Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Adaptive laboratory evolution of cadmium tolerance in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

Biotechnology for Biofuels201811:205

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1205-x

  • Received: 9 March 2018
  • Accepted: 16 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Cadmium has been a significant threat to environment and human health due to its high toxicity and wide application in fossil-fuel burning and battery industry. Cyanobacteria are one of the most dominant prokaryotes, and the previous studies suggested that they could be valuable in removing Cd2+ from waste water. However, currently, the tolerance to cadmium is very low in cyanobacteria. To further engineer cyanobacteria for the environmental application, it is thus necessary to determine the mechanism that they respond to high concentration of cadmium.

Results

In this study, a robust strain of Synechocystis PCC 6803 (named ALE-9.0) tolerant to CdSO4 with a concentration up to 9.0 µM was successfully isolated via adaptive laboratory evolution over 802-day continuous passages under cadmium stress. Whole-genome re-sequencing was then performed and nine mutations were identified for the evolved strain compared to the wild-type strain. Among these mutations, a large fragment deletion in slr0454 encoding a cation or drug efflux system protein was found to contribute directly to the resistance to Cd2+ stress. In addition, five other mutations were also demonstrated related to the improved Cd2+ tolerance in ALE-9.0. Moreover, the evolved ALE-9.0 strain was found to obtain cross tolerance to some other heavy metals like zinc and cobalt as well as higher resistance to high light.

Conclusions

The work here identified six genes and their mutations related to Cd2+ tolerance in Synechocystis PCC 6803, and demonstrated the feasibility of adaptive laboratory evolution in tolerance modifications. This work also provided valuable information regarding the cadmium tolerance mechanism in Synechocystis PCC 6803, and useful insights for cyanobacterial robustness and tolerance engineering.

Keywords

  • Cadmium
  • Cyanobacteria
  • Adaptive laboratory evolution
  • Genome re-sequencing
  • Cross tolerance

Background

In recent years, environmental pollution caused by heavy metals has caused serious problems, including contaminating water, entering food chain and posing threats to growth of living organisms in nature [1, 2]. Among them, cadmium ion (Cd2+) is one of the most dangerous heavy metals [3]. Cadmium residues mainly come from industrial products like nickel–cadmium battery and pigmenting, which inevitably pollute a large amount of water [4]. Nowadays, cyanobacteria, which have been considered as “photosynthetic microbial factories” in the biosynthesis of fine chemicals and biofuels, have attracted much attention [5]. On the other hand, as one of the most dominant prokaryotes on Earth, cyanobacteria play a pivotal role in the global carbon cycling [6], while were threatened sometimes by the unfriendly environment. For example, it was reported that the cadmium concentration could reach 0.36 ± 0.82 mg/L (3.2 ± 7.3 µM) in the industrial area of Penang, Malaysia [7], which would pose significant threat to the survival of cyanobacteria. Thus, it is essential to understand how they respond to environmental stresses such as Cd2+. In addition, removal of toxic metal ions such as Cd2+ from water by cyanobacteria has been widely evaluated in recent years and is considered as a promising alternative treatment in wastewater purification [8]. For instance, a study on adsorption of Cd2+ by Gloeothece magna suggested that they would probably be cultivated in water bodies contaminated by Cd2+ to ameliorate its toxicity effectively [9]. Therefore, it will be of great value to decipher the tolerance mechanism to Cd2+ in cyanobacteria.

Cellular responses of cyanobacteria to high concentration of Cd2+ have been investigated in the past decades. In a previous study, the direct influence of Cd2+ to photosynthetic machinery was found to be multiphase effects in model cyanobacteria Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (here after Synechocystis). The results showed that Cd2+ first limited photosystem I acceptor side, and 7 h later, it disturbed photosystem II under the existence of light [10]. In addition, Cd2+ toxicity caused the generation of reactive oxidative species (ROS) and the consumption of glutathione as well as the thiol-group containing protein [11]. Furthermore, Cd2+ penetrated rapidly into the cells and replaced other heavy metals like Ca2+ and Zn2+ by competing for enzymes and disturbing membrane potential [12]. In another study, Cd2+ triggered the integrated reprogramming of the whole metabolism in Synechocystis, which was controlled by the Slr1738 regulator [13]. Meanwhile, some genes were found involved in resistance to Cd2+, like smtA in Synechococcus PCC 7942 [14] and sll0649 in Synechocystis [8]. Together, cellular responses to Cd2+ toxicity involved a variety of complex reaction mechanisms. However, up to now, the detailed mechanism of Cd2+ toxicity to cyanobacteria has still not been fully understood. Although some algae like Phormidium ambiguum and Scenedesmus quadricauda var. quadrispina show good tolerance to Cd2+ at the concentration of up to 0.35 mM [15], they are non-model organisms and relatively difficult to be deeply studied, while Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is a model organism with known genomic information [16] and relatively easily genetic operation, although it showed poor tolerance to Cd2+ stress [8]. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the Cd2+ tolerance of Synechocystis and understand how the Cd2+ tolerance is regulated, so that to guide the tolerance engineering in other algal or cyanobacterial species.

Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) is a strategy to improve strains via constant batch transfer under specific growth conditions [17], and has been considered as a powerful tool to generate robust strains with enhanced tolerance to multiple stresses [18]. Although it is time-consuming for strains to accommodate, systematic modifications on genome scale could be obtained through the ALE process [19]. Predictably, ALE could also bring other consequences like trade-off in growth or cross tolerance in alternative environments [18]. In addition, mature high-throughput sequencing and genetic manipulation systems make ALE possible for mechanism research and even further phenotypes modification [20]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, four strategies to isolate cobalt-tolerant cells were performed by ALE, yielding the most resistant mutant to cobalt stress from 2.5 to 8 mM, which indicated the efficiency of ALE to improve strains [21]. In addition, ALE was employed successfully in Synechocystis to improve 1-butanol tolerance from a concentration of 0.2–0.5% (v/v) and a further metabolomic basis for rational tolerance engineering was determined [22].

In this study, the ALE strategy was employed to improve the tolerance of Synechocystis to Cd2+ stress. As a result, after 128 continuous passages of approximately 802 days, tolerance of the evolved strain was improved from 4.6- to 9.0-µM Cd2+. With the aid of high-throughput re-sequencing technology, the mutations in the genome of the evolved strain compared with the wild-type strain were identified and further functionally characterized. This study demonstrated the feasibility of ALE in tolerance modifications and provided useful insights for cyanobacterial robustness and tolerance engineering.

Results

Adaptive laboratory evolution of Cd2+ tolerance in Synechocystis

Wild-type (WT) Synechocystis strain was evolved by serial passaging for 128 passages (802 days) in BG11 medium supplemented with CdSO4, as a selective pressure to enrich population with Cd2+ tolerance. The starting Cd2+ concentration for WT was set as 4.6 µM as our previous study showed that WT showed a slight growth deficiency at this Cd2+ concentration level [23]. Under normal BG11 medium without CdSO4, Synechocystis could achieve late exponential phase (OD750 nm = 1.5) from an initial inoculum (OD750 nm = 0.1) within 96 h. When CdSO4 was added, cell growth rate decreased obviously. In this ALE process, a simple rule was established that once the evolutionary strain could reach OD750 nm of 0.5 (from an initial inoculum of OD750 nm of 0.1) within 96 h, the Cd2+ concentration was increased. Thus, the Synechocystis strain was cultivated with increasing Cd2+ concentration from 4.6 µM gradually to 9.0 µM (Fig. 1a). Figure 1b demonstrates the simplified process of the ALE experiment, as a gradually increasing concentrations of Cd2+ process. Finally, after 128 continuous passages of 802 days, a strain that could tolerate 9.0-µM Cd2+ was obtained, approximately 95% improvement in tolerance compared with WT. At the end of ALE process, the evolved strain was plated on BG11 agar plate supplemented with 9.0-µM CdSO4. Four single colonies were cultured individually under 9.0-µM CdSO4 and the one which showed the fastest growth (data not shown; named ALE-9.0) (Table 1) was selected for further study.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Experimental setup of ALE process in this study. a Increasing CdSO4 concentration was from 4.6 to 9.0 µM. Agar plate supplemented with 9.0-µM CdSO4 was then used to isolate single clone. b Simplified evolution process of Cd2+ tolerance in Synechocystis. The x axis represented passages and y axis represented the simplified Cd2+ concentration. The specific evolved concentrations of cadmium were 4.6, 5.0, 5.4, 5.8, 6.2, 6.6, 7.0, 7.3, 7.7, 8.0, 8.3, 8.6, and 9.0 µM. Three points represented three strains for sequencing in this study. ALE adaptive laboratory evolution

Table 1

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Name

Description

Restriction site(s)

References

EZ-T™

A cloning vector transformed from pBlueScript II SK(+)

NA

GenStar

pCP3031

A suicide vector integrated between slr2030 and slr2031

NA

[24]

E. coli DH5α

F, φ80d lacZ∆M15, ∆ (lacZYA-argF) U169, deoR, recA1, endA1, hsdR17(rk, mk+), phoA, supE44, λ-, thi-1, gyrA96, relA1

NA

TransGen Biotech

WT

Wild-type Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

NA

ATCC 27184

ALE-7.0

A evolved strain just tolerant to 7.0-µM CdSO4

NA

This study

ALE-9.0

End-point strain of ALE

NA

This study

∆slr0454 WT

WT-∆slr0454::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0623 WT

WT-∆slr0623::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0721 WT

WT-∆slr0721::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0774 WT

WT-∆slr0774::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0798 WT

WT-∆slr0798::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr1302 WT

WT-∆slr1302::cmr

NA

This study

∆ssr1480 WT

WT-∆ssr1480::cmr

NA

This study

∆sll1586 WT

WT-∆sll1586::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr1753 WT

WT-∆slr1753::cmr

NA

This study

WT-C

WT-∆slr0168::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0454 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆slr0454::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0623 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆slr0623::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0721 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆slr0721::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0774 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆slr0774::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr0798 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆slr0798::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr1302 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆slr1302::cmr

NA

This study

∆ssr1480 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆ssr1480::cmr

NA

This study

∆sll1586 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆sll1586::cmr

NA

This study

∆slr1753 ALE-9.0

ALE-9.0-∆slr1753::cmr

NA

This study

ALE-9.0-C

ALE-9.0-∆slr0168::cmr

NA

This study

OE-slr0454WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0454WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/NdeI

This study

OE-slr0623WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0623WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0721WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0721WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0774WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0774WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0798WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0798WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr1302WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr1302WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-ssr1480WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ ssr1480WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-sll1586WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ sll1586WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr1753WT

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr1753WT _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0454ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0454ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0623ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0623ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0721ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0721ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0774ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0774ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr0798ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr0798ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr1302ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr1302ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-ssr1480ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ ssr1480ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-sll1586ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ sll1586ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-slr1753ALE-9.0

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_ slr1753ALE-9.0 _Trbcl sper

XhoI/BglII

This study

OE-C

∆slr2030slr2031:: Pcpc560_Trbcl sper

NA

This study

As shown in Fig. 2a, under normal BG11 medium condition without Cd2+, ALE-9.0 grew slightly, but not significantly, slower than WT, while under 9.0-µM CdSO4 condition, the growth of ALE-9.0 was dramatically better than WT, as WT can hardly survive under 9.0-µM Cd2+, demonstrating the improved Cd2+ tolerance in ALE-9.0. To show the effect of ALE process better, tenfold serial dilutions of WT and ALE-9.0 liquid cultures were spotted onto BG11 agar plates with different concentrations of CdSO4 (Fig. 2b). Under normal BG11 medium, WT showed little difference in growth condition with ALE-9.0. However, once Cd2+ was added, WT could hardly survive under 6.0-µM Cd2+, while ALE-9.0 still remained robust growth even under 9.0-µM Cd2+. In addition, ALE-9.0 showed a little yellow–green phenotype under the normal illumination of 50-μ mol photons m−2 s−1. Full absorption spectrum indicated that ALE-9.0 had less phycocyanin at 625 nm [24] but more carotenoid around 505 nm [25] than WT in normal BG11 medium (Fig. 2c, d).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Comparisons between WT and ALE-9.0. a Growth patterns of WT and ALE-9.0 in normal BG11 medium or under 9.0-µM CdSO4. The error bars represented the calculated standard deviation of the measurements of three biological replicates. b Effect of different concentration of Cd2+ on WT and ALE-9.0 on BG11 agar plate. The upper line of each picture represented WT and lower one was ALE-9.0. c Color of WT and ALE-9.0 at OD750 nm of 0.5 in normal BG11 medium. d Full absorption spectrum WT and ALE-9.0 in normal BG11 medium. Red curve represented WT and black curve represented ALE-9.0

Whole-genome re-sequencing of ALE-9.0

Notably, WT could only endure 4.6-µM CdSO4, while ALE-9.0 could survive in medium supplemented with 9.0-µM CdSO4, indicating that some intrinsic genetic changes occurred during the ALE process. Whole-genome re-sequencing technology was then employed to identify the genomic differences between ALE-9.0 and WT. Genomes of ALE-9.0 and WT were re-sequenced and compared with reference from the database to check out the differences (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_000911). In all, one deletion, nine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and four structural variations (SVs) were detected in ALE-9.0 compared to WT after the evolution process, and then, all these mutations were individually verified by Sanger sequencing. As a result, seven SNPs and one SV were identified, and the deletion turned out to be one insertion (Table 2). Among the confirmed nine mutations (seven SNPs, one SV, and one insertion), the insertion in slr1753 was located in a high repetition region with low mapping quality, the SNP in sll1586 was synonymous, while the others were non-synonymous. The only SV was a 659-bp-deletion located in the ORF of gene slr0454, which resulted in an early termination of a truncated slr0454 encoding a protein of 574 amino acids (the original gene slr0454 encoding a protein of 890 amino acids). It is speculative that these mutations might lead to an increased tolerance of Synechocystis to Cd2+ in the strain ALE-9.0.
Table 2

Mutations of the ALE-9.0 compared to WT

Position

Gene

Mutation

Protein

Mutated in 7.0 µM

Nucleotide

Protein

3506559

slr0454

SV

Early termination

Cation or drug efflux system protein

N

2961208

slr0623

T–C

P30L

Thioredoxin

Y

99738

slr0721

G–A

M113V

Malic enzyme

N

2401781

slr0774

A–G

G270R

Protein-export membrane protein SecD

Y

3061976

slr0798

G–A

Y207C

Zinc-transporting P-type ATPase involved in zinc tolerance

Y

306570

slr1302

G–C

P299A

Protein involved in constitutive low affinity CO2 uptake

N

1135407

ssr1480

G–A

Y24C

Putative RNA-binding protein

Y

1500784

sll1586

C–T

L496L

Unknown protein

Y

527831

slr1753

Ins(GAACCC)

1163PE

Hypothetical protein

Y

To investigate the roles of these mutations, one strain (ALE-7.0) evolved in the middle term of this evolution process and tolerant to 7.0-µM Cd2+ (Fig. 1b) was also selected, cultivated, and sequenced by Sanger sequencing concerning these mutations. The results showed that six out of these nine mutations found in ALE-9.0 were present in ALE-7.0 when CdSO4 concentration reached 7.0 µM. Thus, during the increasing concentrations of CdSO4 from 7.0 to 9.0 µM in this ALE, only three mutations (non-synonymous SNPs in slr0721, slr1302 and the SV in slr0454) occurred in the later stage of the whole ALE process (Table 2), indicating their roles in later improvement of Cd2+ tolerance.

Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of the mutated genes in WT and ALE-9.0

Besides the genetic differences between WT and ALE-9.0, the expression level of the mutated genes could possibly also change under CdSO4 stress conditions. To evaluate this hypothesis, five samples (WT cultured in normal BG11 medium and under 4.6-µM CdSO4, ALE-9.0 cultured in normal BG11 medium, under 4.6-µM CdSO4 and 9.0-µM CdSO4) were selected for qRT-PCR analysis. The expression change was presented by the ratio of the relative expression level of the genes under stress condition to that in normal BG11 medium, respectively, and a fold change > 2.0 was used as a cutoff. As shown in Table 3, expression level of most genes did not show significant changes in WT under 4.6-µM CdSO4 stress compared with WT cultured in normal BG11 medium, probably because that these genes did not respond to Cd2+ under this concentration. However, transcriptional levels of most genes were increased significantly in ALE-9.0 when CdSO4 was added. Particularly, the most significant changes were found in slr0721 and slr0798. Although the relative expression level of slr0721 had no significant change in ALE-9.0 under 4.6-µM CdSO4, it was up-regulated almost ninefold under 9.0-µM CdSO4. Meanwhile, slr0798 was up-regulated 17.5-fold under 4.6-µM CdSO4 condition and 36.5-fold in ALE-9.0 under 9.0-µM CdSO4, indicating its important roles in the tolerance to Cd2+. Another gene, slr1753, was also up-regulated 2.8-fold under 4.6-µM CdSO4, while 4.0-fold under 9.0-µM CdSO4. Transcriptional level of ssr1480 was increased by about 2.3-fold and sll1586 increased by about 3.5-fold in ALE-9.0 under both 4.6- and 9.0-µM CdSO4 stress conditions. Meanwhile, slr0623 was found up-regulated 2.3-fold under 4.6-µM CdSO4 and 1.8-fold under 9.0-µM CdSO4. On the other hand, the expression of slr0454, slr0774, and slr1302 was only slightly changed in ALE-9.0 under both Cd2+ conditions (fold changes less than 2.0).
Table 3

Relative expression of mutated genes in WT and ALE-9.0 under Cd2+ stress

Gene

WT + 4.6-µM Cd2+

ALE-9.0 + 4.6-µM Cd2+

ALE-9.0 + 9.0-µM Cd2+

slr0454

1.213 ± 0.188

1.266 ± 0.175

1.388 ± 0.073

slr0623

0.723 ± 0.103

2.362 ± 0.111

1.842 ± 0.017

slr0721

1.154 ± 0.137

1.410 ± 0.102

8.981 ± 0.0753

slr0774

1.126 ± 0.077

1.483 ± 0.121

1.960 ± 0.007

slr0798

0.723 ± 0.084

17.503 ± 0.097

36.548 ± 0.492

slr1302

1.050 ± 0.067

1.737 ± 0.070

1.359 ± 0.151

ssr1480

1.090 ± 0.064

2.208 ± 0.136

2.385 ± 0.062

sll1586

1.045 ± 0.256

3.623 ± 0.181

3.362 ± 0.041

slr1753

0.766 ± 0.128

2.792 ± 0.008

4.078 ± 0.218

According to the above results, the expression levels of six genes, slr0721, slr0798, slr1753, sr1480, sll1586, and slr0623, were significantly induced upon the exposure to Cd2+ after this ALE process, indicating their relevant roles in Cd2+ tolerance of ALE-9.0.

Screening of the mutated genes related to Cd2+ stress via knockout analysis

Gene knockout analysis was then used to evaluate the relationship of the nine mutated genes revealed by genome re-sequencing with Cd2+ tolerance. Relevant genes were replaced with chloramphenicol-resistance cassettes in WT and ALE-9.0 by homologous recombination, respectively (the related names of mutants were shown as ∆XWT and ∆XALE-9.0), and knock of neutral site slr0168 in WT (WT-C) and ALE-9.0 (ALE-9.0-C) was selected as controls (Table 1). 4.0- or 8.0-µM CdSO4 was added as additional stress for knockout strains derived from WT and ALE-9.0 to eliminate the intolerance to Cd2+ caused by poor growth.

As shown in Fig. 3, ∆slr1302WT showed significantly poor growth than WT-C in normal BG11 medium (Fig. 3d), while the others showed similar growth as WT-C, suggesting that only the knockout of slr1302 affected the growth of WT under normal BG11 condition. Under this circumstance, it cannot be told whether slr1302 was involved in Cd2+ tolerance or not. For the remained eight genes, under 4.0-µM CdSO4 condition, ∆slr0454WT, ∆slr0721WT, ∆sll1586WT, and ∆slr1753WT did not show significant difference from WT-C (Fig. 3a, c, h, i), while ∆ssr1480WT, ∆slr0623WT, ∆slr0774WT, and ∆slr0798WT demonstrated to be more sensitive to Cd2+ compared with WT-C (Fig. 3b, d, e, g), indicating that these four genes might be involved in Cd2+ tolerance in the WT strain. Among them, ∆slr0798WT could hardly grow under 4.0-µM CdSO4 (Fig. 3e), suggesting clearly the importance of slr0798 to Cd2+ tolerance in WT.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Growth patterns of WT-C and relevant knockout mutants in normal BG11 medium and under 4.0-µM CdSO4 at 30 °C. aslr0454WT, bslr0623WT, cslr0721WT, dslr0774WT, eslr0798WT, fslr1302WT, gssr1480WT, hsll1586WT, islr1753WT. The error bars represented the calculated standard deviation of the measurements of three biological replicates

The nine mutated genes were also knockout individually in ALE-9.0. As shown in Fig. 4, ∆slr1302ALE-9.0 showed the same growth pattern with ∆slr1302WT (Figs. 3f, 4f), suggesting that it also affected the growth of ALE-9.0; thus, no conclusion can be made whether slr1302 was involved in Cd2+ tolerance or not. For the remained eight knockout strains, under 8.0-µM CdSO4 condition, ∆ssr1480ALE-9.0 and ∆sll1586ALE-9.0 did not show significant difference compared with ALE-9.0-C (Fig. 4g, h). Notably, the other six mutants, i.e., ∆slr0454ALE-9.0, ∆slr0623ALE-9.0, ∆slr0721ALE-9.0, ∆slr0774ALE-9.0, ∆slr0798ALE-9.0, and ∆slr1753ALE-9.0 were demonstrated to be more sensitive to Cd2+ stress than ALE-9.0-C (Fig. 4a–e, i), indicating their vital roles in Cd2+ tolerance in the evolved strain ALE-9.0.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Growth patterns of ALE-9.0-C and relevant knockout mutants in normal BG11 medium and under 8.0-µM CdSO4 at 30 °C. aslr0454ALE-9.0, bslr0623ALE-9.0, cslr0721ALE-9.0, dslr0774ALE-9.0, eslr0798ALE-9.0, fslr1302ALE-9.0, gssr1480ALE-9.0, hsll1586ALE-9.0, islr1753ALE-9.0. The error bars represented the calculated standard deviation of the measurements of three biological replicates

Considering the combined results of knockout analysis in both WT and ALE-9.0, slr1302 was involved in the growth of both relative strains under normal BG11 condition though the relative mutants were more sensitive than WT or ALE-9.0 under Cd2+ stress condition (Figs. 3f, 4f). Therefore, it remained to be investigated whether it was also involved in Cd2+ tolerance or not, because the growth deficiency would also result in the sensitive phenotype under Cd2+ stress condition. For the remained eight genes, their involvement in Cd2+ tolerance did not fully match each other in WT and ALE-9.0, probably due to the different concentrations of Cd2+ stress, indicating the complexity of Cd2+ tolerance regulation mechanism in Synechocystis.

Confirmation of the roles of the mutated genes in Cd2+ tolerance by gene overexpression in the WT strain

To evaluate the roles of these genes, especially their mutations in modifying the tolerance of Cd2+, the original gene in WT and their mutated genes after evolution were, respectively, overexpressed in the WT strain using an integrative vector pCP3031 with a strong promoter Pcpc560 [26]. The constructed strains were named OE-XWT and OE-XALE-9.0. Meanwhile, the empty vector of pCP3031 was overexpressed in WT and the resulted strain OE-C was set as control (Table 1). The growth patterns of these constructed strains were monitored under corresponding Cd2+ stress condition.

Among these nine genes, overexpression of four genes, slr0454WT, slr0623WT, slr0721WT and slr0798WT, as well as their corresponding mutated genes, slr0454ALE-9.0, slr0623ALE-9.0, slr0721ALE-9.0, and slr0798ALE-9.0, successfully improved the Cd2+ tolerance compared with OE-C, while all these engineered strains demonstrated similar growth as OE-C in normal BG11 medium (Fig. 5a–d), further demonstrating that their expression levels were important for the Cd2+ tolerance. On the other hand, the overexpression of one mutated gene, slr0454ALE-9.0 exhibited better growth compared with the expression of slr0454WT, suggesting that the truncated Slr0454ALE-9.0 was probably more effective than Slr0454WT. Therefore, the results showed that both the expression level of slr0454 and the activity of protein Slr0454 were important for Cd2+ tolerance, indicating the vital role of this gene in Cd2+ tolerance. According to the NCBI annotation, slr0454 encodes a cation or drug efflux system protein belonging to Acriflavin–cation resistance (Acr) family. Consistent with our results, this kind of protein was reported previously to help Gram-negative bacteria to keep the intracellular homeostasis under high metal concentrations [27]. In addition, the result of protein BLAST showed that Slr0454 was homologous to inner membrane transporter, AcrB of Escherichia coli (E. coli), which has been found mediated resistance to ions including nickel, cadmium, and cobalt [28].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Growth patterns of OE-C and overexpression of positive genes in normal BG11 medium and under corresponding CdSO4 concentration at 30 °C. a slr0454, b slr0623, c slr0721, d slr0798. The error bars represented the calculated standard deviation of the measurements of three biological replicates

For the remained five genes, none of them showed positive effect on Cd2+ tolerance under Cd2+ stress condition when the WT or mutated genes were overexpressed (Additional file 1: Fig. S1a–e). Overexpression of three genes (i.e., slr0774WT, slr0774ALE-9.0, ssr1480WT, ssr1480ALE-9.0, slr1753WT, and slr1753ALE-9.0) even had negative effects on the tolerance to Cd2+, probably due to that the expression of these genes was already saturated, or their overexpression has brought extra metabolic burden to WT or ALE-9.0.

Cross tolerance to other stresses obtained in ALE-9.0

Possible cross tolerance of ALE-9.0 to other stresses was also investigated, including ZnSO4, CoCl2, CuSO4, high light, ethanol, and H2O2. The results showed that compared to WT, ALE-9.0 grew better under stress conditions of ZnSO4 and CoCl2 (Fig. 6a), while grew worse in other metal stresses like CuSO4 (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Notably, ALE-9.0 showed better acclimation to higher illumination intensity at 200-μmol photons m−2 s−1 than WT (Fig. 6b). Although ALE-9.0 grew slower than WT at the very beginning, it was able to catch up with WT at OD750 nm at day 5 and keep growing for almost 8 days, with the final OD750 nm greater than WT. In addition, WT showed a bleaching phenotype, while ALE-9.0 was still yellow–green after cultured for 8 days (Fig. 6c). H2O2 and biofuel ethanol stress were also investigated, while no enhanced tolerance (actually decreased tolerance) were observed between WT and ALE-9.0 (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Together, the results showed that along with the improved Cd2+ tolerance in ALE-9.0 during the ALE process, cross tolerance to Zn2+, Co2+, and high light (at late growth phase) were also obtained.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Cross tolerance of WT and ALE-9.0 against other stresses. a Cells growth at 48 and 84 h in normal BG11 medium, 20-µM ZnSO4 or 17-µM CoCl2. b Cells growth at 48, 120. and 192 h under 200-μmol photons m−2 s−1 in normal BG11 medium. c Colors of WT and ALE at 192 h under 200-μmol photons m−2 s−1 in normal BG11 medium

Discussion

ALE has been demonstrated as an effective approach to obtain desired biological properties of the evolved strain. The titer of d-lactic acid produced by the evolved strain has been increased 2.0-fold than the original strain in Leuconostoc mesenteroides [29]. In addition, adaptive evolution under thermal stress not only increased the survival temperature from 33 to 41.5 °C, but also conferred cross tolerance to isobutanol in Corynebacterium glutamicum [30]. In this study, ALE was also applied to enhance Cd2+ tolerance of Synechocystis and an evolved strain tolerant to 9.0-µM CdSO4 was isolated after 802 day series passages. The slightly slower growth of ALE-9.0 compared with WT under normal BG11 condition (Fig. 2a, b) could be ascribed to the trade-off character to balance tolerance of higher additional stress [31]. Considering changes in color and full absorption spectrum (Fig. 2c, d), since signal near 625 nm of full absorption spectrum was measured as phycocyanin content [32] and degradation of the phycocyanin caused a color change of cyanobacterial cultures from blue–green to yellow–green [33], ALE-9.0 demonstrated less phycocyanin than WT. In addition, phycocyanin was the major part of phycobilisomes for harvesting light and causing energy migration toward photosystem reaction centers [34]. Meanwhile, early study showed that lack of phycocyanin would result in poor light-harvesting ability [24]. Thus, we speculated that the light-harvesting ability of ALE-9.0 became weaker after long-time exposure to Cd2+.

ALE always brings about global changes at whole-genomic, transcriptional, and metabolomic levels [35]. In a previous research with Synechocystis, an acid-evolved strain identified 11 mutations in the genome, and the transcriptional differences were demonstrated by qRT-PCR [36]. A recent study improved isobutanol tolerance from 2 to 5 g/L with combinatorial malfunctions of three genes [37]. Consistently, in this study, nine mutations were identified by the whole-genome re-sequencing. Combined with knockout and overexpression analysis, out of these nine mutations, only the SV in slr0454 was demonstrated to improve the tolerance directly (Fig. 5a). As mentioned above, Slr0454 was homologous to AcrB. It was reported that AcrB cooperated with a membrane fusion protein AcrA and an outer membrane channel TolC to form an AcrAB–TolC system to export drugs [38]. In this study, the results also showed that the truncated Slr0454 contributed to tolerance of Cd2+ in Synechocystis, consistent with a previous study in Synechococcus sp. PCC 7942 showing the truncated form of the bacterial heat shock protein ClpB contributed to development of thermotolerance [39], probably by transforming the protein structure into a more effective conformation.

On the other hand, five mutated genes, slr0623, slr0721, slr0798, slr0774, and slr1753, were demonstrated to be involved in the Cd2+ tolerance in ALE-9.0 via knockout analysis (Fig. 4b–e, i). Among these five genes, although no positive effects were shown in the overexpression analysis between the WT genes and mutated ones, the increased expression of slr0623, slr0721, and slr0798 was demonstrated to contribute to the increased Cd2+ tolerance in ALE-9.0 (Table 3, Fig. 5b–d). slr0623 encodes thioredoxin (Trx) TrxA, which is a class of small redox proteins known to be present in most microorganisms. Consistent with our results, research in E. coli showed Trx was inhibited by Cd2+ and posed a positive role in protection from Cd2+ [40]. According to this study, Cd2+ directly bound to Trx by forming a chelator and decreased thiol-disulfide transferase activity, and this kind of Cd2+ sink might help against Cd2+ stress. slr0721 showed similar results as slr0623 both in gene knockout and overexpression analysis. slr0721 encodes the decarboxylating NADP-dependent malic enzyme, participating in tricarboxylic acid cycle. A study on malic acid and Cd2+ stress in Miscanthus sacchariflorus proved exogenous addition of malic acid could alleviate Cd2+ toxicity through enhancing photosynthetic capacity and restraining ROS accumulation [41]. Even though this phenomenon was widely discovered in plants [42, 43], we supposed that similar tolerance mechanism might also be utilized in cyanobacteria, while further evidences are still needed. It was noteworthy that expression level of slr0721ALE-9.0 in ALE-9.0 did not show significant change under 4.6 µM, but was increased significantly under 9.0-µM CdSO4 (Table 3). Meanwhile, Sanger sequencing showed that the mutation of slr0721 occurred in later stage after 7.0 µM (Table 2), indicating the possibility of different response mechanism that this gene was involved to Cd2+ stress. Finally, Slr0798 is an SmtB-like repressor concerning zinc-transporting P-type ATPase involved in zinc tolerance [44]. Consistent with the previous study in Synechocystis, overexpression of slr0798 gene with a replicative vector pJA2 could significantly enhance Cd2+ tolerance [23]. Unlike SmtB, Slr0798 triggered excess Zn2+ expulsion by via Slr0798-mediated efflux into the periplasm, which we supposed was the same mode for Cd2+. According to the qRT-PCR analysis (Table 2), the expression of slr0798ALE-9.0 was significantly up-regulated under CdSO4 stress, suggesting the importance of expression level of this gene in Cd2+ tolerance. The other two mutated genes, slr0774 and slr1753 shared similar functions related to membrane protein. These two genes showed involvement in Cd2+ tolerance in the knockout analysis, but neither could improve tolerance directly according to the overexpression analysis, probably due to that the expression of these genes was already saturated for Cd2+ tolerance. slr0774 encodes SecD, a part of Sec protein. The general secretory (Sec) pathway was considered as a major translocation process of protein from cytosol across the cytoplasmic membrane in bacteria [45] and SecD acted as an auxiliary component to enhance translocation efficiency [46]. It is then speculative that the mutation of slr0774 could lead to different efficiency of SecD or help SecD interact with other membrane protein better, leading to high Cd2+ tolerance. In addition, slr1753 was found as an outer membrane fraction for its homology to a cell-surface glycoprotein in Clostridium thermocellum [47]. Besides glycoprotein interacted selectively and non-covalently with carbohydrate and increase of EPS production enhanced Cd2+ resistance [48], it is thus supposed that the mutation of slr1753 possibly was able to help optimize the constitution and content of saccharide on cell-surface, leading to different Cd2+ tolerances. Since the ALE-9.0 could tolerate 9.0-µM Cd2+, except for the function of each single gene, the combinations of these genes and mutations to work together most probably also exist [30] which is still yet to be determined.

Mutations occur randomly during the course of ALE and are selected naturally when a particular mutation enhances the activity of a protein and/or thereby the better tolerant or survival [37]. For Cd2+ tolerance, some genes including slr0649, slr0946, slr1738, and sll1598 were also demonstrated to be related to Cd2+ tolerance in the previous studies [8]. However, these genes were not found to mutate during our ALE process, which might be due to, we supposed, the randomness of ALE experiment, and meanwhile, on the other hand, it was also possible that although these genes did not mutate, their expression level might change, which remains to be investigated.

As for cross tolerance, the evolved ALE-9.0 also obtained cross tolerance to Zn2+, Co2+, and high illumination intensity (Fig. 6a, b). Zn2+ belongs to the same group as Cd2+, which have the same chemical properties, consistent with that some mutated genes in ALE-9.0 like slr0798 also showed involvement in Zn2+ tolerance [8]. In addition, the previous studies have found that Cd2+ and Co2+ shared some similar toxicity mechanism [49] and Acr family showed resistance to Co2+ too [28], consistent with the finding that slr0454 involved in Co2+ tolerance. In addition, this was also confirmed in our experiments by the result that a higher tolerance to Co2+ was exhibited in ALE-9.0 (Fig. 6a). For high light, ALE-9.0 was hypothesized less sensitive to strong light than WT because of the poor light-harvesting ability [22]. At first, WT grew quickly as a result of enough light and ample carbon resource for downstream reaction, but later, the accumulation of ROS emerged became dominant [50] and caused the photo damage [24], while ALE-9.0 could absorb enough light only for growth and strong light did less harm to it, which also resulted in larger biomass of ALE-9.0 than WT (Fig. 6b). In addition, our results showed that ALE-9.0 did not demonstrate enhanced tolerance (actually even decreased tolerance, Additional file 1: Fig. S2) to H2O2. Although Cd2+ induces stresses including oxidative stress, tolerance of strains to Cd2+ involves many aspects like ion efflux and chelation [51], so it can be supposed that during this ALE process, the enhanced Cd2+ tolerance of ALE-9.0 may not involve oxidative tolerance. Besides, the ALE-9.0 grew slower than WT under normal condition, which may also result in the sensitiveness to most of other unrelated stresses such as H2O2.

Conclusion

In this study, an evolved strain ALE-9.0 of Synechocystis that could tolerate up to 9-µM CdSO4 after 802 day ALE process was obtained. The mutations in the genome of ALE-9.0 compared with WT were identified by genome re-sequencing. One mutation of slr0454 was demonstrated capable of improving Cd2+ tolerance directly and five mutated genes, slr0623, slr0721, slr0798, slr0774, and slr1753, were demonstrated involved in the Cd2+ tolerance in ALE-9.0. In addition, the evolved ALE-9.0 also obtained cross-tolerance ability to Zn2+, Co2+, and high light. Our work here identified six genes related to Cd2+ tolerance and demonstrated the feasibility of ALE in tolerance modifications. This work also provided valuable information to decipher the cadmium tolerance mechanism in Synechocystis and useful insights for cyanobacterial robustness and tolerance engineering.

Methods

Bacterial growth conditions

The wild-type Synechocystis, laboratory-evolved, and constructed strains were grown on BG11 agar plate or in BG11 medium (pH 7.5) under a light intensity of approximately 50-μmol photons/m2/s in an illuminating or shaking incubator of 130 rpm at 30 °C (HPX-9162 MBE, BOXUN, China, HNY-211B Illuminating Shaker, Honour, China) [52]. Proper antibiotic was added to maintain the stability (i.e., 20-μg/mL spectinomycin, 20-μg/mL chloramphenicol) of the constructed strains. Cell optical density and full absorption spectrum were monitored by a UV-1750 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) at 750 nm. E. coli strain DH 5α was used for constructing and collecting plasmids. E. coli was grown on LB agar plate or in LB liquid medium in incubator at 37 °C or shaking incubator at 200 rpm supplemented with appropriate antibiotic (i.e., 50-μg/mL spectinomycin, 50-μg/mL chloramphenicol, and 200-μg/mL ampicillin).

Adaptive laboratory evolution of Cd2+ tolerance

Adaptive laboratory evolution of Cd2+ tolerance was carried out in 20 mL liquid BG11 medium in a 100 mL shake flask. The CdSO4 stock solution was prepared with CdSO4·8/3H2O of analytical pure, purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). The initial WT stain was cultured with 4.6-µM CdSO4 from an inoculum of OD750 nm 0.1. Cd2+ concentration in BG11 medium was increased by 0.3–0.4 µM when the culture reached OD750 nm of 0.5 within 96 h. The simplified process is shown in Fig. 1b. To exclude the potential effects of the residual Cd2+ in the last passage, the culture was centrifuged and transformed into fresh BG11 medium during evolution. Serial adaptation passages were conducted until the final tolerance to CdSO4 achieved 9.0 µM. After confirming that the strain can survive under 9.0-µM CdSO4, the evolved strain was screened on BG11 agar plate with 9.0-µM CdSO4, and four clones were isolated and re-cultured in BG11 liquid medium. After re-confirmation of the tolerance, one clone showing greatest growth state was selected for further analysis (Fig. 1a).

Whole-genome re-sequencing

Isolation of genomic DNA was carried out as described previously [53]. Total DNA obtained was subjected to quality control by agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified by Qubit. The genome of WT strain and the evolved strain ALE-9.0 were sequenced with MPS (massively parallel sequencing) Illumina technology by a paired-end library with an insert size of 350 bp. This 350-bp library was sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq4000 by PE150 strategy. Original figure data obtained by high-throughput sequencing were transformed into raw sequenced reads (raw data, or raw reads). Then, sequenced data were filtered and the sequence of adapter and low-quality data were removed, resulting in the clean data used for subsequent analysis. Variation information of the sample and the reference is obtained by aligning the sample reads with the designated reference (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_000911). Final results involved SNP (single-nucleotide polymorphism), InDel (insertion and deletion of small fragments in the genome), and SV (insertion, deletion, inversion, and translocation of the large segments in the genome level).

Sanger sequencing

To validate the SNP, InDel, and SV revealed by re-sequencing, Sanger sequencing was performed. Primers used to amplify gene fragments are listed as “primers for Sanger sequencing” in Additional file 2: Table S1. The gene fragments were then ligated to EZ-T™ (GENSTAR, Beijing, China) by original TA cloning kit and the plasmids obtained were sent for sequencing.

Strains’ construction

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Among them, E. coli DH5α was used for vector construction and amplification. For knockout of relative original and mutated genes, the plasmids’ framework was obtained from above plasmid used for sequencing by PCR with primers for gene knockout (Additional file 2: Table S1), and then ligated with chloramphenicol-resistance cassette (amplified from a plasmid pACYC184). Then, the constructed plasmid was transformed into Synechocystis by natural transformation [54].

For genes overexpression, an integrative vector pCP3031 with spectinomycin-resistant cassette was used [26]. Relative genes were first obtained by PCR. Primers for gene overexpression are listed in Additional file 2: Table S1. Afterwards, target genes were ligated into pCP3031. The constructed plasmid was finally transformed into Synechocystis by natural transformation [54].

Both knockout and overexpression strains were verified by PCR and sequencing analysis.

qRT-PCR analysis

The qRT-PCR analysis was used to compare the gene expression level between strains grown in normal and Cd2+ stress conditions. Primers for qRT-PCR analysis were designed by Primer Express 2.0 and listed in Additional file 2: Table S1. Experimental steps were based on the description as previously [55]. Three technical replicates were used for each sample. Data analysis was performed via the StepOnePlus analytical software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) and the 2∆∆CT method [56]. The 16s RNA was used as an internal reference. Data were shown as ratio of the amount of genes’ transcript in WT or ALE-9.0 under Cd2+ stress to those cultured in normal condition without Cd2+ stress, respectively.

Growth profile analysis

To monitor growth profile under Cd2+, fresh cells were collected by centrifugation and then inoculated into 20 mL of BG11 liquid medium in a 100-mL flask. Three biological parallels were used for each sample. The initial concentration of cells was adjusted at OD750 nm of 0.1. Then, culture samples were taken and measured at OD750 nm every 12 h. For knockout mutants in WT, 4.0-µM CdSO4 was added, while for knockout mutants in ALE-9.0, 8.0-µM CdSO4 was added. For overexpression strains, three different concentration levels (i.e., 4.8, 5.0, and 5.2 µM) were set out for different genes.

Growth under other examined stress conditions was also measured in the same way as above. Concentrations of chemicals used were as follows: 20 µM for ZnSO4, 1.8 µM for CuSO4, 17 µM for CoCl2, 1 mM for H2O2, and 1 mM for ethanol. High light was set as 200-μmol photons/m2/s.

Abbreviations

Acr: 

acriflavin–cation resistance

ALE: 

adaptive laboratory evolution

Cd2+

cadmium ion

ROS: 

reactive oxidative species

Trx: 

thioredoxin

WT: 

wild type

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

CX performed the major experiments and wrote the draft manuscript; TS and SL helped with some of the experiments; CX and LC analyzed the data; and LC and WZ designed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of supporting data

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publication.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

The research was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 31470217, 21621004, 31770100, 31170043, 31270086, and 31370115), National Basic Research Program of China (National “973” Program, Project No. 2014CB745101), and the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (No. 15JCZDJC32500).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Synthetic Microbiology, School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education of China, Tianjin, 300072, People’s Republic of China
(3)
Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China
(4)
Center for Biosafety Research and Strategy, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Kar D, Sur P, Mandal SK, Saha T, Kole RK. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface water. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2008;5(1):119–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Tyler G, Påhlsson AMB, Bengtsson G, Bååth E, Tranvik L. Heavy-metal ecology of terrestrial plants, microorganisms and invertebrates. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1989;47(3):189–215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cullen JT, Maldonado MT. Biogeochemistry of cadmium and its release to the environment. In: Sigel A, Sigel H, Sigel RKO, editors. Cadmium: from toxicity to essentiality. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 31–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2014;7(2):60–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao X, Sun T, Pei G, Chen L, Zhang W. Cyanobacterial chassis engineering for enhancing production of biofuels and chemicals. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(8):3401–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shi M, Zhang X, Pei G, Chen L, Zhang W. Functional diversity of transcriptional regulators in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:280.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Abbas SZ, Rafatullah M, Ismail N, Lalung J. Isolation, identification, and characterization of cadmium resistant Pseudomonas sp. M3 from industrial wastewater. J Waste Manag. 2014;2014:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen L, Zhu Y, Song Z, Wang J, Zhang W. An orphan response regulator Sll0649 involved in cadmium tolerance and metal homeostasis in photosynthetic Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. J Proteomics. 2014;103:87–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mohamed ZA. Removal of cadmium and manganese by a non-toxic strain of the freshwater cyanobacterium Gloeothece magna. Water Res. 2001;35(18):4405–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Toth T, Zsiros O, Kis M, Garab G, Kovacs L. Cadmium exerts its toxic effects on photosynthesis via a cascade mechanism in the cyanobacterium, Synechocystis PCC 6803. Plant, Cell Environ. 2012;35(12):2075–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassier-Chauvat C, Chauvat F. Responses to oxidative and heavy metal stresses in cyanobacteria: recent advances. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;16(1):871–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Sas KN, Kovacs L, Zsiros O, Gombos Z, Garab G, Hemmingsen L, Danielsen E. Fast cadmium inhibition of photosynthesis in cyanobacteria in vivo and in vitro studies using perturbed angular correlation of gamma-rays. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2006;11(6):725–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Houot L, Floutier M, Marteyn B, Michaut M, Picciocchi A, Legrain P, Aude JC, Cassier-Chauvat C, Chauvat F. Cadmium triggers an integrated reprogramming of the metabolism of Synechocystis PCC6803, under the control of the Slr1738 regulator. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:350.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Morby AP, Turner JS, Huckle JW, Robinson NJ. SmtB is a metal-dependent repressor of the cyanobacterial metallothionein gene smtA: identification of a Zn inhibited DNA–protein complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21(4):921–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Shanab S, Essa A, Shalaby E. Bioremoval capacity of three heavy metals by some microalgae species (Egyptian isolates). Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(3):392–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaneko T, Sato S, Kotani H, Tanaka A, Asamizu E, Nakamura Y, Miyajima N, Hirosawa M, Sugiura M, Sasamoto S, et al. Sequence analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. II. Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of potential protein-coding regions. DNA Res. 1996;3(3):185–209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang T, Tremblay PL. An adaptive laboratory evolution method to accelerate autotrophic metabolism. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1671:149–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dragosits M, Mattanovich D. Adaptive laboratory evolution—principles and applications for biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12(1):64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Long CP, Gonzalez JE, Feist AM, Palsson BO, Antoniewicz MR. Dissecting the genetic and metabolic mechanisms of adaptation to the knockout of a major metabolic enzyme in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(1):222–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Conrad TM, Lewis NE, Palsson BO. Microbial laboratory evolution in the era of genome-scale science. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:509.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Cakar ZP, Alkim C, Turanli B, Tokman N, Akman S, Sarikaya M, Tamerler C, Benbadis L, Francois JM. Isolation of cobalt hyper-resistant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by in vivo evolutionary engineering approach. J Biotechnol. 2009;143(2):130–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang Y, Shi M, Niu X, Zhang X, Gao L, Chen L, Wang J, Zhang W. Metabolomic basis of laboratory evolution of butanol tolerance in photosynthetic Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:151.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun T, Xu L, Wu L, Song Z, Chen L, Zhang W. Identification of a new target slr0946 of the response regulator Sll0649 involving cadmium tolerance in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1582.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirst H, Formighieri C, Melis A. Maximizing photosynthetic efficiency and culture productivity in cyanobacteria upon minimizing the phycobilisome light-harvesting antenna size. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1837(10):1653–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu YP, Krogmann DW. The orange carotenoid protein of Synechocystis PCC 6803. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1322(1):1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun T, Li S, Song X, Pei G, Diao J, Cui J, Shi M, Chen L, Zhang W. Re-direction of carbon flux to key precursor malonyl-CoA via artificial small RNAs in photosynthetic Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11(1):26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Valencia EY, Braz VS, Guzzo C, Marques MV. Two RND proteins involved in heavy metal efflux in Caulobacter crescentus belong to separate clusters within proteobacteria. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13(1):79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffith J, Sansom C. Acriflavin-cation resistance family. The transporter factsbook. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p. 364–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ju SY, Kim JH, Lee PC. Long-term adaptive evolution of Leuconostoc mesenteroides for enhancement of lactic acid tolerance and production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:240.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Oide S, Gunji W, Moteki Y, Yamamoto S, Suda M, Jojima T, Yukawa H, Inui M. Thermal and solvent stress cross-tolerance conferred to Corynebacterium glutamicum by adaptive laboratory evolution. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(7):2284–98.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Ferenci T. Maintaining a healthy SPANC balance through regulatory and mutational adaptation. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57(1):1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Plank T, Anderson LK. Heterologous assembly and rescue of stranded phycocyanin subunits by expression of a foreign cpcBA operon in Synechocystis sp. strain 6803. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(23):6804–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Baier A, Winkler W, Korte T, Lockau W, Karradt A. Degradation of phycobilisomes in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803: evidence for essential formation of an NblA1/NblA2 heterodimer and its codegradation by A Clp protease complex. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(17):11755–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. MacColl R. Cyanobacterial phycobilisomes. J Struct Biol. 1998;124(2–3):311–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Z, Wu J, Zhu L, Zhan X. Activation of glycerol metabolism in Xanthomonas campestris by adaptive evolution to produce a high-transparency and low-viscosity xanthan gum from glycerol. Bioresour Technol. 2016;211:390–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Uchiyama J, Kanesaki Y, Iwata N, Asakura R, Funamizu K, Tasaki R, Agatsuma M, Tahara H, Matsuhashi A, Yoshikawa H, et al. Genomic analysis of parallel-evolved cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 under acid stress. Photosynth Res. 2015;125(1–2):243–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsusako T, Toya Y, Yoshikawa K, Shimizu H. Identification of alcohol stress tolerance genes of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 using adaptive laboratory evolution. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):307.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Murakami S, Tamura N, Saito A, Hirata T, Yamaguchi A. Extramembrane central pore of multidrug exporter AcrB in Escherichia coli plays an important role in drug transport. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(5):3743–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Clarke AK, Eriksson MJ. The truncated form of the bacterial heat shock protein ClpB/HSP100 contributes to development of thermotolerance in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(24):7092–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Rollin-Genetet F, Berthomieu C, Davin AH, Quemeneur E. Escherichia coli thioredoxin inhibition by cadmium: two mutually exclusive binding sites involving Cys32 and Asp26. Eur J Biochem. 2004;271(7):1299–309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Guo H, Chen H, Hong C, Jiang D, Zheng B. Exogenous malic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity in Miscanthus sacchariflorus through enhancing photosynthetic capacity and restraining ROS accumulation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017;141:119–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dresler S, Hanaka A, Bednarek W, Maksymiec W. Accumulation of low-molecular-weight organic acids in roots and leaf segments of Zea mays plants treated with cadmium and copper. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014;36(6):1565–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Hawrylak-Nowak B, Dresler S, Matraszek R. Exogenous malic and acetic acids reduce cadmium phytotoxicity and enhance cadmium accumulation in roots of sunflower plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;94:225–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Thelwell C, Robinson NJ, Turner-Cavet JS. An SmtB-like repressor from Synechocystis PCC 6803 regulates a zinc exporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(18):10728–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mori H, Ito K. The Sec protein-translocation pathway. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9(10):494–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsirigotaki A, De Geyter J, Šoštaric´ N, Economou A, Karamanou S. Protein export through the bacterial Sec pathway. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;15:21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Huang F, Hedman E, Funk C, Kieselbach T, Schroder WP, Norling B. Isolation of outer membrane of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and its proteomic characterization. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3(6):586–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Ozturk S, Aslim B, Suludere Z. Cadmium(II) sequestration characteristics by two isolates of Synechocystis sp. in terms of exopolysaccharide (EPS) production and monomer composition. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(24):9742–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Bartsevich VV, Pakrasi HB. Manganese transport in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(42):26057–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Latifi A, Ruiz M, Zhang CC. Oxidative stress in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33(2):258–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Andersen O. Chelation of cadmium. Environ Health Perspect. 1984;54:249–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Chen L, Wu L, Wang J, Zhang W. Butanol tolerance regulated by a two-component response regulator Slr 1037 in photosynthetic Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:89.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, Bult CJ, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Merrick JM, et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science. 1995;269(5223):496–512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Barten R, Lill H. DNA-uptake in the naturally competent cyanobacterium, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;129(1):83–7.Google Scholar
  55. Sun T, Pei G, Wang J, Chen L, Zhang W. A novel small RNA CoaR regulates coenzyme A biosynthesis and tolerance of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 to 1-butanol possibly via promoter-directed transcriptional silencing. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement