Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Characterization of type I and type II diacylglycerol acyltransferases from the emerging model alga Chlorella zofingiensis reveals their functional complementarity and engineering potential

Biotechnology for Biofuels201912:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1366-2

©  The Author(s) 2019

  • Received: 26 October 2018
  • Accepted: 30 January 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The green alga Chlorella zofingiensis has been recognized as an industrially relevant strain because of its robust growth under multiple trophic conditions and the potential for simultaneous production of triacylglycerol (TAG) and the high-value keto-carotenoid astaxanthin. Nevertheless, the mechanism of TAG synthesis remains poorly understood in C. zofingiensis. Diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) is thought to catalyze the committed step of TAG assembly in the Kennedy pathway. C. zofingiensis genome is predicted to possess eleven putative DGAT-encoding genes, the greatest number ever found in green algae, pointing to the complexity of TAG assembly in the alga.

Results

The transcription start site of C. zofingiensis DGATs was determined by 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), and their coding sequences were cloned and verified by sequencing, which identified ten DGAT genes (two type I DGATs designated as CzDGAT1A and CzDGAT1B, and eight type II DGATs designated as CzDGTT1 through CzDGTT8) and revealed that the previous gene models of seven DGATs were incorrect. Function complementation in the TAG-deficient yeast strain confirmed the functionality of most DGATs, with CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 having the highest activity. In vitro DGAT assay revealed that CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 preferred eukaryotic and prokaryotic diacylglycerols (DAGs), respectively, and had overlapping yet distinctive substrate specificity for acyl-CoAs. Subcellular co-localization experiment in tobacco leaves indicated that both CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 were localized at endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Upon nitrogen deprivation, TAG was drastically induced in C. zofingiensis, accompanied by a considerable up-regulation of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5. These two genes were probably regulated by the transcription factors (TFs) bZIP3 and MYB1, as suggested by the yeast one-hybrid assay and expression correlation. Moreover, heterologous expression of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 promoted TAG accumulation and TAG yield in different hosts including yeast and oleaginous alga.

Conclusions

Our study represents a pioneering work on the characterization of both type I and type II C. zofingiensis DGATs by systematically integrating functional complementation, in vitro enzymatic assay, subcellular localization, yeast one-hybrid assay and overexpression in yeast and oleaginous alga. These results (1) update the gene models of C. zofingiensis DGATs, (2) shed light on the mechanism of oleaginousness in which CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, have functional complementarity and probably work in collaboration at ER contributing to the abundance and complexity of TAG, and (3) provide engineering targets for future trait improvement via rational manipulation of this alga as well as other industrially relevant ones.

Keywords

  • Chlorella zofingiensis
  • Diacylglycerol acyltransferase
  • Trait improvement
  • Functional characterization
  • Transcription factor
  • Triacylglycerol

Background

Chlorella zofingiensis, a freshwater green alga also referred to as Chromochloris zofingiensis or Muriella zofingiensis, has been considered as a potential astaxanthin producer alternative to Haematococcus pluvialis because of its capacity of synthesizing astaxanthin and growing robustly under multiple trophic conditions for high biomass concentration [1–7]. It is also capable of accumulating high level of triacylglycerol (TAG), the most energy-dense lipid, and emerges as a promising feedstock for biodiesel [4, 5, 8–10]. Moreover, oleic acid (C18:1), which is thought to be beneficial to biodiesel quality [11], is rich in lipids of C. zofingiensis [5]. The integrated production of TAG with astaxanthin, a value-added keto-carotenoid with strong anti-oxidative activity and broad applications, has the potential to be achieved in C. zofingiensis [5, 10], and is believed to be a promising approach toward offsetting algal biodiesel production cost. Another approach to bring down production cost is genetic engineering for trait improvement, e.g., TAG modulation, which relies on a better understanding of the molecular mechanism for TAG biosynthesis [12, 13].

TAG biosynthesis is believed to be mainly from two pathways, acyl-CoA-dependent Kennedy pathway and acyl-CoA-independent pathway, which has been well documented in higher plants [14, 15]. The former pathway involves a series of acylation steps mediated by various acyltransferases. Among them, diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) catalyzes the last, also committed, step by transferring the acyl moiety from an acyl-CoA to the sn-3 position of diacylglycerol (DAG), and plays a critical role in contributing TAG synthesis [15]. To date, three types of DGATs have been well characterized in higher plants, namely, the membrane-bound type I (DGAT1) and type II (DGAT2 or DGTT) and the soluble type III (DGAT3) [16]. Intriguingly, higher plants generally contains a single DGAT2 [17], while algae have multiple ones, e.g., five for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [18] and Chlorella pyrenoidosa [19], four for Phaeodactylum tricornutum [20], and eleven for Nannochloropsis oceanica [21, 22]. This large difference may point to more complex regulation of TAG synthesis in algae. C. reinhardtii represents the most studied alga for DGAT characterization [23–26]. Notably, the study of Liu et al. [25], conducting for the first time both in vitro and in vivo assays of multiple type II DGATs, supported that they have distinctive substrate preferences and work in concert spatially and temporally to synthesize diverse TAG species in C. reinhardtii. Nevertheless, C. reinhardtii is a model alga and not considered as an oleaginous organism for lipid production, driving the research interest to industrially relevant algae such as N. oceanica [27–29] and P. tricornutum [30]. Recently, the genome of C. zofingiensis was sequenced and annotated [31], providing the genomic foundation for the characterization of DGATs. It has been observed that C. zofingiensis DGATs responded differentially upon various abiotic stress conditions [31, 32]. However, many remain unknown as to whether they are functional, their subcellular localization, substrate preferences and engineering potential in lipid production. Furthermore, it has been proposed that certain DGATs may catalyze astaxanthin esterification in H. pluvialis [33], further driving us to dissert the function and biology of C. zofingiensis DGATs.

The genome of C. zofingiensis is predicted to contain eleven putative DGAT-encoding genes [31], but their gene models have not been verified. In the present study, we cloned their full-length coding sequences with confirmed transcription start sites, and updated the incomplete gene models presented in Roth et al. [31]. A total of ten DGATs were verified and renamed: two type I DGATs designated as CzDGAT1A and CzDGAT1B, and eight type II DGATs designated as CzDGTT1 through CzDGTT8. A pioneering characterization of both type I and type II C. zofingiensis DGATs was conducted by integrating the analyses of in silico, subcellular localization, in vitro, and heterologous expression in various hosts. CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, which showed the highest acyltransferase activity, are ER-localized and have distinctive substrate preferences. We discuss their roles in TAG metabolism and biotechnological implications.

Results

Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of C. zofingiensis DGATs

Chlorella zofingiensis genome is predicted to contain eleven putative DGAT genes, two of which, Cz03g14080 and Cz09g23020, are exactly the same [31]. Nevertheless, their gene models have not been verified. Through further checking the chromosomes Chr03 and Chr09 where Cz03g14080 and Cz09g23020 locate, respectively, we found that the two chromosomes share a long fragment sequence (35-kb in common), which covers the two above-mentioned genes (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Considering that the chromosomes were assembled from the fragments of whole genome rather than of the isolated chromosome [31], a wrong assembly of this part may occur for Chr03 or Chr09. To validate this, primer pairs were designed for Chr03 (f1 + r1) and Chr09 (f2 + r1): f1 and f2 are specific to Chr03 and Chr09, respectively, while r1 locates at the site with common sequence (Additional file 1: Figure S1). PCR results using genomic DNA as the template showed that the former primer pair (f1 + r1) gave the expected band, while the latter one (f2 + r1) had no band (Additional file 1: Figure S1), indicating the incorrect assembly of Chr09. In this context, Cz03g14080 and Cz09g23020 should be at the same locus and assigned with the same name. o obtain the full-length coding sequence of the ten genes, here a 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) experiment was performed to determine the start codon and 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) sequence prior to cloning. Then, the full-length coding sequences were cloned and sequenced, which were renamed and deposited in NCBI Genbank with accession numbers: two type I DGATs designated as CzDGAT1A and CzDGAT1B, and eight type II DGATs designated as CzDGTT1 through CzDGTT8 (Additional file 2: Table S1). This is so far the highest dose of DGATs reported in green algae. All except CzDGTT6 contain introns ranging from 3 to 9 (Additional file 1: Figure S2). This is in consistence with N. oceanica in which two type II DGATs are intron-less [22]. Comparison between gene models of DGATs presented in Roth et al. [31] and our confirmed ones revealed that the previous gene models of seven DGATs were incorrect (Additional file 1: Figure S2). In this context, the genome annotation for C. zofingiensis from Roth et al. [31] remains yet to be improved.

