Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of methodologies used to determine aromatic lignin unit ratios in lignocellulosic biomass

Biotechnology for Biofuels volume 14, Article number: 58 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multiple analytical methods have been developed to determine the ratios of aromatic lignin units, particularly the syringyl/guaiacyl (S/G) ratio, of lignin biopolymers in plant cell walls. Chemical degradation methods such as thioacidolysis produce aromatic lignin units that are released from certain linkages and may induce chemical changes rendering it difficult to distinguish and determine the source of specific aromatic lignin units released, as is the case with nitrobenzene oxidation methodology. NMR methods provide powerful tools used to analyze cell walls for lignin composition and linkage information. Pyrolysis-mass spectrometry methods are also widely used, particularly as high-throughput methodologies. However, the different techniques used to analyze aromatic lignin unit ratios frequently yield different results within and across particular studies, making it difficult to interpret and compare results. This also makes it difficult to obtain meaningful insights relating these measurements to other characteristics of plant cell walls that may impact biomass sustainability and conversion metrics for the production of bio-derived fuels and chemicals.

Results

The authors compared the S/G lignin unit ratios obtained from thioacidolysis, pyrolysis-molecular beam mass spectrometry (py-MBMS), HSQC liquid-state NMR and solid-state (ss) NMR methodologies of pine, several genotypes of poplar, and corn stover biomass. An underutilized approach to deconvolute ssNMR spectra was implemented to derive S/G ratios. The S/G ratios obtained for the samples did not agree across the different methods, but trends were similar with the most agreement among the py-MBMS, HSQC NMR and deconvoluted ssNMR methods. The relationship between S/G, thioacidolysis yields, and linkage analysis determined by HSQC is also addressed.

Conclusions

This work demonstrates that different methods using chemical, thermal, and non-destructive NMR techniques to determine native lignin S/G ratios in plant cell walls may yield different results depending on species and linkage abundances. Spectral deconvolution can be applied to many hardwoods with lignin dominated by S and G units, but the results may not be reliable for some woody and grassy species of more diverse lignin composition. HSQC may be a better method for analyzing lignin in those species given the wealth of information provided on additional aromatic moieties and bond linkages. Additionally, trends or correlations in lignin characteristics such as S/G ratios and lignin linkages within the same species such as poplar may not necessarily exhibit the same trends or correlations made across different biomass types. Careful consideration is required when choosing a method to measure S/G ratios and the benefits and shortcomings of each method discussed here are summarized.

Introduction

Lignin is an abundant aromatic polymer found in plant cell walls where it contributes to defense against insects and microbes, structural support of the plant, and water and nutrient transport [1]. Lignin is composed of aromatic units that vary in structure and composition depending on the plant species, tissue type, and specific cell wall layer [2, 3]. The lignin content in hardwood tree species generally ranges from 18 to 30% of the dry wood mass and varies in the ratio of aromatic lignin units. Hardwood lignin consists primarily of sinapyl or syringyl (S) phenylpropanoid units and coniferyl or guaiacyl (G) phenylpropanoid units and a small amount of p-coumaryl (H) phenylpropanoid units. Softwood tree species such as pines consist of lignins that are predominantly composed of G units, while grasses have lignin composed of S, G, and H units and also contain ferulates and coumarates in the cell walls. The S, G, and H canonical monolignols are used to form most lignin polymers in most types of biomass but other non-conventional aromatic units such as caffeyl alcohol, tricin, resveratrol and others occur in certain tissue types and biomass species as reviewed in del Rio et al. [4].

In the context of developing technologies to use plant biomass as a source of renewable feedstock for fuels and chemicals, there has been significant interest in how lignin content and composition facilitates or inhibits access to cell wall carbohydrates by cellulolytic enzymes, and utilization of the lignin itself [5, 6]. Increased delignification rates of hardwoods have been shown to correlate with increases in S/G ratios [7]. For example, higher S content in woody species has been correlated with greater pulping efficiency [8, 9]. These results have been suggested to be due in part to the lower abundance of carbon–carbon linkages among S units relative to other aromatic lignin units [10, 11]. Lignin content and S/G ratios could be critical biomass attributes in a biorefinery processes, particularly related to how these metrics impact enzymatic or acidic hydrolysis of biomass to produce fermentable sugars [12,13,14]. The relative abundance of lignin aromatic units has also been shown to correlate with anaerobic digestion of biomass to produce methane [15]. Thus, by breeding or by directly engineering the lignin biosynthetic pathway in biomass to alter S/G ratios, biomass conversion to bioproducts and biofuels can be made more efficient and economical [16].

Various methods can be used to determine the relative abundance of aromatic lignin units, particularly the ratio of the most abundant S and G units (S/G ratio). Thioacidolysis is a common chemical degradation method used to quantitatively determine the S/G ratio of non-condensed lignin units in various types of plants [17, 18]. Thioacidolysis proceeds by cleaving β-O-4 ether linkages, where additional steps such as Raney nickel desulfurization may be implemented to analyze dimers with C–C linkages [19, 20]. Variations in lignin structures may lead to differences in S, G, and H unit yields obtained from thioacidolysis [17]. For example, the higher occurrence of C–C linkages involving the 5-position of G units in softwood lignins may negatively impact thioacidolysis yields, while thioacidolysis yields may be higher from hardwood lignins containing more S units (in comparison to softwoods) bound by ether linkages [18, 21]. Observations that higher S/G ratio lignins correspond to a more effective release of total aromatic units have been previously reported [22,23,24,25,26,27]. However, recent work has indicated that the S/G ratio of poplar as determined by thioacidolysis is not correlated to the yield of aromatic units produced by reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF), a thermochemical conversion technique relevant to lignin characterization or lignin upgrading strategies [28].

Pyrolysis or thermal degradative methods coupled with chromatographic and/or mass spectrometry techniques can be performed on minimally processed biomass, yield highly reproducible results, and can be used in high-throughput platforms to analyze lignin content and composition in biomass [3, 29,30,31,32,33]. However, thermal degradation may overestimate the S content as products generated from labile ether linkages are detected whereas condensed linkages (either inherent or produced) may not be incorporated in the analyses, not unlike chemical degradation methods [34, 35]. Additionally, the S/G ratios measured by analysis of pyrolysis products do not always compare well with other degradative techniques, particularly as some phenolic pyrolysates may not originate from lignin (for example, there may be overlaps of G-lignin and ferulate-derived species) [36,37,38,39,40,41].

1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, in both solution or gel and solid-state, has been widely used to study the structure and composition of lignin [42, 43]. Additionally, 31P NMR has been employed as a method to investigate lignin structure by derivatization of hydroxyl groups in lignin subunits [44,45,46]. While this method is useful for analysis of certain functional groups, it requires extensive sample preparation and alteration of lignin, it only analyzes solubilized components, and is not necessarily capable of resolving S and G units [47].

2D heteronuclear (1H–13C) single quantum correlation (HSQC) spectroscopy is used to estimate S/G ratios from either isolated lignin or whole biomass among many different plant species, and alleviates some of the spectral overlap that occurs in 1D 1H and 13C methods; however, the method is not fully quantitative due to differential relaxation of the nuclei being analyzed [43, 48]. Whole cell wall analysis by NMR in a gel state can be performed by solubilizing biomass in various solvents, but these methods may suffer from incomplete solubilization, sample heterogeneity, and differences in relaxation times that can affect S/G ratio measurements [49,50,51]. 2D NMR methods may use correction factors, but this methodology resulted in lower S/G ratios determined for lignin in hardwood species than S/G ratios determined by chemical degradation methods [52]. More recently, quantitative 2D NMR methods such as HSQC0 [53] have been developed that addresses the relaxation problems associated with the previous methods to improve quantitation of aromatic lignin units [54]. The results from quantitative HSQC0 have shown lower S/G ratios for Miscanthus than the previously reported ratios measured by thioacidolysis (which only detects aromatic lignin units released from cleavage of β-O-4 linkages) [54, 55]. More recently HSQC0 has been employed to predict depolymerization yields from lignin [56]. Generally, NMR methods in use today accommodate either isolated lignin or whole biomass for analysis [42].

A method to measure S/G ratios of hardwoods, without the need for degradation or extensive sample preparation, was developed by Manders et al. using 13C solid-state NMR (ssNMR) [57] and versions of the method have been applied broadly [58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. The 13C ssNMR method determines the S/G ratio by subtracting a softwood lignin spectrum (softwood lignin consisting primarily of G units) from a hardwood spectrum. The obvious advantage of this approach comes from omitting the time-consuming lignin isolation step required in most chemical degradation methods and many spectroscopic methods, which may lead to enrichment of S units. However, the method developed by Manders assumes that the softwood G-lignin 13C ssNMR spectroscopic profile in the ~ 150 ppm range matches the G-lignin sub-profile of S- and G-rich hardwood, which may not be universally applicable across all biomass types [61]. As an alternative to the Manders method, spectral deconvolution of the aromatic region from quantitative or semi-quantitative 13C ssNMR data has been used to obtain lignin composition data [65,66,67,68,69].

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a comparison of the S/G ratios determined for a series of biomass samples including pine (softwood), poplar (hardwood), and corn stover (grass) as determined by thioacidolysis, py-MBMS, gel-state HSQC NMR, and 13C ssNMR using two types of data analysis including a spectral deconvolution peak-fitting analysis to determine the relationships between analytical methodologies and the resulting aromatic lignin unit ratios and linkages determined in different types of biomass. The novelty of this work is the considered comparison of multiple deconstructive and non-destructive lignin analysis methods applied to multiple samples from a single biomass type (poplar). This enabled a unique comparison of characterization techniques and an evaluation of the understanding of lignin composition and structure provided by each technique. Additionally, softwood and corn stover samples were analyzed for lignin composition and structure to demonstrate how analytical limitations may vary among biomass types.

Results

Thioacidolysis

Thioacidolysis yields of aromatic lignin units for each of the biomass samples are presented in Table 1 (also Additional file 1: Table S1 with other S/G values determined by other methods). The Pearson correlation coefficient between the total yield of thioacidolysis-released aromatic lignin units on a g−1 of biomass basis and the yield of aromatic lignin units reported g−1 of estimated lignin content (based on py-MBMS analysis) was 0.93; therefore, comparison of yields on g−1 of estimated lignin content or a g−1 of biomass would be similar and are subsequently discussed on a g−1 of biomass basis as the lignin content was an estimate based on py-MBMS analysis. While the H unit content determined by thioacidolysis was consistent among the set of poplar samples, the S and G unit content varied widely, both in S/G ratio and total aromatic lignin unit yields. The S/G ratio determined by thioacidolysis did not correlate with the total yield of aromatic units (Pearson correlation = − 0.08, Additional file 2: Table S2). However, the yield of S units was the primary driver in the total yield of thioethylated aromatic lignin units for data both within the set of poplar samples (Pearson correlation of S, total units = 0.92, Pearson correlation of G, total units = 0.62) and including the corn stover (Pearson correlation of S, total units = 0.94, Pearson correlation of G, total units = 0.68, Additional file 3: Table S3). Thioacidolysis of pine produced only G and H-derived units, similar to previously reported values [18]. The corn stover sample yielded lower total aromatic lignin units from thioacidolysis than most of the hardwoods and softwood samples, which is typical for grasses [17, 18].

Table 1 Aromatic lignin unit content of biomass determined by thioacidolysis (average of n = 2 samples, not all samples were analyzed by thioacidolysis and are denoted N/A)
Full size table

Py-MBMS

Py-MBMS analysis of the biomass samples present in sufficient quantity (not all samples were analyzed due to low mass availability) produced spectra consisting of ions derived from S, G, and H lignin units bound by various types of linkages. Lignin contents were determined based on methods described previously [29, 31, 32] in order to estimate Klason lignin content (wt %) using mean-normalized spectra to remove mass-dependent variation; S/G ratios were determined using unique (minimal-overlapping) ions of known origin that produced S/G ratios consistent with other methods in the literature [31, 70]. Traditional S/G ratios determined by py-MBMS are assumed as being derived from S, G, and H units where this method was established based on the results from NMR and thioacidolysis, but theoretically could include additional or alternative ions, particularly as some of the ions chosen to determine S/G do potentially originate from multiple sources to varying degrees.

Lignin content estimates of the poplar samples by py-MBMS ranged from 20.6 to 25.8 wt% lignin (Table 2). Traditional S/G ratios determined for the poplar samples using py-MBMS ranged from 1.3 to 2.2. Focusing on ions between 50 and 250 due to the nature of ions outside of that range originating primarily from noise and overlapping sources, the variance of the spectra was highest for m/z 138 (G-lignin), 151 (G-lignin, this ion may also originate from ferulate), 165 (S-lignin), and 181 (S-lignin), where () indicates origin of ion. The lignin content and S/G based on py-MBMS data were weakly correlated (Pearson correlation = 0.54) within the poplar samples. Lignin content as determined by py-MBMS did not strongly correlate with thioacidolysis yields for the entire poplar set either (Pearson correlation = 0.45, Additional file 2: Table S2). However, the majority of the poplar lignin estimates from py-MBMS did appear to correlate well with aromatic peak abundances from the peak-fit NMR data (values in Additional file 1: Table S1). The lignin content of the NIST 8493 Monterey pine was provided by the supplier based on Klason results to be 26.6 wt% lignin, and the lignin content of the FCIC corn stover was estimated as 13.7 wt% relative to a corn stover sample of known Klason content using py-MBMS spectra. Table 2 provides characterization data of the biomass samples based on py-MBMS analysis. The S/G ratio determined for the NIST pine was 0.2 since non-zero values of the ions otherwise derived from S units were observed in the spectra, but these values could not be differentiated from noise and fragment ions and because pine does not produce S-lignin, the S/G for NIST pine was assigned to 0. Because the type and amount of noise and/or fragmentation contributing to the abundance of these ions is not known or likely to be consistent for each of the biomass types, this value was not adjusted across the other samples.

Table 2 Py-MBMS characterization of lignin content and S/G ratios in select biomass samples (not all samples were analyzable by py-MBMS and are denoted N/A)
Full size table

Gel-state NMR (HSQC)

Gel-state HSQCs were collected on all poplar samples, as well as corn stover and pine, according to Mansfield et al. [51]. Generally, S/G ratios were consistent over triplicate runs, although the percent error ranged from as low as 2% to as high as 16%. It is believed that this range in error is partly due to inconsistencies in how well individual samples formed a gel (visual observation) and could also possibly come from the milling process. Some samples demonstrated better “gelling” after being heated to 40 °C for data collection, whereas other samples were unaffected (visual observation, data not shown). The S/G ratio of the corn stover and poplar samples ranged from 0.9 to 2.4. The S/G ratios of the poplar samples as determined by HSQC correlated strongly with the S/G ratios as determined by thioacidolysis (although the range for thioacidolysis was broader) and py-MBMS (Pearson correlation, HSQC/thioacidolysis = 0.84, HSQC/py-MBMS = 0.96, Additional file 2: Table S2).

Lignin unit linkages in the poplar samples as determined by HSQC provided structural information to inform bias in methodologies used to measure S/G ratios. Interestingly, β-O-4 linkages as determined by HSQC did not correlate with thioacidolysis yields (Pearson correlation = 0.11) and did not correlate strongly with lignin content as determined by py-MBMS (Pearson correlation = 0.45), indicating that the total yields of aromatic lignin units as detected from thioacidolysis and by py-MBMS was not solely dependent on the abundance of those linkages in the biomass but is complicated by the other linkages as well. Additionally, the poplar β-O-4 linkages did not strongly correlate with S-lignin unit yields from thioacidolysis (Pearson correlation = 0.40) but did for py-MBMS ions typically derived from S-lignins (Pearson correlation for most S-derived ions ~ 0.6, Additional file 2: Table S2). However, β-O-4 linkages in the poplar set did more strongly correlate with S/G ratio as determined by py-MBMS (Pearson correlation = 0.71), and to a lesser degree with S/G as determined by thioacidolysis (Pearson correlation = 0.70) and HSQC (Pearson correlation = 0.61). There was a general weakly negative correlation of poplar β-O-4 linkages with G units (Pearson correlation, HSQC/thioacidolysis = − 0.51, HSQC/G units from py-MBMS ~ − 0.5). Table 3 lists the calculated S/G and bond content results of triplicate analyses of poplar, pine, and corn stover samples.

Table 3 HSQC calculated S/G ratios and linkage content
Full size table

Solid-state NMR—Manders subtraction method

The S/G ratios of poplar samples were calculated from solid-state 13C NMR interrupted decoupling spectra as described by Manders [57]. Table 4 gives the integral values and the S/G ratios calculated using the Manders method for the poplar samples. A low, mid-range, and two high S/G ratio samples (as calculated by py-MBMS) were run in triplicate to determine consistency of the Manders method. Generally, S/G ratios were consistent over triplicate runs, with the percent error ranging from 4 to 7%. Overall, the S/G ratios calculated trend much lower than all the other methods studied thus far and had a significantly lower range of S/G ratios. The S/G ratio of the corn stover and poplar samples ranged from 0.5 to 1.1. The S/G ratios of the poplar samples as determined by ssNMR still did correlate with the S/G ratios as determined by thioacidolysis, py-MBMS or HSQC (Pearson correlation, ssNMR/thioacidolysis = 0.76, ssNMR/py-MBMS = 0.81, ssNMR/HSQC = 0.80).

Table 4 Integration values of interrupted decoupling ssNMR spectra (Manders method)
Full size table

Solid-state NMR—spectral deconvolution

Spectral deconvolution (peak-fitting) of 13C CP-MAS spectra in the aromatic domain was performed to estimate the relative abundances of S and G and lignin for twenty-two natural poplar variants and one corn stover sample. Peak-fitting 13C solid-state NMR data to quantitatively understand local molecular structure of biopolymers is a widely used practice, with many applications to biomass and other heterogeneous polymers [67, 71, 72]. Solid-state NMR profiles are generally deconvoluted into pseudo-Voigt lineshapes, meaning a weighted sum of Gaussian and Lorentzian profiles are used for a single resonance. This means any particular 13C NMR resonance has variables in peak position, amplitude, width (full-width half-max, or FWHM), and finally peak shape (Gaussian vs Lorentzian weighting factor). When deconvoluting overlapping resonances, inaccurate initial estimates of peak position, linewidth and peak shape might result in unreliable and inaccurate fits.

To identify acceptable initial fitting conditions prior to spectral deconvolution, we collected 2D 13C–13C through-space dipolar assisted rotational resonance (DARR) spectra on model 13C-enriched woody biomass (Fig. 1). Precise 13C chemical shifts were extracted from inspection of off-diagonal cross-peaks, and reasonable linewidth estimates were obtained from analysis of resolved cross-peaks. S-lignin peaks were identified from S-lignin-rich 13C-enriched hybrid poplar woody stems (Fig. 1a), while G-lignin shifts were extracted from 13C-enriched Monterey pine since softwood biomass is entirely G-lignin (Fig. 1b). We note that two signals centered at 146.5 and 148.5 could be identified in the 2D spectrum, which we use to represent G3,4 moieties generally. Since guaiacyl units lack a methoxy group at the ring-5 position and are therefore subject to carbon–carbon and carbon–oxygen condensation, a broader distribution of chemical environments is expected for G units compared to the more symmetric S units. Minor G-lignin chemical shifts in the poplar biomass were consistent with G-lignin signals in the pine sample. Peak shapes were initially set to mixed 90% Gaussian 10% Lorentzian component because sample heterogeneity will impart a Gaussian distribution of Lorentzian-like signals. However, this weighting factor was varied systematically (from 9:1 to 1:9) to help identify fitting errors. To improve these initial starting parameters, a single CP-MAS spectrum representative of the full dataset was deconvoluted such that chemical shifts were only allowed to perturb by 0.1 ppm about the shifts identified from the 2D data, and peak widths and lineshapes were allowed minor deviation from initial guesses to obtain optimal fits. Finally, with initial chemical shifts, peak widths and peak shapes all carefully estimated, batch-fitting of the entire dataset was accomplished using Python code (fitting performed with lmfit module) in which only peak amplitude was allowed to vary for each spectrum whereas peak position, Gaussian/Lorentzian ratios and FWHM were locked for all samples. Representations of resulting spectral deconvolutions for High-S (BESC-096) and Low-S (BESC-021) lignin natural poplar variants are shown in Fig. 2 (fits for all samples are provided in Supplementary Materials). S/G ratios arise directly from the relative deconvoluted peak areas of the S3,5 to G3,4 signals.

Fig. 1
figure1

Aromatic region of through-space two-dimensional 13C–13C correlation data on a 13C-enriched poplar woody stems and b 13C-enriched Monterey pine. 13C chemical shifts and approximate linewidths were extracted from the data and listed in grey and red text next to aromatic lignin unit chemical structures shown in c

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Example spectral deconvolution of 1H–13C CP-MAS data obtained from low-S (a) and high-S (b) natural poplar variants. Lignin S/G ratios were obtained from deconvoluted peak areas from lignin S3,5 and G3,4 signals located near 153 and 146–148 ppm, respectively

Full size image

When applying this fitting strategy, it became clear that small variations in the initial starting conditions had minor effects on the final observable, namely S/G ratios based on the 153/148 ppm peak areas. Since estimation of initial fitting parameters were obtained with a manual process and are therefore subject to some researcher bias, the above procedure was repeated several times. Table 5 lists the average S/G ratios obtained from repeated batch-fitting of the entire poplar and corn stover dataset using a range of different starting conditions.

Table 5 S/G ratios obtained from peak-fitting for deconvolution of ssNMR (n = 7 fitting iterations)
Full size table

Discussion

Limitations, considerations, and the impact of cell wall structure on S/G and associated methodologies

A comparison of S/G ratios determined by four different methods for the poplar biomass analyzed is provided in Fig. 3 and Additional file 1: Table S1. Generally, thioacidolysis analyses resulted in higher S/G ratios, whereas the Manders ssNMR method plateaued at 1.1. HSQC and py-MBMS data yielded similar S/G ratios for the poplar and corn stover samples. The deconvoluted ssNMR spectra provided S/G measurement improvements over the Manders method to more closely reflect the S/G values determined by HSQC and py-MBMS.

Fig. 3
figure3

Comparison of S/G ratios in corn stover and poplar measured, calculated, or predicted by thioacidolysis, py-MBMS, HSQC, ssNMR Manders method, and ssNMR spectral deconvolution. Samples are sorted for graphical viewing by listing corn stover first, and sorting poplar samples via HSQC measured S/G ratios. Error bars are provided where duplicate or triplicate sample analysis was performed

Full size image

Lignin is not evenly distributed within a plant. Past studies have shown that almost 75% of the lignin in hardwood is contained within fiber cells and only 25% of lignin is contained in vessel and ray cells [73]. Lignin concentration is also highest in the middle lamella of the fiber cells, while the secondary cell walls contain a higher total amount of lignin [21, 74]. High concentrations of G units are present in the middle lamella, which may be more condensed, containing a higher proportion of the total C–C linkages present that would not be released during thioacidolysis. Since S-type lignin tends to be dominant in the thicker, less dense secondary cell walls and would contain more β-O-4 linkages, these S units could be released more effectively. One can reasonably assume that G units may not be effectively released even at low S/G ratios. This could explain why the S/G ratio measured by thioacidolysis trends high, agreeing with previous observations regarding chemical degradation methods [23, 25, 27].

Similarly, since py-MBMS is only capable of releasing and detecting aromatic lignin units and dimers after breaking thermally labile linkages, it may be biased towards the analysis of moieties bound by β-O-4 linkages, particularly S-lignin units. If S/G ratios measured by py-MBMS were heavily impacted by and correlated with β-O-4 linkages, in addition to being positively correlated with S content, then the total lignin content estimated would also be influenced such that the higher lignin content would trend with S/G. Here, the lignin content determined by py-MBMS did not correlate strongly with S/G nor did lignin content estimates correlate strongly with thioacidolysis yields for the poplar samples or the entire biomass sets. Therefore, in addition to strong correlation with HSQC S/G, which may be less biased but is otherwise only semi-quantitative, py-MBMS S/G determined by the traditional method could be an accurate representation of S/G ratios in biomass, pending other linkage or aromatic unit anomalies not explored here that may otherwise impact the data. However, given the relatively small sample size of this data set and since the lignin values determined by py-MBMS did not consistently align with solid-state aromatic NMR spectral features, it may be necessary to interpret some of these correlations with caution.

Several factors contribute to the error associated with the S/G ratios measured by 1H–13C HSQC volume integrations. HSQC experiments are generally not quantitative due to the way the experiment is typically performed. Cross-peaks in a 1H–13C HSQC experiment arise from polarization transfer through one-bond J-coupling to correlate protons directly bonded to a carbon. While this provides quantitative information, the intensity of the cross-peaks is impacted by both heteronuclear and homonuclear coupling constants as well as T1 and T2 relaxation. A single 1H–13C HSQC experiment is generally optimized for one 1H–13C coupling constant; usually an average value of 145 Hz is chosen to capture both aromatic (~ 160 Hz) and aliphatic (~ 120 Hz) environments in an effort to optimize the number and intensity of the observed cross-peaks. Additionally, relaxation is not accounted for in the same way as 1D experiments, where a delay of 5 × T1 is employed. These delays make an HSQC experiment untenably long. The use of modern adiabatic pulse sequences mitigates most of the issues with J-coupling, but care should still be taken when using a single HSQC experiment to quantify both aromatic lignin units and inter-unit bond linkages, as the latter falls in the aliphatic region. While adiabatic HSQC pulse sequences were employed here, the experiment is considered semi-quantitative for the samples studied here, meaning only relative amounts of lignin units or linkages can be compared between samples.

13 C ssNMR analysis of lignocellulosic biomass cell walls

Solid-state NMR data were processed in two different ways (Manders et al. and spectral deconvolution or peak-fitting) to extract S/G estimates directly from the intact biomass. Results from both data processing methods trend correctly, but it appears the Manders subtraction method undercounts S/G ratio compared to spectral deconvolution. Like thioacidolysis, py-MBMS, and gel-state HSQC analyses, there are issues related to analyses of S/G by solid-state 13C NMR methods. First, broad overlapping lines and overall poor resolution of 1D 13C solid-state NMR data poses inherent challenges, especially if detailed analyses of lignin composition are desired. Second, due to the low sensitivity of NMR in general, compounded with the low (1.1%) natural abundance of 13C, a single CP-MAS experiment usually requires long acquisition times. Sample throughput cannot possibly compete with some other analytical techniques used to obtain S/G estimates. That said, with the advancement of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP)-enhanced solid-state NMR, which uses microwave irradiation to transfer spin polarization from electron radicals to nearby nuclei, it may be possible to perform these measurements in under 5 min per sample [75]. Additionally, it is widely known that routine cross-polarization NMR data is not inherently quantitative. In addition to experimental choices like magnetic field strength and rotor spinning speed, differences in cross-polarization rates (TCH), spin–lattice relaxation times (T1), and spin–lattice relaxation times in the rotating frame (T1ρ) for carbons in different chemical environments can affect their relative intensities [76, 77]. However, in our experiments, differences in CP rates can be neglected because (1) we operated at a reasonably low (50 MHz) 13C Larmor frequency and low (6900 Hz) spinning speed such that the CP condition was quite robust, and (2) the S- and G-lignin carbons of interest used for analysis (respectively, at 153 and 148 ppm) are both non-protonated quaternary aromatic carbons in similar dynamic environments. In support, identical correction factors to adjust for variations in cross-polarization kinetics were found by Davis et al. for these two signals, confirming this assessment [68]. Therefore, careful experimental setup and data analysis can ensure that reproducible S/G ratios are determined by counting all S and G units using the solid-state 13C NMR method. That said, researchers operating at higher magnetic fields and faster spinning speeds may need to take more precautions; in cases where routine ramped CP-MAS might be insufficient, the multiCP method developed by the Schmidt-Rohr lab would be an excellent approach [78].

It is clear from comparing S/G ratios determined using the Manders method with spectral deconvolution that the procedure in which the data is processed can significantly impact results. To explain the difference, we hypothesize that the method proposed by Manders of subtracting out the softwood-derived G-lignin profile from S- and G-rich hardwood spectrum is somewhat flawed. As can be seen in Fig. 1b, in softwoods there exists a minor downfield shoulder in the G-lignin spectrum near 153 ppm. Based on multiple reports in the literature [42, 70, 79,80,81] this signal can be assigned to G-lignin ring carbons at the 3, 4 and even 5 position depending on if the guaiacyl unit is or is not etherified, type of inter-unit linkage present and if carbon–oxygen condensation has occurred at the C5 position (labeled G′3,4,5 in Fig. 1b). The abundance of the G-lignin downfield shoulder near 153 ppm seen in pure-G softwoods is therefore unlikely to match the same G-lignin profile in S- and G-rich hardwoods. As a result, subtracting a G-lignin profile from hardwood 13C data could unintentionally subtract signal that is truly from S-lignin. This likely explains why S/G ratios obtained using the Manders method tend to under-represent syringyl units, while deconvolution of the same data produce S/G ratios that are consistent with HSQC and py-MBMS methods.

While promising, spectral deconvolution of 13C ssNMR data may not be broadly applicable to all biomass types. Lignin from hardwoods is predominantly S and G with low abundance of H units and p-hydroxybenzoates. Therefore, the aromatic region of the 13C NMR spectrum of hardwoods like poplar is reasonably simple making spectral deconvolution straightforward. On the other hand, corn stover is known to be rich in S and G units with an abundance of hydroxycinnamates such as ferulate (FA) and p-coumarate (pCA). The S/G ratios determined from deconvolution of the 148–153 ppm region likely overestimate guaiacyl content since FA and pCA moieties have spectral features near 147 ppm.

Similarly, some biomass types have significant representations of non-conventional aromatic lignin units derived from flavonoids (tricin), hydroxystilbenes, and acetylated lignin units, which may be shifted by 1–2 ppm compared to non-acetylated lignin units [4]. In other words, the spectral deconvolution approach demonstrated applied here may work to characterize a specific type of biomass (hardwoods are particularly promising) but care must be taken when applying across different biomass types. This concept is highlighted in our attempt to deconvolute 13C ssNMR spectrum from corn stover. A ratio between the 153 and 147 ppm regions of 0.7 to 0.8 was observed similar to py-MBMS (S/G = 0.7), but this does not match the S/G ratio of 1.1 measured from HSQC integrations or 1.3 as measured by thioacidolysis (Fig. 3). When FA content is considered, the S/(G + FA) ratios obtained from HSQC integrations (0.7, data not shown) and solid-state NMR peak-fitting analysis are consistent, confirming that G and FA content cannot be separately quantified in CP-MAS data and that the py-MBMS S/G analysis of grasses is also complicated by the presence of ferulates.

Despite these limitations, solid-state NMR methods are powerful for biomass characterization because they are rich in structural information and data is obtained on samples in their native and unaltered states. For example, in addition to S/G ratios shown here, estimates for cellulose crystallinity index and lignin composition are accessible from the same CP-MAS data [82,83,84].

In choosing a methodology for studying lignin and particularly if evaluation of S/G ratios is required, the first criterion to consider is size of the sample set. Large sample sets where reliable high-throughput data is required are suitable for py-MBMS or potentially HSQC, but not necessarily for thioacidolysis due to laborious sample preparation or for ssNMR due to limitations in equipment for handling large sample populations as well as experimental length unless DNP hardware is available. Additionally, if information beyond S/G ratios is needed, HSQC spectra can provide bond linkage information as well as other aromatic moieties present in lignin which becomes important for grassy species that are high in coumarates and ferulates. Additionally, py-MBMS could also provide lignin content estimates or thioacidolysis total aromatic lignin unit yields may also be suitable methods if those metrics are needed, although thioacidolysis has the distinct characteristic of only cleaving β-O-4 bonds and data will be biased accordingly. Py-MBMS should only compare lignin content of similar biomass types as well and comparing S/G across biomass types by py-MBMS may need to be interpreted with caution, particularly if comparing samples that may vary in the abundance of ferulates, which may produce similar pyrolysates and subsequent ions as G units. If amount of sample is limited, then non-destructive methods may offer the best alternative, although care needs be taken when employing spectral deconvolution to estimate S/G ratios and it is recommended for use only by those with experience in spectral deconvolution. Both HSQC and ssNMR provide a look at intact cell walls, and while it could be argued that the ball-milling required for HSQC may affect cell wall structure, it may be negligible so long as overheating is prevented and samples are milled consistently. Table 6 summarizes the main considerations for each methodology reported here.

Table 6 Benefits and shortcomings associated with methods used for S/G analysis reported in this work
Full size table

Conclusions

Each of the methods considered here has its advantages and disadvantages for analyzing lignin in biomass. Choosing the best method will depend on the type of biomass being studied and whether comparisons are being made within or among different biomass species. If S/G ratios are being compared within species (for example, different phenotypes of poplar), methods such as HSQC, 13C deconvoluted/peak-fit ssNMR and py-MBMS, and thioacidolysis may provide sufficient, representative, comprehensive, and accurate information for lignin analysis studies. 13C ssNMR deconvolution method for S/G analysis may not provide an accurate analysis for grass species. Comparing S/G across species (for example, grasses and hardwoods) may best be interpreted using HSQC data to take in context the lignin linkage information also captured. S/G comparisons across species are also traditionally performed using thioacidolysis and py-MBMS but if lignin linkages differ substantially, bias in S/G may be captured using these methods. This study did not identify a significant correlation between lignin S/G ratio and β-O-4 linkages across these poplar samples. The methods used for comparing the S/G ratios determined within and across different types of biomass should be carefully considered in the context of the limitations of the methods and their resulting findings relationships with other lignin structural or linkage features.

Methods and materials

Biomass

Populus trichocarpa biomass was grown as outlined in Table 7 and samples were dried and debarked, milled, destarched and extracted with ethanol/water prior to analysis [33]. Corn stover was harvested and baled in October 2017 in Story County, Iowa. Bales were stored field-side for two months until being transported and placed in covered storage. A Pinus radiata (Monterey pine) sample used to represent a predominately guaiacyl-based lignin was obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 13C-enriched hardwood (DN34 poplar) and softwood (Pinus radiata, Monterey Pine, IsoLife) samples were also used to inform spectral deconvolution method development. Samples were extracted in a Soxhlet extractor using an ethanol solution and then dried under vacuum for 12 h.

Table 7 Samples used for lignin analysis. Samples were chosen based on a range of phenotypes including S/G ratios as determined by py-MBMS
Full size table

Thioacidolysis

Thioacidolysis was performed on 2 mg of ground sample that was previously destarched and extracted, as reported in Harman-Ware et al. [18]. Samples were analyzed and yields were quantified by GC/MS using internal standard response factors built from external calibration standards of synthesized H, G and S arylglycerol species as reported in [85].

Py-MBMS

Approximately 4 mg of ground biomass samples were pyrolyzed using a Frontier PY2020 unit at 500 °C for 30 s in 80 µL deactivated stainless steel cups and analyzed in duplicate. Mass spectral data was acquired using an Extrel Super-Sonic MBMS Model Max 1000 and processed using Merlin Automation software (V3). Spectra were collected from m/z 30 to 450 at 17 eV. Lignin content was estimated in a poplar sample set relative to NIST standard 8492 Populus deltoides of known Klason lignin content and corn stover lignin content was estimated relative to a reference corn stover material of known Klason lignin content. Ion intensities m/z 120, 124 (G), 137 (G), 138 (G), 150 (ferulate and G), 152, 154 (S), 164 (G), 167 (S), 168 (S), 178 (G), 180, 181, 182 (S), 194 (S), 208 (S) and 210 (S) where G denotes primarily guaiacyl-derived ions, S denotes primarily syringyl-derived ions, where other ions derived from other aromatic lignin units or multiple sources, were mean-normalized and summed to obtain relative lignin contents. Syringyl-to-guaiacyl (S/G) ratios were estimated by dividing the sum of S-based ions by the sum of G-based ion intensities.

Whole biomass gel-state 1H–13C HSQC

Heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) NMR spectra were acquired for ball milled whole biomass samples (30–50 mg) dissolved in 500 µL DMSO-d6 and pyridine-d5 (4:1, 500 μL). Spectra were acquired at 40 °C on a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz spectrometer at 11.7 T using a room-temperature broadband probe. Spectra were acquired with 1024 points and a SW of 12 ppm in the F2 (1H) dimension and 256 points and SW of 220 ppm in the F1 (13C) dimension. The spectral processing parameters from Mansfield et al. [51] were used and integrations were performed using TopSpin 3.6. Spectra for each sample are provided in the Additional file 3: Materials.

Solid-state 13C NMR

High-resolution, solid-state 13C NMR spectra were collected at 4.7 T with cross-polarization (CP) and magic angle spinning (MAS) in a Bruker Avance 200 MHz spectrometer. Interrupted decoupling spectra were obtained with 2.0 ms of variable amplitude CP to minimize intensity variations of the non-protonated aromatic carbons that are sensitive to Hartmann-Hahn mismatch at higher MAS rotation rates [86]. 1H and 13C fields were matched at 53.6 kHz and a 1 dB ramp was applied to the proton radiofrequency (r.f.) during the matching period. Proton decoupling began 30 μs after the conclusion of CP. Simultaneous 90-degree refocusing pulses were applied to both nuclei to refocus any evolution caused by chemical shift interaction. This removed baseline distortions due to phasing errors. An additional 30 μs delay for interrupted decoupling and refocusing was then applied. Acquisition time was 0.026 s with a spectral width of 20 kHz. MAS was performed at 6900 Hz with 40,000 scans averaged using a pulse repetition rate of 1.0 s. All 13C chemical shifts were referenced externally to TMS at 0.0 ppm by setting the downfield resonance of Adamantane to 38.48 ppm. To calculate solid-state 13C NMR S/G ratios for the poplar samples, the standard pine spectrum was scaled until the intensity of the shoulder at 148 ppm was equal to the intensity of the 148 ppm shoulder in the hardwood spectrum as described by Manders [56]. The softwood spectrum was then subtracted from the poplar spectrum and the result, theoretically, is a pure S spectrum. The S spectrum is then integrated from 158 to 126 ppm and calibrated against the softwood spectrum which was integrated in the same manner and calibrated to 100. The G component was calculated by multiplying the softwood integration by the scaling factor from the subtraction. These values are then normalized to an equal number of unprotonated units on the benzene ring (divide S intensity by 4, divide G intensity by 3) before calculating the S/G ratio. We assume that intensity arising from 5–5 linkages has a negligible interference with the S/G ratio calculation due to their low abundance, 5% or less, in hardwood lignin [21, 56]. Spectral deconvolution of CP-MAS data were informed by extracting 13C chemical shifts and linewidths from two-dimensional (2D) 13C–13C dipolar assisted rotational resonance (DARR) data on 13C-enriched hardwood (DN34 Poplar) and softwood (Monterey Pine, IsoLife) samples [87]. Spectra for each sample are provided in the Additional file 4: Spectral data.

Data availability

The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan). Data are available in the manuscript and any data not provided are available upon request from the coauthors.

References

  1. 1.

    Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annual review. Plant Biology. 2003;54:519–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lee KH, Singh AP, Park BD, Wi SG, Bae HJ. Variability in the distribution of middle Lamella lignin in secondary vascular tissues of kenaf stems. IAWA Journal. 2014;35(1):61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sykes R, Kodrzycki B, Tuskan G, Foutz K, Davis M. Within tree variability of lignin composition in Populus. Wood Sci Technol. 2008;42(8):649–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    del Río JC, Rencoret J, Gutiérrez A, Elder T, Kim H, Ralph J. Lignin monomers from beyond the canonical monolignol biosynthetic pathway: another brick in the wall. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8(13):4997–5012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Beckham GT, Johnson CW, Karp EM, Salvachúa D, Vardon DR. Opportunities and challenges in biological lignin valorization. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;42:40–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Davison BH, Parks J, Davis MF, Donohoe BS. Plant cell walls: basics of structure, chemistry, accessibility and the influence on conversion. In: Aqueous Pretreatment of Plant Biomass for Biological and Chemical Conversion to Fuels and Chemicals. New York: Wiley; 2013. p. 23–38.

  7. 7.

    Chang H, Sarkanen V. Species variation in lignin: effect of species on the rate of kraft delignification. Tappi J. 1973;56:132–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Magaton AD, Colodette JL, Gouvea ADG, Gomide JL, Muguet MCD, Pedrazzi C. Eucalyptus wood quality and its impact on kraft pulp production and use. Tappi J. 2009;8(8):32–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Huntley SK, Ellis D, Gilbert M, Chapple C, Mansfield SD. Significant increases in pulping efficiency in C4H–F5H-transformed poplars: improved chemical savings and reduced environmental toxins. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(21):6178–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tsutsumi Y, Kondo R, Sakai K, Imamura H. The difference of reactivity between syringyl lignin and guaiacyl lignin in alkaline systems. Holzforschung. 1995;49(5):423–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chiang VL, Puumala RJ, Takeuchi H, Eckert RE. Comparison of softwood and hardwood kraft pulping. Tappi J. 1988;71(9):173–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Studer MH, DeMartini JD, Davis MF, Sykes RW, Davison B, Keller M, et al. Lignin content in natural Populus variants affects sugar release. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(15):6300–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Davison BH, Drescher SR, Tuskan GA, Davis MF, Nghiem NP. Variation of S/G ratio and lignin content in a Populus family influences the release of xylose by dilute acid hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2006;130(1–3):427–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ohlsson JA, Hallingbäck HR, Jebrane M, Harman-Ware AE, Shollenberger T, Decker SR, et al. Genetic variation of biomass recalcitrance in a natural Salix viminalis (L.) population. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12(1):135.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ohlsson JA, Harman-Ware AE, Sandgren M, Schnürer A. Biomass recalcitrance in willow under two biological conversion paradigms: Enzymatic hydrolysis and anaerobic digestion. BioEnergy Res. 2019.

  16. 16.

    Wagner A, Tobimatsu Y, Phillips L, Flint H, Geddes B, Lu F, et al. Syringyl lignin production in conifers: proof of concept in a Pine tracheary element system. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(19):6218.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rolando C, Monties B, Lapierre C. Thioacidolysis. In: Lin S, Dence C, editors. Methods in lignin chemistry. Springer Series in Wood Science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1992. p. 334–49.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Harman-Ware AE, Foster C, Happs RM, Doeppke C, Meunier K, Gehan J, et al. Quantitative analysis of lignin monomers by a thioacidolysis method tailored for higher-throughput analysis. Biotechnol J. 2016;11:1268–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ralph J, Grabber JH. Dimeric β-ether thioacidolysis products resulting from incomplete ether cleavage. Holzforschung. 1996;50(5):425–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lapierre C, Pollet B, Monties B, Rolando C. Thioacidolysis of spruce lignin: GC-MS analysis of the main dimers recovered after Raney nickel desulphuration. Holzforschung. 1991;45(1):61–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sjöström E. Lignin. In: Wood chemistry: fundamentals and applications. 2nd edition ed: Elsevier Science; 1993. p. 71–90.

  22. 22.

    Saito K, Watanabe Y, Shirakawa M, Matsushita Y, Imai T, Koike T, et al. Direct mapping of morphological distribution of syringyl and guaiacyl lignin in the xylem of maple by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Plant J. 2012;69(3):542–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lapierre C. Application of new methods for the investigation of lignin structure. In: Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfield RD, Ralph J, editors. Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy; 1993. p. 133–66.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li M, Foster C, Kelkar S, Pu Y, Holmes D, Ragauskas A, et al. Structural characterization of alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreated grasses exhibiting diverse lignin phenotypes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5(1):38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Grabber JH, Quideau S, Ralph J. p-Coumaroylated syringyl units in maize lignin: Implications for β-ether cleavage by thioacidolysis. Phytochemistry. 1996;43:1189–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ibarra D, Chávez MI, Rencoret J, Del Río JC, Gutiérrez A, Romero J, et al. Lignin modification during Eucalyptus globulus kraft pulping followed by totally chlorine-free bleaching: a two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared, and pyrolysis—gas chromatography/mass spectrometry study. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:3477–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sarkanen KV, Hergert HL. Classification and distribution. In: Sarkanen KV, Ludwig CH, editors. Lignins: occurrence, formation, structure and reactions. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1971. p. 43–94.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Anderson EM, Stone ML, Katahira R, Reed M, Muchero W, Ramirez KJ, et al. Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields. Nature Commun. 2019;10(1):2033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Decker SR, Harman-Ware AE, Happs RM, Wolfrum EJ, Tuskan GA, Kainer D, et al. High throughput screening technologies in biomass characterization. Front Energy Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Harman-Ware AE, Macaya-Sanz D, Abeyratne CR, Doepkke C, Haiby K, Tuskan GA, et al. Accurate determination of genotypic variance of cell wall characteristics of a Populus trichocarpa pedigree using high-throughput pyrolysis-molecular beam mass spectrometry. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-23478/v1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sykes R, Yung M, Novaes E, Kirst M, Peter G, Davis M. High-throughput screening of plant cell-wall composition using pyrolysis molecular beam mass spectroscopy. In: Mielenz JR, editor. Biofuels: methods and protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2009. p. 169–83.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Penning BW, Sykes RW, Babcock NC, Dugard CK, Klimek JF, Gamblin D, et al. Validation of pyMBMS as a high-throughput screen for lignin abundance in lignocellulosic biomass of grasses. BioEnergy Res. 2014;7(3):899–908.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Decker SR, Sykes RW, Turner GB, Lupoi JS, Doepkke C, Tucker MP, et al. High-throughput screening of recalcitrance variations in lignocellulosic biomass: total lignin, lignin monomers, and enzymatic sugar release. JoVE. 2015;103:e53163.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Choi J-W, Faix O, Meier D. Characterization of residual lignins from chemical pulps of spruce (Picea abies L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) by analytical pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Holzforschung. 2001;55(2):185–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Genuit W, Boon JJ, Faix O. Characterization of beech milled wood lignin by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-photoionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 1987;59(3):508–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yokoi H, Ishida Y, Ohtani H, Tsuge S, Sonoda T, Ona T. Characterization of within-tree variation of lignin components in Eucalyptus camaldulensis by pyrolysis-gas chromatography. Analyst. 1999;124(5):669–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rodrigues J, Meier D, Faix O, Pereira H. Determination of tree-to-tree variation in syringyl/guaiacyl ratio of Eucalyptus globulus wood lignin by analytical pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1999;48(2):121–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rodrigues J, Graça J, Pereira H. Influence of tree eccentric growth on syringyl/guaiacyl ratio in Eucalyptus globulus wood lignin assessed by analytical pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2001;58–59:481–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Evtuguin DV, Neto CP, Silva AM, Domingues PM, Amado FM, Robert D, et al. Comprehensive study on the chemical structure of dioxane lignin from plantation Eucalyptus globulus wood. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(9):4252–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Asmadi M, Kawamoto H, Saka S. The effects of combining guaiacol and syringol on their pyrolysis. Holzforschung. 2012;66(3):323–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Izumi A, Kuroda K-i. Pyrolysis-mass spectrometry analysis of dehydrogenation lignin polymers with various syringyl/guaiacyl ratios. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 1997;11(15):1709–15.

  42. 42.

    Pu Y, Hallac B, Ragauskas AJ. Plant Biomass Characterization: Application of solution and solid-state NMR spectroscopy. In: Wyman CE, editor. Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2013. p. 369–90.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ralph J, Marita JM, Ralph SA, Hatfield RD, Lu F, Ede RM, et al. Solution state NMR of lignins. In: Argyropoulos DS, editor., et al., Advances in lignocellulosics characterization. Atlanta, GA: Tappi Press; 1999. p. 55–108.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Granata A, Argyropoulos DS. 2-Chloro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaphospholane, a reagent for the accurate determination of the uncondensed and condensed phenolic moieties in lignins. J Agric Food Chem. 1995;43(6):1538–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Faix O, Argyropoulos D, Robert D, Neirinck V. Determination of hydroxyl groups in lignins: evaluation of 1H-, 13C-, 31P-NMR FTIR and wet chemical methods. Holzforschung. 1994;48(5):387–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Meng X, Crestini C, Ben H, Hao N, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ, et al. Determination of hydroxyl groups in biorefinery resources via quantitative 31P NMR spectroscopy. Nat Protoc. 2019;14(9):2627–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Argyropoulos DS. Heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy of lignins. In: Heitner C, Dimmel D, Schmidt J, editors. Lignin & lignans; advances in chemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010. p. 245–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Heikkinen S, Toikka MM, Karhunen PT, Kilpeläinen IA. Quantitative 2D HSQC (Q-HSQC) via suppression of J-dependence of polarization transfer in NMR spectroscopy: application to wood lignin. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(14):4362–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lu F, Ralph J. Non-degradative dissolution and acetylation of ball-milled plant cell walls: high-resolution solution-state NMR. Plant J. 2003;35(4):535–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ralph J, Lu F. Cryoprobe 3D NMR of acetylated ball-milled pine cell walls. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2(19):2714–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mansfield SD, Kim H, Lu F, Ralph J. Whole plant cell wall characterization using solution-state 2D NMR. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(9):1579–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Capanema EA, Balakshin MY, Kadla JF. Quantitative characterization of a hardwood milled wood lignin by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(25):9639–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Hu K, Westler WM, Markley JL. Simultaneous quantification and identification of individual chemicals in metabolite mixtures by two-dimensional extrapolated time-zero 1H–13C HSQC (HSQC0). J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(6):1662–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Cheng K, Sorek H, Zimmermann H, Wemmer DE, Pauly M. Solution-State 2D NMR Spectroscopy of plant cell walls enabled by a dimethylsulfoxide-d6/1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate solvent. Anal Chem. 2013;85(6):3213–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Villaverde JJ, Li J, Ek M, Ligero P, de Vega A. Native lignin structure of Miscanthus x giganteus and its changes during acetic and formic acid fractionation. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(14):6262–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Talebi Amiri M, Bertella S, Questell-Santiago YM, Luterbacher JS. Establishing lignin structure-upgradeability relationships using quantitative 1H–13C heteronuclear single quantum coherence nuclear magnetic resonance (HSQC-NMR) spectroscopy. Chemical Sci. 2019;10(35):8135–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Manders WF. Solid-state 13C NMR determination of the syringyl/guaiacyl ratio in hardwoods. Holzforschung. 1987;41(1):13–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    González-Vila FJ, Almendros G, del Rio JC, Martı́n F, Gutiérrez A, Romero JD. Ease of delignification assessment of wood from different Eucalyptus species by pyrolysis (TMAH)-GC/MS and CP/MAS 13C-NMR spectrometry. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1999;49(1):295–305.

  59. 59.

    Martínez AT, González AE, Valmaseda M, Dale BE, Lambregts MJ, Haw JF. Solid-state NMR studies of lignin and plant polysaccharide degradation by fungi. Holzforschung Int J Biol Chem Phys Technol Wood. 1991;45(s1):49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Hawkes GE, Smith CZ, Utley JHP, Vargas RR, Viertler H. A comparison of solution and solid state 13C NMR spectra of lignins and lignin model compounds. Holzforschung Int J Biol Chem Phys Technol Wood. 1993;47(4):302–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Fidalgo ML, Terron MC, Martinez AT, Gonzalez AE, Gonzalez-Vila FJ, Galletti GC. Comparative study of fractions from alkaline extraction of wheat straw through chemical degradation, analytical pyrolysis, and spectroscopic techniques. J Agric Food Chem. 1993;41(10):1621–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Martınez AT, Almendros G, González-Vila FJ, Fründ R. Solid-state spectroscopic analysis of lignins from several Austral hardwoods. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson. 1999;15(1):41–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Newman RH, Tauwhare SEK, Scheele S, Te Kanawa R. Leaf-fiber lignins of Phormium varieties compared by solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy. Holzforschung. 2005;59(2):147–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Foston M, Hubbell CA, Samuel R, Jung S, Fan H, Ding S-Y, et al. Chemical, ultrastructural and supramolecular analysis of tension wood in Populus tremula x alba as a model substrate for reduced recalcitrance. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4(12):4962–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Davis MF, Schroeder HR, Maciel GE. Solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance studies of wood decay. I. White rot decay of Colorado blue spruce. Holzforschung. 1994;48(2):99–105.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Davis MF, Schroeder HA, Maciel GE. Solid-state 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance studies of wood decay. II. White rot decay of paper birch. Holzforschung. 1994;48(3):186–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kang X, Kirui A, Dickwella Widanage MC, Mentink-Vigier F, Cosgrove DJ, Wang T. Lignin-polysaccharide interactions in plant secondary cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR. Nature Commun. 2019;10(1):347.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Davis MF, Schroeder HR, Maciel GE. Solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance studies of wood decay I. White rot decay of Colorado blue spruce. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Davis MF, Schroeder HA, Maciel GE. Solid-State 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Wood Decay. II. White Rot Decay of Paper Birch. Holzforschung Int J Biol Chem Phys Technol Wood. 1994;48(3):186–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Harman-Ware AE, Happs RM, Davison BH, Davis MF. The effect of coumaryl alcohol incorporation on the structure and composition of lignin dehydrogenation polymers. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):281.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Addison B, Onofrei D, Stengel D, Blass B, Brenneman B, Ayon J, et al. Spider prey-wrapping silk is an α-helical coiled-coil/β-sheet hybrid nanofiber. Chem Commun. 2018;54(76):10746–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Domján A, Bajdik J, Pintye-Hódi K. Understanding of the plasticizing effects of glycerol and PEG 400 on chitosan films using solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Macromolecules. 2009;42(13):4667–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Fergus BJ, Goring DAI. The distribution of lignin in birch wood as determined by ultraviolet microscopy. Holzforschung. 1970;24(4):118.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Donaldson LA. Lignification and lignin topochemistry—an ultrastructural view. Phytochemistry. 2001;57(6):859–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Perras FA, Luo H, Zhang X, Mosier NS, Pruski M, Abu-Omar MM. Atomic-level structure characterization of biomass pre- and post-lignin treatment by dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR. The J Phys Chem A. 2017;121(3):623–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Mehring M. Principles of high resolution NMR in solids. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1983. p. 356.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Kolodziejski W, Klinowski J. Kinetics of cross-polarization in solid-state NMR: a guide for chemists. Chem Rev. 2002;102(3):613–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Johnson RL, Schmidt-Rohr K. Quantitative solid-state 13C NMR with signal enhancement by multiple cross polarization. J Magn Reson. 2014;239:44–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Li Y, Akiyama T, Yokoyama T, Matsumoto Y. NMR assignment for diaryl ether structures (4–O–5 Structures) in pine wood lignin. Biomacromol. 2016;17(6):1921–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Yue F, Lu F, Ralph S, Ralph J. Identification of 4-O-5-units in softwood lignins via definitive lignin models and NMR. Biomacromol. 2016;17(6):1909–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Aoki D, Nomura K, Hashiura M, Imamura Y, Miyata S, Terashima N, et al. Evaluation of ring-5 structures of guaiacyl lignin in Ginkgo biloba L. using solid- and liquid-state 13C NMR difference spectroscopy. Holzforschung. 2019;73(12):1083–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Gao X, Laskar DD, Zeng J, Helms GL, Chen S. A 13C CP/MAS-based nondegradative method for lignin content analysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2015;3(1):153–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Sparrman T, Svenningsson L, Sahlin-Sjövold K, Nordstierna L, Westman G, Bernin D. A revised solid-state NMR method to assess the crystallinity of cellulose. Cellulose. 2019;26(17):8993–9003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Park S, Johnson DK, Ishizawa CI, Parilla PA, Davis MF. Measuring the crystallinity index of cellulose by solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Cellulose. 2009;16(4):641–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Yue F, Lu F, Sun R-C, Ralph J. Syntheses of lignin-derived thioacidolysis monomers and their uses as quantitation standards. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(4):922–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Peersen OB, Wu XL, Kustanovich I, Smith SO. Variable-amplitude cross-polarization MAS NMR. J Magn Reson. 1993;104(3):334–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Takegoshi K, Nakamura S, Terao T. 13C–1H dipolar-assisted rotational resonance in magic-angle spinning NMR. Chem Phys Lett. 2001;344(5):631–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Amber Hoover and Allison Ray from Idaho National Laboratory for supplying the corn stover samples used in this study. Also, thanks to Steve DiFazio for providing poplar biomass.

Funding

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO), under Award No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Funding was also provided by the BioEnergy Science Center (BESC) and the Center for Bioenergy Innovation (CBI), from the U.S. Department of Energy Bioenergy Research Centers supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science. The publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Renewable Resources and Enabling Sciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, USA

    Renee M. Happs, Bennett Addison, Crissa Doeppke & Anne E. Harman-Ware

  2. Biosciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 80401, USA

    Bryon S. Donohoe & Mark F. Davis

Authors
  1. Renee M. Happs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bennett Addison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Crissa Doeppke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bryon S. Donohoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark F. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anne E. Harman-Ware
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RMH performed experiments, wrote text, and edited manuscript. BA performed experiments, wrote text, and edited manuscript. CD performed experiments and prepared samples. BSD provided biomass, wrote text, and edited manuscript. MFD provided oversight and experimental design. AEHW performed experiments, wrote text, edited manuscript and provided oversight. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne E. Harman-Ware.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

 S/G ratios determined by different methods, thioacidolysis yields, lignin content estimates, relative lignin linkage abundances and py-MBMS spectral peak TIC-normalized intensities for each sample analyzed in this study.

Additional file 2.

Pearson correlation coefficients for various characteristics measured in the poplar samples.

Additional file 3.

Pearson correlation coefficients for various characteristics determined using all samples in this study.

Additional File 4.

2D 1H -13C HSQC spectra and 1D 13C CP MAS Interrupted Decoupling spectra with spectral deconvolution peak fitting results of biomass samples.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Happs, R.M., Addison, B., Doeppke, C. et al. Comparison of methodologies used to determine aromatic lignin unit ratios in lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 14, 58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01897-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Lignin
  • S/G ratio
  • Thioacidolysis
  • NMR
  • Pyrolysis-molecular beam mass spectrometry

Biotechnology for Biofuels

ISSN: 1754-6834

Contact us