Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Rapid characterization of the activities of lignin-modifying enzymes based on nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS)

Biotechnology for Biofuels201811:266

  • Received: 11 April 2018
  • Accepted: 19 September 2018
  • Published:



Producing valuable fuels and chemicals from lignin is a key factor for making lignocellulosic biomass economically feasible; however, significant roadblocks exist due to our lack of detailed understanding of how lignin is enzymatically depolymerized and of the range of possible lignin fragments that can be produced. Development of suitable enzymatic assays for characterization of putative lignin active enzymes is an important step towards improving our understanding of the catalytic activities of relevant enzymes. Previously, we have successfully built an assay platform based on glycan substrates containing a charged perfluorinated tag and nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry to study carbohydrate active enzymes, especially various glycosyl hydrolyses. Here, we extend this approach to develop a reliable and rapid assay to study lignin-modifying enzymes.


Two β-aryl ether bond containing model lignin dimer substrates, designed to be suitable for studying the activities of lignin-modifying enzymes (LMEs) by nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS), were successful synthesized. Small-angle neutron scattering experiments showed that these substrates form micelles in solution. Two LMEs, laccase from the polypore mushroom Trametes versicolor, and manganese peroxidase (MnP) from white rot fungus Nematoloma frowardii, were tested for catalytic activity against the two model substrates. We show that the reaction of laccase and MnP with phenolic substrate yields products that arise from the cleavage of the carbon–carbon single bond between the α-carbon and the adjacent aryl carbon, consistent with the mechanism for producing phenoxy radical as reaction intermediates. Reactions of the nonphenolic substrate with laccase, on the other hand, adopt a different pathway by producing an α-oxidation product; as well as the cleavage of the β-aryl ether bond. No cleavage of the carbon–carbon bond between the α-carbon and the aryl carbon was observed. To facilitate understanding of reaction kinetics, the reaction time course for laccase activity on the phenolic substrate (I) was generated by the simultaneous measurement of all products at different time points of the reaction. Withdrawal of only a small sample aliquot (0.2 μL at each time point) ensured minimum perturbation of the reaction. The time course can help us to understand the enzyme kinetics.


A new assay procedure has been developed for studying lignin-modifying enzymes by nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry. Enzyme assays of a laccase and a MnP on phenolic and nonphenolic β-aryl ether substrates revealed different primary reaction pathways due to the availability of the phenoxy radical intermediates. Our assay provides a wealth of information on bond cleavage events not available using conventional colorimetric assays and can easily be carried out in microliter volumes and the quantitative analysis of product formation and kinetics is rapidly achieved by NIMS. This is the first time that NIMS technology was applied to study the activities of lignin-modifying enzymes. Unlike other previous works, our use of amphiphilic guaiacylglycerol β-O-4 substrate (I) enables the formation of micelles. This approach helps avoid the re-polymerization of the resulting monomeric product. As a result, our assay can clearly demonstrate the degradation pathways of phenolic guaiacylglycerol β-O-4 type of molecules with laccase and MnP.


  • Lignin
  • β-Aryl ether
  • Lignin-modifying enzymes
  • NIMS
  • Enzyme assays


Lignin is a major component of lignocellulosic biomass [1] and has the potential to be a valuable starting material for producing biofuels or high value bioproducts [2]. Moreover, conversion of lignin to fuels and chemicals [35] is regarded as a key factor for making lignocellulosic biomass economically feasible. The viability of lignin degradation depends on the availability of optimal lignin-modifying enzymes [69] that can efficiently degrade lignin biopolymers into simpler aromatics.

Enzymes responsible for lignin breakdown target the common lignin linkages [10, 11]: β-O-4 (arylglycerol-β-aryl ether), 5–5′ (biphenyl), β-5 (phenylcoumaran), 4-O-5 (diaryl ether), etc. Among these linkages, β-O-4 linkages represent approximately 50% and 60% of the total bonds of softwood and hardwood, respectively; making them important targets for enzyme assays. Hence, several surrogate substrates containing chromophores have been developed for studying cleavage of β-O-4 linkages. For example, guaiacylglycol and glycerol- β-O-(β-methylumbelliferyl) ethers have been synthesized for the fluorometric assays for β-etherases [12, 13]. As an alternative to spectroscopic assays, mass spectrometry-based enzyme activity assays enable detection of multiple products from a single substrate. One such approach uses nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS) [1416] and glycan substrates [17] containing a charged perfluorinated tag, which partitions onto the NIMS surface, greatly enhancing detection of substrates and products.

Here, we describe the use of two synthetic β-aryl ether substrates for studying lignin-modifying enzymes using NIMS, a recently developed surface-based desorption ionization technique [14]. The NIMS chip is especially fabricated by etching the surface of a porous silicon wafer and treating it with an initiator molecule (e.g. a fluorous disiloxane). Samples are spotted onto the NIMS surface and then laser desorption/ionization of the analytes from the surface is used for the MS analysis. One interesting application of NIMS is called nimzyme [15] in which a fluorous tagged substrate (e.g., tagged glycans) is immobilized onto an NIMS surface. After incubating the surface with an E. coli lysate or a microbial community lysate, the NIMS surface was then washed. The products from the enzyme reaction can be detected by direct MS readout. More recently, nimzyme has been expanded to the use of soluble model substrates [16] to provide the specificity and sensitivity required to study glycosylhydrolases. One big advantage of the nimzyme method is multiplexing, which is achieved by simultaneous measurement of enzyme activities on multiple substrates. For multiplexing, different fluorous tags are typically needed for each substrate. The fluorous tag for each substrate is chosen to enable the differentiation of similar or identical products [17] from different enzymatic reactions by their unique mass tag (i.e., enabling different m/z in mass spectrometry). Nimzyme has been recently integrated with acoustic printing to create an enzyme characterization platform capable of one second/sample throughput, while only requiring only 20 μL sample volumes [18]. Currently, this platform has been used for measuring enzyme activities of glycosylhydrolases against a panel of well-characterized substrates [19].

Since approximately one-third of plant biomass is lignin, it is desirable to complement these existing assays for cellulose and hemicellulose active enzymes with assays designed to characterize lignin active enzymes. In addition, since NIMS is matrix free, data interpretation is readily facilitated, in comparison to MALDI-based assays that often use monolignols for desorption/ionization resulting in extensive lignin-related background ions.

Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) reveals that these amphiphilic molecules form micelles like previous NIMS glycan substrates [16]. Micelles formation is important, and we hypothesize that the structure of micelles may reflect more natural reaction conditions in comparison to completely soluble substrates. Finally, the application of our LMEs assay demonstrates that phenolic and nonphenolic β-aryl ether substrates adopt different reaction pathways.

Results and discussion

Since the substrate molecule (Fig. 1) consists of a hydrophobic fluorinated segment and a hydrophilic arylglycerol, it is expected that the molecules will self-assemble in aqueous solutions as we have previously observed [16]. To examine this, small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) was performed with compound (I) in aqueous solution at 5 mM. The SANS data suggest the formation of micelles. As shown in Fig. 2, the SANS curve is fitted to a spherical model with a mean radius of 2.6 nm (polydispersity 11%). This dimension is consistent with the estimated size of these molecules, ~ 2.6 nm. A core–shell structure is not revealed by SANS data because the neutron scattering contrast between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic segments are similiar to each other [20]. These aggregates/micelles may reflect more natural reaction conditions in comparison to completely soluble substrate molecules often used in activity screening as many lignin-degrading enzymes act on insoluble solid lignin substrates.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Structures of phenolic substrate I and nonphenolic substrate XII

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

SANS data of 5 mg/mL phenolic β-aryl ether substrate (I) in D2O

Figure 3 illustrates the results from the reactions of phenolic β-aryl ether dimeric substrates with two different lignin active enzymes, a laccase from the polypore mushroom Trametes Versicolor, and a manganese peroxidase (MnP) from the white rot fungus Nematoloma frowardii. Both reactions were performed at room temperature for 18 h. These results revealed that both enzymes generate similar product profiles, with slight differences in individual product concentration, suggesting that both enzymatic reactions may proceed via a similar mechanism.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Representative mass spectral signatures from reactions of laccases and MnP with phenolic β-aryl ether substrate (I)

It is interesting to see the formation of a small amount of product (m/z 2299) from the dimerization of phenolic β-O-4 substrate (m/z 1151), and no higher order of polymerization than dimerization was observed. Presumably, the micellar structure of the phenolic substrates forbids the access to the dimeric substrate from other phenoxy radicals. Over time, the alcohol in the dimeric product (m/z 2299) was found to be oxidized by enzymes to the corresponding carbonyl products as shown in the mass spectra (peak with m/z 2297). It seems that only one hydroxyl group is being oxidized, because no peaks corresponding to the products with multiple oxidation were observed.

The formation of this dimeric product most likely occurred through a phenoxy radical intermediate generated by the oxidation of the phenol subunit. Dimerization of the phenolic β-O-4 substrate via intermolecular phenoxy radical cross-coupling would produce product with the construction of carbon–carbon or carbon–oxygen bonds like the 5–5 or 4-O-5 linkages in lignin [21]. According to the NMR studies by Butler et al. [21], the product from dimerization is very likely to be formed by the 5–5 linkage.

Previously, Rittstieg et al. [22] used guaiacylglycerol-β-guaiacyl ether, a compound with structure similar to substrate (I) but without the NIMS tag to study laccase activity. In their study, a polymeric precipitate was observed following treatment of the substrate with laccase, which was attributed to a free-radical initiated polymerization reaction. Interestingly, we did not observe any precipitation in the present study. We attribute this to a putative influence of the NIMS probe, which may inhibit polymerization, meaning that only monomeric compounds are formed. This finding is consistent with the work of Gold et al. [23] who added a methoxy group at the 5′ position to prevent polymerization. While indeed the NIMS probe may be advantageous for the prevention of polymerization, it may also introduce bias due to the interactions of the fluorous tag with the enzyme and this topic will be an important area for future investigation.

The potential mechanism for the formation of products from phenolic β-aryl ether substrate (I) is shown in Fig. 4. The phenoxy radical intermediate II, generated by the oxidation of phenolic substrate I by laccase through single electron transfer, can delocalize to form resonance structure III. The loss of another electron from this carbon radical by laccase oxidation affords an important cation intermediate IV. Two distinct pathways are probably operational here and depend on the phenoxy radical intermediate (II). Pathway 1 involves the Cα–Cβ bond cleavage [2325], followed by rapid cleavage of the CβO ether bond to form product IX. Cα–Cβ bond cleavage can also proceed through the phenoxy radical intermediates of the phenolic β-aryl ether substrate I or its Cα-oxo-product VII. Alternatively, the carbon–carbon single bond between the Cα and the aryl carbon can be cleaved. Again, the phenoxy radical is the intermediate needed to initiate the entire reaction cascade to produce aldehyde product VIII. For both reactions of laccase and MnP with phenolic β-aryl ether substrate, aldehyde product VIII is consistently produced in higher amounts than product IX, which indicates that the pathway with the cleavage of the Cα-alkyl phenyl bond is predominant relative to the pathway with the Cα–Cβ bond cleavage. Product X (with m/z 1045) is presumably the hydrate form of aldehyde VIII.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Possible mechanism of product formation in enzymatic reaction of phenolic β-aryl ether substrate (I)

Interestingly, when methanol was added to quench the reaction, the peak corresponding to the hydrate of aldehyde (m/z 1045) was reduced significantly and the new peak appearing at m/z 1059 was consistent with the formation of a product from the methanolysis of aldehyde VIII. When deuterated methanol (CD3OD) was used to quench the reaction, as expected, the mass peak with m/z 1062 appeared. These results confirmed the identity of aldehyde VIII.

The time course of an enzymatic reaction contains valuable information about the properties of the enzyme. By obtaining product distribution at different time points in the enzymatic reaction, we can determine the reaction pathways, bottleneck steps in the reaction and key enzyme parameters, etc. In our NIMS-based enzyme assay, substrate and products concentrations were measured by the relative intensity of the m/z signals of each compound. It is important to point out a few attributes of these assays. Since both substrates and products possess highly similar fluorous tails and, thus, the dimethyl arginine groups should enable different molecules with similar ionization efficiency in NIMS, so it is possible to directly compare ion intensities as an approximation of substrate and product concentrations. Also, since multiple products are measured simultaneously from a 0.2 μL sample (from a 10 μL reaction) at each time point the disturbance of the reaction is limited. These analyses also consume little of the precious synthetic substrates. Figure 5 shows the reaction time course of laccase with phenolic β-aryl ether substrate (I) at room temperature over a time period of 180 min. Over the course of the experiment, a continuous decrease of the phenolic β-aryl ether substrate is observed along with an increase in the product formation (products IX, VII, VIII) with the exception of the dimerization product which, after initial increase in relative abundance in the first h, was completely converted to oxidation product (with m/z 2297).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Time course of laccases with phenolic β-aryl ether substrate (I) over 3 h time period: 955 (IX in Fig. 4, green diamond); 1027 (VIII, red square); 1045 (X, green up triangle); 1149 (IV, purple cross); 1151 (I, pale blue asterisk); 2297 (orange solid circle); 2299 (gray plus sign)

As for the reaction of laccase with nonphenolic β-aryl ether substrate (Fig. 6), temperatures of 37 °C and longer reaction times were needed to accurately measure reaction products, and products profiles are different from those obtained when using the phenolic β-aryl ether substrate. Since there is no phenoxy radical intermediate, no product from the cleavage of carbon–carbon single bond between the Cα and the adjacent aryl carbon was observed. Cα-oxo-product XIV is predominant compared to product XV, which comes from the Cα–Cβ bond cleavage. In addition, HOBt was added to the reaction as a mediator compared to no HOBt being added to the reaction of laccase with phenolic substrate (I). It is known that laccase reactivity decreases with an increase of the steric encumbrance; the use of mediator, HOBt, can help to overcome the problems related to substrate accessibility [9]. In this case, the nonphenolic substrate (XII) may have greater difficulty entering the laccase active site compared to phenolic substrate (I). HOBt is a small molecule that can be oxidized by laccase to an intermediate with high redox potential, which can oxidize the nonphenolic substrate (XII) to the corresponding products. More interestingly, some products, likely from the oxidation of the phenyl ring [26], were observed as evidenced by m/z 1193, 1195, which correspond to the addition of a hydroxyl group on the aromatic ring [26] of substrates XII and Cα-oxo-product XIV. The location of the hydroxyl group on the ring is still unclear; however, a small peak with m/z 985 was detected which may indicate that the oxidation occurs on the phenyl ring linked to the Cβ through oxygen. When using identical reaction conditions, but without HOBt, only the substrate was detected using mass spectrometry.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Mass spectra (a) and possible mechanism (b) of laccases with nonphenolic β-aryl ether substrate XII. (1) The exact position of the additional hydroxyl group on the aromatic ring is uncertain. For simplicity, the drawing shows one of the three possible positions. (2) No activity was detected for MnP against the nonphenolic substrate

The structure of our model compounds is designed by coupling a fluorous tag with the β-O-4 dimer through a carbon chain. This design offers the opportunity to construct enantiomeric pure substrates with ease. The β-O-4 dimer itself has two chiral centers; therefore, there are four possible enantiomers. It is known that enzymes are chiral, and they can distinguish among enantiomers [27, 28]. To understand enzyme specificity, enantiomeric pure substrates are needed. Our approach (shown here) could easily be extended to prepare these important chiral substrates (e.g., each with different mass tags attached to ensure unique identity in mass spectrometry) by synthetic organic chemistry to study the enzyme specificity. Moreover, due to the multiplexing nature of our NIMS assays, multi-substrate/product systems can be utilized to thoroughly investigate the enzymatic activities/specificities. Progress in this area will be reported in the future. In addition to the approach using model compounds for the study of LMEs, development of post-reaction derivatization approach like those we have reported for analysis of glycosyl hydrolases [29] is an important direction for future research. These studies would have the advantages of minimizing experimental bias and allow analysis of enzymes against the most process relevant feedstocks.


In summary, we have synthesized two β-aryl ether substrates suitable for high-throughput assaying of lignin-modifying enzymes by NIMS. In solution, these amphiphilic molecules tend to form micelles. Use of these substrates to assay a laccase and a manganese peroxidase revealed that phenolic and nonphenolic β-aryl ether substrates demonstrate different primary reaction pathways due to the availability of the phenoxy radical intermediates. Further work will focus on preparing other model lignin compounds suitable for NIMS analysis to study catalysis of breaking lignin bond linkages. Together with the substrates already prepared for studying the activities of cellulases and hemicellulases, this pool of substrates forms the basis for a powerful mass spectrometry-based multiplexing assay, which has the ability to simultaneously detect multiple functions of enzymes (or enzyme cocktails) responsible for the deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass. Ultimately, this approach may potentially aid in identifying more efficient, low cost enzyme cocktails useful for converting all biomass polymers into valuable bioproducts.

Experimental section


The syntheses of phenolic and nonphenolic β-O-4 aryl ether model compounds are outlined in Additional file 1: Scheme S1 and S2 and detailed synthetic procedures are provided in Additional file 1.


The laccases (0.5 U/mg, solid cultures from Trametes versicolor) and manganese peroxidases (solid cultures from the white rot fungus, Nematoloma frowardii, Cat. No. EN-201S) used in this study were purchased from Aldrich and Jena Bioscience, respectively.

Enzyme assays and conversion of products

  1. A.
    Laccase and manganese peroxidase (MnP) with phenolic substrate I.
    1. 1.

      Laccase reaction. Prepare laccase (solid, 0.5 U/mg from Aldrich) stock solution with a concentration of 1.5 mg/mL in sodium acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 4.6). Then, to a clear, thick-walled 0.2 mL PCR tube (Axygen) add 10 μL of the above laccase solution and 1 μL of phenolic substrate I (e.g., 5 mM stock solution in D.I. water). The resulting mixture was mixed by a Vortex mixer and incubated at room temperature with indicated time.

    2. 2.

      MnP reaction. Prepare MnP (solid, 200 U/mg from Jena Bioscience) stock solution with a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL in sodium acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 4.6). Next prepare the experimental buffer solution by adding solid sodium malonate and MnCl2 to sodium acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 4.6) to make the final concentration of sodium malonate and MnCl2 as 50 mM and 10 mM, respectively. Then, to a clear, thick-walled 0.2 mL PCR tube (Axygen) add 5 μL of the above MnP stock solution, 5 μL of the above experimental buffer solution (containing sodium malonate and MnCl2), and one μL of phenolic substrate I (5 mM stock solution in D.I. water). The resulting mixture was mixed by a Vortex mixer and incubated at room temperature with indicated time.

  2. B.

    Laccase with nonphenolic substrate XII.

    Prepare laccase (solid, 0.5 U/mg from Aldrich) stock solution with a concentration of 1.5 mg/mL in sodium acetate buffer (100 mM, pH 4.6). Then, to a clear, thick-walled 0.2 mL PCR tube (Axygen) add 10 μL of the above laccase solution, one μL of phenolic substrate XII (5 mM stock solution in D.I. water) and 1 μL of 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt, 3.4 mM stock solution in D.I. water). The resulting mixture was mixed by a Vortex mixer and incubated at 37 °C with indicated time.


Nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS)

In each case, 0.2 µL of the quenched reaction sample was spotted onto the NIMS surface and removed after 30 s. A grid drawn manually on the NIMS chip using a diamond-tip scribe helped with spotting and identification of sample spots in the spectrometer. Chips were loaded using a modified standard MALDI plate. NIMS analysis was performed using a 4800 MALDI TOF/TOF mass analyzer from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Signal intensities were identified for the ions of the products and ~ 1000 laser shots were collected.



nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry


lignin-modifying enzymes


manganese peroxidases


matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry


deuterated methanol


small-angle neutron scattering

D.I. water: 

deionized water

PCR tube: 

polymerase chain reaction tube


manganese(II) dichloride


Authors’ contributions

KD and TRN conceived the study. KD synthesized the perfluorinated substrates. KD and J.Z. designed and performed experiments. GC measured micelle formation. KD and TRN wrote the manuscript. KLS, BAS, AKS and PDA discussed, revised and checked the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


The DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, through contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. This manuscript has been authored by an author at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government retains, and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges, that the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Additional file contains a description of substrate synthesis and NMR spectra.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.


This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, through contract DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong, 643000, Sichuan, China
Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100080, China
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA


  1. Chen H. Biotechnology of lignocellulose theory and practice. Springer: Chemical Industry Press; 2014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Welker CM, Balasubramanian VK, Petti C, Rai KM, DeBolt S, Mendu V. Engineering plant biomass lignin content and composition for biofuels and bioproducts. Energy. 2015;8:7654–76.Google Scholar
  3. Rinaldi R, Jastrzebski R, Clough MT, Ralph J, Kennema M, Brijinincx PCA, Weckhuysen BM. Paving the way for lignin valorization: recent advances in bioengineering, biorefining and catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:8164–215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Galkin MV, Samec JS. Lignin valorization through catalytic lignocellulose fractionation: a fundamental platform for the future biorefinery. ChemSusChem. 2016;9:1544–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ragauskas AJ, et al. Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science. 2014;344:1246843. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kameshwar A, Qin W. Qualitative and quantitative methods for isolation and characterization of lignin-modifying enzymes secreted by microorganisms. Bioenergy Res. 2017;10:248–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hatakka A. Lignin-modifying enzymes from selected white-rot fungi: production and role in lignin degradation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994;13:125–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown ME, Chang MCY. Exploring bacterial lignin degradation. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2014;19:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Christopher LP, Yao B, Ji Y. Lignin biodegradation with laccase-mediator systems. Front Energy Res. 2014;2:12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yue F, Lu F, Ralph S, Ralph J. Identification of 4-O-5 units in softwood lignins via definitive lignin models and NMR. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:1909–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sakakibara A. Chemistry of Lignin. In: Hon DN-S, Shiraishi N, editors. Wood and cellulosic chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Weinstein DA, Gold MH. Synthesis of guaiacylglycol and glycerol-β-O-(β-methylumbelliferyl) ethers: lignin model substrates for the possible fluorometric assay of β-etherases. Holzforschung. 1979;33:134–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Otsuka Y, Sonoki T, Ikeda S, Kajita S, Nakamura M, Katayama Y. Detection and characterization of a novel extracellular fungal enzyme that catalyzes the specific and hydrolytic cleavage of lignin guaiacylglycerol β-aryl ether linkages. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:2353–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Northen TR, Yanes O, Northen MT, Marrinucci D, Uriboonthai W, Apon J, Golledge SL, Nordstrom A, Siuzdak G. Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry. Nature. 2007;449:1033–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Northen TR, Lee J-C, Hoang L, Raymond J, Hwang D-R, Yannone SM, Wong C-H, Siuzdak G. A nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry-based enzyme activity assay. PNAS. 2008;105:3678–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Reindl W, Deng K, Gladden JM, Cheng G, Wong A, Singer SW, Singh S, Lee J-C, Yao C-H, Hazen TC, Singh AK, Simmons BA, Adams PD, Northen TR. Colloid-based multiplexed screening for plant biomass-degrading glycoside hydrolase activities in microbial communities. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4:2884–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Deng K, George KW, Reindl W, Keasling JD, Adams PD, Lee TS, Singh AK, Northen TR. Encoding substrates with mass tags to resolve stereospecific reactions using nimzyme. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrosc. 2012;26:611–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Greving M, Cheng X, Reindl W, Bowen B, Deng K, Louie K, Nyman M, Cohen J, Singh A, Simmons B, Adams P, Siuzdak G, Northen T. Acoustic deposition with NIMS as a high throughput enzyme activity assay. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403(3):707–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Deng K, Guenther JM, Gao J, Bowen BP, Tran H, Reyes-Ortiz V, Cheng X, Sathitsuksanoh N, Heins R, Takasuka TE, Bergeman LF, Geertz-Hansen H, Deutsch S, Loque D, Sale KL, Simmons BA, Adams PD, Singh AK, Fox BG, Northen TR. Development of a high throughput platform for screening glycoside hydrolases based on oxime-NIMS. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:153.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Sagisaka M, Ono S, James C, Yoshizawa A, Mohamed A, Guittard F, Rogers SE, Heenan RK, Yan C, Eastoe J. Effect of fluorocarbon and hydrocarbon chain lengths in hybrid surfactants for supercritical CO2. Langmuir. 2015;31:7479–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Springer SD, He J, Chui M, Little RD, Foston M, Butler A. Peroxidative oxidation of lignin and a lignin model compound by a manganese SALEN derivative. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016;4:3212–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rittstieg K, Suurnakki A, Suortti T, Kruus K, Guebitz G, Buchert J. Investigation on the laccase-catalyzed polymerization of lignin model compounds using size-exclusion HPLC. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2002;31:403–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tuor U, Wariishi H, Schoemaker HE, Gold MH. Oxidation of phenolic arylglycerol β-aryl ether lignin model compounds by manganese peroxidase from phanerochaete chrysosporium: oxidative cleavage of an α–carbonyl model compound. Biochemistry. 1992;31:4986–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zeng JJ, Mills MJ, Simmons BA, Kent MS, Sale KL. Understanding factors controlling depolymerization and polymerization in catalytic degradation β-ether linked model lignin compounds by versatile peroxidase. Green Chem. 2017;19:2145–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Umezawa T, Higuchi T. Aromatic ring cleavage of β-O-4 lignin substructure model dimers by lignin peroxidase of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. FEBS Lett. 1985;192:147–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ullrich R, Martin Hofrichter M. Enzymatic hydroxylation of aromatic compounds. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:271–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Helmich KE, et al. Structural basis of stereospecificity in the bacterial enzymatic cleavage of β-aryl ether bonds in lignin. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:5234–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pereira JH, et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of the early and late enzymes in the lignin β-aryl ether cleavage pathway from Sphingobium sp. SYK-6. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:10228–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Deng K, Takasuka TE, Heins R, Cheng X, Bergeman LF, Shi J, Aschenbrener R, Deutsch S, Singh S, Sale KL, Simmons BA, Adams PD, Singh AK, Fox BG, Northen TR. Rapid kinetic characterization of glycosyl hydrolases based on oxime derivatization and nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS). ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9(7):1470–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2018