To gain insights into the evolutionary relationship between C. zofingiensis DGATs and other orthologs, a cladogram was reconstructed using MEGA6 [34] based on the multiple sequences from higher plants, animals, yeast, and algae (Additional file 1: Figure S3). CzDGAT1A and CzDGAT1B, clustered with the algal type I DGAT orthologs, are distinct from type II DGATs. Of the eight type II C. zofingiensis DGATs, CzDGTT1 and CzDGTT2 are highly close to C. reinhardtii DGTT1, CzDGTT4 is close to C. reinhardtii DGTT4, CzDGTT5 is close to C. reinhardtii DGTT3, CzDGTT6 through CzDGTT8 are somewhat close to C. reinhardtii DGTT2, while CzDGTT3 is kindly distant from other type II DGATs. By contrast, N. oceanica DGATs are somewhat distant from C. zofingiensis DGATs. Although containing no intron, CzDGTT6 is grouped well within the CzDGTTs in the phylogenetic tree (Additional file 1: Figure S3), indicating that it may be of vertical origin rather than from horizontal gene transfer. Several DGATs from C. reinhardtii and N. oceanica have been well characterized both in vitro and in vivo [25, 27–29], providing insights into the function of their corresponding homologs in C. zofingiensis. When analyzed with TMHMM Server 2.0, C. zofingiensis DGATs are predicted to contain ~ 9 transmembrane domains (Additional file 1: Figure S4). The analysis of C. zofingiensis DGATs using PredAlgo, a new multi-subcellular localization prediction tool dedicated to algae [34], together with TargetP and ChloroP, suggests their localization other than in chloroplast or mitochondrion (Additional file 2: Table S2). This is in consistence with the subcellular localization prediction of DGATs from the green alga C. reinhardtii [25].

TAG synthesis and transcriptional expression of C. zofingiensis DGATs in C. zofingiensis

TAG synthesis and accumulation in algae can be triggered by abiotic stresses such as the deprivation of nutrients particularly nitrogen [35]. Obviously, upon nitrogen deprivation (ND), the chlorophyll content of C. zofingiensis showed a sharp decrease (Fig. 1a), implying severe growth impairment. By contrast, the per cell weight increases gradually (Fig. 1b), accompanied by a considerable increase in TAG, total fatty acids (TFA) and TAG/TFA ratio (Fig. 1c–e). The fatty acid composition of TAG was also impacted considerably by ND: C18:1 increased while the polyunsaturated fatty acids including C18:3n3, C16:3 and C16:4 decreased (Table 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Growth, lipid changes and DGAT expression in C. zofingiensis in response to ND. a Chlorophyll content. b Cell weight. c TAG content. d TFA content. e TAG/TFA ratio. f Transcriptional level of DGAT genes. The data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3)

Table 1

Fatty acid profile of TAG in C. zofingiensis in response to ND

Fatty acid

Culture time (day)

0

1

2

3

4

C16:0

18.7 ± 0.0

18.0 ± 0.4

16.7 ± 0.4

16.0 ± 0.1

15.7 ± 0.1

C16:1

1.9 ± 0.0

1.2 ± 0.0

1.2 ± 0.0

1.3 ± 0.0

1.4 ± 0.0

C16:2

2.8 ± 0.2

2.8 ± 0.1

3.4 ± 0.0

3.6 ± 0.0

3.7 ± 0.1

C16:3

8.5 ± 0.3

6.2 ± 0.1

5.3 ± 0.0

5.2 ± 0.0

5.2 ± 0.1

C16:4

4.0 ± 0.0

1.5 ± 0.1

0.9 ± 0.0

0.7 ± 0.0

0.5 ± 0.2

C18:0

2.4 ± 0.3

3.4 ± 0.1

3.5 ± 0.0

3.5 ± 0.2

3.4 ± 0.1

C18:1

19.3 ± 0.2

31.8 ± 0.7

34.8 ± 0.1

35.5 ± 0.1

36.2 ± 0.3

C18:2

16.2 ± 0.2

19.3 ± 0.0

20.8 ± 0.2

21.1 ± 0.3

21.0 ± 0.4

C18:3 n3

22.7 ± 0.1

13.6 ± 0.2

11.6 ± 0.1

11.3 ± 0.0

11.1 ± 0.2

C18:3 n6

1.4 ± 0.0

1.1 ± 0.0

1.0 ± 0.0

1.0 ± 0.00

1.0 ± 0.0

C18:4

2.1 ± 0.0

1.2 ± 0.0

0.9 ± 0.0

0.8 ± 0.0

0.8 ± 0.0

The fatty acid profile (%) is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3)

To correlate TAG synthesis with the expression of DGATs, the time-resolved transcript levels of the ten DGATs were determined by real-time quantitative PCR (Fig. 1f). CzDGAT1A, CzDGTT1, CzDGTT5 and CzDGTT8 had a higher basal transcript levels (0 h of ND) and were all considerably up-regulated by ND, yet their expression patterns differed: the up-regulation of CzDGTT1 and CzDGTT5 began earlier and was greater than that of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT8. CzDGTT6 also showed an up-regulation in response to ND. By contrast, the other five DGAT genes remained relatively stable at the transcript level. These results suggest the involvement of CzDGAT1A, CzDGTT1, CzDGTT5, CzDGTT6 and CzDGTT8 in ND-induced TAG synthesis.

Functional complementation of C. zofingiensis DGATs in the TAG-deficient yeast strain S. cerevisiae H1246

To validate the acyltransferase function of the ten putative C. zofingiensis DGATs, they were each introduced into the TAG-deficient S. cerevisiae strain H1246 [36], a system widely used for functional complementation of DGATs of heterologous origins including higher plants and algae [20, 25, 28, 29, 37–39]. The H1246 expressing the empty vector (EV) and CrDGTT1, a type II DGAT from C. reinhardtii with confirmed activity [25], were used as the negative and positive control, respectively. All transformants were subjected to staining with the fluorescence dye BODIPY (Fig. 2a), TLC-based neutral lipid analysis (Fig. 2b) and TAG quantification using GC–MS (Fig. 2c). Obviously, similar to EV control, the H1246 cells expressing CzDGTT1, CzDGTT3 or CzDGTT8 produced a trace amount of TAG, suggesting their null DGAT function in yeast. By contrast, other seven DGATs were functional as they, similar to the positive control (+), made H1246 to produce more TAG, yet to different extents. Notably, CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 were most functional, as evidenced by the highest TAG levels which accounted for 27.5% and 10.7% of TFA, respectively (Fig. 2c). The expression of functional C. zofingiensis DGATs also impacted the fatty acid profile of TAG in H1246: enhanced unsaturated fatty acids of C16:1 and C18:1 at the expense of saturated fatty acids of C16:0 and C18:0 (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Functional complementation of DGATs in the TAG-deficient yeast strain S. cerevisiae H1246. a BODIPY staining of H1246 cells expressing various C. zofingiensis DGATs. Left, bright field; right, fluorescent field. Green fluorescence indicates the BODIPY-bound lipid droplets. b TLC analysis of TAG. c Quantification of TAG, expressed as TAG/TFA ratio. d Fatty acid profile of TAG. EV (empty vector)-expressing H1246 strain was used as the negative control and C. reinhardtii DGTT1-expressing H1246 strain was used as the positive control (+). The data in (c) and (d) are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant difference compared to EV (t-test, P < 0.01)

It is worth noting that the yeast H1246 contains only four fatty acids (C16:0, C16:1, C18:0 and C18:1), much less than C. zofingiensis does [5]. The lack of certain fatty acids may affect the results of functional complementation for C. zofingiensis DGATs in H1246, which can be evaluated by feeding exogenous free fatty acid (FFA). Here, we tested the effect of three FFAs including C18:2 and C18:3n3 that are present in C. zofingiensis, and C20:5 that is a high-value omega-3 fatty acid, on TAG content and fatty acid composition. We hypothesized that if a DGAT had activity on the exogenously fed FFA, the FFA should be incorporated into TAG in the DGAT-expressing H1246, and verse vice. In the EV control lacking acyltransferases, the fed FFAs were not detected in TAG in spite of their presence in polar lipids (PL) (Table 2). Similarly, the H1246 strains expressing CzDGTT3, CzDGTT4, and CzDGTT6–CzDGTT8 each had no detected exogenous FFAs incorporated into TAG (Table 2), indicative of their null function on these fatty acids. By contrast, CzDGAT1A, CzDGAT1B, and CzDGTT5 all had activity on these fatty acids, as evidenced by their presence in significant percentage in TAG (Table 2). Intriguingly, CzDGTT1, which showed no activity in the functional complementation (Fig. 1c), incorporated the exogenous C18:2 and C18:3 into TAG and promoted TAG accumulation (Table 2), suggesting the activity of CzDGTT1 on the two fatty acids. On the other hand, CzDGTT2 showed no activity on C18:2 or C18:3 but was active on C20:5 (Table 2).
Table 2

TAG and PL analysis in DGAT-expressing H1246 transformants fed with exogenous FFAs

Strains

TAG (μg OD−1)

C18:2

C18:3

C20:5

TAG (μg OD−1)

C18:2 in TAG (%)

PL (μg OD−1)

C18:2 in PL (%)

TAG (μg OD−1)

C18:3 in TAG (%)

PL (μg OD−1)

C18:3 in PL (%)

TAG (μg OD−1)

C20:5 in TAG (%)

PL (μg OD−1)

C20:5 in PL (%)

EV

0.10 ± 0.01

0.21 ± 0.01

–

1.64 ± 0.02

21.85 ± 0.15

0.10 ± 0.01

–

1.87 ± 0.00

11.91 ± 0.87

0.14 ± 0.02

–

1.07 ± 0.09

2.90 ± 0.93

CzDGAT1A

1.09 ± 0.05

1.37 ± 0.05

11.51 ± 0.14

1.07 ± 0.12

5.51 ± 0.77

1.05 ± 0.02

7.18 ± 0.16

1.06 ± 0.04

3.05 ± 0.06

1.19 ± 0.02

22.39 ± 1.37

1.33 ± 0.01

4.68 ± 0.31

CzDGAT1B

0.24 ± 0.03

0.73 ± 0.01

12.20 ± 0.06

1.09 ± 0.01

12.02 ± 0.19

0.28 ± 0.01

19.91 ± 0.94

1.40 ± 0.04

15.16 ± 0.25

0.92 ± 0.01

14.15 ± 0.78

1.38 ± 0.01

3.86 ± 0.17

CzDGTT1

0.11 ± 0.02

0.36 ± 0.14

15.60 ± 3.23

0.92 ± 0.01

14.04 ± 0.00

0.24 ± 0.05

26.79 ± 8.79

1.08 ± 0.05

9.24 ± 0.25

0.19 ± 0.04

–

1.12 ± 0.08

4.83 ± 0.14

CzDGTT2

0.13 ± 0.04

0.13 ± 0.00

–

0.99 ± 0.01

16.37 ± 0.02

0.15 ± 0.00

–

1.24 ± 0.03

10.29 ± 0.42

0.50 ± 0.07

22.20 ± 0.79

1.21 ± 0.02

4.84 ± 0.05

CzDGTT3

0.18 ± 0.02

0.31 ± 0.03

–

1.64 ± 0.04

24.44 ± 0.44

0.29 ± 0.00

–

2.22 ± 0.02

22.19 ± 0.24

0.24 ± 0.01

–

1.02 ± 0.00

2.62 ± 0.08

CzDGTT4

0.10 ± 0.01

0.09 ± 0.01

–

1.13 ± 0.03

7.86 ± 0.34

0.20 ± 0.01

–

1.51 ± 0.09

23.49 ± 0.44

0.16 ± 0.03

–

1.20 ± 0.02

1.91 ± 0.19

CzDGTT5

0.27 ± 0.02

0.43 ± 0.03

11.99 ± 0.25

1.03 ± 0.02

14.23 ± 0.13

0.27 ± 0.00

9.83 ± 0.11

1.30 ± 0.00

14.84 ± 0.30

0.35 ± 0.04

4.08 ± 0.23

1.21 ± 0.01

1.49 ± 0.38

CzDGTT6

0.13 ± 0.02

0.08 ± 0.01

–

1.23 ± 0.04

16.09 ± 0.35

0.43 ± 0.03

–

1.68 ± 0.06

21.30 ± 0.04

0.18 ± 0.01

–

0.98 ± 0.00

0.86 ± 0.09

CzDGTT7

0.19 ± 0.06

0.26 ± 0.01

–

1.13 ± 0.04

14.41 ± 0.02

0.15 ± 0.01

–

1.27 ± 0.06

8.71 ± 0.35

0.14 ± 0.01

–

1.00 ± 0.06

0.98 ± 0.34

CzDGTT8

0.12 ± 0.01

0.19 ± 0.04

–

1.42 ± 0.06

24.91 ± 0.12

0.22 ± 0.02

–

1.79 ± 0.03

23.01 ± 0.48

0.16 ± 0.02

–

1.20 ± 0.14

0.50 ± 0.07

The data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). PL polar lipids, FFAs free fatty acids, – under detectable level

Acyl-CoA substrate specificity of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5

Although the exogenous FFA feeding experiments provided implications into the acyl-CoA substrate specificity of C. zofingiensis DGATs, solid experimental evidences are lacking, which can be addressed by in vitro assay. We have recently developed a non-radiolabeled DGAT in vitro assay [40], which allows for the measurement of activity and substrate specificity of DGAT toward a wide range of acyl-CoAs and DAGs, and has been well applied to DGATs from C. reinhardtii [25] and N. oceanica [27, 28]. Given that CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 showed the strongest acyltransferase activity (Fig. 1), here we focused on these two enzymes for in vitro assay. As the sn-2 position of TAG from C. zofingiensis contains mainly 18-carbon acyls [32], the eukaryotic C18:1/C18:1-DAG was used as the acyl acceptor for acyl-CoA substrate specificity assay. Overall, CzDGAT1A showed greater activity than CzDGTT5 regardless of acyl-CoAs (Fig. 3), consistent with the functional complementation results that CzDGAT1A made the yeast produce more TAG than CzDGTT5 did (Fig. 2). Specifically, for C16-CoAs, CzDGAT1A preferred the saturated one (C16:0) over the unsaturated one (C16:1); while for C18-CoAs, CzDGAT1A preferred polyunsaturated ones (C18:2 and C18:3), followed by the monounsaturated one (C18:1) and saturated one (C18:0) (Fig. 3a). CzDGTT5 also preferred the polyunsaturated ones of C18-CoAs (Fig. 3b). Nevertheless, for C16-CoAs, CzDGTT5 had a considerable higher activity on C16:1-CoA than on C16:0-CoA (Fig. 3b), distinct from the preference of CzDGAT1A (Fig. 3a). When the double bond number was the same, CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 both preferred shorter-chain acyl-CoAs, as indicated by the results that C16:0 and C16:1 led to more TAG than C18:0 and C18:1, respectively (Fig. 3). Intriguingly, both CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 had activity on the long-chain polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs of C20:4, C20:5 and C22:6 (Fig. 3), though these are not present in C. zofingiensis.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The in vitro substrate specificities of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 for acyl-CoAs. Lipids resulting from in vitro enzymatic reactions of CzDGAT1A (a) and CzDGTT5 (b) with various acyl CoAs were analyzed by TLC. C18:1/C18:1-DAG was used as the acyl-CoA acceptor. The numbers above each panel indicate the relative TAG values, normalized to that obtained for CzDGAT1A toward C18:3n3 (set as 100) by using the Image J software

DAG substrate specificity of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5

We further investigated the preference of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 for various DAGs, including one prokaryotic DAG (C18:1/C16:0) and two eukaryotic DAGs (C16:0/C18:1 and C18:1/C18:1). Obviously, regardless of acyl-CoAs (C16:0-CoA, C18:2-CoA and C18:3n3-CoA) used as the acyl donor, CzDGAT1A exhibited greater activity towards C16:0/C18:1- and C18:1/C18:1-DAGs than C18:1/C16:0-DAG (Fig. 4a), indicative of its preference on eukaryotic DAG over prokaryotic one for TAG synthesis. By contrast, CzDGTT5 preferred prokaryotic DAG for TAG formation, as evidenced by the fact that more TAG was produced with C18:1/C16:0-DAG than with C16:0/C18:1- and C18:1/C18:1-DAGs, particularly when C16:1-CoA or C18:3n3-CoA was used as the acyl donor (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

The in vitro substrate specificities of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 for DAGs. Lipids resulting from in vitro enzymatic reactions of CzDGAT1A (a) and CzDGTT5 (b) with various DAGs were analyzed by TLC. The numbers above each panel indicate the relative TAG values, normalized to those obtained when C18:1/C18:1-DAG was used as the acyl acceptor (set as 100) by the Image J software

Subcellular localization of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 in tobacco leaves

Type I and type II DGATs are membrane-bound proteins and are thought to be ER-localized in higher plants [41]. The compartmentalization of DGAT in algae, however, has been rarely touched and appears to be ambiguous [25, 27, 29, 42]. To confirm the localization of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, a C-terminally tagged GFP fusion was employed. As such a system is so far not available in C. zofingiensis, we chose tobacco leaf as the expression host: CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 were each transiently co-expressed in lower epidermal leaf cells with the mCherry-tagged ER marker ER-rk CD3-959 [43]. Clearly, the GFP signal was overlaid well with the ER marker for both CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 (Fig. 5), suggesting their localization at ER.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Subcellular localization of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 in tobacco lower epidermal leaf cells. DGAT::GFP was co-localized with a mCherry-tagged endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker

Possible transcription factors for CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5

Transcription factors (TFs) represent a group of regulators controlling their target gene expression at the transcriptional level through binding certain upstream elements. An increasing number of TFs that are involved in lipid synthesis regulation have been predicted and/or identified in algae, including MYB and bZIP [23, 44–46]. To screen the possible TFs for CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, eight MYBs and six bZIPs were evaluated. Yeast one-hybrid assay indicated that MYB1 (Cz02g00230) bound with CzDGTT5 promoter, while bZIP3 (Cz15g21170) bound both with CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 promoters (Additional file 1: Figure S5). Analysis of the promoter sequences by the software PlantPAN 2.0 [47] predicted many potential binding sites of MYB and bZIP (Additional file 3: Data S1), which were mapped at the promoter regions of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, with their 5′ neighboring genes (Cz06g05020 and Cz09g27300) shown (Additional file 1: Figures S6, S7). Similar to CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, MYB1 and bZIP3 were up-regulated by ND at the transcriptional level; by contrast, Cz06g05020 and Cz09g27300 showed little changes upon ND (Additional file 1: Figure S8), demonstrating the expression correlation between TFs with CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 rather than with their neighboring genes. In this context, MYB1 and bZIP3 are probably the TFs regulating CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5.

Engineering potential C. zofingiensis DGATs for TAG modulation in yeast and algae

To see if C. zofingiensis DGATs have the potential to improve TAG synthesis, CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 were individually introduced into the yeast strain INVSC1 to examine their impact on TAG synthesis. The overexpression of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 each had no effect on the growth of yeast cells (Fig. 6a), but promoted TAG accumulation considerably (Fig. 6b). Accordingly, the greater TAG yield was achieved in CzDGAT1A- and CzDGTT5-expressing strains, 6.7- and 4.5-fold higher than the EV control, respectively. The FA composition was only slightly affected by the expression of the two genes (Fig. 6c).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Overexpression of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 each in the yeast strain S. cerevisiae INVSc1. a Growth curve. b TAG content. c Fatty acid content of TAG. d Fatty acid percentage of TAG. The data were obtained from 48-h cultures and are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant difference compared to EV (t-test, P < 0.01)

We also introduced CzDGAT1A into the oleaginous alga N. oceanica to assess its effect on TAG production. No significant difference was observed in cell growth between the transgenic lines and EV control (Fig. 7a). CzDGAT1A expression in N. oceanica, confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 7b), resulted in a considerable increase (~ 2.8-fold) in TAG level in the linear growth stage (day 4) (Fig. 7c). The TAG augmentation was also observed in the stationary growth stage (day 10), though the increase extent was less than in the linear growth stage (Fig. 7c). Accordingly, the CzDGAT1A-overexpressing lines gave a high TAG yield, 58% greater than that of the EV at the end of culture period (Fig. 7d). The overexpression of CzDGAT1A also promoted TFA content (Fig. 7e) and yield (Fig. 7f). These results indicate that CzDGAT1A has the engineering potential in improving the production of lipids particular TAG.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Overexpression of CzDGAT1A in the alga N. oceanica. a–f Cell number (a), DGAT1A expression (normalized to endogenous β-actin gene) (b), TAG content (c), TAG yield (d), TFA content (e) and TFA yield (f) between CzDGAT1A-overexpressing lines and the EV. The data were obtained from 48-h cultures and are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant difference compared to EV (t-test, P < 0.01)

Discussion

Chlorella zofingiensis represents a leading algal candidate of industrial potential because of its ability to synthesize both TAG and astaxanthin, which can be induced by many factors such as nitrogen deprivation, sulfur deprivation, and high light [5, 10, 32]. TAG content and its fatty acid composition, two important parameters for evaluating the potential of an alga for biodiesel production, can be modulated by the expression of DGATs [27–29, 48], as DGAT is believed to catalyze the last committed step of TAG assembly and play a key role in controlling TAG accumulation. C. zofingiensis was predicted to possess a total of eleven putative DGAT-encoding genes [31]. However, we demonstrated that two of them, Cz03g14080 and Cz09g23020, had identical sequence and should be at the same locus of the genome (Additional file 1: Figure S1), indicating the presence of ten DGATs in the alga. To characterize the roles of C. zofingiensis DGATs, we cloned and identified the ten DGAT genes with confirmed full-length coding sequence (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Expression in the TAG-deficient yeast strain H1246, a commonly used system for DGAT functional complementation [36], confirmed that seven of the ten DGAT genes are functional, despite the large difference in enzymatic activity (Fig. 2). The functional failure of the other DGAT genes may be caused by the absence of certain fatty acids in yeast such as C18:2 and C18:3, which are present in C. zofingiensis. This holds true, at least for CzDGTT1, because the feeding of the two free fatty acids each made the CzDGTT1-expressing yeast produce more TAG enriched with the fed fatty acids (Table 2). It is also possible that some of these genes may encode not a real DGAT but other types of transferase, which cannot be distinguished based only on the sequence data. Among the green algae, C. reinhardtii is the best studied one for DGAT characterization: CrDGTT1 through CrDGTT3 are functional while CrDGTT4 is not [24–26]. Considering the close relation of C. zofingiensis DGATs (CzDGTT1, CzDGTT2, CzDGTT4, and CzDGTT5) to C. reinhardtii ones (CrDGTT1 through CrDGTT4) (Additional file 1: Figure S3), it appears that the functionality for DGATs is phylogenetically conserved. It has been suggested in H. pluvialis that DGATs may be involved in the esterification of astaxanthin [33]. To examine if C. zofingiensis DGATs catalyze the formation of astaxanthin ester, we expressed all ten DGATs in a reconstructed astaxanthin-producing yeast strain [49]. Nevertheless, no astaxanthin ester was detected, indicating the null function of C. zofingiensis DGATs in astaxanthin esterification.

The functional complementation experiment in yeast tells which algal DGATs are functional (Fig. 2) but not their substrate specificity, which can be addressed by in vitro assay. We have recently developed a nonradiolabeled in vitro DGAT assay featured by the use of widely available and regular acyl-CoAs and DAGs [40], which has been successfully applied to examine both type I and type II DGATs from algae [25, 27, 28]. By means of this assay, CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, which showed the highest activity in H1246 (Fig. 2), were evaluated with a wide range of acyl-CoAs present in C. zofingiensis. There have been many reports about the functional characterization of DGATs from algae, but mainly restricted to the complementation assay in TAG-deficient yeast [23, 24, 39, 50–52]. Only a few studies conducted the in vitro characterization of algal type I DGATs [27] or type II DGATs [25–28]. Our work here represents the first effort to elucidate the in vitro substrate preference of both algal type I and type II DGATs, which revealed the overlapping yet distinctive preference of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 for acyl-CoAs, e.g., CzDGTT5 had weak activity on C16:0-CoA and C18:1-CoA while CzDGAT1A had strong activity on these two acyl-CoAs (Fig. 3). Moreover, CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 accepted both prokaryotic and eukaryotic DAGs for TAG assembly, but CzDGAT1A preferred eukaryotic DAGs while CzDGTT5 preferred prokaryotic ones (Fig. 4). These results suggest the functional complementarity of type I and type II DGATs for TAG synthesis in C. zofingiensis. Unlike N. oceanica DGAT1A that has activity only on saturated and monounsaturated acyl-CoAs [27], CzDGAT1A is active also on the polyunsaturated acyl-CoAs (Fig. 3a). Similarly, CzDGTT5 and its close homolog, CrDGTT3 (Additional file 1: Figure S3), exhibit distinct preference for acyl-CoAs (Fig. 3b; [25]). N. oceanica DGAT2A, which is thought to originate from green algae [22] and somewhat close to CzDGTT5 (Additional file 1: Figure S3), also differs from CzDGTT5 in the preference for acyl-CoAs [28]. These differences indicate the diversification of DGATs regarding substrate preference and activity during the evolution.

In addition to the de novo synthesized fatty acids (C16:0, C18:0 and C18:1), C. zofingiensis TAG contains membrane lipids-deprived polyunsaturated fatty acids (Table 1), indicative of the contribution of membrane lipids to TAG. This is further supported by the fact that TAG accumulates at the expense of membrane lipids, particularly glycolipids [5]. The phenomenon appears to be universal as it occurs in many other algae including Chlamydomonas [25], Chlorella [53], Nannochloropsis [27], and Phaeodactylum [54]. In higher plants, it is thought that glycerolipids with a C18 acyl group in the sn-2 position are assembled via the eukaryotic pathway, whereas those with a C16 acyl group in sn-2 are from the prokaryotic pathway [55]. If this holds true for algae, Chlamydomonas and Nannochloropsis may involve predominantly the prokaryotic pathway for TAG assembly, as their TAG sn-2 position consists mostly of C16 acyls [27, 56, 57]. By contrast, C. zofingiensis TAG contains predominantly C18 acyls in its sn-2 position [32], and is, thus, likely contributed mainly by the eukaryotic pathway. Besides, C16:0 and C18:1 are the most abundant fatty acids in the sn-1/3 positions of C. zofingiensis TAG [32]. In this context, considering that CzDGAT1A prefers eukaryotic DAGs while CzDGTT5 prefers prokaryotic DAGs and CzDGAT1A has much higher activity than CzDGTT5 on the acyl-CoAs of C16:0 and C18:1 (Figs. 3 and 4), CzDGAT1A is likely to play a more important role in contributing to TAG accumulation in C. zofingiensis. Nevertheless, we could not rule out the possibility that the heterologous and in vitro results may not reflect the in vivo function of C. zofingiensis DGATs, although our previous studies have demonstrated the consistence among heterologous, in vitro and in vivo results for DGATs in other algae [25, 28]. In vivo characterization of zofingiensis DGATs will provide an additional layer of evidence, which relies on future investigation when the rational manipulation of the alga for gene overexpression and/or suppression is available.

Because of the blooms in algal lipids for fuels and value-added products, the characterization of DGATs has attracted increasing interests, from the model alga C. reinhardtii to industrially relevant oleaginous algae such as Nannochloropsis and Chlorella. These studies provide gene sources used not only in algae but also in higher plants for improving oil content and the fatty acid composition [26–29, 51, 58, 59]. It is worth noting that CrDGTT1 has a much higher activity than other C. reinhardtii DGATs and N. oceanica DGATs [25, 27, 28]. In the present study, CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, particularly CzDGAT1A, showed a considerable higher activity than C. reinhardtii DGTT1 (Fig. 2); besides, heterologous expression of CzDGAT1A promoted TAG production considerably in either yeast (Fig. 6) or the alga N. oceanica (Fig. 7). These data together indicate the superior potential of CzDGAT1A for oil modulation in oleaginous algae and maybe in oil crops as well. TAG accumulation involves a serial of collaborative steps and manipulating a single gene, e.g., DGAT mentioned above, cannot achieve a satisfactory need. TFs involved in TAG metabolism are of particular interest, because they master a set of genes for TAG synthesis and utilizing them as the engineering target could bypass the manipulation of multiple genes and achieve better performance in promoting TAG production [46, 60]. Moreover, the manipulation of TF has the potential to turn on TAG accumulation under non-stress conditions, thereby avoiding the stress-associated growth compromise, which would be of great benefit to biotechnological applications. It has been demonstrated that overexpression of certain TFs in algae led to enhanced lipid synthesis to various extents [61–64]. In C. zofingiensis, bZIP3, which probably regulates CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 (Additional file 1: Figure S6), represents an interesting target of engineering for increasing TAG production and is worth of trying in the future studies. The development of overexpression platforms for C. zofingiensis is underway in our laboratory, which will pave the way toward manipulating this alga for trait improvements.

Conclusions

Here, we performed an in-depth characterization of C. zofingiensis type I and type II DGATs by systematically integrating gene cloning and bioinformatics analysis, functional complementation in TAG-deficient yeast, in vitro DGAT assay for substrate specificity, subcellular localization, yeast one-hybrid assay for identifying TFs, and overexpression in different hosts for oil modulation. A working model was proposed for the role of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 in TAG biosynthesis in the oleaginous alga C. zofingiensis (Fig. 8). The fatty acyls de novo synthesized and/or recycled from the turnover of membrane lipids constitute the acyl-CoA pool and enter Kennedy pathway for the synthesis of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic DAGs. CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5, the two representative type I and type II DGATs, are up-regulated in response to ND and reside at ER. Differing from CzDGTT5 that uses mainly prokaryotic DAGs and has weak activity on C16:0- and C18:1-CoAs, DGAT1A prefers eukaryotic DAGs with strong activity on C16:0- and C18:1-CoAs, thus contributing more to the synthesis of TAG in C. zofingiensis. The prokaryotic DAGs may be translocated from chloroplast to the ER by diffusion along the lipid droplet-delimiting monolayer as hypothesized by Goodson et al. [65], and accessed by CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 for TAG assembly. Moreover, overexpression of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 genes promoted TAG production in different hosts including yeast and oleaginous alga. Taken together, our study represents a pioneering work on the characterization of both type I and type II DGATs from algae, which not only helps to better understand the mechanism of TAG biosynthesis in C. zofingiensis, in which CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 have functional complementarity and likely work in collaboration at ER for TAG assembly, but also provides insights into future genetic engineering of the alga by manipulating rate-limiting enzymes such as CzDGAT1A or TFs such as bZIP3 to modulate oil production.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8

A hypothesized working model illustrating the localization and possible roles of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 in TAG biosynthesis in C. zofingiensis. The de novo synthesized fatty acids, together with those released from membrane polar lipids, constitute the acyl-CoA pool. In response to ND, CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 are up-regulated considerably and localize at ER. DGAT1A utilizes more C16:0- and C18:1-CoAs than CzDGTT5 and prefers eukaryotic DAGs as the acyl acceptor for TAG assembly, while CzDGTT5 prefers prokaryotic DAGs for TAG assembly. The prokaryotic DAGs may be translocated from chloroplast to the ER by diffusion along the delimiting monolayer of lipid droplet, which has contact sites with both chloroplast and ER. Not all intermediates or reactions were displayed. ER endoplasmic reticulum, Cp chloroplast, FA fatty acids

Methods

Algal strains and culture conditions

Chlorella zofingiensis (ATCC 30412) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) and maintained and cultured in the Kuhl medium as described by our previous study [32]. Briefly, 10 mL of liquid Kuhl medium was inoculated with cells from agar plates and the alga was grown aerobically in flasks at 25 °C for 6 days with orbital shaking at 150 rpm and illuminated with continuous light of 30 µE m−2 s−1. The cells were then inoculated at 10% (v/v) into 250-mL columns (3-cm diameter) provided with constant illumination of 70 µE m−2 s−1 and aeration of 1.5% CO2 enriched air. For nitrogen deprivation (ND) experiments, the cells grown to late exponential phase were harvested, washed with nitrogen-deficient medium twice and suspended in this medium (cell density, 0.5 g L−1), and transferred to new 250-mL columns for growth. The culture conditions are the same as mentioned above.

Nannochloropsis oceanica IMET1 was from Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University Systems of Maryland. It was maintained at 16 °C on an agar plate of the modified F/2 medium (100 mg L−1 N and 4.5 mg L−1 P) containing 20 g L−1 sea salt and grown in 250-mL columns (3-cm diameter) provided with constant illumination of 70 μE m−2 s−1 and aeration of 1.5% CO2 enriched air [27].

Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of C. zofingiensis DGATs

To obtain the full-length coding sequence of C. zofingiensis DGATs, their transcription start sites were first determined by 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)-PCR using the SMARTer RACE 5′/3′ Kit (Clontech, CA, USA) and the 5′ GSPs (Gene-Specific Primers) primers (Additional file 1: Table S1). All of the amplified fragments were sequenced. Then, primer pairs were used to amplify the full-length coding sequences (Additional file 1: Figure S2): the forward primer was designed to locate right upstream the start codon based on the confirmed 5′ UTR sequence in our study, and the reverse primer was designed to locate right downstream of the stop codon based on the gene model from Roth et al. [31]. Using cDNA as the template, the primer pairs of all C. zofingiensis DGAT genes except CzDGTT7 gave PCR products. Analyzing its genomic sequence predicted the presence of an intron right after the gene based on the gene model from Roth et al. [31]; thus, an additional reverse primer was designed (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The full-length coding sequences of DGATs were verified by sequencing, which were deposited into NCBI Genbank with accession numbers (Additional file 2: Table S1).

Sequence alignment of DGAT polypeptides from various organisms was conduct using ClustalX2.1 (http://www.clustal.org/clustal2/) and the phylogenetic tree was generated using MEGA6 [34]. Conserved domains of C. zofingiensis DGAT proteins were detected through the NCBI Conserved Domains Search (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi). Transmembrane helices were predicted using TMHMM 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/). Subcellular location prediction was performed using PredAlgo program, a multi-subcellular localization prediction tool dedicated to algae (http://giavap-genomes.ibpc.fr/predalgo), TargetP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/), and ChloroP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP/). The prediction of potential binding sites of MYB and bZIP at the promoter regions of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 was performed with the software PlantPAN 2.0 [47].

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR

RNA extraction from algae samples and removal of contaminated DNA were conducted using the plant RNA extraction kit (TaKaRa, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total RNA concentration was determined by NannoDrop 2000c (Thermo Scientific, DE, USA) and the quality was checked by electrophoresis. The cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time PCR were performed as described by Liu et al. [25] using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNase H Plus) (TaKaRa). Primer sequences were used for quantitative real-time PCR, see Mao et al. [32]. The mRNA expression level was normalized using the actin gene as the internal control.

Functional complementation of C. zofingiensis DGATs in the TAG-deficient yeast H1246

The type I and type II DGAT genes from C. zofingiensis including CzDGAT1A, CzDGAT1B, and CzDGTT1 through CzDGTT8 (Additional file 1: Table S1) were PCR amplified using cDNA as template and cloned into the yeast expression vector pYES2-CT (Invitrogen, CA, USA). PCR primers for cloning are listed in Additional file 1: Table S3. After confirmation by restriction enzyme digestion and sequencing, the recombinant pYES2-DGAT plasmids were each transformed into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TAG-deficient quadruple mutant strain H1246 [36] using S.c. EasyComp Transformation Kit (Invitrogen). Colony PCR was used to verify the presence of the plasmids in the transformants. H1246 cells carrying the empty vector pYES2-CT (EV control) and pYES2-CrDGTT1 (containing a type II DGAT gene from C. reinhardtii) were from Liu et al. [25]. The expression of DGATs was induced by 2% (w/v) galactose in SD/-ura medium [40]. When necessary, free fatty acids were fed to yeast cultures as described by Siloto et al. [37], with supplementation of linoleic acid (C18:2), α-linolenic acid (C18:3n3), and eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n3) at a concentration of 125 µM upon galactose induction.

After induction with galactose for 2 days, H1246 cells were harvested for lipid extraction and analysis (see below section) and staining with BODIPY 493/503 (Invitrogen), a neutral lipid-specific fluorescent dye. The lipid droplets in the cells stained with BODIPY (at a working concentration of 10 μg mL−1) were visualized under fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan).

In vitro enzymatic assay for C. zofingiensis DGATs

The H1244 transformants bearing CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 were each grown in liquid SD/-ura medium containing 2% (w/v) galactose for 18 h at 30 °C, and then harvested for microsome preparation using a French pressure cell (Spectronics Instruments, NY, USA). The detailed procedures were described by Liu et al. [40]. The resulting microsomal membrane pellets were resuspended in microsome storage buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol) to give a protein concentration of 10 µg µL−1 for immediate use or stored at − 80 °C.

The in vitro DGAT assay was conducted according to our previously described procedures [40]. The acyl-CoAs tested included palmitoyl-CoA (C16:0-CoA), hexadecenoyl-CoA (C16:1-CoA), stearoyl-CoA (C18:0-CoA), oleoyl-CoA (C18:1-CoA), linoleoyl-CoA (C18:2-CoA), α-linolenoyl-CoA (C18:3n3-CoA), γ-linolenoyl-CoA (C18:3n6-CoA), arachidonyl-CoA (C20:4-CoA), eicosapentaenoyl-CoA (C20:5-CoA), and docosahexaenoyl-CoA (C22:6-CoA). The DAGs tested were C18:1/C16:0-, C16:0/C18:1-, and C18:1/C18:1-DAGs. C16:0/C18:1- and C18:1/C18:1-DAGs were purchased from Larodan Fine Chemicals (Malmo, Sweden), whereas C18:1/C16:0-DAG was prepared by partial digestion of C18:1/C16:0/C18:1-TAG (Larodan Fine Chemicals) with Rhizopus arrhizus lipase (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and recovery of DAG.

Subcellular localization of C. zofingiensis DGATs in tobacco leaves

To examine the subcellular localization, the coding sequences of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 were each amplified without the stop codon and fused in frame to the upstream of GFP in the modified binary vector pCAMBIA 1300 [66]. The resulting constructs, CzDGAT1A::GFP and CzDGTT5::GFP, were each introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression in tobacco leaves was employed for co-localization experiments [67], using the mCherry-tagged endoplasmic reticulum marker (ER-rk; CD3-959) from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center [43], together with CzDGAT1A::GFP or CzDGTT5::GFP. After 3 days of infiltration, cells from the lower epidermis were sampled for microscopic analyses, using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Nikon C1, Japan). The excitation wavelengths for GFP and mCherry were 488 and 543 nm, respectively, and the emission filter wavelengths were 505–530 nm for GFP and 560–615 nm for mCherry.

Yeast one-hybrid assay

The 2-kb promoter regions (upstream of start codon) of CzDGAT1A and CzDGTT5 were individually cloned into pLacZi2μ (Clontech), while the coding sequences of TFs including eight MYBs and six bZIPs were each cloned into pJG4-5 vector (Clontech). The yeast one-hybrid assay was performed by co-introducing pLacZi2μ-promoter and pJG-TF into the yeast strain EGY48, as described in the Yeast Protocols Handbook (Clontech). Transformants were grown on the synthetic dextrose plates lacking Ura and Trp, but containing X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-b-dgalactopyranoside). The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2 days for color development.

Overexpression of C. zofingiensis DGATs in the yeast strain INVSC1 and marine alga N. oceanica

The plasmids pYES2-CzDGAT1A and pYES2-CzDGTT5 mentioned above were transformed into the TAG-producing S. cerevisiae strain INVSC1 using S.c. EasyComp™ Transformation Kit (Invitrogen). Transformants were selected on SD/-ura plates and verified by colony PCR. The expression of C. zofingiensis DGATs in yeast was induced by 2% (w/v) galactose.

For the expression of C. zofingiensis DGATs in the oleaginous alga N. oceanica, the coding sequence of CzDGAT1A was amplified and cloned into the overexpression vector as described in our previous study [27]. Nuclear transformation of N. oceanica was performed by electroporation according to Li et al. [68]. Transformants were selected on modified F/2 plates with 2.5 μg mL−1 zeocin (Life Technologies, CA, USA) and verified by genomic PCR. Quantitative real-time PCR was employed to determine the overexpression level of CzDGAT1A.

Analytical methods

Chlorophylls were extracted from the fresh algal cell pellets with acetone, and concentrations were calculated from the absorbance values at 645 and 663 nm according to Li et al. [69].

Lipid extracts from yeast, C. zofingiensis, and N. oceanica cells as well as the in vitro DGAT assay mixture were all performed according to our previously described procedures [25, 40].

Neutral lipids were separated on a Silica gel 60 TLC plate (EMD Chemicals, Merck, Germany) using a mixture of hexane/tert-butylmethyl ether/acetic acid (80/20/2, by volume) as the mobile phase. Then lipids were observed by spraying the TLC plate with 10% CuSO4 in 8% phosphoric acid and charring at 180 °C for 3 min [25]. For quantification, lipids on TLC plate were visualized with iodine vapor, and the silica gel corresponding to each lipid fraction was carefully scrapped off the TLC plate. Lipids were transesterified to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) and analyzed by a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) equipped with a DB-WAX capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) (Agilent, CA, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas with the flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The ion temperature and interface temperature were set at 200 °C and 240 °C, respectively. Samples were injected in split mode (19:1 split ratio) at an oven temperature of 45 °C with an injection volume of 1 μL. The oven temperature was raised to 150 °C at 15 °C min−1, then to 240 °C at 6 °C min−1 and held at 240 °C for 6 min. Total lipids were quantified as the fatty acids contained in the total lipids, namely total fatty acids (TFA), and TAG was quantified as the fatty acids in TAG.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were determined in biological triplicate to ensure the reproducibility. Experimental results were obtained as the mean value ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Paired-samples t-test was used for two group means. The statistical significances are achieved when P < 0.01.

Abbreviations

CoA: 

coenzyme A

Cp: 

chloroplast

C. zofingiensis : 

Chlorella zofingiensis

DAG: 

diacylglycerol

DGAT: 

diacylglycerol acyltransferase

DGAT1: 

type I DGAT

DGAT2/DGTT: 

type II DGAT

DGAT3: 

type III DGAT

DGDG: 

digalactosyl diacylglycerol

ER: 

endoplasmic reticulum

EV: 

empty vector

FFA: 

free fatty acid

GC–MS: 

gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

GFP: 

green fluorescent protein

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

RACE: 

rapid amplification of cDNA ends

TAG: 

triacylglycerol

TF: 

transcription factor

TFA: 

total fatty acids

TLC: 

thin-layer chromatography

UTR: 

untranslated region

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JL and XM conceived the study and designed the experiments. XM, TW, YS, YK and YZ conducted the experiments. XM and JL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Hanhua Hu at Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for assistance on Nannochloropsis oceanica transformation, and Professor Hongwei Yu at Zhejiang University for providing the astaxanthin-producing yeast strain.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work is partially supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571807), National Youth Thousand Talents Program of China, and Peking University CCUS project supported by BHP Billiton.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory for Algae Biotechnology & Innovation, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
(2)
BIC-ESAT, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

References

  1. Del Campo JA, Rodriguez H, Moreno J, Vargas MA, Rivas J, Guerrero MG. Accumulation of astaxanthin and lutein in Chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyta). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:848–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Orosa M, Torres E, Fidalgo P, Abalde J. Production and analysis of secondary carotenoids in green algae. J Appl Phycol. 2000;12:553–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sun N, Wang Y, Li Y-T, Huang J-C, Chen F. Sugar-based growth, astaxanthin accumulation and carotenogenic transcription of heterotrophic Chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyta). Process Biochem. 2008;43:1288–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu J, Huang J, Jiang Y, Chen F. Molasses-based growth and production of oil and astaxanthin by Chlorella zofingiensis. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:393–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu J, Mao X, Zhou W, Guarnieri MT. Simultaneous production of triacylglycerol and high-value carotenoids by the astaxanthin-producing oleaginous green microalga Chlorella zofingiensis. Bioresour Technol. 2016;214:319–27.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu J, Sun Z, Gerken H, Liu Z, Jiang Y, Chen F. Chlorella zofingiensis as an alternative microalgal producer of astaxanthin: biology and industrial potential. Mar Drugs. 2014;12:3487–515.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu J, Sun Z, Zhong Y, Gerken H, Huang J, Chen F. Utilization of cane molasses towards cost-saving astaxanthin production by a Chlorella zofingiensis mutant. J Appl Phycol. 2013;25:1447–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu J, Huang J, Fan KW, Jiang Y, Zhong Y, Sun Z, et al. Production potential of Chlorella zofingienesis as a feedstock for biodiesel. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8658–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu J, Huang J, Sun Z, Zhong Y, Jiang Y, Chen F. Differential lipid and fatty acid profiles of photoautotrophic and heterotrophic Chlorella zofingiensis: assessment of algal oils for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:106–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Mulders KJM, Janssen JH, Martens DE, Wijffels RH, Lamers PP. Effect of biomass concentration on secondary carotenoids and triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation in nitrogen-depleted Chlorella zofingiensis. Algal Res. 2014;6(Part A):8–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Knothe G. Improving biodiesel fuel properties by modifying fatty ester composition. Energy Environ Sci. 2009;2:759–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenka SK, Carbonaro N, Park R, Miller SM, Thorpe I, Li Y. Current advances in molecular, biochemical, and computational modeling analysis of microalgal triacylglycerol biosynthesis. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:1046–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zienkiewicz K, Du Z-Y, Ma W, Vollheyde K, Benning C. Stress-induced neutral lipid biosynthesis in microalgae—molecular, cellular and physiological insights. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1861:1269–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bates PD, Browse J. The significance of different diacylgycerol synthesis pathways on plant oil composition and bioengineering. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3:147.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Li-Beisson Y, Shorrosh B, Beisson F, Andersson MX, Arondel V, Bates PD, et al. Acyl-lipid metabolism. Arabidopsis Book. 2010;8:e0133.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu Y, Caldo KMP, Pal-Nath D, Ozga J, Lemieux MJ, Weselake RJ, et al. Properties and biotechnological applications of acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase and phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase from terrestrial plants and microalgae. Lipids. 2018;53:663–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Cao H. Structure-function analysis of diacylglycerol acyltransferase sequences from 70 organisms. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:249.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller R, Wu G, Deshpande RR, Vieler A, Gartner K, Li X, et al. Changes in transcript abundance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii following nitrogen deprivation predict diversion of metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:1737–52.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fan J, Cui Y, Wan M, Wang W, Li Y. Lipid accumulation and biosynthesis genes response of the oleaginous Chlorella pyrenoidosa under three nutrition stressors. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:17.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gong Y, Zhang J, Guo X, Wan X, Liang Z, Hu CJ, et al. Identification and characterization of PtDGAT2B, an acyltransferase of the DGAT2 acyl-Coenzyme A: diacylglycerol acyltransferase family in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. FEBS Lett. 2013;587:481–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Vieler A, Wu G, Tsai C-H, Bullard B, Cornish AJ, Harvey C, et al. Genome, functional gene annotation, and nuclear transformation of the heterokont oleaginous Alga Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003064.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang D, Ning K, Li J, Hu J, Han D, Wang H, et al. Nannochloropsis genomes reveal evolution of microalgal oleaginous traits. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004094.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Boyle NR, Page MD, Liu B, Blaby IK, Casero D, Kropat J, et al. Three acyltransferases and nitrogen-responsive regulator are implicated in nitrogen starvation-induced triacylglycerol accumulation in Chlamydomonas. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:15811–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hung C-H, Ho M-Y, Kanehara K, Nakamura Y. Functional study of diacylglycerol acyltransferase type 2 family in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. FEBS Lett. 2013;587:2364–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu J, Han D, Yoon K, Hu Q, Li Y. Characterization of type 2 diacylglycerol acyltransferases in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii reveals their distinct substrate specificities and functions in triacylglycerol biosynthesis. Plant J. 2016;86:3–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanjaya, Miller R, Durrett TP, Kosma DK, Lydic TA, Muthan B, et al. Altered lipid composition and enhanced nutritional value of Arabidopsis leaves following introduction of an algal diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2. Plant Cell. 2013;25:677–93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei H, Shi Y, Ma X, Pan Y, Hu H, Li Y, et al. A type-I diacylglycerol acyltransferase modulates triacylglycerol biosynthesis and fatty acid composition in the oleaginous microalga, Nannochloropsis oceanica. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:174.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Xin Y, Lu Y, Lee Y-Y, Wei L, Jia J, Wang Q, et al. Producing designer oils in industrial microalgae by rational modulation of co-evolving type-2 diacylglycerol acyltransferases. Mol Plant. 2017;10:1523–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zienkiewicz K, Zienkiewicz A, Poliner E, Du Z-Y, Vollheyde K, Herrfurth C, et al. Nannochloropsis, a rich source of diacylglycerol acyltransferases for engineering of triacylglycerol content in different hosts. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Cui Y, Zhao J, Wang Y, Qin S, Lu Y. Characterization and engineering of a dual-function diacylglycerol acyltransferase in the oleaginous marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:32.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Roth MS, Cokus SJ, Gallaher SD, Walter A, Lopez D, Erickson E, et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly and transcriptome of the green alga Chromochloris zofingiensis illuminates astaxanthin production. Proc Natl Aca Sci USA. 2017;114:4296–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mao X, Wu T, Sun D, Zhang Z, Chen F. Differential responses of the green microalga Chlorella zofingiensis to the starvation of various nutrients for oil and astaxanthin production. Bioresour Technol. 2018;249:791–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen G, Wang B, Han D, Sommerfeld M, Lu Y, Chen F, et al. Molecular mechanisms of the coordination between astaxanthin and fatty acid biosynthesis in Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae). Plant J. 2015;81:95–107.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, Jarvis E, Ghirardi M, Posewitz M, Seibert M, et al. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. Plant J. 2008;54:621–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sandager L, Gustavsson MH, Stahl U, Dahlqvist A, Wiberg E, Banas A, et al. Storage lipid synthesis is non-essential in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:6478–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Siloto RP, Truksa M, He X, McKeon T, Weselake R. Simple methods to detect triacylglycerol biosynthesis in a yeast-based recombinant system. Lipids. 2009;44:963–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Shockey JM, Gidda SK, Chapital DC, Kuan JC, Dhanoa PK, Bland JM, et al. Tung tree DGAT1 and DGAT2 have nonredundant functions in triacylglycerol biosynthesis and are localized to different subdomains of the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2294–313.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Guiheneuf F, Leu S, Zarka A, Khozin-Goldberg I, Khalilov I, Boussiba S. Cloning and molecular characterization of a novel acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1-like gene (PtDGAT1) from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. FEBS J. 2011;278:3651–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu J, Lee Y-Y, Mao X, Li Y. A simple and reproducible non-radiolabeled in vitro assay for recombinant acyltransferases involved in triacylglycerol biosynthesis. J Appl Phycol. 2017;29:323–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Chapman KD, Ohlrogge JB. Compartmentation of triacylglycerol accumulation in plants. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:2288–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Manandhar-Shrestha K, Hildebrand M. Characterization and manipulation of a DGAT2 from the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: improved TAG accumulation without detriment to growth, and implications for chloroplast TAG accumulation. Algal Res. 2015;12:239–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Nelson BK, Cai X, Nebenführ A. A multicolored set of invivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J. 2007;51:1126–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hu J, Wang D, Li J, Jing G, Ning K, Xu J. Genome-wide identification of transcription factors and transcription-factor binding sites in oleaginous microalgae Nannochloropsis. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5454.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ngan CY, Wong C-H, Choi C, Yoshinaga Y, Louie K, Jia J, et al. Lineage-specific chromatin signatures reveal a regulator of lipid metabolism in microalgae. Nat Plants. 2015;1:15107.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. López García de Lomana A, Schäuble S, Valenzuela J, Imam S, Carter W, Bilgin DD, et al. Transcriptional program for nitrogen starvation-induced lipid accumulation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:1–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Chow C-N, Zheng H-Q, Wu N-Y, Chien C-H, Huang H-D, Lee T-Y, et al. PlantPAN 20: an update of plant promoter analysis navigator for reconstructing transcriptional regulatory networks in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D1154–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Niu YF, Zhang MH, Li DW, Yang WD, Liu JS, Bai WB, et al. Improvement of neutral lipid and polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis by overexpressing a type 2 diacylglycerol acyltransferase in marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Mar Drugs. 2013;11:4558–69.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhou P, Ye L, Xie W, Lv X, Yu H. Highly efficient biosynthesis of astaxanthin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by integration and tuning of algal crtZ and bkt. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:8419–28.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Chen C-X, Sun Z, Cao H-S, Fang F-L, Ouyang L-L, Zhou Z-G. Identification and characterization of three genes encoding acyl-CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) from the microalga Myrmecia incisa Reisigl. Algal Res. 2015;12:280–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Guo X, Fan C, Chen Y, Wang J, Yin W, Wang RRC, et al. Identification and characterization of an efficient acyl-CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) gene from the microalga Chlorella ellipsoidea. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17:48.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Kirchner L, Wirshing A, Kurt L, Reinard T, Glick J, Cram EJ, et al. Identification, characterization, and expression of diacylgylcerol acyltransferase type-1 from Chlorella vulgaris. Algal Res. 2016;13:167–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Goncalves E, Johnson J, Rathinasabapathi B. Conversion of membrane lipid acyl groups to triacylglycerol and formation of lipid bodies upon nitrogen starvation in biofuel green algae Chlorella UTEX29. Planta. 2013;238:895–906.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Abida H, Dolch LJ, Mei C, Villanova V, Conte M, Block MA, et al. Membrane glycerolipid remodeling triggered by nitrogen and phosphorus starvation in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant Physiol. 2015;167:118–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Ohlrogge J, Browse J. Lipid biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1995;7:957–70.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Fan J, Andre C, Xu C. A chloroplast pathway for the de novo biosynthesis of triacylglycerol in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:1985–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Ma X, Liu J, Liu B, Chen T, Yang B, Chen F. Physiological and biochemical changes reveal stress-associated photosynthetic carbon partitioning into triacylglycerol in the oleaginous marine alga Nannochloropsis oculata. Algal Res. 2016;16:28–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Iwai M, Ikeda K, Shimojima M, Ohta H. Enhancement of extraplastidic oil synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using a type-2 diacylglycerol acyltransferase with a phosphorus starvation–inducible promoter. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:808–19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Li D-W, Cen S-Y, Liu Y-H, Balamurugan S, Zheng X-Y, Alimujiang A, et al. A type 2 diacylglycerol acyltransferase accelerates the triacylglycerol biosynthesis in heterokont oleaginous microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica. J Biotechnol. 2016;229:65–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Gargouri M, Park J-J, Holguin FO, Kim M-J, Wang H, Deshpande RR, et al. Identification of regulatory network hubs that control lipid metabolism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Exp Bot. 2015;66:4551–66.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Kang NK, Jeon S, Kwon S, Koh HG, Shin S-E, Lee B, et al. Effects of overexpression of a bHLH transcription factor on biomass and lipid production in Nannochloropsis salina. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Kang NK, Kim EK, Kim YU, Lee B, Jeong W-J, Jeong B-R, et al. Increased lipid production by heterologous expression of AtWRI1 transcription factor in Nannochloropsis salina. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:231.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Kwon S, Kang NK, Koh HG, Shin S-E, Lee B, Jeong B-R, et al. Enhancement of biomass and lipid productivity by overexpression of a bZIP transcription factor in Nannochloropsis salina. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115:331–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang J, Hao Q, Bai L, Xu J, Yin W, Song L, et al. Overexpression of the soybean transcription factor GmDof4 significantly enhances the lipid content of Chlorella ellipsoidea. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:1–16.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Goodson C, Roth R, Wang ZT, Goodenough U. Structural correlates of cytoplasmic and chloroplast lipid body synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and stimulation of lipid body production with acetate boost. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10:1592–606.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Chen W, Yin X, Wang L, Tian J, Yang R, Liu D, et al. Involvement of rose aquaporin RhPIP1;1 in ethylene-regulated petal expansion through interaction with RhPIP2;1. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;83:219–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Waadt R, Schmidt LK, Lohse M, Hashimoto K, Bock R, Kudla J. Multicolor bimolecular fluorescence complementation reveals simultaneous formation of alternative CBL/CIPK complexes in planta. Plant J. 2008;56:505–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Li F, Gao D, Hu H. High-efficiency nuclear transformation of the oleaginous marine Nannochloropsis species using PCR product. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2014;78:812–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Li Y, Horsman M, Wang B, Wu N, Lan C. Effects of nitrogen sources on cell growth and lipid accumulation of green alga Neochloris oleoabundans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;81:629–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement

Biotechnology for Biofuels

ISSN: 1754-6834

Contact us