Adam B, Le Feuvre P. Technology roadmap delivering sustainable bioenergy. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2017.
Wang Z, Dunn JB, Han J, Wang MQ. Influence of corn oil recovery on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol and corn oil biodiesel. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:178.
Guo M, Li C, Facciotto G, Bergante S, Bhatia R, Comolli R, et al. Bioethanol from poplar clone Imola: an environmentally viable alternative to fossil fuel? Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:134.
US EPA. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions; 2018. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions. Accessed 9 Feb 2019.
US EPA. Overview for Renewable Fuel Standard; 2019. https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program/overview-renewable-fuel-standard. Accessed 7 Feb 2019
Nie Y, Bi X. Life-cycle assessment of transportation biofuels from hydrothermal liquefaction of forest residues in British Columbia. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:23.
Iglesias L, Laca A, Herrero M, Díaz M. A life cycle assessment comparison between centralized and decentralized biodiesel production from raw sunflower oil and waste cooking oils. J Clean Prod. 2012;37:162–71.
Hiloidhari M, Baruah DC, Singh A, Kataki S, Medhi K, Kumari S, et al. Emerging role of Geographical Information System (GIS), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and spatial LCA (GIS-LCA) in sustainable bioenergy planning. Biores Technol. 2017;242:218–26.
Zhang Y, Hu G, Brown RC. Life cycle assessment of the production of hydrogen and transportation fuels from corn stover via fast pyrolysis. Environ Res Lett. 2013;8:025001.
Iribarren D, Peters JF, Dufour J. Life cycle assessment of transportation fuels from biomass pyrolysis. Fuel. 2012;97:812–21.
Akgul O, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG. An optimisation framework for a hybrid first/second generation bioethanol supply chain. Comput Chem Eng. 2012;42:101–14.
Wang C, Jin H, Peng P, Chen J. Thermodynamics and LCA analysis of biomass supercritical water gasification system using external recycle of liquid residual. Renew Energy. 2019;141:1117–26.
Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M. Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Prog. 2006;22:1012–24.
Lardon L, Hélias A, Sialve B, Steyer JP, Bernard O. Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:6475–81.
Hays TG. The Application of Geographic Information Systems in an Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Bioethanol Production System. Master’s Thesis. Raleigh, NC, USA: North Carolina State University; 2016.
Shirvani T, Yan X, Inderwildi OR, Edwards PP, King DA. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis for algae-derived biodiesel. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4:3773–8.
Janssen M, Xiros C, Tillman AM. Life cycle impacts of ethanol production from spruce wood chips under high-gravity conditions. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:53.
Wiloso EI, Heijungs R, De Snoo GR. LCA of second generation bioethanol: a review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice. Renew Sustain Energy Revs. 2012;16:5295–308.
Pierobon F, Eastin IL, Ganguly I. Life cycle assessment of residual lignocellulosic biomass-based jet fuel with activated carbon and lignosulfonate as co-products. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:139.
Roostaei J, Zhang Y. Spatially explicit life cycle assessment: opportunities and challenges of wastewater-based algal biofuels in the United States. Algal Res. 2017;24:395–402.
Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S. Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conserv Recy. 2009;53:434–47.
Ou X, Zhang X, Chang S, Guo Q. Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in (the) People’s Republic of China. Appl Energy. 2009;86:S197-208.
Rocha MH, Capaz RS, Lora EE, Nogueira LAH, Leme MM, Renó ML, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) for biofuels in Brazilian conditions: a meta-analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Revs. 2014;37:435–59.
Sanz Requena JF, Guimaraes AC, Quirós Alpera S, Relea Gangas E, Hernandez-Navarro S, Navas Gracia LM, et al. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the biofuel production process from sunflower oil, rapeseed oil and soybean oil. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92:190–9.
Han J, Elgowainy A, Dunn JB, Wang MQ. Life cycle analysis of fuel production from fast pyrolysis of biomass. Bioresource Technol. 2013;133:421–8.
Hsu DD. Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel produced via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012;45:41–7.
