Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Enhancing oil production and harvest by combining the marine alga Nannochloropsis oceanica and the oleaginous fungus Mortierella elongata

Biotechnology for Biofuels201811:174

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1172-2

©  The Author(s) 2018

  • Received: 16 March 2018
  • Accepted: 12 June 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Although microalgal biofuels have potential advantages over conventional fossil fuels, high production costs limit their application in the market. We developed bio-flocculation and incubation methods for the marine alga, Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779, and the oleaginous fungus, Mortierella elongata AG77, resulting in increased oil productivity.

Results

By growing separately and then combining the cells, the M. elongata mycelium could efficiently capture N. oceanica due to an intricate cellular interaction between the two species leading to bio-flocculation. Use of a high-salt culture medium induced accumulation of triacylglycerol (TAG) and enhanced the contents of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) including arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid in M. elongata. To increase TAG productivity in the alga, we developed an effective, reduced nitrogen-supply regime based on ammonium in environmental photobioreactors. Under optimized conditions, N. oceanica produced high levels of TAG that could be indirectly monitored by following chlorophyll content. Combining N. oceanica and M. elongata to initiate bio-flocculation yielded high levels of TAG and total fatty acids, with ~ 15 and 22% of total dry weight (DW), respectively, as well as high levels of PUFAs. Genetic engineering of N. oceanica for higher TAG content in nutrient-replete medium was accomplished by overexpressing DGTT5, a gene encoding the type II acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase 5. Combined with bio-flocculation, this approach led to increased production of TAG under nutrient-replete conditions (~ 10% of DW) compared to the wild type (~ 6% of DW).

Conclusions

The combined use of M. elongata and N. oceanica with available genomes and genetic engineering tools for both species opens up new avenues to improve biofuel productivity and allows for the engineering of polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Keywords

  • Nannochloropsis
  • Mortierella
  • Bio-flocculation
  • Polyunsaturated fatty acid
  • Triacylglycerol
  • Photobioreactor
  • Microalgae
  • Filamentous fungi
  • Cell–wall interaction
  • Biofuel
  • Nitrogen starvation

Background

Plant and algal oils are among the most energy-dense naturally occurring compounds that can be used as feedstocks for biofuel products. Microalgae have been considered as promising sustainable feedstock for supplanting fossil fuels since the 1970s. Advantages of microalgae over other biofuel feedstocks include high oil yield, short generation times, low agricultural land requirements, reduced fresh water needs, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions during algal cultivation [1–3]. To improve lipid productivity of microalgae, many studies have been conducted in model microalgae such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [4, 5], and biotechnologically relevant species such as Nannochloropsis [6–9]. Nannochloropsis species have become a focus for lipid and biofuel research, because these marine microalgae grow fast in open ponds or photobioreactors, and can be grown in seawater with high yields of lipid—up to 60% of dry weight (DW) [10–12]. In addition, Nannochloropsis is enriched in high-value polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) such as omega-3 eicosapentenoic acid (EPA), and it has a small and compact haploid genome (~ 30 Mbp). In recent years, the genomes of many species and strains of Nannochloropsis including N. gaditana and N. oceanica have been sequenced [13–15], and genetic engineering methods have been developed for gene disruption, i.e. CRISPR–Cas9 [8, 16, 17], and to generate overproduction systems for triacylglycerols (TAGs) and other target molecules [18, 19].

In spite of these apparent advantages, the high cost of microalgal-based fuel production prevents its application in the market [20–22]. The major barriers for the cost-effective production of microalgal biofuels include (1) high cost for harvesting microalgae; (2) low oil content and suboptimal composition; (3) high cost of lipid extraction; and (4) impasses in sustainable nutrient supply. Among these barriers, harvesting microalgae is particularly challenging because of the small cell size (typically 2–20 μm) and low density (0.3–5 g L−1) of microalgae, which can account for up to 50% of the total cost of biofuel products [23–25]. Traditional harvesting methods include chemical flocculation using multivalent cations such as metal salts and cationic polymers to neutralize the negative charge on the surface of microalgal cell walls, filtration for relatively large algae (> 70 μm), sedimentation/floatation for species that either fall out of suspension or float without sufficient mixing, thermal drying, and centrifugation, which have high cost and energy consumption [24–26].

Recently, bio-flocculation of microalgae with living materials such as bacteria and fungi has gained interest because of their high efficiency and relatively low energy requirement [23, 27–29]. In addition, many bio-flocculants can be cultured with nutrients from industrial wastes [29, 30]. The gram-positive bacterium Solibacillus silvestris can efficiently flocculate N. oceanica DUT01 without the addition of chemical flocculants or high-energy inputs. The bacterial flocculant exhibits no growth effect on the algal cells, and it can be reused for lower cost in harvesting [31]. In addition, some bio-flocculants such as filamentous fungi Aspergillus fumigatus and Mucor circinelloides can accumulate 10–15% lipid per DW which can increase the total lipid yield [30]. However, these filamentous fungi are also human pathogens, making them unsuitable for use as bio-flocculants.

Here we screened oleaginous fungi with regard to their ability to flocculate N. oceanica CCMP1779, a marine alga with a sequenced genome, rapidly growing molecular engineering tool kit, and the ability to produce high levels of TAG [9, 13, 18]. We discovered that N. oceanica could be efficiently flocculated by M. elongata AG77, a soil fungus that accumulates high levels of TAG and arachidonic acid (ARA), and for which a sequenced genome is available [32]. We provide detailed insights into the physical interaction between N. oceanica and M. elongata AG77 and test approaches for increasing the TAG content in N. oceanica by optimizing growth conditions and genetic engineering approaches in combination with bio-flocculation to harvest algal cells.

Results

N. oceanica cells are captured by the M. elongata mycelium

Fungi were incubated in potato dextrose broth (PDB). Fungal mycelium (~ 3 times of algal biomass) was added to the N. oceanica culture containing log-phase cells in f/2 medium in shaker flasks. After 6-day co-cultivation with M. elongata, N. oceanica cells aggregated in dense green clumps along the mycelium of the fungus (Fig. 1a). The interaction of N. oceanica with filamentous fungi appeared specific to M. elongata, as it was not observed in co-culture with Morchella americana 3668S (Fig. 1). Differential interference contrast (DIC) light microscopy showed dense numbers of N. oceanica cells attached to the M. elongata mycelium (Fig. 1c); in comparison, mycelium of M. americana hardly captured any algal cells (Fig. 1d). Three Mortierella strains, M. elongata AG77, M. elongata NVP64, and M. gamsii GBAus22 were used to test the flocculation efficiency for harvesting of N. oceanica with M. americana as a negative control. All three Mortierella isolates aggregated ~ 10% of algal cells after 2-h of co-culture and up to ~ 15% after 12 h (Fig. 1e). After 6-day co-cultivation, M. elongata AG77 and NVP64 captured ~ 60% of algal cells M. gamsii GBAus 22 captured ~ 25%. The short period of co-cultivation with fungi did not appear to affect the morphology of the algal cells and did not significantly change their diameter (Fig. 1f).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Harvesting Nannochloropsis oceanica by bio-flocculation with Mortierella fungi. a, b Co-culture of N. oceanica (Noc) with M. elongata AG77 (a), or Morchella americana 3668S (b). Fungal mycelium collected from PDB medium was added to a log-phase Noc culture grown in flasks and both were incubated for 6 days in flasks containing f/2 medium. The red arrow indicates green aggregates formed by AG77 mycelium and attached Noc cells. c Noc cells attached to AG77 mycelium as shown by differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. d No obvious attachment of Noc cells on the 3668S mycelium. e Bio-flocculation efficiency for harvesting Noc cells by cocultivation with Mortierella elongata AG77, M. elongata NVP64, and M. gamsii GBAus22 in f/2 medium. The bio-flocculation efficiency was determined by the cell density of uncaptured cells compared to that of a no-fungus Noc culture control. Morchella 3668S culture was used as a negative control. The results are the average of five biological replicates and error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences relative to the 2-h co-cultures by paired-sample Student’s t-test (*P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01). f Measurement of Noc cell size (diameter) in the Noc culture and alga-fungus co-culture

Physical interaction between the cell walls of N. oceanica and Mortierella fungi

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to investigate the physical interaction between N. oceanica and M. elongata strains AG77 (Fig. 2a) and NVP64 (Fig. 2b). Low-magnification images (Fig. 2, top panels) showed an aggregation of algal cells around the fungal mycelium as seen in the light micrographs (Fig. 1c). Higher-magnification images displayed details of the physical interaction between the alga and fungus (Fig. 2, middle and bottom panels). Similar to the cell–wall structure of N. gaditana [33], N. oceanica has extensions on the outer layer of the cell wall, which are attached to the rugged surface of the fungal hyphae; irregular tube-like structures are formed between the algal and fungal cell walls, which very likely contribute to anchoring the algal cells to the mycelium. The M. americana strain 3668S, which has much thicker hyphae (10–20 μm in diameter) than the M. elongata strains AG77 and NVP64 (< 2 μm), showed no obvious capture of N. oceanica cells (Fig. 2c) or flocculation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Interaction between N. oceanica and Mortierella mycelium co-cultivated in f/2 medium. Fungal mycelium was added to a log-phase Noc culture grown in a flask and then the mixture was incubated for 6 days in f/2 medium. Scanning electron microscopy was performed to investigate the interaction between N. oceanica (Noc) cells and M. elongata AG77 (a) and NVP64 (b). Noc cells are attached to the fungal mycelium as shown in the top panel. Higher magnification micrographs show that Noc cells have a highly structured cell wall with protrusions, with which they attach to the rough surface of the fungal cell wall. The red arrowheads indicate tube-like structures that connect the algal and fungal cell walls. c Morchella americana 3668S mycelium collected from a Noc-3668S culture after 6-day co-cultivation

Flocculation of N. oceanica with Mortierella fungi increases the yield of TAG and PUFAs

Mortierella fungi are known to produce high amounts of TAG and PUFAs including ARA [34, 35]. Indeed, numerous lipid droplets were observed in both Mortierella and Morchella fungi tested for algae flocculation (Fig. 3a–d). In contrast, N. oceanica had fewer and smaller lipid droplets when grown in nutrient-sufficient f/2 medium with or without fungi (Fig. 3e–i) in shaker flasks. Lipids were extracted and separated by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), and fatty acid methyl esters were quantified by gas chromatography and flame ionization detection (GC–FID) to determine the lipid and fatty acid composition. As shown in Table 1, M. elongata AG77 and M. gamsii GBAus22 had much higher contents of TAG, ARA, total PUFAs and total fatty acids, but less content of EPA compared to N. oceanica, which affects the final yield of these compounds in the alga-fungus aggregate. N. oceanica TAG is mainly composed of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids such as C16:0 and C16:1 (Fig. 4a), whereas Mortierella fungi have more PUFAs, especially ARA (Fig. 4b). N. oceanica has more EPA in total lipid than in TAG (Fig. 4a), and the alga-fungus aggregate contains ~ 10% ARA and ~ 7% EPA of total lipid (Fig. 4c).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Mortierella fungi have more oil droplets than N. oceanica in f/2 medium. a–d Confocal micrographs showing lipid droplets in the fungal mycelium grown in flasks containing PDB medium. Green fluorescence indicates lipid droplets stained with BODIPY. e Lipid droplets in log-phase N. oceanica (Noc) cells grown in flasks containing f/2 medium. Red, autofluorescence of Noc chloroplast. f–i Lipid droplets in the algal and fungal cells after 6-day co-cultivation in f/2 medium. Fungal mycelium was added to the log-phase Noc culture for 6-day co-culture in flasks. AG77, M. elongata AG77; NVP64, M. elongata NVP64; GBAus22, M. gamsii GBAus22; 3668S, Morchella americana 3668S

Table 1

Lipid contents of different strains grown in f/2 medium in shaker flasks (mg g−1 total dry weight)

Strains

Total fatty acid

TAG

ARA

EPA

Total PUFAs

N. oceanica

118.7 ± 18.4

15.1 ± 2.3

3.1 ± 0.5

17.0 ± 2.6

21.5 ± 3.3

M. elongata AG77

238.8 ± 14.5

94.6 ± 4.5

42.4 ± 2.3

4.3 ± 0.5

89.1 ± 4.8

M. gamsii GBAus 22

178.0 ± 23.9

54.9 ± 3.9

29.3 ± 2.1

1.7 ± 0.5

66.1 ± 2.2

M. elongata AG77 and N. oceanica

168.5 ± 8.9

62.1 ± 3.0

16.3 ± 1.1

12.0 ± 0.9

46.5 ± 3.7

M. gamsii GBAus22 and N. oceanica

163.3 ± 10.5

42.0 ± 9.5

17.5 ± 1.7

9.0 ± 1.4

36.1 ± 6.1

M. elongata AG77/M. gamsii GBAus22 and N. oceanica, co-cultivation of the alga and fungi in f/2 medium for 6 days in shaker flasks. Results are the average of three biological replicates with standard deviations

TAG triacylglycerol, ARA arachidonic acid (20:4), EPA eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5), PUFAs polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g. 18:2, 18:3, 20:4 and 20:5)

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Fatty acid profiling of triacylglycerol (TAG) and total lipid in Mortierella fungi, N. oceanica, and algae–fungi aggregates after 6-day co-cultivation. a Fatty acid assays of triacylglycerol and total lipid in log-phase N. oceanica grown in shaker flask containing f/2 medium. Fatty acids are indicated with number of carbons: number of double bonds. Results are the average of five biological replicates with error bars indicating standard deviations (n = 5). b Fatty acid assays of M. elongata AG77 incubated in f/2 medium. Fungal mycelium was collected from PDB medium and then washed and added to f/2 medium and incubated for 6 days. n = 5. c Fatty acids of the algae–fungi aggregates after 6-day co-cultivation in flasks containing f/2 medium. n = 5

Compared to regular PDB fungal growth medium, f/2 medium has a high salt concentration and an elevated pH (= 7.6) and lacks sugar [36]. Thus, M. elongata AG77 and M. gamsii GBAus22 were incubated in different media in shaker flasks to test the impact on lipid metabolism of high pH (PDB medium, pH7.6), high pH and high salinity (f/2 + 1% sugar), and high pH and high salinity with sugar starvation (f/2 medium). These adverse conditions generally increased the TAG and total lipid content of M. elongata AG77 and M. gamsii GBAus22, especially under high salinity condition (PDB pH7.6 compared to f/2 + 1% sugar) (Additional file 1: Table S1). Compared to M. gamsii GBAus22, M. elongata AG77 showed a significant increase in TAG and total lipid under high pH (PDB, from pH 5.3 to 7.6), and a lower increase in total lipid, and slight decrease in TAG, upon sugar starvation (f/2 + 1% sugar compared to f/2) (Additional file 1: Table S1). These adverse conditions reduced the contents of ARA and total PUFAs in M. gamsii GBAus22, while EPA increased upon high pH but decreased under high salinity and sugar starvation (Additional file 1: Table S1). In contrast, M. elongata AG77 had increased contents of ARA and PUFAs in response to sugar starvation but these fatty acids decreased under high pH and high salinity conditions; EPA of M. elongata AG77 was decreased under all stress conditions compared to regular growth condition (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Increasing TAG content in N. oceanica cells using ammonium as the N source

It has been reported that TAG is the major compound for transitory carbon storage in N. oceanica cells grown under light/dark cycles [37]. However, the TAG content was relatively low when cells were grown under regular conditions [13, 38]. Indeed, N. oceanica cells produced fewer and smaller lipid droplets than the fungi during incubation in f/2 medium visible in confocal micrographs (Fig. 3). To increase TAG yield in N. oceanica, two approaches were employed: nutrient deprivation and genetic engineering. N deprivation is one of the most efficient ways to promote TAG synthesis in microalgae [2, 7, 39]. Following 120-h N deprivation in shaker flasks, TAG accumulated in N. oceanica accounted for up to ~ 70% of the total lipid fraction (Additional file 2: Figure S1A), which is over 20% of DW (Additional file 2: Figure S1B). The content of TAG quickly increased following N deprivation and decreased following N resupply, indicating that N. oceanica cells are very sensitive to the N supply (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Under laboratory conditions, N deprivation of algal cultures can be performed by centrifugation to pellet the algal cells, followed by washes and resuspension in N-depleted medium. However, this approach is not practical during scale up for industrial purposes.

Thus, we developed a limited N supply-culturing method for large-volume cultures to induce TAG accumulation largely without compromising growth and biomass yields. To mimic natural cultivation conditions for N. oceanica, such as an open-pond system, we used for these experiments environmental photobioreactors (ePBRs). We grew the algal cells under varying light conditions (0–2000 μmol photons m−2 s−1) under long-day (14/10 h light/dark) cycles (Additional file 3: Figure S2), and we sparged with 5% CO2 at 0.37 L min−1 for 2 min per h at 23 °C primarily to adjust the pH in the reactor vessel as previously described in [40]. Illumination in the ePBR is provided by a high-power white LED light on top of a conical culture vessel (total height of 27 cm) containing 330 mL of algal culture (20 cm in depth), which was designed to simulate pond depths from 5 to 25 cm [40]. We substituted several N sources in the f/2 medium for the incubation of N. oceanica containing set amounts of either ammonium, nitrate, or urea. Compared to nitrate and urea, N. oceanica grew faster in the f/2-NH4Cl medium (Additional file 4: Figure S3A), consistent with previous observations for Nannochloropsis sp. [41] and Nannochloropsis gaditana [42]. The DW of N. oceanica cells per L was also higher in the f/2-NH4Cl culture after 7-day incubation in the ePBR (Additional file 4: Figure S3B). Intriguingly, the cells grown in f/2-NH4Cl medium turned from vivid green to yellow following 7-day incubation once they reached stationary phase (Additional file 3: Figure S2A), indicative of chlorophyll degradation in the algal cells. Lipid analysis by TLC (Fig. 5a) and GC–FID (Fig. 5b) demonstrated TAG accumulation during the period of days from 2 to 8 after the culture reached stationary phase (incubation time S2 to S8), which was inversely correlated with chlorophyll content, while cell density and dry weight remained at similar levels during this period (Additional file 4: Figure S3C, D). Previously, to prevent carbon limitation, NaHCO3 was added to N. oceanica cultures in shaker flasks [43]. Here using the ePBRs, we noticed that the addition of NaHCO3 prevented acidification of the cultures, which were sparged with 5% CO2 (Additional file 5: Figure S4A). N. oceanica cells accumulated more TAG upon acidification in the culture medium without NaHCO3 supply, especially from S6 to S8, compared to the NaHCO3 culture (Additional file 5: Figure S4A, B).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Chlorophyll as proxy of triacylglycerol accumulation. a Analysis of triacylglycerol (TAG) by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Algal cells were incubated in environmental photobioreactor (ePBR) containing f/2-NH4Cl medium after inoculation to stationary phase and then prolonged incubation. Red arrowheads indicate the TAG bands. S1 to S8, day 1 to 8 after the cells reached stationary phase; control, TAG standard. b Inverse correlation of chlorophyll content and TAG-to-total-lipid ratio following prolonged incubation in the ePBR containing f/2-NH4Cl medium. TAG and total lipid were subjected to transesterification and the resulting fatty acid methyl esters were quantified by GC–FID. r2, correlation coefficient; n = 4

Increasing the yields of TAG and total fatty acid in alga-fungus aggregates

Nannochloropsis oceanica cells were inoculated to ~ 1 × 106 mL−1 in f/2-NH4Cl medium in the ePBR and then grown to stationary phase. The cultures were further incubated for 8 days to allow the algal cells accumulate high levels of TAG as described above. Following this prolonged incubation in the ePBR, N. oceanica cells had a high TAG content, as shown by direct quantification (Fig. 5b) and confocal microscopy (Fig. 6a). These high-oil algal cells were then transferred from the ePBR to flasks, and ~ 3 times biomass of fungal mycelium was added. This led to the formation of algal–fungal aggregates during 6 days of co-cultivation in flask cultures. We did not attempt to co-cultivate algae and fungi in the ePBRs to avoid fungal contamination of the ePBRs and aggregation disruption by the constant stir bar motion. Following prolonged incubation in the ePBR, N. oceanica cells showed a high TAG content, as determined by direct quantification (Fig. 5b) and confocal microscopy (Fig. 6a). Following a subsequent co-cultivation of algal and fungal cells for 6 days, the algal–fungal aggregates were then collected by mesh filtration for further microscopy and lipid analysis. Both alga and fungus contained a high number of lipid droplets (Fig. 6b), and were enriched in TAG (~ 15% of DW) and total fatty acid (~ 22% of DW) (Fig. 6c), which was much higher than that for f/2 medium-grown algal cells that produced 6.2% TAG and 16.9% total fatty acid of DW (Table 1) with fungal co-cultivation. The overall oil productivity was increased from ~ 0.25 g L−1 day−1 TAG and ~ 0.67 g L−1 day−1 total fatty acid, when the algae were grown in f/2 medium in shaker flasks followed by co-cultivation with fungal cells, to 0.59 g L−1 day−1 TAG and 0.86 g L−1 day−1 total fatty acid, when algae were grown in f/2-NH4Cl medium in the ePBR followed by co-cultivation with fungal cells. In addition, the oil from these algal–fungal aggregates contained ~ 10% ARA in TAG and total fatty acid (Fig. 6c).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Increasing triacylglycerol (TAG) content in N. oceanica using limited ammonium as N source. a N. oceanica (Noc) cells produce large lipid droplets during prolonged incubation in the environmental photobioreactor (ePBR) containing f/2-NH4Cl medium. Noc cells grow fast in f/2-NH4Cl medium and suffer from nutrient limitation after 8 days in the stationary phase, when the confocal micrographs were taken. Green fluorescence indicates lipid droplets stained with BODIPY, while red fluorescence represents autofluorescence of Noc chloroplasts. b Lipid droplet staining of M. elongata AG77 and Noc cells after 6 days co-cultivation in shaker flasks following the incubation of the algae in ePBRs. c Fatty acid (FA) analyses of triacylglycerol and total lipid in the alga-fungus aggregate as shown in (b). Biomass ratio of TAG or total FA relative to the total cell dry weight (DW). n = 5

Genetic engineering was also performed to increase TAG content in N. oceanica by overexpressing DGTT5 under the control of a strong elongation factor gene (EF) promoter (Additional file 6: Figure S5). Two strains (DGTT5ox3 and ox6) obtained from nuclear transformation displayed a strong increase in the DGTT5 expression compared to the wild-type and empty-vector control by quantitative RT-PCR (Additional file 7: Figure S6A). The construct generated DGTT5 fused to the cerulean fluorescent protein, and the presence of the cerulean protein in DGTT5ox3 and ox6 was confirmed by confocal microscopy (Additional file 7: Figure S6B). Subsequent BODIPY staining showed that the DGTT5oxs lines had more lipid droplets compared to the wild type under regular growth condition (Additional file 7: Figure S6C), which was further confirmed by quantitative lipid analysis (Additional file 7: Figure S6C). Because the elongation factor promotor was inhibited by N starvation, the DGTToxs cells were not incubated in f/2-NH4Cl medium but grown in regular f/2 medium, and then log-phase cells of DGTT5oxs were co-cultivated with ~ 3 times biomass of M. elongata AG77, and TAG yields of the algal–fungal aggregates were determined. The DGTT5oxs had increased TAG content (~ 10% of DW) compared to the wild type (~ 6% of DW) (Additional file 7: Figure S6E), which was less productive than the cells cultivated in a low N-medium (~ 15% of DW).

Fatty acid and TAG synthesis pathways in M. elongata AG77

The genome of N. oceanica CCMP1779 has been sequenced and analyzed for the presence of metabolic pathway genes for PUFA and TAG biosynthesis [13], information used in the genetic engineering for increased EPA content [18]. For Mortierella fungi, nuclear transformation methods were established [44, 45], and the M. elongata AG77 genome has been sequenced and annotated [32], but lipid metabolic pathways have not yet been reconstructed. Thus, we applied the genome browser and BLAST tools from the JGI fungal genome portal MycoCosm to predict fatty acid, PUFA, and TAG synthesis pathways for M. elongata AG77. The fatty acid synthesis pathway (Fig. 7a) was predicted according to gene candidates (Additional file 8: Table S2) and previous reports on eukaryotic fatty acid pathways [46, 47]. M. elongata AG77 has a type-I fatty acid synthase with a similar domain organization as found in yeast (Fig. 7b) [46]. Nine elongases and twelve desaturases were identified within the M. elongata AG77 genome for PUFA synthesis, including a ∆15 fatty acid desaturase (FAD) for EPA synthesis (Fig. 7c, Additional file 8: Table S2). Three DGATs and one PDAT (phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase) were present in the M. elongata AG77 genome, which is similar to what was reported for M. alpina [47].
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Predicted fatty acid/lipid pathways in M. elongata AG77. Proteins likely involved in the synthesis of fatty acids (FA), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), and triacylglycerol (TAG) are identified in the sequenced genome of M. elongata AG77 at the JGI fungal genome portal MycoCosm (Additional file 8: Table S2). a FA synthesis. ACP, acyl carrier protein; AT, acetyltransferase; MPT, malonyl/palmitoyl transferase; ACSL, acyl-CoA synthetase; KS, β-ketoacyl synthase; ER, β-enoyl reductase; DH, dehydratase; KR, β-ketoacyl reductase. b Linear domain organization of fatty acid synthase (FASN) of M. elongata AG77. PPT, phosphopantetheine transferase. c PUFA synthesis. ELOVL, fatty acid elongase; FAD, fatty acid desaturase. Fatty acids are designated by the number of total carbon: the number of double bonds. The position of specific double bonds is indicated either from the carboxyl end (∆) or from the methyl end (ω). d TAG synthesis. ALDH, aldehyde dehydrogenase; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; GK, glycerol kinase; GPDH, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPAT, glycero-3-phosphate acyltransferase; PlsC, 1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; LPIN, phosphatidate phosphatase LPIN; PAP, phosphatidate phosphatase 2; Dgk, diacylglycerol kinase; DGAT, diacylglycerol acyltransferase; PDAT, phospholipid diacylglycerol acyltransferase

Discussion

Microalgal biofuel is a renewable and sustainable energy source that can be a supplement or alternative to fossil fuels [1, 2, 26]. Although microalgal biofuel has many competitive advantages, current high costs associated with algal biofuel production limit its commercialization [20–22]. To overcome the major challenges in algal biofuel production, including high costs of harvesting, lipid extraction, and nutrient supply, as well as low oil content in algae, we developed a method to harvest the oleaginous marine alga N. oceanica through bio-flocculation with an oleaginous fungus M. elongata AG77. By optimizing the incubation conditions, we have increased TAG biofuel yields.

Bio-flocculation of N. oceanica by Mortierella fungi and physical interactions between the partners

Physical interaction and symbioses between fungi and algae naturally occur, such as in lichens, where autotrophic algae co-exist with fungi and develop a mutualistic relationship [48]. In fact, about one-fifth of all the known extant fungal species are symbiotically associated with photobionts such as algae and cyanobacteria in lichenized forms [49]. Taking advantage of known algal–fungal interactions, filamentous fungi have been tested for harvesting microalgae in recent years [23, 29]. However, although some of the tested fungal strains including Aspergillus nomius and A. fumigatus can very efficiently flocculate algae, they are not enriched in oil such that they dilute the algal oil in the resulting biomass [50, 51]. In addition, some fungal strains reported to flocculate algae such as A. fumigatus and M. circinelloides are animal pathogens and can threaten human health [28, 30].

In this study, we sought to use nonpathogenic oleaginous fungi to test their potential for bio-flocculation of microalgae. Among the screened fungi, M. elongata AG77 can be used to efficiently harvest N. oceanica cells (Fig. 1a). M. elongata AG77, which grows in soil and associates with plant roots [52], produces TAG and PUFAs including ARA and EPA (Table 1). N. oceanica cells were captured by the M. elongata AG77 mycelium. With the addition of ~ threefold algal biomass, M. elongata AG77 can flocculate ~ 65% of algal cells after 6-day co-cultivation in flask cultures and was the most efficient isolate tested (Fig. 1c, e). Other studies have shown high efficiency of algal flocculation by fungi [30, 50, 51]. However, the exact nature of the interaction between algae and fungi remains to be determined. Previous studies have suggested that the fungal cell wall has a positive charge that likely attracts and neutralizes the negatively charged algal cells [30, 50, 51], similar to chemical flocculation methods using metal salts and cationic polymers. Fungal cell walls contain chitin, which has a strong positive charge, and the algal flocculation efficiency was correlated with the chitin content (12–16% of DW) in the five fungal strains tested for harvesting Nannochloropsis sp. [50]. However, zeta potential measurements that represent the surface charges do not necessarily correlate with flocculation efficiency [30, 50], suggesting that the flocculation of algae by fungi is not only dependent on the ionic attraction. In this study, we investigated details of the physical interaction between N. oceanica and fungi with SEM. Micrographs show N. oceanica cells trapped within the mesh-like mycelium of M. elongata AG77 and NVP64 (Fig. 2a, b). High-magnification images (×20,000 to ×250,000) show that N. oceanica has extensions along the outer layer of the cell wall, which appear to attach algal cells to the rugged surface of the fungal cell wall. Similar extension structures have also been observed in N. gaditana cells, which are connected to a thin algaenan layer of the N. gaditana cell wall, based on quick-freeze deep-etch EM and analyses of cell wall compositions [33]. Intriguingly, some fiber-like extensions from the N. oceanica cell walls seem to fuse with the surface of the fungal cell wall and form irregular tube-like structures that appear to anchor the algal cells to the mycelium (Fig. 2a, b). However, the Morchella strain 3668S that cannot flocculate N. oceanica, is also not able to capture N. oceanica cells in its mycelium (Fig. 2c). Considering that both Mortierella and Morchella fungi have high chitin contents in their cell wall [53, 54], M. elongata AG77 and NVP64 and M. americana 3668S likely have positive surface charges. A major physical difference between the strains is that M. americana 3668S has much thicker hyphae than the M. elongata strains, suggesting that the size and structure of the mycelium may be important for the physical attraction of algal cells, but fungal exudates and chemotaxis could also underlie efficient bio-flocculation.

TAG and PUFAs are increased in Mortierella grown in f/2 medium

The oleaginous fungi tested in this study produce a large number of lipid droplets, when incubated in regular PDB medium in flaks cultures as shown by confocal microscopy (Fig. 3a–d). To flocculate N. oceanica cells, fungal mycelium was added into the algal culture that contains high concentration of sea salt at pH 7.6 but lacks a sugar supply. The combined stress conditions presented by f/2 medium elevated the TAG and PUFA contents in M. elongata AG77 (Additional file 1: Table S1) and decreased its growth, such that it would not outgrow the algal cells. In fact, N. oceanica cells had normal diameter (Fig. 1f) and low amount of oil when co-cultivated with the fungi (Fig. 3f–i), similar to the cells that were grown alone and those grown in f/2 medium (Fig. 3e).

Mortierella elongata AG77 is a representative strain of Mortierella, a widespread genus of soil fungi, which are industrially important for the production of ARA-rich oil [34, 35]. Mortierella fungi grow fast in nutrient-rich media, and studies have shown that M. elongata CBS 121.71 and M. alpina SD003 can also grow in wastewater [55, 56], while a related species Umbelopsis isabellina can grow on sewage sludge [57], suggesting low-cost incubation methods of growing M. elongata AG77 for the bio-flocculation of algae.

Increasing TAG in N. oceanica cells through genetic engineering and by optimizing incubation conditions

In recent years, intensive studies have been performed on Nannochloropsis because of its potential for biofuel production [7, 10–12]. Besides its high TAG content, Nannochloropsis is enriched in PUFAs such as EPA, a high-value omega-3 fatty acid [18]. However, Nannochloropsis species, such as N. oceanica, do not have high oil content under favorable growth conditions (Fig. 3e; Additional file 2: Figure S1) [13, 37]. Thus, although the N. oceanica–M. elongata AG77 co-culture generated favorable yields of ARA and EPA, TAG production was only ~ 6% of DW—lower than the ~ 10% TAG yield when using M. elongata AG77 alone (Table 1, Fig. 4). Nannochloropsis accumulates high levels of TAG and total fatty acids in response to stress conditions such as N deprivation (Additional file 2: Figure S1) and following the addition of the ribosome inhibitor cycloheximide [8]. Similarly, TAG and total lipid stimulation by environmental stresses have been commonly observed in the other microalgae such as green algae and diatoms [2, 7]. TAG is usually used as the feedstock for biodiesel and can be converted into high-energy fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) by transesterification with glycerol as a valuable byproduct [25, 58]. In addition, TAG is a nonpolar lipid stored in lipid droplets and is more readily extractable with organic solvent than the polar membrane lipids [59]. Thus, the increasing TAG content can simplify the lipid extraction and transesterification, thereby reducing the cost of processing. To increase TAG content in N. oceanica, we developed an N starvation method for N. oceanica using ammonium as the N source. We tested the growth of N. oceanica with three N sources—ammonium, nitrate, and urea—in ePBRs that can mimic natural growth conditions such as open-pond system (Additional file 3: Figure S2) [40]. N. oceanica cells grow significantly faster and have higher biomass in the ammonium medium than the nitrate and urea media, following the same period of incubation (Additional file 4: Figure S3). In addition, N. oceanica cells consumed ammonium faster than nitrate and approached N starvation during the week after the culture reached stationary phase (Fig. 5; Additional file 3: Figure S2A), consistent with the previous observation that Nannochloropsis sp. grow faster in ammonium medium with a significantly higher uptake rate of ammonium than nitrate [41]. N deprivation is one of the most efficient ways to stimulate TAG accumulation in microalgae. However, it is not feasible to centrifuge the cells and change the medium at large industrial scales, as one can do in the laboratory. Considering that N. oceanica cells are very sensitive to the N supply (Additional file 2: Figure S1), feeding ammonium to the culture with limited amount of N, or in multiple-low doses, can allow for rapid cell growth, and provide a means to control the abundance of N in the culture. The N supply can be stopped as the culture reaches the stationary phase such that the cells exhaust their N supply and enter N starvation, while the total cell count and biomass are not compromised (Additional file 4: Figure S3C, D).

We have developed a quick and simple method to indirectly monitor TAG content for N. oceanica using chlorophyll as an indicator. Chlorophyll content is inversely correlated with TAG content during nutrient deprivation (Fig. 5b). In fact, thylakoid membrane degradation, in parallel with TAG accumulation, has been commonly observed in microalgae and plant vegetative tissues. These combined processes can reduce photosynthesis and photooxidative stress, sequester toxic compounds such as free fatty acids, and save the acyl chains for later resynthesis of membranes when conditions improve [7, 39, 60].

We also noticed that culture acidification caused by CO2 supply led to faster and higher TAG accumulation in N. oceanica cells (Additional file 5: Figure S4). The described N starvation method should be applicable for most microalgal species, especially for the wild-type and transgenic strains optimized for growth rate, biomass, and stress resistance, but which have low oil content under regular growth condition. Under the right conditions, TAG accumulation occurs once the culture reaches stationary phase/high biomass. The N starvation method we describe will not reduce cell growth or biomass, which has been commonly observed for genetically engineered high TAG strains [8, 9, 19]. On the contrary, the higher the biomass and cell concentration, the faster the algal cells deplete their N source and generate more TAG. Taking advantage of the high TAG-yielding N. oceanica cells produced by the N starvation method (Fig. 6b), we obtained high yields of TAG (~ 15% of DW) and total fatty acids (~ 22% of DW) in the N. oceanica-AG77 aggregate (Fig. 6b, c).

Potential of genetic engineering of PUFAs in N. oceanica and M. elongata AG77

Both N. oceanica CCMP1779 and M. elongata AG77 generate ARA and EPA: ARA is low in N. oceanica but high in AG77, whereas EPA is high in N. oceanica but low in AG77 (Fig. 4a, b). Besides ARA and EPA, M. elongata AG77 also produces ~ 5% DHA (Fig. 4b). Thus, the complementary production of ARA, EPA, and DHA, high-value products with important health benefits [61], could increase the value of the oil produced by aggregates of N. oceanica and M. elongata AG77. In addition, the genome of N. oceanica CCMP1779 and its BLAST and gene browser tools are available [13], and genetic engineering methods such as CRISPR–Cas9 and overexpression systems have been established for N. oceanica [9, 16, 18]. Recent studies have successfully increased the EPA production by the overexpression of ∆5 and ∆12 FADs in N. oceanica [18] and induced TAG production under normal growth condition by overexpressing N. oceanica DGTT5 [9].

Transformation methods for Mortierella fungi such as M. alpina have been developed [45, 62], and the genome of M. elongata AG77 is available [32]. In this study, we analyzed the genome data and predicted the PUFA and TAG synthesis pathways (Fig. 7), based on the gene candidates involved in the processes (Additional file 8: Table S2), which will facilitate genetic engineering on PUFA and TAG products in M. elongata AG77 in the future.

Conclusions

Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779 and M. elongata AG77 are model species of algae and fungi, respectively. Both genera contain many other oleaginous strains (e.g., N. gaditana and M. alpina). The bio-flocculation method demonstrated in this study could be performed with other strains leading to synergistic increases in TAG content of the biomass. The N starvation and seawater medium can also be used on transgenic strains with high TAG or high biomass traits, which has the potential to increase oil yield and reduce the cost of oil extraction and transesterification. N. oceanica grows in seawater, and M. elongata AG77 can be incubated with wastewater and sewage that most likely can reduce the cost of nutrient supply. Overall, the combination of N. oceanica and M. elongata AG77 has the potential to overcome some of the barriers for the commercialization of microalgal/fungal biofuels and biomaterials.

Methods

Materials and growth condition

The marine alga Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779 was obtained from the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Culture of Marine Phytoplankton. N. oceanica DGTT5-overexpressing strains DGTT5ox3 and DGTT5ox6 were generated and examined by quantitative RT-PCR as previously described [9]. The alga was grown in f/2 medium containing 2.5 mM NaNO3, 0.036 mM NaH2PO4, 0.106 mM Na2SiO3, 0.012 mM FeCl3, 0.012 mM Na2EDTA, 0.039 μM CuSO4, 0.026 μM Na2MoO4, 0.077 μM ZnSO4, 0.042 μM CoCl2, 0.91 μM MnCl2, 0.3 μM thiamine HCl/vitamin B1, 2.05 nM biotin, 0.37 nM cyanocobalamin/vitamin B12 [63], and 20 mM sodium bicarbonate and 15 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.6) to prevent carbon limitation [43]. The cells were grown in batch cultures in two systems: shaker flask with f/2 medium (under ~ 80 μmole photons m−2 s−1 at 23 °C) or in ePBRs [40] with f/2-NH4Cl (2.5 mM NH4Cl replacing 2.5 mM NaNO3) or f/2-urea (2.5 mM urea replacing 2.5 mM NaNO3) medium with varying light conditions as indicated (Additional file 3: Figure S2, 0–2000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 under diurnal 14/10 h light/dark cycle) at 23 °C and sparged with air enriched to 5% CO2 at 0.37 L min−1 for 2 min per h. For prolonged-incubation in the ePBR, N. oceanica cells were inoculated to ~ 1 × 106 mL−1 in f/2-NH4Cl medium and grown to stationary phase. The cultures were further incubated for 8 days to increase TAG content.

Mortierella fungi M. elongata AG77, M. elongata NVP64, and M. gamsii GBAus22 isolates were isolated from soil samples collected in North Carolina (AG77), Michigan (NVP64), USA, and Australia (GBAus22). Morchella americana 3668S was obtained from the USDA NRRL Agriculture Research Station. Fungal samples were incubated in PDB medium (12 g L−1 potato dextrose broth and 1 g L−1 yeast extract, pH5.3) at 23 °C. For the algal–fungal co-cultivation, fungal mycelia were briefly blended into small pieces (~ 1 cm) with a sterilized blender and were collected by centrifugation (3000g for 3 min) after 24-h recovery in PDB medium. The samples were washed twice with f/2 or f/2—NH4Cl medium and resuspended in 5–10 mL of the respective medium. One-third of the samples were used for determining dry biomass: 1 mL culture was transferred and filtered with pre-dried and -weighed Whatman GF/C filters and dried overnight at 80 °C. The remaining fungal mycelia were added to the N. oceanica culture (~ 3 times to algal biomass) for 6-day co-cultivation on a shaker (~ 60 rpm) under continuous light (~ 80 μmol photons m−2 s−1) at 23 °C. Cell size and concentration of N. oceanica cultures were determined with a Z2 Coulter Counter (Beckman). The bio-flocculation efficiency of N. oceanica cells using fungal mycelium was determined by the cell density of uncaptured algal cells compared to that of an algal culture control, to which no fungus was added.

Light microscopy

Interactions between the algal and fungal cells were examined by light microscopy using an inverted microscope with DIC function (DMi8, Leica). DIC images were taken of the algae–fungi aggregates after 6-day co-cultivation.

Scanning electron microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy was performed to investigate the physical interaction between N. oceanica and fungi at the Center for Advanced Microscopy of Michigan State University (CAM, MSU). Algae–fungi aggregates were collected after 6-day co-culture of the alga N. oceanica with M. elongata (AG77 and NVP64) or M. americana 3668S and were fixed in 4% (v/v) glutaraldehyde solution, followed by drying in a critical point dryer (Model 010, Balzers Union). The samples were then mounted on aluminum stubs with high vacuum carbon tabs (SPI Supplies), and were coated with osmium using a NEOC-AT osmium coater (Meiwafosis). The samples were observed with a JSM-7500F scanning electron microscope (Japan Electron Optics Laboratories).

Confocal microscopy

Confocal microscopy was carried out to visualize and briefly quantify lipid droplets in the alga and the fungi. The samples were stained with 10 μg mL−1 BODIPY 493/503 (ThermoFisher Scientific) in PBS buffer for ~ 30 min at 23 °C. After two washes with PBS buffer, the samples were observed using an Olympus Spectral FV1000 microscope at CAM, MSU. An argon (488 nm) laser and a solid-state laser (556 nm) were used for BODIPY (emission, 510–530 nm) and chloroplast (emission, 655–755 nm) fluorescence. N. oceanica DGTT5 fused to the cerulean fluorescent protein was overproduced using the EF promotor as previously published [9]. The presence of the fluorescent protein in the DGTT5ox strains was detected by confocal microscopy (emission 420–440 nm) using a LSM 510 Meta Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (Zeiss).

Lipid extraction and analysis

For lipid extraction, log-phase N. oceanica cells grown in f/2 medium were collected by centrifugation (4000g for 5 min). To test lipid content in different media, Mortierella fungi grown in PDB medium were washed twice with different media: PDB medium, pH7.6; f/2 medium with 1% glucose; f/2 medium. The cells were incubated in the respective medium for 48 h and were subsequently collected for lipid extraction by centrifugation (3000g for 3 min). For total lipid extraction, algae–fungi aggregates were collected by mesh filtration and frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to grinding with mortar and pestle. The fine powders were transferred to a pre-weighed and -frozen glass tube, and total lipids were extracted with methanol-chloroform-88% formic acid (1:2:0.1 by volume) on a multi-tube vortexer (1500g for ~ 20 min; Benchmark Scientific), followed by addition of 0.5 volume of 1 M KCl and 0.2 M H3PO4. After phase separation by centrifugation (2000g for 3 min), total lipids were collected for TAG separation and fatty acid analysis. The solids were dried at 80 °C overnight to provide the nonlipid biomass.

TAG was separated by TLC using G60 silica gel TLC plates (Machery-Nagel) developed with petroleum ether-diethyl ether-acetic acid (80:20:1 by volume). An internal standard of 5 μg of tridecanoic acid (C13:0) or pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) was added to each tube containing TAG or total lipid. FAMEs were then prepared with 1 M methanolic HCl at 80 °C for 25 min, and were phase separated with hexane and 0.9% NaCl and nitrogen-dried and resuspended in ~ 50 μL of hexane. Gas chromatography and flame ionization detection (Agilent) were used to quantify the FAMEs in TAG and total lipid as previously described [64]. Dry weight of algae–fungi biomass was obtained by summing up nonlipid and total lipid mass.

Chlorophyll measurement

Nannochloropsis oceanica cells were collected by centrifugation from 1 mL culture aliquots during prolonged incubation in the ePBRs. Chlorophyll of the pelleted cells was extracted with 900 μL of acetone:DMSO (3:2, v/v) for 20 min with agitation at 23 °C, and measured with an Uvikon 930 spectrophotometer (Kontron) [60].

Generation of N. oceanica DGTT5 overexpression strains

The NoDGTT5 sequence was amplified by PCR using the primers: forward, 5′-ATGACGCCGCAAGCCGACATCACCAGCAAGACGA-3′; reverse, 5′-CTCAATGGACAACGGGCGCGTCTCCCACTCC-3′, followed by gel purification with E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction Kit (OMEGA Biotek) and ligated into the pnoc ox cerulean hyg vector (Additional file 6: Figure S5A) to obtain the final vector pnoc ox DGTT5 cerulean hyg (Additional file 6: Figure S5B) for nuclear transformation. N. oceanica CCMP1779 cells were transformed by electroporation as previously described [13].

Prediction of fatty acid and TAG pathways

The sequenced genome of M. elongata AG77 [32] was annotated for genes and proteins likely involved in the synthesis of fatty acids, PUFAs, and TAGs using by BLAST searches against KOG and KEGG databases at the JGI fungal genome portal MycoCosm M. elongata AG77 v2.0 and by comparison to previously published annotations of lipid pathways of Mortierella alpina [47].

Accession numbers

Sequence data presented in this article can be found in the genome of N. oceanica CCMP1779 at the JGI database (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Nanoce1779/Nanoce1779.home.html). Gene ID of N. oceanica DGTT5, CCMP1779_3915; Accession Number, KY273672. Sequence data of M. elongata AG77 can be found at the JGI fungal genome portal MycoCosm (https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Morel2/Morel2.home.html). Transcript IDs and protein IDs of the genes are listed in the Additional file 8: Table S2.

Abbreviations

ARA: 

arachidonic acid

DGTT5 : 

a gene encoding the type II acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase 5

DHA: 

docosahexaenoic acid

DW: 

dry weight

EF : 

elongation factor gene

EPA: 

eicosapentenoic acid

ePBR: 

environmental photobioreactor

FAMEs: 

fatty acid methyl esters

GC–FID: 

gas chromatography and flame ionization detection

PDAT: 

phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase

PDB: 

potato dextrose broth

PUFAs: 

polyunsaturated fatty acids

S2 to S8: 

days 2 to 8 after the culture reached stationary phase

SEM: 

scanning electron microscopy

TAG: 

triacylglycerol

TLC: 

thin layer chromatography

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ZD, GB, and CB designed the experiments. ZD performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the article; JA contributed to the initial tests of bio-flocculation; BH contributed to growth and lipid experiments using ePBRs; KZ generated the DGTT5 strains; NB contributed to the lipid analysis and biomass determination; AZ contributed to the data analysis of lipid-related genes and proteins and prediction of lipid pathways. ZD, GB, and CB coordinated the writing and edited the drafts of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ben Lucker and David Kramer (MSU) for providing the ePBRs; Melinda Frame and Carol Flegler (CAM, MSU) for the assistance with confocal and scanning electron microscopy; Eric Poliner (MSU) for providing the pnox ox Cerulean hyg vector; and Natalie Vande Pol (MSU) and Kerry O’Donnell (NRRL) for M. americana 3668S.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. All materials are available from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All authors consented to the publication of this work.

Funding

Z.D. and C.B. were supported by a grant from the Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FG02-91ER20021). A.Z. was supported by the Department of Energy Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE Office of Science BER DE-FC02-07ER64494). In addtion, this work was supported in part by DOE Office of Science BER DE-SC0018409 grant to G.B. G.B. also acknowledges the National Science Foundation DEB 1737898 for financial support. G.B. and C.B. acknowledge the support received from AgBioResearch. K.Z. received funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/under REA grant agreement No. [627266] supporting K.Z. The EU is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. J.A. and B.H were participants in the Plant Genomics @ MSU Research Experience for Undergraduates Program funded by NSF DBI-1358474.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Energy-Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
(2)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
(3)
Department of Plant Biochemistry, Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute for Plant Sciences, Georg-August-University, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
(4)
Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
(5)
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
(6)
Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

References

  1. Georgianna DR, Mayfield SP. Exploiting diversity and synthetic biology for the production of algal biofuels. Nature. 2012;488(7411):329–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, Jarvis E, Ghirardi M, Posewitz M, Seibert M, Darzins A. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. Plant J. 2008;54(4):621–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Miranda AF, Taha M, Wrede D, Morrison P, Ball AS, Stevenson T, Mouradov A. Lipid production in association of filamentous fungi with genetically modified cyanobacterial cells. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:179.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Li-Beisson Y, Beisson F, Riekhof W. Metabolism of acyl-lipids in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 2015;82(3):504–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Merchant SS, Kropat J, Liu B, Shaw J, Warakanont J. TAG, you’re it! Chlamydomonas as a reference organism for understanding algal triacylglycerol accumulation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23(3):352–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ma XN, Chen TP, Yang B, Liu J, Chen F. Lipid production from Nannochloropsis. Mar Drugs. 2016;14(4):61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Du ZY, Benning C. Triacylglycerol accumulation in photosynthetic cells in plants and algae. Subcell Biochem. 2016;86:179–205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ajjawi I, Verruto J, Aqui M, Soriaga LB, Coppersmith J, Kwok K, Peach L, Orchard E, Kalb R, Xu W, et al. Lipid production in Nannochloropsis gaditana is doubled by decreasing expression of a single transcriptional regulator. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(7):647–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zienkiewicz K, Zienkiewicz A, Poliner E, Du ZY, Vollheyde K, Herrfurth C, Marmon S, Farre EM, Feussner I, Benning C. Nannochloropsis, a rich source of diacylglycerol acyltransferases for engineering of triacylglycerol content in different hosts. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma Y, Wang Z, Yu C, Yin Y, Zhou G. Evaluation of the potential of 9 Nannochloropsis strains for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol. 2014;167:503–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodolfi L, Chini Zittelli G, Bassi N, Padovani G, Biondi N, Bonini G, Tredici MR. Microalgae for oil: strain selection, induction of lipid synthesis and outdoor mass cultivation in a low-cost photobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;102(1):100–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu JY, Song YM, Qiu W. Oleaginous microalgae Nannochloropsis as a new model for biofuel production: review and analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;72:154–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Vieler A, Wu G, Tsai CH, Bullard B, Cornish AJ, Harvey C, Reca IB, Thornburg C, Achawanantakun R, Buehl CJ, et al. Genome, functional gene annotation, and nuclear transformation of the heterokont oleaginous alga Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(11):e1003064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Fuerstenberg SI, Tae H, Settlage RE, Boore JL, Posewitz MC. Draft genome sequence and genetic transformation of the oleaginous alga Nannochloropis gaditana. Nat Commun. 2012;3:686.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang D, Ning K, Li J, Hu J, Han D, Wang H, Zeng X, Jing X, Zhou Q, Su X, et al. Nannochloropsis genomes reveal evolution of microalgal oleaginous traits. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(1):e1004094.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang Q, Lu Y, Xin Y, Wei L, Huang S, Xu J. Genome editing of model oleaginous microalgae Nannochloropsis spp. by CRISPR/Cas9. Plant J. 2016;88(6):1071–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Poliner E, Takeuchi T, Du ZY, Benning C, Farre E. Non-transgenic marker-free gene disruption by an episomal CRISPR system in the oleaginous microalga, Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7(4):962–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Poliner E, Pulman JA, Zienkiewicz K, Childs K, Benning C, Farre EM. A toolkit for Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779 enables gene stacking and genetic engineering of the eicosapentaenoic acid pathway for enhanced long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(1):298–309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Xin Y, Lu Y, Lee YY, Wei L, Jia J, Wang Q, Wang D, Bai F, Hu H, Hu Q, et al. Producing designer oils in industrial microalgae by rational modulation of co-evolving type-2 diacylglycerol acyltransferases. Mol Plant. 2017;10(12):1523–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gao Y, Gregor C, Liang Y, Tang D, Tweed C. Algae biodiesel—a feasibility report. Chem Cent J. 2012;6(Suppl 1):S1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerber LN, Tester JW, Beal CM, Huntley ME, Sills DL. Target cultivation and financing parameters for sustainable production of fuel and feed from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(7):3333–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang GH, Chen F, Wei D, Zhang XW, Chen G. Biodiesel production by microalgal biotechnology. Appl Energy. 2010;87:38–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gultom SO, Hu B. Review of microalgae harvesting via Co-pelletization with filamentous fungus. Energies. 2013;6:5921–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Leite GB, Abdelaziz AE, Hallenbeck PC. Algal biofuels: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 2013;145:134–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Aguirre AM, Bassi A, Saxena P. Engineering challenges in biodiesel production from microalgae. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013;33(3):293–308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rocca S, Agostini A, Giuntoli J, Marelli L. Biofuels from algae: technology options, energy balance and GHG emissions. JRC. 2015. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC98760/algae_biofuels_report_21122015.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2018.
  27. Miranda AF, Ramkumar N, Andriotis C, Holtkemeier T, Yasmin A, Rochfort S, Wlodkowic D, Morrison P, Roddick F, Spangenberg G, et al. Applications of microalgal biofilms for wastewater treatment and bioenergy production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajendran A, Hu B. Mycoalgae biofilm: development of a novel platform technology using algae and fungal cultures. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Padmaperuma G, Kapoore RV, Gilmour DJ, Vaidyanathan S. Microbial consortia: a critical look at microalgae co-cultures for enhanced biomanufacturing. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2017.1390728.Google Scholar
  30. Muradov N, Taha M, Miranda AF, Wrede D, Kadali K, Gujar A, Stevenson T, Ball AS, Mouradov A. Fungal-assisted algal flocculation: application in wastewater treatment and biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wan C, Zhao XQ, Guo SL, Asraful Alam M, Bai FW. Bioflocculant production from Solibacillus silvestris W01 and its application in cost-effective harvest of marine microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica by flocculation. Bioresour Technol. 2013;135:207–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Uehling J, Gryganskyi A, Hameed K, Tschaplinski T, Misztal PK, Wu S, Desiro A, Vande Pol N, Du Z, Zienkiewicz A, et al. Comparative genomics of Mortierella elongata and its bacterial endosymbiont Mycoavidus cysteinexigens. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19(8):2964–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Scholz MJ, Weiss TL, Jinkerson RE, Jing J, Roth R, Goodenough U, Posewitz MC, Gerken HG. Ultrastructure and composition of the Nannochloropsis gaditana cell wall. Eukaryot Cell. 2014;13(11):1450–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sakuradani E, Ando A, Ogawa J, Shimizu S. Improved production of various polyunsaturated fatty acids through filamentous fungus Mortierella alpina breeding. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84(1):1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ji XJ, Ren LJ, Nie ZK, Huang H, Ouyang PK. Fungal arachidonic acid-rich oil: research, development and industrialization. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;34(3):197–214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Guillard RRL, editor. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. New York: Plenum Press; 1975.Google Scholar
  37. Poliner E, Panchy N, Newton L, Wu G, Lapinsky A, Bullard B, Zienkiewicz A, Benning C, Shiu SH, Farre EM. Transcriptional coordination of physiological responses in Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779 under light/dark cycles. Plant J. 2015;83(6):1097–113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Jia J, Han DX, Gerken HG, Li YT, Sommerfeld M, Hu Q, Xu J. Molecular mechanisms for photosynthetic carbon partitioning into storage neutral lipids in Nannochloropsis oceanica under nitrogen-depletion conditions. Algal Res. 2015;7:66–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zienkiewicz K, Du ZY, Ma W, Vollheyde K, Benning C. Stress-induced neutral lipid biosynthesis in microalgae—molecular, cellular and physiological insights. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1861(9 Pt B):1269–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucker BF, Hall CC, Zegarac R, Kramer DM. The environmental photobioreactor (ePBR): an algal culturing platform for simulating dynamic natural environments. Algal Res. 2014;6:242–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hii YS, Soo CL, Chuah TS, Mohd-Azmi A, Abol-Munafi A. Interactive effect of ammonia and nitrate on the nitrogen uptake by Nannochloropsis sp. J Sustain Sci Manag. 2011;6:60–8.Google Scholar
  42. Ren M, Ogden K. Cultivation of Nannochloropsis gaditana on mixtures of nitrogen sources. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.11818.Google Scholar
  43. Vieler A, Brubaker SB, Vick B, Benning C. A lipid droplet protein of Nannochloropsis with functions partially analogous to plant oleosins. Plant Physiol. 2012;158(4):1562–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Takeno S, Sakuradani E, Tomi A, Inohara-Ochiai M, Kawashima H, Shimizu S. Transformation of oil-producing fungus, Mortierella alpina 1S-4, using Zeocin, and application to arachidonic acid production. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005;100(6):617–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ando A, Sakuradani E, Horinaka K, Ogawa J, Shimizu S. Transformation of an oleaginous zygomycete Mortierella alpina 1S-4 with the carboxin resistance gene conferred by mutation of the iron-sulfur subunit of succinate dehydrogenase. Curr Genet. 2009;55(3):349–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Leibundgut M, Maier T, Jenni S, Ban N. The multienzyme architecture of eukaryotic fatty acid synthases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18(6):714–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang L, Chen W, Feng Y, Ren Y, Gu Z, Chen H, Wang H, Thomas MJ, Zhang B, Berquin IM, et al. Genome characterization of the oleaginous fungus Mortierella alpina. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28319.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ahmadjian V, Jacobs JB. Relationship between fungus and alga in the lichen Cladonia cristatella Tuck. Nature. 1981;289:169–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Lutzoni F, Pagel M, Reeb V. Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature. 2001;411(6840):937–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Talukder MMR, Das P, Wu JC. Immobilization of microalgae on exogenous fungal mycelium: a promising separation method to harvest both marine and freshwater microalgae. Biochem Eng J. 2014;91:53–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Wrede D, Taha M, Miranda AF, Kadali K, Stevenson T, Ball AS, Mouradov A. Co-cultivation of fungal and microalgal cells as an efficient system for harvesting microalgal cells, lipid production and wastewater treatment. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e113497.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Bonito G, Hameed K, Ventura K, Krishnan R, Schadt JC, Vilgalys R. Isolating a functionally relevant guild of fungi from the root microbiome of Populus. Fungal Ecol. 2016;22:35–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Manocha MS. Cell surface characteristics of Mortierella species and their interaction with a rnycoparasite. Can J Microbiol. 1984;30:290–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Ruiz-Herrera J, Osorio E. Isolation and chemical analysis of the cell wall of Morchella sp. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1974;40(1):57–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Fernandes BS, Fernandes Messias MC, Carvalho PO, Zaiat M, da Cruz Pradella JG. Data of added-value lipid production, Arachidonic acid, among other lipids by Mortierella elongata, using low cost simulated wastewater. Data Brief. 2017;14:255–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Song X, Ma Z, Tan Y, Zhang H, Cui Q. Wastewater recycling technology for fermentation in polyunsaturated fatty acid production. Bioresour Technol. 2017;235:79–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu Z, Ruan Z, Xiao Y, Yi Y, Tang YJ, Liao W, Liu Y. Integration of sewage sludge digestion with advanced biofuel synthesis. Bioresour Technol. 2013;132:166–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Durrett TP, Benning C, Ohlrogge J. Plant triacylglycerols as feedstocks for the production of biofuels. Plant J. 2008;54(4):593–607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Ghasemi Naghdi F, Gonzalez Gonzalez LM, Chan W, Schenk PM. Progress on lipid extraction from wet algal biomass for biodiesel production. Microb Biotechnol. 2016;9(6):718–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Du ZY, Lucker BF, Zienkiewicz K, Miller TE, Zienkiewicz A, Sears BB, Kramer DM, Benning C. Galactoglycerolipid lipase PGD1 is involved in thylakoid membrane remodeling in response to adverse environmental conditions in Chlamydomonas. Plant Cell. 2018;30(2):447–65.Google Scholar
  61. Cuellar-Bermudez SP, Aguilar-Hernandez I, Cardenas-Chavez DL, Ornelas-Soto N, Romero-Ogawa MA, Parra-Saldivar R. Extraction and purification of high-value metabolites from microalgae: essential lipids, astaxanthin and phycobiliproteins. Microb Biotechnol. 2015;8(2):190–209.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Mackenzie DA, Wongwathanarat P, Carter AT, Archer DB. Isolation and use of a homologous histone H4 promoter and a ribosomal DNA region in a transformation vector for the oil-producing fungus Mortierella alpina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(11):4655–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Andersen RA, Berges JA, Harrison PJ. Watanabe MM Appendix A. Algal culturing techniques. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  64. Liu B, Vieler A, Li C, Jones AD, Benning C. Triacylglycerol profiling of microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Nannochloropsis oceanica. Bioresour Technol. 2013;146:310–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement

Biotechnology for Biofuels

ISSN: 1754-6834

Contact us