Skip to main content
Download PDF

Anode-assisted electro-fermentation with Bacillus subtilis under oxygen-limited conditions

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts volume 16, Article number: 6 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bacillus subtilis is generally regarded as a ubiquitous facultative anaerobe. Oxygen is the major electron acceptor of B. subtilis, and when oxygen is absent, B. subtilis can donate electrons to nitrate or perform fermentation. An anode electrode can also be used by microorganisms as the electron sink in systems called anodic electro-fermentation. The facultative anaerobic character of B. subtilis makes it an excellent candidate to explore with different electron acceptors, such as an anode. This study aimed to optimise industrial aerobic bioprocesses using alternative electron acceptors. In particular, different end product spectrum of B. subtilis with various electron acceptors, including anode from the electro-fermentation system, was investigated.

Results

B. subtilis was grown using three electron acceptors, i.e. oxygen, nitrate and anode (poised at a potential of 0.7 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode). The results showed oxygen had a crucial role for cells to remain metabolically active. When nitrate or anode was applied as the sole electron acceptor anaerobically, immediate cell lysis and limited glucose consumption were observed. In anode-assisted electro-fermentation with a limited aeration rate, acetoin, as the main end product showed the highest yield of 0.78 ± 0.04 molproduct/molglucose, two-fold higher than without poised potential (0.39 ± 0.08 molproduct/molglucose).

Conclusions

Oxygen controls B. subtilis biomass growth, alternative electron acceptors utilisation and metabolites formation. Limited oxygen/air supply enabled the bacteria to donate excess electrons to nitrate or anode, leading to steered product spectrum. The anode-assisted electro-fermentation showed its potential to boost acetoin production for future industrial biotechnology applications.

Background

In industrial biotechnology, oxygen is essential throughout the entire aerobic process to promote rapid cell growth and support microorganisms to maintain their metabolic functions and balance their metabolic redox state [1, 2]. The bioprocesses with high oxygen demand often face issues, such as high operational expenses, poor liquid–gas mass transfer rates and fast foam generation [3,4,5,6]. In many oxygen-dependent systems, the overall yields are limited by unsolicited cell growth and unbalanced metabolisms. The strategies used to improve oxygen independence in aerobic processes include separating the cell growth and product formation into multiple steps, utilising synthetic biology and metabolic engineering tools, or substituting oxygen with alternative electron acceptors [1, 2]. However, many current practices are limited to certain anaerobic or facultative anaerobic microorganisms [7,8,9], and future studies should focus on how to demote the oxygen dependency of industrially relevant microorganisms during the aerobic process.

Anaerobic processes include microorganisms performing fermentation or anaerobic respiration. In fermentation, fermentable substrates, like polysaccharides or sugars, are converted into pyruvate and then further oxidised into organic acids and alcohols [10]. In anaerobic respiration, some compounds, such as nitrate, sulphate, fumarate, iron (III), manganese (IV) or CO2 are used as the terminal electron acceptor [11]. Anaerobic processes are often preferred especially in industrial applications due to their low costs and relatively high volumetric production rates. However, compared to aerated systems, anaerobic respiration and fermentation come with less energy conservation, undesired by-product formation and requirement for complex downstream processes [2, 12].

Facultative anaerobic bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus sp. and Bacillus subtilis, are microorganisms that metabolise energy both aerobically and anaerobically when adapting to oxygen fluctuations [1]. B. subtilis is a rod-shaped, gram-positive bacterium that can grow aerobically and anaerobically by donating electrons to various terminal electron acceptors [13,14,15,16]. Under oxygen-limited conditions, B. subtilis is reported to perform anaerobic respiration by nitrate ammonification or mixed acid fermentation where pyruvate is converted into various metabolites, such as lactate, acetate, acetoin and 2,3-butanediol [13, 16].

B. subtilis is a well-known cell factory that produces enzymes, heterologous proteins, food additives, vitamins, antibiotics, amino acids and insecticides [17,18,19]. Two fine chemicals naturally formed by B. subtilis, acetoin (3-hydroxybutanone or acetyl methyl carbinol) and its reduced form, 2,3-butanediol, have shown growing market share in food, cosmetics and chemical and agriculture industries during the last decades [20]. At the industrial manufacturing level, bulk production of acetoin and 2,3-butanediol relies on chemical synthesis using fossil feedstocks [20]. Due to the increasing environmental and financial concerns, biotechnological acetoin and 2,3-butanediol production from biomass origin with microorganisms are explored. Most of the acetoin and 2,3-butanediol producer, nonetheless, are pathogenic and cannot be used for industrial starter cultures, e.g. Serratia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Raoultella, and Salmonella [21,22,23]. B. subtilis, on the other hand, is recognised as safe by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

The acetoin and 2,3-butanediol production in B. subtilis typically use oxygen as the electron acceptor and small molecule sugars (e.g. glucose, xylose or sucrose) as substrate, while the formation of by-products (e.g. lactate, acetate, and ethanol) has been observed. During the acetoin production processes, oxygen can be one of the limiting factors since high dissolved oxygen concentrations are required to re-oxidise NAD(P)H or FADH2 and to generate ATP effectively [24]. One novel approach suggested to demote oxygen dependency and steer the metabolism of B. subtilis is the use of anodic electro-fermentation [2]. In anodic electro-fermentation, an anode of a bioelectrochemical system (BES) working as an electron sink accepts surplus electrons from microorganisms upon substrate oxidation, which can support a more balanced redox state with fewer undesired by-products [25, 26]. B. subtilis was proposed as an ideal starter culture for anodic electro-fermentation due to its ability to produce naturally a redox-active mediator and form a conductive biofilm [2, 27]. Yet, the comprehensive information about B. subtilis fermentative process using an anode as an electron acceptor, especially under oxygen-limited conditions, has not been fully revealed.

This study investigated the potential of utilising B. subtilis for acetoin and 2,3-butanediol production from glucose under different oxygen supplies and alternative electron acceptors. Three electron acceptors (with different states of matter), i.e. oxygen (gas), nitrate (liquid) and anode from BES (solid), were tested. Furthermore, the effects of anaerobic and oxygen-limited conditions on the use of two additional electron acceptors, i.e. nitrate and the anode, were examined by monitoring the glucose consumption, cell densities and end product formation.

Materials and methods

Microbial strain and aerobic cultivation conditions

B. subtilis 168 trpC xyl+ previously constructed by Averesch & Rothschild [28] for para-aminobenzoic acid production was cultivated in M9 minimal medium amended with 27.8 mM (5 g/L) glucose as the sole carbon source in all experiments. For detailed medium composition, the reader is referred to Additional file 1. The pH of the growth medium was adjusted to 7.1 using 1 M HCl. Agar plates were prepared with the same M9 minimal medium and 15 g/L agar–agar. Pre-cultures were prepared by picking and transferring single colonies from agar plates into baffled shake flasks and placed on a rotary shaker (IKA KS4000i Control, Germany) for aerobic overnight cultivation at 300 rpm and 35 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (at 8000 rpm, 4 °C, 10 min), washed and resuspended in fresh M9 medium before transferring into the main cultivation vessels. Inoculum was added to reach an initial optical density (OD) of 0.1 at 600 nm in shake flasks, and for oxygen-limited experiments higher initial OD (0.4–0.7) was aimed at to ensure enough cells as biocatalysts under limited growth conditions (Table 1). Aerobic experiments were accomplished by using 100 mL shake flasks with 20% liquid volume at 300 rpm and 35 °C. In selected experiments, the real-time cell densities for different concentrations of K3[Fe(CN)6] (0, 0.5, 1.5 and 5 mM) were monitored using a cell growth quantifier (SBI, Germany).

Table 1 Different cultivation vessels and operational parameters tested in this study
Full size table

Anaerobic and microaerobic serum flasks

Anaerobic and microaerobic cultivations with nitrate as electron acceptor were done by using 120 mL serum flasks with 80% liquid volume and incubated at 150 rpm and 35 °C. Serum flasks were prepared by initially adding the buffer solution and 23.5 mM (2 g/L) sodium nitrate sparged with N2 gas (Woikoski Oy, Finland) for 30 min to remove the dissolved oxygen. Before autoclaving, the headspace was filled with N2 at 1.4 atmospheres monitored by a gas meter (LEO1, KELLER, Switzerland). Concentrated glucose and trace element solutions were prepared in separate sterile and anaerobic serum flasks using the same technique. All needles and syringes used for serum flask experiments were flushed with sterile N2 gas before adding the concentrated solutions to reach the concentrations of the M9 medium. For microaerobic experiments, the headspace overpressure was released immediately after the inoculum was added and replaced with 4 mL sterile O2 gas (Woikoski Oy, Finland).

Bioelectrochemical system and operation

Bioelectrochemical experiments were prepared using 300 mL H-type borosilicate reactors (Adams and Chittenden Scientific Glass, USA). Detailed BES reactor setup and medium compositions are shown in Additional file 1. K3[Fe(CN)6] (1.5 mM) was added to the anolytes of selected runs to act as a redox mediator. A circular cation exchange membrane (19.6 cm2 projected surface area, CMI-7000, Membranes International Inc. USA) was placed between the anodic and the cathodic chambers. BESs used a three-electrode setup. Anode was made of carbon felt (17.9 cm2 projected surface area, 1.1 cm thickness, Alfa Aesar, USA) wrapped around a graphite rod (15 cm × 3 mm, Sigma Aldrich, USA). A platinum wire (10 cm × 0.4 mm, Research Material Ltd, UK) was used as the cathode, and an Ag/AgCl 3 M NaCl reference electrode (RE-5B, BASi, USA) was placed in the anode chamber. All potentials were reported with respect to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). The working electrode, counter electrode and reference electrode were connected to a multi-channel potentiostat (VMP3, BioLogic, France) to apply the desired anode potential and record the current.

In advance of anaerobic BES inoculation, anolyte was sparged with N2 for 30 min at a 1.5 L/min flow rate to remove dissolved oxygen. Afterwards, N2 gas was switched to continuously sparge the headspace of the anodic chamber to assure anoxic conditions during the operation. In aerated BES experiments, the air was sparged through a peristaltic tube (L/S 16, Masterflex, USA) to a liquid medium using mass flow controllers (EL-FLOW FG, Bronkhorst, the Netherlands) at 5 mL/min (limited aeration) or 30 mL/min (moderate aeration) flow rate. N2 or air inlet was first attached to sterile vent filters (0.2 µm 50 mm Millex-FG PTFE, Merck, USA) and to gas washing bottles filled with sterile MQ water, then connected to the reactors. Table 1 shows the different gases supplied and some key parameters of the different runs. For each condition tested, every data point was averaged from three to four biological replicates and the standard deviations were calculated. Student’s t-tests were used to prove the significant difference for BES results (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Parameters and metabolites analyses

Liquid samples were taken hourly from shake flasks, or daily from serum flasks and anodic chambers of the BESs. For moderate aeration experiments, there was a slight variation in sampling time points reflected in x-axis error bars as different replicates were run at different time periods. pH was measured using a pH meter (3110, WTW, Germany). Cell density was analysed photometrically using a spectrophotometer (UV-1800, Shimadzu, Japan) with absorbance at 600 nm wavelength. Concentrations of glucose, lactate, succinate, acetate, acetoin, 2,3-butanediol and ethanol were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after filtering through 0.2 µm syringe filters (CHROMAFIL® Xtra PET-45/25, Germany). An HPLC (SIL-20, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a refractive index (RI) detector and a sugar column (Rezex™ RHM-Monosaccharide H+, 300 × 7.8 mm) was used for glucose analysis under the following conditions: column temperature of 40 °C, injection volume of 50 µL, 5 mM sulfuric acid mobile phase at 0.5 mL/min flow rate and 30 min retention time. Concentrations of lactate, succinate, acetate, acetoin, 2,3-butanediol and ethanol were determined using the same HPLC and column under the following conditions: column temperature of 83 °C, injection volume of 100 µL, 10 mM sulfuric acid mobile phase at 0.5 mL/min flow rate and 30 min retention time. Nitrate (NO3−) and nitrite (NO2−) concentrations were determined using ion chromatography (ICS-1600, Thermo Fischer Scientific, USA) equipped with an IonPac AG42-SC (4 × 50 mm) guard column, and an IonPac AS4A-SC (4 × 250 mm) analytical anion exchange column under the similar conditions described in Ref. [29]. The gas samples in the headspace (CO2, O2 and N2) were measured by gas chromatography (GC-2014, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) using the same column and methods as described in Ref. [30].

Cyclic voltammetry

Cyclic voltammetry was performed before and after the experiments to characterise the mediator and the anode. The anodic chamber of the H-type reactors was filled with a defined M9 minimal medium, while the cathodic chamber contained a phosphate buffer solution. The same three-electrode setup as shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1 was used. For the CV measurements, current profiles were recorded by scanning the anode potential at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s within a potential window from 0.2 to 0.9 V vs. SHE, to measure oxidation and reduction reactions of the solution. During the measurements, the temperature was controlled at 35 °C and stirring was switched off. Three cycles (repeats) were recorded at each CV measurement.

Results

Aerobic respiration and nitrate respiration of B. subtilis

Oxygen or nitrite as the electron acceptors for B. subtilis was first tested, and cell growth and formation of metabolites were measured. When oxygen was used as the electron acceptor, glucose was rapidly depleted within 10 h with a consumption rate of 2.3 ± 0.1 mmol/L/h, at which time point the maximum cell density (OD600 = 5.0) was reached and the pH dropped from 7.0 to 6.2 (Fig. 1a, b). Acetate (14.6 ± 0.2 mmol/L) was the main end product besides biomass, along with low titres of acetoin (2.2 ± 0.2 mM) and ethanol (2.0 mM, only measured in one replicate). Overall, aerobic growth gave approximately 61.5% carbon and redox balances (for equations, see Calculations, Additional file 1; for all carbon balances and redox balances calculated, see Additional file 1: Table S1), and acetate presented the highest product yield of 0.7 ± 0.2 molproduct/molglucose (for all production rates and yields calculated, see Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

B. subtilis grown in aerobic shake flasks: pH and optical density (OD) a, glucose consumption and main metabolites measured from aerobic shake flasks b, and B. subtilis grown in serum flasks amended with 23.5 mM (2 g/L) sodium nitrate under the anaerobic [+ N2] and microaerobic conditions [+ 4% O2]: pH and OD c, glucose, nitrate consumption and end products concentrations measured from the serum bottles under microaerobic condition d. All tested reactors and parameters are given in Table 1. Results are based on average data of three to five biological replicates and standard deviations are represented as error bars

Full size image

Nitrate could not be used as the sole electron acceptor under anaerobic conditions. Immediate cell lysis (Fig. 1c) with no substrate consumption nor end products formation was detected in the fermentation broth. Nevertheless, B. subtilis performed nitrate respiration under the microaerobic condition when oxygen (4%) was injected into the headspace of the serum flasks. After the headspace oxygen level dropped from 4% to below 1% in 8 h after the inoculation, the nitrate concentration started to decrease and completely consumed after 50 h (Fig. 1d), resulting in a 0.5 ± 0.1 mM nitrate consumption rate. Compared to aerobic growth, lower cell density (OD600 = 1.7, Fig. 1c) was measured in serum bottles with 0.7 ± 0.2 mM glucose consumption rates. Main metabolites were acetate (11.9 ± 0.4 mM), acetoin (9.7 ± 1.2 mM) and 2,3-butanediol (3.2 ± 0.6 mM). By the end of the experiment, approximately 23 mL CO2 was measured from the headspace (Additional file 1: Fig. S2), with 67% carbon and redox balances.

Anaerobic anode respiration of B. subtilis

To investigate whether an anode can be used as the sole electron acceptor, B. subtilis was inoculated in BESs operated under anaerobic conditions. In addition, K3[Fe(CN)6] was tested and added as a redox mediator to enhance the microbial extracellular electron transfer to the anode. The abiotic result of the cyclic voltammetry after adding K3[Fe(CN)6] shows the oxidative and reductive peaks at 0.3 and 0.6 V, respectively, with a midpoint potential of 0.5 V (Fig. 2a). Briefly, in the biological experiments, the added 1.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] boosted the overall current densities in BES and showed no significant inhibition on the aerobic growth of B. subtilis in shake flasks (for aerobic growth with different K3[Fe(CN)6] concentrations (Additional file 1: Fig. S6)). After inoculating the BES, the current density immediately increased to 0.05 mA/cm2 and then gradually dropped to 0.01 mA/cm2 after 50 h. In total, 155.9 ± 31.6 C was transferred to the anode over 170 h. The planktonic cell density decreased from OD600 0.7 to 0.2 in 2 h after the inoculation and remained stable afterwards. A minor drop in pH from 7.1 to 6.9 was observed (Fig. 2b). Glucose uptake was hindered in the anaerobic BES with less than 0.01 mmol/L/h glucose consumption rate and 80% of the added glucose was left after 170 h (Fig. 2c). Lactate and 2,3-butanediol were the only metabolites detected (Fig. 2c) with end-point concentrations of 7.7 ± 1.0 mM and 1.1 ± 0.8 mM, respectively. The open-circuit reactors showed almost identical results with only lower end-point concentrations of lactate (4.9 ± 2.0 mM) and no 2,3-butanediol detected (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

B. subtilis grown in anaerobic BES with glucose as substrate and K3[Fe(CN)6] acting as a mediator. Current density and charge logged at poised anode potential 0.7 V and abiotic electrochemical characterisation of the mediator via CV using graphite felt as the working electrode a. Optical density and pH b, glucose, lactate and 2,3-butanediol concentrations c were measured from the reactors with applied potential [AP] and open circuit [OC]. Results are based on average data of three biological replicates and standard deviations are represented as coloured area and error bars

Full size image

Anode-assisted respiration of B. subtilis under moderate aeration

Based on the anaerobic serum flask results, oxygen is obligatory for B. subtilis. Thus, anode-assisted aerobic respiration was investigated by aerating the anolyte under a moderate aeration rate (30 mL/min). In total, three-fold more charge was transferred to the anode (491.9 ± 56.6 C) compared to the anaerobic condition with a three-fold higher current density reached (up to 0.17 mA/cm2) (Fig. 3a). The highest planktonic cell density (OD600 = 1.3) was measured after 44.7 h (Fig. 3b) under applied potential and open-circuit conditions. Similar concentrations of metabolites were detected under AP and OC (for statistical significance results, see Additional file 1: Table S2), and acetoin as the main metabolite reached an average end-point concentration of 19.2 mM, followed by 2,3-butanediol (12.7 mM, peak concentration), lactate (7.8 mM, peak concentration) and acetate (3.2 mM, peak concentration) (Fig. 3c, Additional file 1: Fig. S3). Lactate and 2,3-butanediol concentrations decreased after 26.6 h and 44.7 h, respectively, under both conditions with average consumption rates of 0.3 and 0.4 mmol/L/h, respectively. Lactate and 2,3-butanediol as intermediate products were depleted completely at the end of the experiment. A slightly higher pH was measured in the AP (pH 6.9) compared to the OC reactors (pH 6.5). Overall, 82% carbon and redox balances were achieved, with an acetoin yield of 0.8 molproduct/molglucose under both conditions.

Fig. 3
figure 3

B. subtilis grown in BES under the moderate aeration condition with glucose as substrate and K3[Fe(CN)6] acting as a mediator. Current density and charge logged at a poised anode potential of 0.7 V a. Optical density and pH were measured from reactors with applied potential [AP] and open circuit [OC] b, and glucose and end product concentrations were measured from AP c and OC d. Concentrations for acetate (Additional File 1: Fig. S3) are shown in Additional File 1. Results are based on average data of three biological replicates and standard deviations are represented as coloured area and error bars

Full size image

Anode-assisted respiration of B. subtilis under limited aeration

When less oxygen was available by decreasing the air flow rate from moderate (30 mL/min) to limited (5 mL/min), B. subtilis showed different characteristics of growth and product spectrum. In reactors under the poised anode potential, a current density of 0.15 mA/cm2 was reached after 24 h (Fig. 4a), resulting in a total charge transfer of 926.2 ± 22.7 C to the anode i.e. 1.9 times more than under the moderate aeration. A steady planktonic cell density was measured (OD600 = 0.6) and pH decreased over time from 7.1 to 6.1. Glucose was progressively consumed with an average rate of 0.2 mmol/L/h and depleted after 145 h (AP) and 169 h (OC) (Fig. 4c). Acetoin fermentation was dominant in AP reactors with a peak concentration of 17.8 ± 0.6 mM, as opposed to OC where the highest concentration of lactate (16.3 ± 2.1 mM) was measured. Both moderate and limited aeration led to similar amounts of 2,3-butanediol or acetate (Additional file 1: Figs. S3, S4d, e, f). Under limited aeration, lactate and 2,3-butanediol concentrations decreased after 47.8 h and 120.4 h, respectively, with three-fold slower consumption rates than under moderate conditions (0.1 mmol/L/h for lactate and 2,3-butanediol). Overall, 85% carbon and redox balances were calculated under limited aeration, with the highest acetoin yield (0.7 ± 0.02 molproduct/molglucose) found in AP reactors.

Fig. 4
figure 4

B. subtilis grown in BES under the limited aeration condition with glucose as substrate and K3[Fe(CN)6] acting as a mediator. Current density and charge logged at a poised anode potential of 0.7 V a. Optical density and pH b, glucose, lactate, acetoin and 2,3-butanediol concentrations c–f were measured from reactors with applied potential [AP] and open circuit [OC]. Results without the addition of K3[Fe(CN)6] (Additional file 1: Fig. S5) are shown in Additional file 1. Results are based on average data of three biological replicates and standard deviations are represented as coloured area and error bars

Full size image

Discussion

The role of oxygen for B. subtilis growth and end product spectrum

In this study, the absence of oxygen restricted the metabolic activity of B. subtilis and resulted in abrupt cell lysis, although many studies have shown B. subtilis can grow without oxygen using alternative electron acceptors, including nitrate [13, 32, 33]. Among all the tested conditions, the highest cell density (OD600 = 5.1) was measured in aerobic shake flasks with an average doubling time of 1.6 h. A typical oxygen volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) in similar aerobic shake flasks and growth conditions is ranging from 160 to 226 h–1 [34], nearly five times higher compared to the estimated 36 h–1 in H-type reactors used with moderate aeration in anode-assisted electro-fermentation in this study [35]. When nitrate or anode was used as the alternative electron acceptor by B. subtilis, lower glucose consumption rates (< 0.7 mM/h) and cell densities (OD600 < 2) compared to aerobic shake flasks (2.3 mM/h) were observed, indicating that limited energy was available with restricted biomass formation when using the alternative electron acceptors. Oxygen as the electron acceptor facilitates sugar metabolism, energy conservation and nicotinamide cofactors, e.g. nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), regeneration in many microorganisms [2]. In B. subtilis, reduced dissolved oxygen concentration during cultivations has also earlier shown enhanced fermentation products with 50% less biomass formed [24].

According to the results, low oxygen supply enabled B. subtilis to donate electrons to alternative electron acceptors. The results suggested that low concentrations of oxygen were essential for cells to activate nitrate and anode-assisted respiration. Oxygen might not only function as electron acceptor but could have also acted as the transcriptional signal chemical to enable the anaerobic pathway [35]. For example, oxygen limitation induces the transcription of anaerobic genes and regulators for nitrate respiration in B. subtilis [36]. For anode-assisted respiration, oxygen may have played a more indispensable role as electron acceptor, since constant supply of oxygen was needed. At the energy level, nitrate respiration releases more free energy than fermentation: ΔG0 = − 2870 kJ/molglucose for oxygen, − 858 kJ/molglucose for nitrate and − 218 kJ/molglucose for fermentation, respectively [2, 37, 38]. Cell growth (OD600 = 1.7) was also observed under the microaerobic condition with consumption of nitrate in contrast to fast cell lysis under anaerobic conditions in this study. However, the fundamental understanding of nitrate respiration in B. subtilis under the microaerobic condition remains to be further examined.

Different aeration schemes affected the end product spectrum of B. subtilis. In aerobic shake flasks, acetate was the main end product (15.2 mM), whereas in BES experiments with both aeration schemes one-fourth of acetate concentration was measured. In B. subtilis, acetate is typically formed from acetyl-CoA via a two-step reaction encoded by pta and ackA and the formation of acetate during aerobic respiration is explained by metabolic overflow, which activates fermentative pathways to allow faster ATP production per unit cell membrane area [39,40,41]. During the nitrate respiration, besides acetate formation, other fermentation products, including acetoin and 2,3-butanediol, also started to appear. An increase in overall fermentative activities can be expected when oxygen is not available for the cofactors’ regeneration. In B. subtilis, increased NADH-coupled products secretion, i.e. lactate and 2,3-butanediol (up to 16.3 mM and 12.3 mM, respectively), was observed under the oxygen-limited conditions in BESs. However, lactate was not excreted in nitrate-added serum flasks. It has been reported that under nitrate respiration fermentation is less preferred by B. subtilis in terms of cofactors regeneration [36] and that the presence of nitrate under oxygen-limited conditions can drastically decrease fermentative enzyme activities, including lactate dehydrogenase [42].

Anode-assisted electro-fermentation with B. subtilis

Previous anodic electro-fermentation studies have demonstrated that the combination of poised anode potential (0.7 V vs. SHE) and K3[Fe(CN)6] as the redox mediator enhanced the anaerobic metabolic activities of Pseudomonas putida F1 and Corynebacterium glutamicum lysC [25, 26, 43]. Under anode respiration in this study, B. subtilis cells were unable to maintain metabolic activity showing incomplete glucose oxidation. In contrast to the shake flasks, anaerobic BESs had almost zero glucose consumption, no planktonic cell growth and limited end product formation. Moderate aeration resulted in at least three-fold more charge transferred to the anode compared to anaerobic conditions. However, under moderate aeration, the anode did not show significant impacts on changing the product spectrum and oxygen was likely still acting as the main electron acceptor. With moderate aeration, the anode could not function as an electron sink for cells to uninterruptedly balance the redox per se causing almost identical end product concentrations with or without poised anode potential.

When the oxygen supply was switched to limited aeration in BESs, cells were forced to seek alternative electron acceptors and an increased number of surplus electrons (926.2 ± 22.7 C, limited aeration) with enhanced acetoin formation were observed. Chen et al. [44] suggested that NAD(H)+ played an important role during the extracellular electron transfer of B. subtilis, which likely explained the different NADH-coupled metabolites showed in this study: as the total amount of electrons shuttled to the anode increased over time, cofactor levels might have been altered by the anode, in which case less NADH-coupled metabolites are needed to balance the redox state (e.g. lactate and 2,3-butanediol). In B. subtilis, NAD+ regeneration is typically mediated by cytoplasmic lactate dehydrogenase [45]. One hypothesis is that in anode-assisted systems under limited aeration, NAD+ was regenerated in several ways; hence, the lower lactate concentration was observed under the poised potential. However, anode did not significantly influence other fermentation steps which involved NAD+ regeneration, e.g. production of 2,3-butanediol from acetoin, as similar levels of 2,3-butanediol productivities were observed under limited aeration with poised potential (0.11 ± 0.02 mmol/L/h) and in open circuit (0.09 ± 0.03 mmol/L/h). On the other hand, if the anode helped to increase the cofactor levels, such as NAD+, the conversion of lactate to pyruvate might also have been accelerated. Pyruvate can either re-enter the TCA cycle to potentially enhance the acetoin production or accumulate in cells to trigger the acetoin excretion as a strategy for cells to maintain the intercellular pH during the stationary phase [45]. Alternatively, the applied anode potential may also change the oxidation–reduction potential (ORP) of the fermentation broth or the intracellular redox state, the principle of which is still to be discovered [47].

Higher acetoin yield with anode-assisted electro-fermentation systems

Adaptation of B. subtilis to alternative electron acceptors revealed future perspectives of using anode-assisted electro-fermentation under oxygen-limited conditions for enhanced acetoin production. First, among all tested conditions (Table 1), the high yield of acetoin (0.71–0.78 molproduct/molglucose) achieved under oxygen-limited conditions (Fig. 5) is comparable to the acetoin production of metabolically engineered B. subtilis strains (from 0.62 to 0.77 molproduct/molglucose [48,49,50]). Although the highest production rate of acetoin (0.3 ± 0.1 mM/h) was found under nitrate respiration, a lower yield (0.3 ± 0.01 molproduct/molglucose) indicated the limitation for acetoin production under the anaerobic respiration. The results suggested that aerobic acetoin bioprocesses can be optimised with a very low air supply rate along with poised anode potential. A low aeration rate can bring financial benefits regarding operational costs and fewer foaming-related issues for industrial applications [2]. Furthermore, another industrially related strain, P. putida KT2440, was reported to improve glycolipid surfactants production under similar oxygen-limited conditions with poised anode potential [51], highlighting the potential of anodic electro-fermentation to decrease the oxygen requirements of aerobic bioprocesses.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Maximum production yields (x-axis) associated with production rates (y-axis) under different conditions tested with oxygen, nitrate and anode as electron acceptors. In contrast to acetoin (neon green) and acetate (metallic violet), intermediate products 2,3-butanediol (crimson red) and lactate (light azure) concentrations declined during the experiments; therefore, only the highest production rates are shown

Full size image

Conclusions

The biomass production, alternative electron acceptors utilisation and end product spectrum of the B. subtilis strain differed under different oxygen supplies. Both nitrate and anode-assisted respiration of B. subtilis occurred under oxygen-limited conditions, while fast cell lysis was observed in strictly anaerobic environments. Overall, depending on the electron acceptor the biochemical production shifted from acetate in aerobic conditions to acetate and acetoin under nitrate respiration, and further to mostly acetoin in BESs. Under limited aeration, poised anode potential at 0.7 V showed steered product spectrum towards acetoin production (17.8 ± 0.6 mM at applied potential vs. 9.7 ± 2.0 mM at open circuit), with lactate and 2,3-butanediol as intermediate products. In such anode-assisted systems, a high acetoin yield of 0.7 molproduct/molglucose was achieved with more balanced energy distribution between biomass production and end product formation compared to systems without poised anode potential or aerobic shake flask experiments. This research highlighted the potential of anode-assisted electro-fermentation to connect an industrial aerobic microorganism with bioelectrochemical systems with reduced oxygen dependency for biochemical production.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ADP:

Adenosine diphosphate

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

AP:

Applied potential

BES:

Bioelectrochemical system

CV:

Cyclic voltammetry

FADH2 :

Flavin adenine dinucleotide

GC:

Gas chromatography

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

IC:

Ion chromatography

NAD+/NADH:

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (oxidised/reduced)

NADP+/NADPH:

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (oxidised/reduced)

OC:

Open circuit

OD:

Optical density

SHE:

Standard hydrogen electrode

TCA:

Trichloroacetic acid

References

  1. Lange J, Takors R, Blombach B. Zero-growth bioprocesses: a challenge for microbial production strains and bioprocess engineering. Eng Life Sci. 2017;17:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201600108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vassilev I, Averesch NJH, Ledezma P, Kokko M. Anodic electro-fermentation: empowering anaerobic production processes via anodic respiration. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;48:107728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Junker BH, Stanik M, Barna C, Salmon P, Buckland BC. Influence of impeller type on mass transfer in fermentation vessels. Bioprocess Eng. 1998;19:403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490050540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee GH, Hur W, Bremmon CE, Flickinger MC. Lysine production from methanol at 50 °C using Bacillus methanolicus: modeling volume control, lysine concentration, and productivity using a three-phase continuous simulation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960320)49:6%3c639::AID-BIT5%3e3.0.CO;2-P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delvigne F, Lecomte J. Foam formation and control in bioreactors. Encyclopedia of Industrial Biotechnology: Bioprocess, Bioseparation, and Cell Technology. Hoboken NJ USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470054581.eib326.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Humbird D, Davis R, McMillan JD. Aeration costs in stirred-tank and bubble column bioreactors. Biochem Eng J. 2017;127:161–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.08.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nealson KH, Belz A, McKee B. Breathing metals as a way of life: geobiology in action. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002;81:215–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020518818647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishimura T, Vertès AA, Shinoda Y, Inui M, Yukawa H. Anaerobic growth of corynebacterium glutamicum using nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75:889–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-0879-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tebo BM, Obraztsova AY. Sulfate-reducing bacterium grows with Cr(VI), U(VI), Mn(IV), and Fe(III) as electron acceptors. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998;162:193–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb12998.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stanbury P, Whitaker A, Stephen H. Principles of fermentation technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-00186-7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Lovley DR, Coates JD. Novel forms of anaerobic respiration of environmental relevance. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2000;3:252–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00085-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weusthuis RA, Lamot I, van der Oost J, Sanders JPM. Microbial production of bulk chemicals: development of anaerobic processes. Trends Biotechnol. 2011;29:153–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.12.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmann T, Troup B, Szabo A, Hungerer C, Jahn D. The anaerobic life of Bacillus subtilis: cloning of the genes encoding the respiratory nitrate reductase system. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;131:219–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07780.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun G, Sharkova E, Chesnut R, Birkey S, Duggan MF, Sorokin A, et al. Regulators of aerobic and anaerobic respiration in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:1374–85. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.5.1374-1385.1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakano MM, Dailly YP, Zuber P, Clark DP. Characterization of anaerobic fermentative growth of Bacillus subtilis: identification of fermentation end products and genes required for growth. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:6749–55. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.179.21.6749-6755.1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakano MM, Zuber P. Anaerobic growth of a “strict aerobe” (Bacillus subtilis). Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schallmey M, Singh A, Ward OP. Developments in the use of Bacillus species for industrial production. Can J Microbiol. 2004;50:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1139/w03-076.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gu Y, Xu X, Wu Y, Niu T, Liu Y, Li J, et al. Advances and prospects of Bacillus subtilis cellular factories: from rational design to industrial applications. Metab Eng. 2018;50:109–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2018.05.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Su Y, Liu C, Fang H, Zhang D. Bacillus subtilis: a universal cell factory for industry, agriculture, biomaterials and medicine. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01436-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao Z, Lu JR. Strategies for enhancing fermentative production of acetoin: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.01.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bursac T, Gralnick JA, Gescher J. Acetoin production via unbalanced fermentation in Shewanella oneidensis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114:1283–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Förster AH, Beblawy S, Golitsch F, Gescher J. Electrode-assisted acetoin production in a metabolically engineered escherichia coli strain. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0745-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim C, Kim MY, Michie I, Jeon BH, Premier GC, Park S, et al. Anodic electro-fermentation of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from glycerol by recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae L17 in a bioelectrochemical system. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0886-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu J, Lei P, Mohsin A, Liu X, Huang M, Li L, et al. Mixomics analysis of Bacillus subtilis: effect of oxygen availability on riboflavin production. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0764-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vassilev I, Gießelmann G, Schwechheimer SK, Wittmann C, Virdis B, Krömer JO. Anodic electro-fermentation: anaerobic production of L-lysine by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115:1499–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26562.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lai B, Yu S, Bernhardt PV, Rabaey K, Virdis B, Krömer JO. Anoxic metabolism and biochemical production in Pseudomonas putida F1 driven by a bioelectrochemical system. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0452-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nimje VR, Chen C-Y, Chen C-C, Jean J-S, Reddy AS, Fan C-W, et al. Stable and high energy generation by a strain of Bacillus subtilis in a microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources. 2009;190:258–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Averesch NJH, Rothschild LJ. Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for production of para -aminobenzoic acid—unexpected importance of carbon source is an advantage for space application. Microb Biotechnol. 2019;12:703–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Määttä L, Hajdu-Rahkama R, Oinonen C, Puhakka JA. Effects of metal extraction liquors from electric vehicle battery materials production on iron and sulfur oxidation by heap bioleaching microorganisms. Miner Eng. 2022;178:107409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Khanongnuch R, Mangayil R, Santala V, Hestnes AG, Svenning MM, Rissanen AJ. Batch experiments demonstrating a two-stage bacterial process coupling methanotrophic and heterotrophic bacteria for 1-alkene production from methane. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:874627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.874627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Priest FG. Systematics and Ecology of Bacillus. In: Sonenshein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R, editors. Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria. Washington DC USA: ASM Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555818388.ch1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Clements LD, Miller BS, Streips UN. Comparative growth analysis of the facultative anaerobes Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Escherichia coli. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2002;25:284–6. https://doi.org/10.1078/0723-2020-00108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hemmerich J. Fed-batch cultivation in baffled shake flasks: option enables the assessment of bioprocesses in early development. Genet Eng Biotechnol News. 2011;31:52–4. https://doi.org/10.1089/gen.31.14.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gowthaman MK, Rao KSMSR, Ghildyal NP, Karanth NG. Estimation of KLa in solid-state fermentation using a packed-bed bioreactor. Process Biochem. 1995;30:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-9592(95)87002-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Härtig E, Jahn D. Regulation of the anaerobic metabolism in Bacillus subtilis. Advances in microbial physiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394423-8.00005-6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Nakano MM, Zuber P, Glaser P, Danchin A, Hulett FM. Two-component regulatory proteins ResD-ResE are required for transcriptional activation of fnr upon oxygen limitation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:3796–802. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.13.3796-3802.1996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tran QH, Unden G. Changes in the proton potential and the cellular energetics of Escherichia coli during growth by aerobic and anaerobic respiration or by fermentation. Eur J Biochem. 1998;251:538–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2510538.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Unden G, Bongaerts J. Alternative respiratory pathways of Escherichia coli: energetics and transcriptional regulation in response to electron acceptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1320:217–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(97)00034-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kabisch J, Pratzka I, Meyer H, Albrecht D, Lalk M, Ehrenreich A, et al. Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for growth on overflow metabolites. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dauner M, Storni T, Sauer U. Bacillus subtilis metabolism and energetics in carbon-limited and excess-carbon chemostat culture. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:7308–17. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.24.7308-7317.2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Szenk M, Dill KA, de Graff AMR. Why do fast-growing bacteria enter overflow metabolism? Testing the membrane real estate hypothesis. Cell Syst. 2017;5:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2017.06.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cruz Ramos H, Hoffmann T, Marino M, Nedjari H, Presecan-Siedel E, Dreesen O, et al. Fermentative metabolism of Bacillus subtilis: physiology and regulation of gene expression. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:3072–80. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.11.3072-3080.2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kracke F, Vassilev I, Krömer JO. Microbial electron transport and energy conservation—the foundation for optimizing bioelectrochemical systems. Front Microbiol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen L, Cao C, Wang S, Varcoe JR, Slade RCT, Avignone-Rossa C, et al. Electron communication of Bacillus subtilis in harsh environments. iScience. 2019;12:260–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Romero S, Merino E, Bolívar F, Gosset G, Martinez A. Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for ethanol production: lactate dehydrogenase plays a key role in fermentative metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5190–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00625-07.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tsau J-L, Guffanti AA, Montville TJ. Conversion of pyruvate to acetoin helps to maintain pH homeostasis in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58:891–4. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.58.3.891-894.1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Virdis B, Hoelzle DR, Marchetti A, Boto ST, Rosenbaum MA, Blasco-Gómez R, et al. Electro-fermentation: sustainable bioproductions steered by electricity. Biotechnol Adv. 2022;59:107950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang X, Zhang R, Bao T, Yang T, Xu M, Li H, et al. Moderate expression of the transcriptional regulator ALsR enhances acetoin production by Bacillus subtilis. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40:1067–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-013-1303-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang X, Zhang R, Bao T, Rao Z, Yang T, Xu M, et al. The rebalanced pathway significantly enhances acetoin production by disruption of acetoin reductase gene and moderate-expression of a new water-forming NADH oxidase in Bacillus subtilis. Metab Eng. 2014;23:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2014.02.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bao T, Zhang X, Zhao X, Rao Z, Yang T, Yang S. Regulation of the NADH pool and NADH/NADPH ratio redistributes acetoin and 2,3-butanediol proportion in Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:1298–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Askitosari TD, Berger C, Tiso T, Harnisch F, Blank LM, Rosenbaum MA. Coupling an electroactive Pseudomonas putida KT2440 with bioelectrochemical rhamnolipid production. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8121959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors hope to thank Dr. Nils J.H. Averesch (Stanford University) for providing Bacillus subtilis strain.

Funding

This work was supported by Tampere University Doctoral School.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 8, 33720, Tampere, Finland

    Yu Sun, Marika Kokko & Igor Vassilev

Authors
  1. Yu Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marika Kokko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Igor Vassilev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YS contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, visualisation and writing—original draft. MK and IV were involved in conceptualisation, methodology, supervision and writing—review & editing. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu Sun or Igor Vassilev.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig S1.

Schematic figure and photo of bioelectrochemical setup used in this study. Fig S2. Headspace gas compositions measured in microaerobic serum flasks. Results are based on the average data of three biological replicates. Fig S3. Acetate concentrations measured in BES systems under different cultivation conditions (see Table 1, main article). Results are based on the average data of three to four biological replicates and standard deviations are represented as error bars. Fig S4. B. subtilis grown in BES under limited aeration without adding K3[Fe(CN)6]. Ten times less current density and charge were logged at a poised anode potential of 0.7 V (vs. SHE) reactors compared to reactors amended with K3[Fe(CN)6] (a). Optical density and pH (b), glucose, lactate, acetoin and 2,3-butanediol concentrations (c, d, e, f) were measured from applied potential (AP) and open-circuit (OC) reactors. Results are based on the average data of four biological replicates and standard deviations are represented as coloured areas or error bars. Fig S5. B. subtilis grown in aerobic shake flasks with the addition of 0, 0.5, 1.5 and 5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] in the M9 medium with 5 g/L glucose. The backscatter value corresponds to the biomass density. Each curve is based on the average data of three biological replicates and standard deviations are represented as coloured areas. Table S1. Main parameters of B. subtilis grown using different electron acceptors. n.d.: not detected; [-]: without the addition of K3[Fe(CN)6]; biomass and CO2 concentrations were not included for carbon and redox balances. Table S2. Student’s t-test results to compare the main parameters of B. subtilis growing in BES under three different conditions: t-tests have been performed via Microsoft Excel (data set of three (3 replicates), distribution tails = 1, two-sample unequal variance) to prove the null hypothesis (no difference between the conditions). To reject the null hypothesis a probability value (p-value) of lower than 0.05 has been chosen (p < 0.05 →value in bold). A: limited aeration, 1.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], AP; B: limited aeration, 1.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], OC; C: limited aeration, no K3[Fe(CN)6], AP; D: moderate aeration, 1.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], AP; E: moderate aeration, 1.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], OC.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Kokko, M. & Vassilev, I. Anode-assisted electro-fermentation with Bacillus subtilis under oxygen-limited conditions. Biotechnol Biofuels 16, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02253-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02253-4

Keywords

  • Bacillus subtilis
  • Oxygen supply
  • Anode-assisted electro-fermentation
  • Anode respiration
  • Acetoin bioproduction

Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts

ISSN: 2731-3654

Contact us