Skip to content

Advertisement

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Open Access

In situ label-free imaging of hemicellulose in plant cell walls using stimulated Raman scattering microscopy

Biotechnology for Biofuels20169:256

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0669-9

Received: 10 August 2016

Accepted: 15 November 2016

Published: 22 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Plant hemicellulose (largely xylan) is an excellent feedstock for renewable energy production and second only to cellulose in abundance. Beyond a source of fermentable sugars, xylan constitutes a critical polymer in the plant cell wall, where its precise role in wall assembly, maturation, and deconstruction remains primarily hypothetical. Effective detection of xylan, particularly by in situ imaging of xylan in the presence of other biopolymers, would provide critical information for tackling the challenges of understanding the assembly and enhancing the liberation of xylan from plant materials.

Results

Raman-based imaging techniques, especially the highly sensitive stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy, have proven to be valuable tools for label-free imaging. However, due to the complex nature of plant materials, especially those same chemical groups shared between xylan and cellulose, the utility of specific Raman vibrational modes that are unique to xylan have been debated. Here, we report a novel approach based on combining spectroscopic analysis and chemical/enzymatic xylan removal from corn stover cell walls, to make progress in meeting this analytical challenge. We have identified several Raman peaks associated with xylan content in cell walls for label-free in situ imaging xylan in plant cell wall.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that xylan can be resolved from cellulose and lignin in situ using enzymatic digestion and label-free SRS microscopy in both 2D and 3D. We believe that this novel approach can be used to map xylan in plant cell walls and that this ability will enhance our understanding of the role played by xylan in cell wall biosynthesis and deconstruction.

Keywords

HemicelluloseXylanXylanaseLabel-free imagingRaman SpectroscopyStimulated Raman Scattering (SRS)Microscopy

Background

Hemicellulose plays a critical role in plant cell wall assembly, maturation, and deconstruction, particularly in grass and secondary walls of woody plants. As an important resource biopolymer, xylan is widely available from various sources, such as energy crop biomass, where it represents 22% of corn stover and other grass agriculture residues [1]; and can be relatively easily extracted [2]. In the search for more efficient strategies to convert biomass to fuels and high-value chemicals, xylan represents unique challenges and opportunities. In the process of conversion of biomass to drop-in biofuels, xylan is both a significant sugar source for biofuels fermentation and yet, also a factor contributing to biomass recalcitrance. The fermentation of xylan also produces xylitol, a low-caloric sweetener and an agent against dental caries with huge marketability in the food industry and with clinical applications [3]. Xylo-oligosaccharides derived from xylan are widely used in food and health products as bioactive ingredients [410]. With proper cross-linking chemistries, xylan can form porous forms and gels [11]. The bio-derived and biocompatible foamy materials derived from xylan also have key roles in numerous non-fuel market sectors, including cosmetics, drug delivery, tissue engineering, insulation, and gas storage [12]. Sugar-based non-ionic surfactants produced from xylan have also attracted growing attention due to their biodegradability and excellent foaming properties [13]. With the advent of engineered biomaterials, such as cellulose nano-fibers, cellulose nanocrystals, chitosans, and polyvinyl alcohol polymers, xylan can be considered another polymer suitable for renewable and biodegradable films that are more economical than those made from oil-based polymers [14]. Because of numerous applications for xylan, extensive research has been conducted to develop chemical and biological approaches to effectively separate xylan from the rest of lignocellulose with high sugar yields. In the past, attempts have also been made to in situ modify the xylan in the plant cell wall to produce xylan derivatives [1517]. Effective detection of xylan, particularly in situ imaging of xylan in the presence of other biopolymers, would provide new tools to study the assembly and liberation of xylan from plant materials.

Wet laboratory methodologies have been used in the past to provide accurate qualitative and quantitative measurements of carbohydrates. Depending on the nature of the samples under study, these analyses may involve specialized sample preparation steps to extract, hydrolyze, and remove moisture before chromatographic and/or spectroscopic analysis. Therefore, fast and non-destructive analytical techniques are needed. Infrared spectroscopy has been used to estimate the concentration of methoxyl and acetyl groups on xylan [18] and has been applied to corn stover, poplar, and spruce samples to analyze changes that are caused by various thermal chemical pretreatments [19, 20]. Near infrared spectroscopy combined with multivariate analytical statistical methods has also been used to assess the chemical composition of corn stover and switchgrass [21, 22] wood [23] and Kraft pulps [24]. In the past, we have also applied non-linear Raman microscopic techniques, such as coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopies, to obtain high-resolution (~300 nm), chemically specific, and non-destructive imaging information regarding the distribution of important chemical compositions in the plant cell wall [2529]. While the non-linear Raman techniques rely on the Raman activity of a specific chemical group, they provide signal intensity of orders of magnitude higher than spontaneous Raman microscopy, offering much faster imaging acquisition rates [26].

Raman spectra of plant cell walls contain the vibrational modes primarily from three major wall components: lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose (mostly xylan). Besides some relatively weak peaks, lignin’s primary Raman contribution is located around 1600 cm−1. Cellulose has broad Raman contributions; however, the peaks around 1100 cm−1 are widely considered as the unique Raman peak for cellulose. In the past, 1100 and 1600 cm−1 have been chosen by most of the Raman imaging efforts to in situ map cellulose and lignin in plant cell walls [26, 3033]. Conversely, in situ mapping of xylan using Raman imaging is not common. One key challenge is that xylan and cellulose have similar chemical groups. Cellulose is a linear homopolymer consisting of glucose residues linked together by β-1,4-glycosidic bonds. Due to the inter- and intra-chain hydrogen bonds, the structure of cellulose is highly ordered. There have been six different crystalline forms of cellulose reported: cellulose I, II, IIII, IIIII, IVI, and IVII. Cellulose I and II are found in nature and the other allomorphs can be obtained by chemical or physical treatments [34]. Cellulose I is the main form of cellulose consisting of two allomorphs: cellulose Iα and Iβ, which differ by the hydrogen patterns (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The inter-chain hydrogen bond O6-H–O3 is dominant in cellulose I, whereas in cellulose II, the O6-H–O2 is dominant. In cellulose I and II, the O3-H–O5 intra-chain hydrogen bonds make each cellulose chain rigid and linear in shape. In contrast, xylan in the plant cell wall has a variety of side chains attached to the linear β-1,4-xylopyranose backbone, forming an amorphous structure [35] (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Besides the difference in the chemical composition of the backbone sugar units and the sidechains, cellulose and xylan have dramatically different organizations of chemical backbones, which could affect their Raman spectra. It has already been discovered that a Raman peak in the spectrum may contain contribution not only from a single chemical group, but from a composite of several interacting vibrational motions involving multiple sites in the molecule [36, 37]. A good example of this case is the Raman spectra from cellulose I and II: although they have exactly the same chemical groups and bonding, their different cellulose chain organizations lead to two different spectra [38].

Over the past few years, extensive effort has been devoted to distinguish Raman contributions of xylan from the rest of cell wall components; however, the results varied depending on the materials chosen for study and the separation methods used to extract the samples [39, 40]. By using extracted hemicelluloses from woody materials, hemicellulose was found to contribute broadly to the Raman spectrum, which made hemicellulose difficult to distinguish by Raman alone [39]. A combination of principle component analysis and multivariate curve resolution applied to the Raman spectroscopy of isolated cell wall polysaccharides suggested that the Raman peaks from hemicellulose overlapped with those of cellulose. However, in the cell wall, this result might be also explained by the possibility that hemicellulose is distributed homogenously with cellulose [41]. In flax fibers, it was suggested that the weak Raman peaks at 800–870 and 475–515 cm−1 can potentially be used to identify xylan [42]. Chu et al. reported that in Miscanthus the weak Raman peak at 478 cm−1 was related to the HCC and HCO bending of the C6 group in hemicellulose [43].

Due to the complex nature of the biomass substrate, separation of xylan from the rest of cell wall components seems to be inevitable for accurate xylan quantification. However, common chemical approaches create broad impacts for all the cell wall components. Here, we report an approach to use xylanases to specifically digest large portions of xylan in a carefully pretreated corn stover substrate. No detectable lignin or cellulose was digested by the assay. This approach allowed us to produce a series of artificial xylan “concentration ladders” in corn stover substrates. By comparing the Raman spectra from xylan model compounds obtained from different sources and with different degrees of polymerization, we determined several Raman bands that are sensitive to xylan and demonstrated that xylan in corn stover cell walls can be imaged at surprising detail.

Results and discussion

Raman spectral analysis reveals potential xylan-specific bands

Figure 1 (top row) shows the Raman spectrum from the undigested deacetylated corn stover control containing 31% of xylan, as well as cellulose and lignin (Table 1). After xylanase digestion, 55% of the cell wall xylan was removed (the resulting Raman spectrum is also shown in Fig. 1). The Raman spectra from the xylan model compounds obtained from various sources, with more than 68% xylan content (Table 1), are also listed in Fig. 1 for comparison. Those xylan model compounds have a wide range of degrees of polymerization (DP) from d-xylose monomer to short oligomers with DP 2-7; as well as extracted xylan polymers with DP100–200.
Fig. 1

Comparison of normalized Raman spectra. a Deacetylated corn stover (control). b Deacetylated corn stover with 55% cell wall xylan removed by xylanases. c Oat spelts xylan. d Birchwood xylan. e Xylo-oligomer (DP ranging from 2–7). f d-xylose

Table 1

Chemical compositional analysis (Wt%) of deacetylated corn stover control and extracted xylan models

Sample

Glucan %

Xylan %

Lignin %

Galactan %

Arabinan %

Fructan %

Mannan %

Acetate %

Total %

Deacetylated corn stover

45 ± 3

31 ± 2

13 ± 2

1.8 ± 0.5

1.7 ± 0.5

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

0.2 ± 0.1

93

Deacetylated corn stover with 55% cell wall xylan removed by xylanases

66 ± 4

12 ± 2

18 ± 2

1.0 ± 0.2

1.0 ± 0.2

0.3 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

0.1 ± 0.1

98

Xylo-oligo DP2-7

12 ± 2

73 ± 4

5 ± 2

3.4 ± 0.5

3.1 ± 0.5

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

1.6 ± 0.5

98

Oat spelts xylan

6 ± 1

68 ± 4

3 ± 1

1.0 ± 0.2

6 ± 1

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

5 ± 1

89

Birchwood xylan

1 ± 1

80 ± 5

2 ± 1

0.3 ± 0.1

0.5 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

0.00 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1

84

Oat spelts and birchwood xylan samples also contain 3–4% and 10–12% glucuronic acid

Starting from the low frequency end, previous normal coordinate calculations revealed that the 250–600 cm−1 Raman region mainly contains the vibrational contributions from the skeleton bending involving CCC, COC, OCC, and OCO [44]. There are also small contributions from methine bending (CCH and OCH) and skeletal stretching (CC and CO) in this region [44]. Previous Raman spectroscopy studies of Valonia and Ramie cellulose found that the 320, 355, and 380 cm−1 peaks are associated with heavy atom bending [36, 44]. A Raman microscopy investigation of the tomato cell wall suggested that the 380 cm−1 peak belongs to δ(CCC) ring vibration from the cellulose [41]. Polarization Raman spectroscopy of the orientation of the chemical groups of cellulose indicated that the 320 cm−1 peak is associated with δ(CCC) ring vibration motions that are parallel to the cellulose chain axis [32], and that the 355 and 380 cm−1 peaks contain vibration motions both parallel and perpendicular to the cellulose chain axis [36, 37]. In the present study, after about 55% of cell wall xylan was hydrolyzed by enzymes, the 320, 355, and 380 cm−1 peaks showed very small changes. This observation indicates these three peaks are likely not directly linked to xylanase accessible xylan.

The 424, 492, and 563 cm−1 peaks appear in the deacetylated corn stover, the deacetylated corn stover following 55% xylan removal and the xylan model compounds. The 424 cm−1 peak was previously reported as δ(CCC) and δ(CCO) ring deformation in cellulose [38]. The 492 cm−1 peak is from cellulose glycosidic ν(COC) vibration [32, 42]. The 563 cm−1 peak was previously assigned to the cellulose δ(COC) ring vibration [38]. It seems, therefore, that the vibrations for 424, 492, and 563 cm−1 peaks could also exist in xylan. In fact, the Raman spectrum of the deacetylated corn stover sample with 55% xylan removed shows that these peaks are only slightly affected by xylanase digestion, indicating that they do contain some contribution from xylan. The 424, 492, and 563 cm−1 peaks also appear in the xylo-oligomers DP2-7, in which the 424 cm−1 and the 563 cm−1 peaks shift slightly to lower frequencies. In d-xylose, the 492 cm−1 glycosidic ν(COC) disappears, due to lack of any glycosidic bond and the 424 cm−1 ring deformation appears to degenerate into two peaks: the 407 cm−1 peak (ring bend coupled with OH bend) and the 433 cm−1 peak (ring deformation) [45]. It seems that in biomass, both cellulose and xylan contribute to the 424, 492, and 563 cm−1 bands. Enzymatic digestion of xylan alone from cell walls, therefore, should affect their peak intensity slightly.

The 678, 770, and 840 cm−1 peaks appear in the deacetylated corn stover control, the deacetylated corn stover sample with 55% xylan removed, oat spelts xylan, and birchwood xylan. Previously, it was reported that the 678 cm−1 peak was due to the low-frequency vibrations of the pyranoid rings [46]. In deacetylated corn stovers (Fig. 1a, b), the 770 cm−1 peak could be related to xyloglucan [47], and possibly some contribution from lignin aromatic rings, their substituent groups and side chains [39, 48] or ferulic acid attached to xylan. In oat spelts and birchwood (Fig. 1c, d), the 770 cm−1 band could be due to glucuronic acid group attached to xylan [49]. The Raman bands in the 830–900 cm−1 region have been related to the anomeric configuration of carbohydrates [46, 5052].

The broad peak centered at 920 and the 1007 cm−1 peak found in the deacetylated corn stover control also appear in all of the xylan model compounds. For example, in d-xylose, there is a very strong peak at 900 cm−1 (symmetric COC str coupled with CC ring str) and a weak side peak at 930 cm−1 (the CO and the CC stretch coupled with methine deformation) [45]. The 900 cm−1 peak remains strong in the xylooligmers (DP2-7). In the oat spelts xylan, birchwood xylan, and deacetylated corn stover samples, this peak could be slightly overlapped with the lignin peak at 920–930 cm−1 (lignin skeletal deformation of aromatic rings, substituent groups, side chains, and CCH wag) [53]. The cellulose COC symmetric stretch also contributes to the 900 cm−1 [32]. After xylan removal, the 920 cm−1 peak is significantly reduced. It seems that this peak is associated with xylan, possibly COC stretch coupled with CC ring stretch. The d-xylose also has a medium strong peak at 1015 cm−1 due to CC and CO ring stretch coupled with methine deformation [45]. All the other xylan model polymers show a peak around 1007 cm−1 due to the ν(C–C) and ν(C–OH) vibrations [40]. The 1007 cm−1 in deacetylated corn stover is significantly reduced when xylan is digested, indicating that it is associated with xylan, possibly via the ν(C–C) and ν(C–OH).

Both the 1095 and 1123 cm−1 peaks have traditionally been assigned to cellulose for its COC stretch and COC stretch plus ring breathing, respectively. It is known that xylan and glucomannan have a very small contribution to these peaks [39]. In the past, the 1095 and 1123 cm−1 peaks have been widely used to image cellulose content in the cell wall [25, 26, 3032, 54]. As shown in Fig. 1, both of the peaks showed little change after enzymatic digestion of the xylan, indicating that the enzyme has minimal impact on cellulose.

The 1219 cm−1 peak in the deacetylated corn stover control also shows up in all the xylan model compounds. In d-xylose, the 1219 cm−1 peak shifts to 1246 cm−1, which has been reported as the methine deformation coupled with OH in-plane bend in d-xylose [45]. In the xylo-oligomer (DP2-7), it appears as a similar peak around 1246 cm−1, possibly due to the C-O stretch, δ(CH) and/or δ(COH) in hemicellulose [39, 41, 5557]. Some acetyl groups present on hemicellulose were also believed to contribute to the 1250 cm−1 peak [57, 58]. The 1219 cm−1 peak is greatly affected when the cell wall xylan is solubilized by enzymes, confirming that this peak is closely related to xylan, possibly associated with the COH and CH groups of xylan.

The δ(CH) and δ(COH) vibrations of xylan contribute to the 1313 cm−1 found in the deacetylated corn stover control [39, 40]. Some studies have specifically assigned the 1313 cm−1 peak to the C3–OH vibration on xylan [40]. In d-xylose, the 1313 cm−1 peak is associated with anomeric methine deformation coupled with OH in-plane bend, and the 1340 cm−1 peak is associated with methine deformation coupled with methylene wag [45]. Besides xylan however, cellulose also contributes significantly to 1318-1335 cm−1 by ω(CH2), δ(HCC), δ(HCO), and δ(COH) vibrations [32, 38]. It has been reported that lignin also contributes in the region 1297–1334 cm−1, possibly due to its aliphatic O–H bend vibration [39, 48] or vibration modes from S lignin [33]. The 1313 cm−1 peak is only partially reduced when xylan is enzymatically digested, confirming that it has partial contribution from xylan. The 1383 cm−1 peak in xylan could be due to the δ(CH) and δ(OH) vibration which were previously recorded at 1376 cm−1 [40]. In the deacetylated corn stover, oat spelts xylan, and birchwood xylan samples studied, it is likely that the 1383 cm−1 peak is also partly overlapped with the lignin peaks 1363 cm−1 and 1393 cm−1 from the C–H bend in the R3C–H and the phenolic O–H bend in the lignin, respectively [39, 53]. Besides this, cellulose also contributes strongly to 1380 cm−1 with its δ(CH2), δ(HCC), δ(HCO), and δ(COH) vibrations [38, 39]. The 1383 cm−1 peak thus has little diagnostic value. The 1313 cm−1 peak is only partially affected by enzymatic xylan removal, indicating that it involves only partial Raman contributions from xylan.

The 1471 cm−1 peak was found in deacetylated corn stover samples and in all the xylan models including the monomer d-xylose. Previously, Raman studies on xylose have shown that the peak 1471 cm−1 is due to the OH in-plane bend coupled with the methine deformation (1455 cm−1) and the methylene scissors coupled with the wag vibration (1480 cm−1) [45]. In the Raman studies of black spruce, the 1471 cm−1 peak was also considered for xylan [39]. By comparing the Raman spectrum of deacetylated corn stover before and after enzymatic xylan removal, the 1471 cm−1 peak exhibits significant drop when the cell wall xylan content is solubilized, indicating that it is highly associated with xylan and possibly related to the OH and CH2 vibrations in xylan.

The two peaks at 1604 and 1634 cm−1 are the signature peaks known for lignin. Specifically, the 1604 cm−1 peak is due to the aromatic ring vibration, and the 1634 cm−1 is assigned to the C=C stretch in the coniferaldehyde unit of lignin [5962]. As shown in Fig. 1, both of the peaks showed little change after xylan digestion, indicating that the enzyme digestion has minimal impact on lignin.

Xylan-content cell wall ladder confirms xylan-specific Raman bands

In the above discussions (also summarized in Table 2), it was found that the Raman bands at 920, 1007, 1219, and 1471 cm−1 are sensitive to cell wall xylan. To verify their dependence on xylan content, a series of deacetylated corn stover cell wall samples with relative xylan contents ranging from 45 to 100% (100% for native cell wall xylan content) was created (Additional file 1: Table S1, S2). No lignin or cellulose solubilization was detected by compositional analysis (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Table 2

Summary of Raman bands assignments

Deacetylated corn stover

Xylan models

Control

After 55% xylan removal

Assignment

Species

Oat spelts xylan

Birchwood xylan

Xylo oligo DP2-7

Assignment

d-Xylose

Assignment in d-xylose

320w

320w

δ(CCC) ring

Cellulose

320w

320w

320m

   
        

330vw

OH bend coupled with CO def

355w

355w

δ(CCC) ring

Cellulose

355w

355w

355sh

 

 

380sh

380w

δ(CCC) ring

Cellulose

 

 
        

407s

Ring bend coupled with OH bend

424m

424m

δ(CCC) and δ(CCO) ring

Cellulose, xylan

424m

424m

415s

Xylan δ(CCC) and δ(CCO) ring

433s

CO deformation

492m

492m

Glycosidic ν(CCC)

Cellulose, xylan

492m

492m

492m

Xylan glycosidic ν(CCC)

 

530sh

   

530sh

530sh

530s

 

530s

CO deformation couple with ring bend

563m

563m

δ(COC) ring

Cellulose, xylan

563m

563s

570sh

Xylan δ(COC) ring

567m

CO def coupled with methine def

        

613m

CO def coupled with CO ring bend

678s

678sh

Pyranoid rings

 

678sh

678m

 

 

770s

770m

Xyloglucan, possibly some lignin ring and side chains

Xyloglucan lignin, ferulic acid

770m

770s

Glucuronic acid remainings

760s

CO ring str and bend coupled with CC ring str and CO str and bend

820–860s

820–860s

Glycosidic bonds and backbone vibration in hexose

 

820-860s

820-860s

 

 

920m

920sh

COC str coupled with CC ring str.

Xylan

920sh

920sh

900s

Xylan COC str coupled with CC ring str

907vs

Symmetric COC str coupled with CC ring str

        

930m

CO and CC stretch coupled with methine deformation

1007s

1007w

ν(C–C) and ν(C–OH)

Xylan

1007w

1007m

990m

Xylan ν(C–C) and ν(C–OH)

1019m

CC and CO ring str coupled with methine deformation

1095m

1095m

COC stretch symmetric

Cellulose

1095sh

1095sh

1095sh

 

1089s

CO str coupled with CC str and methine def

1123s

1123s

ν (COC), glycosidic; ring breathing, symmetric

Cellulose

1123m

1123m

1123m

 

1111s

CO str coupled with CC ring str

1219s

1219w

C-O str, δ(CH) and/or δ(COH)

Xylan

1219m

1219s

1250w

C–O str, δ(CH) and/or δ(COH)

1240m

Methine def coupled with OH i.p. bend

1313s

1313m

Cellulose aliphatic O–H bend vibration, xylan C3-OH

Cellulose, xylan

1313m

1313s

1315m

 

1313m

Anomeric methine def coupled with methine def

        

1340m

Methine def coupled with methylene wag

1383m

1383m

Cellulose δ(CH2), δ(HCC), δ(HCO) and δ(COH), lignin phenolic O–H, xylan δ(CH) and δ(OH)

Cellulose, lignin, xylan

1383m

1383m

1383s

Xylan δ(CH) and δ(OH)

1383m

Methylene wag coupled with OH i.p. bend and methine def

        

1395m

OH i.p. bend coupled methylene wag and methine def

1471s

1471w

Xylan OH and CH2

Xylan

1471w

1471m

1471s

Xylan OH and CH2

1471m

Methylene scissors coupled with wag

1604s

1604s

Lignin aromatic ring

Lignin

1604m

Residual lignin aromatic ring and coniferaldehyde

 

1634s

1634s

C=C stretch in coniferaldehyde lignin

Lignin

1634m

 

Conventional symbolism indicating relative intensity

vw very weak, w weak, m medium, s strong, vs very strong, sh shoulder

Figure 2 shows the comparison of the lignin-specific Raman band at 1600 cm−1 from the deacetylated corn stover cell wall samples with various xylan contents. The error bars in each spectrum show the standard deviation of hundreds of spectrum scans. All the spectra are normalized by the 1604 cm−1 peak for comparison (baseline leveled at 1520 cm−1). Although the xylan content varies significantly, the lignin peaks are almost identical in the range from 1520 to 1700 cm−1. The peak height of the 1634 cm−1 peak is almost identical for both the control and the enzyme-digested deacetylated corn stover. The peak ratio of 1604 to 1634 cm−1 (Fig. 2, inset), reflecting relative contributions from the aromatic ring vibration versus the C=C stretch in the coniferaldehyde unit of lignin, is constant for all the xylan concentrations. This implies that the ratio of coniferyl units and aromatic rings is constant.
Fig. 2

Comparison of lignin’s signature Raman peaks at 1604 and 1634 cm−1 in deacetylated corn stover cell walls with varying amounts of xylan content due to controlled xylanase digestion of xylan. The gray traces indicate the standard deviations. The two lignin signature Raman bands are unaltered even upon removal of significant amounts of cell wall xylan. The inset shows the peak ratio of 1604/1634 cm−1, which remains constant across wide ranges of xylan digestion. All spectrums are normalized

Figure 3 shows the comparison of cellulose-specific Raman bands from the deacetylated corn stover control and the cell wall samples with altered xylan contents. For comparison, these spectra are normalized by the lignin peak at 1604 cm−1. The two cellulose signature peaks, 1095  and 1123 cm−1, show similar shape for all the samples, albeit with significantly different xylan content (Fig. 3a). The peak heights of 1095 and 1123 cm−1 (baseline at 1050 cm−1) remain the same for the control and the enzyme-digested deacetylated corn stover cell wall (Fig. 3b, c). This result is an indication that the cellulose content in the cell wall is not affected by the xylanase treatments used for these samples.
Fig. 3

Comparison of cellulose’s signature Raman peaks at 1095 and 1123 cm−1 in deacetylated corn stover cell walls with varying amounts of xylan content due to controlled xylanase digestion of xylan. a Raman spectra show little change. b, c The peak heights of 1095 and 1123 cm−1 in cell walls remain constant with varying amounts of cell wall xylan content. All spectrums are normalized. The gray traces indicate the standard deviations

In contrast to the cellulose and lignin bands, the four xylan-sensitive bands at 920, 1007, 1219, and 1471 cm−1 exhibit a dramatic and consistent reduction for all four of the xylan-removed cell walls samples (Fig. 4). The changes in the spectra of the xylan-removed cell walls are significantly greater than experimental error, indicating that those Raman bands are indeed associated with xylan removal.
Fig. 4

Zoom-in comparisons of the xylan-specific Raman bands with varying amounts of xylan content due to controlled xylanase digestion of xylan. a 1471 cm−1 (xylan OH and CH2), b 1219 cm−1 (xylan C-O str, δ(CH), δ(COH)), c 1007 cm−1 (xylan ν(C–C) and ν(C–OH)) and d 920 cm−1 (xylan COC str coupled with CC ring str) in deacetylated corn stover cell wall with varying amounts of xylan content due to controlled xylanase digestion of xylan. The gray traces indicate the standard deviations. All spectrums are normalized

Xylan-specific Raman bands for in situ xylan imaging by SRS microscopy

The four xylan-specific Raman bands were also validated by SRS microscopy and tested for the possibility of in situ imaging of xylan in chemically pretreated plant cell walls. Native, untreated corn stover cell wall samples were organosolv-pretreated to remove 55–70% of the cell wall xylan (Additional file 1: Table S3, S4). Figure 5 compares the SRS images of two different types of cell walls, i.e., the vascular bundle cell wall and the parenchyma cell wall of the control and the xylan-reduced cell wall sample. When the relative cell wall xylan content was reduced from 100% to ~30 to 45% in the organosolv-pretreated cell walls, SRS signals from all four xylan frequencies also dropped. This correlation confirms that those Raman frequencies are specific to xylan content. Figure 5 also shows that the 1471 and 1219 cm−1 bands appear to have stronger SRS signals. Therefore, the SRS bands at 1471 and 1219 cm−1, especially the band at 1471 cm−1, might be more useful for imaging cell wall chemical details.
Fig. 5

Comparison of SRS images of xylan in the native, untreated corn stover (control) and organosolv-pretreated corn stover cell walls. Two types of cell walls are compared: secondary cell walls in the vascular bundle (a–d, i–l, q–t) and parenchyma cell walls (e–h, m–p, u–x). Scale bar = 30 µm

In situ tracking of cell wall xylan during enzymatic digestion

We demonstrated the capability of SRS to in situ image xylan in cell walls. Xylan, cellulose, and lignin were imaged by SRS for the same cell wall region following xylanase digestion. Figure 6 shows the distribution of lignin (1600 cm−1), cellulose (1100 cm−1), and xylan (1471 cm−1) in the same cell walls, before and after xylanase treatment. As shown in bright-field images, xylan digestion did not introduce significant cell wall damage (Fig. 6a1, 1′). Lignin distribution was not affected by the xylanase digestion as can be seen in both of the lignin distribution images (Fig. 6a2, 2′); as well as in the comparison of overall image intensities (Fig. 6b) which shows almost no change before and after xylanase digestion. Cellulose Raman images show only a slight change (Fig. 6a3, 3′). In contrast to lignin and cellulose Raman channels, dramatic intensity drop was observed in the xylan channel (Fig. 6a4, 4′). Importantly, besides significant reduction in the SRS signal, xylan distribution in cell walls was also altered by enzymatic digestion, often taking on punctate type morphology (arrow, Fig. 6). Zoomed-in xylan images of two representative areas in the vascular bundle region show significant xylan distribution changes due to the enzymatic digestion.
Fig. 6

In situ tracking of lignin, cellulose, and xylan in deacetylated corn stover cell walls before and after xylan digestion by SRS. a Comparison of bright-field images of cell walls and SRS images of lignin, cellulose and xylan in the same cell walls. b Comparison of the relative overall SRS signal change in the images (before enzyme digestion = 100%) (Lig lignin, Cel cellulose and Xyl xylan; error bar are from 5 repeat digestion experiments). Lignin and cellulose are not affected by xylanases, and xylan is significantly reduced due to xylanases digestion. c Zoom-in bright-field images of cell wall and SRS images of xylan in two areas in vascular bundle region (c 14: before xylan digestion; and c 1′–4′: after xylan digestion) show significant xylan distribution changes in the cell wall due to the heterogeneous enzymatic digestion. Raman frequencies used for SRS imaging: lignin—1600 cm−1, cellulose—1100 cm−1 and xylan—1471 cm−1. Scale bar = 20 µm

More striking xylanases-induced change in xylan distribution can be revealed by the in situ 3D SRS imaging of xylan in the same cell wall region following xylanases digestion. Figure 7 compares the 3D reconstructions of xylan’s SRS signal at 1471 cm−1 before and after xylanases digestion. Xylan concentration as reflected by its SRS signal intensity clearly diminishes from cell lumen towards cell corner, whereas the remaining xylan is more located at cell corners. This 3D imaging technique could be useful for tracking xylan change under more complicate chemical/biological treatment conditions.
Fig. 7

In situ 3D SRS imaging to track xylan distribution in deacetylated corn stover cell wall before and after xylan digestion. a–d Before digestion. a′–d′ The same cell wall regions in ad after xylanases digestion for comparison. Xylan Raman frequency at 1471 cm−1 was chosen for SRS imaging. a, b, a′, b′ cell corner; c, d, c′, d′cell wall between two cell corners

Conclusions

We report the identification of xylan-specific Raman bands using xylanases to specifically remove xylan from the polymer matrix of deacetylated corn stover cell walls. We further used SRS microscopic imaging to verify these xylan-specific Raman band assignments using organosolv-pretreated native corn stover, which confirmed that these Raman bands are closely associated with the xylan content. Using the highest sensitivity xylan band as an example, we demonstrated that xylan can be resolved from cellulose and lignin in situ using enzymatic digestion and label-free SRS microscopy in both 2D and 3D. We believe that this novel approach can be used to map xylan in plant cell walls and that this ability will enhance our understanding of the role played by xylan in cell wall biosynthesis and deconstruction.

Methods

Deacetylated corn stover

The control corn stover was deacetylated and disc refined as previously described [63], to remove approximately 80% of the acetyl groups and improve xylanase digestion without significantly altering the cellulose, xylan, and lignin content. In brief, dry native corn stover was added to a dilute 0.1 M sodium hydroxide to make the final 8% (w/w) total solids slurry. The slurry was heated to 80 °C for 2 h, then drained, extensively washed and dried using a continuous screw press. The solids fraction was further milled with a commercial scale disc refining facility at the Andritz pilot plant and R&D laboratory in Springfield (Ohio, United States).

Deacetylated corn stover sections were prepared by deacetylation of corn stover rind sticks (~1 cm long) using 0.1 M hydroxide at 75 °C. Deacetylated rind sticks were rinsed extensively until pH ~7 was attained and then transversely sectioned into 50-µm slices with a rotary microtome (RM2235, Leica).

Xylan model compounds

Oat spelts xylan (X-0627), birchwood xylan (X-0502), and d-xylose (58-86-6, >99%) were from Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, United States. Xylo-oligosaccharides with degree of polymerization ranging from two to seven were from Cascade Analytical Reagents & Biochemical, CAS 9014-63-5. The chemical compositional analysis for xylan model compounds was done by NREL laboratory analytical procedures [64]. Basically, a strong sulfuric acid solution was used for primary hydrolysis of the sample, followed by dilution with water and a secondary high-temperature hydrolysis step. This procedure hydrolyzes the carbohydrate fraction to soluble monosaccharides, leaving a lignin-rich residue to be vacuum filtered and measured gravimetrically. The sugars in the hydrolysate solution were measured as monomers to determine the carbohydrate fraction of the sample. Spelts xylan also contains 3–4% glucuronic acids as part of xylan aside from the above NREL chemical compositional results. Birchwood xylan contains about 10–12% glucuronic acid as part of xylan.

Enzymatic digestion of deacetylated corn stover to partially remove xylan from cell walls

The deacetylated corn stover solids were washed with 20 mM sodium acetate and 100 mM sodium chloride buffer (pH 4.8) solution. The commercial enzyme product (Multifect® Xylanase from DuPont™ Genencor®, Palo Alto, California, United States) was desalted in 10 mL aliquots using two serial HiPrep 26/10 desalting columns (GE Life Sciences, Piscataway NJ) equilibrated in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.8) with 100 mM sodium chloride. Protein containing fractions were pooled and protein concentration determined using the BCA protein assay (Pierce Rockford, IL). Enzyme samples were desalted less than 2 days before use, with fresh material being generated for each experiment as desalted commercial enzymes tend to degrade and precipitate within a few days. The enzyme solution was added to same buffer solution containing deacetylated corn stover solids at 1% with enzyme loading at 3.6–58 mg/g xylan. Enzymatic digestions were performed in 2.5 mL shaker tubes in a shaking incubator at 45 °C and 150 rpm for up to 40 h.

Organosolv treatment of native corn stover

Organosolv treatment of native corn stover was performed following the same experimental procedure published previously [65]. The solution for organosolv treatment contained methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), acetone and water in the following ratio: MIBK:acetone:water = 11:44:44 (g:g:g, 100 mL). The sulfuric acid concentration remained at 1.2 wt%. After 2 min at 160 °C, 55% of the cell wall xylan was solubilized (45% remaining). After 10 min, 70% of cell wall xylan was solubilized (30% remaining). The xylan removal was measured according to the same experimental procedure published previously [65]. Basically, it was calculated by comparing the total amount of xylan (from compositional analysis of sample prior treatment) and the amount of sugar monomers in supernatant after organosolv treatment.

Raman spectroscopic analysis

All Raman spectra were acquired on a LabRam HR800 confocal Raman system (Horiba Jobin–Yvon, Edison, New Jersey, United States) equipped with an Olympus BX41 microscope and a 785 nm diode laser source. Sample powder was placed on a glass cover slide for measurement. The excitation beam was focused above the sample through a 40X objective lens (Olympus, UPlanSApo, 0.95 NA). The Raman scattering light from the sample was collected by the same objective lens. Before each spectrum acquisition, the sample was photo-bleached for 30 min to effectively reduce the fluorescence background. This is indicated as the baseline shift between two adjacent spectrum scans, which was less than 10%. With fluorescence background reduced, long integration times (usually 200 s) were used so that the maximum Raman signal intensity is about ~80% of the full dynamic range of the CCD detector. For each sample, more than 30 times accumulations were acquired to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. Since in confocal Raman microscopy, the sampling volume is small and to minimize sampling error, more than 30 samples were measured for the each condition.

SRS imaging

The SRS imaging was conducted on the same SRS microscope as described previously [25]. In brief, a high-power Nd:YO4 oscillator (HighQ picoTRAIN, Spectra-Physics) producing 7 ps pulse trains at 1064 nm (15 W max) and 532 nm (9 W max) was used. 2 W of the 1064 nm light was used as the Stokes beam. The 532 nm beam was directed to pump an optic parametric oscillator (Levante Emerald, APE GmbH, Germany) to produce 6 ps tunable wavelength pulse train as the pump beam. The wavelength of the pump beam was adjusted for the selected Raman frequency. For example, it was tuned to 909.2 nm for lignin’s resonance frequency at 1600 cm−1. The Stokes beam was intensity-modulated by an acoustic optic modulator (3080-122, Crystal Technology) at 10 MHz with 80% modulation depth, and then combined with the pump beams by a long-pass beam combiner (1064dcrb, Chroma). The two beams were routed to a custom modified mirror-scanning microscope system (BX62WI/FV300, Olympus) attached with an Olympus inverted microscope. Typical laser power at the sample plane was 80 mW for each beam, and this allowed for continuous imaging without causing any noticeable photo-damage. The light transmitted through the sample was collected by a high numeric aperture condenser (1.45 NA O, Nikon), and filtered by an optical filter (CARS980/220, Chroma) to block the Stokes beam completely so that only amplitude modulation on the pump beams due to the SRS process was detected. The pump beam intensity was detected by a large-area silicon PIN photodiode (FDS1010, Thorlabs) back-biased at 70 V. A lock-in amplifier (SR844, Stanford Research Systems) was used to detect the intensity change in the pump beam. 3D SRS imaging was performed by collect a stack of images along Z axis and the 3D rendering of the image stack was processed in Matlab.

Xylanase digestion of deacetylated corn stover transverse sections

An incubation chamber was constructed by two pieces of #1 glass microscope coverslips sandwiched by a silicon separator (Grace Bio-Labs, Oregon, United States). One slice of the 50-μm deacetylated corn stover slice was immersed in 125 µL 20 mM sodium acetate and 100 mM sodium chloride buffer (pH 4.8) solution containing Multifect® Xylanase (DuPont™ Genencor®, Palo Alto, California, United States). The enzyme loading was approximately 93 mg/g xylan. The chamber was incubated at 45 °C for 40 h for enzymatic digestion.

Abbreviations

SRS: 

stimulated Raman scattering

CARS: 

coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YZ performed Raman spectroscopy and stimulated Raman spectroscopy measurements. JMY performed enzyme digestion experiments. AM performed deacetylation and organosolv treatments. MPT, TBV, and SRD provided corn stover and xylan models. YZ wrote the manuscript. YZ, MEH, JMY, AM, TBV, and SRD revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Deborah Hyman and Justin Sluiter both from National Renewable Energy Laboratory for their chemical compositional analysis, and David K. Johnson from National Renewable Energy Laboratory for his helpful discussion. The authors also thank Debra Mohnen from the Complex Carbohydrate Research Center (CCRC) for her valuable discussions regarding the experimental protocols and conclusions.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of supporting data

The data supporting the results of this article are included in this published article and its supplementary information document.

Funding

The authors also acknowledge support from the BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), a DOE Bioenergy Research Center funded by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) in the DOE Office of Science.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, USA
(2)
National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, USA
(3)
BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, USA

References

  1. Shekiro J, Kuhn EM, Selig MJ, Nagle NJ, Decker SR, Elander RT. Enzymatic Conversion of Xylan Residues from Dilute Acid-Pretreated Corn Stover. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;168(2):421–33. doi:10.1007/s12010-012-9786-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Deutschmann R, Dekker RFH. From plant biomass to bio-based chemicals: latest developments in xylan research. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30(6):1627–40. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.07.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mäkinen KK. The rocky road of xylitol to its clinical application. J Dent Res. 2000;79(6):1352–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa AM, Dekker RF, Giese EC. Bioactive oligosaccharides: production, biological functions, and potential commercial applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. Chung YC, Hsu CK, Ko CY, Chan YC. Dietary intake of xylooligosaccharides improves the intestinal microbiota, fecal moisture, and pH value in the elderly. Nutr Res. 2007;27(12):756–61. doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2007.09.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Crittenden R, Karppinen S, Ojanen S, Tenkanen M, Fagerstrm R, Mtt J, et al. In vitro fermentation of cereal dietary fibre carbohydrates by probiotic and intestinal bacteria. J Sci Food Agric. 2002;82(8):781–9. doi:10.1002/jsfa.1095.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Manisseri C, Gudipati M. Bioactive xylo-oligosaccharides from wheat bran soluble polysaccharides. LWT Food Science and Technol. 2010;43(3):421–30. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2009.09.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ohbuchi T, Takahashi T, Azumi N, Sakaino M. Structual analysis of neutral and acidic xylooligosaccharides from hardwood kraft pulp, and their utilization by intestinal bacteria in vitro. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73(9):2070–6. doi:10.1271/bbb.90260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pan X, Wu T, Zhang L, Cai L, Song Z. Influence of oligosaccharides on the growth and tolerance capacity of lactobacilli to simulated stress environment. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48(3):362–7. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02539.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rycroft CE, Jones MR, Gibson GR, Rastall RA. A comparative in vitro evaluation of the fermentation properties of prebiotic oligosaccharides. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(5):878–87. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01446.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ng A, Greenshields RN, Waldron KW. Oxidative cross-linking of corn bran hemicellulose: formation of ferulic acid dehydrodimers. Carbohydr Res. 1997;303(4):459–62. doi:10.1016/S0008-6215(97)00193-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Aaltonen O, Jauhiainen O. The preparation of lignocellulosic aerogels from ionic liquid solutions. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;75(1):125–9. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouxin F, Marinkovic S, Bras JL, Estrine B. Direct conversion of xylan into alkyl pentosides. Carbohydr Res. 2010;345(17):2469–73. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2010.09.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Goksu EI, Karamanlioglu M, Bakir U, Yilmaz L, Yilmazer U. Production and characterization of films from cotton stalk xylan. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(26):10685–91. doi:10.1021/jf071893i.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Šimkovic I, Mlynár J, Alföldi J. Modification of corn cob meal with quarternary ammonium groups. Carbohydr Polym. 1992;17(4):285–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Thiebaud S, Borredon M. Analysis of the liquid fraction after esterification of sawdust with octanoyl chloride—Production of esterified hemicelluloses. Bioresour Technol. 1998;63(2):139–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ebringerová A, Sroková I, Talába P, Kačuráková M, Hromádková Z. Amphiphilic beechwood glucuronoxylan derivatives. J Appl Polym Sci. 1998;67(9):1523–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Buslov DK, Kaputski FN, Sushko NI, Torgashev VI, Solov’eva LV, Tsarenkov VM, et al. Infrared spectroscopic analysis of the structure of xylans. J Appl Spectrosc. 2009;76(6):801–5. doi:10.1007/s10812-010-9282-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar R, Mago G, Balan V, Wyman CE. Physical and chemical characterizations of corn stover and poplar solids resulting from leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(17):3948–62. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.075.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yin Y, Berglund L, Salmén L. Effect of steam treatment on the properties of wood cell walls. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12(1):194–202. doi:10.1021/bm101144m.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu L, Ye XP, Womac AR, Sokhansanj S. Variability of biomass chemical composition and rapid analysis using FT-NIR techniques. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;81(4):820–9. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.058.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Philip Ye X, Liu L, Hayes D, Womac A, Hong K, Sokhansanj S. Fast classification and compositional analysis of cornstover fractions using Fourier transform near-infrared techniques. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(15):7323–32. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.063.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelley SS, Rials TG, Snell R, Groom LH, Sluiter A. Use of near infrared spectroscopy to measure the chemical and mechanical properties of solid wood. Wood Sci Technol. 2004;38(4):257–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Monrroy M, Mendonça RT, Ruiz J, Baeza J, Freer J. Estimating glucan, xylan, and methylglucuronic acids in kraft pulps of Eucalyptus globulus using FT-NIR spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. J Wood Chem Technol. 2009;29(2):150–63. doi:10.1080/02773810902879017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Ding S-Y. Coherent Raman Microscopy Analysis of Plant Cell Walls. In: Himmel ME, editor. Biomass Conversion. Methods in molecular biology. New York: Humana Press; 2012. p. 49–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Saar BG, Zeng YN, Freudiger CW, Liu YS, Himmel ME, Xie XS, et al. Label-Free, real-time monitoring of biomass processing with stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Angew Chem. 2010;49(32):5476–9. doi:10.1002/anie.201000900.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeng Y, Saar B, Friedrich M, Chen F, Liu Y-S, Dixon R, et al. Imaging Lignin-Downregulated Alfalfa Using Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy. Bioenerg Res. 2010;3(3):272–7. doi:10.1007/s12155-010-9079-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeng Y, Zhao S, Yang S, Ding S-Y. Lignin plays a negative role in the biochemical process for producing lignocellulosic biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;27:38–45. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zeng Y, Zhao S, Wei H, Tucker M, Himmel M, Mosier N, et al. In situ micro-spectroscopic investigation of lignin in poplar cell walls pretreated by maleic acid. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s13068-015-0312-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Gierlinger N, Schwanninger M. Chemical Imaging of Poplar Wood Cell Walls by Confocal Raman Microscopy. Plant Physiol. 2006;140(4):1246–54. doi:10.1104/pp.105.066993.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Gierlinger N, Keplinger T, Harrington M. Imaging of plant cell walls by confocal Raman microscopy. Nat Protocols. 2012;7(9):1694-708. http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v7/n9/abs/nprot.2012.092.html#supplementary-information.
  32. Gierlinger N, Keplinger T, Harrington M, Schwanninger M. Raman imaging of lignocellulosic feedstock. In: van de Ven T, Kadla J, editors. Cellulose–biomass conversion. Croatia: InTech; 2013.Google Scholar
  33. Sun L, Simmons BA, Singh S. Understanding tissue specific compositions of bioenergy feedstocks through hyperspectral Raman imaging. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108(2):286–95. doi:10.1002/bit.22931.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Gardiner ES, Sarko A. Packing analysis of carbohydrates and polysaccharides. 16. The crystal structures of celluloses IVI and IVII. Can J Chem. 1985;63(1):173–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Gregory ACE, O’Connell AP, Bolwell GP. Xylans. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1998;15(1):439–56. doi:10.1080/02648725.1998.10647965.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. James HW, Rajai HA. Raman spectra of celluloses. The structures of cellulose. ACS Symposium series, vol. 340. Washington: ACS Publications; 1987. p. 151–68.Google Scholar
  37. Wiley JH, Atalla RH. Band assignments in the Raman spectra of celluloses. Carbohydr Res. 1987;160:113–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Schenzel K, Fischer S. NIR FT Raman spectroscopy–a rapid analytical tool for detecting the transformation of cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose. 2001;8(1):49–57. doi:10.1023/a:1016616920539.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Agarwal UP, Ralph SA. FT-Raman spectroscopy of wood: identifying contributions of lignin and carbohydrate polymers in the spectrum of black spruce (Picea mariana). Appl Spectrosc. 1997;51(11):1648–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Kačuráková M, Wellner N, Ebringerová A, Hromádková Z, Wilson RH, Belton PS. Characterisation of xylan-type polysaccharides and associated cell wall components by FT-IR and FT-Raman spectroscopies. Food Hydrocolloids. 1999;13(1):35–41. doi:10.1016/S0268-005X(98)00067-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Chylińska M, Szymańska-Chargot M, Zdunek A. Imaging of polysaccharides in the tomato cell wall with Raman microspectroscopy. Plant Methods. 2014;10:14. doi:10.1186/1746-4811-10-14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Himmelsbach DS, Khahili S, Akin DE. Near-infrared–Fourier-transform–Raman microspectroscopic imaging of flax stems. Vib Spectrosc. 1999;19(2):361–7. doi:10.1016/S0924-2031(98)00065-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Chu L-Q, Masyuko R, Sweedler JV, Bohn PW. Base-induced delignification of miscanthus x giganteus studied by three-dimensional confocal raman imaging. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(13):4919–25. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.096.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Carlson KP. A investigation of the vibrational spectra of the cellodextrins. Georgia Institute of Technology; 1979.Google Scholar
  45. Edwards SL. An investigation of the vibrational spectra of the pentose sugars. Georgia Institute of Technology; 1976 (Doctoral Dissertation).Google Scholar
  46. Mathlouthi M, Koenig JL. Vibrational spectra of carbohydrates. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1986;44:7–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Szymańska-Chargot M, Chylińska M, Pieczywek PM, Rösch P, Schmitt M, Popp J, et al. Raman imaging of changes in the polysaccharides distribution in the cell wall during apple fruit development and senescence. Planta. 2016;243:935–45. doi:10.1007/s00425-015-2456-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Agarwal UP. An overview of Raman spectroscopy as applied to lignocellulosic materials. In: Argyropoulos DS, editor. Advances in lignocellulosics characterization. Atlanta: TAPPI Press; 1999. p. 209–25.Google Scholar
  49. Bansil R, Yannas IV, Stanley HE. Raman spectroscopy: a structural probe of glycosaminoglycans. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978;541(4):535–42. doi:10.1016/0304-4165(78)90163-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhbankov RG, Andrianov VM, Marchewka MK. Fourier transform IR and Raman spectroscopy and structure of carbohydrates. J Mol Struct. 1997;436–437:637–54. doi:10.1016/s0022-2860(97)00141-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Wells HA Jr, Atalla RH. An investigation of the vibrational spectra of glucose, galactose and mannose. J Mol Struct. 1990;224:385–424. doi:10.1016/0022-2860(90)87031-r.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Engelsen SB, Nørgaard L. Comparative vibrational spectroscopy for determination of quality parameters in amidated pectins as evaluated by chemometrics. Carbohydr Polym. 1996;30(1):9–24. doi:10.1016/s0144-8617(96)00068-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Heitner C, Dimmel D, Schmidt J. Lignin and lignans: advances in chemistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Agarwal U. Raman imaging to investigate ultrastructure and composition of plant cell walls: distribution of lignin and cellulose in black spruce wood (Picea mariana). Planta. 2006;224(5):1141–53. doi:10.1007/s00425-006-0295-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Yu P, Block H, Niu Z, Doiron K. Rapid characterization of molecular chemistry, nutrient make-up and microlocation of internal seed tissue. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2007;14(4):382–90. doi:10.1107/S0909049507014264.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Wetzel D, Eilert A, Pietrzak L, Miller S, Sweat J. Ultraspatially-resolved synchrotron infrared microspectroscopy of plant tissue in situ. Cell Mol Biol. 1998;44(1):145–68.Google Scholar
  57. Budevska BO. Vibrational spectroscopy imaging of agricultural products. In: Griffiths PR, editor. Handbook of vibrational spectroscopy. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006.Google Scholar
  58. Himmelsbach DS, Akin DE. Near-infrared Fourier-transform Raman spectroscopy of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) stems. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46(3):991–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Lupoi JS, Smith EA. Characterization of woody and herbaceous biomasses lignin composition with 1064 nm dispersive multichannel Raman spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc. 2012;66(8):903–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Agarwal UP, McSweeny JD, Ralph SA. FT–Raman investigation of milled-wood lignins: softwood, hardwood, and chemically modified black spruce lignins. J Wood Chem Technol. 2011;31(4):324–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Hänninen T, Kontturi E, Vuorinen T. Distribution of lignin and its coniferyl alcohol and coniferyl aldehyde groups in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris as observed by Raman imaging. Phytochemistry. 2011;72(14):1889–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Agarwal UP, Ralph SA. Determination of ethylenic residues in wood and TMP of spruce by FT-Raman spectroscopy. Holzforschung. 2008;62(6):667–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Chen X, Shekiro J, Pschorn T, Sabourin M, Tao L, Elander R, et al. A highly efficient dilute alkali deacetylation and mechanical (disc) refining process for the conversion of renewable biomass to lower cost sugars. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Sluiter JB, Ruiz RO, Scarlata CJ, Sluiter AD, Templeton DW. Compositional Analysis of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks. Review and Description of Methods. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(16):9043–53. doi:10.1021/jf1008023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Mittal A, Vinzant TB, Brunecky R, Black SK, Pilath HM, Himmel ME, et al. Investigation of the role of lignin in biphasic xylan hydrolysis during dilute acid and organosolv pretreatment of corn stover. Green Chem. 2015;17(3):1546–58. doi:10.1039/c4gc02258k.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement