Skip to main content

Characterization of a novel AA3_1 xylooligosaccharide dehydrogenase from Thermothelomyces myriococcoides CBS 398.93



The Carbohydrate-Active enZymes (CAZy) auxiliary activity family 3 (AA3) comprises flavin adenine dinucleotide-dependent (FAD) oxidoreductases from the glucose–methanol–choline (GMC) family, which play auxiliary roles in lignocellulose conversion. The AA3 subfamily 1 predominantly consists of cellobiose dehydrogenases (CDHs) that typically comprise a dehydrogenase domain, a cytochrome domain, and a carbohydrate-binding module from family 1 (CBM1).


In this work, an AA3_1 gene from T. myriococcoides CBS 398.93 encoding only a GMC dehydrogenase domain was expressed in Aspergillus niger. Like previously characterized CDHs, this enzyme (TmXdhA) predominantly accepts linear saccharides with β-(1 → 4) linkage and targets the hydroxyl on the reducing anomeric carbon. TmXdhA was distinguished, however, by its preferential activity towards xylooligosaccharides over cellooligosaccharides. Amino acid sequence analysis showed that TmXdhA possesses a glutamine at the substrate-binding site rather than a threonine or serine that occupies this position in previously characterized CDHs, and structural models suggest the glutamine in TmXdhA could facilitate binding to pentose sugars.


The biochemical analysis of TmXdhA revealed a catalytic preference for xylooligosaccharide substrates. The modeled structure of TmXdhA provides a reference for the screening of oxidoreductases targeting xylooligosaccharides. We anticipate TmXdhA to be a good candidate for the conversion of xylooligosaccharides to added-value chemicals by its exceptional catalytic ability.


Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundantly available biomaterial on earth and is considered an essential resource for the production of biofuels and chemicals. Lignocellulosic biomass is mainly composed of plant cell wall materials including cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin, which can be degraded by a cocktail of multiple enzymes secreted by fungi and other microbes. Such enzymes are classified in the Carbohydrate-Active enZymes (CAZy) database; among them, the redox enzymes showing auxiliary roles in lignocellulose degradation are classified in the “Auxiliary Activities” (AA) families [1]. AA families comprising carbohydrate-active enzymes include cellobiose dehydrogenases (EC, cellobiose: acceptor 1-oxidoreductase, AA3_1), glucose oxidases (EC, AA3_2), pyranose dehydrogenases (EC, AA3_2), pyranose 2-oxidases (EC, AA3_4), galactose oxidases (EC, AA5_2), oligosaccharide oxidases (EC 1.1.3.-, AA7), and lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs, ECs 1.14.99.-,, from families AA9-11 and AA13-16).

The AA3 family consists of glucose–methanol–choline (GMC) oxidoreductases with varying auxiliary activities that are divided into four subfamilies. The subfamily AA3_1 mainly consists of CDHs, which were first discovered in the 1970s in the white-rot fungi Trametes versicolor [2] and Phanerochaete chrysosporium P127-1 [3]. The CDHs accept a wide spectrum of electron acceptors including one-electron acceptors like cytochrome c, ferric-ion complexes, Cu2+; two-electron acceptors like dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP), benzoquinone (BQ), molecular oxygen, and enzymatic electron acceptors such as lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (LPMO) [4, 5]. CDHs have been shown to specifically oxidize the anomeric carbon forming the corresponding lactone through a reductive half-reaction mechanism [6]. The lactone then spontaneously hydrolyses to carboxylic acid in water. CDHs characterized to date generally show preferential activity towards β-(1 → 4)-linked cellobiose and lactose, which differ from cellobiose by the orientation of the C-4 hydroxyl at the non-reducing end [7]. CDHs from Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii CBS 191.62 (SrCDH), Trametes pubescens MB 89 (TpCDH), Trametes villosa MB 51 (TvCDH), Humicola insolens (HiCDH), and Neurospora crassa CBS 232.56 (NcCDHs) also act on xylooligosaccharides, including xylobiose and xylotriose, albeit with comparatively low catalytic efficiency relative to cellobiose [8,9,10,11]. Other oligosaccharides, including maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose, galactobiose, mannobiose, and various monosaccharides can also be accepted by some CDHs with relatively low affinity [12].

CDHs typically comprise a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) binding GMC dehydrogenase domain, an N-terminal cytochrome domain, and in some cases a C-terminal family 1 cellulose binding module (CBM1) [4]. Four classes of CDHs were identified based on the phylogenetic analysis, with class-I CDHs from basidiomycetes and the classes II, III, IV from ascomycetes with very few exceptions [13]. Depending on the presence of a CBM, the class-II CDHs are further divided into class-IIA harboring a CBM1 and class-IIB without CBM1 [14]. The cytochrome domain of CDHs is normally connected to the GMC dehydrogenase domain by a papain-sensitive amino acid linker. In some cases, the cytochrome domain can serve as a redox mediator that activates LPMOs for oxidative cellulose depolymerization [5, 15]. However, it appears that the cytochrome domain is not strictly necessary for the physiological function of all CDHs since CDHs bearing only the dehydrogenase domain are observed in all four phylogenetic classes [13].

Thermothelomyces myriococcoides CBS 389.93 (syn. Crassicarpon hotsonii, and Myriococcum thermophilum) is an ascomycete which was originated from the surface of heated compost in Switzerland [16, 17]. It encodes 17 AA3s, a typical number for fungal organisms, among which four genes are predicted to encode enzymes belonging to family AA3_1 (Gene accession code: Myrth2p4_000359, Myrth2p4_001304, Myrth2p4_007444, and Myrth2p4_005287) [18]. The Myrth2p4_000359 gene encodes only the dehydrogenase domain, and to our knowledge, no such native protein has been functionally characterized [13]. Previous studies have shown that after the proteolytic cleave of the cytochrome, the remaining CDH retains activity [11, 19, 20]. In this study, we heterologously produced the Myrth2p4_000359 protein for detailed functional characterization. The enzyme was found to preferentially oxidize xylooligosaccharides over cellobiose and other cellooligosaccharides, which has not been seen for previously characterized AA3_1s. Based on the nomenclature proposed by [21], this enzyme is named as xylooligosaccharide dehydrogenase (TmXdhA) and its corresponding gene as TmxdhA.


Selection of gene Myrth2p4_000359 and production of TmXdhA

The gene models of the genome of Thermothelomyces myriococcoides CBS 389.93 (Crassicarpon hotsonii, Myriococcum thermophilum) were functionally annotated using multiple tools and databases including InterProScan, blastp search of the CAZy and SwissProt databases, and HMMs from dbCAN database. The T. myriococcoides genome harbors genes predicted to encode 4 enzymes from family AA1 (laccases); 4 AA2s (peroxidases); 18 AA3s (flavoenzymes including four AA3_1s); 1 AA5_1 (glyoxal oxidase); 17 AA7s (oligosaccharide oxidases), and 24 LPMOs from family AA9, 3 LPMOs from family AA11, and 1 LPMO from family AA13. Three T. myriococcoides AA3_1 sequences (Myrth2p4_000359, Myrth2p4_001304 and Myrth2p4_007444) were classified as class-II and the fourth (Myrth2p4_005287) is phylogenetically distinct with other three AA3_1 genes encoded by T. myriococcoides (Fig. 1). CDH encoded by Myrth2p4_001304 (MtCDH, Uniprot: A9XK88) has been characterized previously. MtCDH comprises a cytochrome, GMC dehydrogenase and CBM1 domains, and was shown to mainly oxidize cellooligosaccharides and lactose [5, 22,23,24,25]. From the other two Class-II sequences, Myrth2p4_007444 contains both cytochrome and GMC dehydrogenase domains while Myrth2p4_000359 contains only the GMC dehydrogenase domain (Table 1). Herein, Myrth2p4_000359 (TmxdhA) was selected for recombinant production and functional characterization.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic tree built from dehydrogenase domain of AA3_1 proteins collected from CAZy and four AA3_1 proteins from T. myriococcoides CBS 389.93. Characterized proteins from CAZy are in bold font and the four proteins from T. myriococcoides are highlighted in yellow. TmXdhA characterized in this study is marked with red font. Blue dots indicate proteins with CBM1 domain and red dots indicate proteins without cytochrome domain. The details of the previously characterized AA3_1s can be found in Additional file 1

Table 1 Amino acid sequence length and domain architectures of the three class-II AA3_1 proteins from T. myriococcoides

Production of TmXdhA

TmXdhA was heterologously produced in A. niger and the recombinant production generated a glycosylated protein with electrophoretic molecular weight of approximately 140 kDa, which is nearly double that of the theoretical molecular weight (62.2 kDa) (Additional file 2: Fig. S1A). A 2D-electrophoretic analysis for the deglycosylated protein at the denatured condition revealed two separate spots (Additional file 2: Fig. S1B). Spot one had a molecular weight of about 95 kDa and a pI approximately at 4.6 while spot two showed a protein with a molecular weight of about 85 kDa and a pI approximately at 5.2 (Additional file 2: Fig. S1B). MALDI-TOF-MS analysis of tryptic peptides confirmed the production of TmXdhA (spot 2), as well as presence of a predicted hydrolase endogenous to A. niger (spot 1, UniProt: A0A370CB09). Substantial efforts to remove the hydrolase from the TmXdhA preparation were not successful. Accordingly, the hydrolytic activity was tested using five different pNP-glycosides; whereas no to negligible activity was detected on pNP-β-d-glucopyranoside, pNP-β-d-xylopyranoside and pNP-β-d-mannopyranoside, activity was detected on pNP-α-l-arabinofuranoside (0.52 U/mg) and pNP-α-d-glucopyranoside (0.12 U/mg) (Additional file 2: Table S1). The α-glucosidase activity was therefore minimized through the addition of 0.1 mM castanospermine, which did not influence the oxidoreductase activity (Additional file 2: Table S1); the low side α-arabinofuranosidase activity, however, remained.

TmXdhA oxidizes a variety of mono-, di- and oligosaccharides at the anomeric carbon

Maximum TmXdhA activity towards cellobiose, using DCIP as the electron acceptor, was measured between pH 5.0 and 6.0 (Fig. 2A), which is similar to the pH preference reported for MtCDH [25]. The highest enzyme activity at pH 5.5 was observed at 60 °C (Fig. 2B) and the half-life of TmXdhA activity at 60 °C was 1 h (Fig. 2C). The half-life at 50 °C was 7 h and TmXdhA was stable (residue activity > 90%) at 40 °C for no less than 48 h.

Fig. 2
figure 2

TmXdhA activity at different pH values at 30 °C (A), temperatures at pH 5.5 (B), and residual activity after incubation at different temperatures at pH 5.5 (C). Activity was measured on cellobiose with DCIP as the electron acceptor. Error bars represent standard deviation of three replicate reactions

Cellobiose oxidation by TmXdhA was more efficient when using BQ (9.6 ± 0.70 U/mg) rather than DCIP (5.3 ± 1.10 U/mg) as the electron acceptor. No oxidase activity of TmXdhA was detected in the coupled reaction with horseradish peroxidase and ABTS tracking the formation of hydrogen peroxide. However, TmXdhA was found to oxidize cellobiose to a small extent in a 24-h reaction without the presence of BQ and DCIP, indicating that TmXdhA is a weak oxidase (data not shown). Based on these findings, TmXdhA activity towards additional substrates was tested in 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) using BQ as the electron acceptor in 24 h reactions.

TmXdhA oxidized 18 of the 29 tested substrates, albeit it to varying degrees (Table 2). TmXdhA oxidation of glucose, galactose and mannose, reached nearly 90% after 24 h. Xylose itself could not be detected by ESI-Q-TOF-MS possibly due to the low ionization capacity of the method. Instead, TmXdhA oxidation of xylose generated xylonic acid in the deprotonated form was observed as m/z 165. Besides monosaccharides, the complete oxidation of β-(1 → 4)-linked disaccharides cellobiose, xylobiose and lactose was observed; whereas β-(1 → 4)-linked mannobiose and glucosyl-mannose were oxidized to 50% and 90%, respectively (Table 2). Trace oxidation (< 5%) of α-(1 → 4)-linked maltose was observed; however, β-(1 → 4)-linked galactobiose and chitosanbiose as well as glucodisaccharides with α/β-(1 → 2)-, α/β-(1 → 3)-, α/β-(1 → 6)-glucosidic bonds were not accepted as substrates by TmXdhA.

Table 2 Kinetic parameters of TmXdhA for cellooligosaccharides and xylooligosaccharides

Longer cello- and xylo-oligosaccharides, including cellotriose, cellotetraose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, and acidic oligosaccharide 23-(4-O-methyl-α-d-glucuronyl)-xylotriose (U4m2XX) were fully oxidized by TmXdhA; TmXdhA also partially (80%) oxidized 32-β-d-glucosyl-cellobiose after 24 h. By contrast, oxidation of 22-(4-O-methyl-α-d-glucuronyl)-xylobiose (U4m2X) was not detected. When testing TmXdhA activity on arabinofuranosyl (Araf) substituted xylooligosaccharides, 32-α-l-arabinofuranosyl-xylobiose (A3X) and 23-α-l-arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A2XX), the residual α-arabinofuranosidase activity completely hydrolysed A3X and A2XX during the long 24-h treatment. During shorter 3-h incubation, TmXdhA was found to only oxidize A2XX and no oxidation of A3X was detected (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). TmXdhA did not show any activity on C-1 methylated cellobiose and lactose.

Because the oxidized products were analyzed by ESI-Q-TOF-MS in negative mode, oxidation at the reducing anomeric center would be negatively charged and detected in their anionic form [M-H]; while neutral substrates would be detected as chlorine adducts [M + Cl]. Thus, oxidation at the anomeric center is equivalent to a 20 Dalton (Da) decrease relative to the substrate. Herein, the tested hexoses with mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 215 generated products with m/z of 195, consistent with oxidation at the reducing anomeric center (Table 2). Similarly, a loss of m/z 20 was detected for all oxidized neutral substrates. The acidic substrates U4m2X and U4m2XX carrying Methyl-α-D-Glucuronyl group were detected as deprotonized forms [M–H] with peaks at m/z 471 and m/z 603, respectively. The oxidation of U4m2XX introduced a second carboxylic acid at the reducing end, hence, the oxidized U4m2XX can be both single charged [M–H] and doubly charged [M–2H]2 and was detected as peaks at m/z 619 and m/z 309, respectively.

Fragmentation of oxidized oligosaccharides by ESI-Q-TOF-MS/MS confirmed that the substrates were oxidized solely at their anomeric center (Fig. 3). Results from cellobiose and U4m2XX are shown as examples. With cellobiose (Fig. 3A), Y-ion and Z-ions from glycosidic bond cleavage were the most abundant fragment ions. The fragmentation for the oxidized U4m2XX resulted Y-ion, Z-ion, and B-ions (Fig. 3B). In both cases, the molecular masses for Y1- and Z1-ions increased by 16 Da, compared to the unoxidized control sample, supporting that the oxidation reaction occurred in the reducing glycoside and the formation of C-1 carboxylic acid.

Fig. 3
figure 3

MS and MS/MS spectra collected in negative ion mode showing the ionization and fragmentation of cellobiose (A) and 23-(4-O-methyl-α-D-glucuronyl)-xylotriose (U4m2XX) (B) after oxidation by TmXdhA. A1. Negative MS spectra of solely cellobiose, A2. Negative MS spectra of the reaction products from TmXdhA cellobiose reaction, and A3. MS/MS 357 of TmXdhA oxidized cellobiose. B1. MS spectra of U4m2XX, B2. MS spectra of TmXdhA U4m2XX reaction products, B3. MS/MS 619 of TmXdhA oxidized U4m2XX, and B4. MS/MS 309 of TmXdhA oxidized U4m2XX

TmXdhA prefers xylooligosaccharide substrates

TmXdhA oxidized the cellooligosaccharides and xylooligosaccharides with the specific activities between 8.4 and 11 U/mg (Fig. 4). The specific activity for TmXdhA towards xylotriose (10.8 ± 0.9 U/mg) is statistically higher than the specific activity towards xylobiose (9.0 ± 0.3 U/mg) and cellotriose (8.4 ± 0.3 U/mg); whereas activity towards xylotriose was not significantly different from activities on cellobiose and cellotetraose (9.6 ± 0.7 U/mg and 10.4 ± 1.5 U/mg, respectively). TmXdhA oxidized lactose (8.4 ± 1.2 U/mg) and U4m2XX (9.6 ± 0.9 U/mg) in the similar level compared to the cello- and xylo-oligosaccharides; while significantly lower activity was found towards glucosyl-(1 → 3)-β-d-cellobiose (3.1 ± 0.3 U/mg) and glucosyl-(1 → 4)-β-d-mannose (6.0 ± 1.0 U/mg). Though mannobiose, glucose, galactose, and mannose were oxidized in the 24 h reaction, no quantifiable activity was detected towards mannobiose, glucose, galactose, and mannose during the initial velocity measurement.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Specific activity of TmXdhA towards different substrates (n = 3). No activity was detected for mannobiose (Man2), glucose (Glc), galactose (Gal), and mannose (Man). Error bars represent standard deviation of three replicate reactions. Significance in activities (p < 0.05) is shown by different lowercase letters (a-d). Cellobiose, C2; cellotriose, C3; cellotetraose, C4; xylobiose, X2; xylotriose, X3; xylotetraose, X4; lactose, Lac; 23-(4-O-methyl-α-d-glucuronyl)-xylotriose, UXX; Glucosyl-(1 → 4)-β-D-mannose, GlcMan Glucosyl-(1 → 3)-β-d-cellobiose, Glc-C2

Kinetic analyses revealed the high catalytic efficiency of TmXdhA towards xylooligosaccharides, mainly driven by the comparatively low KM of TmXdhA towards the xylooligosaccharide substrates (Table 3). Overall, TmXdhA had higher binding affinity for xylooligosaccharides than cellooligosaccharides, with 3–5 times smaller KM values on the xylooligosaccharides than for the cellooligosaccharides. Increased values in kcat were observed with the increasing length of both cello- and xylo-oligosaccharides, and the KM values for oxidation of cellooligosaccharides followed the same pattern. On the contrary, the highest affinity of TmXdhA was towards xylotriose (0.11 mM) compared to xylobiose (0.16 mM) and xylotetraose (0.13 mM). Notably, the catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) showed that xylotriose and xylotetraose are the most favorable and, cellotriose the least favorable of the tested substrates.

Table 3 Oxidation of mono-, di- and oligosaccharides by TmXdhA after 24 h with product detection by ESI-Q-TOF-MS in the negative mode

Consistent with the kinetic analysis, product formation followed by both quantitative HILIC-ELSD and semi-quantitative MS method indicated little impact of degree of polymerization on TmXdhA activity towards cellooligosaccharides and xylooligosaccharides (Fig. 5). Overall, all tested oligosaccharides were found to be oxidized in similar speed and be fully converted to corresponding aldonic acids after 24 h. The HILIC-ELSD method to track the formation of oxidized carbohydrates is time-consuming and requires complex pre-treatment of reaction mixtures prior to their analysis. Semi-quantitative MS method was applied here as an alternative method for the identification and semi-quantification of the oxidized carbohydrates. The MS method is simpler and faster than HILIC-ELSD, however it slightly overestimates the formed products compared to HILIC-ELSD. The difference in percentage were most apparent at the 7-h time point, where the conversion for cello-series was 30–50% and for xylo-series was 40–50% detected with HILIC-ELSD and the corresponding oxidation percentage calculated based on MS data were 55–70% and 60–70%, respectively (Fig. 5). Based on this comparison, the results from HILIC-ELSD are included in the Additional file 2 (Fig. S5) for the following reactions and only the results from the MS method are discussed further.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Product formation and substrate depletion by TmXdhA. Reactions with cellobiose (C2), cellotriose (C3), and cellotetraose (C4) followed with MS (A) and with HILIC-ELSD (B). Reactions with xylobiose (X2), xylotriose (X3), and xylotetraose (X4) followed with MS (C) and with HILIC-ELSD (D). HILIC-ELSD results show the decrease of the substrate with dashed line and formation of the reaction product with continuous line. Error bars represent standard deviation of three replicate reactions

The impact of degree of polymerization was revealed when TmXdhA activity was tested on separate mixtures of xylooligosaccharides and cellooligosaccharides (Fig. 6). In this case, cellotetraose and xylotetraose were oxidized faster compared to the corresponding shorter oligosaccharides (Fig. 6A, B). Still, when testing TmXdhA on oligosaccharide mixtures comprising both xylooligosaccharides and cellooligosaccharides, TmXdhA preference towards xylooligosaccharides over the cellooligosaccharides was observed regardless of the degree of polymerization (Fig. 6C–E).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Product formation during TmXdhA oxidation of cellooligosaccharide and xylooligosaccharide mixtures followed by the MS method. Reactions contained following oligosaccharides as substrates: cellobiose (C2), cellotriose (C3), and cellotetraose (C4). (A); xylobiose (X2), xylotriose (X3), and xylotetraose (X4) (B); xylobiose, cellobiose, and xylotetraose (C); xylotriose, cellotriose, and cellotetraose (D); and xylotriose, xylotetraose, and cellotetraose (E). Error bars represent standard deviation of three replicate reactions

Structural features of the TmXdhA model

Using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis, the TmXdhA sequence shared the highest sequence identity to two structurally and biochemically characterized CDHs, MtCDH from the same organism T. myriococcoides CBS 208.89 (PDB code 4QI4) and a CDH from Neurospora crassa CBS 232.56 (NcCDH, PDB code 4QI7), 63% and 62%, respectively. By aligning the sequences of TmXdhA and all other CAZy AA3_1s, especially the key residues involved in the substrate binding and catalysis defined in [5], a glutamine residue is found at position 406, other than the threonine residue at the same place for MtCDH and NcCDH (Fig. 7A). The position 406 is found to be conserved with polar amino acid residues, including threonine, serine, and glutamine, with glutamine as the least abundant one within all CAZy AA3_1 sequences (Fig. 7B).

Fig. 7
figure 7

A Alignment of TmXdhA with two structurally characterized CDHs. NcCDH: cellobiose dehydrogenase from N. crassa (PDB code 4QI7); MtCDH: cellobiose dehydrogenase from T. myriococcoides (PDB code 4QI4, strain CBS 208.89). The catalytically important amino acids are highlighted by red boxes. The only difference is highlighted with green triangle. B Sequence logos of the residues around 406Q from all CAZy AA3_1 sequences and TmXdhA

In an effort to predict sequence and structural determinants of AA3_1 activity towards xylooligosaccharides, the structure prediction of TmXdhA was created using AlphaFold2, which is suggested to be a highly accurate protein structure predictor [26]. Most of the residues were modeled at with the per-residue confidence (pLDDT) score higher than 90 and the predicted aligned error (PAE) lower than 5 (Additional file 2: Fig. S6). The predicted TmXdhA structure possesses an architecture with an active-site pocket and it folds in the same way as the MtCDH structure, while MtCDH has an extra CBM domain at the C-terminus (Fig. 8A, B). The catalytic histidine residue is located at position 504 for TmXdhA that is considered to be the proton acceptor according to the alignment. Previous results have shown that the polar threonine residue in MtCDH forms a water-mediated hydrogen bond systems that hold the C-6 of the reducing motif of cellobionolactam (CBLM) in its position [5]. Instead, TmXdhA possesses a longer glutamine residue (Q406) at the same position, which limits the space between the water molecule and OE1 of Q406 to only 1.4 Å.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Structural comparison of TmXdhA predicted model and MtCDH (PDB code 4QI4). A The predicted structure of TmXdhA created with AlphaFold2, the surface of active site is colored in red. B Superimposition of TmXdhA predicted model structure with structure of the dehydrogenase domain of MtCDH (PDB code 4QI4), the structure of MtCDH is shown in light yellow color and the structure of TmXdhA is shown in gray. C Alignment for the active site of TmXdhA (white), substrate free MtCDH (yellow), and MtCDH-cellobionolactam (Blue, PDB code 4QI5). The asterisk marks the position that corresponds to the hydroxyl being abstracted by CDHs in cellobiose. D Alignment for the reducing end moiety C-6 binding site of the TmXdhA (white) and MtCDH -CBLM complex (blue). The water molecular mediating the hydrogen bond (yellow dash line) system is shown as red sphere. The distance between the OE1 of Q406 and the water molecule is shown as red dash line


CAZy AA3_1 enzymes, mainly CDHs, have been extensively studied over the past decades and have the potential to be used in wide variety of applications including biosensors, biomedical applications, functionalization of partially degraded cellulose and hemicelluloses, and enhancing lignocellulose degradation [12, 19, 27,28,29].

Many fungi possess paralogous genes that could express multiple isoenzymes within the same family or subfamily. Such feature is called multigenicity. In the four subfamilies of AA3s, multigenicity is most observed in AA3_2 subfamily and least observed in the AA3_1 subfamily [30]. The isoenzymes from AA3_2 could differ completely in their transcription and secretion level [11, 31], and may vary in their ability to utilize different electron acceptors and substrates [32, 33]. So far investigated kinetic parameter support the multigenicity of T. myriococcoides AA3_1 proteins to assist in adapting habitat with diverse substrate availability. MtCDH exhibits ten times lower KM towards cellobiose, cellotriose and cellotetraose (0.03–0.06 mM) compared to TmXdhA (0.36–0.53 mM) [23]. Although MtCDH reportedly oxidized xylooligosaccharides (DP1-6), kinetic parameters for the MtCDH on xylooligosaccharides have not been published [22].

Consistent with the previously characterized AA3_1 CDHs, the β-(1 → 4)-linkage resulting the linear substrate structure is important for substrate acceptance by TmXdhA [7]. Though the activity is only towards reducing end C-1, TmXdhA activity is diminished on trisaccharide substrates where the non-reducing neutral or acidic sugar residue links to penultimate residue via linkages other than β-(1 → 4) (e.g., as in the case of A3X, U4m2X, and glucosyl-β-(1 → 3)-cellobiose). Similar to MtCDH and PcCDH from P. chrysosporium K3, the equatorial position of the C-4 hydroxyl group and unoccupied equatorial position of the C-2 hydroxyl group are important for TmXdhA activity [5, 6].

AA3_1 enzymes clearly vary in their ability to oxidize xylooligosaccharides. For instance, the PcCDH from Basidiomycota was found to primarily accept cellobiose, but could not oxidize xylobiose, xylotriose, or Glc-Glc-Xyl, Xyl-Glc-Xyl, and Glc-Xyl-Xyl [34], while xylobiose was oxidized by NcCDHs and HiCDHs from Ascomycota, the catalytic efficiency was 50 to 2500 times lower than that towards cellobiose [10, 11]. By contrast, the affinity and the catalytic efficiency for TmXdhA towards xylobiose, xylotriose and xylotetraose was more than ten times higher compared to all previous characterized CDHs [12]. The preferential xylooligosaccharide oxidizing feature of TmXdhA is unique compared to other characterized AA3_1 CDHs. Some C1 acting AA7 oligosaccharide oxidases have also been reported to act on xylooligosaccharides and the AA7 oxidase from Myceliophthora thermophile C1 was observed to exhibits a strong substrate preference toward xylooligosaccharides. However, this AA7 xylooligosaccharide oxidase has ten times lower catalytic efficiency towards xylooligosaccharides compared to TmXdhA [35]. Instead, the AA7 oligosaccharide oxidase from Sarocladium strictum T1 possess catalytic efficiency in the same magnitude towards xylooligosaccharides as TmXdhA, but does not have a preference towards xylooligosaccharides and oxidizes cellooligosaccharide with similar efficiency [36]. This feature of TmXdhA can be used in biosensors for lower detection limit of xylooligosaccharides, generate xylan-based aldonic acid, and selective removal of xylan fractions from lignocellulosic materials.

TmXdhA differs with MtCDH and NcCDH in one residue in the substrate-binding domain on sequence level (T406/Q406). The threonine for MtCDH will generate a hydrogen bond system for the locking of the C-6 of the reducing end moiety into the substrate-binding site [5]. However, based on the TmXdhA model, the space between the water molecule and OE1 of Q406 in TmXdhA is limited (1.4 Å). Hence, a new hydrogen bond system to promote the binding towards pento-pyranosidic moiety is expected. These results open up possibility to find new xylooligosaccharide active enzymes from the uncharacterized CAZymes and to engineer CDHs for better xylooligosaccharide oxidation performance. The predicted model of TmXdhA has similar structure compared to other CDHs and glucose oxidases, with a conserved histidine (H504) residue positioned next to the flavin ring. Such structure facilitates the reductive half-reaction, where the histidine abstracts the proton from the hydroxyl on the anomeric carbon (C-1) while the hydrogen from C-1 transfers to the FAD as hydride [6]. Our attempt failed in redirecting the TmXdhA oxidation to positions other than reducing end C-1 blocking the reducing end by methylation.

In our study, the TmXdhA had better affinity and catalytic efficiency towards higher oligosaccharides and oxidized xylotriose and xylotetraose three to six times quicker than xylobiose in oligosaccharide mixtures, suggesting novel binding site within the catalytic domain for the third xylosidic moiety. The kinetic parameters do not always follow to the real substrate preference in an oligosaccharide mixture as shown in our study. Giving xylooligosaccharides as an example, the KM increased by 50% from cellobiose to cellotetraose while the catalytic efficiency was about the same for cellobiose, cellotriose and cellotetraose. Nevertheless, we found that cellotetraose is the preferred substrate compared to cellobiose and cellotriose in a cellooligosaccharide mixture. Such inconsistency could be caused by the inhibition effect of the formed aldonic acids.

TmXdhA represents a unique type of AA3_1 protein containing only a dehydrogenase domain, it lacks the cytochrome and CBM domains of other characterized AA3_1 members [11, 19, 20]. Analyses of AA3_1 sequences have shown cdhs lacking cytochrome domain and CBM, yet no such native enzyme has been functionally characterized. The direct electron transfer from CDH to LPMO was previously shown to be mediated by the cytochrome domain of some CDHs [5]. More recently, the FAD domain of MtCDH was found to mediate electron transfer to an LPMO [20], consistent with the potential of other single domain flavoenzymes such as AA3_2 glucose dehydrogenase, AA3_2 aryl alcohol oxidases, and AA7 oligosaccharide oxidases to mediate electron transfer to LPMOs [37, 38]. Hence, it would be worth testing in the future how single domain enzyme TmXdhA cooperate with LPMOs.


In summary, this work recombinantly expressed and biochemically characterized a dehydrogenase domain only AA3_1 enzyme (TmXdhA) for the first time. TmXdhA was found to have unique preferential activity towards xylooligosaccharides, which is the first xylooligosaccharide dehydrogenase discovered in the AA3_1 family. Additionally, TmXdhA oxidized longer oligosaccharides quicker than disaccharides in oligosaccharide mixtures, suggesting TmXdhA could be xylan targeting and is thus a good candidate for xylooligosaccharide targeting applications. The structure prediction suggests that Q406 promotes the binding between TmXdhA and the xylo-pyranosyl reducing end moiety.



All buffering chemicals and substrates including glucose, xylose, mannose, galactose, cellobiose, lactose, mannobiose, β-(1 → 4)-D-galactobiose, isomaltose and maltose were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). The other substrates including cellotriose, cellotetraose, xylobiose, xylotriose, xylotetraose, 32-α-l-arabinofuranosyl-xylobiose (A3X), 23-α-l-arabinofuranosyl-xylotriose (A2XX), 22-(4-O-methyl-α-d-glucuronyl)-xylobiose (U4m2X), 23-(4-O-methyl-α-d-glucuronyl)-xylotriose (U4m2XX), chitosanbiose, 32-β-d-glucosyl-cellobiose, β-(1 → 4)-D-glucosyl-D-mannose, gentiobiose, kojibiose, sophorose, laminaribiose, and nigerose were purchased from Megazyme (Ireland). The laccase from T. versicolor (38429, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was used in oxidation reactions to recycle the electron acceptor, 1,4-benzoquinone (BQ, PHR1028, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Methylated cellobiose and lactose was produced in house (details in Additional File 2).

Phylogenetic analysis

To detect proteins of T. myriococcoides CBS 389.93 from the Auxiliary Activity families of interest, an hmm-scan search with default cut-off values (if alignment > 80aa, use E-value < 1e−5, otherwise use E-value < 1e−3; covered fraction of HMM > 0.3) were performed against all proteins of this organism using HMMs from dbCANv9 database. The protein sequences were retrieved from the Centre of Structural and Functional Genomics at Concordia University [18]. The result from hmm-scan was combined with the best hits from blastp search against all sequences from CAZy database [39] (Additional file 3).

To build the phylogenetic tree of AA3_1 proteins, 206 protein sequences from this subfamily were retrieved from CAZy. Among those, 14 were reported as experimentally characterized. Four AA3_1 proteins of T. myriococcoides CBS 389.93 found from the hmm-scan and blastp searches were added to this AA3_1 dataset. The multiple sequence alignment profile was created using MUSCLE [40] and the trimming was described by [13]. CBM1 and cytochrome domain information marked on the tree were obtained from the pfam scan against Pfam database v34. The tree was then constructed and edited using FastTree [41] and iTOL [42].

RNA extraction, cloning of xdhA and recombinant protein production

TmXdhA coding DNA sequence was obtained from the T. myriococcoides CBS 398.93 genome portal [18, 43]. The strain was grown on YpSs agar medium for three days at 45 °C at a shaking speed of 220 rpm [44]. Ten plugs from the mycelium grown on agar were used to inoculate a primary culture of 50 ml liquid mycological broth (MB) (1% soytone, 0.4% D-glucose, trace elements, pH 5). Trametes defined medium (TDM) containing 2% of a mix of alfalfa and barley was used for the main culture with an inoculum of 10% volume from the primary culture [44]. Mycelia was harvested after 24 h of incubation at 45 °C at a shaking speed of 220 rpm and was grinded into powder as described by [44, 45]. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy® Plant Maxi Kit (Qiagen) and complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the Superscript™ III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to instructions from manufacturers.

For cloning, TmxdhA gene was amplified from cDNA by PCR using Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England BioLabs Inc.) The following forward and reverse primers were used: 5ʹ-CCCCAGCAACAAAACACCGGCTCAGCAATGCAAACTGCTTCGAAATTAGC-3ʹ and 5ʹ- GAAGGACGGCGACGGACGGCTTCACGATTCCGCATCCTC-3ʹ. Ligation-independent cloning (LIC) method [46] was used to clone the gene into the LIC-adapted vector pGBFIN49, in which the gene is flanked by 1972 bp of the Aspergillus niger glucoamylase A (glaA) promoter and 701 bp of the A. nidulans trpC terminator.

CRISPR-Cas9 technology was used to replace the glaA gene with the TmxdhA gene into the genome of the engineered A. niger strain CSFG_9057 (FGSC #A1513 ∆pyrG ∆kusA ∆[prtT amyC agdA] ∆bglA ∆laeA ΔglaATt::trpCTt). Geneious software was used to select the 20-bp guide RNA sequence targeting the glaA gene. The guide RNA sequence was cloned into ANEp8-Cas9 as described by [47]. The expression vector containing the TmxdhA gene was co-transformed into CSFG_9057 strain with the ANEp8-Cas9 plasmid containing the glaA-targeting guide RNA sequence using protoplast-mediated transformation method [48]. Transformants were selected on minimal medium without uracil and uridine [49]. Supernatants from transformants were screened for recombinant protein production after growth in MMJ medium supplemented with 0.1% arginine and containing 15 g/l of maltose for induction of protein production [50].

Spores from transformant producing the TmXdhA recombinant protein were inoculated in 500 ml MMJ medium supplemented 0.1% arginine at a concentration of 2 × 106 conidia/ml. Supernatant was harvested after six days of stationary incubation at 30 °C. Desalting and concentration of the supernatant was done using Vivaflow® cassette as described in the manufacturer’s protocol (Sartorius). Protein production and concentration were checked on SDS-PAGE gel using standard techniques [51].

Purification of the recombinant protein

The secreted recombinant protein was first concentrated to smaller volume using centrifuge filter with a cut-off of 10 kDa. Afterwards, the concentrated fraction was filtrated through 0.45 µm filter and purified with Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC, HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg column, GE healthcare, USA) in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 5) with 0.15 M sodium chloride. The protein purity was checked with SDS-PAGE for each fraction. Semi-purified fractions of TmXdhA were pooled and loaded to the SEC again for a second round of purification. After that, the purified fractions of TmXdhA were pooled and exchanged to 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5) and concentrated using 30-kDA cut-off Vivaspin 20 spin columns (Sartorius, Germany). The final protein concentration was measured using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) and the purified protein was snap-frozen and stored in -80 °C in aliquots.

Confirmation of protein purity by deglycosylation, 2-D electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF-MS

The purified protein was treated with PNGaseF (New England Biolabs, USA) at both denaturing and native conditions at 37 °C for 4 h. The samples before and after deglycosylation at both denaturing and native conditions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, the specific activity of the purified enzyme that was deglycosylated under native condition was also analyzed to evaluate the impact of glycosylation. Subsequently, the purified enzyme was analyzed by 2-D electrophoresis using pH 3–10 strip and Criterion TGX- 4–20% gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). The spots from 2D gel were cut, destained, digested with trypsin, and then subjected to MALDI-TOF-MS. Proteins were identified by correlating the mass spectra to the A. niger protein database from Uniprot and the TmxdhA sequence.

Enzymatic assays

To select the optimal pH for TmXdhA oxidation reactions, the activity of TmXdhA was screened at 30 °C with 5 mM cellobiose and 1 mM 2,6-Dichloroindophenol (DCIP, D1878, Sigma-Aldrich) in McIlvaine’s buffer at pH values from 3.0 to 7.5. The activity was also followed at temperature ranging from 10 to 70 °C with 5 mM cellobiose and DCIP BQ in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) to determine effect of temperature on TmXdhA activity. The thermostability of TmXdhA was determined by measuring its residue activity at 30 °C in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) after incubation at different temperatures (40, 50, 60 °C) in a concentration of 50 µg/ml for up to 48 h.

The activity of TmXdhA was also analyzed at 30 °C with 5 mM cellobiose and 1 mM BQ in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) to investigate the influence of volatile buffer and e-acceptor. Reduction of DCIP (ε520 = 7.8 mM−1 cm−1) and BQ (ε290 = 2.24 mM−1 cm−1) was followed using an Eon plate reader (BioTek, USA). All reactions were performed in triplicates. The oxidase activity of TmXdhA was measured by following the formation of hydrogen peroxide in a coupled reaction between horseradish peroxidase and ABTS (ε420 = 36 mM−1 cm−1) [52].

Spectrophotometric assays to determine the initial activity were carried out towards glucose and the di- and oligosaccharides that were oxidized after 24 h incubation. Reactions (250 µl) were performed at 30 °C in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) with 5 mM substrate and 1 mM BQ, and the reduction of the BQ was measured for up to 40 min.

Steady-state kinetic constants for cellobiose, cellotriose, cellotetraose, xylobiose, xylotriose, and xylotetraose were measured using the conditions for initial activity determination. The reduction rate of BQ was plotted versus substrate concentration (8 points, from 0 to 5 mM). The Michaelis–Menten constant (KM) was estimated by fitting of the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, USA). The measurements were followed using an Eon plate reader (BioTek, USA). All reactions were performed in triplicates.

The hydrolytic activity was tested on five different pNP-sugars. Each reaction mixture contained 2.5 mM substrate in 25 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5). 1 µg of TmXdhA was added in each reaction. Reactions were terminated after 20 min incubation at 30 °C by adding equal volume of 1 M Na2CO3. The activity was determined by measuring pNP release at 405 nm and calculated with pNP standards.

Laccase activity was measured using 5 mM hydroquinone (HQ, H9003, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), and oxidation of HQ (ε249 = 17.25 mM−1 cm−1) in 250 μl reaction was followed.

Substrate screening and identification of reaction products with ESI-Q-TOF-MS

The substrate specificity of TmXdhA was determined by using 29 different carbohydrates (Table 2) including monosaccharides, glucosidic-disaccharides with different glucosidic linkages, β-(1 → 4)-linked disaccharides, cello-/xylo-oligosaccharides, and C-1 methylated cellobiose and lactose. All reactions (125 µL total reaction volume) were performed at 30 °C with shaking (400 rpm) in 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) containing 25 mU TmXdhA, 5 mM sugar substrate, 1 mM BQ as e-acceptor, and 25 mU T.versicolor laccase for the regeneration of BQ. For the reactions with α-glucosidic-disaccharides, 0.1 mM castanospermine (532,673, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was included to inhibit the hydrolytic side activity [53]. Oxygen availability was not controlled during the reactions. The sampling (50 µL) was done at 3 h for the reaction mixtures containing A3X and A2XX and at 24 h for all other reactions.

Reactions were stopped after sampling by filter through 10-kDa cut-off Vivaspin 500 spin columns (Sartorius, Germany). Mass spectrometric analysis was then done for checking if the substrates were oxidized by TmXdhA and to identify the reaction products using Quadruple Time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometry with an ESI source (SYNAPT G2-Si, Waters, MA, USA). In practice, a 5 μl sample from each reaction was mixed with 5 μl of 10 mg/ml ammonium chloride and 500 μl 50% methanol in water prior introducing to the ESI-Q-TOF-MS. The analysis was done in negative mode and the ions were collected in m/z range of 50 to 1200 with the parameters developed by [54]. Fragmentation analysis was done to ions generated from oxidized products to identify the reaction products.

Enzymatic conversion of cellooligosaccharide and xylooligosaccharide series

The efficiency of TmXdhA for oxidizing cello- and xylo-oligosaccharides was compared individually and in mixtures. The reactions (250 µL) were performed at 30 °C in 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) with shaking (400 rpm) using 0.2 mM BQ as an e-acceptor in triplicates. For the reactions on each substrate individually, 1.25 mU TmXdhA and 3.75 mU T. versicolor laccase were added to convert 5 mM substrate. For the conversions of oligosaccharide mixtures, the enzyme dose to molarity of reducing end ratio was kept the same, with 3.75 mU of TmXdhA and 11.25 mU of laccase added to convert a mixture of three oligosaccharides in equal molarity (5 mM each). Five series were studied, including cellooligosaccharide series with cellobiose, cellotriose, and cellotetraose and xylooligosaccharide series with xylobiose, xylotriose, and xylotetraose. The three other series mixed cello- and xylo-oligosaccharides with combinations of xylotriose, xylotetraose, and cellotetraose; xylotriose, cellotriose, and cellotetraose; and xylobiose, cellobiose, and xylotetraose.

Time course sampling (50 µL) was done at 1, 3, 7, and 24 h. The oxygen level was not controlled. Reactions were stopped by adding 200 µL 0.1 M ammonia solution directly after sampling and filtering through 10 kDa centrifuge filter. The flow through were lyophilized and redissolved in 50% ACN. The samples were kept frozen at − 80 °C prior to further analysis by mass spectrometry and HILIC-ELSD.

Semi-quantitative analysis by mass spectra

5 μL sample solution from each time point was mixed with 5 μl of 10 mg/ml ammonium chloride and 500 μl 50% methanol in water before introducing to ESI-Q-TOF-MS. Ions were analyzed in negative mode and collected in m/z range of 50 to 1200. The oxidized substrates were deprotonized and the original substrates presented as chloride adducts. The following equation was used d to estimate the extent of oxidation completeness employing the relative ratio in peak height between the non-oxidized substrate and the formed product:

$$\mathrm{Oxidation completeness}=\frac{\mathrm{Abundance of isotopic}\, m/z \,\mathrm{for oxidized substrate}}{\mathrm{Abundance of isotopic }\,m/z\,\mathrm{ for oxidized subatrate }+\mathrm{ abundance of isotopic }\,m/z\,\mathrm{ for original substrate}}.$$

Quantification of oxidized products by HILIC-ELSD

The depletion of substrates and formation of the corresponding aldonic acids were followed using an Acquity UPLC coupled with evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD). A 1.7 μm, 2.1*150 mm Acquity UPLC BEH Amide column (HILIC amide, Waters, MA, USA) was used to separate the reaction products. The elution gradient and instrument settings were according to [54]. External standard series with cello- and xylo-oligosaccharides, and their corresponding aldonic acids were made by injecting 200 ng to 1500 ng of each compound. The injection volume for the samples varied so that the injection amount of each substrate and its reactions product fall in the quantification range. Each standard curve was fitted to a quadratic polynomial equation of f(x) = ax2 + bx + c, where f(x) is the peak area, x is the sample amount.

The aldonic acids were made in-house using wild-type glucooligosaccharide oxidase (GOOX) from S. strictum [36]. The GOOX activity was determined according to [55]. For aldonic acids production, 13.5 mg/mL substrate was oxidized for 24 h at 37 °C in 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) by 400 mU/mL GOOX. Catalase from bovine liver (1200 mU/mL, C30, Sigma, Germany) was also included to remove the formed hydrogen peroxide. The reaction mixtures after 24-h incubation were filtered through 10 kDA centrifugal filters and lyophilized to dryness to recover the aldonic acids. The pure aldonic acids were redissolved to proper dilution series with 50% ACN prior HILIC-ELSD injection.

Sequence alignment and structure prediction

The multiple sequence alignment with TmXdhA, cellobiose dehydrogenase from N. crassa (PDB code 4QI7), and MtCDH cellobiose dehydrogenase from T. myriococcoides (PDB code 4QI4, strain CBS 208.89) was created using MUSCLE [40]. A structural model of TmXdhA was built using a colab version of AlphaFold2 [26] and the model was displayed with FAD cofactor added using PyMOL v 2.1.0 (PyMOL Molecular Graphics Systems, Schrödinger, LLC). The PyMOL molecular graphic system (V 2.1.0, Schrödinger, LLC) was used for structure visualization and structural alignments.

Statistical analyses

Averages and standard deviations were calculated over three replicate reactions (n = 3). One-way ANOVA (p < 0.05; Graphpad) with F-test and Tukey’s test were performed to ascertain the difference in specific activities towards different substrates and KM values.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.


  1. Levasseur A, Drula E, Lombard V, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. Expansion of the enzymatic repertoire of the CAZy database to integrate auxiliary redox enzymes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Westermark U, Eriksson K-E. Cellobiose: quinone oxidoreductase, a new wood-degrading enzyme from white-rot fungi. Acta Chem Scand B. 1974;28:209–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Westermark U, Eriksson K-E. Purification and properties of cellobiose: quinone oxidoreductase from Sporotrichum pulverulentum. Acta Chem Scand B. 1975;29(4):419–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henriksson G, Johansson G, Pettersson G. A critical review of cellobiose dehydrogenases. J Biotechnol. 2000;78:93–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan TC, Kracher D, Gandini R, Sygmund C, Kittl R, Haltrich D, et al. Structural basis for cellobiose dehydrogenase action during oxidative cellulose degradation. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hallberg BM, Henriksson G, Pettersson G, Vasella A, Divne C. Mechanism of the reductive half-reaction in cellobiose dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:7160–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kracher D, Ludwig R. Cellobiose dehydrogenase: an essential enzyme for lignocellulose degradation in nature—A review. J L Manag Food Environ. 2016;67:145–63.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baminger U, Subramaniam SS, Renganathan V, Haltrich D. Purification and characterization of cellobiose dehydrogenase from the plant pathogen Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:1766–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludwig R, Salamon A, Varga J, Zámocky M, Peterbauer CK, Kulbe KD, et al. Characterisation of cellobiose dehydrogenases from the white-rot fungi Trametes pubescens and Trametes villosa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:213–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schou C, Christensen MH, Schülein M. Characterization of a cellobiose dehydrogenase from Humicola insolens. Biochem J. 1998;330:565–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sygmund C, Kracher D, Scheiblbrandner S, Zahma K, Felice AKG, Harreither W, et al. Characterization of the two Neurospora crassa cellobiose dehydrogenases and their connection to oxidative cellulose degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:6161–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheiblbrandner S, Ludwig R. Cellobiose dehydrogenase: bioelectrochemical insights and applications. Bioelectrochemistry. 2020;131:107345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sützl L, Foley G, Gillam EMJ, Bodén M, Haltrich D. The GMC superfamily of oxidoreductases revisited: Analysis and evolution of fungal GMC oxidoreductases. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harreither W, Sygmund C, Augustin M, Narciso M, Rabinovich ML, Gorton L, et al. Catalytic properties and classification of cellobiose dehydrogenases from ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:1804–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Felice AKG, Schuster C, Kadek A, Filandr F, Laurent CVFP, Scheiblbrandner S, et al. Chimeric cellobiose dehydrogenases reveal the function of cytochrome domain mobility for the electron transfer to lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase. ACS Catal. 2021;11:517–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang XW, Han PJ, Bai FY, Luo A, Bensch K, Meijer M, et al. Taxonomy, phylogeny and identification of Chaetomiaceae with emphasis on thermophilic species. Stud Mycol. 2022;101:121–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koukol O. Myriococcum revisited: a revision of an overlooked fungal genus. Plant Syst Evol. 2016;302:957–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. CSFG Genomes Database. Accessed 31 Aug 2022.

  19. Henriksson G, Pettersson G, Johansson G, Ruiz A, Uzcategui E. Cellobiose oxidase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium can be cleaved by papain into two domains. Eur J Biochem. 1991;196:101–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kracher D, Forsberg Z, Bissaro B, Gangl S, Preims M, Sygmund C, et al. Polysaccharide oxidation by lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase is enhanced by engineered cellobiose dehydrogenase. FEBS J. 2020;287:897–908.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Demerec M, Adelberg EA, Clark AJ, Hartman PE. A proposal for a uniform nomenclature in bacterial genetics. Genetics. 1966;54:61–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pricelius S, Ludwig R, Lant N, Haltrich D, Guebitz GM. Substrate specificity of Myriococcum thermophilum cellobiose dehydrogenase on mono-, oligo-, and polysaccharides related to in situ production of H2O2. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;85:75–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harreither W, Coman V, Ludwig R, Haltrich D, Gorton L. Investigation of graphite electrodes modified with cellobiose dehydrogenase from the ascomycete Myriococcum thermophilum. Electroanalysis. 2007;19:172–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Flitsch A, Prasetyo EN, Sygmund C, Ludwig R, Nyanhongo GS, Guebitz GM. Cellulose oxidation and bleaching processes based on recombinant Myriococcum thermophilum cellobiose dehydrogenase. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2013;52:60–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zámocký M, Schümann C, Sygmund C, O’Callaghan J, Dobson ADW, Ludwig R, et al. Cloning, sequence analysis and heterologous expression in Pichia pastoris of a gene encoding a thermostable cellobiose dehydrogenase from Myriococcum thermophilum. Protein Expr Purif. 2008;59:258–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vuong TV, Master ER. Enzymatic upgrading of heteroxylans for added-value chemicals and polymers. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;73:51–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ludwig R, Ortiz R, Schulz C, Harreither W, Sygmund C, Gorton L. Cellobiose dehydrogenase modified electrodes: advances by materials science and biochemical engineering. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013;405:3637–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nyanhongo GS, Thallinger B, Guebitz GM. Cellobiose dehydrogenase-based biomedical applications. Process Biochem. 2017;59:37–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sützl L, Laurent CVFP, Abrera AT, Schütz G, Ludwig R, Haltrich D. Multiplicity of enzymatic functions in the CAZy AA3 family. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:2477–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yakovlev IA, Hietala AM, Courty PE, Lundell T, Solheim H, Fossdal CG. Genes associated with lignin degradation in the polyphagous white-rot pathogen Heterobasidion irregulare show substrate-specific regulation. Fungal Genet Biol. 2013;56:17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Graf MMH, Weber S, Kracher D, Kittl R, Sygmund C, Ludwig R, et al. Characterization of three pyranose dehydrogenase isoforms from the litter-decomposing basidiomycete Leucoagaricus meleagris (syn. Agaricus meleagris). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:2879–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathieu Y, Piumi F, Valli R, Aramburu JC, Ferreira P, Faulds CB, et al. Activities of secreted aryl alcohol quinone oxidoreductases from Pycnoporus cinnabarinus provide insights into fungal degradation of plant biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:2411–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Igarashi K, Kaneko S, Kitaoka M, Samejima M. Effect of C-6 methylol groups on substrate recognition of glucose/xylose mixed oligosaccharides by cellobiose dehydrogenase from the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J Appl Glycosci. 2020;67:51–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ferrari AR, Rozeboom HJ, Dobruchowska JM, Van Leeuwen SS, Vugts ASC, Koetsier MJ, et al. Discovery of a xylooligosaccharide oxidase from Myceliophthora thermophila C1. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:23709–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vuong TV, Vesterinen AH, Foumani M, Juvonen M, Seppälä J, Tenkanen M, et al. Xylo- and cello-oligosaccharide oxidation by gluco-oligosaccharide oxidase from Sarocladium strictum and variants with reduced substrate inhibition. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Haddad Momeni M, Fredslund F, Bissaro B, Raji O, Vuong TV, Meier S, et al. Discovery of fungal oligosaccharide-oxidising flavo-enzymes with previously unknown substrates, redox-activity profiles and interplay with LPMOs. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Garajova S, Mathieu Y, Beccia MR, Bennati-Granier C, Biaso F, Fanuel M, et al. Single-domain flavoenzymes trigger lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases for oxidative degradation of cellulose. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Drula E, Garron ML, Dogan S, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Terrapon N. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D571–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. FastTree. 15 Aug 2022.

  42. iTOL. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

  43. NCBI Taxonomy Browser. Accessed 31 Aug 2022.

  44. Emerson R. An experimental study on the life cycles and taxonomy of Allomyces. Lloydia. 1941;4:77–144.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Semova N, Storms R, John T, et al. Generation, annotation, and analysis of an extensive Aspergillus niger EST collection. BMC Microbiol. 2006;6:7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Aslanidis C, de Jong PJ. Ligation-independent cloning of PCR products (LIC-PCR). Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:6069–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Song L, Ouedraogo JP, Kolbusz M, Nguyen TTM, Tsang A. Efficient genome editing using tRNA promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA in Aspergillus niger. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Debets AJM, Bos CJ, Debets AJ. Isolation of small protoplasts from Aspergillus niger. Fungal Genet Rep. 1986;33:3.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Käfer E. Meiotic and mitotic recombination in Aspergillus and its chromosomal aberrations. Adv Genet. 1977;19:33–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Master ER, Zheng Y, Storms R, Tsang A, Powlowski J. A xyloglucan-specific family 12 glycosyl hydrolase from Aspergillus niger: recombinant expression, purification and characterization. Biochem J. 2008;411:161–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ausubel F, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K. Current protocols in molecular biology. Mol Reprod Dev. 1989;1:146.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Baron AJ, Stevens C, Wilmot C, Seneviratne KD, Blakeley V, Dooley DM, et al. Structure and mechanism of galactose oxidase. The free radical site. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:25095–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Legler G. Glycoside hydrolases: mechanistic information from studies with reversible and irreversible inhibitors. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 1990;48:319–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Karppi J, Zhao H, Chong S-L, Koistinen AE, Tenkanen M, Master E. Quantitative comparison of pyranose dehydrogenase action on diverse xylooligosaccharides. Front Chem. 2020;8:11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Lin SF, Yang TY, Inukai T, Yamasaki M, Tsai YC. Purification and characterization of a novel glucooligosaccharide oxidase from Acremonium strictum T1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1118:41–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the Meilahti Clinical Proteomics Core Facility of University of Helsinki for 2D-gel and MALDI-TOF-MS analyses.


This work was conducted with the funding from Academy of Finland for COCOA (Project Codes 308996 and 308997), Novo Nordisk Foundation for BIOSEMBL and Finnish Cultural Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MT and EM conceived and coordinated the study. AB performed the RNA extraction, cloning of TmxdhA and recombinant protein production. TTMN generated the phylogenetic tree. JK performed the protein purification and participated in data analyses. HZ conducted following experiments and data analyses. HZ drafted the manuscript. MT, JK, EM, TTMN, AB, and AT participated in the writing of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongbo Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Details of the characterized AA3_1 proteins in CAZy database.

Additional file 2

: Table S1. The summary of the activity of TmXdhA for hydrolysing selected nitrophenyl-sugars. Fig. S1. (A) SDS-PAGE of purified native TmXdhA (B) 2D electrophoresis gel separation of the purified TmXdhA protein Fig. S2. Negative MS spectra of XdhA oxidized A3X and A2XX. Fig. S3. Negative ion MS spectra of purified me-lactose. Fig. S4. Negative ion MS spectra of purified me-lactose. Fig. S5. Product formation and substrate depletion for mixture reactions by TmXdhA followed by HILIC-ELSD. Fig. S6. Per-residue confidence (pLDDT) score and the predicted aligned error (PAE) for TmXdhA model generated with Alphafold2. Note 1: Methylation of cellobiose and lactose. Note 2: Thin-layer chromatography for SEC purified methylated lactose and methylated cellobiose.

Additional file 3

: Multiple sequence alignment profile for the dehydrogenase domain of AA3_1 proteins.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Karppi, J., Nguyen, T.T.M. et al. Characterization of a novel AA3_1 xylooligosaccharide dehydrogenase from Thermothelomyces myriococcoides CBS 398.93. Biotechnol Biofuels 15, 135 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: