Skip to main content

Photoautotrophic cultivation of a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutant with zeaxanthin as the sole xanthophyll

Abstract

Background

Photosynthetic microalgae are known for their sustainable and eco-friendly potential to convert carbon dioxide into valuable products. Nevertheless, the challenge of self-shading due to high cell density has been identified as a drawback, hampering productivity in sustainable photoautotrophic mass cultivation. To address this issue, mutants with altered pigment composition have been proposed to allow a more efficient light diffusion but further study on the role of the different pigments is still needed to correctly engineer this process.

Results

We here investigated the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Δzl mutant with zeaxanthin as the sole xanthophyll. The Δzl mutant displayed altered pigment composition, characterized by lower chlorophyll content, higher chlorophyll a/b ratio, and lower chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio compared to the wild type (Wt). The Δzl mutant also exhibited a significant decrease in the light-harvesting complex II/Photosystem II ratio (LHCII/PSII) and the absence of trimeric LHCIIs. This significantly affects the organization and stability of PSII supercomplexes. Consequently, the estimated functional antenna size of PSII in the Δzl mutant was approximately 60% smaller compared to that of Wt, and reduced PSII activity was evident in this mutant. Notably, the Δzl mutant showed impaired non-photochemical quenching. However, the Δzl mutant compensated by exhibiting enhanced cyclic electron flow compared to Wt, seemingly offsetting the impaired PSII functionality. Consequently, the Δzl mutant achieved significantly higher cell densities than Wt under high-light conditions.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight significant changes in pigment content and pigment–protein complexes in the Δzl mutant compared to Wt, resulting in an advantage for high-density photoautotrophic cultivation. This advantage is attributed to the decreased chlorophyll content of the Δzl mutant, allowing better light penetration. In addition, the accumulated zeaxanthin in the mutant could serve as an antioxidant, offering protection against reactive oxygen species generated by chlorophylls.

Introduction

Microalgae are sustainable and eco-friendly resources that convert CO2 into useful compounds, such as biofuels and carotenoids [1]. Large-scale cultivation has less growth efficiency owing to a self-shading or mutual shading effect that inevitably occurs during high-density cultivation [2, 3]. An increase in light intensity cannot overcome this issue, because (i) the excess light energy absorbed by the external layer is wasted as fluorescence or heat emission [4] and (ii) excess light increases the risk of photodamage and photoinhibition [5].

Decreasing algal optical density to facilitate light diffusion into the inner layers has been suggested as a possible solution to improve light penetration and biomass productivity [6]. This can be achieved with “paler” strains with less pigment content [7,8,9,10,11]. These strains absorb only a small fraction of the available light, allowing the remaining light to diffuse to other layers of the photobioreactor [8]. Among the different pigments present in the photosynthetic membranes, the pigments bound to the external antenna complexes are those that can be safely decreased, while the pigments bound to the core complexes of the photosystems are crucial for photosynthesis, being the site of the photochemical reactions. Accordingly, the mutants with truncated Photosystem II (PSII) antenna grow faster and reach higher cellular concentrations than their parental strains [8, 9].

Another factor that negatively affects productivity is photoinhibition, owing to excess light energy absorbed by the photosystems, which results in photodamage. Photoinhibition is an intrinsic effect of microalgae growing inside a photobioreactor, where the bubbling and mixing system exposes the algae to sudden changes in light intensity, resulting in temporary saturation of the electron transport chain and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage cell macromolecules, limiting productivity [12]. As a solution to photoinhibition, increasing the resistance to excess absorbed light energy and ROS generation could be helpful. A viable strategy to generate algal lines with these characteristics is to modify the carotenoid composition [13, 14].

Carotenoids are divided into carotenes and xanthophylls and are distributed in different locations of the photosynthetic apparatus [15]: β-carotene is bound by the protein of the core complex and the antenna of Photosystem I (PSI), whereas xanthophylls are bound only in the light-harvesting complex (LHC). In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, different xanthophylls are present [16]: the β–β xanthophylls zeaxanthin, antheraxanthin, violaxanthin, and neoxanthin and the ε–β xanthophylls loroxanthin and lutein. All the β–β xanthophylls are derived from β-carotene that is generated from the action of lycopene β-cyclase (LCYB) on lycopene, whereas the ε–β xanthophylls are obtained by the combined action of LCYB and lycopene ε-cyclase (LCYE) [17]. Under normal light, zeaxanthin does not steadily accumulate, but is immediately converted into violaxanthin by zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) through transient mono-epoxidated antheraxanthin [17]. When the light intensity is increased, a portion of violaxanthin is converted back into zeaxanthin. In the photosynthetic apparatus, the two photosystems are organized into a reaction center and the LHC, which serve as antennae that increase the rate of light energy capture and efficiently transfer it to the reaction center [18]. The protein complexes of the photosystems bind chlorophyll a (the main pigment responsible for light absorption) and b [19]. Carotenoids play multiple roles in photosynthesis as additional pigments in photosynthetic complexes [20]. Carotenoids increase light harvesting and maintain the structure and function of photosystems [19]. They also contribute to photoprotection by scavenging ROS and dissipating energy absorbed in excess through a mechanism called non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) [4].

In C. reinhardtii, a spontaneous mutant named npq2lor1 contains only β-carotene and zeaxanthin as carotenoids [16]. The constitutive production of zeaxanthin, rather than triggered by the light regime, as in the case of the wild type (Wt), is an interesting feature of the npq2lor1 mutant, because zeaxanthin has a high nutritional value, as required by human eye health [21]. Importantly, the change in carotenoids in the npq2lor1 mutant was reported to not significantly compromise photon conversion efficiency, but resulting in a truncated light-harvesting antenna size for PSII [16]. However, mutant strains generated by random mutagenesis have been reported to carry multiple mutations, which could lead to a complex genotype to phenotype correlation [22, 23]. Therefore, the use of target-specific mutations can effectively address these concerns.

The CRISPR–Cas9 method has gained prominence in C. reinhardtii for its utility in achieving target-specific mutagenesis [24,25,26]. Recently, we employed this method to create a double knockout mutant of the LCYE and ZEP genes in C. reinhardtii and named it as Δzl [27]. Our objective was to gain deeper insights into the role of carotenoids in C. reinhardtii, in comparison to the npq2lor1 mutant, which was obtained through random insertional mutagenesis [16]. In this study, we investigated the growth pattern and photosynthetic characteristics of the Δzl mutant under photoautotrophic conditions. The Δzl mutant exhibited a higher maximum cell density compared to the Wt strain under high-light conditions, indicating that the Δzl mutant resulting from having only zeaxanthin as xanthophylls may be advantageous for photoautotrophic large-scale cultivation.

Results

Pigment content and pigment–protein complex stoichiometry of Wt and the Δzl mutant

The change in xanthophyll composition in the mutant affected chlorophyll and carotenoid distribution (Table 1). The Δzl mutant displayed ~ 60% lower chlorophyll content per cell (1.75 vs 0.67 in Wt and Δzl, respectively), higher chlorophyll a/b ratio (Chl a/b; 2.82 vs 3.65 in Wt and Δzl, respectively), and lower chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio (Chl/Car; 2.91 vs 2.28 in Wt and Δzl, respectively) compared to Wt.

Table 1 Pigment contents of Wt and the Δzl mutant grown in HS medium at 100 μmol photons m−2 s−1

The effect of this change in pigment content on the organization of photosynthetic complexes was investigated. Thylakoid membranes were isolated from the Wt and the Δzl mutant and solubilized. Different chlorophyll-binding complexes were separated by ultracentrifugation on a sucrose gradient (Fig. 1a, b). The obtained fractions corresponded, from top to bottom of sucrose gradients, to free pigments (b1), monomeric LHC (b2), trimeric LHCII (b3), PSII core complex (b4), PSI–LHCI (b5), and PSII supercomplexes (b6). The absorption spectra of each fraction from both genotypes are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1. The carotenoid distribution in each band was determined using HPLC (Fig. 1c). In the Wt, three different xanthophylls were detected in the fraction corresponding to the antenna protein (b2–3): neoxanthin, violaxanthin, and lutein. Zeaxanthin was absent in the Wt, because it did not accumulate under low-light conditions. Differently, in the Δzl mutant, zeaxanthin was the only carotenoid present. The absence of b3 from the Δzl mutant corroborates the pivotal role of lutein in trimer stability. Therefore, b2, which contains the antenna in the monomeric state, is highly increased, because it contains all dissociated LHCII. Changes in carotenoids and the absence of trimeric LHCII also affected the stability of the PSII supercomplexes (b6), which were almost absent from the Δzl mutant, whereas the intensity of the band containing the dissociated PSII core (b4) was highly increased (Fig. 1b). Also, the increase in the fraction corresponding to free pigments (b1) in the mutant suggests that the folding of LHC complexes in the presence of zeaxanthin as the sole xanthophyll is somewhat less efficient. For the PSI–LHC1 complex (b5), there was no significant difference in the native absorption spectra as well as the ratio of β-carotene mediating the binding by the core and antenna subunits. It suggests a similar PSI assembly in both strains.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Organization of photosynthetic complexes of Wt and the Δzl mutant. a Sucrose density gradient fractionation of Wt and Δzl solubilized with 0.6% dodecyl‐α‐D‐maltoside (α‐DM). The composition of the green bands is indicated on the left. b Distribution as percentages of the chlorophylls in the gradient fractions. c Carotenoid distribution in the different gradient fractions. d Thylakoid pigment–protein complexes separated by non-denaturing Deriphat PAGE. e Western blotting images used for immunotitration of thylakoid proteins using antibodies against PsaA, CP43, CP26, and LHCII. Chlorophylls (2, 1, 0.5, and 0.25 µg) were loaded on cellulose membrane. f Immunotitration of thylakoid proteins. Data were corrected by CP43 and normalized to the Wt ratio. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n = 3)

The absence of PSII supercomplexes was confirmed also by non-denaturing Deriphat–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Deriphat–PAGE), after solubilization of thylakoid membranes using dodecyl-α-D-maltoside (α-DM) (Fig. 1d). The non-denaturing electrophoresis allowed the separation of PSII supercomplexes into different bands corresponding to the dimeric core associated with different states of antenna protein aggregation. Four PSII bands were present in the Wt, but they were completely absent in the Δzl mutant, suggesting partial destabilization of PSII supercomplexes. Deriphat–PAGE confirmed the absence of trimeric LHCII and an increase in the intensity of the band corresponding to the PSII core.

The stoichiometry of the thylakoid proteins was validated using specific antibodies against PsaA, LHCII, CP26, and CP43 (Fig. 1e). PsaA and CP43 were used as representative proteins of PSI and PSII, respectively. The LHCII content was investigated using an antibody recognizing different LHCBM subunits of C. reinhardtii [28]. In the Δzl mutant, the PSI/PSII ratio was similar to the Wt, whereas the LHCII/PSII content decreased significantly (Fig. 1f). As for LHCII, the monomeric subunit CP26 was strongly decreased in the Δzl mutant with a CP26/CP43 ratio that was ~ 40% that of the Wt. These results indicate also that the reduction in chlorophyll content per cell in the Δzl mutant causes a proportional decrease of PSI and PSII per cell. Consequently, these data confirmed the antenna truncation in the mutant with zeaxanthin as the sole xanthophyll.

Light-harvesting efficiency and photosynthetic activity of Wt and the Δzl mutant

Light-harvesting efficiency of Wt and the Δzl mutant was evaluated by measuring the chlorophyll fluorescence in limiting light upon 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) treatment. DCMU is an inhibitor of the PSII electron transport and the kinetics of chlorophyll fluorescence emission in DCMU-treated cells are inversely proportional to the light-harvesting capacity of PSII. This capacity is the PSII functional antenna size and is calculated as the reciprocal of the time required to reach two-thirds of the maximal fluorescence emission [29]. According to this calculation, the Δzl mutant showed ~ 40% lower light harvesting capacity, compared to the Wt (Additional file 2: Fig. S2) in accordance with the decreased LHCII and CP26 contents.

Photosynthetic activities of the Wt and the Δzl mutant were compared at different light intensities while monitoring PSII operating efficiency (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), and photochemical quenching (1−qL) [30]. The Fv/Fm in the Δzl mutant was considerably lower than in the Wt (Fig. 2a). Consistently, the ΦPSII and ETR in the Δzl mutant were significantly lower than those of Wt but became not significantly different at light intensities higher than 900 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (Fig. 2b, c). In addition, a strong decrease in photochemical quenching was observed in the Δzl mutant (Fig. 2d). Photosynthetic activity was investigated under different actinic lights to monitor oxygen evolution. The oxygen production rate of the Δzl mutant was lower than that of the Wt at most light intensities, except for those below 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (Fig. 2e). The maximum value of oxygen production (Pmax) was lower (3.34 in the Wt vs. 2.90 in the Δzl mutant) and the light intensity needed to reach half the saturation of the oxygen evolution was higher in the mutant than in the Wt. The slope of linear increase, in the phase when oxygen evolution is proportional to the light intensity, was lower in the Δzl mutant (Additional file 7: Table S1). These results indicated that the overall photosynthetic parameter decreased in the Δzl mutant owing to a smaller antenna size.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Photosynthetic parameters. a Maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II photochemistry (Fv/Fm). b PSII operating efficiency (ΦPSII). c Relative electron transport rate (ETR). d Photochemical quenching (1‐qL) and (e) photosynthetic oxygen evolution at different actinic light intensities. Net photosynthetic rate data were fitted with the Hill equation. All data were collected from the cells grown in HS medium at 100 μmol photons m−2 s−1. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n > 3). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test (*p < 0.05)

Cyclic electron flow around the PSI of Wt and the Δzl mutant

Photosynthetic electron transport is coupled with the generation of a proton gradient across the thylakoid membrane, which is exploited as a proton motive force (PMF) to produce ATP by ATPases [31]. The PMF was measured under different actinic lights and monitored for a light-dependent carotenoid absorption electrochromic shift (ECS) [32, 33]. In the Δzl mutant, there was a lower ECS under all the light conditions tested in accordance with a lower ETR. The ECS was also measured in the presence of DCMU to inhibit PSII and the linear electron flow from PSII to PSI. The residual PMF is related to the cyclic electron flow (CEF) around the PSI. In the Wt, the ECS signal decreased strongly after DCMU treatment, whereas in the mutant, approximately 50% of the signal was still present and maintained a value considerably higher than in the Wt (Fig. 3), suggesting an increased CEF in the Δzl mutant.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Total proton motive force of Wt and the Δzl mutant. Electrochromic shift (ECS) of the carotenoid absorption spectrum was measured upon exposure to different light intensities, without (a) or with (b) the addition of DCMU. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test (*p < 0.05)

Non-photochemical quenching of Wt and the Δzl mutant

The consequence of the altered xanthophyll distribution was then evaluated in terms of photoprotection by measuring NPQ in the Wt and the Δzl mutant. NPQ was monitored in low light (50 µmol photons m−2 s−1) or high light (1200 µmol photons m−2 s−1) adapted cells grown in closed photobioreactors bubbled with ambient air (~ 0.04% CO2 concentration) or with air enriched in CO2 (5% final CO2 concentration), because CO2 availability could have an impact on the quenching. (Fig. 4a, b). In LL acclimated cells, a maximum NPQ value of 1 was measured in the Wt upon exposure to actinic light of 2400 µmol photons m−2 s−1. The additional CO2 did not have a major effect on the NPQ curve at the higher actinic light, while at the lower light intensities (below 300 µmol photons m−2 s−1) it increased the quenching. At all the actinic light tested the mutant showed a strongly decreased NPQ compared to the Wt case (Fig. 4a, b; Additional file 3: Fig. S3). In HL samples the Wt reached a higher NPQ compared to LL, as expected, because HL acclimation induces the expression of LHCSR, a trigger for NPQ in C. reinhardtii. Even in the case of HL cells, ∆zl mutant exhibited a strongly decreased NPQ compared to Wt at all the actinic light used (Fig. 4c, d; Additional file 4: Fig. S4). In HL acclimated cells the addition of CO2 slightly increased the quenching in both Wt and the mutant, but even in this case the NPQ measured for ∆zl mutant was always lower compared to the Wt case. These data show that the NPQ mechanism was strongly impaired in the Δzl mutant.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of Wt and the Δzl mutant. a, b Measurement of NPQ kinetics of low light (LL, a) or high light (HL, b) acclimated cells using actinic lights of 2400 μmol photons m−2 s−1. c, d NPQ values after 10 min of illumination with different actinic light intensities measured in low light (LL, c) or high light (HL, d) acclimated cells. Closed symbol refers to cells grown at atmospheric CO2, while open symbols to cells grown at 5% CO2. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n = 4). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test (*p < 0.05)

Growth pattern of Wt and the Δzl mutant in photoautotrophic conditions

We compared the growth of Wt and the Δzl mutant in relation to inorganic carbon availability (ambient air (~ 0.04%) and 5% CO2). Initially, cells were cultured under conditions where only CO2 in ambient air was available being naturally dissolved by flask agitation (Fig. 5). To determine the effect of light intensity, we monitored growth over 6 days at four different light intensities: 50 ± 5, 100 ± 10, 250 ± 30, and 500 ± 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Except at 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1, Δzl mutant exhibited an increase in maximum cell density at all other tested light intensities compared to Wt. Notably, at 100 ± 10 µmol photons m−2 s−1, the maximum cell density of Δzl surpassed that of Wt showing a significant rise in cell density. At 250 µmol photons m−2 s−1, the Δzl mutant achieved a cell density over 45% higher than Wt. This difference in growth was even more evident at the highest light intensity of 500 ± 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1. The extended growth period shown in Fig. 5d clearly illustrates that the Δzl mutant maintains robust growth beyond the stationary phase typically observed in Wt.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Growth patterns of Wt and the Δzl mutant in photoautotrophic cultivation (ambient air). The carbon source was supplied by naturally dissolved air during agitating. Cell growth was measured under 50 ± 5 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (a), 100 ± 10 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (b), 250 ± 30 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (c), and 500 ± 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (d). The long-term experiment at 500 ± 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1 was displayed in the box. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n > 2). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test (*p < 0.05)

Next, we examined cell growth at higher CO2 availability providing air with CO2 concentration increased at 5%. We chose to experiment with three specific light intensity ranges: 50 ± 5, 100 ± 10, and 500 ± 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1. The results from these tests are presented in Fig. 6. With high CO2 availability, cell growth rates of both strains tended to be faster, but at 50 and 100 µmol photons m−2 s−1, the Δzl mutant grew more slowly than the Wt. Interestingly, at 500 µmol photons m−2 s−1, the Wt cells peaked in density on day 3, whereas the cell density of the Δzl mutant increased even after day 3.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Growth patterns of Wt and the Δzl mutant in photoautotrophic cultivation (5% CO2). The carbon source was supplied by 5% CO2 bubbling. Cell growth was measured under 50 ± 5 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (a), 100 ± 10 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (b), and 500 ± 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1 (c). All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n > 2). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test (*p < 0.05)

Taken together, these results indicate that the Δzl mutant sustains a growth advantage, consistently reaching greater cell densities in the high light conditions, regardless of CO2 concentrations.

Discussion

Herein, we investigated the C. reinhardtii Δzl mutant obtained from a target-specific double knockout of the ZEP and LCYE genes. Previously, the npq2lor1 mutant was obtained by mutagenesis of the lor1 mutant by phenotypic screening [16]. However, random mutagenesis followed by phenotypic screening may generate hundreds of mutations resulting in unpredictable gene mutations and growth conditions [22, 23]. Therefore, the characterization of the Δzl mutant helps to clarify and update the previous knowledge obtained from the npq2lor1 mutant. In addition, we discuss the advantages of the Δzl mutant, which has a smaller antenna for photoautotrophic cultivation based on the photosynthetic parameters analysis.

Δzl mutation affected the organization of the PSII supercomplexes

The LHCII/PSII and CP26/PSII contents were strongly diminished in the Δzl mutant and trimeric LHCIIs were completely destabilized. LHCII binds 14 chlorophyll molecules and four molecules of carotenoids (two lutein molecules, one violaxanthin molecule, and one neoxanthin molecule) [35]. The carotenoid-binding sites are specific for different xanthophylls; L1 and L2 at the center of the protein bind lutein, whereas the external sites V1 and N1 bind violaxanthin (or zeaxanthin) and neoxanthin, respectively [36]. Studies on different mutants and in vitro reconstitution of antennae proteins have shown that lutein, violaxanthin, and zeaxanthin can bind to sites L1 and L2, but trimers can only be formed if lutein is present [37]. This indicates that LHCII trimer formation in vivo requires lutein alone, which is sufficient for trimerization. Indeed, the LHCII proteins seem to be present in the Δzl mutant but essentially in a monomeric state. Consequently, the absence of an LHCII trimer in the Δzl mutant affected the organization of the PSII supercomplexes and their stability.

Δzl mutation weakened the chlorophyll stability of the PSII antenna

The decreased LHCII/PSII ratio in the Δzl mutant affected its PSII light-harvesting capacity. The estimated functional antenna size of PSII in the Δzl mutant was approximately 60% that of the Wt (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). The PSI/PSII ratio remained comparable between the two genotypes, suggesting that the decrease in chlorophyll had a uniform impact on both photosystems in the Δzl mutant.

The chlorophyll content was markedly lower in the Δzl mutant (0.67 pg/cell) than Wt (1.75 pg/cell), likely related to the altered carotenoid composition and diminished PSII supercomplexes. Moreover, the Chl a/b ratio increased because of a decrease in chlorophyll b-binding antenna subunits. The Chl/Car ratio was decreased in the Δzl mutant, implying a higher decrease of chlorophylls with respect to carotenoids. Carotenoids can also be present in the membrane, where they function as scavengers of ROS, whereas chlorophyll is maintained only inside the subunits of photosynthetic complexes [4, 20, 36, 37]. Nevertheless, not only chlorophyll but also carotenoid content was decreased on a cell basis in the Δzl mutant, even if the effect was stronger on the chlorophyll content per cell.

Δzl mutation caused a proportional decrease in PSI and PSII

The Δzl mutant showed a decreased chlorophyll content (60% less than Wt) but the ratio between PSII and PSI, measured by immunotitration or native complexes densitometry, was similar between the two genotypes. These results indicate that the reduction in chlorophyll content per cell in the Δzl mutant causes a proportional decrease in PSI and PSII per cell. To evaluate if the change of xanthophyll composition has an effect also on the functionality of PSI, its photochemical activity was measured on complexes isolated on the sucrose gradient following the kinetics of P700 oxidation upon light exposure (Additional file 5: Fig. S5). The oxidation of PSI (monitored as ∆ absorbance at 830 nm) is only slightly reduced in the mutant. This result can be explained by a lower photochemical efficiency in zeaxanthin-binding PSI due to the presence of some constitutive zeaxanthin-dependent energy quenching mechanisms, as previously reported in the case of zeaxanthin-binding PSI of Chlorella vulgaris [38]. Nevertheless, we can conclude that the effect of the changes of xanthophylls in Δzl mutant is more evident in the case of PSII than PSI. The PSI can bind in its antenna complexes also the β carotene while PSII antenna bind only xanthophylls. The pigments distribution in the isolated complexes (Fig. 1c) showed that β carotene was present in similar percentage in Wt and the Δzl mutant PSI (b5); this can explain the higher stability of PSI with respect to PSII.

Photosynthetic activity decreased significantly in the Δzl mutant

In addition to decreased Fv/Fm, the Δzl mutant was characterized by lower operating efficiency, ETR, 1−qL, and O2 evolution. This indicates that a diminished light-harvesting efficiency results in decreased photosynthetic activity, especially lower light intensities (50 and 100 µmol photons m−2 s−1), which cannot supply sufficient light energy to the electron transport chain. This may be why the Δzl mutant, which has a reduced ability to harvest available photons, initially grows slower than Wt at the lower light regimes.

This O2 evolution was different from the results of other mutants with truncated antenna size or with decreased pigment content, where the Pmax was usually reported higher than Wt [6]. The reduced Pmax observed in Δzl mutant can be explained considering that the constitutive accumulation of zeaxanthin in C. reinhardtii has been previously demonstrated to induce a constitutive quenching mechanism that decreases the photosynthetic efficiency [39]. However, it is important to note that even in the case of npq2lor1 mutant increased Pmax was measured compared to the Wt [16]: another possible explanation is related to the cell wall. The npq2lor1 mutant has been derived from strains with an intact cell wall [16]. In contrast, our Δzl mutant was obtained from a cell wall-less strain (CC4349) [27]. The periplasmic region situated between the cell wall and cell membrane may play a significant role in the conversion of CO2 to bicarbonate by carbonic anhydrase 1, which is present in the periplasmic space [40]. This difference in the carbon uptake and utilization process might be responsible for the observed variations. The other possible explanation is the effect of unexpected gene mutations in the npq2lor1 mutant, which was isolated as a spontaneous mutation. However, our results cannot be clearly interpreted, and thus a comparative study between the Δzl and npq2lor1 mutants should be performed to clarify this issue.

CEF compensated for the impaired PSII in the Δzl mutant

The light energy absorbed by the photosystem is directed toward the electron transport chain to generate a proton gradient for ATPase activity and NADPH [31]. The generation of a proton gradient is related to the efficiency of light capture by the photosystems [31] and can be measured by monitoring the carotenoid change in absorption after illumination (ECS). Consistent with decreased photosynthetic efficiency in the Δzl mutant, the ECS of the Δzl mutant was lower than that of Wt. The CEF contributed less than 10% of the total ECS in the Wt, but approximately 50% in the Δzl mutant, suggesting the importance of CEF in generating PMF in the Δzl mutant. The ECS signal showed that the Δzl mutant generates a lower amount of protons when illuminated consistent with reduced photosynthetic efficiency. When the measure was repeated adding DCMU, to inhibit linear electron transport from PSII to PSI, the proton generation resulted higher in the mutant than in the Wt implying a higher cyclic electron transport (since the linear transport was inhibited). The mutant compensates for the reduced electron flow from the PSII, which in the Δzl has a reduced efficiency and stability, increasing the one around PSI to generate enough proton gradient to sustain ATPase activity. Therefore, the Δzl mutant seems to compensate for the diminished efficiency and stability of PSII by increasing the electron flow around PSI to generate enough proton gradient to sustain ATPase activity.

Δzl mutant exhibited an impaired NPQ mechanism

The Δzl mutant exhibited a defect in NPQ, a pivotal protective mechanism against light stress, independent of the amount of available inorganic carbon (Fig. 4). This seems to be an effect of both the absence of lutein and the knockout of ZEP. Lutein is directly involved in the quenching of chlorophyll-excited states in the antenna via energy transfer from chlorophyll to the S1 state of carotenoids [4, 41]. The npq1 mutant, which does not accumulate zeaxanthin, showed NPQ similar to that of the Wt, but the double mutant npq1lor1 showed a considerable decrease in NPQ [42]. According to single-molecule analysis using the 2D-fluorescence correlation analysis, C. reinhardtii appears to have pH-dependent and zeaxanthin-dependent quenching systems [39]. Zeaxanthin-dependent quenching was also observed at neutral pH, and a decrease in fluorescence lifetime was observed in the zep mutant [39]. This could explain also the strong decrease of Fv/Fm in the Δzl mutant.

In addition to the specific roles of lutein and zeaxanthin, changes in xanthophyll content can indirectly affect NPQ by disturbing the assembly and structure of the PSII antenna. Indeed, CP26 knockout mutants defective in antenna structures show a strong decrease in NPQ [43, 44]. The lower PSII antenna content in the Δzl mutant could affect the NPQ, because the antenna proteins are the subunits interacting with LHCSR.

Δzl mutant has an advantage in high-density cultivation at HL conditions

Although a defective PSII light-harvesting complex and an impaired NPQ mechanism, the Δzl mutant reached higher cellular concentration than the Wt at 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1. This is probably related to the 60% lower Chl content in the mutant than its parental strain. The lower chlorophyll content and smaller PSII antenna size in the Δzl mutant absorbed less light per cell, allowing better light penetration and greater light availability for the inner layers.

Despite a severe decrease in NPQ in the Δzl mutant, the growth was not inhibited at 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1. The NPQ mechanism is important to protect from changes in light intensity that temporarily saturate photochemistry, whereas it is less important in continuous high-light conditions [45, 46]. In addition, the deficit in NPQ could be compensated for by the antioxidant characteristics of zeaxanthin [47]. Our results showed that the Δzl mutant accumulated 60 and 72 times higher zeaxanthin content than Wt in the cells adapted to 100 and 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1, respectively (Additional file 6: Fig. S6). Zeaxanthin has higher antioxidant activity than other xanthophylls and its constitutive accumulation seems to protect the mutant cells from ROS [48,49,50]. Indeed, C. vulgaris mutants selected for their higher resistance to ROS or accumulation of more carotenoids showed higher productivity in laboratory-scale photobioreactors [9]. In addition, a strain of C. reinhardtii engineered to accumulate the strong antioxidant ketocarotenoid astaxanthin as a major carotenoid outcompeted its parental background in terms of biomass productivity [12, 51]. More carotenoids per chlorophyll a in the Δzl mutant have more probability of scavenging the ROS generated by chlorophylls. Therefore, the constitutive accumulation of zeaxanthin seems to enable growth under HL conditions by forming a continuously quenched state [42]. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the characteristics of the Δzl mutant, which had a smaller antenna size and accumulated large amounts of the antioxidant zeaxanthin, are advantageous in high-density cultivation.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and culture conditions

C. reinhardtii CC4349 (cw15, mt-) (Wt) and the knockout mutant of zeaxanthin epoxidase and lycopene ε-cyclase (Δzl2 in the previous study; Δzl) [27] were cultivated photoautotrophically. For growth tests at ambient air conditions (0.04% CO2), cells were inoculated into 50 mL of high-salt (HS) medium in a 250 mL flask covered with aluminum foil. The carbon source was dissolved naturally in air with agitation. For growth tests under high CO2 conditions, cells were inoculated into 80 mL of HS medium in a 250 mL flask closed with a vent plug. The 5% CO2 was supplied by bubbling at a rate of 80 mL min−1. Due to the rapid evaporation of the medium by bubbling, we increased the culture volume to 80 mL, as opposed to air conditions, using 50 mL of the culture medium. The culture flasks were continuously agitated on an orbital shaker (120 rpm) at 25 ± 1 °C under continuous light conditions (50 ± 5, 100 ± 10, 250 ± 30, and 500 ± 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1). All experiments were conducted using seed cultures adapted to each light intensity for more than 2 weeks.

Pigment analysis

The cell culture (0.5 mL) was harvested by centrifugation (20,000 × g for 2 min) and the supernatant was discarded. For spectral analysis, the pigments were extracted in 80% (w/w) acetone. The mixture was centrifuged (20,000 × g for 5 min) and the absorbance of the supernatant was determined using a spectrophotometer. The total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were calculated according to Lichtenthaler’s formula [52]. For HPLC analysis, the pigments were extracted in 0.5 mL of 90% (w/w) acetone incubation for 1 min. After centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 5 min, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm nylon filter. The filtrate was analyzed using a Shimadzu Prominence high-performance liquid chromatography system (model LC-20AD; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Waters Spherisorb S5 ODS1 cartridge column (4.6 × 250 mm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) [53]. The pigment concentrations in the extracts were normalized to the sample biomass.

The biomass (dry cell weight) was measured as follows; 10 mL of cell culture was harvested by centrifugation at 2500 × g for 10 min at 20 °C. The cells were resuspended and transferred to a pre-weighed 1.5 mL EP tube (A). After lyophilization for at least 2 h until the weight remained unchanged, the tubes were reweighed (B). Net dry weight was calculated as “(B) − (A)”.

Thylakoid membrane isolation, gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotting

Thylakoid membranes were isolated as previously described [54]: For fractionation of pigment–protein complexes, membranes corresponding to 500 μg of Chlorophylls were washed with 5 mM EDTA and then solubilized in 1 ml of 0.8% α-DM and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8. Solubilized samples were then fractionated by ultracentrifugation in a 0.1–1 M sucrose gradient containing 0.03% α-DM and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8 (22 h at 280,000 g, 4 °C). SDS–PAGE was performed using the Tris-Tricine buffer system [55] followed by Coomassie blue staining. For immunotitration, thylakoid samples were loaded and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, which were quantified using an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody system. α-PsaA (AS06 172), α-CP43 (AS11 1787), α-CP26 (AS09 407), and α-LHCII (AS01 003) antibodies were purchased from Agrisera (Sweden). Non-denaturing Deriphat–PAGE was performed as described previously [56]. Thylakoids concentrated at 1 mg mL−1 of total chlorophyll were solubilized with a final 0.8% α-DM, and a sample equivalent to 30 μg of total chlorophyll was loaded into each lane.

Photosynthetic activity

The photosynthetic parameters ΦPSII, ETR, qL, and NPQ were obtained by measuring chlorophyll fluorescence with a DUAL–PAM-100 fluorimeter (Heinz–Walz) at 25 °C in a 1 × 1 cm cuvette mixed by magnetic stirring. ΦPSII, ETR, and qL were measured and calculated according to [30] and [57] at steady-state photosynthesis upon 20 min of illumination. NPQ measurements were performed on dark-adapted intact cells as described previously [43] with the following modifications: cells were adapted to 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1 only for two days before NPQ measurements, and far-red light exposure was performed for 15 min before turning on the actinic light. PSII functional antenna size was measured from fast chlorophyll induction kinetics induced with a red light of 11 μmol photons m−2 s−1 on dark-adapted cells (~ 2 × 106 cells/mL) incubated with 50 μM DCMU. The reciprocal of time corresponding to two-thirds of the fluorescence rise (τ2/3) was taken as a measure of the PSII functional antenna size [58]. The oxygen evolution activity of the cultures was measured at 25 °C with a Clark-type O2 electrode (Hansatech), as described previously [43]. The PMF upon exposure to different light intensities was measured by Electrochromic Shift (ECS) with MultispeQ v2.0 (PhotosynQ) according to Kuhlgert et al. MultispeQ Beta: A tool for large-scale plant phenotyping connected to an open photosynQ network [59]. Maximum P700 activity was measured after a pulse of saturating light in whole cells treated with DCMU (3-[3,4-dichlorophenyl]-1,1-dimethylurea), ascorbate and methylviologen, as described in (Cecchin Plant Cell and Environment 2021).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files.

Abbreviations

Wt:

Wild type

ML:

Moderate light

HL:

High-light

Δzl :

Zeaxanthin-accumulating mutant

PSI:

Photosystem I

PSII:

Photosystem II

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

LHC:

Light-harvesting complex

LHCI:

Light-harvesting complex I

LHCII:

Light-harvesting complex II

LCYB:

Lycopene β-cyclase

LCYE:

Lycopene ε-cyclase

NPQ:

Non-photochemical quenching

DCMU:

3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea

ΦPSII:

PSII operating efficiency

ETR:

Electron transport rate

PMF:

Proton motive force

ECS:

Electrochromic shift

CEF:

Cyclic electron flow

References

  1. Pulz O, Gross W. Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;65(6):635–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma YC, Singh B, Korstad J. A critical review on recent methods used for economically viable and eco-friendly development of microalgae as a potential feedstock for synthesis of biodiesel. Green Chem. 2011;13(11):2993–3006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Narala RR, Garg S, Sharma KK, Thomas-Hall SR, Deme M, Li Y, Schenk PM. Comparison of microalgae cultivation in photobioreactor, open raceway pond, and a two-stage hybrid system. Front Energy Res. 2016;4:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruban AV, Berera R, Ilioaia C, van Stokkum IH, Kennis JT, Pascal AA, Van Amerongen H, Robert B, Horton P, van Grondelle R. Identification of a mechanism of photoprotective energy dissipation in higher plants. Nature. 2007;450(7169):575–8.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simionato D, Basso S, Giacometti GM, Morosinotto T. Optimization of light use efficiency for biofuel production in algae. Biophys Chem. 2013;182:71–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Polle JE, Kanakagiri S, Jin E, Masuda T, Melis A. Truncated chlorophyll antenna size of the photosystems—a practical method to improve microalgal productivity and hydrogen production in mass culture. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27(11–12):1257–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirst H, Garcia-Cerdan JG, Zurbriggen A, Ruehle T, Melis A. Truncated photosystem chlorophyll antenna size in the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii upon deletion of the TLA3-CpSRP43 gene. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(4):2251–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cazzaniga S, Dall’Osto L, Szaub J, Scibilia L, Ballottari M, Purton S, Bassi R. Domestication of the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana: reduction of antenna size improves light-use efficiency in a photobioreactor. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dall’Osto L, Cazzaniga S, Guardini Z, Barera S, Benedetti M, Mannino G, Maffei ME, Bassi R. Combined resistance to oxidative stress and reduced antenna size enhance light-to-biomass conversion efficiency in Chlorella vulgaris cultures. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeong J, Baek K, Kirst H, Melis A, Jin E. Loss of CpSRP54 function leads to a truncated light-harvesting antenna size in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA Bioenergetics. 2017;1858(1):45–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeong J, Baek K, Yu J, Kirst H, Betterle N, Shin W, Bae S, Melis A, Jin E. Deletion of the chloroplast LTD protein impedes LHCI import and PSI–LHCI assembly in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(5):1147–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cazzaniga S, Perozeni F, Baier T, Ballottari M. Engineering astaxanthin accumulation reduces photoinhibition and increases biomass productivity under high light in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022;15(1):77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dall’Osto L, Fiore A, Cazzaniga S, Giuliano G, Bassi R. Different roles of α-and β-branch xanthophylls in photosystem assembly and photoprotection. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(48):35056–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niyogi KK, Bjorkman O, Grossman AR. Chlamydomonas xanthophyll cycle mutants identified by video imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence quenching. Plant Cell. 1997;9(8):1369–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Britton G. Structure and properties of carotenoids in relation to function. FASEB J. 1995;9(15):1551–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Polle JE, Niyogi KK, Melis A. Absence of lutein, violaxanthin and neoxanthin affects the functional chlorophyll antenna size of photosystem-II but not that of photosystem-I in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42(5):482–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lohr M, Im C-S, Grossman AR. Genome-based examination of chlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol. 2005;138(1):490–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Eberhard S, Finazzi G, Wollman F-A. The dynamics of photosynthesis. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:463–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Naschberger A, Mosebach L, Tobiasson V, Kuhlgert S, Scholz M, Perez-Boerema A, Ho TTH, Vidal-Meireles A, Takahashi Y, Hippler M, et al. Algal photosystem I dimer and high-resolution model of PSI-plastocyanin complex. Nature Plants. 2022;8(10):1191–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Demmig-Adams B, Gilmore AM, Iii WWA. In vivo functions of carotenoids in higher plants. FASEB J. 1996;10(4):403–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mares J. Lutein and zeaxanthin isomers in eye health and disease. Annu Rev Nutr. 2016;36(1):571–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cecchin M, Cazzaniga S, Martini F, Paltrinieri S, Bossi S, Maffei ME, Ballottari M. Astaxanthin and eicosapentaenoic acid production by S4, a new mutant strain of Nannochloropsis gaditana. Microb Cell Fact. 2022;21(1):117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cecchin M, Berteotti S, Paltrinieri S, Vigliante I, Iadarola B, Giovannone B, Maffei ME, Delledonne M, Ballottari M. Improved lipid productivity in Nannochloropsis gaditana in nitrogen-replete conditions by selection of pale green mutants. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13(1):78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeong B-r, Jang J, Jin E. Genome engineering via gene editing technologies in microalgae. Bioresour Technol. 2023;371:128701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baek K, Kim DH, Jeong J, Sim SJ, Melis A, Kim J-S, Jin E, Bae S. DNA-free two-gene knockout in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Song I, Kim S, Kim J, Oh H, Jang J, Jeong SJ, Baek K, Shin W-S, Sim SJ, Jin E. Macular pigment-enriched oil production from genome-edited microalgae. Microb Cell Fact. 2022;21(1):27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Song I, Kim J, Baek K, Choi Y, Shin B, Jin E. The generation of metabolic changes for the production of high-purity zeaxanthin mediated by CRISPR-Cas9 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Girolomoni L, Ferrante P, Berteotti S, Giuliano G, Bassi R, Ballottari M. The function of LHCBM4/6/8 antenna proteins in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(3):627–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Bianchi S, Dall’Osto L, Tognon G, Morosinotto T, Bassi R. Minor antenna proteins CP24 and CP26 affect the interactions between photosystem II subunits and the electron transport rate in grana membranes of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20(4):1012–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Baker NR. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. AnnuRevPlant Biol. 2008;59:89–113.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kramer DM, Avenson TJ, Edwards GE. Dynamic flexibility in the light reactions of photosynthesis governed by both electron and proton transfer reactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(7):349–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bailleul B, Cardol P, Breyton C, Finazzi G. Electrochromism: a useful probe to study algal photosynthesis. PhotosynthRes. 2010;106(1–2):179–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lucker B, Kramer DM. Regulation of cyclic electron flow in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under fluctuating carbon availability. Photosynth Res. 2013;117(1–3):449–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Steen CJ, Burlacot A, Short AH, Niyogi KK, Fleming GR. Interplay between LHCSR proteins and state transitions governs the NPQ response in Chlamydomonas during light fluctuations. Plant, Cell Environ. 2022;45(8):2428–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Salvadori E, Di Valentin M, Kay CW, Pedone A, Barone V, Carbonera D. The electronic structure of the lutein triplet state in plant light-harvesting complex II. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14(35):12238–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dall’Osto L, Lico C, Alric J, Giuliano G, Havaux M, Bassi R. Lutein is needed for efficient chlorophyll triplet quenching in the major LHCII antenna complex of higher plants and effective photoprotection in vivounder strong light. BMC Plant Biol. 2006;6(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Carbonera D, Agostini A, Bortolus M, Dall’Osto L, Bassi R. Violaxanthin and zeaxanthin may replace lutein at the L1 site of LHCII, conserving the interactions with surrounding chlorophylls and the capability of triplet-triplet energy transfer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):4812.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Girolomoni L, Bellamoli F, de la Cruz VG, Perozeni F, D’Andrea C, Cerullo G, Cazzaniga S, Ballottari M. Evolutionary divergence of photoprotection in the green algal lineage: a plant-like violaxanthin de-epoxidase enzyme activates the xanthophyll cycle in the green alga Chlorella vulgaris modulating photoprotection. New Phytol. 2020;228(1):136–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Troiano JM, Perozeni F, Moya R, Zuliani L, Baek K, Jin E, Cazzaniga S, Ballottari M, Schlau-Cohen GS. Identification of distinct pH-and zeaxanthin-dependent quenching in LHCSR3 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Elife. 2021;10:e60383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Moroney JV, Ynalvez RA. Proposed carbon dioxide concentrating mechanism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6(8):1251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Avenson TJ, Ahn TK, Niyogi KK, Ballottari M, Bassi R, Fleming GR. Lutein can act as a switchable charge transfer quencher in the CP26 light-harvesting complex. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(5):2830–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baroli I, Do AD, Yamane T, Niyogi KK. Zeaxanthin accumulation in the absence of a functional xanthophyll cycle protects Chlamydomonas reinhardtii from photooxidative stress. Plant Cell. 2003;15(4):992–1008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cazzaniga S, Kim M, Bellamoli F, Jeong J, Lee S, Perozeni F, Pompa A, Jin E, Ballottari M. Photosystem II antenna complexes CP26 and CP29 are essential for nonphotochemical quenching in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant, Cell Environ. 2020;43(2):496–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cazzaniga S, Kim M, Pivato M, Perozeni F, Sardar S, D’Andrea C, Jin E, Ballottari M. Photosystem II monomeric antenna CP26 plays a key role in nonphotochemical quenching in Chlamydomonas. Plant Physiol. 2023;193(2):1365–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Elrad D, Niyogi KK, Grossman AR. A major light-harvesting polypeptide of photosystem II functions in thermal dissipation. Plant Cell. 2002;14(8):1801–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nilkens M, Kress E, Lambrev P, Miloslavina Y, Müller M, Holzwarth AR, Jahns P. Identification of a slowly inducible zeaxanthin-dependent component of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence generated under steady-state conditions in Arabidopsis. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA Bioenergetics. 2010;1797(4):466–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Havaux M, Niyogi KK. The violaxanthin cycle protects plants from photooxidative damage by more than one mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96(15):8762–7.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Havaux M, Dall’Osto L, Bassi R. Zeaxanthin has enhanced antioxidant capacity with respect to all other xanthophylls in Arabidopsis leaves and functions independent of binding to PSII antennae. Plant Physiol. 2007;145(4):1506–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dall’Osto L, Cazzaniga S, Havaux M, Bassi R. Enhanced photoprotection by protein-bound vs free xanthophyll pools: a comparative analysis of chlorophyll b and xanthophyll biosynthesis mutants. Mol Plant. 2010;3(3):576–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dall’Osto L, Holt NE, Kaligotla S, Fuciman M, Cazzaniga S, Carbonera D, Frank HA, Alric J, Bassi R. Zeaxanthin protects plant photosynthesis by modulating chlorophyll triplet yield in specific light-harvesting antenna subunits. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(50):41820–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Perozeni F, Cazzaniga S, Baier T, Zanoni F, Zoccatelli G, Lauersen KJ, Wobbe L, Ballottari M. Turning a green alga red: engineering astaxanthin biosynthesis by intragenic pseudogene revival in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(10):2053–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987;148:350–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Park S, Jung G, Hwang Y-s, Jin E. Dynamic response of the transcriptome of a psychrophilic diatom, Chaetoceros neogracile, to high irradiance. Planta. 2010;231(2):349–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bonente G, Howes BD, Caffarri S, Smulevich G, Bassi R. Interactions between the photosystem II subunit PsbS and xanthophylls studied in vivo and in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(13):8434–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Schägger H, von Jagow G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. AnalBiochem. 1987;166:368–79.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Peter GF, Takeuchi T, Thornber JP. Solubilization and two-dimensional electrophoretic procedures for studying the organization and composition of photosynthetic membrane polypeptides. Methods A Companion Methods Enzymol. 1991;3:115–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Van Kooten O, Snel JFH. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. PhotosyntRes. 1990;25:147–50.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Malkin S, Armond PA, Mooney HA, Fork DC. Photosystem II photosynthetic unit sizes from fluorescence induction in leaves: correlation to photosynthetic capacity. Plant Physiol. 1981;67(3):570–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kuhlgert S, Austic G, Zegarac R, Osei-Bonsu I, Hoh D, Chilvers MI, Roth MG, Bi K, TerAvest D, Weebadde P. MultispeQ Beta: a tool for large-scale plant phenotyping connected to the open PhotosynQ network. Royal Soc Open Sci. 2016;3(10):160592.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (grant no. NRF2020R1A2C2011998) to E.J. and by the European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant SOLENALGAE (679814) to M.B. We especially thank Byong Cheol Shin (Arca Eir), who shared the rights to the patent.

Funding

E.J., National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (grant no. NRF2020R1A2C2011998); M.B., European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant SOLENALGAE (679814).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK, SC, MB, and EJ designed and moderated this study. MK, SC, JJ. MP and GK performed the experiments. MK and SC drafted the manuscript. MK, SC, JJ, MP, GK. MB and EJ revised the manuscript. All authors analyzed and contributed to data interpretation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matteo Ballottari or EonSeon Jin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Native absorption spectra of the different fractions. Absorption spectra (ABS) in the 350-750 nm region are reported as optical density. For each sample the absorption spectrum was normalized to the maximal absorption peak in the 600–740 nm region.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Functional PSII antenna size. The inset indicates the calculated value normalized to Wt. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n = 3).

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) at different light intensities measured in WT and Δzl low light acclimated cells. Cells of Wt (black) and Δzl (red) acclimated to low light conditions were illuminated with actinic lights of 150 (a), 300 (b), 600 (c), 1200 (d) μmol photons m in order to obtain NPQ kinetic. Closed symbol refers to cells grown at atmospheric CO2, while open symbols to cells grown at 5% CO2. Error bars are reported as standard deviation (n=4).

Additional file 4: Figure S4.

Nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) at different light intensities measured in WT and Δzl high light acclimated cells. Cells of Wt (black) and Δzl (red) acclimated to high light conditions were illuminated with actinic lights of 150 (a), 300 (b), 600 (c), 1200 (d) μmol photons m in order to obtain NPQ kinetic. Closed symbol refers to cells grown at atmospheric CO2, while open symbols to cells grown at 5% CO2. Error bars are reported as standard deviation (n=4).

Additional file 5: Figure S5.

Kinetics of P700 oxidation upon light exposure. Light-dependent P700 oxidation of isolated Wt and ∆zl PSI in detergent on a chlorophyll basis. P700 activity was measured after a pulse of saturating light in whole cells treated with DCMU (3-[3,4-dichlorophenyl]-1,1-dimethylurea), ascorbate and methylviologen. Delta absorbance of P700 at 830 nm was used as a measurement of the PSI redox state.

Additional file 6: Figure S6.

Pigment content (mg g DCW−1). Cells were cultured at 100 ± 10 µmol photons m−2 s−1 and 500 ± 50 µmol photons m−2 s−1. The pigment contents were analyzed using the samples collected 4 days after inoculation. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n = 3). Pigment abbreviations; neoxanthin (Nx), violaxanthin (Vx), antheraxanthin (Ax), lutein (Lut), zeaxanthin (Zx), α-carotene (α-Car), and β-carotene (β-Car). Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test (*p < 0.05).

Additional file 7: Table S1.

Photosynthesis and respiration rates. The parameters extrapolated from the oxygen–light saturation curves are shown in Figure 2e. All the experiment was performed in biological replicates (n > 3). The Δzl mutant values that are significantly different (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05) from wild-type (Wt) are marked with an asterisk (*).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M., Cazzaniga, S., Jang, J. et al. Photoautotrophic cultivation of a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutant with zeaxanthin as the sole xanthophyll. Biotechnol Biofuels 17, 41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-024-02483-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-024-02483-8

Keywords