Skip to main content

Comprehensive understanding of the effects of metallic cations on enzymatic hydrolysis of humic acid-pretreated waste wheat straw

Abstract

Background

Humic acids (HA) have been used in biorefinery process due to its surfactant properties as an aid to the pretreatment of lignocellulose, with results indicating a positive effect on delignification. However, the HA remaining on the surface of the pretreated lignocellulose has also been shown to provide a negative effect on ensuing enzymatic digestibility. Hence, a strategy of complexing metallic cations with HA prior to enzymatic hydrolysis was proposed and demonstrated in this work in an effort to provide a means of HA mitigation that does not involve significant water consumption via extensive washing.

Results

Results showed that the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of waste wheat straw decreased from 81.9% to 66.1% when it was pretreated by 10 g/L HA, attributed to the inhibition ability of the residual HA on enzyme activity of cellulase with a debasement of 36.3%. Interestingly, enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency could be increased from 66.1% to 77.3% when 10 mM Fe3+ was introduced to the system and allowed to associate with HA during saccharification.

Conclusions

The addition of high-priced metallic cations (Fe3+) has successfully alleviated the effect of HA on cellulase activity. It is our hope in demonstrating the complexation affinity between metallic cations and HA, future researchers and biorefinery developers will evaluate this strategy as a unit operation that could allow economic biorefining of WWS to produce valuable biochemicals, biofuels, and biomaterials.

Background

The efficient development and utilization of bioenergy will allow humanity to better address the energy and ecological problems it currently faces [1, 2]. Bioenergy has a wide range of sources, including forestry resources, agricultural resources, industrial waste, municipal solid waste, and livestock manure [3, 4]. As a part of agricultural resources, wheat straw has attracted significant interest for its utility as a bioenergy feedstock due to its worldwide abundance [5]. One practice used in China is to manufacture paper from wheat straw. However, some residues are abandoned during this process. These abandoned materials consist of wheat leaves, ears, straw scraps, and free ash, all of which are screened out and collective, known as waste wheat straw (WWS). WWS is chemically composed of cellulose (24–28%), hemicellulose (20–22%), lignin (18–22%), and ash (28–30%) [6]. The abundance of carbohydrates in the WWS renders it a promising candidate for biomass-based fuels or biochemicals. Major difficulties in the bioconversion scheme for WWS include its intrinsic heterogeneity, as well as its recalcitrance toward cellulolytic enzymatic hydrolysis [7]. To address the recalcitrance, a pretreatment operation is necessary to eliminate the physical barriers preventing WWS from further disassembly. In previous studies, the compact structure of WWS has been conquered through application of autohydrolysis pretreatment, which is an economical and ecofriendly pretreatment technology [8, 9]. However, a large amount of ash present in WWS presented its own set of challenges for autohydrolysis due to a hydrolyzate-buffering effect [10, 11].

A relatively simple method for dealing with this problematic effect provided by ash is prewashing, which was previously investigated in earlier works [6]. 500 mL/g WWS water consumption can increase the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency by 30.11%. While the ash is regarded as a problem for utilization of WWS, one key finding from a recent work was that the organic portion of the ash in WWS actually provides a positive effect on the pretreatment by assisting delignification [12]. These organic components in the ash fraction are mainly humic acids (HA). The basic structure of the HA is an aromatic ring and an alicyclic ring, functional groups (mostly hydroxyl and carboxyl group) is attached to the ring [13]. HA is a complex mixture of high weight hydrophobic and hydrophilic molecules, which function as natural surfactants due to their amphiphilic properties [13, 14]. Research on surfactants in the field of biorefinery mainly focuses on two points. Firstly, surfactants can enhance substrate hydrophilicity by reducing the surface tension between two liquid phases during the pretreatment [15, 16]. Secondly, surfactants have also been shown to enhance cellulolytic enzymatic digestion of lignocellulosic substrates by reducing non-specific adsorption of lignin on the surface of lignocellulose [17, 18]. Currently, the research on surfactants in the field of biorefinery is more inclined to synthetic surfactants, i.e., PEG, SDS, Tween rather than natural surfactants. The utility of naturally derived surfactants, like HA, has actually garnered significant industrial interest over the past decade due to its non-toxic, ecologically safe, and high surface activity [19]. It is this value-added property of an otherwise problematic element of WWS that we believe will assist in the industrial realization of a WWS-based biorefinery process.

The addition of neat HA into an autohydrolysis medium has been performed using prewashed WWS in our previous work, and we found that the HA has a positive effect on delignification during the autohydrolysis of WWS [20]. This is mainly due to the fact that HA acted as a co-solvent to solubilize the hydrophobic polymers. However, it was also found that pretreated WWS with HA was unable to achieve sufficient great conversion of cellulose due to the presence of residual HA adsorbed onto the surfaces of the WWS. It has been reported that HA can interact with proteases, lead to modification of the protein structure and character, consequently, change protein biological activity [21, 22]. Therefore, the HA remaining on the surface of WWS requires a lot of water to clean to enhance the downstream enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency. Considering the economic cost of biorefinery, it is necessary to find a simple additive to eliminate the adverse effects of HA on enzymatic hydrolysis. The HA can interact with a variety of solutes due to its complex functional groups, including hydrophobic interaction, chelation or complexation [23]. Preeminent among the interactions of HA with solutes are metallic cations [24]. The metallic cations bonded with HA through cation exchange and electrostatic force adsorption to form complexes or chelates [25]. Therefore, whether the negative effect of HA on enzymatic hydrolysis can be eliminated by adding metallic cations during the enzymatic hydrolysis is worth further investigation.

In this work, the negative effect of HA on cellulase activity has been investigated. Next, different metallic cations (K+, Na+, Ca2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Al3+) were introduced into the HA colloid solution to determine its effect on the enzyme activity. Furthermore, the zeta potential and dynamic viscosity of the suspension formed by metallic cations and HA were measured to prove the inner interactions. At last, the best-performing cations were added into the enzymatic hydrolysis of HA-pretreated WWS to overcome the effects of HA on cellulase. This work is intended to further knowledge into the complicated topic of utilizing humic acids in a way the benefits the overall prospects of a biorefining process based on WWS.

Results and discussion

Compositional analysis of WWS and pretreated AWWS

It is first important to understand how chemical compositions of our test materials vary as a function of the processes they are subjected to. The prewashed WWS was analyzed for chemical composition, and the results are included in Table 1. Specifically, this material was composed of (on a dry basis) 36.0% glucan, 26.1% xylan, 23.3% lignin (20.1% acid-insoluble lignin and 3.2% acid-soluble lignin) and 9.1% ash. Next, washed and unwashed autohydrolyzed WWS (AWWS) in the presence of 10 g/L HA was analyzed. The washed AWWS was found to comprise 49.5% glucan, 11.6% xylan, and 30.1% lignin (29.1% acid-insoluble lignin and 1.0% acid-soluble lignin), and the unwashed AWWS was found to comprise 44.2% glucan, 10.1% xylan, and 28.7% lignin (27.7% acid-insoluble lignin and 1.0% acid-soluble lignin). Meanwhile, the quantity of residual HA in unwashed AWWS was measured to be 0.05 g/g substrate, while the HA was not detected in the washed AWWS. It displayed that the difference between washed and unwashed AWWS was the fraction of HA. Whether this residual HA can be beneficial to downstream cellulase hydrolysis of AWWS like other active agents, needs to be verified by saccharification of washed and unwashed AWWS.

Table 1 The composition of raw WWS and AWWS

The effects of residual HA on enzymatic hydrolysis of AWWS

Enzymatic hydrolysis is a key step in biorefinery operations, which requires a consortium of different enzymes that can hydrolyze cellulose and hemicellulose into fermentable monosaccharides [26]. In the context of this work, enzymatic hydrolysis was performed on unwashed and washed AWWS to estimate the effect of residual HA on enzymatic hydrolysis. Results are shown in Fig. 1. The enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of unwashed AWWS was 66.1%, while that of washed AWWS was 81.9%. The results showed that the act of thoroughly washing the substrate had a prominently positive effect on the cellulose conversion of the pretreated samples. This is most likely due to the remaining HA attached to the surface on the unwashed AWWS affecting the cellulase’s activity. The operation of washing can successfully remove the residual HA, and then increase the conversion rate of cellulose. Washing is considered to be the easiest way to remove the non-sugar compounds (i.e., furan derivatives, carboxylic acids, phenolic compounds) that have a negative effect on downstream enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation process after the pretreatment of lignocellulose [27, 28]. However, the washing operation consumes a lot of water, causing waste of resources and environmental problems [4, 29]. In order to address the influence of residual HA on enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency, HA’s effects on cellulase activity were firstly investigated.

Fig. 1
figure1

The enzymatic hydrolysis of washed and unwashed AWWS

The effects of HA on cellulase activity and protein adsorption

As reported in the literature, filter paper enzyme activity (FPA) is measured as a proxy for the total enzyme activity of cellulase [30]. Given that we sought to learn how HA affects enzymatic activity, experiments were conducted which evaluate FPA of cellulase with and without exposure to HA. As shown in Fig. 2, the FPA decreased from 100% (original enzymatic activity, 225 FPU/g) to 63.7% with HA present at the concentration of 2.5 g/L. This could only be due to the interaction between HA and cellulase affecting its activity. It has been reported that the mechanism by which HA reduced cellulase activity involved the HA either adsorbing domains of the protein or by forming HA–protein complexes [22]. To evaluate the mechanism, the quantity of enzyme protein adsorbed by HA was measured (Fig. 2). Our findings revealed a negative relationship between the quantity of free enzyme protein and the concentration of HA in the system, which indicated that the amount of enzyme protein adsorbed enhanced as the concentration of HA increased. Specifically, we calculated that 376.7 mg of enzyme proteins were adsorbed by HA at a concentration of 2.5 g/L. Previous research has reported that hydrophobic interactions govern the tendency for HA to adsorb to negatively charged proteins (such as insulin, ribonuclease), causing the protein to become encapsulated and lose its functionality [31, 32]. It has also been reported that the interaction between HA and oppositely charged polyelectrolytes has largely been directed to binding by complexation and covalent bonding [33, 34]. However, because cellulase and HA are both polyanions negative charge, it is improbably that polyelectrolyte complexation is playing a role in this system. Instead, it appears that HA is reducing cellulase activity through the aforementioned hydrophobic interactions between them. The probable schematic diagram of the interaction between the HA and cellulase is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure2

The cellulase activity ratio and adsorbed protein amount of the HA and cellulase suspension

Fig. 3
figure3

Diagram of the interaction between HA with cellulase and metallic cations

Complexation of humic acid with metallic cations

From an industrial point of view, the washing step during biorefinery leads to a large consumption of water. This volume will inevitably increase biorefinery processing costs, which may lead to disinterest process industrialization of a WWS-based process. In order to evaluate one possible strategy for mitigating the unfavorable effects of HA on enzymatic hydrolysis, metallic cations were applied to the system in an attempt to complex residual HA present in AWWS, as shown in Fig. 3. Ideally, the complexation will reduce HA’s impact on downstream unit operations (enzymatic hydrolysis). This strategy has been reported previously in the literature [33, 35]. Complexation of different metallic cations (K+, Na+, Ca2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Al3+) with HA colloidal solutions was evaluated by measuring both zeta potential and dynamic viscosity after complexation. This information was then used to determine which cations are superior for mitigating loss in cellulase activity for more efficient hydrolysis of AWWS.

Zeta potential and dynamic viscosity

It has been reported that HA can act as a molecular ligand, providing a coordination bond for complexes with metallic cations [36, 37]. This interaction is usually driven by electrostatic forces [35]. In this work, the zeta potential of the suspension containing HA and various cations was determined to verify electrostatic adsorption. The results can be seen in Table 2. First, we recorded the zeta potential of a HA-only suspension at −26.8 mV. However, when the cations were added, the negative potential was gradually reduced. For some cations, the value reached positivity at the maximum tested cation loading (Fe3+ and Al3+, 4.8 mV and 3.6 mV, respectively). The higher valence cations likely have greater electrostatic potential that allows for more coordination with HA [22, 37]. Therefore, the higher valence of the metallic cations under the same concentration and the more HA was complexed to it. It has also been reported that HA can be electrostatically adsorbed by metallic cations, causing these complexes to precipitate [38]. This complexation should reduce interactions between HA and cellulase protein.

Table 2 The remainder of cations and zeta potential in metallic cations and HA suspensions

Dynamic viscosity is another metric that can be used to evaluate the extent of complexation between HA and the tested cations [39]. In order to prove the complexation between HA and metallic cations, the dynamic viscosity of mixed suspension was also measured as reported in the literature [40]. As shown in Fig. 4, the dynamic viscosity of raw HA-only solutions was 1.13 mPa/s. However, the addition of metallic cations reduced the viscosity of the HA solution to different degrees (1.11 mPa/s K+, 1.11 mPa/s Na+, 1.06 mPa/s Ca2+, 1.02 mPa/s Fe2+, 1.01 mPa/s Fe3+ and 1.03 mPa/s Al3+). This is similar to the result of potential, which may be related to the valence and activity of cations. Of the tested cations, Fe3+ lowered the viscosity to the greatest extent (1.01 mPa/s, similar to the value of deionized water). According to Ghosh and Schnitzer [41], humic molecules became more rarefied as metal coordination occurs, which they suggested was due to the bridging of neighboring segments of the macromolecules. Therefore, the decrease of the dynamic viscosity in HA suspension was due to lower solute content. Because of the violently complexing ability of Fe3+, HA in the solution was completely precipitated, which may be detrimental to the interaction of HA and cellulase.

Fig. 4
figure4

The dynamic viscosity of the suspensions of HA and metallic cations

Quantity of metallic cations complexed by HA

To calculate the extent of metallic cation complexation, the concentration of the remainder of metallic cations was detected under the premise of excessive metallic cations concentration (10 mM). It can be seen that the concentration of the residual metallic cations including K+, Na+, Ca2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, and Al3+ all decreased into 4.8 mM, 6.3 mM, 0.7 mM, 0.3 mM, 0.1 mM, and 0.2 mM, respectively (Table 2). These results again showed that the greatest extent of coordination involved cations with higher valences. Trivalent iron was the most adsorbed cation amongst all those tested, with the amount complexed being about 4.0 mM Fe3+/g-HA. It has been reported that HA is negatively charged and exists as micelles in the aqueous phase, which can form complexes with protons and metallic cations [22, 42]. According to the Hofmeister series, there is an affinity order for the adsorption of cations and colloidal solutions (Na+  < K+  < Ca2+  < Cu2+  < Al3+  < Fe3+) [43, 44]. This series is in agreement with our observed patterns, including trivalent iron exhibiting the greatest extent of coordination. It has also been reported that the complexing capacity of HA for Al3+ and Fe3+ was 0.7–3.5 mM/g-HA [45]. All of the previously discussed results and citations were in agreement that valence was the key driver of complexation between HA and metallic cations.

Cellulase activity and protein adsorption

With the understanding of which cations are most effective for potentially neutering HA’s negative effects on cellulase, we next endeavored to quantify how cellulase activity and protein adsorption changes as a function of cation treatment of HA. Results from Fig. 5a revealed that the cellulase activity of the treated suspensions all increased due to the complexation. The same concentration (10 mM) of K+, Na+, Ca2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, and Al3+ added to the suspension of HA resulted in the cellulase activity improving from 63.7% (control) to 74.2%, 75.4%, 86.2%, 93.3%, 98.4%, and 96.4%, respectively. Fe3+ again showed the greatest effect upon improving enzyme activity. In addition, we also measured the concentration of free enzyme protein in these mixed systems. These results are included in Fig. 5b. From these measurements, it can be seen that the free protein concentration of the suspension increased to varying extents due to the addition of metallic cations. This was likely because of the complex interaction of metallic cations with HA, which reduced the adsorption of cellulase by HA. The increase of cellulase activity was also likely due to the decrease in the content of enzyme protein ineffectively adsorbed by HA. Therefore, the introduction of metallic cations can reduce ineffective adsorption of HA on cellulase and in turn elevate increase cellulase activity.

Fig. 5
figure5

The cellulase activity ratio (a) and free protein concentration (b) of the suspension of the HA and metallic cations

Improvement of enzymatic hydrolysis of unwashed materials with Fe3+

To reduce the economic costs brought by washing and increase the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis of HA-pretreated WWS, Fe3+ was applied to the enzymatic hydrolysis of AWWS as an alternative method for overcoming the negative effects of HA. The experimental data from this assay are shown in Fig. 6. It displayed that the enzymatic efficiency of the unwashed AWWS was increased to 77.3% when the 10 mM Fe3+ was added, while the unwashed AWWS was only 66.1%. This is likely due to Fe3+ complexation capacity for the residual HA in AWWS. This interaction in turn allowed for the elimination of HA’s adverse effects on cellulase, which is consistent with the previous results. The electrostatic adsorption of Fe3+ and HA effectively relieved the ineffective adsorption of cellulase by HA. From an economic perspective, a relatively small dosage number of metallic cations was shown to be just as effective at preserving enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency as the implementation of a large volume substrate washing step that also elevates a given biorefinery process’ environmental impact. It is our hope that the strategy demonstrated in this work will be adopted into other investigations intended to aid the realization of biorefinery processes based upon WWS.

Fig. 6
figure6

The enzymatic hydrolysis of unwashed pretreated PWWS with Fe3+ added

Conclusions

Humic acids, a natural surfactant, have been previously demonstrated as negatively influencing enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. It is believed that this may be due to residual humic acid from WWS pretreatment inhibiting the cellulase activity via a mechanism involving adsorption of enzyme protein. Interestingly, the addition of metallic cations (specifically Fe3+) resulted in observable complexation between humic acid and cations, which neutered the negative effects of humic acid upon enzymatic conversion of humic acid -pretreated WWS. Compared with other cations, Fe3+ is a superior additive that can effectively eliminate the effect of residual humic acid on enzymatic hydrolysis after humic acid pretreatment. This work successfully demonstrates an alternative method for decreasing the negative effects of soil-borne humic acid on biorefining of agricultural wastes.

Methods

Materials and reagents

Waste wheat straw (WWS) was supplied by the Shandong Quanlin Group (Shandong, China). The large amount (69.2%) of ash contained in the WWS was washed out using tap water at 1:10 (w/v) for five times, and stored at 4 °C [6]. Commercial cellulase (Cellic® CTec.2.0) was provided from Novozymes North America (Franklinton, NC). Humic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China), and metallic salts (KCl, NaCl, CaCl2, FeCl2·4H2O, FeCl3·6H2O, AlCl3) was analytical grade and purchased from Nanjing Reagent Company (Nanjing, China). Bradford reagent and bovine serum protein standard solution were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China).

Pretreatment with HA

A dry weight of 50 g prewashed WWS was subjected to autohydrolysis with 0.1 g/g-substrate of HA in the distilled water medium. Autohydrolysis took place in 1.25 L stirred reactors (HH-SJ6CD, Youlian, China) at 180 °C for 40 min at a component mass ratio of 1:10 (w/v) WWS to the water [20]. After pretreatment, the reactors were cooled rapidly via submersion into an ice water bath. The pretreated slurry was then pressed using cheesecloth to recover the autohydrolyzed WWS (AWWS, Solid fraction). The AWWS was divided into two parts, with one half washed with deionized water thoroughly until its wash filtrate reached neutrality. The remaining half was kept unwashed. Residual HA content in unwashed AWWS was measured by forced ion exchange method under nitrogen with either a Na4P2O7 solution (0.5 M, pH 9.0) and a NaOH solution (0.5 M, pH 13.5) using sample-to-solvent ratios of 1:10, which is based on the method provided by IHSS (International Humus Society) [46]. Unwashed and washed AWWS were finally stored in sealed plastic bags at 4 °C.

Enzymatic hydrolysis of unwashed and washed AWWS

Both unwashed and washed AWWS were subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis by cellulase (Cellic® CTec2) at a substrate-to-sodium citrate solution (50 mM, pH 4.8) ratio of 5% (w/v) in 150-mL bottles. When AWWS was enzymatically hydrolyzed in the presence of FeCl3, sodium citrate solution was made to contain 1 mM, 5 mM, and 10 mM FeCl3. Enzyme loadings were 20 FPU/g glucan for all experiments. Enzymatic hydrolysis was conducted at 50 °C for 72 h using a thermostat shaker (Vortex-2, Shanghai, China) at 150 rpm for slurry agitation. Individual 0.2 mL aliquots were taken at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. Each sample was frozen and preserved until further analysis. The collected samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min to obtain a supernatant which was analyzed for sugars by HPLC (Agilent 1260 Series) [47]. Enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of the AWWS was calculated according to the following equation:

$${\text{Enzymatic}\;\text{ hydrolysis}\;\text{efficiency}}\left( \% \right)=\frac{{{\text{Glucose}\;\text{in}\;\text{enzymatic}\;\text{hydrolysate}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) \times 0.9}}{{{\text{Glucan}\;\text{in}\;\text{AWWS}}\left( {\text{g}} \right)}} \times 100\% ,$$

where 0.9 is the factor that converts glucose to equivalent glucan. All experiments were done in duplicate.

The complexation between HA and metallic cations

In order to investigate the interaction of HA with different metallic cations, verification experiments were conducted. First, the HA was suspended into deionized water at a concentration was 2.5 g/L (w/v). This value was based on the concentration of residual HA in unwashed AWWS. The turbid suspension was then stirred for 24 h at 25 °C to achieve homogeneity using a thermostatic oscillator (Vortex-2, Shanghai, China). System pH was measured to be 6.5 ± 0.2. After stirring time, the mixture was divided into equal parts for mixing with different species and concentrations of metallic salts (control, KCl, NaCl, CaCl2, FeCl2·4H2O, FeCl3·6H2O, AlCl3). Mixed solutions were adjusted to pH 6.5 ± 0.2 with 0.1 M NaOH. These new mixtures were again stirred for 24 h at 25 °C using the same setup described above. At the conclusion of mixing time, each suspension was centrifuged to remove the complexed HA and then stored at 4 °C for further investigation and analysis.

Analytical methods

The chemical compositional analysis of raw WWS and AWWS

The chemical compositions of the raw WWS and AWWS were determined according to a protocol from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL [48]. The concentration of sugars (glucose, xylose, galactose, and arabinose) in each sample’s acid digestate was quantified by a high-performance liquid chromatography HPLC (Agilent 1260 series, Agilent Technologies, USA) using an Aminex HPX-87H column with 5 mM H2SO4 as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min at 55 °C.

Residual metallic cations of the complexed HA suspensions

In order to detect the number of metallic cations complexed by HA in colloidal solution, cation contents of the supernatants from HA and metallic cations mixtures were determined with an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS, NexION300X, PerkinElmer, USA). Samples were diluted by a factor of 1000 prior to testing. The working parameters of the ICP-MS were 1.6 kW of high-frequency power, 16.0 L/min of plasma gas flow rate, 1.1 mL/min auxiliary airflow rate, 0.1 mL/min of sample lift rate. All samples were measured in triplicate and are displayed as averages.

Zeta potential of the complexed HA suspensions

The zeta potential of the mixture solutions was determined by an SZP meter (Mütek SZP 06) with deionized water as a blank control. Three replicates were tested for each sample and the results are presented as averages.

Dynamic viscosity of the complexed HA suspensions

The supernatants of metallic cations and HA suspensions were evaluated for dynamic viscosity by a rheometer (RS 6000, Haake, German) [49]. Shear rate was increased linearly from 0 to 1000 s−1, and the corresponding viscosity values were recorded every 10 s−1. Temperatures were held at 25 °C. Reported viscosity values were taken between 700–900 s−1.

Cellulase activity and free protein quantities of the HA and complexed suspensions

In order to investigate the effect of the HA and mixed suspensions on cellulase activity, the solutions complexed suspensions were mixed with 1 g cellulase (Cellic® CTec.2.0) and stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The filter paper enzyme activity and free protein content of the mixed cellulase solutions were determined.

Relative enzyme activity was assayed by adding the cellulase solution and sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.8, 50 mM) to 1 × 6 cm Whatman No. 1 filter paper (50 mg) in the test tube, and reacting the contents in a water bath at 50 °C for 60 min. The total reaction volume was 1.5 mL. Next, 3 mL DNS was added and heated above 85 °C for 10 min to cease further hydrolysis reactions. Halted solutions were then diluted to 50 mL, and solution absorbance was measured at 540 nm with a UV–visible spectrophotometer. Glucose standard solutions (1.0 g/L, 1.2 g/L, 1.4 g/L, 1.6 g/L, 1.8 g/L, 2.0 g/L) were subjected to the same operations in order to establish a glucose standard equation [30]. The filter paper enzyme activity was calculated by the following formula:

$${\text{Filter}\;\text{paper}\;\text{enzyme}\;\text{activity}}\left( {{\text{FPIU}}/{\text{mL}}} \right)= \frac{{{\text{Glucose }}\left( {\text{g}} \right)}}{180 \times 60 \times 0.5} \times {\text{Enzyme}\;\text{dilution},}$$

where the 180 g/mol is the molar mass of glucose, 60 min is the reaction time, 0.5 ml is the volume of the test enzyme solution. Each data point was averaged from two replicates.

Protein determination was using the Bradford method as reported in the literature [50]. 0.2 mL of all samples were added to 10-mL stoppered test tubes (Zhisheng, Jiangsu, China), and 3.0 mL of staining agent was then added. Meanwhile, the mixing liquids were inverted to achieve homogeneity, at which point a timer was set. After 12 min passed, the absorbance of each liquid was measured at 595 nm by a UV–visible spectrophotometer. Deionized water was used as a blank control. Bovine serum protein (0.2 mg/mL, 0.4 mg/mL, 0.6 mg/mL, 0.8 mg/mL, and 1.0 mg/mL) as a protein standard was also subjected to the same operations to create a standard curve of protein concentration. Protein concentration in all samples was calculated from the absorbance. The adsorbed protein content is based on the total added protein content minus the free protein content in the supernatant. Each data point was averaged from two replicates.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed in this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

WWS:

Waste wheat straw

HA:

Humic acid

AWWS:

Autohydrolyzed waste wheat straw with 10 g/L humic acid

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

NREL:

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

FPA:

Filter paper enzyme activity

References

  1. 1.

    Bi TY. Research of development policy for renewable energy industry. Appl Mech Mater. 2013;291–294:1185–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lin W, Xing S, Jin Y, Lu X, Huang C, Yong Q. Insight into understanding the performance of deep eutectic solvent pretreatment on improving enzymatic digestibility of bamboo residues. Bioresour Technol. 2020;306:123163.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    An L, Si C, Wang G, Sui W, Tao Z. Enhancing the solubility and antioxidant activity of high-molecular-weight lignin by moderate depolymerization via in situ ethanol/acid catalysis. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;128:177–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chen J, Fan X, Zhang L, Chen X, Sun S, Sun RC. Research progress in lignin-based slow/controlled release fertilizer. Chemsuschem. 2020;13:4356–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Talebnia F, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4744–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huang C, Wu X, Huang Y, Lai C, Li X, Yong Q. Prewashing enhances the liquid hot water pretreatment efficiency of waste wheat straw with high free ash content. Bioresour Technol. 2016;219:583–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jönsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant NO. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin DB. Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29:675–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ling Z, Guo Z, Huang C, Yao L, Xu F. Deconstruction of oriented crystalline cellulose by novel levulinic acid based deep eutectic solvents pretreatment for improved enzymatic accessibility. Bioresour Technol. 2020;305:123025.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wu X, Huang C, Tang W, Huang C, Lai C, Yong Q. Use of metal chlorides during waste wheat straw autohydrolysis to overcome the self-buffering effect. Bioresour Technol. 2018;268:259–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tang W, Wu X, Huang C, Huang C, Lai C, Yong Q. Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of waste wheat straw by presoaking to reduce the ash-influencing effect on autohydrolysis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:222.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wu X, Tang W, Huang C, Huang C, Lai C, Yong Q. The effects of exogenous ash on the autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol. 2019;286:121411.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Klavins M, Purmalis O. Humic substances as surfactants. Environ Chem Lett. 2009;8:349–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Salati S, Papa G, Adani F. Perspective on the use of humic acids from biomass as natural surfactants for industrial applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29:913–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chang KL, Chen XM, Han YJ, Wang XQ, Potprommanee L, Ning XA, Liu JY, Sun J, Peng YP, Sun SY, Lin YC. Synergistic effects of surfactant-assisted ionic liquid pretreatment rice straw. Bioresour Technol. 2016;214:371–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chang KL, Han YJ, Wang XQ, Chen XM, Leu SY, Liu JY, Peng YP, Liao YL, Potprommanee L. The effect of surfactant-assisted ultrasound-ionic liquid pretreatment on the structure and fermentable sugar production of a water hyacinth. Bioresour Technol. 2017;237:27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Holmberg K. Interactions between surfactants and hydrolytic enzymes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;168:169–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lin W, Chen D, Yong Q, Huang C, Huang S. Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of acid-pretreated bamboo residues using amphiphilic surfactant derived from dehydroabietic acid. Bioresour Technol. 2019;293:122055.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Diallo MS, Abriola LM, Weber WJ. Solubilization of nonaqueous phase liquid hydrocarbons in micellar solutions of dodecyl alcohol ethoxylates. Environ Sci Technol. 1994;28:1829–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tang W, Wu X, Huang C, Huang C, Lai C, Yong Q. Humic acid-assisted autohydrolysis of waste wheat straw to sustainably improve enzymatic hydrolysis. Biores Technol. 2020;306:123103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jones KL, O’Melia CR. Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects ofpH and ionic strength. J Membr Sci. 2000;165:31–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tan WF, Koopal LK, Weng LP, van Riemsdijk WH, Norde W. Humic acid protein complexation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2008;72:2090–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Waller PA, Pickering WF. The lability of copper ions sorbed on humic acid. Chem Speciat Bioavailab. 2015;2:127–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Alfassi ZB. On the precipitation of salts/complexes of trivalent cations with humic acid. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2004;1:77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yuan G, Theng BKG, Parfiti RL, Percival HJ. Interactions of allophane with humic acid and cations. Eur J Soil Sci. 2008;51:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Antonopoulou I, Matsakas L, Christakopoulos P. Evaluation of Sporotrichum thermophile cellulolytic system for an efficient hydrolysis of cellulose. New Biotechnol. 2012;29:S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li X, Xu R, Yang J, Nie S, Liu D, Liu Y, Si C. Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid from lignocellulosic biomass and catalytic upgradation. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;130:184–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dai L, Jiang W, Zhou X, Xu Y. Enhancement in xylonate production from hemicellulose pre-hydrolysate by powdered activated carbon treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2020;316:123944.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Huang C, Dong H, Zhang Z, Bian H, Yong Q. Procuring the nano-scale lignin in prehydrolyzate as ingredient to prepare cellulose nanofibril composite film with multiple functions. Cellulose. 2020;27:9355–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure & Appl Chem. 1987;59:257–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tomaszewski JE, Schwarzenbach RP, Sander M. Protein encapsulation by humic substances. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:6003–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sander M, Tomaszewski JE, Madliger M, Schwarzenbach RP. Adsorption of insecticidal Cry1Ab protein to humic substances. 1. Experimental approach and mechanistic aspects. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:9923–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Koopal LK, Goloub TP, Davis TA. Binding of ionic surfactants to purified humic acid. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;275:360–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ishiguro M, Tan W, Koopal LK. Binding of cationic surfactants to humic substances. Colloids Surf, A. 2007;306:29–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Merdy P, Koopal LK, Huclier S. Modeling metal–particle interactions with an emphasis on natural organic matter. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:7459–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Stern JC, Foustoukos DI, Sonke JE, Salters VJM. Humic acid complexation of Th, Hf and Zr in ligand competition experiments: Metal loading and pH effects. Chem Geol. 2014;363:241–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lou H, Chen X, Liu L, Zhang M, Li L, Tian A. Theoretical researches on the charge transport properties of humic acid coordinating with Fe3+\Cu2+\Al3+ metal Ions. Chinese J Struct Chem. 2019;38:439–47.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Vermeer AWP, Riemsdijk WHV, Koopal LK. Metal ion adsorption to complexes of humic acid and metal oxides: deviations from the additivity rule. Environ Sci Technol. 1999;33:3892–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Satyanarayana S, Dabrowiak JC, Chaires JB. Tris (phenanthroline) ruthenium (II) enantiomer interactions with DNA: mode and specificity of binding. Biochemistry. 1993;32:2573–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chen Y, Schnitzer M. Viscosity measurements on soil humic substances. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1976;40:866–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ghosh K, Schnitzer M. Macromolecular structures of humic substances. Soil Sci. 1980;129:266–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Avena MJ, Vermeer AWP, Koopal LK. Volume and structure of humic acids studied by viscometry pH and electrolyte concentration effects. Colloids Surf, A. 1999;151:213–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dos Santos AP, Levin Y. Ion specificity and the theory of stability of colloidal suspensions. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:167801.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Luo Y, Li H, Gao X, Tian R. Description of colloidal particles aggregation in the presence of Hofmeister effects: on the relationship between ion adsorption energy and particle aggregation activation energy. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:22831–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pathak PN, Choppin GR. Sorption of Am 3+ cations on suspended silicate: Effects of pH, ionic strength, complexing anions, humic acid and metal ions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2007;274:517–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Roletto E, Ottino P. Analytical characterization of humic substances from composted lignocellulosic residues. Agricultural Wastes. 1984;11:181–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Huang C, Zheng Y, Lin W, Shi Y, Huang G, Yong Q. Removal of fermentation inhibitors from pre-hydrolysis liquor using polystyrene divinylbenzene resin. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13:188.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. laboratory analytical procedure. 2008;NREL.

  49. 49.

    Nakajima H, Wada Y. Dynamic viscosity of dilute solutions of poly( L-glutamic acid). J Polymer Sci. 1974;12:795–807.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870569). The authors thank the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD) for supporting the work.

Funding

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870569).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WT developed the idea for the study, performed the research, data analysis and prepared the manuscript. XW helped to analyze the content of humic acid in AWWS. CH and ZL helped to analyze data. CH, ZL, CL, and QY helped to revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Yong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, W., Wu, X., Huang, C. et al. Comprehensive understanding of the effects of metallic cations on enzymatic hydrolysis of humic acid-pretreated waste wheat straw. Biotechnol Biofuels 14, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01874-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Humic acids
  • Metallic cations
  • Cellulase
  • Enzymatic hydrolysis