Graham RG, Bergougnoum MA, Overend RP. Fast pyrolysis of biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1984;6:95–135.
Dang Q, Yu C, Luo Z. Environmental life cycle assessment of bio-fuel production via fast pyrolysis of corn stover and hydroprocessing. Fuel. 2014;131:36–42.
Shen D, Jin W, Hu J, Xiao R, Luo K. An overview on fast pyrolysis of the main constituents in lignocellulosic biomass to valued-added chemicals: structures, pathways and interactions. Renew Sustain Energy Revs. 2015;51:761–74.
Zaimes GG, Soratana K, Harden CL, Landis AE, Khanna V. Biofuels via fast pyrolysis of perennial grasses: a life cycle evaluation of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:10007–18.
Fan J, Kalnes TN, Alward M, Klinger J, Sadehvandi A, Shonnard DR. Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil. Renew Energy. 2011;36:632–41.
Jones S, Meyer P, Snowden-Swan L, Padmaperuma A, Tan E, Dutta A, et al. Process design and economics for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrocarbon fuels: Fast pyrolysis and hydrotreating bio-oil pathway. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA; 2013. https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-23053.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2019.
Dutta A, Sahir A, Tan E, Humbird D, Snowden-swan LJ, Meyer P, et al. Process design and economics for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrocarbon fuels thermochemical research pathways with in situ and ex situ upgrading of fast pyrolysis vapors. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA; 2015. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/62455.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2019.
Perlack RD, Eaton LM, Turhollow AFJ, Langholtz MH, Brandt CC, Downing ME, et al. U.S. Billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; 2011. https://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/Pub31057.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2019.
Lan K, Ou L, Park S, Kelley SS, Yao Y. Life cycle analysis of decentralized preprocessing systems for fast pyrolysis biorefineries with blended feedstocks in the southeastern United States. Energy Technol. 2019;8:1900850.
Riffell S, Verschuyl J, Miller D, Wigley TB. Biofuel harvests, coarse woody debris, and biodiversity—a meta-analysis. Forest Ecol Manag. 2011;261:878–87.
Kenney KL, Cafferty KG, Jacobson JJ, Bonner IJ, Gresham G, Hess JR, et al. Feedstock supply system design and economics for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrocarbon fuels conversion pathway: fast pyrolysis and hydrotreating bio-oil pathway “The 2017 Design Case”. Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, USA; 2014. https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/6038147.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2019.
Sahoo K, Bilek E, Bergman R, Mani S. Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems. Appl Energy. 2019;235:578–90.
Han HS, Jacobson A, Bilek EM, Sessions J. Waste to wisdom: utilizing forest residues for the production of bioenergy and biobased products. Appl Eng Agric. 2018;34:5–10.
Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, Strømman AH, Hertwich E. CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy : atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy. 2011;3:413–26.
Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Deschěnes L, Samson R. Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environ Sci Tech. 2010;44:3169–74.
Albers A, Collet P, Lorne D, Benoist A, Hélias A. Coupling partial-equilibrium and dynamic biogenic carbon models to assess future transport scenarios in France. Appl Energy. 2019;239:316–30.
Joos F, Bruno M. Pulse response functions are cost-efficient tools to model the link between carbon emissions, atmospheric CO2 and global warming. Phys Chem Earth. 1997;21:471–6.
Faraca G, Tonini D, Astrup TF. Dynamic accounting of greenhouse gas emissions from cascading utilisation of wood waste. Sci Total Environ. 2019;651:2689–700.
Yang J, Chen B. Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project-A dynamic LCA perspective. Appl Energy. 2014;122:269–79.
Daystar J, Venditti R, Kelley SS. Dynamic greenhouse gas accounting for cellulosic biofuels: implications of time based methodology decisions. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2017;22:812–26.
Bright RM, Cherubini F, Strømman AH. Climate impacts of bioenergy: inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2012;37:2–11.
Sterman JD, Siegel L, Rooney-Varga JN. Does replacing coal with wood lower CO 2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy. Environ Res Lett. 2018;13:015007.
Jonker JGG, Junginger M, Faaij A. Carbon payback period and carbon offset parity point of wood pellet production in the South-eastern United States. GCB Bioenergy. 2014;4:371–89.
Ter-Mikaelian MT, Colombo SJ, Chen J. The burning question: does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions? A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon accounting. J Forest. 2014;113:57–68.
Rolls W, Forster PM. Quantifying forest growth uncertainty on carbon payback times in a simple biomass carbon model. Environ Res Commun. 2020;2:045001.
Nabuurs GJ, Arets EJMM, Schelhaas MJ. European forests show no carbon debt, only a long parity effect. For Policy Econ. 2017;75:120–5.
Pingoud K, Ekholm T, Savolainen I. Global warming potential factors and warming payback time as climate indicators of forest biomass use. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2012;17:369–86.
Lippke B, Oneil E, Harrison R, Skog K, Gustavsson L, Sathre R. Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns. Carbon Manag. 2011;2:303–33.
Helin T, Sokka L, Soimakallio S, Pingoud K, Pajula T. Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment–a review. GCB Bioenergy. 2013;5:475–86.
Amateis RL, Burkhart HE, Lee Allen H, Montes C. FASTLOB (A Stand-Level Growth and Yield Model for Fertilized and Thinned Loblolly Pine Plantations); 2001. https://fmrc.frec.vt.edu/content/dam/fmrc_frec_vt_edu/documents/fastlob.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2020.
The greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in technologies (GREET) model. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA; 2019.
Ou L, Cai H. Dynamic life-cycle analysis of fast pyrolysis biorefineries: impacts of feedstock moisture content and particle size. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8:6211–21.
Liao M, Kelley S, Yao Y. Generating energy and greenhouse gas inventory data of activated carbon production using machine learning and kinetic based process simulation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8:1252–61.
Lan K, Park S, Kelley SS, English BC, Yu TE, Larson J, et al. Impacts of uncertain feedstock quality on the economic feasibility of fast pyrolysis biorefineries with blended feedstocks and decentralized preprocessing sites in the southeastern United States. GCB Bioenergy. 2020;12:1014–29.
Han J, Canter CE, Cai H, Wang M, Qin Z, Dunn JB. Carbon dynamics for biofuels produced from woody feedstocks. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL USA; 2018. https://greet.es.anl.gov/publication-woody_lca. Accessed 11 Jan 2020.
ISO: ISO 14040:2006, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment—principles and framework; 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2020.
Smith JE, Heath LS, Skog KE, Birdsey RA. Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, USA; 2006. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/22954. Accessed 11 Apr 2020.
Markewitz D. Fossil fuel carbon emissions from silviculture: impacts on net carbon sequestration in forests. Forest Ecol Manag. 2006;236:153–61.
Amateis RL, Liu J, Ducey MJ, Lee AH. Modeling response to midrotation nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization in loblolly pine plantations. South J Appl Forestry. 2000;24:207–12.
Verschuyl J, Riffell S, Miller D, Wigley TB. Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests—a meta-analysis. Forest Ecol Manag. 2011;261:221–32.
Dickens ED, Moorhead DJ. A guide to thinning pine plantations. University of Georgia; 2015. https://bugwoodcloud.org/bugwood/productivity/pdfs/Guide_thinning_pine_plantations.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2020.
Nebeker TE, Hodges JD, Karr BK, Moehring DM. Thinning practices in southern pines-with pest management recommendations. USDA Forest Service; 1985. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/156818/2/tb1703.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2019.
Mann WF, Lohrey RE. Precommercial thinning of southern pines. J Forest. 1974;72:557–60.
Blakeslee GM, Jokela EJ, Hollis CH, Wilson DS, Lante WD, Allen JE. Pitch canker in young loblolly pines: influence of precommercial thinning and fertilization on disease incidence and severity. South J Appl Forestry. 1999;23:139–43.
Watson AC, Sullivan J, Amacher GS, Asaro C. Cost sharing for pre-commercial thinning in southern pine plantations: willingness to participate in Virginia’s pine bark beetle prevention program. Forest Policy Econ. 2013;34:65–72.
Edmunds CW, Reyes Molina EA, André N, Hamilton C, Park S, Fasina O, et al. Blended feedstocks for thermochemical conversion: biomass characterization and bio-oil production from switchgrass-pine residues blends. Front Energy Res. 2018;6:79.
Gallagher TV, Kantavichai R, Teeter LD. An economic analysis of incorporating biomass thinning into loblolly pine plantations in Alabama. Open J Forestry. 2017;7:172–87.
Mederski P, Venanzi R, Bembenek M, Karaszewski Z, Rosińska M, Pilarek Z, et al. Designing thinning operations in 2nd age class pine stands—economic and environmental implications. Forests. 2018;9:335.
Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA. National-scale biomass estimators for united states tree species. Forest Sci. 2003;49:12–35.
Langholtz MH, Stokes BJ, Eaton LM. 2016 Billion-ton report: advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy, vol 1: economic availability of feedstocks. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA; 2016. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/12/f34/2016_billion_ton_report_12.2.16.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2020.
Fritts SR, Moorman CE, Hazel DW, Jackson BD. Biomass Harvesting Guidelines affect downed woody debris retention. Biomass Bioenerg. 2014;70:382–91.
Lan K, Kelley SS, Nepal P, Yao Y. Dynamic life cycle carbon and energy analysis for cross-laminated timber in the Southeastern United States. Environ Res Lett. 2020;15(12):124036.
Wang M, Han J, Dunn JB, Cai H. Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use. Environ Res Lett. 2012;7:045905.
Daystar J, Reeb C, Gonzalez R, Venditti R, Kelley SS. Environmental life cycle impacts of cellulosic ethanol in the Southern U.S. produced from loblolly pine, eucalyptus, unmanaged hardwoods, forest residues, and switchgrass using a thermochemical conversion pathway. Fuel Processing Technol. 2015;138:164–74.
ISO. ISO 14041: 1998 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis; 1998. https://www.iso.org/standard/23152.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2020.
Dwivedi P, Alavalapati JR, Susaeta A, Stainback A. Impact of carbon value on the profitability of slash pine plantations in the southern United States: an integrated life cycle and Faustmann analysis. Can J Forest Res. 2009;39:990–1000.
Oneil EE, Johnson LR, Lippke BR, McCarter JB, McDill ME, Roth PA, et al. Life-cycle impacts of inland Northwest and Northeast/North central forest resources. Wood Fiber Sci. 2010;42:29–51.
Kilpeläinen A, Alam A, Strandman H, Kellomäki S. Life cycle assessment tool for estimating net CO2 exchange of forest production. GCB Bioenergy. 2011;3:461–71.
Johnson L, Lippke B, Oneil E. Modeling biomass collection and woods processing life-cycle analysis. Forest Product J. 2012;62:258–72.
Karjalainen T. Greenhouse gas emissions from the use of primary energy in forest operations and long-distance transportation of timber in Finland. Forestry. 1996;69:215–28.
Lindholm E. Energy Use and Environmental Impact of Roundwood and Forest Fuel Production in Sweden. Dissertation. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Energy; 2010.
Alam A, Kilpeläinen A, Kellomäki S. Impacts of initial stand density and thinning regimes on energy wood production and management-related CO2 emissions in boreal ecosystems. Eur J Forest Res. 2012;131:655–67.
Whittaker C, Mortimer N, Murphy R, Matthews R. Energy and greenhouse gas balance of the use of forest residues for bioenergy production in the UK. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35:4581–94.
González-García S, Berg S, Feijoo G, Moreira MT. Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood: Spanish and Swedish case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2009;14:340–53.
Karjalainen T, Kellomäki S, Pussinen A. Role of wood-based products in absorbing atmospheric carbon. Silva Fennica. 1994;28:67–80.
Klvac R, Skoupy A. Characteristic fuel consumption and exhaust emissions in fully mechanized logging operations. J Forest Res. 2009;14:328–34.
Athanassiadis D, Lidestav G, Wästerlund I. Fuel, hydraulic oil and lubricant consumption in Swedish mechanized harvesting operations, 1996. J Forest Eng. 1999;10:59–66.
Saud P, Wang J, Lin W, Sharma BD, Hartley DS. A life cycle analysis of forest carbon balance and carbon emissions of timber harvesting in West Virginia. Wood Fiber Sci. 2013;45:250–67.
McNamee P, Adams PW, McManus MC, Dooley B, Darvell LI, Williams A, et al. An assessment of the torrefaction of North American pine and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;113:177–88.
McEwan A, Brink M, Spinelli R. Efficiency of different machine layouts for chain flail delimbing. Debarking Chipping For. 2019;10:126.
Schultz RP. Loblolly pine: the ecology and culture of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). USDA Forest Service, Washington D.C., USA; 1997. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/734. Accessed 11 Apr 2020.
Patterson DW, Doruska PF, Posey T. Weight and bulk density of loblolly pine plywood logs in southeast Arkansas. Forest Prod J. 2004;54:145–9.
Patterson HT, Clark AI. Bulk density of southern pine logs. Forest Prod J. 1988;38:36–40.
MacFarlane DW, Green EJ, Burkhart HE. Population density influences assessment and application of site index. Can J Forest Res. 2000;30:1472-5.90.
Doolittle WT. Site index comparisons for several forest species in the southern Appalachians. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1958;22:455–8.
Hudak AT, Crookston NL, Evans JS, Falkowski MJ, Smith AM, Gessler PE, et al. Regression modeling and mapping of coniferous forest basal area and tree density from discrete-return lidar and multispectral satellite data. Can J Remote Sens. 2006;32:126–38.
Cunningham K, Barry JE, Walkingstick T. Managing Loblolly Pine Stands—from A to Z. University of Arkansas. 2008. https://www.uaex.edu/publications/PDF/FSA-5023.pdf. Accessed 19 Jun 2019.
Moorhead DJ, Dickens ED. Fertilizing pine plantations: a county Agent’s guide for making fertilization recommendations. University of Georgia; 2002. https://bugwoodcloud.org/resource/files/14828.pdf. Accessed 19 Jun 2019.
Ou L, Kim H, Kelley S, Park S. Impacts of feedstock properties on the process economics of fast-pyrolysis biorefineries. Biofuel Bioprod Bior. 2018;12:442–52.
Ringer M, Putsche V, Scahill J. Large-scale pyrolysis oil production: a technology assessment and economic analysis. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA; 2006. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/37779.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2019.
Bridgwater AV, Czernik S, Piskorz J. An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Org Geochem. 1999;30:1479–93.
Bridgwater AV, Peacocke GVC. Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Revs. 2000;4:1–73.
de la Rosa JM, Rosado M, Paneque M, Miller AZ, Knicker H. Effects of aging under field conditions on biochar structure and composition: implications for biochar stability in soils. Sci Total Environ. 2018;613–614:969–76.
Mchenry MP. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: certainty, uncertainty and risk. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2009;129:1–7.
Lehmann J, Joseph S, editors. Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. New York: Routledge; 2015.
IPCC. 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Buendia EC, Tanabe K, Kranjc A, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M, Ngarize S, et al, eds. Switzerland: IPCC; 2019. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/12/19R_V0_01_Overview.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2021.
Kim S, Dale BE, Jin M, Thelen KD, Zhang X, Meier P, et al. Integration in a depot-based decentralized biorefinery system: corn stover-based cellulosic biofuel. GCB Bioenergy. 2019;11:871–82.
Winjobi O, Zhou W, Kulas D, Nowicki J, Shonnard DR. Production of hydrocarbon fuel using two-step torrefaction and fast pyrolysis of pine. Part 2: life-cycle carbon footprint. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5:4541–51.
ISO. ISO 14044: 2006 Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines; 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2020.
IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, et al., editors. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2007.