Open Access

Development of a genome-editing CRISPR/Cas9 system in thermophilic fungal Myceliophthora species and its application to hyper-cellulase production strain engineering

Biotechnology for Biofuels201710:1

Received: 14 August 2016

Accepted: 20 December 2016

Published: 3 January 2017



Over the past 3 years, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has revolutionized the field of genome engineering. However, its application has not yet been validated in thermophilic fungi. Myceliophthora thermophila, an important thermophilic biomass-degrading fungus, has attracted industrial interest for the production of efficient thermostable enzymes. Genetic manipulation of Myceliophthora is crucial for metabolic engineering and to unravel the mechanism of lignocellulose deconstruction. The lack of a powerful, versatile genome-editing tool has impeded the broader exploitation of M. thermophila in biotechnology.


In this study, a CRISPR/Cas9 system for efficient multiplexed genome engineering was successfully developed in the thermophilic species M. thermophila and M. heterothallica. This CRISPR/Cas9 system could efficiently mutate the imported amdS gene in the genome via NHEJ-mediated events. As a proof of principle, the genes of the cellulase production pathway, including cre-1, res-1, gh1-1, and alp-1, were chosen as editing targets. Simultaneous multigene disruptions of up to four of these different loci were accomplished with neomycin selection marker integration via a single transformation using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Using this genome-engineering tool, multiple strains exhibiting pronounced hyper-cellulase production were generated, in which the extracellular secreted protein and lignocellulase activities were significantly increased (up to 5- and 13-fold, respectively) compared with the parental strain.


A genome-wide engineering system for thermophilic fungi was established based on CRISPR/Cas9. Successful expansion of this system without modification to M. heterothallica indicates it has wide adaptability and flexibility for use in other Myceliophthora species. This system could greatly accelerate strain engineering of thermophilic fungi for production of industrial enzymes, such as cellulases as shown in this study and possibly bio-based fuels and chemicals in the future.


Myceliophthora CRISPR/Cas9 system Thermophilic fungi Cellulases


Lignocellulosic biomass is an abundant renewable, conventional energy source for many industrial applications [1, 2]. Through their secretion of large amounts of lignocellulolytic enzymes to break down lignocellulose to fermentable sugar, saprobic ascomycete and basidiomycete filamentous fungi are the main decomposers of plant biomass [3]. The thermophilic filamentous fungus Myceliophthora thermophila is exceptionally attractive for biotechnological applications, with multiple characteristics of industrial interest, such as high-temperature fermentation, substantial protein secretion capacity, and fast growth on cellulose [48]. Consequently, M. thermophila has been developed into a platform for industrial enzyme production (C1 strain) [9] and also has the biotechnological potential to be a cell factory to produce chemicals and biofuels from biomass polysaccharides [7]. The genome of the M. thermophila wild-type (WT) strain ATCC 42464 has been completely sequenced and annotated [10], thereby allowing systematic examination and identification of lignocellulolytic enzymes cultured in defined plant-derived biomass through transcriptome and exoproteome approaches [5, 11].

Recently, a high-efficiency Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation system was developed by our group for the sequenced M. thermophila strain ATCC 42464 [12]. Using this technique, a ku70 deletion strain was constructed. The homologous recombination (HR) rate was improved approximately threefold in the Δku70 mutant, thereby facilitating the high-throughput generation of single-gene deletions of M. thermophila. However, although classical gene deletion approaches using homologous integration with flanking regions longer than 1000-bp have been applied in filamentous fungi [13], they are technically complicated and time intensive, particularly for multiple gene engineering. Because no sexual cycle has yet been found in M. thermophila, multiple gene disruption cannot be achieved by sexual crossing. Thus, the lack of a powerful and versatile genome-editing tool for M. thermophila impedes wider biotechnological exploitation of this fungus.

The type-II prokaryotic clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas adaptive immune system has recently been engineered into a powerful genome-editing system and has been broadly applied across species [1424]. Briefly, this system consists of a Cas9 endonuclease and a synthetic single chimeric guide RNA (sgRNA), the latter a fusion of CRISPR RNA (crRNA) and trans-activating crRNA (tracrRNA). In the commonly used form of Cas9, the sgRNA consists of a 20-bp protospacer sequence recognizing the target site by base pairing and a downstream gRNA scaffold sequence. The target DNA must contain the 20-bp genomic target sequences followed by the requisite 3-bp protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) 5′-NGG. The mature gRNA guides Cas9 to specific 20-nucleotide genomic loci, and Cas9 then introduces a double-strand break (DSB) at the target DNA upstream of the PAM. A DSB generated by Cas9 can be repaired by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) to directly carry out indel mutagenesis; alternatively, homology-directed repair (HDR) can be accomplished if a DNA repair template (donor DNA) is simultaneously provided with the sgRNA. Besides introducing DSBs, recent studies have shown that a catalytically inactive dCas9 protein lacking endonuclease activity can efficiently generate a RNA-guided regulation platform for sequence-specific control of gene repression (CRISPRi) and activation (CRISPRa) with minimal off-target effects [2527].

The functional CRISPR/Cas9 system for gene editing has been successfully developed in yeasts and some fungi [2840], including industrial filamentous fungi Aspergillus stains [33, 40], Trichoderma reesei [34] and Penicillium chrysogenum [36], and plant pathogenic fungi A. fumigatus [35, 38], Magnaporthe oryzae [37], and Ustilago maydis [39]. For instance, by using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology in T. reesei [34], simultaneous engineering of multiple genes was efficiently achieved through co-transformation with in vitro synthesized gRNAs and donor DNA even using short 200-bp homology arms, providing an applicable and promising approach to other lignocellulose degrading filamentous fungi. In A. fumigatus [35], the MMEJ-CRISPR system consisted of Cas9, and in vivo synthesized sgRNA under control of the A. fumigatus U6 snRNA promoter was sufficient to introduce 95–100% precise integration via even very short 35-bp homologous arms, indicating that this system can function as a powerful and versatile genome-engineering tool for genetic investigation in clinical Aspergillus isolates. Remarkably, it recently has been reported that the Di-CRISPR platform can efficiently integrate 18 copies of a combined xylose utilization and (R,R)-2,3-butanediol (BDO) production pathway (24 kb) in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a single step and generate a strain capable of producing BDO directly from xylose [31], envisioning that CRISPR technologies possess great potential of industrial application in metabolic engineering.

The development and application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system has not yet been reported in thermophilic fungi however. In this study, a CRISPR/Cas9 system was developed and successfully applied for genome engineering of up to four different gene loci simultaneously in the thermophilic fungus of industrial interest M. thermophila. Using this system, multiple strains with significantly increased lignocellulase production were generated. Successful targeted gene deletion was also demonstrated in M. heterothallica [4143], suggesting that the system developed here could be used in other thermophilic fungi. This new tool should accelerate the engineering of thermophilic fungi for industrial biotechnological production of enzymes and chemicals.


Expression of constitutive Cas9 in Myceliophthora thermophila

To develop an efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system (Fig. 1) for thermophilic fungi, an expression plasmid containing the Ptef1-Cas9-TtprC cassette and a bar selection marker was constructed. This expression vector was introduced into the WT strain of M. thermophila ATCC 42464. To check Cas9 expression and localization, a second plasmid with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) gene fused to Cas9 was then constructed and transformed into the strain ATCC 42464. The positive transformants from each construct were selected and named Cas9OE and Cas9-gfp accordingly. Microscopic analysis clearly demonstrated that Cas9 correctly localized to the nucleus of M. thermophila (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the CRISPR/Cas9 two-plasmid system in this study

Fig. 2

Phenotypic analysis of constitutive Cas9-expressing strains. a Fluorescence microscopic assessment of Cas9-gfp localization in M. thermophila. The nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Each scale bar represents 10 µm. b Colony growth and sporulation of Cas9OE and wild-type (WT) strains on minimal medium plates after 4 days of culture

To determine whether the constitutive expression of Cas9 nuclease alone had an effect on the growth of M. thermophila, the growth, secreted protein production, lignocellulosic enzyme activity, and mycelial dry weight of the Cas9OE strain were examined after three consecutive subcultures in parallel with those of the WT (ATCC 42464). As illustrated in Fig. 2b, the Cas9OE strain and the WT exhibited similar colony growth when grown on a sucrose carbon source. No significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p = 0.89) in secreted protein (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A, B) or lignocellulase activity (Additional file 1: Fig. S1C–E) was observed after 3 or 4 days of fermentation on 2% Avicel liquid medium. The Cas9OE strains showed an identical dry weight when grown on sucrose and Avicel (Additional file 1: Fig. S1F). Taken together, all of these results indicated that constitutive expression of Cas9 nuclease did not alter the growth, sporulation, or cellulolytic production of the ATCC 42464 strain of M. thermophila.

CRISPR/Cas9 system-directed gene mutagenesis without donor DNA in Myceliophthora thermophila

Because efficient expression of sgRNA requires a suitable promoter, a search for the native promoter of putative U6 snRNA genes in the genome of M. thermophila ATCC 42464 was conducted using bioinformatics tools. The putative RNA polymerase III U6 snRNA genes (U6) were located ( and a region approximately 500 bp upstream of the U6 gene was chosen as a trial promoter for expression of sgRNA (Fig. 1).

To investigate whether the constructed CRISPR/Cas9 system (Fig. 1) could perform gene editing in M. thermophila, a rapid testing system was designed based on amdS/fluoroacetamide (FAA) selection. This system was chosen because M. thermophila WT strains do not grow on acetamide as a nitrogen source and are resistant to certain FAAs. The transformants carrying the amdS gene were sensitive on FAA medium; thus, colonies harboring inactivated amdS could be isolated on FAA medium, thereby facilitating counter selection. Therefore, the amdS gene of A. nidulans was first artificially introduced into the M. thermophila WT genome through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [12]. The transformant carrying the functional amdS gene was named M1. An sgRNA sequence containing a 20-nucleotide target (Table 1) of the amdS gene was designed (U6p-amdS-sgRNA) to perform the amdS gene editing. The transient PCR product of U6p-amdS-sgRNA was co-transformed with a Cas9 expression cassette into protoplasts of the recipient strain M1 (containing the amdS gene and FAA-sensitive) (Fig. 3a). Seven FAA-resistant colonies were obtained and their amdS gene mutations were verified by sequencing. The seven mutants displayed frame-shift mutations upstream of the PAM site (Fig. 3b) involving either a single-nucleotide insertion/deletion or large insertions of 30, 65, or 104 nucleotides (the 104-nucleotide insertion mutant was named the M2 stain, and was used as a host strain for subsequent engineering). In a control experiment in which transformation was conducted using the Cas9 plasmid only, no colonies were observed on FAA-containing medium. Taken together, these data demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas9 system could mutate the target gene in the M. thermophila genome via NHEJ-mediated events during DSB repair.
Table 1

List of guide and protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences of each target locus used in this study

Target locus

Guide sequence

















Fig. 3

Introduction of directed mutations into the amdS gene in M. thermophila by sgRNA-guided Cas9. a Schematic illustration of amdS mutagenesis by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The M1 strain carrying the amdS gene was co-transformed with U6p-amdS-sgRNA and Cas9 cassettes, and then positive transformants were selected on medium plates containing 2 mg/mL FAA. b Sequence alignment of the amdS target locus from FAA-resistant transformants. The wild-type target sequence of amdS is framed in blue. Red letters depict the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)

CRISPR/Cas9 system-stimulated gene editing with donor DNA in Myceliophthora thermophila and M. heterothallica

CRISPR/Cas9 system-mediated HDR has been shown to work efficiently in many organisms, including several mesophilic fungi [3340]. To determine whether the CRISPR/Cas9 system could also operate via HDR on target gene loci in M. thermophila, a transient single-sgRNA PCR cassette was transformed into ATCC 42464 WT protoplasts together with a Cas9 expression cassette and a donor DNA PCR product composed of the G418-resistance cassette PtrpC-neo and 5′ and 3′ homologous arms.

As a proof of principle, the carbon catabolite repression (CCR) transcription factor cre-1 [44] was chosen as a target locus for editing (Fig. 4a). The protospacer sequence targeted to cre-1 is shown in Table 1. On the basis of genomic PCR analysis using specific primer sets (Fig. 4a), the selected marker cassettes were confirmed to be correctly inserted into the desired locus (ΔMtcre-1) in 19 out of 20 randomly picked transformants (Fig. 4b). The homologous recombination (HR) efficiencies for all tested transformants are summarized in Table 2. Compared with transformation with donor DNA alone (20%), the HR frequency of gene replacement was as high as 95% after co-transformation using the CRISPR-Cas9 system and HR donor DNA (Table 2; Fig. 4b; Additional file 2: Fig. S2). The HR rates were low (15%) when Cas9 or sgRNA alone was used for the transformation (Table 2; Additional file 2: Fig. S2).
Fig. 4

Verification of cre-1 deletion in selected transformants. a Schematic of homologous recombination (HR) of the target gene cre-1 mediated by Cas9, gRNA and donor DNA. (b-c) PCR analysis of selected transformants of M. thermophila b and M. heterothallica c with one primer (cre1-out-F) located upstream of the 5′ flanking region of the genomic DNA and the other (cre1-in-R) located in the 3′ flanking region of the genomic DNA. The expected length of disrupted transformants was 1.9 kb, while that of the host strain, used as a negative control, was 1.0 kb (rightmost lane)

Table 2

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination (HR) efficiency of simultaneous disruption of one to four gene loci

Host strain

Target locus

Elements in co-transformation

No. of analyzed transformants

No. of HR transformants

HR efficiency (%)

ATCC 42464






ATCC 42464


Cas9 + donor-cre1




ATCC 42464


cre1-sgRNA + donor-cre1




ATCC 42464


Cas9 + cre1-sgRNA + donor-cre1




CBS 203.75






CBS 203.75


Cas9 + donor-cre1




CBS 203.75


cre1-sgRNA + donor-cre1




CBS 203.75


Cas9 + cre1-sgRNA + donor-cre1




M2 strain

res-1, gh1-1

Two sets of sgRNA and donor DNA of res-1 and gh1-1




M2 strain

cre-1, gh1-1

Two sets of sgRNA and donor DNA of cre-1 and gh1-1




M2 strain

cre-1, res-1

Two sets of sgRNA and donor DNA of cre-1 and res-1




M2 strain

cre-1, res-1, gh1-1

Three sets of sgRNA and donor DNA of cre-1, res-1 and gh1-1




M2 strain

cre-1, res-1, gh1-1, alp-1

Four sets of sgRNA and donor DNA of cre-1, res-1, gh1-1 and alp-1




To evaluate the possibility of broader application of the above-described CRISPR/Cas9 system to other thermophilic fungi, it was used to perform genome editing in M. heterothallica, also with cre-1 as the target gene. The Cas9, U6p-cre1-sgRNA, and donor-cre1 constructs were co-transformed into M. heterothallica strain CBS203. Using both G418 and phosphinothricin selection, 20 transformants were chosen randomly and validated by PCR. As illustrated in Table 2, Fig. 4c, this system functioned well in CBS203.75, with the G418 marker cassette successfully integrated into the cre-1 locus of 18 transformants with 90% HR frequency. In the control experiments, only 15–20% disruption efficiencies were obtained when Cas9 or sgRNA was used for the transformation (Table 2; Additional file 2: Fig. S2).

Deletion of cre-1 led to increased cellulase production

Similar to the morphological alterations observed in cre1 deletion mutants of T. reesei, Neurospora crassa, and P. oxalicum [4449], the M. thermophila ΔMtcre-1 mutant exhibited slower, denser growth on sucrose than the WT ATCC 42464 (Fig. 5a). The effect of the cre-1 deletion on cellulase and hemicellulase production was also investigated. Compared with the WT strain, the ΔMtcre-1 mutant secreted 3.7-fold higher amounts of extracellular protein into the Avicel medium after 4 days of cultivation (Fig. 5b, c). Xylanase, endoglucanase, and exoglucanase activities in ΔMtcre-1 were all increased approximately threefold compared with the WT strain in 2% Avicel (Fig. 5d–f). Similar to the phenotype of ΔMtcre-1, the M. heterothallica ΔMhcre-1 mutant also formed smaller, denser colonies relative to the WT strain CBS203 (Fig. 5a). When grown on medium containing 2% Avicel as the sole carbon source, the ΔMhcre-1 mutant displayed a pronounced increase in secreted protein levels and lignocellulase activities (Fig. 5b–f) compared with the WT strain CBS203 (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.001).
Fig. 5

Phenotypic analysis of Δcre-1 and wild-type strains. a Colonies of Δcre-1Mtcre-1 and ΔMhcre-1) and wild-type strains (MtWT and MhWT) of M. thermophila and M. heterothallica on minimal medium plates after 2 days. b Sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of secreted protein of Δcre-1 and wild-type strains after 4 days culture in 2% Avicel medium. cf Assays for protein concentration and xylanase, endoglucanase, and exoglucanase activities of Δcre-1 and wild-type strains in 2% Avicel inducing medium after 3 and 4 days culture. Bars marked by asterisks in each group differ significantly from unmarked ones (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.001). Error bars represent SD from three replicates

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated simultaneous multiplex-locus genome editing in Myceliophthora thermophila

Because the CRISPR/Cas9 system functioned very efficiently for single-gene (e.g., cre-1 locus) editing in M. thermophila, multiple gene disruption through a single transformation was investigated. In addition to cre-1, two genes involved in cellulase production were chosen as targets: an endoplasmic reticulum stress regulator res-1 homolog [50] and the gh1-1 gene encoding β-glucosidase [10, 49, 5153]. M2, a strain with constitutive Cas9 expression and inactive amdS (through a large insertion of 104 nucleotides) that was derived from M1 (a strain carrying the amdS gene under the WT background, see Fig. 3), was used as the recipient strain in further experiments. First, three combinations of two-gene editing were performed (cre1 + res1, cre1 + gh1-1, and res1 + gh1-1; Table 2). The sgRNA and donor DNA of each of the two genes were co-transformed in a one-step transformation. A total of 23 transformants were randomly picked on selective plates containing G418 and phosphinothricin. All 23 randomly chosen transformants were then checked for both genes by diagnostic PCR. Using the CRISPR/Cas9 editing system, the efficiency of simultaneous disruption of the two genes was approximately 61–70% (Additional file 3: Fig. S3; Table 2). No obvious preference for a particular tested locus was observed in regard to disruption efficiency. A total of 10 Δcre1Δgh1-1, 11 Δcre1Δres1, and 11 Δgh1-1Δres1 homokaryotic double deletions were obtained (Additional file 3: Fig. S3).

Next, simultaneous deletion of all three loci (cre1, res1, and gh1-1) was conducted. Using the sgRNA and donor DNA sequences described above, all three sgRNA/donor DNA gene disruption sets were co-transformed together in the same molar amounts into the M2 strain. After 3 days of culture in selective medium, 23 transformants were randomly picked and subjected to PCR analysis. Seven transformants (homokaryon + heterokaryon) showed homologous recombination in the cre1, res1, and gh1-1 gene loci, and the efficiency of simultaneous triple recombination was about 30% (Additional file 4: Fig. S4; Table 2). Via one transformation, in particular, five of seven possible combinations of mutant genotypes were obtained, including the single-gene mutant Δcre-1, all three double-mutant genotypes (Δcre1Δgh1-1, Δcre1Δres1, and Δgh1-1Δres1) and the triple mutant Δcre1Δgh1-1Δres1, with only two single-gene mutants (Δres1 and Δgh1-1) missing (Additional file 4: Fig. S4).

Finally, simultaneous four gene disruption mediated by the CRISPR/Cas9 system was performed. In addition to cre1, res1, and gh1-1, the gene alp-1 [9], encoding alkaline protease, was chosen as the fourth deletion target. The experiment was performed as described above for three-gene deletion. Among 23 selected transformants, five clones (homokaryon + heterokaryon, 22%) were identified with all four genes disrupted, including three with homokaryotic quadruple deletions (ΔcΔgΔrΔa) (Additional file 5: Fig. S5). The copy number of the integrated neo marker in these transformants was determined by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Generally speaking, the copy number of the integrated marker was in good accordance with the number of target genes, which indicated that additional random integration of the marker did not happen often in this fungus (Additional file 6: Fig. S6).

Acquisition of multiple hyper-cellulase production strains through multiplex-locus genome engineering with the CRISPR/Cas9 technique in thermophilic fungi

As described above, four genes involved in the cellulase production pathway in M. thermophila were engineered using the CRISPR/Cas9 system and a total of 11 mutants (including single to quadruple gene deletion mutants) were obtained through multiple operations. Secreted protein levels and cellulolytic enzyme activities were measured in these 11 mutants (Figs. 6, 7). As shown in Fig. 6, all 11 mutants exhibited higher secreted protein production than the parental strain M2. Several of these mutants, including all obtained double, triple, and quadruple deletion mutants, produced secreted protein at levels threefold higher than that of the original strain. Of particular note, the secretome of the quadruple deletion mutant ΔcΔgΔrΔa was approximately fivefold larger than that of the parental strain.
Fig. 6

Secretome analysis of all disrupted mutants and the parental strain (M2). a Secreted protein production of all strains after 6 days cultivation in 2% Avicel inducing medium plus 0.5% peptone. b Sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of secreted protein in 6-day Avicel cultures. Bars marked by asterisks in each group differ significantly from unmarked ones (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.001). Error bars represent SD from three replicates

Fig. 7

Altered cellulolytic phenotypes of all disrupted mutants vs. the parental strain (M2). Assessments of FPA (a), xylanase (b), endoglucanase (c), and exoglucanase (d) activities of all strains in 2% Avicel inducing medium plus 0.5% peptone after 6 days culture. Bars marked by asterisks in each group differ significantly from unmarked ones (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.001). Error bars represent SD from three replicates

Consistent with this increased secreted protein production, lignocellulase activities in the mutants were markedly higher than in the original strain (Fig. 7). The filter paper activity (FPA, representing overall cellulase activity) and xylanase, endoglucanase, and exoglucanase activities in all mutants were significantly increased relative to the parental strain (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.001) (Fig. 7). It was exciting to observe that FPA, xylanase, endoglucanase, and exoglucanase activities in three strains, ΔcΔgΔr, ΔcΔgΔa, and ΔcΔgΔrΔa, were, respectively, 7.7- to 9.1-, 10.5- to 13.3-, 4.1- to 5.1-, and 5.3- to 5.8-fold higher than in the parental strain.


In this study, a CRISPR/Cas9 system was successfully developed that could disrupt single or multiple genes in M. thermophila and another Myceliophthora species, M. heterothallica. Previously, the U6 and other RNAP III promoters have commonly been used for expressing sgRNA during the development of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing tools in various organisms, including fungi such as A. fumigatus [35], P. chrysogenum [36], M. oryzae [37], and U. maydis [39]. However, these promoters are ill defined in some filamentous fungi such as T. reesei, in which the sgRNA was synthesized in vitro [34]. To minimize the number of transformation steps necessary to target M. thermophila genes, the U6 promoter of M. thermophila was identified here and used to drive the expression of sgRNAs in genome editing. Compared with classical gene deletion approaches such as A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation [12] and gene knockdown method by using the RNA interference [44], genome engineering in M. thermophila using the CRISPR/Cas9 strategy is much faster and easier. For example, the disruption efficiency of a single gene (cre-1) was as high as 90% using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Fig. 4), whereas the deletion frequency was only ~20% using the classical gene deletion method for the same gene (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). There has been great progress in the development of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing tools in cellulolytic fungi; using in vitro synthesized sgRNA, double (HR frequency: 16−45%) and triple (4.2%) gene disruption was achieved through one transformation using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in T. reesei [34]. Compared with the in vitro synthesized sgRNA in the T. reesei system, the recombination efficiency was higher in M. thermophila using the CRISPR/Cas9 system developed in this study (~60, ~30, and ~20% for double, triple, and quadruple deletion), in which the sgRNA was transcribed in vivo by the U6 promoter from itself (Table 2).

In cellulolytic fungi, lignocellulolytic enzyme production is regulated at both the transcriptional [54] and post-translational levels [50]. Genetically engineering the regulatory network at both levels represents an efficient and promising strategy for improving cellulase production in filamentous fungi. For instance, mis-expression of the transcription factors cre1 [4549] and res1 [50], and the major protease gene alp-1 [9] has resulted in significantly improved lignocellulolytic enzyme production. In the present study, the four genes (cre1, res1, gh1-1, and alp-1) involved in the cellulase production pathway in M. thermophila were simultaneously engineered by a one-step transformation, using the CRISPR/Cas9 system developed here. Compared with classical deletion methods, which generally yield a single mutant genotype per transformation, this time-saving CRISPR/Cas9 system can generate multiple mutant genotypes with different combinations of disrupted genes and thus provides additional opportunities to obtain desired mutant strains of industrial interest. For example, in present study, for the three-gene deletion assay (cre1, gh1-1, res1), besides the triple mutant (Δcre1Δalp1Δres1), a total 5 of 7 possible mutant genotypes from single to triple mutants were obtained. Only two single-gene mutants (Δres1 and Δgh1-1) were missing, which might have been because only a limited number of transformants (23 for each transformation) were picked; all the gene deletion combinations could potentially be obtained by screening more transformants. Thus, this method paves the way to get more desirable mutants by straightforward screening of colonies from a single transformation.

The deletion of cre1 in M. thermophila and M. heterothallica led to obvious increases in the cellulase secretome and activities, which suggested that the mechanism of cellulase repression mediated by cre-1 is conserved in the thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora and the mesophilic fungi N. crassa, T. reesei, and P. oxalicum [4449]. As expected, the triple and quadruple deletion strains ΔcΔgΔr, ΔcΔgΔa, and ΔcΔgΔrΔa displayed approximately fivefold higher cellulase production and 5.1–13.3-fold higher cellulolytic enzyme activities than the parent strains. The cellulase production levels by the strains developed here from one transformation are comparable to those of strains engineered by time-consuming methods in the well-known cellulase production species T. reesei [55] and P. oxalicum [53], suggesting that strain engineering for cellulase production in M. thermophila could be improved significantly within a short time through the CRISPR/Cas9 system developed here. Additionally, this CRISPR/Cas9 system can be used without modification in other Myceliophthora species such as M. heterothallica [4143], indicating it could be potentially used in many thermophilic fungi. This broad applicability provides an opportunity for deep investigation of these fungi, some of which possess interesting features such as a sexual cycle, both for basic research and for possible novel host development for future industrial biotechnological use.


In this study, an efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing was successfully developed in the thermophilic species M. thermophila and M. heterothallica. Using this system, up to four genes involved in the cellulase production pathway were simultaneously deleted in a one-step transformation. A strain with more than fivefold higher lignocellulase production was obtained after a single engineering cycle. The CRISPR/Cas9 system developed in this study should accelerate genome-wide metabolic engineering of thermophilic fungal Myceliophthora species for the production of lignocellulases and bio-based fuels and chemicals.


Strains and growth conditions

For vector propagation, Escherichia coli DH5α (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China) was cultured at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani broth plus kanamycin or ampicillin (100 µg mL−1). Agrobacterium tumefaciens AGL-1 used for fungal transformation was cultured at 28 °C in Luria–Bertani medium plus kanamycin (100 µg mL−1). Myceliophthora thermophila strain ATCC 42464 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, and M. heterothallica strain CBS 203.75 was obtained from the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures. The M. thermophila and M. heterothallica strains were cultured on Vogel’s MM supplemented with 2% sucrose at 45 °C for 10 days to obtain conidia. For flask culture, 10-day-old conidia of M. thermophila strains were inoculated in 100 mL of liquid medium (with a final concentration of 1 × 106 conidia mL−1) containing 1× Vogel’s salt with 2% (w/v) Avicel with or without 0.5% (w/v) peptone at 45 °C with shaking at 150 rpm.

Construction of Cas9 and sgRNA expression plasmids

All primer sequences used in this study are listed in Additional file 7: Table S1. All PCR products were amplified using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). A codon-optimized Cas9 gene with attached hac-1 (MYCTH_2310995) nuclear localization signals (NLS-Cas9-NLS) was synthesized by Life Technologies (Invitrogen) for expression in M. thermophila and M. heterothallica. The synthetic NLS-Cas9-NLS, the strong constitutive tef1 (MYCTH_2298136) promoter of M. thermophila, and the TtprC terminator were amplified using paired primers (Additional file 7: Table S1). With the aid of a NEB Gibson assembly kit, these amplification products were assembled to form a Ptef1-Cas9-TtprC cassette (Additional file 8) and inserted into a p0380-bar plasmid [56] carrying the bar marker to generate the Cas9-expression vector p0380-bar-Ptef1-Cas9-TtprC. A Gibson assembly kit was also used to construct a Cas9-eGFP-expression vector (p0380-bar-Ptef1-Cas9-eGFP-TtprC) in which enhanced GFP (eGFP) was fused to Cas9 as a reporter gene (Additional file 8). To generate sgRNA expression plasmids, an sgRNA scaffold was synthesized by Life Technologies. To express sgRNA in protoplasts, the M. thermophila U6 promoter was amplified from ATCC 42464 genomic DNA using the primer pair U6-F/R (Additional file 7: Table S1) and then fused to the sgRNA scaffold fragment by fusion PCR using U6-F and gRNA-R (Additional file 7: Table S1). The resulting fusion fragment was cloned into a pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector to create the corresponding plasmid U6p-sgRNA (Additional file 9).

To select for specific sgRNAs targeting amdS (GenBank number: M16371.1), cre-1 (MYCTH_2310085), res-1 (MYCTH_2302052), gh1-1 (MYCTH_115968), and alp-1 (MYCTH_2303011), all sgRNA target sites in the genome of M. thermophila were identified using the sgRNACas9 tool [57]. sgRNA target sites with high scores were chosen and the corresponding oligos were ordered (Additional file 7: Table S1). All protospacer sequences used to target the five different genes are presented in Table 1. A target-directed M. thermophila U6 promoter-driven sgRNA was created by overlapping PCR with the primers given in Additional file 7: Table S1 and cloned into a pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector, which yielded the corresponding plasmids U6p-amdS-sgRNA, U6p-cre1-sgRNA, U6p-res1-sgRNA, U6p-gh1-1-sgRNA, and U6p-alp1-sgRNA (Additional file 9).

Donor DNA construction

For construction of gene deletion substrates, the PtrpC-neo cassette was amplified from a p0380-neo plasmid [12]. The 5′ and 3′ flanking fragments of cre-1, res-1, gh1-1, and alp1 were separately amplified from M. thermophila genomic DNA via PCR with paired primers (Additional file 7: Table S1). The amplified 5′, 3′ and PtrpC-neo fragments were assembled and ligated into a pJET1.2/blunt cloning vector using a NEB Gibson assembly kit to generate four donor DNA sequences: donor-cre1, donor-res1, donor-gh1-1, and donor-alp1 (Additional file 10).

Expression of Cas9 in Myceliophthora thermophila

Two Cas9 expression vectors, p0380-bar-Ptef1-Cas9-TtprC and p0380-bar-Ptef1-Cas9-eGFP-TtprC, were transformed into WT M. thermophila strain ATCC 42464 via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [12]. Colonies grown for 4 days on MM at 35 °C were screened for bar gene resistance using 100 µg mL−1 phosphinothricin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), followed by sequential identification via PCR analysis. The positive transformants from each construct were named Cas9OE and Cas9-gfp. Cas9OE-positive transformants selected as replicates were subjected to three consecutive rounds of sub-culture; their phenotypes, including secreted protein production, mycelial dry weights and lignocellulosic enzyme activities, were examined in parallel with the WT strain.

Subcellular localization of Cas9-gfp in Myceliophthora thermophila

To localize GFP fusion proteins by microscopy, Cas9-gfp-positive transformants were inoculated in liquid MM containing 2% sucrose as the carbon source and grown for 24 h at 45 °C. Before imaging, hyphae were harvested and incubated with 1 mg mL−1 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole for 15 min. The microscopic observation was performed using an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscopy system, with the ImageJ software used for image processing.

Transformation of Myceliophthora thermophila and M. heterothallica protoplasts

Transformation of M. thermophila and M. heterothallica protoplasts was performed according to a previously described procedure [44]. For amdS mutagenesis, the promoter Ptef1 (MYCTH_2298136) and the full-length acetamidase-encoding gene amdS (GenBank number: M16371.1) were amplified from genomic DNA of M. thermophila and the plasmid p3SR2 using the paired primers Ptef1-F2/R2 and amdS-F/R, respectively. The amdS gene was fused with Ptef1 by overlapping PCR using the primer pair Ptef1-F2/amdS-R. The Ptef1-amdS cassette was then ligated into the EcoRI and HindIII sites of a pCAMBIA-0380 plasmid [56], thereby generating the expression plasmid p0380-Ptef1-amdS. This constructed plasmid was transformed into the WT strain via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Colonies grown for 5 days at 35 °C were selected in medium containing 10 mM acetamide as the sole nitrogen source. Positive transformants were identified by PCR with paired primers (Additional file 7: Table S1). From these transformants, the amdS expression strain M1 was chosen and used for further CRISPR/Cas9 manipulation. Briefly, 10 µg of the Cas9-expression PCR cassette bar-Ptef1-Cas9-TtprC and the gRNA expression PCR product U6p-amdS-sgRNA at a molar concentration ratio of 1:1 was co-transformed into protoplasts of the recipient strain M1. After transformation, amdS mutants were inoculated onto MM agar plates supplemented with 2 mg mL−1 FAA and 100 µg mL−1 phosphinothricin. After 3 days incubation at 35 °C, FAA-resistant mutants were isolated and tested for growth on acetamide medium, followed by identification and sequencing via PCR with paired primers (Additional file 7: Table S1).

For single-gene editing, 10 µg of the Cas9-expression PCR cassette bar-Ptef1-Cas9-TtprC, gRNA expression PCR cassette U6p-cre1-sgRNA, and donor-cre1 was mixed at a molar concentration ratio of 1:1:1 and added to the fungal protoplasts. Control experiments were performed by adding 10 µg of donor-cre1 alone, or only the Cas9 cassette and donor-cre1, or only U6p-cre1-sgRNA and donor-cre1 to the fungal protoplasts. Transformants were screened for bar resistance with phosphinothricin (100 µg mL−1) and neo resistance with G418 (40 µg mL−1), followed by PCR identification with paired primers (Additional file 7: Table S1).

For multiple genomic edits, the generated amdS mutant M2 containing a Cas9 expression chassis was used as a host. Multiple genomic modification involving the cre-1, res-1, gh1-1, and alp-1 loci was performed in M2 protoplasts through co-transformation of two, three, or four sets of sgRNA expression cassettes and donor DNA fragments at the same molar concentration. The putative transformants were selected on MM supplemented with 100 µg mL−1 phosphinothricin and 40 µg mL−1 G418, followed by sequential identification via PCR with paired primers (Additional file 7: Table S1).

Determining copy numbers by RT-qPCR

To determine the copy numbers of the integrated PtrpC-neo marker gene in the transformants, the fungal genomic DNAs were extracted as described previously [58] and used as templates for RT-qPCR. The RT-qPCR method was essentially the same as that described by Abad et al. [59]. The qPCR was performed with SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) in a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The primers used for the genes are listed in Additional file 7: Table S1. The actin gene (MYCTH_2314852) was used as an internal control. Each 20 μL reaction contained 1 μL of diluted DNA as the template, 10 μL of 2× SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix, 1 μL of each primer (0.4 M), and 7 μL of H2O. An equal volume of water instead of DNA was used as a negative control. The qPCR was performed as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. A melt curve analysis was performed at the end of each run from 55 to 95 °C with a ramp speed of 0.5 °C to ensure specific sequence amplification of all primers and only one melting temperature on the melting curve. To determine the amplification efficiencies between 90 and 110% of all reactions, the genomic DNA and plasmid DNA samples were diluted serially to construct standard curves and then subjected three times to RT-qPCR.

Protein and enzyme activity measurements

Total extracellular protein contents in the culture supernatants were measured using a Bio-Rad DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad) based on absorbance at 595 nm, with bovine serum albumin used as the standard. For protein gel electrophoresis, 30-µL aliquots of concentrated culture supernatants were subjected to sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on Novex NuPAGE pre-cast protein gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Endoglucanase activity in the culture supernatants was determined using an azo-cm-cellulose assay kit (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Endo-1,4-β-xylanase activities were assayed with an azo-xylan kit (Megazyme) following the method specified by the manufacturer. FPA activities were assayed with Whatman No.1 filter paper as the substrate. The enzyme reactions were performed in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.8) at 50 °C for 60 min, using the DNS method to quantify the released reducing sugar. Exoglucanase activity was assayed according to the method described by Zou et al. [60] and measured at 50 °C using 1.0 mg mL−1 p-nitrophenyl-β-D-cellobioside (Sigma-Aldrich) as the substrate in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.8) containing 1 mg mL−1 d-glucono-1,5-σ-lactone. Each reaction mixture containing 250 µL of properly diluted enzyme and 250 µL of 1.0 mg mL−1 substrate in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.8) was incubated for 10 min at 50 °C, and the reaction was terminated by adding 500 µL of 1 M Na2CO3. Released p-nitrophenol (pNP) was measured at an absorbance of 420 nm. Inactive enzyme, which was boiled at 100 °C for 10 min, was used as a control. pNP was used for the standard curve. In the exoglucanase activity analyses, one unit (U) of enzymatic activity was defined as the amount of 1 μmol glucose or pNP released by 1 mL of enzyme from the substrate per minute under the standard assay conditions. All estimates were performed in three repeated assays. The statistical significance of differences among WT and mutant strains was assessed by one-way analysis of variance.



clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats


homologous recombination


single chimeric guide RNA


protospacer adjacent motif


double-strand break


nonhomologous end joining


homology-directed repair


enhanced green fluorescence protein




carbon catabolite repression


wild type


filter paper activity


real-time quantitative PCR


Authors’ contributions

QL and CT designed the project; QL, RG, and JL carried out the experiments; QL, RG, JL, LL, JZ, and WS analyzed the data; QL and CT wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.: 31471186, 31640049) and the Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDRW-ZS-2016-3).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of supporting data

All the supporting data are available.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.: 31471186, 31640049) and the Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDRW-ZS-2016-3).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Systems Microbial Biotechnology, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences


  1. Carroll A, Somerville C. Cellulosic biofuels. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:165–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science. 2007;315:804–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mäkelä MR, Donofrio N, de Vries RP. Plant biomass degradation by fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;72:2–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat KM, Maheshwari R. Sporotrichum thermophile growth, cellulose degradation, and cellulase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:2175–82.Google Scholar
  5. Karnaouri A, Topakas E, Antonopoulou I, Christakopoulos P. Genomic insights into the fungal lignocellulolytic system of Myceliophthora thermophila. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:281.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Maheshwari R, Bharadwaj G, Bhat MK. Thermophilic fungi: their physiology and enzymes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:461–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Singh B. Myceliophthora thermophila syn. Sporotrichum thermophile: a thermophilic mould of biotechnological potential. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:59–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Viikari L, Alapuranen M, Puranen T, Vehmaanperä J, Siika-Aho M. Thermostable enzymes in lignocellulose hydrolysis. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;108:121–45.Google Scholar
  9. Visser H, Joosten V, Punt PJ, Gusakov AV, Olson PT, Joosten R, Bartels J, Visser J, Sinitsyn AP, Emalfarb MA. Development of a mature fungal technology and production platform for industrial enzymes based on a Myceliophthora thermophila isolate, previously known as Chrysosporium lucknowense C1. Ind Biotechnol. 2011;7:10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Berka RM, Grigoriev IV, Otillar R, Salamov A, Grimwood J, Reid I, Ishmael N, John T, Darmond C, Moisan MC, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the thermophilic biomass-degrading fungi Myceliophthora thermophila and Thielavia terrestris. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:922–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolbusz MA, Di Falco M, Ishmael N, Marqueteau S, Moisan MC, Baptista Cda S, Powlowski J, Tsang A. Transcriptome and exoproteome analysis of utilization of plant-derived biomass by Myceliophthora thermophila. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;72:10–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Xu J, Li JG, Lin LC, Liu Q, Sun WL, Huang BQ, Tian CG. Development of genetic tools for Myceliophthora thermophila. BMC Biotechnol. 2015;15:35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Weld RJ, Plummer KM, Carpenter MA, Ridgway HJ. Approaches to functional genomics in filamentous fungi. Cell Res. 2006;16:31–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;157:1262–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, Jaenisch R. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. 2013;153:910–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin SL, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu XB, Jiang WY, Marraffini LA, Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li JF, Norville JE, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J, Church GM, Sheen J. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:688–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhou YX, Zhu SY, Cai CZ, Yuan PF, Li CM, Huang YY, Wei WS. High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells. Nature. 2014;509:487–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hwang WY, Fu YF, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ, Sander JD, Peterson RT, Yeh JRJ, Joung JK. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:227–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Li W, Teng F, Li TD, Zhou Q. Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:684–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Shan QW, Wang YP, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen KL, Liang Z, Zhang K, Liu JX, Xi JJ, Qiu JL, Gao CX. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:686–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:1258096.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Shalem O, Sanjana NE, Hartenian E, Shi X, Scott DA, Mikkelsen TS, Heckl D, Ebert BL, Root DE, Doench JG, Zhang F. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science. 2014;343:84–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Doudna JA, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, Lim WA. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell. 2013;152:1173–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilbert LA, Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu ZR, Brar GA, Torres SE, Stern-Ginossar N, Brandman O, Whitehead EH, Doudna JA, et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in Eukaryotes. Cell. 2013;154:442–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilbert LA, Horlbeck MA, Adamson B, Villalta JE, Chen Y, Whitehead EH, Guimaraes C, Panning B, Ploegh HL, Bassik MC, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-mediated control of gene repression and activation. Cell. 2014;159:647–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4336–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Bao ZH, Xiao H, Lang J, Zhang L, Xiong X, Sun N, Si T, Zhao HM. Homology-Integrated CRISPR-Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:585–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jakočiūnas T, Sonde I, Herrgard M, Harrison SJ, Kristensen M, Pedersen LE, Jensen MK, Keasling JD. Multiplex metabolic pathway engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2015;28:213–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Shi SB, Liang YY, Zhang MZM, Ang EL, Zhao HM. A highly efficient single-step, markerless strategy for multi-copy chromosomal integration of large biochemical pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2016;33:19–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Vyas VK, Barrasa MI, Fink GR. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Science Advances. 2015;1:e1500248.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Nødvig CS, Nielsen JB, Kogle ME, Mortensen UH. A CRISPR-Cas9 system for genetic engineering of filamentous fungi. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133085.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu R, Chen L, Jiang YP, Zhou ZH, Zou G. Efficient genome editing in filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Discovery. 2015;1:15007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang C, Meng X, Wei X, Lu L. Highly efficient CRISPR mutagenesis by microhomology-mediated end joining in Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;86:47–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Pohl C, Kiel JA, Driessen AJ, Bovenberg RA, Nygård Y. CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing of Penicillium chrysogenum. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5:754–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Arazoe T, Miyoshi K, Yamato T, Ogawa T, Ohsato S, Arie T, Kuwata S. Tailor-made CRISPR/Cas system for highly efficient targeted gene replacement in the rice blast fungus. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:2543–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Fuller KK, Chen S, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Development of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted gene disruption in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell. 2015;14:1073–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Schuster M, Schweizer G, Reissmann S, Kahmann R. Genome editing in Ustilago maydis using the CRISPR-Cas system. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;89:3–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Katayama T, Tanaka Y, Okabe T, Nakamura H, Fujii W, Kitamoto K, Maruyama J. Development of a genome editing technique using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the industrial filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:637–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. van den Brink J, van Muiswinkel GCJ, Theelen B, Hinz SWA, de Vries RP. Efficient plant biomass degradation by thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora heterothallica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:1316–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. van den Brink J, Samson RA, Hagen F, Boekhout T, de Vries RP. Phylogeny of the industrial relevant, thermophilic genera Myceliophthora and Corynascus. Fungal Divers. 2012;52:197–207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Hutchinson MI, Powell AJ, Tsang A, O’Toole N, Berka RM, Barry K, Grigoriev IV, Natvig DO. Genetics of mating in members of the Chaetomiaceae as revealed by experimental and genomic characterization of reproduction in Myceliophthora heterothallica. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;86:9–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang F, Gong Y, Liu G, Zhao S, Wang J. Enhancing cellulase production in thermophilic fungus Myceliophthora thermophila ATCC42464 by RNA interference of cre1 gene expression. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;25:1101–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun J, Glass NL. Identification of the CRE-1 cellulolytic regulon in Neurospora crassa. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e25654.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Nakari-Setälä T, Paloheimo M, Kallio J, Vehmaanperä J, Penttilä M, Saloheimo M. Genetic modification of carbon catabolite repression in Trichoderma reesei for improved protein production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:4853–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruijter GJ, Vanhanen SA, Gielkens MM, van de Vondervoort PJ, Visser J. Isolation of Aspergillus niger creA mutants and effects of the mutations on expression of arabinases and l-arabinose catabolic enzymes. Microbiology. 1997;143:2991–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Kubicek CP, Mikus M, Schuster A, Schmoll M, Seiboth B. Metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of cellulase production by Hypocrea jecorina. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009;2:19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Yao GS, Li ZH, Gao LW, Wu RM, Kan QB, Liu GD, Qu YB. Redesigning the regulatory pathway to enhance cellulase production in Penicillium oxalicum. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Fan F, Ma G, Li J, Liu Q, Benz JP, Tian C, Ma Y. Genome-wide analysis of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response during lignocellulase production in Neurospora crassa. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Chen M, Qin YQ, Cao Q, Liu GD, Li J, Li ZH, Zhao J, Qu YB. Promotion of extracellular lignocellulolytic enzymes production by restraining the intracellular beta-glucosidase in Penicillium decumbens. Bioresource Technol. 2013;137:33–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Znameroski EA, Coradetti ST, Roche CM, Tsai JC, Iavarone AT, Cate JH, Glass NL. Induction of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in Neurospora crassa by cellodextrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6012–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Li ZH, Yao GS, Wu RM, Gao LW, Kan QB, Liu M, Yang P, Liu GD, Qin YQ, Song X, et al. Synergistic and dose-controlled regulation of cellulase gene expression in Penicillium oxalicum. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(9):e1005509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Coradetti ST, Craig JP, Xiong Y, Shock T, Tian C, Glass NL. Conserved and essential transcription factors for cellulase gene expression in ascomycete fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:7397–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Qian Y, Zhong L, Hou Y, Qu Y, Zhong Y. Characterization and strain improvement of a hypercellulytic variant, Trichoderma reesei SN1, by genetic engineering for optimized cellulase production in biomass conversion improvement. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1349.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu Q, Li JG, Ying SH, Wang JJ, Sun WL, Tian CG, Feng MG. Unveiling equal importance of two 14-3-3 proteins for morphogenesis, conidiation, stress tolerance and virulence of an insect pathogen. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:1444–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Xie SS, Shen B, Zhang CB, Huang XX, Zhang YL. sgRNAcas9: a Software package for designing CRISPR sgRNA and evaluating potential off-target cleavage sites. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Raeder U, Broda P. Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1985;1:17–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Abad S, Kitz K, Hörmann A, Schreiner U, Hartner FS, Glieder A. Real-time PCR-based determination of gene copy numbers in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol J. 2010;5:413–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Zou G, Shi SH, Jiang YP, van den Brink J, de Vries RP, Chen L, Zhang J, Ma L, Wang CS, Zhou ZH. Construction of a cellulase hyper-expression system in Trichoderma reesei by promoter and enzyme engineering. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017