolated from iron-rich microbial mats in the Pacific Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56(8):1911–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Maughan R. Carbohydrate metabolism. Surgery (Oxford). 2009;27(1):6–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Serres MH, Riley M. Genomic analysis of carbon source metabolism of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1: predictions versus experiments. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(13):4601–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Chen Y, Wang F. Insights on nitrate respiration by Shewanella. Front Mar Sci. 2015;1:80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Owen A, Larry GB. Yeast inorganic pyrophosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1972;247:7315–9.Google Scholar
  32. Ochman H, Moran NA. Genes lost and genes found: evolution of bacterial pathogenesis and symbiosis. Science. 2001;292(5519):1096–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Oh PL, et al. Diversification of the gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri as a result of host-driven evolution. ISME J. 2010;4(3):377.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Li Y-H, et al. De novo assembly of soybean wild relatives for pan-genome analysis of diversity and agronomic traits. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(10):1045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gyles C, Boerlin P. Horizontally transferred genetic elements and their role in pathogenesis of bacterial disease. Vet Pathol. 2014;51(2):328–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gao H, et al. Probing regulon of ArcA in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 by integrated genomic analyses. BMC Genomics. 2008;9(1):42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Shi L, et al. Mtr extracellular electron-transfer pathways in Fe(III)-reducing or Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria: a genomic perspective. London: Portland Press Limited; 2012.Google Scholar
  38. Yang Y, et al. Roles of UndA and MtrC of Shewanella putrefaciens W3-18-1 in iron reduction. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13(1):267.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Vargas M, et al. Microbiological evidence for Fe(III) reduction on early Earth. Nature. 1998;395(6697):65–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Cairns-Smith AG, Hall AJ, Russell MJ. Mineral theories of the origin of life and an iron sulfide example. Berlin: Springer; 1992. p. 161–80.Google Scholar
  41. Lonergan DJ, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(8):2402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Clarke TA, Richardson DJ. Structure of a bacterial cell surface decaheme electron conduit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(23):9384–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Chen Y, Wang F. Insights on nitrate respiration by Shewanella. Front Mar Sci. 2014;1:80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003;13(9):2178–89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):564–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Snel B, et al. STRING: a web-server to retrieve and display the repeatedly occurring neighbourhood of a gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(18):3442–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. De Bie T, et al. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(10):1269–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhu Q, Kosoy M, Dittmar K. HGTector: an automated method facilitating genome-wide discovery of putative horizontal gene transfers. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:717.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Yin Y, et al. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(W1):W445–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Finn RD, et al. InterPro in 2017—beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;45(D1):D190–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(8):1586–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement

Biotechnology for Biofuels

ISSN: 1754-6834

Contact us